Well, he did promise to make what the White House does more transparent to the American voters. So maybe it was a pilot script for the new reality TV series, "Obama's House"
Or both machines could've been honey pots that just had a bunch of files named [x]InvasionPlan.doc
where x = [Russian, Chinese, Korean, Iranian, French, Canadian]
Just to scare the shit out of anyone who thinks that either candidate is going to start getting chummy with foreign powers.
The fact that you blindly attack O'Reilly for anything he does shows your bias. Your arguments have no basis as they are just hurled insults instead of any facts whatsoever. Go enjoy whatever show on MSNBC that you prefer, and leave reality to the rest of us.
Oh, to even further destroy your argument, just yesterday on the O'Reilly Radio Factor, there was a caller who was basically asking O'Reilly if he thought that people should be afraid of a hard left liberal agenda being pushed through now that the Democrats had control of the White House along with a good majority of both the Senate and the House. His response (don't remember verbatim) was basically that based on his interview with Obama and what he's seen of Obama's other interviews and public speeches, that he felt that Obama was very pragmatic and a realist by nature and that he felt that Obama had to steer left to rally his base but that Obama would most likely govern from near the center. That's not verbatim, like I said, and I don't have a membership to O'Reilly's website so if the transcript is there I have no access to it, but it's pretty close to what he said. I do not blame you for not knowing this, you sound like someone who has probably ever listened to his radio show or watched his TV show, but don't attempt to speak intelligently on a subject that you know nothing about. It just makes you look even more idiotic to everyone but the complete morons.
Just to add to my point, an article detailing a meeting between Obama and Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes and also Owner Rupert Murdoch regarding what Obama felt at the time was unfair treatment by Fox News. This story was written by a writer for the Washington Post, which endorsed Obama for President, so I doubt that they'd do anything to try to make Fox News look good and Obama look bad, and the writer told it like it was. Both sides cleared the air, Obama at that point agreed to come on O'Reilly's show, and Aires told him to give him a call if he felt he was getting a bad rap from Fox News. Note that there are zero stories of that call ever taking place, and Obama staffers have many times cited that since that point, Fox News has been nothing but fair to him. Hell, Fox has hardly talked about anything but Obama since he won, other than of course about Michael Crichton passing away, which is a truly sad story considering he was always one of my favorite writers.
Furthermore, O'Reilly never insists that his show is anything but a pundit show, and distinguishes that from the position he had while working in Denver where he was a news reporter, not a pundit. There is a distinct difference and the requirements for each job are different. O'Reilly has been called unfair by both liberals and conservatives, which I think is hilarious. In reality he is fair to everyone but doesn't put up with people trying to spin their way out of answering or trying to put out bs answers. Yeah, he's a bit of a jerk, but that doesn't make him in the tank for anyone. And to further my point even more, once it was put out there that no weapons of mass destruction were likely to be found and that some of the intelligence regarding the whole matter was invented, O'Reilly blasted Bush pretty harshly for it and pretty much said that he had no further use for President Bush.
Watch the massive interview that O'Reilly had with Obama. He even asked Obama at the end if he thought he had been even and fair with him, and Obama concurred that he had.
Yeah and I'm guessing you aren't a regular viewer of his show or regular listener of his radio show. Show me something that indicates his heavy hate for Obama or shut the fuck up. I want to see facts, not your personal bias. Yeah, thought so...
There are a lot of sore losers in the Republican camp at the moment, but can you blame them? The same would've happened on the Obama side had McCain won. I think one of the most important things that Obama can and should do first is to try and bring the nation back together. The partisanship in this country has created a vicious divide between Liberals and Conservatives.
Actually O'Reilly has been more fair and accurate in terms of his coverage of Obama than almost anyone on the news. Stop reading from the Liberal Talking Points and learn to think for yourself for five fucking seconds.
Plenty of corrupt politicians on both sides that still have a say so in Washington. Personally I'm all for making mandatory term limits for every single person who serves as an elected official in Washington.
Fix Bush's financial mess? So I guess Barney Frank, the Democratic controlled Congress over the last two years, and general massive corporate greed that the Bush Admin tried to warn Congress about in '03 had nothing to do with it. Keep drinking that Kool-Aid. The mess was certainly a bipartisan affair, and anyone who thinks otherwise either is ignorant to all of the facts or just delude themselves to thinking that this was just "Dumb ole Bush at his old tricks again."
All I know is, the excuse that it's the Republican's faults won't fly in 4 years if things are still a mess. And I don't want to hear the crap about how "It will take longer than 4 years to clean up GWB's mess." You said you will deliver us change, now is put up or shut up time.
This and other complaints is why I think Android will gain a lot of traction once a good number of manufacturers are on board. Having HTC already made a device, and Motorola on board, it's only a matter of time before more devs see this as a way of competing with the iPhone on a software level.
This will make people in Australia and New Zealand cry. I pay $45 a month for 10/1 with zero cap. And I've not seen one instance of behind the scenes throttling yet (do alot of multimedia streaming - the wife and I love watching tv shows on the net, internet gaming - WoW, etc, and also do a lot of downloading - Fileplanet.com, tasteful semi-possibly clothed female art viewing *wink wink* and other various perfectly legal downloading *nudge giggle nudge*
You make one big wrong assumption here. You assume the software modifications will go as planned and nothing will be wrong with it and therefore it'll be a one-time cost. First off, I've worked for an ISP that drastically changed the way they track usage and manage ports and it went horrible. It caused so many people to get false AUP captures that it was a fucking nightmare for me as a tech support person answering the phones. Was shut off after a while. Also, you assume that the software, once installed, will not need to be maintained. There is always a cost over time in new software because you need people to maintain and upgrade/service it. That means an increase in the staffing they have on hand, or outsourcing the support to the company that provides the software. Either way, that's extra periodic cost, not a one-time deal.
I was worried about the durability of the slider as well but I can honestly say that it is very sturdy indeed. As a matter of fact I'm posting this from the G1.
My only gripe with the G1 so far is that there is no soft keyboard and that you cannot manually rotate the screen no matter what app you are in (the browser supports this but each app has to support it on its own). Both of these features are already in the works and the soft keyboard is slated for 1st Q of 09.
Slashdot Mirror
No need to invent it. Just ask Hiro Nakamura what the effects are.
Well, he did promise to make what the White House does more transparent to the American voters. So maybe it was a pilot script for the new reality TV series, "Obama's House"
Or both machines could've been honey pots that just had a bunch of files named [x]InvasionPlan.doc where x = [Russian, Chinese, Korean, Iranian, French, Canadian] Just to scare the shit out of anyone who thinks that either candidate is going to start getting chummy with foreign powers.
Sounds like a good plot for a typical James Bond movie.
The fact that you blindly attack O'Reilly for anything he does shows your bias. Your arguments have no basis as they are just hurled insults instead of any facts whatsoever. Go enjoy whatever show on MSNBC that you prefer, and leave reality to the rest of us.
Oh, to even further destroy your argument, just yesterday on the O'Reilly Radio Factor, there was a caller who was basically asking O'Reilly if he thought that people should be afraid of a hard left liberal agenda being pushed through now that the Democrats had control of the White House along with a good majority of both the Senate and the House. His response (don't remember verbatim) was basically that based on his interview with Obama and what he's seen of Obama's other interviews and public speeches, that he felt that Obama was very pragmatic and a realist by nature and that he felt that Obama had to steer left to rally his base but that Obama would most likely govern from near the center. That's not verbatim, like I said, and I don't have a membership to O'Reilly's website so if the transcript is there I have no access to it, but it's pretty close to what he said. I do not blame you for not knowing this, you sound like someone who has probably ever listened to his radio show or watched his TV show, but don't attempt to speak intelligently on a subject that you know nothing about. It just makes you look even more idiotic to everyone but the complete morons.
Just to add to my point, an article detailing a meeting between Obama and Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes and also Owner Rupert Murdoch regarding what Obama felt at the time was unfair treatment by Fox News. This story was written by a writer for the Washington Post, which endorsed Obama for President, so I doubt that they'd do anything to try to make Fox News look good and Obama look bad, and the writer told it like it was. Both sides cleared the air, Obama at that point agreed to come on O'Reilly's show, and Aires told him to give him a call if he felt he was getting a bad rap from Fox News. Note that there are zero stories of that call ever taking place, and Obama staffers have many times cited that since that point, Fox News has been nothing but fair to him. Hell, Fox has hardly talked about anything but Obama since he won, other than of course about Michael Crichton passing away, which is a truly sad story considering he was always one of my favorite writers. Furthermore, O'Reilly never insists that his show is anything but a pundit show, and distinguishes that from the position he had while working in Denver where he was a news reporter, not a pundit. There is a distinct difference and the requirements for each job are different. O'Reilly has been called unfair by both liberals and conservatives, which I think is hilarious. In reality he is fair to everyone but doesn't put up with people trying to spin their way out of answering or trying to put out bs answers. Yeah, he's a bit of a jerk, but that doesn't make him in the tank for anyone. And to further my point even more, once it was put out there that no weapons of mass destruction were likely to be found and that some of the intelligence regarding the whole matter was invented, O'Reilly blasted Bush pretty harshly for it and pretty much said that he had no further use for President Bush.
*whoosh*----*boom*
The sound of the joke flying at mach two above your head.
Watch the massive interview that O'Reilly had with Obama. He even asked Obama at the end if he thought he had been even and fair with him, and Obama concurred that he had.
Well, if he had been eligible to vote, I'm assuming he'd have voted for Obama. He could play World of Warcraft and get paid.
I guess that's why he was suing GWB, since Bush used the weather machine to create Hurricane Katrina.
Yeah and I'm guessing you aren't a regular viewer of his show or regular listener of his radio show. Show me something that indicates his heavy hate for Obama or shut the fuck up. I want to see facts, not your personal bias. Yeah, thought so...
There are a lot of sore losers in the Republican camp at the moment, but can you blame them? The same would've happened on the Obama side had McCain won. I think one of the most important things that Obama can and should do first is to try and bring the nation back together. The partisanship in this country has created a vicious divide between Liberals and Conservatives.
Actually O'Reilly has been more fair and accurate in terms of his coverage of Obama than almost anyone on the news. Stop reading from the Liberal Talking Points and learn to think for yourself for five fucking seconds.
Plenty of corrupt politicians on both sides that still have a say so in Washington. Personally I'm all for making mandatory term limits for every single person who serves as an elected official in Washington.
Fix Bush's financial mess? So I guess Barney Frank, the Democratic controlled Congress over the last two years, and general massive corporate greed that the Bush Admin tried to warn Congress about in '03 had nothing to do with it. Keep drinking that Kool-Aid. The mess was certainly a bipartisan affair, and anyone who thinks otherwise either is ignorant to all of the facts or just delude themselves to thinking that this was just "Dumb ole Bush at his old tricks again."
All I know is, the excuse that it's the Republican's faults won't fly in 4 years if things are still a mess. And I don't want to hear the crap about how "It will take longer than 4 years to clean up GWB's mess." You said you will deliver us change, now is put up or shut up time.
This and other complaints is why I think Android will gain a lot of traction once a good number of manufacturers are on board. Having HTC already made a device, and Motorola on board, it's only a matter of time before more devs see this as a way of competing with the iPhone on a software level.
Where do you live? I live in the Florida panhandle and haven't seen even a hint of anything that is not "unlimited."
This will make people in Australia and New Zealand cry. I pay $45 a month for 10/1 with zero cap. And I've not seen one instance of behind the scenes throttling yet (do alot of multimedia streaming - the wife and I love watching tv shows on the net, internet gaming - WoW, etc, and also do a lot of downloading - Fileplanet.com, tasteful semi-possibly clothed female art viewing *wink wink* and other various perfectly legal downloading *nudge giggle nudge*
You make one big wrong assumption here. You assume the software modifications will go as planned and nothing will be wrong with it and therefore it'll be a one-time cost. First off, I've worked for an ISP that drastically changed the way they track usage and manage ports and it went horrible. It caused so many people to get false AUP captures that it was a fucking nightmare for me as a tech support person answering the phones. Was shut off after a while. Also, you assume that the software, once installed, will not need to be maintained. There is always a cost over time in new software because you need people to maintain and upgrade/service it. That means an increase in the staffing they have on hand, or outsourcing the support to the company that provides the software. Either way, that's extra periodic cost, not a one-time deal.
Man, those rates totally remind me of ISDN charges in Germany in the late 90's when I lived there on a US Military Base.
Did I read you right? $10,000 per Gb?! Might as well just say One Million Dollars! mwahahaha
I was worried about the durability of the slider as well but I can honestly say that it is very sturdy indeed. As a matter of fact I'm posting this from the G1. My only gripe with the G1 so far is that there is no soft keyboard and that you cannot manually rotate the screen no matter what app you are in (the browser supports this but each app has to support it on its own). Both of these features are already in the works and the soft keyboard is slated for 1st Q of 09.
Who said we're talking about the mermaid version? I'd think the human version would allow for higher density.