Yea they are claiming everyone was misinformed but when public wasn't informed properly on a bill and it was passed it end up being abused. Its something that might be applied to the DMCA, yea its a bill to allow rights holder to get their works removed from like Youtube etc. But allowed for almost 0 punishment when a company claims rights to something they don't own (ex, Twit.tv's show called TNT they had a clip of a Megaupload video, they are a new show which they fall under fail-use UMG had video pulled with a bogus copyright claim when they had no right to do it.) What bill is said to be meant for vs what bill is worded and CAN be used for are usually not told to the public cept when a lawyer from say EFF read it and say what it can be used for.
The bulldozer and i7-2600k were about same performance wise but that is 8 core cpu vs 4 cores + HT. Powerusage of both machines at wall was like 250watts under load. When you overclocked both the bulldozer to 4.8ghz and i7 to 5ghz, i7 used 80 more watts, the bulldozer doubled its draw to over 500 watts, i think it was 550 watts.
If i get this right that "coalition" wanted companies like rogers and bell to pay twice for movies and television show's that they already pay $$$ to the tv company they pay money to to show that channel?
They want MP3 to have a double standard, they are treated as material for 1 law but not when it comes to another law. Hate to say that is pretty dumb way to try to get things. But it figures only music industry and movie industries could come up with such a moron argument. I am glad judge didn't side with such non-sense, if its material under 1 law then its material on all law's.
um, if it has a physical key, like a safe key you have to provide it, the 5th only protects you from doing testimony against yourself in court. Now passkey for a PGP file would be testimony.
well to decrypted the drive means you have to provide testimony of the PASSWORD to decrypt the drive, which then you are providing testimony against yourself.
But really best way would be have say a dedicated server is another country that holds the encrypted data, even give a friend that lives in another country axx to use it. Then you can claims the data in question is not your and you don't know the password.
it may work in a race car but in normal every day cars it don't, example i will use "2011 Chevrolet Silverado C15 2WD 5.3 L, 8 cyl, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline or E85" it gets rated 21 MPG with gas, put e85 in it it only gets 16 MPG. that is 25% drop in mileage. Now look at how much E85 costs compared gas, on avg e85 is only 10% cheaper, some cases its up to 20%. so in end you are spending more to run E85. That is problem.
They can only be enforced in country they are passed in and internet in itself is its own country with no laws what so ever cause not 1 countries laws can apply to it.
"Works with any U.S. cable provider InfiniTV 4 PCIe connects to any U.S. cable system to receive all SD and HD digital cable channels without needing a separate set-top box." --- right off their website
They even used the DMCA removal tool on a streaming news program that uploads their videos to youtube when they had a clip of the video on their show and talked and Criticized it. Show in question is called TNT (Tech News Today). Its a week day program on Twit.tv. UMG claimed copyright in that video even though they used the clip under the fair use provision to discuss the story and comment. Clear violation of of the Fair Use Act that reads "Section (V) is similar to a broader version of the third prong of fair use and allows circumvention that enables access to public interest works for the purposes of "criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, or research." Since they are a News program.
When will these copyright groups learn that DNS Poisoning as this pretty much is don't stop anything. They may claim it will stop most people, But are most people really that dumb to not know how to use google or bing to search out easy way around the blocks.
Slashdot Mirror
here is a quote for RIAA/MPAA, "Roman Nagel: You're analog players in a digital world." - From movie Ocean's Thirteen
Yea they are claiming everyone was misinformed but when public wasn't informed properly on a bill and it was passed it end up being abused. Its something that might be applied to the DMCA, yea its a bill to allow rights holder to get their works removed from like Youtube etc. But allowed for almost 0 punishment when a company claims rights to something they don't own (ex, Twit.tv's show called TNT they had a clip of a Megaupload video, they are a new show which they fall under fail-use UMG had video pulled with a bogus copyright claim when they had no right to do it.) What bill is said to be meant for vs what bill is worded and CAN be used for are usually not told to the public cept when a lawyer from say EFF read it and say what it can be used for.
The bulldozer and i7-2600k were about same performance wise but that is 8 core cpu vs 4 cores + HT. Powerusage of both machines at wall was like 250watts under load. When you overclocked both the bulldozer to 4.8ghz and i7 to 5ghz, i7 used 80 more watts, the bulldozer doubled its draw to over 500 watts, i think it was 550 watts.
Less it can provide competition for Intel's cpu's at same price level and not use a ton more power like they have can't say its any point to care.
unfortunately its wrong cable that was snapped according to the map. http://www.cablemap.info/
They never have and never will care about the Consumer til the day they are looking at bankruptcy.
If i get this right that "coalition" wanted companies like rogers and bell to pay twice for movies and television show's that they already pay $$$ to the tv company they pay money to to show that channel?
They want MP3 to have a double standard, they are treated as material for 1 law but not when it comes to another law. Hate to say that is pretty dumb way to try to get things. But it figures only music industry and movie industries could come up with such a moron argument. I am glad judge didn't side with such non-sense, if its material under 1 law then its material on all law's.
um, if it has a physical key, like a safe key you have to provide it, the 5th only protects you from doing testimony against yourself in court. Now passkey for a PGP file would be testimony.
well to decrypted the drive means you have to provide testimony of the PASSWORD to decrypt the drive, which then you are providing testimony against yourself.
But really best way would be have say a dedicated server is another country that holds the encrypted data, even give a friend that lives in another country axx to use it. Then you can claims the data in question is not your and you don't know the password.
Depends on what is stored on that drive i would say No, and take the contempt of court charges.
it may work in a race car but in normal every day cars it don't, example i will use "2011 Chevrolet Silverado C15 2WD 5.3 L, 8 cyl, Automatic 6-spd, Regular Gasoline or E85" it gets rated 21 MPG with gas, put e85 in it it only gets 16 MPG. that is 25% drop in mileage. Now look at how much E85 costs compared gas, on avg e85 is only 10% cheaper, some cases its up to 20%. so in end you are spending more to run E85. That is problem.
i just hope its not no console to pc port crap like most games have been, usually graphics get crapped on when they do that.
They can only be enforced in country they are passed in and internet in itself is its own country with no laws what so ever cause not 1 countries laws can apply to it.
the AMD that was Overclocked to 8ghz only had 1 of its cores enabled
"Works with any U.S. cable provider InfiniTV 4 PCIe connects to any U.S. cable system to receive all SD and HD digital cable channels without needing a separate set-top box." --- right off their website
No it should work with any cable tv provider, TWC, charter etc, you just gotta purchase a cable card from them.
you mean something like http://cetoncorp.com/products/infinitv-4-pcie/ ? record up to 4 HD channels at once if you have a cable card from your cable tv provider
So apple has a patent for just entering personal data in a mobile device? WTF is next they are ruled to own the patent on the idea of a smart phone?
They even used the DMCA removal tool on a streaming news program that uploads their videos to youtube when they had a clip of the video on their show and talked and Criticized it. Show in question is called TNT (Tech News Today). Its a week day program on Twit.tv. UMG claimed copyright in that video even though they used the clip under the fair use provision to discuss the story and comment. Clear violation of of the Fair Use Act that reads "Section (V) is similar to a broader version of the third prong of fair use and allows circumvention that enables access to public interest works for the purposes of "criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, or research." Since they are a News program.
When will these copyright groups learn that DNS Poisoning as this pretty much is don't stop anything. They may claim it will stop most people, But are most people really that dumb to not know how to use google or bing to search out easy way around the blocks.
When has it been limited to 5, for last year or 2 its told me i only have a limit to use 2 on free account?
After Job's died I said Apple is gonna start to slip cause without job's apple wouldn't be here and without him its only a matter of time.
Wow that is pretty sad for a major company to treat its customers like that by giving them a number and treating based on how high it is.