This isn't getting anywhere. You say I'm susceptible, I say I'm not. The lack of impulse purchases and branded goods which I've bought (without investigating beforehand) speaks in my favour.
... possible side effects... include liver damage and, if taken by pregnant women, birth defects. Valproic acid also has dangerous interactions with AIDS drugs. In fact, one of the four patients in the study developed serious anemia because of an interaction with one of the drugs in his HAART regimen.
Those don't seem so serious to me. If the drug, in combination with other retrovirals, is found to be 100% effective* then the person would probably become viable for liver transplant. Kids who are HIV positive would probably not be eligible for the treatment, but I'd go so far as to suggest that someone who is HIV positive does not intend to get pregnant, and if they are responsible enough would abstain from sexual contact (or take precautions which would prevent pregnancy). All in all, I'd take any of those over certain death.
* = 75% reduction in latent HIV pool, according to the research at the time. Tested 4 people.
I buy food that I have tried elsewhere (parents cooking, restaurants) or which come recommended by others who enjoy the same food as me. I watch movies based upon genre, previous experiences with other movies by a particular director, reviews, friends opinions. I make good use of the Distance Selling Regulations and send it back if I don't like it, as I did just last month with the Samsung Galaxy I9000.
This doesn't mean I don't try new things. This means that when I do, I'm seldomly disappointed.
Think of the Children angle: Daylight Saving Time here makes kids walk home in twilight, where headlights are typically turned on, but totally ineffective for actually improving your view. Couple that with a cloudless day and you get low, bright sun + ineffective lighting + typically dark coloured school uniforms.
He also said the trial was discontinued. I wanted to know if that was at the patient's behest ("This explosive diarrhoea is unbearable, please send me to Dignitas so it can be over") or at the Doctors ("These bouts of explosive diarrhoea are costing far too much in laundry bills. Let's knock this one on the head, guys")
When watching a rented movie with the g/f on the TV downstairs, I start it playing and come back in 10 minutes. Usually all the trailers are done by then.
Unless you're talking about actually shortening remaining life span, or causing a permanent and severe chronic pain for the rest of their life, I'm not sure how many side effects there are which are worse than lying in a bed for the remaining few weeks of your life covered in lesions, being overtaken by various cancers, and finally dying typically from pneumonia (which is in itself enough to get most people to make serious lifestyle changes, e.g. stopping smoking).
Don't forget the immediate scrapping of our carrier fleet and the VTOL fighters / strike craft we currently use, to be replaced in 4 hears time (on budget and time, of course) with spankingly new carriers which will have bright, spankingly pretty STOL Joint Strike Fighter craft.
In 2020. Again, to budget and on time.
It's almost like they want us to be invaded. Seriously, well done Cameron, you moron.
You know the quote: If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Expect any privacy protection legislation to be poisoned to the point of uselessness (think "... to protect the rights of terrorists and paedophiles." on the end of every sentence).
It's supposedly based upon the approximate age where an adolescent can fully comprehend such ideas as consequence and responsibility. However looking at the financial markets and the state of credit records across the Western world, there's quite a proportion of full adults who are incapable of planning further than the end of the day, never mind for the future of a child.
In short, it's totally arbitrary. However, there needs to be a cutoff somewhere to prevent those who would seek to influence the impressionable mind of an emotionally immature and insecure adolescent from being prayed upon by someone who has only their own short-term satisfaction on their mind. It's an imperfect system, but it's the best society has come up with so far.
Clegg isn't the leader; The Tories were the dominant party, making David Cameron the PM. Clegg is the silver medalist Deputy PM.
The tories are looking out for the Old Boys, and the Lib Dems are saying "Yes, sir" as this is the closest they've been to being in control of the country since 1918.
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly the point of my second paragraph. Severe mental impairment or paraplegia would make me reconsider treatment.
Quality over quantity, always.
This isn't getting anywhere. You say I'm susceptible, I say I'm not. The lack of impulse purchases and branded goods which I've bought (without investigating beforehand) speaks in my favour.
Please stop repeating yourself.
They're welcome to try. They will more than likely fail.
I'm not discounting that they won't, in the future, either retry subliminal advertising or outright extortion.
God Save The Queen?
Fuck, "other anti-retrovirals"
... possible side effects ... include liver damage and, if taken by pregnant women, birth defects. Valproic acid also has dangerous interactions with AIDS drugs. In fact, one of the four patients in the study developed serious anemia because of an interaction with one of the drugs in his HAART regimen.
Those don't seem so serious to me. If the drug, in combination with other retrovirals, is found to be 100% effective* then the person would probably become viable for liver transplant. Kids who are HIV positive would probably not be eligible for the treatment, but I'd go so far as to suggest that someone who is HIV positive does not intend to get pregnant, and if they are responsible enough would abstain from sexual contact (or take precautions which would prevent pregnancy). All in all, I'd take any of those over certain death.
* = 75% reduction in latent HIV pool, according to the research at the time. Tested 4 people.
Hopefully articles on subjects pertaining to one automatically would qualify for the other, in your example.
Guy Fawkes was a terrorist. Guy Fawkes was a revolutionary.
I buy food that I have tried elsewhere (parents cooking, restaurants) or which come recommended by others who enjoy the same food as me. I watch movies based upon genre, previous experiences with other movies by a particular director, reviews, friends opinions. I make good use of the Distance Selling Regulations and send it back if I don't like it, as I did just last month with the Samsung Galaxy I9000.
This doesn't mean I don't try new things. This means that when I do, I'm seldomly disappointed.
Think of the Children angle: Daylight Saving Time here makes kids walk home in twilight, where headlights are typically turned on, but totally ineffective for actually improving your view. Couple that with a cloudless day and you get low, bright sun + ineffective lighting + typically dark coloured school uniforms.
Until you forget to wind it.
We all know that forgetting things leads to Post-It Note Nightmare No, this is not a solution.
I especially liked the part where the guy now has a legitimate reason to say to the cops "Yeah, there is a reason why I know what weed smells like."
So, side effects which are enough to put someone off taking the meds for a disease which will kill them, if untreated?
Like I said, they must be pretty significant side effects. I'd probably stop short of losing the use of my lower limbs, or severe mental impairment.
He also said the trial was discontinued. I wanted to know if that was at the patient's behest ("This explosive diarrhoea is unbearable, please send me to Dignitas so it can be over") or at the Doctors ("These bouts of explosive diarrhoea are costing far too much in laundry bills. Let's knock this one on the head, guys")
I watched Alice in 3D with the g/f.
I won't be needing the glasses again.
You sound like one of the folks who should be very afraid of this mandatory advertising. You sound susceptible.
Personally I find out about a product, or try it myself. If I can't try it, I don't buy it. I also don't return to that particular store.
Voting with your feet / wallet is actually quite easy.
I do the same with VLC on my PC.
When watching a rented movie with the g/f on the TV downstairs, I start it playing and come back in 10 minutes. Usually all the trailers are done by then.
What side effects were they?
Unless you're talking about actually shortening remaining life span, or causing a permanent and severe chronic pain for the rest of their life, I'm not sure how many side effects there are which are worse than lying in a bed for the remaining few weeks of your life covered in lesions, being overtaken by various cancers, and finally dying typically from pneumonia (which is in itself enough to get most people to make serious lifestyle changes, e.g. stopping smoking).
Don't forget the immediate scrapping of our carrier fleet and the VTOL fighters / strike craft we currently use, to be replaced in 4 hears time (on budget and time, of course) with spankingly new carriers which will have bright, spankingly pretty STOL Joint Strike Fighter craft.
In 2020. Again, to budget and on time.
It's almost like they want us to be invaded. Seriously, well done Cameron, you moron.
Why?
Take a private citizen
Kidnapping. Good start.
For the very same reason that they'd be absolutely unbeatable at poker.
Lady GaGa wrote a song about it.
You know the quote: If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Expect any privacy protection legislation to be poisoned to the point of uselessness (think "... to protect the rights of terrorists and paedophiles." on the end of every sentence).
It's supposedly based upon the approximate age where an adolescent can fully comprehend such ideas as consequence and responsibility. However looking at the financial markets and the state of credit records across the Western world, there's quite a proportion of full adults who are incapable of planning further than the end of the day, never mind for the future of a child.
In short, it's totally arbitrary. However, there needs to be a cutoff somewhere to prevent those who would seek to influence the impressionable mind of an emotionally immature and insecure adolescent from being prayed upon by someone who has only their own short-term satisfaction on their mind. It's an imperfect system, but it's the best society has come up with so far.
Clegg isn't the leader; The Tories were the dominant party, making David Cameron the PM. Clegg is the silver medalist Deputy PM.
The tories are looking out for the Old Boys, and the Lib Dems are saying "Yes, sir" as this is the closest they've been to being in control of the country since 1918.
The Register is the tech equivalent of the Daily Fail. Orlowski and Page just love shoving their opinions down your neck.
I only go there on a Friday now, to pick up the latest BOfH.
"Reasonably."
That word has no place when discussing Section 49.