I wonder if they could make curved/angled monitors.
I would love to not have a gap between my monitors, but not if that means I could not have them at different angels. And their are many other technical hurdled that would need to be overcome first. Right now my two monitors are the only thing that prevents every app that likes to be full screen from taking over my entire desktop.
Personally, I am starting to think that multiple monitors with no borders would be a million times better than giant single screens.
How will games/movies ever hope to find the space to fit the 4 times increase in storage size?
So, movies will now have to come on multiple BR disks? And forget 12 gig games, you actually think that any publisher is going to want to release 50 gig games, that in a retail setting will require two BR disks to fit?
Can a normal human even tell the difference between an HD and 4K HD screen?
With my 4 year old 1680x1050 monitor I normally find that games, at most, go up to my resolution, and most play by default at around 3/4 of it. And just because you can set a game to play in a resolution, does not mean they are not just stretching all the pixels.
I watched the whole thing because of this review, and it was by far the worst TOS episode, it has some very faithful/good parts, but just does not make any sense.
Give us trek that none trekies at least has a chance of liking.
Being faithful to the original series is all well and good, but your market is extremely limited. Far far more limited than just producing good modern Trek. I love TOS, but even most trekies do not consider it the best series.
We need to reclaim Trek from the horrible things JJ has done, and you are not going to do that with something that 10 thousand people are going to watch.
This question is stupid. It would not matter if he was the most honest, intelligent, and experienced security expert in existence, he would tell you the same thing, do not trust him.
First off, obviously the comment can only apply to cultures with the same dating style of procreation and dislike for baldness. And some Asian culture of liking bald men, has no effect on the genetic mutation of the North American group. And I did not say it would be been bread out thousands of years ago, but that it would of been bread out generations ago.
If boldness significantly effected dating it would not take thousands of years to get rid or it. Something that visible, wholly genetic, black and white, and directly to do with procreating would sort it self out in a handful of generations.
All devices need to be aware of themselves. Know exactly where their memory bytes are, how to use its processor, and output to the screen. Devices could not function without a highly detailed and absolute awareness of self.
Because how could you ever "believe that you have freewill" without knowing that "I" exists?
Of course you would not need self-awareness to have freewill, if it existed, but I think you always need self-awareness to be contemplate about yourself.
Did the article imply that the clock was use in that way at all? The body read sthe clock and then decides to recede a hair line, put in a few more grays, or make your bones more brittle?
I would imagine a clock like this is used more for general maintenance, knowing when a cell needs replacing/cleaning/replenishing.
So is that why he likes illegals so much? He cannot legally lock the doors, but he can send a few border patrol cops after anyone who leaves before he says they can?
Sounds horrible.
No, people absolutely do not feel powerless, they just do not care, if they are even aware.
1% might feel powerless, but that is probably an exaggeration.
I wonder if they could make curved/angled monitors.
I would love to not have a gap between my monitors, but not if that means I could not have them at different angels.
And their are many other technical hurdled that would need to be overcome first. Right now my two monitors are the only thing that prevents every app that likes to be full screen from taking over my entire desktop.
Personally, I am starting to think that multiple monitors with no borders would be a million times better than giant single screens.
How will games/movies ever hope to find the space to fit the 4 times increase in storage size?
So, movies will now have to come on multiple BR disks? And forget 12 gig games, you actually think that any publisher is going to want to release 50 gig games, that in a retail setting will require two BR disks to fit?
Can a normal human even tell the difference between an HD and 4K HD screen?
With my 4 year old 1680x1050 monitor I normally find that games, at most, go up to my resolution, and most play by default at around 3/4 of it. And just because you can set a game to play in a resolution, does not mean they are not just stretching all the pixels.
What episode did you watch?
I watched the whole thing because of this review, and it was by far the worst TOS episode, it has some very faithful/good parts, but just does not make any sense.
The story is absolute crap.
Give us trek that none trekies at least has a chance of liking.
Being faithful to the original series is all well and good, but your market is extremely limited. Far far more limited than just producing good modern Trek. I love TOS, but even most trekies do not consider it the best series.
We need to reclaim Trek from the horrible things JJ has done, and you are not going to do that with something that 10 thousand people are going to watch.
I think they should bring back Abraham Lincoln as a permanent character.
This question is stupid. It would not matter if he was the most honest, intelligent, and experienced security expert in existence, he would tell you the same thing, do not trust him.
To function it would need both perception and knowledge of self.
But it also has those things in general.
First off, obviously the comment can only apply to cultures with the same dating style of procreation and dislike for baldness. And some Asian culture of liking bald men, has no effect on the genetic mutation of the North American group.
And I did not say it would be been bread out thousands of years ago, but that it would of been bread out generations ago.
If boldness significantly effected dating it would not take thousands of years to get rid or it. Something that visible, wholly genetic, black and white, and directly to do with procreating would sort it self out in a handful of generations.
"but sadly the greatest minds and resources where focused on conquering hair loss and prolonging erections."
Possibly you are only seeing sun bleaching?
Do the men with different colour beards wear hats all the time?
If baldness prevented dating, it would of been solved generations ago.
That it is not tells us that it does not significantly effect dating.
Public perception is incredibly important if you are looking to have or maintain a job, procreate, find a marriage partner, etc.
I shaved my head a month ago, and it made me look like 35-45 year old hardened criminal.
So if you are interested in living in the wilderness alone, that is a reasonable solution.
How could any device fail a self-awareness test?
All devices need to be aware of themselves. Know exactly where their memory bytes are, how to use its processor, and output to the screen. Devices could not function without a highly detailed and absolute awareness of self.
Because how could you ever "believe that you have freewill" without knowing that "I" exists?
Of course you would not need self-awareness to have freewill, if it existed, but I think you always need self-awareness to be contemplate about yourself.
readable*
It is hardly even unreadable.
Specifically, the test is to determine if the taker is likely to think it has freewill.
Did the article imply that the clock was use in that way at all? The body read sthe clock and then decides to recede a hair line, put in a few more grays, or make your bones more brittle?
I would imagine a clock like this is used more for general maintenance, knowing when a cell needs replacing/cleaning/replenishing.
Experience > Education > Schooling > Degrees
But Zuckerberg needs the illegals to accomplish his "come as close to [locking people in the buildings as possible]"
So is that why he likes illegals so much? He cannot legally lock the doors, but he can send a few border patrol cops after anyone who leaves before he says they can?
It is "AN author", not "A author".