I didn't say it was not inflationary, I said we avoid most of the inflation. There was an implied "most of the inflation some models might expect given the growth in the money supply"
Yes, they stopped stopped publishing the measures since they no longer kept to a 'target' as the parent had claimed. As far as I can tell, it stays relatively non-inflationary as long as that extra money doesn't circulate. Since a lot of it just sits in an account to polish up the banks' balance sheets we avoid most of the inflation. Plus the velocity of money is very sluggish. The financial markets are all on edge wondering when the Fed might act to pull some of it back as velocity picks up. Regardless, even if the Fed doesn't track those measures there are plenty of other people who still do.
You completely understood the term "monetary growth target". The "target" is the key word here, where the Fed would say that they wanted growth in the money supply to match some target. In 2000 they stopped issuing the money supply target. This was back when they claimed there was some connection between money supply and economic results. Now they don't make that claim for the most part and have even stopped tracking certain measures of money supply.
You make a great case for more regulation, we can't have people improving their lives like this! Next thing you know people will be hiring their paperboy to do brain surgery.
Isn't it obvious? Since any disparity with proportions in the general population can only mean some sort of deliberate discrimination, we are forced to conclude that Silicon Valley is unfairly biased in favor of Asian people.
Not changing the boarding order was a judgement call. Threatening to call the police over a critical tweet wasn't a judgement call, that was execrable behavior and the person making that decision should be fired.
Frank Herbert wrote in a few of his sf novels about a Bureau of Sabotage that did essentially that, gumming up the efforts of other government agencies
Or if you like, Coke v. Pepsi is not a good analogy because those products are substitutes for each other. A hydrogen fuel cell car is not a substitute for a gas car, people will not simply switch from one to the other due to price concerns. There are a lot of other factors, such as availability of fueling stations, proximity to qualified service providers, and so on. So the people who will buy the fuel cell car are going to buy one regardless. all this handout will do is add the $20k to the price for the manufacturer to profit. Now if the supporting infrastructure for both types of cars were identical, the analogy might be more apt. But in that case there would be no supposed need for the handout would there? Perhaps the money might be better spent building out fuel stations instead of just effectively handing it out to a politically favored car manufacturer.
Slashdot Mirror
relatively
"Ethically and morally" is so ridiculously redundant that I...that I....ah nuts. Blanked. So there!
The devices will be locked in a temperature-controlled cart between games to prevent any team from manipulating the information.
Huh? How is temperature control going to prevent manipulation?
Your sig is so grammatically wrong that I can just assume the rest of anything you say is also wrong and not worth anyone's time to read.
Let's hope at least that they are driving electric cars back and forth.
I didn't say it was not inflationary, I said we avoid most of the inflation. There was an implied "most of the inflation some models might expect given the growth in the money supply"
Yes, they stopped stopped publishing the measures since they no longer kept to a 'target' as the parent had claimed. As far as I can tell, it stays relatively non-inflationary as long as that extra money doesn't circulate. Since a lot of it just sits in an account to polish up the banks' balance sheets we avoid most of the inflation. Plus the velocity of money is very sluggish. The financial markets are all on edge wondering when the Fed might act to pull some of it back as velocity picks up. Regardless, even if the Fed doesn't track those measures there are plenty of other people who still do.
Ugh of course that first line should say "misunderstood"
You completely understood the term "monetary growth target". The "target" is the key word here, where the Fed would say that they wanted growth in the money supply to match some target. In 2000 they stopped issuing the money supply target. This was back when they claimed there was some connection between money supply and economic results. Now they don't make that claim for the most part and have even stopped tracking certain measures of money supply.
What monetary growth target is that? The one they stopped setting in July of 2000?
You make a great case for more regulation, we can't have people improving their lives like this! Next thing you know people will be hiring their paperboy to do brain surgery.
Or perhaps, it is like saying the term "Iran" can be seized after a lawsuit.
Isn't it obvious? Since any disparity with proportions in the general population can only mean some sort of deliberate discrimination, we are forced to conclude that Silicon Valley is unfairly biased in favor of Asian people.
Judge for yourself, looks counterclockwise to me
Well, the US government is already doing this so the Russkies are behind again.
I think he means plate tectonics, as in the land mass that would be Siberia was a lot further south at that point.
Not changing the boarding order was a judgement call. Threatening to call the police over a critical tweet wasn't a judgement call, that was execrable behavior and the person making that decision should be fired.
And now all the pot farming is going to make it even worse.
I don't see how yet another huge unaccountable Federal agency is going to resolve the problem.
1. Write software to sandbox $APPLICATION
2. Release report exaggerating "increase in vulnerabilities" in $APPLICATION
3. Profit!
I think you should call this "SecurityBrick 3000" and tout its security features more.
A BHO is essentially the same thing as an extension, that is just what Microsoft calls it.
Frank Herbert wrote in a few of his sf novels about a Bureau of Sabotage that did essentially that, gumming up the efforts of other government agencies
If you cross your boarders they may not pay the rent, then where will you be?
Or if you like, Coke v. Pepsi is not a good analogy because those products are substitutes for each other. A hydrogen fuel cell car is not a substitute for a gas car, people will not simply switch from one to the other due to price concerns. There are a lot of other factors, such as availability of fueling stations, proximity to qualified service providers, and so on. So the people who will buy the fuel cell car are going to buy one regardless. all this handout will do is add the $20k to the price for the manufacturer to profit. Now if the supporting infrastructure for both types of cars were identical, the analogy might be more apt. But in that case there would be no supposed need for the handout would there? Perhaps the money might be better spent building out fuel stations instead of just effectively handing it out to a politically favored car manufacturer.