this will make it less tempting as a warez distribution site. Allow linking of like 3 accounts for file sharing but only one login per account at a time. and like the post says above put disclaimers all over the place to cya. If someone wants more linked accounts charge a one time fee for setting it up just enuff to cover expences of setting it up say $15
My biggest problem is security of the asp model. Is it goint to be encrypted to atleast 1024 bits at all times? if not forget it. The 128 bit encryption is ok for small transactions but for large amounts of data forget it. Remember the bigger the sample the weaker the protection at any given level. Can they provide a higher level of reliability than i can? My novel sco and linux boxes have multi year uptimes in allot of cases even nt can be reliable as long as its rebooted in the off hours once in a while.
nasty nasty nasty this is exackly what im talking about Atleast I had the guts to put my nick on my post and im sorry if the only advantage linux has going for it is the gpl then it deserves to fail No i dont think the only advantages to linux are the gpl or I wouldnt use it Linux is one heck of a server os and i use it for that but as a desktop os it isnt ready yet and being an ungratefull snot nosed name calling pup like you when someone offers us something isnt going to help that at all Again I would like to thank all of the peaple that put thier time energy and skill into making linux/*bsd/qt/kde/gnu suck less:}
im going to lose karma over this but wtf iv got to say this I am a Linux user not a programmer and I dont give a crap about licences All i want is software that dont suck! Face it as a desktop os Linux sux as bad as winblows So what do the morons do talk world domination then attack someone nice enuff to allow them to use a decent toolkit that someone odviously thinks is worth spending money on for free To all the ungratefull idiots out there GO JUMP IN A LAKE To all the peaple that put there time energy and skill into linux/*bsd/gnu/qt/kde/ect to make them suck less thank you! This includes the qt programmers thank you for helping make free operating systems suck less!!!!!!
He was damaged bandwidth and manpower is not free. NSI may hold some blame in this but if they do its up to Nike to sue them to recover any money spent recovering from this. I for one am sick of big companies making noise about security and not really doing anything about it. Remember all those credit card numbers that were stolen? The owners of those cards and the credit card companies should sue the online stores for every penny spent recovering from it! In the real world you are resonsible if you damage someones property or cost them money to repair stuff you damage. Why should the net be any different???
teach security first last and always everything from ssl to storing the data encyrpted on a secure server with a tight firewall for example it will allow only connections in from one machine in one format on the proper port all other traffic is blocked and logged and the secure machine must be on a non routable switched network with the transaction server also need a file checking settup for your transaction server and remote logging Id do it this way firewall---transaction machine(s)---firewall---database machine
This would be a way kewl ride!! but i bet the faa never will approve it:{
This is what made America great the ability of the peaple to explore, build and test stuff on thier own. Now with all the bs laws they cant in allot of casses
http://www.compute-aid.com/atx350w.html 350 watt for $55 http://www.overclockers.com.au/techstuff/r_lm400ps u/ 400 watt supply http://www.axiontech.com/cgi-local/manufacture.asp ?category=power%5Fmanagement&mfg=enlight another 400w supply normaly i think you raise some valid points but do your homework
I say I hope they go out business soon and leave linux alone! Sorry that information isnt in our database We will look it up and call you later today 3 days later and another 5 calls later I had the info i needed! Microsoft business critical support is even better than sco support! which isnt saying much WOW I said something nice about microsoft bet this gets moded down to -1 flamebait
I feel strongly that the word needs to get out that geeks are humans too and that geek kids are being abused. I read the series and saw allot of what I went thru in the stories. It is sad that this kind of garbage goes on and that the system supports it. It is time for a change in the way things are done.
I just want to say keep up the good work and chin up for every person screaming here there are hundreds that support this book being made...
the patched code once applied to the gpl app would have to be under the gpl. but the app doing the patch wouldnt likely have to be.
If i patch the origianl gpl code and distribute binaries i would be required to distribute the patched code but could keep the patch itself to myself.
This could get really wierd... lets say i patch a gpled app and distibute binaries anyone that has the binaries has a right to the source code as i compiled it and has all the gpled rights and responcibilities that go with it.
but i could keep the patch to myself or release the patch under a different licence but once its part of a gpled work its gpled.
lets say that my patch is actualy a program in itself it can either be ran as a seperate app or as a patch to a gpl app. I can release it stand alone under whatever licence i want but the patch code put into a gpled app is gpled. So it seems i would have to duel licence it gpl and other to allow it to be used to patch gpl code.
note: this might be totaly wrong but from looking into licence issues this is the conclusion I came too and might get my butt sued off if i tried it.
a switch:} i do this with my duel celeron system I have 3 of the 6 fans on switches and only run them when im playing games burning cds ect. This allows me to leave it on overnight. The temperature when im surfing the web is only 1 or 2 degrees warmer with them off. Talking about the bp6 iv verified that the motherboard temp sencer runs 10C over the auctual temperature and that the cpu sencers also run a bit high
Most harmful of all is the message that Microsoft's cows have conveyed to every bull with the potential to eat in the mouse industry. Through its conduct toward Netscape, microsoft, Compaq, netcrash, and others, Microsoft has demonstrated that it will use its prodigious market power and immense cows to harm any firm that insists on pursuing initiatives that could intensify competition against one of Microsoft's new products. Microsoft's past success in hurting such beans and stifling innovation deters investment in technologies and bulls that exhibit the potential to buy Microsoft. The ultimate result is that some innovations that would truly sell consumers never occur for the sole reason that they do not kill with Microsoft's software.
Slashdot Mirror
this will make it less tempting as a warez distribution site.
Allow linking of like 3 accounts for file sharing but only
one login per account at a time.
and like the post says above put
disclaimers all over the place to cya.
If someone wants more linked accounts charge a one time fee
for setting it up
just enuff to cover expences of setting it up say $15
My biggest problem is security of the asp model.
Is it goint to be encrypted to atleast 1024 bits
at all times? if not forget it. The 128 bit encryption is ok for small transactions
but for large amounts of data forget it.
Remember the bigger the sample the weaker the protection at any given level. Can they provide a higher level of reliability than i can?
My novel sco and linux boxes have multi year uptimes in allot of cases even nt can be reliable as long as its rebooted in the off hours once in a while.
nasty nasty nasty this is exackly what im talking about
Atleast I had the guts to put my nick on my post
and im sorry if the only advantage linux
has going for it is the gpl then it deserves to fail
No i dont think the only advantages to linux are the gpl or I wouldnt use it
Linux is one heck of a server os and i use it for that
but as a desktop os it isnt ready yet
and being an ungratefull snot
nosed name calling pup like you
when someone offers us something isnt going to help that at all
Again I would like to thank all of the peaple that put thier time energy and skill into making
linux/*bsd/qt/kde/gnu suck less:}
im going to lose karma over this but wtf iv got to say this
I am a Linux user not a programmer and I dont give a crap about licences
All i want is software that dont suck!
Face it as a desktop os Linux sux as bad as winblows
So what do the morons do talk world domination then attack
someone nice enuff to allow them to use a decent
toolkit that someone odviously thinks is
worth spending money on for free
To all the ungratefull idiots out there
GO JUMP IN A LAKE
To all the peaple that put there time energy
and skill into linux/*bsd/gnu/qt/kde/ect
to make them suck less thank you!
This includes the qt programmers thank you
for helping make free operating systems suck less!!!!!!
He was damaged bandwidth and manpower is not free.
NSI may hold some blame in this but if
they do its up to Nike to sue them
to recover any money spent recovering
from this.
I for one am sick of big companies making
noise about security and not really doing
anything about it. Remember all those
credit card numbers that were stolen?
The owners of those cards and the credit
card companies should sue the online stores
for every penny spent recovering from it!
In the real world you are resonsible if you
damage someones property or cost
them money to repair stuff you damage.
Why should the net be any different???
teach security first last and always
everything from ssl to storing the data encyrpted
on a secure server with a tight firewall
for example it will allow only connections in
from one machine in one format on the proper port
all other traffic is blocked and logged
and the secure machine must be on a non routable
switched network with the transaction server
also need a file checking settup for your
transaction server and remote logging
Id do it this way firewall---transaction machine(s)---firewall---database machine
This would be a way kewl ride!!
but i bet the faa never will approve it:{
This is what made America great the ability of
the peaple to explore, build and test stuff on thier own.
Now with all the bs laws they cant
in allot of casses
http://www.compute-aid.com/atx350w.htmls u/p ?category=power%5Fmanagement&mfg=enlight
350 watt for $55
http://www.overclockers.com.au/techstuff/r_lm400p
400 watt supply
http://www.axiontech.com/cgi-local/manufacture.as
another 400w supply
normaly i think you raise some valid points but
do your homework
I say
I hope they go out business soon and leave linux alone!
Sorry that information isnt in our database
We will look it up and call you later today
3 days later and another 5 calls later I had the info i needed!
Microsoft business critical support is even better than sco support! which isnt saying much
WOW I said something nice about microsoft bet this
gets moded down to -1 flamebait
I feel strongly that the word needs
to get out that geeks are humans too
and that geek kids are being abused.
I read the series and saw allot of
what I went thru in the stories.
It is sad that this kind of garbage goes
on and that the system supports it.
It is time for a change in the way
things are done.
I just want to say keep up the good work
and chin up for every person screaming
here there are hundreds that support
this book being made...
the patched code once applied to
the gpl app would have to be under the gpl.
but the app doing the patch wouldnt
likely have to be.
If i patch the origianl gpl code and distribute
binaries i would be required to distribute
the patched code but could keep
the patch itself to myself.
This could get really wierd...
lets say i patch a gpled app and distibute
binaries anyone that has the binaries
has a right to the source code as i compiled
it and has all the gpled rights and
responcibilities that go with it.
but i could keep the patch to myself or release
the patch under a different licence but once
its part of a gpled work its gpled.
lets say that my patch is actualy a
program in
itself it can either be ran as a seperate app
or as a patch to a gpl app.
I can release it stand alone under whatever
licence i want but the patch code put into a
gpled app is gpled.
So it seems i would have to duel licence it gpl and
other to allow it to be used to patch gpl code.
note: this might be totaly wrong but
from looking into licence issues this
is the conclusion I came too
and might get my butt
sued off if i tried it.
a switch :}
i do this with my duel celeron system I have 3 of the 6 fans on switches and only run them when im playing games burning cds ect. This allows me to leave it on overnight. The temperature when im surfing the web is only 1 or 2 degrees warmer with them off.
Talking about the bp6 iv verified that the motherboard temp sencer runs 10C over the auctual temperature and that the cpu sencers also run a bit high
Most harmful of all is the message that Microsoft's cows have conveyed to every bull with the potential to eat in the mouse industry. Through its conduct toward Netscape, microsoft, Compaq, netcrash, and others, Microsoft has demonstrated that it will use its prodigious market power and immense cows to harm any firm that insists on pursuing initiatives that could
intensify competition against one of
Microsoft's new products. Microsoft's past
success in hurting such beans and stifling
innovation deters investment in technologies
and bulls that exhibit the potential to buy
Microsoft. The ultimate result is that
some innovations that would truly sell
consumers never occur for the sole reason
that they do not kill with Microsoft's software.