Plugging it in with a thousands of feet long cord, which has to be handled as well. It's about being cordless as much as anything else driving the efficiency.
And yet if you're using junk like that you could get a dozen or more VMs per physical machine with something a little more powerful. Huge waste of money even if they weren't $1K each.
You can go ahead and not define it as fraud until it is exchanged for goods or services. But it won't make a practical difference.
But no, you don't blame the victims of fraud. It might or might not be poor design, but as you build a better system someone will always build a better hacker.
Our family line has a ringer, but that's after an IVR that asks you to press a key for who you want to talk to. It just so happens to block ALL robodialers from ringing our phone in effect. Like I said. It depends what you put on the receiving end.
Try using Wi-Fi in a Manhattan high-rise, where there are probably 100 SSIDs in range of any given apartment
Try 5GHz - the shorter range means you might need a few devices for even a modest apartment but it naturally limits interference. 802.11ad is even more limited (as in not available yet), which is a good thing for dense environments. Most smart speakers also offer Bluetooth, which is designed around short range and low bandwidth.
And literally none of that is impossible to do with an 1/8" headphone jack.
For Apple, this was more about making the devices thinner for yet another generation instead of using the empty space for more battery. In both cases, those issues are easily overcome with an adapter.
They were the first to remove the floppy drive - and certainly weren't the last. Everyone else has followed. This is nothing new for Apple. They don't follow trends, they set them - even if they turn out dumb.
Maintaining the status quo for decades gets you IBM. To stay alive you have to shake things up and at least try to innovate. Even if it means favoring wireless communication over wired before the world catches up. I no longer use my phone as a music device (except in the car via USB-C), and my phone is not an iPhone. It has no headphone jack either. At home, I cast to speakers. With Chromecast Audio, at least, I don't think there is any transcoding before transmitting. And in the end, a mobile device doesn't have much room for a decent DAC, so better to let the big device with the speakers do the job.
They hide search for a reason. They only provide value when you're not searching for popular shows and movies and seeing that none of them are there. It's a bad excuse, because I know what's there and I just want to go find it quickly. They also make that list that you hand-curated hard to find, because they don't want you to see how often their licensing changes.
So you want a single core computer? It has nothing to do with hyperthreading (which itself is related to SMT). Speculative execution is only one of the optimizations involved, and the one that has all the security issues.
Put down that iPhone and get an Android with a swipe keyboard.
I'm in the same boat, but multiple people in the house. Still only need one stream right now. On the one hand, it's an extra they can throw in for basically free (but so is UHD), but on the other hand multiple screen subscriptions are often shared across multiple households.
Yeah, "they" did that. As if content producers wouldn't have drastically raised licensing fees under any other circumstance once they realized the real value. I'd rather Netflix keep their rates less than $100/mo. because that's why I dropped cable.
Slashdot Mirror
I know that I could take it seriously without Firefox.
Sure, better stick with those secure amd64 computers with speculative execution.
Pods are efficient because it can get rid of manual transfers. They can go the whole way to whatever destination.
Plugging it in with a thousands of feet long cord, which has to be handled as well. It's about being cordless as much as anything else driving the efficiency.
Spoofed through software is more likely. Something the Android SDK helps you do, in fact.
And yet if you're using junk like that you could get a dozen or more VMs per physical machine with something a little more powerful. Huge waste of money even if they weren't $1K each.
And this has to be amateur level. Why 45 laptops instead of hundreds of VMs on a decent workstation/server hardware?
You can go ahead and not define it as fraud until it is exchanged for goods or services. But it won't make a practical difference.
But no, you don't blame the victims of fraud. It might or might not be poor design, but as you build a better system someone will always build a better hacker.
Retreating? This was a happy accident. Was not the reason for the IVR.
Our family line has a ringer, but that's after an IVR that asks you to press a key for who you want to talk to. It just so happens to block ALL robodialers from ringing our phone in effect. Like I said. It depends what you put on the receiving end.
It's your choice what you put on the receiving end. Don't use something with a ringer if you don't want that or it gives you PTSD.
Try using Wi-Fi in a Manhattan high-rise, where there are probably 100 SSIDs in range of any given apartment
Try 5GHz - the shorter range means you might need a few devices for even a modest apartment but it naturally limits interference. 802.11ad is even more limited (as in not available yet), which is a good thing for dense environments. Most smart speakers also offer Bluetooth, which is designed around short range and low bandwidth.
And literally none of that is impossible to do with an 1/8" headphone jack.
For Apple, this was more about making the devices thinner for yet another generation instead of using the empty space for more battery. In both cases, those issues are easily overcome with an adapter.
Removing ports that people still use today,
They were the first to remove the floppy drive - and certainly weren't the last. Everyone else has followed. This is nothing new for Apple. They don't follow trends, they set them - even if they turn out dumb.
Maintaining the status quo for decades gets you IBM. To stay alive you have to shake things up and at least try to innovate. Even if it means favoring wireless communication over wired before the world catches up. I no longer use my phone as a music device (except in the car via USB-C), and my phone is not an iPhone. It has no headphone jack either. At home, I cast to speakers. With Chromecast Audio, at least, I don't think there is any transcoding before transmitting. And in the end, a mobile device doesn't have much room for a decent DAC, so better to let the big device with the speakers do the job.
I've had a narrow naropharyngeal cavity my whole life. Great for holding your breath underwater, but terrible for breathing while laying down.
They hide search for a reason. They only provide value when you're not searching for popular shows and movies and seeing that none of them are there. It's a bad excuse, because I know what's there and I just want to go find it quickly. They also make that list that you hand-curated hard to find, because they don't want you to see how often their licensing changes.
SMP should be perma-off I'd say
So you want a single core computer? It has nothing to do with hyperthreading (which itself is related to SMT). Speculative execution is only one of the optimizations involved, and the one that has all the security issues.
Citizen Kane is much older and not nearly as boring. This is specifically a problem with Late 60s / early 70s movies, especially sci-fi.
Because it's exploring the impacts of emerging technology on the world?
Nice comment, wrong article
Put down that iPhone and get an Android with a swipe keyboard.
I'm in the same boat, but multiple people in the house. Still only need one stream right now. On the one hand, it's an extra they can throw in for basically free (but so is UHD), but on the other hand multiple screen subscriptions are often shared across multiple households.
Yeah, "they" did that. As if content producers wouldn't have drastically raised licensing fees under any other circumstance once they realized the real value. I'd rather Netflix keep their rates less than $100/mo. because that's why I dropped cable.
ONLY when traffic is at a dead stop. Otherwise, it's just as illegal in CA. And incredibly dangerous.
Not a great attitude toward e-waste. Even if you're not the one repurposing it.
The latest update on the article points here:
https://unix.stackexchange.com...
Linux is simply blocked from even seeing the SSD hardware by the T2 chip.
Is 2031 not going to happen? Do you know something we don't?