"fingerprinting" is just a catch all for various bits of information that can be combined to uniquely identify a browser. There's nothing specific to enable or disable, unless you want your browser to decline such information as window size, content-types accepted, etc. You know, now that I say that maybe it would work just fine.
Beyond this I would say the park service ought to engage in the minimal expense of putting in wilderness trails for individuals and (non-commercial) small groups to use for hiking/backpacking because putting in trails and asking even those low impact users to stay on them reduces total impact.
Is there a specific park or parks you have in mind? From what I have seen they already do what you said. I used to do a lot of mountain biking and quickly learned to check the maps to make sure any trails I used were not restricted to hiking, and there were a lot of them in wilderness areas.
Since Huawei makes so much telecom equipment it makes a kind of sense to be leery of that, but why all the attention given to the phones? There are dozens of other Chinese phone makers, and none of those are mentioned.
Right, they spent billions over the last decade or so on stock buyback programs. I wonder what Sears would be like today if they had invested that money into staying competitive?
False. "France...seem[s] to be doing fine" is EXACTLY what the parent claimed. And the Yellow Vests would indeed disagree, based on what many of them have actually said. The truth or falsehood of their beliefs is not relevant to my statement, which is they would disagree with parent's statement.
The Yellow Vests seem to disagree with you that France is doing fine. But true enough that US interference in other countries is a big factor in our refugee "crisis." Look at how we made of mess of Honduras recently.
With all due respect:), TFS should have stated as such (it uses the word "report"), or linked to something less vitriolic like the New York Post article TFA mentions. But you are right that the parent's criticisms are off base.
They are typically "not for profit" which is technically a bit different than a non-profit. I forget which, but when I worked for a hospital they said there was one class of insurance which would cover the higher prices, so they had to keep the upper level or else forego some small percentage of their revenue. True though, most people who have huge piled up medical bills don't' realize until it is too late that they can negotiate a greatly reduced sum just by calling the hospital.
It hasn't been insurance for a long time. "Health care plan" might be more accurate. Insurance is just a form of gambling, in order to hedge against unlikely events. If something is a certainty, it becomes a payment plan, since the premiums will just include the inevitable costs. That's why car warranties do not cover brake pads, oil changes, etc. Those are certainties. There are things like catastrophic coverage which are more like real insurance. That's interesting about the private side of UK health care, I'd like to learn more about it if you have any good links around.
The real price is whatever is paid. If you are the typical insurance policy holder, the real price might be $10. This whole proposal is confusing to me because I don't see where a patient would make a decision based on this price list, since insurance pays it anyway in most cases. In cases where insurance does not cover a particular procedure, the prices are crystal clear and consumers do indeed shop around.
The rock does indeed qualify. There is no wholly objective to do anything at all, ultimately all is subjective. So the rock represents a 100% rational intelligence. Until we add in an irrational drive to do something like survive, achieve the reward, etc. it will do nothing.
Citation needed. Of course, "incredibly" is subjective anyway. But apparently wealthy enough to start feeding whale sharks 50 tons of shrimps annually. Similar things happen in other places, regardless of the relative poverty of the local residents. But my point was, the paper doesn't specify whether the damage is due to direct human output like trash or boat exhaust, or just the perpetual presence of the whale sharks, it seems to be the latter.
I'm not sure, others will have a more informed opinion surely, but it seems from what I read that the problem isn't tourism, it is:
This unusual aggregation [of whale sharks] is maintained by the local tourism association feeding the whale sharks with up to 50 tons of shrimps annually.
Exactly, the current robot has to be paranoid since there are so few of them. If we actually had the technology and resources to send a human to Mars, we could likely send tens of thousands of robots.
This whole thing is just a misunderstanding of what the location permission on the smart phone does (and does not). You can bet your sweet bippy pretty much everyone does some sort of IP location based correlation. That's why you should never give your Ip address out on the Internet. Try opting out of that.
Slashdot Mirror
How about Qwant? Anyone have any yea/nay votes for that as an alternative?
"fingerprinting" is just a catch all for various bits of information that can be combined to uniquely identify a browser. There's nothing specific to enable or disable, unless you want your browser to decline such information as window size, content-types accepted, etc. You know, now that I say that maybe it would work just fine.
Beyond this I would say the park service ought to engage in the minimal expense of putting in wilderness trails for individuals and (non-commercial) small groups to use for hiking/backpacking because putting in trails and asking even those low impact users to stay on them reduces total impact.
Is there a specific park or parks you have in mind? From what I have seen they already do what you said. I used to do a lot of mountain biking and quickly learned to check the maps to make sure any trails I used were not restricted to hiking, and there were a lot of them in wilderness areas.
I can think of a few uses which might benefit from more storage per disk, such as medical imagery or over the network backup services like Backblaze.
They can pry my nutrients out of my cold dead hands.
Even with cremation the bones still have to be ground up, probably this process involves a similar step at the end.
This doesn't work, believe me I know. The cops will still find it no matter how much trash you pile on it.
Yeah, this is just a rehash of the attempts to prevent folks from using unwanted (from content provider's view) playing/recording devices.
Since Huawei makes so much telecom equipment it makes a kind of sense to be leery of that, but why all the attention given to the phones? There are dozens of other Chinese phone makers, and none of those are mentioned.
I wonder if this is a factor in their efforts to make if very hard to root their phones.
Right, they spent billions over the last decade or so on stock buyback programs. I wonder what Sears would be like today if they had invested that money into staying competitive?
False. "France...seem[s] to be doing fine" is EXACTLY what the parent claimed. And the Yellow Vests would indeed disagree, based on what many of them have actually said. The truth or falsehood of their beliefs is not relevant to my statement, which is they would disagree with parent's statement.
The Yellow Vests seem to disagree with you that France is doing fine. But true enough that US interference in other countries is a big factor in our refugee "crisis." Look at how we made of mess of Honduras recently.
With all due respect :), TFS should have stated as such (it uses the word "report"), or linked to something less vitriolic like the New York Post article TFA mentions. But you are right that the parent's criticisms are off base.
They are typically "not for profit" which is technically a bit different than a non-profit. I forget which, but when I worked for a hospital they said there was one class of insurance which would cover the higher prices, so they had to keep the upper level or else forego some small percentage of their revenue. True though, most people who have huge piled up medical bills don't' realize until it is too late that they can negotiate a greatly reduced sum just by calling the hospital.
It hasn't been insurance for a long time. "Health care plan" might be more accurate. Insurance is just a form of gambling, in order to hedge against unlikely events. If something is a certainty, it becomes a payment plan, since the premiums will just include the inevitable costs. That's why car warranties do not cover brake pads, oil changes, etc. Those are certainties. There are things like catastrophic coverage which are more like real insurance. That's interesting about the private side of UK health care, I'd like to learn more about it if you have any good links around.
The real price is whatever is paid. If you are the typical insurance policy holder, the real price might be $10. This whole proposal is confusing to me because I don't see where a patient would make a decision based on this price list, since insurance pays it anyway in most cases. In cases where insurance does not cover a particular procedure, the prices are crystal clear and consumers do indeed shop around.
No, I made no claim that I was 100% rational. So he'll have to keep looking, there's plenty of fish in the sea.
The rock does indeed qualify. There is no wholly objective to do anything at all, ultimately all is subjective. So the rock represents a 100% rational intelligence. Until we add in an irrational drive to do something like survive, achieve the reward, etc. it will do nothing.
The locals are incredibly poor
Citation needed. Of course, "incredibly" is subjective anyway. But apparently wealthy enough to start feeding whale sharks 50 tons of shrimps annually. Similar things happen in other places, regardless of the relative poverty of the local residents. But my point was, the paper doesn't specify whether the damage is due to direct human output like trash or boat exhaust, or just the perpetual presence of the whale sharks, it seems to be the latter.
This unusual aggregation [of whale sharks] is maintained by the local tourism association feeding the whale sharks with up to 50 tons of shrimps annually.
Exactly, the current robot has to be paranoid since there are so few of them. If we actually had the technology and resources to send a human to Mars, we could likely send tens of thousands of robots.
This whole thing is just a misunderstanding of what the location permission on the smart phone does (and does not). You can bet your sweet bippy pretty much everyone does some sort of IP location based correlation. That's why you should never give your Ip address out on the Internet. Try opting out of that.
the thiests aren't cocky about it.
Your ignorance of human history reveals you must be one of the aliens in question.
The term is "gentiliens"