The length of a string in python is determined with the "len" function. If you don't know this, you don't know python, end of story. If they are looking for a python programmer, you're out.
If you only work with one or two languages, maybe. If you're trying to remember which syntax between Python, Java, PHP, VBScript or Javascript, then Googling is faster than recalling that slow-buried memory.
I don't know where it was (haven't made it in a few years), but there's a really good ciabatta-style bread that I made where you literally dump the ingredients in a bowl, mix them for a bit, let them sit for a while, and then dump it on a pan to bake.
It was good enough for anything you'd use bread for.
Either you have Constitutional rights and won't have to hand over your phone, or you're not under US law at the US border and there's no law to charge you with. There's no legitimate way to charge with a crime at the border like that.
Lots and lots of people have had their library and internet usage used against them in court, and often very successfully.
Which is why Amazon is stepping in... It is an abuse of first amendment rights, success in court or not. And unless someone has deep enough pockets and decent lawyers to defend it all the way to the Supreme Court, our liberties are going to be eroded away even further.
No. The headline on Slashdot is screwing up everyone's comprehension. They're saying that your ability to access information is a first amendment right (free speech delivered to you). The idea that accessing information would automatically implicate you in a related crime is a first amendment violation. Example - I am curious about methamphetamine so I look up the formula for how to make it. Later, I'm a suspect as a producer of methamphetamine. The fact that I looked up information is not proof that I am a criminal.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
If accessing the wrong information at the wrong time makes you culpable for a crime, that violates your first amendment rights. If you check out a book on "how to murder" from the library and suddenly find yourself in a murder trial, that cannot (should not) be used against you.
Free information access and sharing is part of the first amendment. Reading the "wrong" thing at the wrong time because it looks suspicious and having that count against you legally is absolutely a first amendment issue.
If that's true, I think it would be great if they challenged search results being used against you all the way to the supreme court. Though by now, I'd think some precedent must already exist with library book checkout history.
I read all sorts of things that would be "incriminating" by curiosity. I'd hate to read the wrong thing on the wrong day and suddenly be a suspect in a crime.
These are "remains clean-looking after use" and would be covered in oily stuff on the inside. Who knows if recycling centers will even accept it without you finding a way to wash that out.
Except the coating was semi-liquid and becomes part of the product as it is used up. It only works in the bottle because you're not running gallons of product through it. You would have to re-coat the pipes regularly - after cleaning, because you'll probably still be required to wash it off regularly for food safety.
I don't buy ketchup for the bottle. If I did, I would have switched brands by now. I buy it for the formulation and flavor. There is at least one brand that is less sweet and has a better overall flavor profile. Won't name it and go further off topic.
Worse, that's not blue light that's the problem. It's UV. Take a look at a modern freezer aisle someone. Products exposed to constant LED light are sun faded and look decades old.
The Cold War is back. The space program was in large part a showoff of our ability to build rockets and send them to a precise location (a.k.a. ICBMs). It was the same in Russia.
Why didn't that voting machine have ECC memory? Why didn't the software have bounds checking?
Because if one bit-flip changes the totals by more than 1, then the software was designed wrong.
Each vote should be a separate record - the totals should only be a summation. You can keep a running tally separately as a backup record, but that should not be your only count. If one bit flips, one vote changes - not one bit on the total.
Slashdot Mirror
The length of a string in python is determined with the "len" function. If you don't know this, you don't know python, end of story. If they are looking for a python programmer, you're out.
If you only work with one or two languages, maybe. If you're trying to remember which syntax between Python, Java, PHP, VBScript or Javascript, then Googling is faster than recalling that slow-buried memory.
DFW is in Texas.
Peeling potatoes? It's better and more nutritious with the skin on. Cleaning dishes? Dishwasher. So that leaves just a few pots and pans at most.
What it really takes is planning - if you don't have the food at home at the right time, that's where it becomes a real time sink.
I don't know where it was (haven't made it in a few years), but there's a really good ciabatta-style bread that I made where you literally dump the ingredients in a bowl, mix them for a bit, let them sit for a while, and then dump it on a pan to bake.
It was good enough for anything you'd use bread for.
If you are not under the Bill of Rights, you are not under US law. There is no grounds for suspending them on US soil.
Either you have Constitutional rights and won't have to hand over your phone, or you're not under US law at the US border and there's no law to charge you with. There's no legitimate way to charge with a crime at the border like that.
I thought US law was suspended at the border. Otherwise the protections of the Constitution would apply.
The iphone is 4 taps to get to the wipe screen if use TouchID to unlock, which is probably comparable effort to a duress wipe pin.
Effort isn't the issue here - apparent compliance to instructions while being watched is.
Byuu should have been smarter
The recipient had very little control in that matter.
Lots and lots of people have had their library and internet usage used against them in court, and often very successfully.
Which is why Amazon is stepping in... It is an abuse of first amendment rights, success in court or not. And unless someone has deep enough pockets and decent lawyers to defend it all the way to the Supreme Court, our liberties are going to be eroded away even further.
No. The headline on Slashdot is screwing up everyone's comprehension. They're saying that your ability to access information is a first amendment right (free speech delivered to you). The idea that accessing information would automatically implicate you in a related crime is a first amendment violation. Example - I am curious about methamphetamine so I look up the formula for how to make it. Later, I'm a suspect as a producer of methamphetamine. The fact that I looked up information is not proof that I am a criminal.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
If accessing the wrong information at the wrong time makes you culpable for a crime, that violates your first amendment rights. If you check out a book on "how to murder" from the library and suddenly find yourself in a murder trial, that cannot (should not) be used against you.
novel First Amendment argument
Same as Google Search history
Library checkouts
Free information access and sharing is part of the first amendment. Reading the "wrong" thing at the wrong time because it looks suspicious and having that count against you legally is absolutely a first amendment issue.
If that's true, I think it would be great if they challenged search results being used against you all the way to the supreme court. Though by now, I'd think some precedent must already exist with library book checkout history.
I read all sorts of things that would be "incriminating" by curiosity. I'd hate to read the wrong thing on the wrong day and suddenly be a suspect in a crime.
These are "remains clean-looking after use" and would be covered in oily stuff on the inside. Who knows if recycling centers will even accept it without you finding a way to wash that out.
Except the coating was semi-liquid and becomes part of the product as it is used up. It only works in the bottle because you're not running gallons of product through it. You would have to re-coat the pipes regularly - after cleaning, because you'll probably still be required to wash it off regularly for food safety.
I don't buy ketchup for the bottle. If I did, I would have switched brands by now. I buy it for the formulation and flavor. There is at least one brand that is less sweet and has a better overall flavor profile. Won't name it and go further off topic.
sickle cell anemia
Also from Africa - protects against malaria
Set color to sRGB color mode. It may look too red at first, but your eyes will adjust and it will be much less harsh.
Worse, that's not blue light that's the problem. It's UV. Take a look at a modern freezer aisle someone. Products exposed to constant LED light are sun faded and look decades old.
I actually bought a red LED flashlight for nighttime reading and retrofitted a red theater gel into another book light.
I don't know why reading helps me sleep. I just need to find a way to put a red gel on my Kindle Paperwhite without affecting the touch.
Ditto. It's a huge waste of money for the advertiser. And when it comes to a router, if you buy one 3 years later it's going to be a different model.
The Cold War is back. The space program was in large part a showoff of our ability to build rockets and send them to a precise location (a.k.a. ICBMs). It was the same in Russia.
Why didn't that voting machine have ECC memory? Why didn't the software have bounds checking?
Because if one bit-flip changes the totals by more than 1, then the software was designed wrong.
Each vote should be a separate record - the totals should only be a summation. You can keep a running tally separately as a backup record, but that should not be your only count. If one bit flips, one vote changes - not one bit on the total.
You can RAID memory? ..... checksum, detect and repair single-bit errors in blocks of bytes
ECC Memory?