And how many parents sign or click agree to an agreement before entering a high school stadium. The most they could do is construe violating those policies as being trespassing and kick them out. They would still retain rights to the photos they took.
While all that's true, he didn't have a release from the athletes to post their likeness online. That's usually part of the standard parent signature form in athletics (I assume - I'm no athlete) but that would only affect photos taken under authority of the school. So the school has no standing, but the students and their parents might.
Yes. This would be the simplest option. Unless the problem is that the loading software will only do one at a time and this is to make the very slow updates happen in parallel (30 minutes vs. up to 8 hours).
Not entirely. There are some genetic metabolic disorders for which antibodies resulting from vaccines potentially present a serious risk. Not just ASD, but a few other risks. Can't find the journal articles at the moment, but they are out there.
Agreed. My wife may have an MTHFR mutation, which would give any potential future children serious risks to vaccination. Not having enough medical exceptions is what scares me about laws like this. We would have to rely on herd immunity, which of course this law would help with if it weren't for the fact that it would mandate vaccines to people who may be at risk from them.
I'll second everything but step 3. I would get some standard libraries set up to extract the plain text from each format and make that searchable. Probably much simpler.
Their stupid rewards program is tied to a gift card. And ONLY works on purchases paid via that gift card (which can be auto-reloaded and have balance transfers to it from gift cards you receive as gifts). The answer for most people is not to use their rewards program at all.
Using your "human" analogy, human colonies survive for thousands of years. Damascus, Syria is over 6,000 years old. If human colonies started dying out, you'd notice.
I could be wrong (can't make much sense of it either), but it may scale up exponentially rather than linearly as opposed to traditional circuits. I don't really see any proof that this is true, other than they highlighted how this would somehow be an improvement.
The only thing I can gather from the article is that this enables a massively parallel comparator. And then somehow that translates to someday faster pattern recognition for speech / image. Very scarce on details.
Unlimited storage, 25 MB of photo and video attachments, advanced spam filters, virus protection
I have no idea if that means 25MB per email or total for your mailbox. I'd hope it was the former. They support POP3 or IMAP.
Their current webmail client seems to be somewhat OK (if not cloned outright from Google and then had banner ads slapped in) - screenshot is over 2 years old: http://venturebeat.com/2012/07...
I don't think it means they're leading edge in any way, but they're not lagging behind nearly as much as I thought they were.
Most don't need to get rich to be happy. For some, struggling with low income doing what they love is better than holding a regular job.
But really, it's like starting any small business. A large number of them fail. And you have to be entering a market that has room for you. It's about making a living and not getting rich or famous.
One example was when RR - the cable modem business - temporarily risked losing the "right" to use the cartoon character's likeness because the other part of TW that controls cartoons (Warner Bros? Don't remember) didn't like that we were doing things like using "Beep! Beep!" in our ads... the official, trademarked term is "Meep! Beep!"
A little crazy, considering Beep Beep is literally a title of one of the cartoons.
But as far as I can tell, they don't have anything registered as a trademark. While the sound is closer to "Meep Meep" I've only ever seen it written as "Beep Beep" even in the cartoons themselves.
Oops...yeah...I have no idea why I lumped AT&T in there. If you're already a FiOS customer you get to keep your FiOS. They aren't running any new fiber (since 2010!!). It's done.
AT&T is really just the T-1000 of the telecom industry (wish I could link to Stephen Colbert's 2007 video but here is the general idea - http://consumerist.com/2011/03...)
You have to ask yourself how I got the facts that wrong and still got modded so high.
Except if you had enough rights to install Chrome Frame, you could just use Chrome as your main browser and use the IE Tab extension in Chrome for those few pages that need IE.
Who said anything about being a millionaire? I'm talking about the artists who are making $1/song and are happy with only selling 10's of thousands per year. These are the ones who don't just play music, they write it. They create art and culture.
Pop music where the artist gets 5 cents per download are the ones who become millionaires. And they don't deserve it any more than the label that puts the crap out. I never even tried to equate them.
It's server-side code anyway. The client side should only ever be receiving HTML/Javascript. And if your HTML/Javascript is so bad that it only worked in one browser (worst of all IE-only), there's no hope for you.
Slashdot Mirror
If he's using photos of individually identified people and posting them commercially he does. The only exception to that is for news media.
http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guid...
And how many parents sign or click agree to an agreement before entering a high school stadium. The most they could do is construe violating those policies as being trespassing and kick them out. They would still retain rights to the photos they took.
While all that's true, he didn't have a release from the athletes to post their likeness online. That's usually part of the standard parent signature form in athletics (I assume - I'm no athlete) but that would only affect photos taken under authority of the school. So the school has no standing, but the students and their parents might.
Yes. This would be the simplest option. Unless the problem is that the loading software will only do one at a time and this is to make the very slow updates happen in parallel (30 minutes vs. up to 8 hours).
Not entirely. There are some genetic metabolic disorders for which antibodies resulting from vaccines potentially present a serious risk. Not just ASD, but a few other risks. Can't find the journal articles at the moment, but they are out there.
Agreed. My wife may have an MTHFR mutation, which would give any potential future children serious risks to vaccination. Not having enough medical exceptions is what scares me about laws like this. We would have to rely on herd immunity, which of course this law would help with if it weren't for the fact that it would mandate vaccines to people who may be at risk from them.
Because it's most likely overkill if all you want is indexing.
Zardoz, The Room, Birdemic...
I'll second everything but step 3. I would get some standard libraries set up to extract the plain text from each format and make that searchable. Probably much simpler.
Their stupid rewards program is tied to a gift card. And ONLY works on purchases paid via that gift card (which can be auto-reloaded and have balance transfers to it from gift cards you receive as gifts). The answer for most people is not to use their rewards program at all.
colony != individual. If you're having trouble with the word colony, replace it with the word "city" in your mind.
Well said.
Using your "human" analogy, human colonies survive for thousands of years. Damascus, Syria is over 6,000 years old. If human colonies started dying out, you'd notice.
eleventy billion? Wouldn't that be 110 billion? I guess someone's making up for the bees' absence.
I could be wrong (can't make much sense of it either), but it may scale up exponentially rather than linearly as opposed to traditional circuits. I don't really see any proof that this is true, other than they highlighted how this would somehow be an improvement.
The only thing I can gather from the article is that this enables a massively parallel comparator. And then somehow that translates to someday faster pattern recognition for speech / image. Very scarce on details.
Early adopters or Eternal September?
From their marketing:
Unlimited storage, 25 MB of photo and video attachments, advanced spam filters, virus protection
I have no idea if that means 25MB per email or total for your mailbox. I'd hope it was the former. They support POP3 or IMAP.
Their current webmail client seems to be somewhat OK (if not cloned outright from Google and then had banner ads slapped in) - screenshot is over 2 years old:
http://venturebeat.com/2012/07...
I don't think it means they're leading edge in any way, but they're not lagging behind nearly as much as I thought they were.
Most don't need to get rich to be happy. For some, struggling with low income doing what they love is better than holding a regular job.
But really, it's like starting any small business. A large number of them fail. And you have to be entering a market that has room for you. It's about making a living and not getting rich or famous.
Going back to the parent post, it's still a bad plan. That just means it wasn't your bad plan.
One example was when RR - the cable modem business - temporarily risked losing the "right" to use the cartoon character's likeness because the other part of TW that controls cartoons (Warner Bros? Don't remember) didn't like that we were doing things like using "Beep! Beep!" in our ads ... the official, trademarked term is "Meep! Beep!"
A little crazy, considering Beep Beep is literally a title of one of the cartoons.
But as far as I can tell, they don't have anything registered as a trademark. While the sound is closer to "Meep Meep" I've only ever seen it written as "Beep Beep" even in the cartoons themselves.
Oops...yeah...I have no idea why I lumped AT&T in there. If you're already a FiOS customer you get to keep your FiOS. They aren't running any new fiber (since 2010!!). It's done.
AT&T is really just the T-1000 of the telecom industry (wish I could link to Stephen Colbert's 2007 video but here is the general idea - http://consumerist.com/2011/03...)
You have to ask yourself how I got the facts that wrong and still got modded so high.
Except if you had enough rights to install Chrome Frame, you could just use Chrome as your main browser and use the IE Tab extension in Chrome for those few pages that need IE.
Who said anything about being a millionaire? I'm talking about the artists who are making $1/song and are happy with only selling 10's of thousands per year. These are the ones who don't just play music, they write it. They create art and culture.
Pop music where the artist gets 5 cents per download are the ones who become millionaires. And they don't deserve it any more than the label that puts the crap out. I never even tried to equate them.
It's server-side code anyway. The client side should only ever be receiving HTML/Javascript. And if your HTML/Javascript is so bad that it only worked in one browser (worst of all IE-only), there's no hope for you.