That's cute..
You're one of the people that think there is a difference between the democrats and the neocons in the Republican party.
Obama starting numerous wars, spying on you, and doing completely the opposite of what he said while running for office should have tipped you off.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[
What you described isn't even a democracy it is a dictatorship (not much of a difference between the two but this makes it much more clear).
The United States by law is a Republic where the vote of the majority cannot infringe the rights of the minority.
Politicians ignoring the law while their flock encourages them does not change the fact of what the law is.
The constitution already defines what the Federal Government can do and banning plastic guns is not in that list.
Of course the US government ignores the constitution (with or without a popular vote) so there is some truth to what you say.
For everyone clamoring for better availability to mental health professionals be careful what you ask for.
There is a pretty significant chance that this was partially caused by mental health professionals overdosing this kid on SSRIs which are known to cause anger, suicidal tendencies and violence.
http://www.ssristories.com/http://www.ssristories.com/index.php?sort=date&p=school
If they piss of the powers that be they might just be "indefinitely detained" by the military. Yes, thanks Obama and the traitor Democrats and Republicans in congress for gutting the constitution on 12/31.
I did watch the JS session with Ron Paul and Stewart only proved that he has a very shallow understanding of literally everything.
Of course he is a comedian that advocates a socialist system that for the past 75ish years has proven a failure in every country in which it has tried. It's sad that soe many people take their political guidance from him - might as well turn on Jerry Springer for relationship advice. No wonder this country is so screwed.
Austerity will help in the long run.
In the short run they need to:
A) Get rid of ObamaCare
B) Get rid of all of the new EPA Rules
C) Get rid of Sarbanes Oxley
D) Vow to never ever ever bail out or grant favortism to any company EVER.
E) Simplify the tax code (flat tax would be great)
F) Get rid of or severely curtail the Federal Reserve
Lies lies lies.. Sorry, FDR was by far the worse president in the 20th century. The lies that have been made up about him are so easily looked up its astounding that so many people still believe them.
These are the same people that believe you can get out of a recession by robbing from the poor through inflation and redistributing from a central bank to rich people.
You may have missed it - but we've been trying Keynesian solutions for a LONG time now.. QE1, QE2, Bush's stimulus, Obama's stimulus.
All we have to show for it is ALOT of debt and extremely high food & gas prices.
Posts like this explain why so many people think printing money (stealing) helps in recessions. Just continue to bury your head in the sand and move along troll.
The point is although it fits your pattern we KNOW that the pattern is wrong because the recession was not caused by government surplus it was caused by a bust in bogus tech stocks.
The government surplus was caused by the preceding boom which is why there is a pattern (all the taxes from the capital gains in the dot com bubble is why there was a surplus).
It would better to understand WHY there is a boom and bust cycle instead of blindly concluding that governments should go into massive debt to keep the economy running. In the current recession/depression why was there a housing boom? Why were interest rates so low yet the risk so high? It's called government and bank intervention into the free market and it's NASTY when it crashes.
The idea that government should inflate the money supply to help the economy is ludicrous.
From a moral perspective alone it is wrong. When money printing/inflation raises gas prices to $3.90/4 gallon who does that hurt? The rich? The upper middle class? No - the poor.
Keynesian economics is nothing more than an excuse for the banking and government class to take money from the people with the least power and control.
"With the exception of the Clinton surpluses"
Why exclude Clinton's surplus? We had a pretty severe recession at the end of the Clinton term which fits your pattern perfectly.
Oh, I know why. It's because although it fits an extreme high level correlation it isn't true because you know there was a bubble at the time that was popped.
Recessions are caused by booms and busts Keynesian style. The current one was caused by government / bank collaboration in the housing industry and it is being prolonged by that same monopoly intervening in the free market. Considering the US has done the exact OPPOSITE of austerity since 2008 I don't know how you can continue to argue that austerity is even related here.
So take the few remaining dollars from the poor and middle class and hand it to the rich to trickle back down? Liberals always claim to be for the poor but they don't realize that keynesian economics does the most damage to the poor and benefits the rich.
And NO that is not what got us out of the great depression. It certainly prolonged it though.
Slashdot Mirror
I hope these pages get released soon.. (not holding my breath) http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/i...
I think you are wrong. http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/i...
Unless the organization is funded by taxpayers or you own stock in the company you should mind your own business.
I would be willing to be the majority of Slashdotters in the US voted for Obama and thought Ron Paul was crazy.. doh!
none I know..
That's cute.. You're one of the people that think there is a difference between the democrats and the neocons in the Republican party. Obama starting numerous wars, spying on you, and doing completely the opposite of what he said while running for office should have tipped you off.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[
What you described isn't even a democracy it is a dictatorship (not much of a difference between the two but this makes it much more clear). The United States by law is a Republic where the vote of the majority cannot infringe the rights of the minority. Politicians ignoring the law while their flock encourages them does not change the fact of what the law is.
The constitution already defines what the Federal Government can do and banning plastic guns is not in that list. Of course the US government ignores the constitution (with or without a popular vote) so there is some truth to what you say.
Thankfully my rights aren't governed by popular opinion.
Britam was hacked recently and some of the emails (that they claim were fake) hinted this was in the works. http://www.infowars.com/hack-reveals-washington-approved-plan-to-stage-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/
For everyone clamoring for better availability to mental health professionals be careful what you ask for. There is a pretty significant chance that this was partially caused by mental health professionals overdosing this kid on SSRIs which are known to cause anger, suicidal tendencies and violence. http://www.ssristories.com/ http://www.ssristories.com/index.php?sort=date&p=school
If they piss of the powers that be they might just be "indefinitely detained" by the military. Yes, thanks Obama and the traitor Democrats and Republicans in congress for gutting the constitution on 12/31.
I did watch the JS session with Ron Paul and Stewart only proved that he has a very shallow understanding of literally everything. Of course he is a comedian that advocates a socialist system that for the past 75ish years has proven a failure in every country in which it has tried. It's sad that soe many people take their political guidance from him - might as well turn on Jerry Springer for relationship advice. No wonder this country is so screwed.
Didn't 16+ people just die from listeria from canteloupe? How come the big government FDA save them? Anyone? Anyone?
"moneyed interests" - already control us. No need to trade anything. Ron Paul is the only candidate standing up to the "moneyed interests". You should educate yourself before you speak such non-sense. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji_G0MqAqq8 http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/fiat-money-inflation-federal-reserve-2/
If you value liberty you need to suck it up and admit that Ron Paul is right and quit playing this dems/reps game. They are one and the same.
Austerity will help in the long run. In the short run they need to: A) Get rid of ObamaCare B) Get rid of all of the new EPA Rules C) Get rid of Sarbanes Oxley D) Vow to never ever ever bail out or grant favortism to any company EVER. E) Simplify the tax code (flat tax would be great) F) Get rid of or severely curtail the Federal Reserve
Lies lies lies.. Sorry, FDR was by far the worse president in the 20th century. The lies that have been made up about him are so easily looked up its astounding that so many people still believe them. These are the same people that believe you can get out of a recession by robbing from the poor through inflation and redistributing from a central bank to rich people.
You may have missed it - but we've been trying Keynesian solutions for a LONG time now.. QE1, QE2, Bush's stimulus, Obama's stimulus. All we have to show for it is ALOT of debt and extremely high food & gas prices.
Posts like this explain why so many people think printing money (stealing) helps in recessions. Just continue to bury your head in the sand and move along troll.
The point is although it fits your pattern we KNOW that the pattern is wrong because the recession was not caused by government surplus it was caused by a bust in bogus tech stocks. The government surplus was caused by the preceding boom which is why there is a pattern (all the taxes from the capital gains in the dot com bubble is why there was a surplus). It would better to understand WHY there is a boom and bust cycle instead of blindly concluding that governments should go into massive debt to keep the economy running. In the current recession/depression why was there a housing boom? Why were interest rates so low yet the risk so high? It's called government and bank intervention into the free market and it's NASTY when it crashes. The idea that government should inflate the money supply to help the economy is ludicrous. From a moral perspective alone it is wrong. When money printing/inflation raises gas prices to $3.90/4 gallon who does that hurt? The rich? The upper middle class? No - the poor. Keynesian economics is nothing more than an excuse for the banking and government class to take money from the people with the least power and control.
Lies, lies and more lies: http://www.cato.org/pubs/tbb/tbb-0508-25.pdf
"With the exception of the Clinton surpluses" Why exclude Clinton's surplus? We had a pretty severe recession at the end of the Clinton term which fits your pattern perfectly. Oh, I know why. It's because although it fits an extreme high level correlation it isn't true because you know there was a bubble at the time that was popped. Recessions are caused by booms and busts Keynesian style. The current one was caused by government / bank collaboration in the housing industry and it is being prolonged by that same monopoly intervening in the free market. Considering the US has done the exact OPPOSITE of austerity since 2008 I don't know how you can continue to argue that austerity is even related here.
So take the few remaining dollars from the poor and middle class and hand it to the rich to trickle back down? Liberals always claim to be for the poor but they don't realize that keynesian economics does the most damage to the poor and benefits the rich. And NO that is not what got us out of the great depression. It certainly prolonged it though.