You seem to know a lot about the wording of this rule. Did you find a source for the full text? Until then, I remain very skeptical - as my interpretation lines up with the current administrations goals very well.
The refurbisher licenses are for former enterprise licensed PCs, upgrading from Vista, and for replaced motherboards. First sale doctrine still applies to the OEM license otherwise (legally speaking).
They sell licenses at that rate to businesses in their refurbisher program (or maybe closer to $30). I don't know whether that includes the physical disk or not, but they would be eligible to download for their own use. Just not profit from a disc replication service.
Anonymize the data. That's what everyone else does.
That's specifically what this rule is proposed to prevent. That constitutes the confidential data that is not being disclosed, and thereby the entire research is excluded from EPA consideration. And due to HIPAA and the unlikelihood that patients will all sign a release for their medical information, that's exactly what would happen.
But requiring all the science data to be available is a GOOD thing.
Unless the science data can't be made available, thereby invalidating all research that involves medical side effects. This is just a way to prevent science from being used because it proves too much.
Yeah, let's get a test environment set up, stat. And by environment, I guess I mean a duplicate Earth? That doesn't sound all that practical, you know.
Adaptive sync for consoles is a sign that the console is dead. If the console can't keep up with 60Hz and you need to resort to adaptive refresh rates to avoid tearing, then the console or games were done wrong. If you want to support higher refresh rates, fine. Just tune the game to work with the one and only variation of hardware you have.
Who gives a shit? We can dig. Is the concept of stratum new territory for this guy?
That's the first clue to know where to dig. It's how most things are discovered. Just digging random holes on a planet with a surface area of near 200 million square miles is generally not very productive.
Yeah - my point was you were probably shipped what was essentially leftover junk bought at fire sale prices. The special purpose didn't justify the hardware's existence and nobody bought it for its intended purpose.
this particular monitor wasn't optimised for that... I tried playing DVDs on them, and it was still garbage
That's because it would require noon standard software. If the screens were designed for that purpose, they would still only work for that purpose as a link in a longer chain.
this drug does in fact cost $100,000 per year for treatment then demanding the company sell it for $50,000 just means the government demanded the company into bankruptcy
If the cost of the drug is more down to recovering R&D costs, then it's better to sell it at any price than not at all.
It's not the only reason. If they use different ratios of delivery/carrier materials, it does need to be proven that they don't interfere with dosing and absorption. And if the patent only covers the active ingredient, can the composition of the tablet itself be kept as a trade secret or is it published with some sort of FDA document? Honest question, I don't know the answer to that.
You're not kidding. I planned out a new PC build yesterday (Thursday) and ordered all the parts. It wasn't until today that I realized that my "order confirmation" email from Micro Center was a pre-order. And that explained why I couldn't find any benchmark results.
If Google thought that XMPP was good enough, they would have used it. It was the basis for Google Talk and based their protocol for Google Wave on it. Phones don't have always-on connections despite our best wishes, so they would need something a little bit different.
Two, at making sure that their product naming is as confusing as possible.
I still give Microsoft credit for winning at that. When they first released "Pixelsense" they called it the Microsoft Surface. And then a few years later rebranded only four months before reusing the name for their laptops.
Slashdot Mirror
Security updates are small deltas. Feature updates are gigabytes of barely changed / recompiled files.
Unless it involves just a pure white screen where you have to have previously memorized an invisible design layout
You don't want to get sued by Snapchat, do you?
And you can engage neither of these if you're not in the room.
You seem to know a lot about the wording of this rule. Did you find a source for the full text? Until then, I remain very skeptical - as my interpretation lines up with the current administrations goals very well.
Burnt DVDs or original pressed DVDs makes no difference, both are distributing a copyrighted work.
One of those is protected by the first sale doctrine in the US and can always be resold.
The refurbisher licenses are for former enterprise licensed PCs, upgrading from Vista, and for replaced motherboards. First sale doctrine still applies to the OEM license otherwise (legally speaking).
They sell licenses at that rate to businesses in their refurbisher program (or maybe closer to $30). I don't know whether that includes the physical disk or not, but they would be eligible to download for their own use. Just not profit from a disc replication service.
The answer is copyright. And he didn't have the right to copy and distribute. Technically not even for free.
Anonymize the data. That's what everyone else does.
That's specifically what this rule is proposed to prevent. That constitutes the confidential data that is not being disclosed, and thereby the entire research is excluded from EPA consideration. And due to HIPAA and the unlikelihood that patients will all sign a release for their medical information, that's exactly what would happen.
But requiring all the science data to be available is a GOOD thing.
Unless the science data can't be made available, thereby invalidating all research that involves medical side effects. This is just a way to prevent science from being used because it proves too much.
Yeah, let's get a test environment set up, stat. And by environment, I guess I mean a duplicate Earth? That doesn't sound all that practical, you know.
But what sort of research would be private and have an impact ?
Cancer clusters vs. HIPAA.
Adaptive sync for consoles is a sign that the console is dead. If the console can't keep up with 60Hz and you need to resort to adaptive refresh rates to avoid tearing, then the console or games were done wrong. If you want to support higher refresh rates, fine. Just tune the game to work with the one and only variation of hardware you have.
ancient surface
Who gives a shit? We can dig. Is the concept of stratum new territory for this guy?
That's the first clue to know where to dig. It's how most things are discovered. Just digging random holes on a planet with a surface area of near 200 million square miles is generally not very productive.
If they were like Microsoft, they'd suddenly jump to Chrome version 100
I thought it was Mozilla who suddenly started accelerating their version numbers.
Yeah - my point was you were probably shipped what was essentially leftover junk bought at fire sale prices. The special purpose didn't justify the hardware's existence and nobody bought it for its intended purpose.
this particular monitor wasn't optimised for that ... I tried playing DVDs on them, and it was still garbage
That's because it would require noon standard software. If the screens were designed for that purpose, they would still only work for that purpose as a link in a longer chain.
this drug does in fact cost $100,000 per year for treatment then demanding the company sell it for $50,000 just means the government demanded the company into bankruptcy
If the cost of the drug is more down to recovering R&D costs, then it's better to sell it at any price than not at all.
Each pharmacy would probably have to go through FDA trials and approvals for their method in doing that.
It's not the only reason. If they use different ratios of delivery/carrier materials, it does need to be proven that they don't interfere with dosing and absorption. And if the patent only covers the active ingredient, can the composition of the tablet itself be kept as a trade secret or is it published with some sort of FDA document? Honest question, I don't know the answer to that.
But it was set up wrong, so it made noise. So it's also an alarm by your definition.
AMD's timing couldn't be more perfect.
You're not kidding. I planned out a new PC build yesterday (Thursday) and ordered all the parts. It wasn't until today that I realized that my "order confirmation" email from Micro Center was a pre-order. And that explained why I couldn't find any benchmark results.
If Google thought that XMPP was good enough, they would have used it. It was the basis for Google Talk and based their protocol for Google Wave on it. Phones don't have always-on connections despite our best wishes, so they would need something a little bit different.
Two, at making sure that their product naming is as confusing as possible.
I still give Microsoft credit for winning at that. When they first released "Pixelsense" they called it the Microsoft Surface. And then a few years later rebranded only four months before reusing the name for their laptops.
It wasn't designed as a test of UBI. At all. It just happens to test a few of its tenets.