Try again, every argument you have is ludicrous, why don't you step up and explain what your policies are exactly? Bring manufacturing back to the US because it's doing so well on the environment? Immediate rise in CO2 production because it is not adequately regulated in America either. Do nothing until we have heard the opinion of every last naysayer? Good luck with that. As for your "reduce environmental regulations to save the environment" argument, that takes the biscuit as the stupidest thing I have heard this year. Congratulations.
FALSE FALSE FALSE! All that needs done is adjusting import taxes to reflect the true cost, your house of strawmen must be very flammable, fortunatley it takes less than a wolf to blow it down.
Ah that explains why so many videos on youtube have such great audio, because it's all so easily quantifiable and the need to listen is totally removed.
You don't need to have someone onboard for a plan that makes sense, ever heard of leading by example? China are going to be selling the backwater US green tech at this rate because partisans you are supporting with your "do nothing listen to every halfwitted opinion" tactic refuse to believe in the need for change. I'm not focusing on politics, just the science, which says pretty much irrefutably "burning fossil fuels is a problem and we're going to run out anyway, so lets change asap".
Did you just get modded insightful for basically saying "some people have different opinions so let's sit down and listen to them all"? Do you think that would have worked with the moon landings? You could have sat all day listening to people discussing how terrified they were of setting the cheese on fire or you could launch a fucking rocket and go there because that's what the scientists say is right. Which technique will prove more successful?
The tax burden now is as high as the economy will sustain (a bit higher actually, as we see businesses flee the US, and the only real growth is from inflation.)
https://ibeconomics.wordpress.com/2011/04/ Other sources seem to indicate it as it historic lows, so maybe you're completely wrong. The only reason you see manufacturing leaving is because other countries have a slightly more lax attitude to slave labour. If it makes you feel better maybe you should campaign for that, at least you'd be being honest.
How about instead of worrying about making weapons safe when it turns out you've armed the wrong guys (yet again) you instead consider not arming them in the first place? Revolutionary, I know.
Exactly, the problem is that America is once again taking the NRA option let's "arm the good guys"! How about you stop throwing fuel on the fire in the middle east rather than trying to throw it on the right bit.
Leased medallions are a tax, bought ones are an investment, I'd have thought a free marketeer like yourself would prefer the latter. As I said earlier, imagine it more like owning a shop on a busy street.
Slashdot Mirror
Try again, every argument you have is ludicrous, why don't you step up and explain what your policies are exactly? Bring manufacturing back to the US because it's doing so well on the environment? Immediate rise in CO2 production because it is not adequately regulated in America either. Do nothing until we have heard the opinion of every last naysayer? Good luck with that. As for your "reduce environmental regulations to save the environment" argument, that takes the biscuit as the stupidest thing I have heard this year. Congratulations.
FALSE FALSE FALSE! All that needs done is adjusting import taxes to reflect the true cost, your house of strawmen must be very flammable, fortunatley it takes less than a wolf to blow it down.
Ah that explains why so many videos on youtube have such great audio, because it's all so easily quantifiable and the need to listen is totally removed.
Have you met many teenage boys?
I expect in accordance with scientific practice it means compared to an untreated control group.
A retro virus? Like spanish flu? Or a retrovirus?
The word your vocabulary seems to be missing is troll, the advice: "Do not feed...".
You don't need to have someone onboard for a plan that makes sense, ever heard of leading by example? China are going to be selling the backwater US green tech at this rate because partisans you are supporting with your "do nothing listen to every halfwitted opinion" tactic refuse to believe in the need for change. I'm not focusing on politics, just the science, which says pretty much irrefutably "burning fossil fuels is a problem and we're going to run out anyway, so lets change asap".
Americans, however, can't stop talking about awesomely efficient their government is...
Did you just get modded insightful for basically saying "some people have different opinions so let's sit down and listen to them all"? Do you think that would have worked with the moon landings? You could have sat all day listening to people discussing how terrified they were of setting the cheese on fire or you could launch a fucking rocket and go there because that's what the scientists say is right. Which technique will prove more successful?
The tax burden now is as high as the economy will sustain (a bit higher actually, as we see businesses flee the US, and the only real growth is from inflation.)
https://ibeconomics.wordpress.com/2011/04/ Other sources seem to indicate it as it historic lows, so maybe you're completely wrong. The only reason you see manufacturing leaving is because other countries have a slightly more lax attitude to slave labour. If it makes you feel better maybe you should campaign for that, at least you'd be being honest.
Maybe they are too busy correcting people who are even more wrong?
Like pitch, phase alignment volume discrepancies? I think you'll find those are all measurable and more easily discerned by a good ear.
You mean people are all so well fed we couldn't possibly use any more food? Or maybe food is just too cheap because there's far too much?
And they always deal in absolutes.
There are laws against slander aren't there? If you feel you have been I'm sure you can test your case in the courts.
How about instead of worrying about making weapons safe when it turns out you've armed the wrong guys (yet again) you instead consider not arming them in the first place? Revolutionary, I know.
I think you've failed to realise why Juries are present at a trial. You might THINK they are to strictly interpret the law. You would be wrong.
If only we could think of a way to make these deadly weapons safe.
Exactly, the problem is that America is once again taking the NRA option let's "arm the good guys"! How about you stop throwing fuel on the fire in the middle east rather than trying to throw it on the right bit.
Aren't border always drawn by cartographers? That is their job.
Leased medallions are a tax, bought ones are an investment, I'd have thought a free marketeer like yourself would prefer the latter. As I said earlier, imagine it more like owning a shop on a busy street.
You idiot.
At least look at the links I gave before rambling off down your predetermined path.
Oh noes $NewEnemy "represents a new and previously unimaginable threat to our existence and must be stopped by any means possible".
There's a reason kamikaze planes didn't have wheels on them, and it's not only because they weren't needed. See if you can figure out that riddle.
Hardly, just that people can cut corners and make a living in the interim.
http://www.bl.uk/world-war-one... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P... Does that mean "forever ignorant"?