Slashdot Mirror


Jesse Jackson: Tech Diversity Is Next Civil Rights Step

theodp writes: U.S. civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson called on the Obama administration Monday to scrutinize the tech industry's lack of diversity. "There's no talent shortage. There's an opportunity shortage," Jackson said, calling Silicon Valley "far worse" than many others, such as car makers that have been pressured by unions. He said tech behemoths have largely escaped scrutiny by a public dazzled with their cutting-edge gadgets. Jackson spoke to press after meeting with Labor Secretary Tom Perez for a review of H-1B visas, arguing that data show Americans have the skills and should have first access to high-paying tech work. Jackson's Rainbow Push Coalition plans to file a freedom-of-information request next month with the EEOC to acquire employment data for companies that have not yet disclosed it publicly, which includes Amazon, Broadcom, Oracle, Qualcomm and Yelp. Unlike the Dept. of Labor, Jackson isn't buying Silicon Valley's argument that minority hiring statistics are trade secrets. Five years after Google's HR Chief would only reassure Congress the company had "a very strong internal Black Googler Network" and its CEO brushed off similar questions about its diversity numbers by saying "we're pretty happy with the way our recruiting work," Google — under pressure from Jackson — fessed up to having a tech workforce that's only 1% Black, apparently par for the course in Silicon Valley.

514 comments

  1. Silicon Valley shakedown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Follow the money.

    1. Re:Silicon Valley shakedown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best way to address this lack of Blacks in technology is to go head to head competition with the white boys and beat the pants off of them. The example of Marc Hannah, founder of SGI comes to mind.

      Silicon Graphics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_Graphics
      Wikipedia
      Early systems were based on the Geometry Engine that Clark and Marc Hannah had developed at Stanford University

    2. Re: Silicon Valley shakedown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Requirements for job: Masters or Bachelors degree and You have to be Asian or White Sir!

  2. Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Step #1 would be for not allowing people to look down on those who are smarter. Way too many people in the USA make it a point of pride that they are dumb.

    1. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Preach it brother, freedom ain't free.

    2. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      people

      Way too many people avoid naming names when dealing with race, even in stories that directly cite "black." It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      If we're going to talk race then lets talk race. Lets talk about how few blacks are employed in tech, and lets talk about why so few blacks are actually employable in tech.

    3. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I interviewed someone today who had a 3 year degree in electronic engineering. He did not know Ohm's law.

    4. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By which I meant that you can't tell who is qualified by just looking at a piece of paper. Nothing to do with gender, age or nationality/origin.

    5. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ohm's law is handled on 4th year.

    6. Re:Stop the idiocracy by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      It's hardly limited to that.

      * The 20% of the country's land area called "the bible belt", especially the more rural chunks of it fit neatly into that box.

      * Enough of the boob-tube watching population that it's a trope second only to "oafish husband-father/long-suffering wife-mother."

      * All of Washington DC.

    7. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A three year degree in 'electronic engineering' means it wasn't someone with an Electrical Engineering degree from an accredited college. Since degrees are either two or four year, it also means that dude probably took three years to complete the two year Associate's degree.

    8. Re: Stop the idiocracy by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      probably because it was electronic engineering...

    9. Re: Stop the idiocracy by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Degrees are not always 2 or 4 years (or 6, or 7), but can vary by degree. While the usual EE degree is normally a 4-year Bachelor's program, that is not always the case.

      Most likely, you are correct, the Electronic Engineering degree is not the EE degree the parent expected.

    10. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Quirkz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Something about resistance is futile, right? Or is that Borg's law?

    11. Re: Stop the idiocracy by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Or he's from Quebec, and he's got an 11th grade primary education and some sort of 2+ year degree there...

    12. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its taught in grade 10 Physics in India.

    13. Re: Stop the idiocracy by imatter · · Score: 1

      I have met plenty of people who claim to have gone to college for this or that because they took some electives at a junior college that had something to do with the major they were claiming they were there for.

      I would think that the "electronic engineering" would have given it away though. I don't know any EEs that call it electronic engineering.

    14. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      This shouldn't be considered flamebait. He's absolutely right. Black culture isn't the only culture that disparages intellect. Corporate culture and rural religious culture also both disparage it quite vehemently. Don't get me wrong though, ... at least if you're white you don't ALSO have to contend against the racism prevalent in both cultures...

    15. Re:Stop the idiocracy by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      I'd be interested in your source for this particular tidbit, particularly how it shows blacks are any worse than whites in this regard.

      I went to high school with a lot of tough white guys from South Boston and Charlestown in Boston, back when Whitey Bulger was still a big deal in Southie. Let me tell you most of them didn't see intellect as their path into the middle class. A few did, but not many. I've also worked with PhD scientists who were black and came from urban black neighborhoods. You get a mix of attitudes everywhere, whether it's in a black ghetto or white ghetto or a middle-class white neighborhood, but usually being academically advanced doesn't make you popular unless you live in town with a big Jewish population.

      Speaking of Whitey, his people used to spread the myth that he kept drugs off the street in Southie. In fact he was kicking the Italian mob out of Southie so he could have the drug trade all to himself. Whitey wasn't a hero, he was a parasite. So why did people believe the lie? Wishful thinking. The people who got education and became professionals moved out of the neighborhood, so the one example of guys who rose in life that you saw every day were the mob. And you had to hope they were good lads at heart, because they had the neighborhood by the balls.

      There's often a "we're all in this together" thing going on in poor, downtrodden neighborhoods. Part of that is a resentment of anyone who acts like their above the rest, and that includes people who flaunt their education or sophistication. But that's because intellectual accomplishments don't seem to be within the reach of everybody. You don't get that attitude in cultures which believe in self-improvement.

      So let's *not* talk race. Let's talk education and economic opportunity. If people have a way up, see that way, and believe they can do it, they will rise.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:Stop the idiocracy by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      I don't even know how you could show that even if it were true. It's not exactly the most objective of claims.

      When I was in college I did witness a tour group of middle school (I'm guessing) aged kids that were almost all black, and when the tour guide (who was trying to get them interested in attending college) asked them what they wanted to do as a profession, all the boys answered either "basketball player" or "rapper". The girls' answers were more varied.

      When I see this kind of thing, I am usually the first to point out that this is probably more to do with poverty than skin color, but the fact remains that there is still a high correlation between poverty and skin color. So whether you want to call it "black culture" or the black version of the general culture of poverty, the end result is still that a disproportionately high number of black kids are not being brought up in a culture that respects intellect (At least not the kind that results in interest in science and engineering).

      I don't know if lack of education is causing a culture of ignorance, or whether a culture of ignorance is causing a lack of education, but I suspect it's a positive feedback loop, and I don't have a good answer for how to fix it, other than suggesting that ignoring this problem, and pretending that everybody is equally likely to be qualified regardless of race and the only problem is racism, is probably not going to do anybody any good.

      I don't want to discount the effect of racism, but I don't think it's the only problem.

      So let's *not* talk race. Let's talk education and economic opportunity. If people have a way up, see that way, and believe they can do it, they will rise.

      I agree, but I think this trick of picking yourself up by the bootstraps is easier said than done. I know I have had a lot of advantages that others probably didn't (i.e. parents that had a good education, and forced my siblings and I to get a good education), and that's something that's pretty hard to create out of nothing.

      Who knows, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe "fake it till you make it" is as good a strategy as any.

    17. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      Sorry friend, but there's plenty of poor white trash willing to celebrate their "redneck" roots and hold up how proud they are to be ignorant, too.

      It's not a racial trait.

    18. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I interviewed someone who had a four year degree in EE, had five years of work experience, and didn't know what a diode did. We hired him. He's white.

    19. Re: Stop the idiocracy by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      ugh.. V=IR is handled in highschool these days, in physics.

    20. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Boronx · · Score: 1

      "So let's *not* talk race. Let's talk education and economic opportunity. If people have a way up, see that way, and believe they can do it, they will rise."

      Maybe, but you take a white kid who sees a path up through education takes it, graduates, applies for job, and his competition is a black guy who did the same thing, more likely than not, it's the white guy who gets a job.

      Something I found out only yesterday. After the 2008 crash, unemployment for black college grads jumped to 8%, but for white college grads it only went to 4%.

    21. Re:Stop the idiocracy by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      people

      Way too many people avoid naming names when dealing with race, even in stories that directly cite "black." It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      No, they are by far not the only ones to disparage intellect. Basically, anyone who is not intellectual, competes with intellectuals, or whose goals are opposed by intellectuals, are likely to disparage intellectuals because it is advantageous to them to do so (odds are, they do this without knowing the reason but rather because that is what their group does). In the case of people who are not intellectual, they have the further reason that they inherently devalue intellectual pursuits as demonstrated by their own choice (or resentment, if it was not their choice).

      Just to give a racially biased example, Republicans tend to be rich, white, and to disparage intellectuals. Democrats will disparage intellectuals only on a case-by-case basis of those who's opinions or scientific results are "wrong", while being generally supportive of intellectuals. Groups such as a class where the bottom percentage would fail had the seemingly ironic quality of being extremely viscous and mocking of high achievers, while trying their hardest to be one. And all kinds of other groups of various races are disparaging of intellectuals.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    22. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking about "Tennis is irrelevant", and it's Björn Borg's law

    23. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... at least if you're white you don't ALSO have to contend against the racism prevalent in both cultures..."

      YES THEY DO! I offer the quoted sentence as an example. Most whites are not born rich. God himself does not descend from heaven to wipe their asses. People organize themselves into insular groups. If you aren't part of a particular group, they will not give you the benefit of the doubt and you'll have to go above and beyond to be accepted/respected. Whites deal with the same bullshit universe as everyone else.

    24. Re:Stop the idiocracy by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Did the study take majors and school into account? If the black college grad population has a much higher percentage of degrees in social sciences versus technical degrees, that could be a part of the difference. It is likely that a large percentage of blacks got degrees from less prestigious black colleges compared to whites.

      Just a couple of factors that could account for some of the gap.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    25. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Borg's Law says, "On grassy courts, play the long game. On clay courts, charge the net frequently."

      This is in contrast to McEnroe's Law, which says, "There is no such thing as a bad shot, just @#$%ing blind judges who can't (&@%#!ing see the #&$@ing ball landing in (or out) when it was right in front of their @!$#ing faces!!!"

    26. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is so racist.

  3. He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

    If there isn't a minority in there they are not smart enough.

    It's bad enough we have to deal with the Indians and Chinese with their H1B Visas and working practically for free, the last thing we need to do is be forced
    to work with someone who can't carry their own weight.

    1. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

      Ah, yes. The good ol' meritocracy. The dream of capable men and women everywhere. No more having to put up with coworkers that are incapable of doing the work. Just like not a single profession anywhere, ever. (Except maybe prostitution, but even that could be up for debate.) The fact is, being smart has very little to do with it. Getting the job done is what matters.

      If there isn't a minority in there they are not smart enough.

      You think. Or maybe there's racism in areas that aren't directly part of the job, but are part of getting the job. Like education (check) or HR (check). Of course, then it needs to be said that Mr. Jackson needs to focus his efforts elsewhere, and there's just not any money in that, so good luck.

      It's bad enough we have to deal with the Indians and Chinese with their H1B Visas and working practically for free, the last thing we need to do is be forced to work with someone who can't carry their own weight.

      We already have to work with those that can't carry their own weight. I've worked with plenty of Indians, and fully half of them were below average. The other half were good enough to get their work done (which is what matters). I've never worked with any Chinese. But of the mix of white and black (yes, black!) people I've worked with, there was always only a 50/50 chance of any single person being good at their job. These people were from various nationalities and environments. Some had years of experience, others were so green they needed mowing. And they were always a mixed bag. 50/50 is about the best you can hope for.

    2. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've worked with plenty of Indians, and fully half of them were below average.

      I know, right? And 40% of the days they take off are either Mondays or Fridays.

    3. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by jythie · · Score: 0

      Problem is, intelligence is stereotyped. White males are assumed to be smarter, women and blacks are assumed to be less capable. Hand 10 hiring managers the same resume with names that sound male or female, black or white, and the managers have been shown to rate the white male named resume highest in terms of perceived competence and talent.

      Tech is not about finding the smartest workers, it is an echo chamber where social prejudice is taken as natural and confirmed.

    4. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by ilsaloving · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is this modded insightful? It's complete and utter bullshit.

      Overseas workers work cheaper, and put up with more crap than domestic workers. It has nothing at all to do with skill level... it never did. It's pure corporate greed.

    5. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As an Indian American, while I agree with the spirit of your comment, please remember that we are just as badly affected by the H1B visas as any other Americans.

      Unfortunately, we are all cast in the same light, our background, academic qualifications, or experience notwithstanding.

    6. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When most of the candidates get flushed based on their job applications and resumes, that say absolutely nothing about race, then how can there be racism in the process?

      Are you saying that someone in HR looks at a resume and says "gee - Tyrell sounds like a black person, flush....."

      I doubt it, it's possible, but I doubt it.

      If that was the case, then we'd have to anonymize the resumes and applications.

      Applicant logs in to submit resume and application - name is replaced with an application-id, that only gets looked at if and when it's time to call the applicant in for an interview.

    7. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.nber.org/digest/sep...

      The National Bureau of Economic Research sent out 5,000 resumes to 1,300 jobs randomly assigning black or white sounding names to the resumes. The black sounding names received 50% less callbacks than the white sounding names.

    8. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by jxander · · Score: 1

      Source?

      Sounds like an interesting study. I'd be interested in reading it.

      --
      This signature is false.
    9. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was kinda the point. :)

    10. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think anyone who listens to anything Jesse Jackson says with any sense of seriousness doesn't get it. This man is so racist and ignorant, inflammatory etc, that anytime you even listen to read or remark on his mindless drivel you are lining his pockets and giving credibility to a professional troll. We all know you should never feed trolls.

    11. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then it's easy. Don't use black sounding names.

    12. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't just smart enough people, it is a broken nerd-bro culture in Silicon Valley.

      http://carlos.bueno.org/2014/06/mirrortocracy.html

    13. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did they also receive 50% fewer callbacks, or were the callbacks they received only of poorer quality?

    14. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      This is BS. Human beings still do the hiring, not impartial computers. Humans like to hire humans that are like them; similar personalities for sure, but also similar races, same gender, same schools, same religion, people who dress similarly, and so forth. Maybe it's not overt but humans have bias, even geeks.

      Meritocracy is just another way to maintain the status quo, and ignores that there are real problems preventing people outside of the privileged groups from getting the necessary education.

    15. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is correct, we need more white players in the NBA.

    16. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source?

      Sounds like an interesting study. I'd be interested in reading it.

      Seriously, there's a lot of these, including a linke half a page above your reply: http://www.nber.org/digest/sep03/sep03.pdf

      This almost qualifies for a LMGTFY link...

    17. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The desis you work with carry their own weight?

    18. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this one then, my graduating class for BS in EE had a total of 0 blacks. My masters CS program has a total of....you guessed it, 0 blacks. Could part of the problem be that there simply aren't very many black people with the right degrees?

    19. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by worldthinker · · Score: 1

      If you can't even get an interview then it isn't about smarts is it?

    20. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dot or feather?

    21. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      This is a false dichotomy. It's not that there is either only stereotyping, or only real differences in qualifications. It's probably both. In fact the stereotypes and lack of qualified applicants of certain types probably feed off eachother.

      I don't expect qualified tech applicants to look like a perfect cross section of society, any more than I would expect the USA to win the world cup. It's not that the world cup was rigged. We are just not as good at soccer (yet).

    22. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then obviously the problem is discriminatory practices against blacks a the university you attended.
      or they couldnt get a student loan because they were black.
      or they were too poor to go to school and be interested in EE and CS because they were black.

      it always boils down to someone else holding them back from succeeding.
      ps, interchange "black" with "asian", "female", "gay", or any other distinguishing feature for even more fun

    23. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windex.
      er... feather

    24. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be a citizen, now, but if you were brought in via h1b you still count as part of that population.

    25. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      One of my best friends is American-born of Indian ethnicity and his parents immigrated legally way before there were H1B Visas. Last I heard he was the lead developer for a $600 million project. He certainly didn't get position through AA.

    26. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://www.nber.org/digest/sep...

      The National Bureau of Economic Research sent out 5,000 resumes to 1,300 jobs randomly assigning black or white sounding names to the resumes. The black sounding names received 50% less callbacks than the white sounding names.

      So is "Jesse" a black sounding or white sounding name? What about "Malcolm" or "Martin"? (Just borrowing the names of three of the most famous black civil rights activists as examples.) Or in order to be "black sounding" does a name have to also indicate a socio-economic status (which will also inevitably conveniently conflate your results)?

    27. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

      That's the fucking definition of equal rights.

      If there isn't a minority in there they are not smart enough.

      Ah the old *ism doesn't exist because I say so argument.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    28. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

      That's the fucking definition of equal rights.

      Not anymore... there's a big confusion over equal opportunity vs equal outcome. Conservatives typically believe in equal opportunity, liberals mostly believe in equal opportunity with some leanings towards equal outcome (that is the justification for affirmative action).

      If you don't believe me, look up the legal terms "disparate impact" and "unintentional discrimination."

      Another example is from a few years ago in the height of the financial crisis. When banks tightened credit requirements for loans, there was disparate impact against blacks. Same standards being applied to everyone, but blacks were affected more. Apparently that is racist, e.g. http://racism.org/index.php?op... says

      In a recent article, attorneys at K&L Gates asserted "even the most basic lending standards, such as credit scores and [loan-to-value] requirements, impact' racial and ethnic groups differently." While some in the financial industry have recently discussed the existence of the disparate-impact theory under the Fair Housing Act and other long-established laws, all eleven circuit courts that have considered the matter recognized disparate impact as a legally acceptable means by which parties can assert claims under the Act.

    29. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Not anymore... there's a big confusion over equal opportunity vs equal outcome. Conservatives typically believe in equal opportunity, liberals mostly believe in equal opportunity with some leanings towards equal outcome (that is the justification for affirmative action).

      Well that's the thing. Conservatives like to believe we already have equal opportunity and the disparity is just due to the intake. They use that to dismiss affermative action.

      The fact remains there is not equal *opportnity*. Affermative action does help to correct that.

      There was an article here posted about CVs in some context (academic?). The CVs were of course made up allowing the researchers to perfectly control for the content. CVs attached to "black" sounding names were consistently rated worse.

      That means they were not being given equal opportunity.

      Affermative action corrects for that.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    30. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know he came in on an H1B? For all you know, he may have been born here.

      Also, he could have very well come here for school, or married an American, or any number of other reasons.

      Or are you hating on every immigrant in this country?

  4. Experience outside the valley by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

    1. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

      This seems to only happen in a government setting. Am I right?

    2. Re:Experience outside the valley by tofu2go · · Score: 2

      Might have something to do with the fact that the African American population is greater in the south than anywhere else in the United States. In Louisiana and Georgia for example the African American population is around 30%. In California, African Americans make up only about 6% of the total population. Perhaps the demographic of the local workforce is a reflection of the local population?

    3. Re:Experience outside the valley by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so I hope and expect Jesse Jackson to really kick off and promote the workforce equality such that it is truly representative of the local population's ethnic ratio.

      If that means more white workers have to be hired then I expect him to be promoting more white guys.... won't hold my breath waiting for that to happen though!

    4. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former government worker, I can tell you: no. Its far and above closer to the 75% mark in the public sector. With so many in the workforce getting automatic preference points, paths for advancement as a white male are practically nonexistent... which is why I'm back in the private sector. Even in an office full of H1Bs, the workplace is far more equitable than with the Feds.

    5. Re:Experience outside the valley by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      In the firmware development group I work in we actually have a good amount of diversity.
      We will hire anyone with talent.
      The lack of opportunity is not in the hiring area. It is in the home and education. Hiring someone because of race is bigotry. I doesn't matter if the race happens to be anglo or african descent.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people who work at Google and other silicon valley companies aren't generally from the local area. these are highly recruited people from tech companies. rarely do you find someone who went to the local high school

    7. Re:Experience outside the valley by jythie · · Score: 1

      It does tend to be a somewhat localized effect. Generally any particular community tends to hire and retain people like themselves, so places that have reasonably good representation tend to maintain it, while places where it is bad tend to resist shifting it. The lack of blacks or women in the local developer community is taken as proof that such people are generally not fit to work in tech and when viewing candidates or new hires through that lens creates a self fulfilling prophecy.

    8. Re:Experience outside the valley by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

      Obviously, the rest of them came from Asia, right? :D

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

      This seems to only happen in a government setting. Am I right?

      No.

      I work in the private sectory, about a third of my technology coworkers are minorities, with a nice cross section of cultures represented - we literally have people representing every continent except Austrailia and Antarctica.

      I'm not in Silicon Valley, but in the Pacific Northwest.

    10. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, we're all of African ancestry. It all has to do with when our ancestors left Africa.

    11. Re:Experience outside the valley by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Based on what? I could say that you see it because the government is a bastion of political correctness where people are chosen based on quotas rather than on experience, and the statement would have the same validity.

    12. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former government worker, I can tell you: no. Its far and above closer to the 75% mark in the public sector.

      It just looked like 75% because you find black people so scary.

      Fact is, in many government offices, what you're actually seeing is a more representative workforce for the community in which you live. You're not used to seeing that because racism is so pervasive in hiring.

      Having worked at, and visited numerous govt. agencies for nearly forty years, I can safely say, your assessment is bullshit. It is in no way representative of the community, and very much driven by quotas.

    13. Re:Experience outside the valley by ruir · · Score: 1

      Might it well be that there are quotas. Having lived and worked in Africa for almost a decade, I think quotas are evil, in more than a couple of ways. It is really hard to have to choose people based on their race, than on competence.

    14. Re:Experience outside the valley by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I could say that you see it because the government is a bastion of political correctness where people are chosen based on quotas rather than on experience

      You could say you're Superman too, but that won't give you x-ray vision.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your red herrings aside, I never said it was a poor representation of the community. Indeed, the area I'm talking about was 65%+ African American, so it makes complete sense for the workforce to reflect that. Of course, that was the entire point of the GPP... maybe you should brush up on your reading comprehension before you go around accusing people of being racist.

    16. Re:Experience outside the valley by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      So if it's a representation of the community, why would you believe it has anything to do with affirmative action? The "point" of the GPP was that black people are "takin' ar jerbs".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It made no such assertion. It merely stated that, in the south, where, as we've covered, there is a higher concentration of African American population, the workforce is typically more representative of that fact than it apparently is in Silicon Valley. Similarly, my reply to the response that this is only the case in government jobs was meant to highlight that government is, in fact far more representative than the poster thought. There's nothing about "dem darkies takin' ar jerbs" -- the implication of racist motivations came wholly from you, each time.

      As to Affirmative Action, not that I agree this is the cause, that comment was directed specifically at promotion. With a workforce so dramatically racially one-sided, and all the baggage that comes with that, coupled with the government-required preference points that dictate hiring into any Federal position, my anecdotal experience showed that advancement as a white male was simply not a realistic expectation. Whether that is an institutional, systemic problem, I leave to the reader... I have only my own experience to rely upon, and I do not suggest that it is universal.

  5. Confusing position by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm confused... is Jackson arguing for more Americans, or more black people, or more black Americans, to get tech jobs?

    After listening to Jackson over the years, it's now almost a reflex for me to argue against his statements. But I'm still sketchy on what they are in this case.

    1. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no confusion, that racist is arguing specifically for black people. Not Americans in general or anything else. Instead of trying to get the government to lay down yet more regulations, he should really reach out to his communities and educate the vast majority of black people so they can get these tech jobs. The majority of black people live in low income areas and rarely ever leave. He needs to stop asking for handouts and actually start helping the people he claims to be helping.

    2. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> is Jackson arguing for more Americans, or more black people, or more black Americans, to get tech jobs?

      Whatever gets him paid.

      http://www.solargeneral.com/jeffs-archive/black-civil-wrongs/jesse-shakedown-jackson-gets-beer-distributorship-for-son/

    3. Re:Confusing position by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reverse discrimination. Jesse Jackson is putting race, not skill level, as the priority imputes to employ more blacks. In his world view, society must bend over backwards to cater to the African American.

      Hey Jesse!!! Yeah you. They don't want to be an Uncle Tom. The idea of "white" culture (a culture of being educated and the further pursuit thereof) is what may of the blacks are against. Those that you represent value ignorance over everything else. For them, they derive power through victimization; and the liberal society is all to willing to go along with the coddle-fication of victimization attitude!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Confusing position by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    5. Re:Confusing position by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination since they put a higher value on some races than they do others?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:Confusing position by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His arguments are, "pay attention to me so I can use the plight of African-Americans to fatten my own bank account."

      In fact, that's the only argument he and Sharpton have ever had. I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:Confusing position by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      It may have been necessary to break the barriers, but at some point, the barriers are gone, and the only thing holding people back are the people themselves. There is NO REASON why black people can't succeed in America. After all, we have an unqualified "black" (half) man as President, simply because we're still threatened by "Racist" reverse slur being tossed out. After six years in office, he still can't seem to figure out when it is his fault when the shit hits the fan. I mean, still holding "race" or "GWB" or those "evil Republicans" is pretty lame leadership technique.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Confusing position by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      I think MLK is going to be too busy spanking his kids for eternity after the way they've fought over and tarnished his legacy these past few decades.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    9. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination since they put a higher value on some races than they do others?

      It can be. Sometimes it is called possitive discrimination. However, I think you misunderstand what affirmative action law actually requires employers to do in the United States. It does not require quotas. Infact, quotas are illegal.

    10. Re:Confusing position by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination since they put a higher value on some races than they do others?

      At some point they become discrimination and defeatist in nature to everyone involved with society. But I am also a realist, and understand that at one point there was a need to have these practices in place in the U.S. And I think that they will still exist in some form or another, but not enforced. There are many industries in the US who's work force is not diversified at all or are becoming of one particular background.

        What is a proper percentage of bodies of a particular ethnic background/gender/sexual preference/religious preference is a company to have? Is it guided by local community, state community, country population, or world population?

      Frankly, I could care less. This is still the U.S. and if you can't work for someone, go start your own business and fight for your business. Life is not fair. The sooner you accept that and move on, the happier you will be.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    11. Re:Confusing position by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination...

      No and yes (in that order).

      The executive orders that comprise the basis of affirmative action order government agencies and contractors (1) not discriminate in hiring on the basis of race, religion, national origin, or sex and (2) to collect data in order to understand if their hiring practices are leading to over- or under-representation of certain groups, determine why that discrimination exists, and fix the problem if possible. The whole point of affirmative action is to take steps to *stop* discrimination on the basis on the basis of certain criteria that should be irrelevant (such as, again, race, religion, national origin, or sex) not to intentionally discriminate on these bases in order to rectify some historic inequality.

      Quotas are inherently discriminatory.

    12. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I liked how you put that, can be read multiple ways...

      Half-black man or Black Half-man - interesting concept... or is it Half-Black Half-man - perhaps we already have the first hermaphroditic president and nobody knows it.

    13. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Economy recovering? Check
      Debt going (way) down? Check
      Pulling out of wars? Check
      Health care for all? Check

      I'm sorry, while you may feel that this president has failed and that all sorts of bad things are his fauly those of us who are a little more objective disagree. I know that it's in vogue to bash the guy but try thinking a little bit for yourself please....

      P.S. I did vote for the guy, he seemed way better than the other guy who thought strapping an open dog carrier to the roof of his car was "okay" among other things. When I pulled that lever I didn't give two shits what color he was and I still don't. Watching the Repub antics I'm glad I did!

    14. Re:Confusing position by jxander · · Score: 2

      While true, reverse- just indicates that it's opposite of the norm.

      When Mega-Maid went from suck to blow, it could be characterized as reverse-flow. But really, there's no such thing. Flow is flow.

      --
      This signature is false.
    15. Re:Confusing position by jeIIomizer · · Score: 2

      Continuing and even sometimes expanding the egregious violations of the constitution and people's fundamental liberties of the last administration and all his buddies in congress? Check. P.S. I did vote for the guy, he seemed way better than the other guy who thought strapping an open dog carrier to the roof of his car was "okay" among other things

      You are the problem. You and your ilk only ensure that candidates from The One Party win time and time again. Both parties are filled with evil scumbags, and voting for either of them is the same as supporting all the various constitutional and rights violations that these people advocate. Voting for 'the lesser of two evils' is simply a self-fulfilling prophecy; third parties won't win because they won't win because assholes like you won't throw away your irrational fear of wasting your vote and just vote for them. They don't even need to win; getting a significant number of votes will send a message to candidates from The One Party.

      Regardless of any of that, voting for evil scumbags should make anyone with any sort of principles and a love for freedom want to vomit.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    16. Re:Confusing position by Feyshtey · · Score: 1

      Then by your definitions, the current federal hiring practices are discriminatory. If you're applying for a position in federal govt you get additional preference for that position if you are female and/or a member of a minority. All else being equal, a woman, or a member of a minority, or a minority woman will be hired for a position that an exactly equally qualified white male also applied to. (Veteran status is another factor, which I actually happen to agree with. But that's a different discussion.)

      --
      "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
    17. Re:Confusing position by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Economy Recovering (For Wall Street, mainstreet still at unacceptable unemployment)
      Debt Going down (Sequestration, in spite of horrors by Liberals about "government shutdown')
      Pulling out of wars (while Russia invades multiple countries annexing them at will, Hamas/Israel, Syria, Libya, Iraq ..... )
      Health Care for all (Not watching the news about Federal Case regarding Fed Exchange ...)

      How about Open Boarder Invasion from the south, causing massive harm to the environmentally threatened South West? (Check)
      IRS Lying in attacks against conservatives (check, check, check and ... "Not a smidgeon of corruption" .. check)
      Support of Islam at every step, while ignoring the plight of Christians (and others) world wide. (check)
      Golfing and fundraising instead of actually doing his job (Check)
      Another Multimillion dollar Vacation (check)

      And the "other guy" (Romney) was mocked for saying exactly what is happening today in Ukraine. Obama is the pigeon on the chessboard of the world, strutting around knocking pieces over.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    18. Re:Confusing position by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I am a Libertarian. I haven't voted for a "winning" candidate in a very very long time. You talk about the "one party" yet vote for them. You are the problem because you're a hypocrite.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    19. Re:Confusing position by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      Then by your definitions, the current federal hiring practices are discriminatory.

      First, those are not my definitions. Those are the definitions in law, as per executive orders 10925 and 11246 (the orders establishing affirmative action). It is a clever rhetorical trick to imply that the person to whom you are responding is using some wacky definition out of left-field, but it is kind of dishonest.

      Second, I did not claim that federal hiring practices were non-discriminatory. What I claimed is that affirmative action is non-discriminatory, as it specifically claims to be about ending discrimination, in large part through the collection of data about hiring practices.

      Finally, can you prove (or even provide solid evidence) of your claim that federal hiring practices are discriminatory? I don't claim to be an expert, and I would be willing to believe that such discrimination exists were you (or someone else) to provide evidence of such. That being said, your evidence would have to run counter both to my own experience and the stated policies of the federal government.

      For my own experience, I did seasonal work for the BLM and Forest Service a decade ago, and the stated hiring policy was not to discriminate on the basis of race, religion, etc. In fact, USAJobs doesn't necessarily collect demographic information aside from status as a veteran and some information about disabilities. I can't speak from personal experience regarding the practices of contractors, but they are supposed to be held to the same standard.

      Beyond my own anecdotes, the Department of Labor states that their policy is not to discriminate except to give veterans preference and to "... take affirmative steps to employ qualified individuals with disabilities." ([1], emphasis mine). Other relevant laws and regulations can be found on the Department of Labor's website, including the following which relate to equal opportunity employment: [2] and [3] (relating to executive order 11246, the current law-of-the-land regarding affirmative action), and [4] (relating to the preference given to veterans).

    20. Re:Confusing position by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      No, I don't vote for either republicans or democrats. What made you think that I do, given what I said?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    21. Re:Confusing position by fat_mike · · Score: 0

      I just ran out of mod points but I'd give you every mod point from here on for that comment. You are spot on.

    22. Re:Confusing position by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      "P.S. I did vote for the guy, he seemed way better than the other guy who thought strapping an open dog carrier to the roof of his car was "okay" among other things"

      If it was that, well, that was supposed to be a quote.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    23. Re:Confusing position by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Jesse Jackson is putting race, not skill level, as the priority imputes to employ more blacks.

      No he isn't. He is saying that black people need more opportunities to get those jobs, i.e. more access to training that is lacking in the areas where many black people live. Rather than going after H1B visas the tech companies should be trying to bring better education to parts of America that are not well served, but there is a lot of stigma associated with them that prevents it happening.

      You are projecting your own feeling of persecution onto what it he says, rather than paying attention to what he actually said.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I think many people would argue that.
      If you can show that a company is declining applicants based on race, sue them, fine them whatever.
      But artificially demanding that a certain percentage of a race should be hired regardless of qualifications is BS.

    25. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem I see with affirmative action is it is today is simply that hiring alternative races should come with perks, if they can't find someone of the minority race then they hire the person they can find, they just don't get the perks. If they hire bad employees of the minority race then they get a productivity hit and essentially lose money, if they are hire a good employee of minority race then they get the productivity boost and maybe a tax incentive.

      If you can't find someone who is a minority then you hire the person you can hire, get the productivity boost and no tax incentive. This would require some balances however to make sure that people aren't just hiring minorities for tax purposes.

      It's a tough problem to solve, it's hard to instill a respect for education for inner cities kids of any race without them having a place to land a good job. You have to provide a place for them to jump to. As a white dude in an already shark like environment I'm not too eager to see changes like this happen but I understand they are probably for the better good of society as a whole.

    26. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's true that life is not fair, and that's why there are people out there to make it fair (albeit more fair for some than others)

    27. Re:Confusing position by c · · Score: 1

      I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      I'm pretty sure they're going to a different place than MLK.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    28. Re:Confusing position by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      They're illegal, but happen all of the time anyhow. It's only a matter of getting caught or not.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    29. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are smart and understand tech, you can get paid in this business. If you know someone who is in high school in the projects and thinks there is no way out for a young black man, tell him to learn to code or learn network and systems management, or any other of dozens of tech areas. If you are smart and work hard, you'll do well, whatever your background.

      Finding good tech workers is hard. There is greater need than there is supply. (note the emphasis on good.... there may be plenty of below average folks who tried to jump on the tech bandwagon during the boom years - but most tech work requires above average talent and drive. )

    30. Re:Confusing position by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      You heard it here first, CanHasDIY is advocating that MLK go to Hell and/or that the devils' jobs be outsourced to black people.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    31. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it does.

    32. Re: Confusing position by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      While I admit that it's a bit of a chicken / egg problem, there's no reason for an African American to not get both the training and education required to land an interview and do the job.

      As with all the race-baiters and those that fall for their BS, he's conflating race and culture. I still contend that as with women in IT, African Americans don't want to be a part of the IT culture too. So why force the issue as a corporate responsibility? That's the underlaying issue I have with his message.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    33. Re:Confusing position by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      You heard it here first, CanHasDIY is advocating that MLK go to Hell and/or that the devils' jobs be outsourced to black people.

      Lol, that cracked me up!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    34. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were incredibly lucky to have the permeating example of self-victimization that the conservatives champion so much, else they'd never have perfected it so. When it comes to wanting an advantage over everyone else via whining, conservatives are the objective standard on how to achieve that.

      Citation: Turn on any right wing talk radio station at all, at any time. They make Jesse Jackson sound like Gandhi.

    35. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reverse discrimination is a term white people like Rush Limbaugh use to perpetrate and describe what it's like when people are "racist" to white people. It's one of the most disgusting terms I've ever heard. Racism is racism... this whole idea about "reverse" racism is a term secretly racist people use to try and justify being defensive of ones race. Let's get it straight people... racism is racism, hate is hate and that's it. Stop identifying and relating yourself to your own race as if people of your own color give a crap about you anyways... and yes, I'm white so don't try pulling the race card on me.

    36. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perpetuating his own self-victimization. I wish conservatives could understand that terminology, as there would suddenly be much less of them, as the intelligent ones realize how hoodwinked they've been for their entire lives :/

    37. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economy recovering? False
      Debt going (way) down? False
      Pulling out of wars? Shouldn't he have done that years ago?
      Health care for all? False

      The false claim that the economy is recovering has already been addressed. For the other points, consider the following:

      1. The Congressional Budget Office has recently estimated the amount of publicly held federal debt for each of the next 10 years. In 2014, the debt is $12.7 trillion. By 2024, the debt will be about $21.3 trillion. Hardly a case of debt going down, let alone way down! You may be confusing deficit with debt.

      2. Obama Health Care is over 2000 pages of new law. The equivalent law in most countries is 20 pages. The primary beneficiary of this new law will be the lawyers. Any law or precedent that makes the legal system overly complex is a violation of the right to ethical practice of law arising under the 9th Amendment, which means everybody involved in passing or upholding this law violated their oaths to uphold the Bill of Rights!

      Health care reform would be nice (perhaps on the Swiss model), but Obama failed here. Not necessarily his fault. The US legal profession refuses to acknowledge many fundamental ethics limitations on their conduct, and has for such a long time that unethical practices riddle the US legal system and pretty much all the senior people are worthless.

      I'm sorry, while you may feel that this president has failed and that all sorts of bad things are his fauly those of us who are a little more objective disagree.

      Apparently, when you say "a little more objective" you mean "massively misinformed".

    38. Re:Confusing position by marvinglenn · · Score: 1

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      The modifier reverse implies that it's discrimination that's purported to be done for the purpose of correcting discrimination. It does not give any more advantage to one group, at least anymore than the original discrimination.

      --
      The whores get mad when the sluts give it away for free.
    39. Re:Confusing position by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      It was that. Sorry.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  6. RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Posting as A. C because you are afraid to face the Black Man.
     
    Comander Taco, Now is the time for a -1 RACIST moderation to put these peope in there places!

    1. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Posting as A. C because you are afraid to face the Black Man.

      Comander Taco, Now is the time for a -1 RACIST moderation to put these peope in there places!

      And that's EXACLTY how the Jesse Jackson shakedown works.

      "Do what I say or I'll call you a RAAAAAACIST!!!"

      Jackson really should patent that. It's a hell of an effective "business" method.

    2. Re:RACIST! by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And that's EXACLTY how the Jesse Jackson shakedown works.

      "Do what I say or I'll call you a RAAAAAACIST!!!"

      Jackson really should patent that. It's a hell of an effective "business" method.

      Well, I have seen racism in dev shops before, to be sure, but not the sort that Reverend Jackson wants shakedown money for. I've worked for more than one place where "white men born in America" were about 2% of engineers. Normally, it's just not an issue, but at one place the racism was so bad that everyone not of the preferred race left over the course of 6 months after a shift of management. (Not saying what that race was, as the problem was just a couple of assholes, and not a more general problem).

      I've also seen straight-up redneck racist at the first dev shop I ever worked at, back when we rode dinosaurs to work, but that company was so exploitive that racism only makes the middle of its list of abuses.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Most of the other Civil Rights leaders have died of old age. Why can't Jesse?

      Just die already.

    4. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Black Googler Network"

      What a bunch of racists! I wonder how strong the "White Googler Network" is. Or the "Hispanic Googler Network". Or the "Men's Googler Network".

      What a bunch of race hustling, shake-down artists.

    5. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jesse Jackson is the worst Racist evarrrrrrr..

      Butttt, buttttt, butttt I'm BLACK, I MUST BE PROTECTED AND GIVEN PREFERENCE BECUZ I"M BLACKKKKKKKKKKK

      Sorry Jesse, you're butt-hurt.

      Find qualified people who actually applied for the positions and were rejected because of their race, then you might have a leg to stand on, otherwise, here's a case of shut-the-fuck-up.

    6. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yehaw! style racists are getting kind of rare nowadays in anything not construction or business. Tech tends to not attract these kinds of guys.

    7. Re: RACIST! by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Insightful

      in there places

      Come now, that's hardly proper Ebonics; you've got the wrong pronunciation and spelling. :p

      On a more serious note, I'd never judge anyone by their skin color or ethnic background... but their behavior and cultural attitude, that's goddamned fair game. And I'm willing to bet that if you insist on "acting black," I'm not likely to find your abilities any more impressive than if you act like whitetrash or a dumb hick. Reality may be a bitch; what she isn't is a racist. ;)

    8. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he started it along with al sharpton, and because of that, we have obama as president

    9. Re:RACIST! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      im not sure, i think al sharpton is a bigger racist

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    10. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Posting as A. C because you are afraid to face the Black Man.

      Comander Taco, Now is the time for a -1 RACIST moderation to put these peope in there places!

      And that's EXACLTY how the Jesse Jackson shakedown works.

      "Do what I say or I'll call you a RAAAAAACIST!!!"

      Jackson really should patent that. It's a hell of an effective "business" method.

      Prior art anti-semite!

    11. Re:RACIST! by Notabadguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jesse has a point, but only so far as he takes it across the board. If we're pushing for affirmative action in tech, then it should apply everywhere. Including professional sports. I think it's only fair that NBA teams show a mandatory 10% white men with equal playtime on the court, 10% asian, and 5% latino.

    12. Re:RACIST! by Notabadguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, and I think that every Society for Black Engineers needs a counterpart Society for White Engineers.

    13. Re:RACIST! by craigminah · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Likewise, tech doesn't attract young black men and women because studying math, science, tech, and computers in school isn't cool. We need to make it cool so everyone gets an education worth a dam in our country. Until then, placing minorities in positions because they're a minority is doing a disservice to those who actually study and do well in school and it puts underqualified people in positions which weakens our tech fields. It all goes back to families then schools,

    14. Re:RACIST! by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      There is a legitimate problem, though, that a disproportionate number of degree holding blacks aren't working in their field. The CEO of McDonald's is an EE. He's not doing bad for himself these days but you have to wonder why he couldn't establish a career as an engineer.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    15. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh... he DID work as an engineer - for Northrop Grumman, and McDonald's. The fact that he's now CEO of McDonald's after several promotions and increasing responsibilities suggests that he *did* establish a career as an egineer, and it led to him being named CEO of a major multinational corporation.

      I suspect he's "established a career" as an engineer in a far more successful manner than you have.

    16. Re:RACIST! by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      > tech doesn't attract young black men and women because studying math, science, tech, and computers in school isn't cool.

      No, because the jobs are all going offshore. And what isn't going offshore is being done by visa workers.

      The future for tech jobs in the USA is grim.

    17. Re:RACIST! by lgw · · Score: 1

      So, wait, the problem is that the wrong minorities are doing the jobs? This is complicated.

      There are plenty of open developer jobs in the US. Heck, we have several on my team we can't fill. I strongly suspect people complaining about this either just don't make the cut, or don't want to move to where the jobs are.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:RACIST! by napulist · · Score: 1

      Your thesis is ingenious. A fucking swiss watch, if i understand it correctly. Let me try to break it down here:

      The Problem:
      * Black people are not employed in the tech sector in representative numbers

      The Cause:
      * Black people only do things that are cool
      * Studying math/science/tech is NOT cool
      * Black people's families are also terrible

      The Solution:
      * Make education cool (It's the only way to motivate black people!)

      It's all so simple now.. so obvious. I mean, when you put it that way, even a black person might be able to understand it! (ha ha YEAH RIGHT, AMIRITE?? ha ha! they are so dumb!!!)

    19. Re:RACIST! by erikkemperman · · Score: 0

      This is +5 Insightful?

      I get that some people feel that affirmative action has been taken too far. I also get that some feel that it actually has a detrimental effect on the supposed beneficiaries. I don't claim to know either way.

      But it looks to me as if racism, the bad old ugly kind, is very much alive in the USA (and many other places). So it seems unhelpful, to say the least, to ridicule people who are attempting to fight it -- whether you agree with their particular approach or not, we need more of those people.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    20. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I would argue that Obama being called "black" by everyone is a pretty good indicator of racism being very much alive in the US. He's as much white as he is black, I figure. But no, everything less than 100% white gets rounded "down" to black.

      The suggestion that Sharpton and/or Jackson are somehow the cause of Obama's presidency (much though I am disappointed by how much he is the same as the last two, three decades of presidential scum) is ludicrous.

    21. Re:RACIST! by craigminah · · Score: 1

      That's a good point but why are these jobs going offshore? Is it because we can't do the jobs or is it because they can get the job done for less pay? Probably a combination of the two.

    22. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when scientists and engineers and computer programmers make as much fame and fortune as basketball players and bring back the bling to where they grew up.

      Try stopping the pay of entertainers and giving it to productive people and see what happens.

      AC

    23. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do this. I had a friend who was in a "Men's Club" from caltech. It was founded by someone who realized the only requirement to form a club was enough names on a petition, and that there could be no official discrimination. (IIRC, he said there was even a woman in the "men's club"). To receive funding, the societies for {"black", women, "hispanic"} engineers have to accept anyone interested -- not based on race, sex, etc... Just the same as the societies for mechanical or electrical engineers had to accept anyone interested.

    24. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't do that, a Society for White Engineers is racist, while the Society for Black Engineers is progress.

      I personally believe the only racist I know of is jesse jackson.

    25. Re:RACIST! by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      AC complaining about someone posting as AC. I'd say it is time for -2 IDIOT moderation to put these people in their places.

    26. Re:RACIST! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The NBA values physical ability. Tech companies value mental ability. Are you saying that black people are inherently less intelligent than white people? It's a theory that has been researched and mostly rejected.

      I suppose you could argue for a programme to help stretch young white kids on some kind of medieval rack so that they are more competitive at basketball, in exchange for better schools and learning opportunities for young black kids.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re: RACIST! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's a problem and not a symptom?

    28. Re:RACIST! by Wootery · · Score: 1

      That's not something anyone in the technology sector can effect, though...

    29. Re:RACIST! by Raseri · · Score: 1

      (Not saying what that race was, as the problem was just a couple of assholes, and not a more general problem).

      Obviously, the preferred race was South Asian. Why bother being coy about it?

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    30. Re: RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excatly.....

    31. Re:RACIST! by stdarg · · Score: 1

      The NBA values physical ability.

      Are you saying that white people are inherently less physically able than black people? How do you measure physical ability? There are physical sports where white people are overrepresented (like hockey), so let's not pretend that top white athletes are not competitive. It's entirely possible that there is systemic racism in basketball. Are childhood training dollars spent disproportionately in black communities? For instance I remember Clinton's midnight basketball program.. how many white kids showed up to that?

      Are there systemic racially biased issues with player selection? For instance, some players are recruited straight from high school. Blacks are less likely to go to college than whites, so this disproportionately helps blacks.

      What about the rules of basketball? Is there a systemic problem that gives an advantage to one race or culture?

      I'm like 75% serious about this, even though it started as a joke. These are the exact same things you hear people say about institutional racism against blacks in any area where whites seem to have an overrepresentation.

      Tech companies value mental ability. Are you saying that black people are inherently less intelligent than white people? It's a theory that has been researched and mostly rejected.

      It has been rejected as a matter of principle by the scientific community, not as a matter of fact. Most of the research I've seen is looking into why whites do better on intelligence tests, have higher academic performance, and better career performance (judged by employment numbers and salaries), etc, as an attempt to explain why these tests are biased against blacks. Some of the difference can be explained by adjusting for socioeconomic status, exposure to lead, etc.. but I've never seen a comprehensive explanation that accounts for the entire difference. And, uncharacteristic of traditional science, that unexplained difference is not accepted as legitimate, it is labeled as simply "not known YET."

    32. Re:RACIST! by rhazz · · Score: 1

      In my experience (Canadian government IT) if there is racism preventing black people getting jobs, it is happening before the job application process.

      I am a programmer working in an IT section with about 75 employees, and we do not have a single black person currently employed. And this is government, where being any official minority gives you a leg up on everyone else in the pool. We had a black testing consultant a several years back, and last year we had a black student. But otherwise we have many whites, asians, indians, and misc, all of varying qualities. In university (in the same city) my classrooms were a similar mix, also with very few black people. Of the black people I've encountered that work in this organization, almost all of them are on the business policy side, which usually means they are PhD's (veterinarians).

    33. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! If you wrap yourself in a anti-racism flag you can do no wrong. Any and all actions are good because they are doing 'something' to fight racism. Pathetic.

      Here's a clue for you: Jesse Jackson is NOT attempting to fight racism. He's exacerbating it for his own profit.

    34. Re: RACIST! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      This. The article was confusing, at first I thought he was against h-1b visas and wanted more Americans working, then it switched to not enough black programmers. There is a huge number of minorities working in the tech industry but it's not the black minority. Is Jesse Jackson supporting Americans or blacks only?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    35. Re:RACIST! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that white people are inherently less physically able than black people? How do you measure physical ability? There are physical sports where white people are overrepresented (like hockey), so let's not pretend that top white athletes are not competitive. It's entirely possible that there is systemic racism in basketball. Are childhood training dollars spent disproportionately in black communities? For instance I remember Clinton's midnight basketball program.. how many white kids showed up to that?

      Statistically speaking there are more very tall black African Americans than white Americans. I'm not sure that statistically African Americans are dumber though, if you were to somehow measure raw intelligence and potential rather than academic results.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    36. Re:RACIST! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      There is a legitimate problem, though, that a disproportionate number of degree holding blacks aren't working in their field. The CEO of McDonald's is an EE. He's not doing bad for himself these days but you have to wonder why he couldn't establish a career as an engineer.

      Maybe he didn't want to?

      I started out as a microwave engineer in military electronics. After several years I couldn't stand it anymore, learned me that there programming stuff and changed careers to IT. The engineer working next to me quit a year or so before I did. I hear he's fixing CB radios somewhere away from the madding crowd. It does happen, and by choice.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    37. Re:RACIST! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      So, wait, the problem is that the wrong minorities are doing the jobs? This is complicated.

      There are plenty of open developer jobs in the US. Heck, we have several on my team we can't fill. I strongly suspect people complaining about this either just don't make the cut, or don't want to move to where the jobs are.

      It might depend on where you work. My manager stated publicly a couple years ago that he'll be concentrating on offshore contractors and H-1B applicants for all future hires for budgetary reasons. In those two years, partly do to regular churn, and partly due to people getting fed up and leaving, the racial characteristic of the department changed dramatically. So much so that the locals who are left are becoming concerned about their own future. Currently, people with visas and people remoting out of little towns east of Mumbai outnumber US citizens (of any race).

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    38. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa! Cool? Are you attempting to imply there are no qualified black men and women that have the academic and professional background to fill positions at IT firms? Surely you don't think that Jesse Jackson is proposing hiring blacks that are not qualified, do you? I have been in IT for 19 years and I have seen more uneducated and unqualified white people working in IT than I have ever seen that were black, because blacks don't even get a interview if they don't have credentials, whereas a white guy can vouch for a buddy and management will take a gamble and make an attempt to train the white guy. Black men and women are never afforded the benefit of the doubt like that, it just never happens. If you are white and commenting on this subject, you should consider white privilege when you make comments, there are things that you assume that simply are not true when you start talking about how blacks and whites are perceived.

    39. Re: RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. If he's trying to sail that ship into the waters of high tech/applied science he's in for a rough time. Engineers have among the lowest tolerances for his brand of BS and for the most part in my experience tech companies are functionally closer to strict meritocracies than most other areas of life. At the end of the day engineers who know their stuff will uplift their organizations, and vice versa and hiring managers at tech companies know this. Compilers don't care about the concentration of melanin in the developer's skin. Nor do circuits, bridges, or refineries. People running these companies are well aware of this.

    40. Re:RACIST! by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Statistically speaking there are more very tall black African Americans than white Americans.

      Height is only one factor to consider in a basketball player. If not, there isn't a shortage of tall white guys to put on the team. Problem is most tall people lack other characteristics that make a good basketball player.

      But let's say you're right. Whatever characteristics make a good basketball player, including height, are somehow more amply found in blacks. In another industry, a setup that catered to characteristics specific to one race would be called racist. These problems have easy solutions after all. For example, if white people aren't tall enough, then make basketball hoops shorter. There's no *reason* they're so tall, it's arbitrary and according to you tilts the field in favor of one race over others.

      I'm not sure that statistically African Americans are dumber though, if you were to somehow measure raw intelligence and potential rather than academic results.

      Forget raw intelligence, we don't need it in this discussion. Let's say a company or school screens applicants not on "raw intelligence" but on "how well you do on SATs" or "what your high school GPA is." Perfectly objective measures, just like height. It would be the same standard, applied equally to everyone. But people call it racist because the SATs are culturally biased against blacks. It's arbitrary, just like some of the tests the NBA has (like height). It has different outcomes based on race, just like the NBA.

      Are you okay with that, as long as we add the caveat that it's measuring the applicants performance on the SAT, not raw intelligence?

    41. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your statement is total BS. Blacks are discouraged in subtle ways. But that's okay cause at the end of the day Blacks will dominate the software industry in ways that the current shot callers cannot imagine. Its a case of that which does not kill me only makes me stronger. Road blocks and obstacles thrown in the way of Black Americans have fallen before. This situation is not new. Bring it

    42. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I think that every Society for Black Engineers needs a counterpart Society for White Engineers.

      Yeah, yeah, yeah. Cry me a river. Look, just because a professional society wants to get together for mutual encouragement and support doesn't mean that white America needs to knee-jerk react with "b-b-but, that's RACIST!!!" There definitely are places where the line must be drawn. This is not one of them.

    43. Re:RACIST! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Development is a global market, and the work can be done anywhere. Best get used to that fact, as it won't change. However, demand still exceeds supply and supply is fully online worldwide: every university worldwide with a credible CS program, and quite a few with dubious ones, are being recruited from now, and have been for years. The workforce was growing exponentially 10 years ago, as new nations were opening up, but is growing linearly now and demand is still strong. It's one of the best paying jobs in every country now. Nothing to complain about.
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    44. Re: RACIST! by Raseri · · Score: 1

      tech companies are functionally closer to strict meritocracies

      This would in no way explain the huge numbers of South Asians in their employ. The strange thing is, black or Latino Americans could be hired almost as cheaply as Indians, so the preference is to crapflood the market with imported labor in order to push down wages overall. Usually, he is indeed a shakedown artist, but in this case, Jackson is on the right track.

      --
      Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    45. Re:RACIST! by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      Ok, so who IS fighting racism? Because just looking at some of the posts in this thread, it needs fighting.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    46. Re:RACIST! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Development is a global market, and the work can be done anywhere. Best get used to that fact, as it won't change.

      I understand that, and I have no problems competing on merit. But I'm still here (at this time) seeing the quality of the people we are hiring, and there is a definite trend to go on price rather than capabilities. We are hiring programmers that have zero experience with the tools they have been hired to use. I'm having to baby them, not through our work environment, methods and procedures, but basic things like how to log into the tool and how to open a project.

      There seems to be a school of thought that ten offshore programmers at $5/hour are better than one local programmer at $50/hour. There are rare cases where this is true, but it generally isn't for long -- true expertise will move on as soon as a better offer becomes available. What often happens (what's happening right now) is that the $5/hour programmers not only aren't productive, they drag down the productivity of the remaining personnel who actually know what they're doing.

      But managers can show that development costs are down, so the trend continues.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    47. Re:RACIST! by dave.leigh7335 · · Score: 1

      So your theory is what? That blacks are too smart to see what whites have missed? Sorry, guy, but IT is filled to the brim with minorities, and jobs on-shore are everywhere. And yes, many are filled with H1-B visas, but it is clearly not a racism problem, nor is it an opportunity problem. Look at the number of black applicants for tech jobs. Look at the number of black students majoring in STEM. Who's missing? Failure to capitalize on opportunities is not equivalent to the nonexistence of those opportunities, and you can't bitch your way into them either. These are jobs that demand productive output... results. And it's too easy to know whether somebody writes code or designs tech that works, so nobody skates and stays employed. The solution is -- to put it bluntly -- to stop laughing at Urkel and play up how cool and desirable these jobs are. To capitalize on the opportunities takes real skill, and that takes real work. So your TARGET of a campaign can not be the industry. That's just planning to fail. The target must be young students, and they must be targeted LONG before they get to college.

    48. Re: RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As ludicrous as that sounds, it might just be accurate.

      Black culture is a hindrance to the success of many black people. If you can't see that you've been drinking a little too much PC coolaid. I wish it weren't true, but look at any comparative statistics.

      While you seem like a relatively logical person, I have to question your self righteous chest thumping indignation. Did it make you feel better about yourself?

    49. Re: RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol...

    50. Re: RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's far more insidious and hateful than that.

      It's called black culture... and it's the biggest hurdle black people have to overcome to be successful.

    51. Re: RACIST! by jimmyfrank · · Score: 1

      Grim? 120/hr right now, hope it stays grim is that's what it's called now.

    52. Re: RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the jobs go where the cheap labor is at. For Example China. For couple cents hour pay that management of that company will earn profits I call this modern day slavery. Capitalisim means get phucked!!!! Basically bye hardworking American Middle class

  7. Here we go again..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We need to stop teaching people that their skills and abilities matter and that the color of their skin is what is important right? That'll get rid of racism right? Effing liberals.

  8. Computers are Racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rakim, Oakland: "See, computers are racist because they make them too hard to use. They need to make them easy like TV, so people in the community can have good jobs. Computers are made by whites and Chinese, and they don't like it when we try to get ahead.

    http://joyreactor.com/post/566176

  9. Probably going to get flamed for this by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But I have a hard time referring to Rev. Jackson by the titular "US Civil Rights Leader" when in fact, he is most widely known for promoting the civil rights of a specific minority. Also, and again, I don't like where this is going. Hiring should be based on qualification of skill, and NOTHING else. Trying to make up for inequality of upbringing by arbitrating diversity standards is as stupid today as it was 20 years ago.

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Immerman · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. And if only 1% of your staff is black you've got to suspect that something else is already in play...

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by powerlord · · Score: 2

      I would hope its mostly disparity of education and experience.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    3. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if only 1% of your staff is black you've got to suspect that something else is already in play...

      How many blacks are intelligent enough to do do the job? How many blacks are competent enough to do the job? How many blacks are interested in doing the job? How many blacks that are intelligent, competent and interested didn't get better offer from someone else?

    4. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I have a hard time referring to Rev. Jackson by the titular "US Civil Rights Leader" when in fact, he is most widely known for promoting the civil rights of a specific minority. Also, and again, I don't like where this is going. Hiring should be based on qualification of skill, and NOTHING else. Trying to make up for inequality of upbringing by arbitrating diversity standards is as stupid today as it was 20 years ago.

      I'd like the NBA to release race statistics, how many Indian's (the Asian kind, not the Native American kind) are in the NBA? Or the NFL for that matter?

    5. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. An "opportunity shortage" would lead to this. That's exactly what he is talking about.

    6. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US Civil Rights Leader?

      More like known racist.

    7. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely. And if only 1% of your staff is black you've got to suspect that something else is already in play...

      Starting with "how many African Americans have an education in tech?".

      When I went to university, I do not remember a single black person in my courses. Since then, I've known only a handful in tech.

      I've known and worked with Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Indian, Sri Lankan, Nepalese, Czech, Russian, Australian, Egyptian, Pakistani, Turkish and pretty much every other nationality I can think of -- which makes for awesome company pot lucks.

      And, for reasons I cannot even begin to explain, the only blacks/African Americans I've met have been what I'd call "recently African" (ie. first generation immigrants).

      I have never known anybody who refused to hire a qualified black candidate. But, in my experience (which admittedly doesn't cover everything), there's simply not many applicants.

      So, the question to ask is: do blacks, as a group, even go into tech? Are they self excluding from the profession? Is the education system failing to get them into it?

      I don't think it's so much that people are excluding anybody, it's that you can only include people who come to the game.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if only 1% of your staff is black you've got to suspect that something else is already in play

      At least three possible explanations:
      1)There is discrimination in hiring against black.
      2)Blacks are in average less smart because of genitics.
      3)Black culture is detrimental to intelligence.
      or a combination of all 3.

      Now, to distinguish those cases you'd need studies but no one would dare to study if 2 or 3 is right as it would be career suicide. So we get the faulty logic: 2 cannot be right because nature is fair and loving. 3 cannot be right because all cultures are equals. Therefore 1 is the only reason. Of course, it would be equally as retarded to assume 1 cannot happen without any further studies. However, you can't make a conclusion just because you don't like the other possibilities. Precision: I don't like 2) or 3) either and I really hope they're incorrect hypothesis. But not liking something shouldn't cause us to shut down our brains and use faulty reasoning. The "fair nature" hypothesis is as bad of an assumption as the "fair world" hypothesis.

    9. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has mainly been my experience also. I have been in the industry since 1996 in one form or another. It is rare to run across a black american in the field. I knew of one in 1998 locally. There is one black american at my company, very knowledgeable tech he was one of the people who was in charge of hiring me.

      In college there is maybe 5% at best, a few of which failed out or changed majors (but so did several of all other races). The tech industry has a good job growth and everything go with that only second to the medical field from the little research I did. A lot of people start something in college just because the money is good and never finish or change majors. So by the time people are done in my school its pretty common to not even have a black student left..

    11. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, for reasons I cannot even begin to explain, the only blacks/African Americans I've met have been what I'd call "recently African" (ie. first generation immigrants).

      Immigrating to the US to become African? I cant explain that either.

    12. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by starslash · · Score: 1

      And, for reasons I cannot even begin to explain, the only blacks/African Americans I've met have been what I'd call "recently African" (ie. first generation immigrants).

      Immigrating to the US to become African? I cant explain that either..

    13. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Immigrating to the US to become African? I cant explain that either..

      Posting the same stupid comment as both your own account and AC, also inexplicable.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. And if only 1% of your staff is black you've got to suspect that something else is already in play...

      Starting with "how many African Americans have an education in tech?".

      When I went to university, I do not remember a single black person in my courses. Since then, I've known only a handful in tech.

      Agreed. I work in a metro area that is at least 50% black. We have received hundreds of resumes at our scientific/tech/research department over the last few years, followed by at least 100 interviews. I can only recall one black applicant, and he was hired. He was not hired because of his race to make up for some BS quota. He was later fired for incompetence and laziness, but no one attributed that to race as far as I know. He just sucked. Jackson or Sharpton would have probably called us racist for not keeping around dead weight.

  10. right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    barack obama has proven once and for all there are no white people holding blacks back from anything. jesse jackson is just a failed attempt at maintaining the racial divide in the US. it is not white responsibility to make sure these various colors of people get ahead in our country. all they have to do is exactly how us responsible do; get your shit together, dont let crack or a joint distract you from your long term goals. no more excuses. and stop emulating people like snoop dog and others that brag abt drugs.

    nothing is keeping you in 'the hood'. i am dirt poor and have lived in a middle-class neighborhood for over 30yrs. i rent a tiny one bedroom apt in a rental house, and im disabled. yes, i get less than 1k/mo, just like most of the blacks out there whining abt 'i only make min wage'. shut up, i have less income than you. just get your shit together n stay out of my hood.

    1. Re:right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barack Obama isn't from the "hood." He was raised by affluent whites. You think he would be in the White House today if he were raised in some shithole ghetto where you get more respect coming back from prison than from college and no one knows their father? Hell, he wouldn't even be able to put together a coherent sentence.

    2. Re:right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the funny thing is that he acts like he was a poor like boy whenever it's time to give a crowd rallying speach.

      I still remember the debates where he told Romney that he didn't know what was in his 401k plan because he had less money than Romney.

    3. Re:right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont let crack or a joint distract you from your long term goals

      You need to remove "joint" from that sentence. Haven't you heard? Marijuana is okay.

    4. Re:right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does his class have to do with racial discrimination? Unless you're acknowledging that class is the big divider in the country rather than race.

  11. And how about a real tax on wealth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Income from labor is heavily taxed while income from wealth is taxed to a much less extent.

    There are a lot of rich "progressives" in tech that call for higher taxes on the rich but it's always higher taxes on income from labor that get put into law.

    So how about a national property tax on assets, too, while we're fixing all the hypocrisy in IT land?

    1. Re:And how about a real tax on wealth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah yes, nothing like having the government decide the value of assets and what portion they deserve because you had the audacity to work for it and purchase the property. Gotta make the the government gets their "Fair share", and in that case, a 100% share of all assets.

    2. Re:And how about a real tax on wealth? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Pay your taxes hippy.

    3. Re:And how about a real tax on wealth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So how about a national property tax on assets, too, while we're fixing all the hypocrisy in IT land?

      What assets... I leased them from a subsidiary of another company in sweeden. Oh some other company owns that think they are in Ireland. Hell we lost money on this deal we get a nice tax break.

      Your way makes it easier to dodge taxes.

  12. There's no talent shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's greed.. there are a lot of Americans with the skills... corporate america is greedy so they outsource.

    soon outsourcing is going to bite them in the ass. who's going to buy corporate america's products ??? no americans and not anyone on an H1B visa.
    lmao. what goes around comes around.

    1. Re:There's no talent shortage by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like Microsoft laying off 18,000 and simultaneously arguing for more H1B visas?

    2. Re:There's no talent shortage by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      If they're laying off mostly non-programmers (i.e. "overhead"), but are still hiring for programming positions, then this would make sense. If not, then it's pretty inexcusable. In either case, someone should have known that at the very least, this would end up looking really bad for them.

      Regardless, the fact that the e-mail describing the layoffs actually used the word "synergies" three times told me all I needed to know about the new CEO. Someone in touch with today's culture would never have used that word unless he was mocking another company for using it. Even when using business buzzwords, Microsoft is still about five years behind the times.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  13. Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Informative

    He seems convinced that the tech companies with the fewest black developers make the most amazing products.

    It seems he's basically arguing that there's a correlation (and therefore maybe causality) between being diverse and not leading the market.

    1. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      I thought he was arguing against HB1 visas that import foreign workers instead of trying to hire more diverse American workers.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      I thought he was arguing against HB1 visas that import foreign workers instead of trying to hire more diverse American workers.

      That's my best guess too. What if those workers are black? Or black and from impoverished countries? I'm curious if a liberal Democrat can bring himself to say "Americans first."

    3. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by DamnOregonian · · Score: 2

      Americans first.

    4. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Democrat. Americans first. Also: the second amendment guarantees a personal right to bear arms. Also, also: bring back public executions.

      We're not all the pinko pansies you've been lead to believe.

    5. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if those workers are black? Or black and from impoverished countries?

      No. Africans are generally successful people in America, and don't think very much of Black Americans, in general. Since Africans are not profitable for Jesse Jackson, he isn't interested in "helping" them.

    6. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I'm a Democrat. Americans first. Also: the second amendment guarantees a personal right to bear arms. Also, also: bring back public executions.

      This guy should be head of the GOP

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 0

      Can a Republican after the House GOP voted against an America First bill????? Can we say douche bag.

    8. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      It seems he's basically arguing that there's a correlation (and therefore maybe causality) between being diverse and not leading the market.

      Makes sense. Companies intent on "diversifying their workforce" are probably too focused on politics or appearances rather than paying attention to their products and customers.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    9. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Chances are if someone is from an impoverished country and is trying to get a job in the American tech sector, they were either educated in America or another first world country at some point. India and China's tech education sectors are no joke, but part of the core of the HB1 visa problem is that they complete their education at home, head to the US to get some experience, then head back and take all that experience with them. Hiring American workers first would ensure all that industry experience stays here.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    10. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      I'm a Democrat. Americans first. Also: the second amendment guarantees a personal right to bear arms. Also, also: bring back public executions.

      We're not all the pinko pansies you've been lead to believe.

      GRRRR... All the most interesting posts are ACs on this topic. I would ask why the above AC is voting Democrat, given his/her professed leanings. Not that the GOP is much different lately (unfortunately... or at least at the leadership level).

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  14. Representation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's my understanding that many minorities are already over represented in the tech field when compared to how many get related degrees. If anything places like Google and Apple are disciminiating against white people with their hiring practices.

    Fix the degree issue and the rest will work itself out.

  15. The problem isn't color of one's skin... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it's the content of one's culture.

    If Jesse wants more people with his skin color in the tech industry, he needs to get more of them into the proper culture.

    A thug mentality, and victimhood culture, does not succeed. A culture focused on academics, hard work, and personal responsibility does.

    1. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its difficult to focus on education when schools send children home on Friday with food so they'll have something to eat for the weekend.

      These kids are focused on survival in the poor neighborhood, not attending Stanford then moving into a 5K/month apartment in San Jose.

    2. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      ...it's the content of one's culture.

      If Jesse wants more people with his skin color in the tech industry, he needs to get more of them into the proper culture.

      A thug mentality, and victimhood culture, does not succeed. A culture focused on academics, hard work, and personal responsibility does.

      Precisely right. I am proud of my niece's accomplishments. She took control of her life and decided to start making healthy life choices.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    3. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree in general but that is not an absolute. We've seen ample evidence over the years of institutions like the police giving particular attention to black communities in a negative way. Simple possesion of an illegal narcotic is more likely to destroy your future job prospects as a young black man than if you belonged to any other ethnic group. And I don't know if that is because people of other ethnic groups treat them unfairly in the court system or if it is a self inflicted thing. I am always surprised by the extremely negative atitudes my succesful black co-workers have for any young black person who makes a poor decision. It's probably some mix of both those problems though.

    4. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 0

      I know lots of honest, hard working blacks. I know they're a tiny minority in their own communities because they resisted the culture they were raised in. I know it was hard for them to speak proper english and succeed in school while their peers denigrated them for being "too white".

      And I know that many of them still feel tortured by the remnants of the victimhood culture they came from - they really are hurt by the implication that they're "too white", even if they keep up a brave face.

    5. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A victimhood culture DOES win, as evidenced by how conservatives embrace self-victimization in almost every facet of their lives. They are quite successful as well.

    6. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 0

      Yes, the thug, gangbanger, and victimhood culture rule applies to any skin color.

      Sadly, blacks are more affected by thug, gangbanger and victimhood culture, especially since they have these so-called "leaders" like Jackson banging the victimhood drum day-in and day-out. I've never heard of any south-east asian "leader" demanding racial quotas for tech companies because of prior oppression.

      Cultures focused on academics, hard work, and personal responsibility tend to be prominent with asian immigrants, but other notables would be your typical jewish culture, or Mormon culture, or even just plain old "geek" culture (thank you slashdot). Cultures focused on ethnic studies to revel in narratives of oppression, or those promoting ebonics, or other self-segregation from mainstream values, on the other hand, cluster around certain ethnicities simply because of their particular targeting.

      Bottom line - people of any skin color can succeed, but people with self-destructive cultures only make it harder to succeed.

  16. Jesse Jackson by asmkm22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hard to take him seriously when he's basically made himself very wealthy by "advocating" for blacks. It's hard to find anything he's done in the last 30 years that has had any meaningful impact, beyond lining his own pocket. But that hasn't stopped him from taking the soap box every chance he can get, before moving onto whatever new crisis comes up -- often leaving his previous efforts hanging.

    1. Re:Jesse Jackson by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hard to take him seriously

      A more accurate headline might be Jesse Jackson: Please, Pay Attention to Me!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. The "equal opportunity" employees by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Having an "equal opportunity" President is proving to be so popular, I can't wait for Mr. Jackson to be treated by an "equal opportunity" heart surgeon...

    fessed up to having a tech workforce that's only 1% Black, apparently par for the course in Silicon Valley.

    Not only is Silicon Valley young and Illiberal, they are also working on developing their businesses and would not sabotage their start-ups' success by turning away real talent.

    Whatever the problem is, Silicon Valley's "racism" ain't it...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  18. Good for him by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > Jackson spoke to press after meeting with Labor Secretary Tom Perez for a review of H-1B visas, arguing that data show Americans have the skills and should have first access to high-paying tech work.

    I usually find myself disagreeing with Jackson, but he seems to be on the right track here. I'm really hoping his involvement doesn't muddy the issue.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Good for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's clarifying the issue to the average American. they don't understand why their friends and family--of all stripes and colors--don't have jobs in tech despite their degrees, training and experience.

  19. dazzled by cutting edge gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh good grief. Compare companies profit lines by diversity breakdown. I'd love to see if they compete in the market place.

    I'm so tired of the hire - me - for - my - race crowd. Hire me because of my intelligence, creativity and work ethic. Geez.

    Those liberal companies don't necessarily follow what they preach. Apparently Jackson hasn't received his annual check so it's time to remind them.

    1. Re:dazzled by cutting edge gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So we are supposed to allow companies to hire white, heterosexual cis males just because of intelligence, creativity and work ethic? Check your privilege!

  20. Can't force diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Jackson maybe your focus should be on Black's getting a better education and actually going to college for technical degree's. Maybe then these companies could actually hire a more diverse group of employee's. I myself have had enough of how many breaks people get in the US and yet you have Mr. Jackson crying foul at every little degree of unjust as he see's it in racial hiring. I would remind Mr. Jackson of how little American's in general focus on getting degree's in science, engineering, or any kind of technology. If you want those stats to change you have to convince the minorities to stay in school and not just get by on a token degree. That's the only way employer's can have the proper mix of people as workers.

  21. Are only black people "diverse"? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a NYT article:

    Of Google’s technical staff, 60 percent are white, 1 percent are black, 2 percent are Hispanic, 34 percent are Asian and 3 percent are of two or more races.

    As I read it, America is about 63% non-Hispanic white. Which sounds pretty close to Google's proportion of white technical staff.

    It sounds like Jackson really needs to have a discussion as to why black people are being so out-hired by Asians.

    1. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by Reason58 · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter what percentage of the total population a race is if they aren't getting related degrees they won't be hired.

    2. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... but.. no, if he brings that up, then the whole "minority = victim" argument goes out the window.

    3. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Isn't it obvious? Since any disparity with proportions in the general population can only mean some sort of deliberate discrimination, we are forced to conclude that Silicon Valley is unfairly biased in favor of Asian people.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    4. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by digsbo · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter what percentage of the total population a race is if they aren't sufficiently skilled they won't be hired.

      FTFY because I don't think giving dumbed-down degrees, a likely possible proposed solution, would really help.

    5. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by fishybell · · Score: 1
      Comparing them to the US as a whole isn't particularly fair, as they're (in theory) mostly pulling local talent from California. California's demographics:
      • Racial composition - 2010
      • White - 57.6%
      • Asian - 13.1%
      • Black - 6.2%
      • Native - 1.0%
      • Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander - 0.3% 0.4%
      • Other race - 17.0%
      • Two or more races - 4.9%

      So really, Google is more white and Asian and less "other" and black than the rest of California.

      --
      ><));>
    6. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by Kojiro+Ganryu+Sasaki · · Score: 1

      Google is probably not an accurate representation of that employment market considering that it seems to me to be exactly the company that would make deliberate attempts to hire for diversity.

      Anyway. While the amount of whites seems fairly accurately representative of america as a whole, the proportions of non-whites is interesting.

      White (72%)
      African American (12%)
      Asian American (5%)

      Asians are grossly overrepresented and african americans are very underrepresented.

    7. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by gandhi123 · · Score: 1

      "they're (in theory) mostly pulling local talent from California. "

      What theory are you referring to?

      Google recruits at prestigious colleges all around the country. You think Google isn't interested in hiring MIT grads because they aren't in California?

  22. What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw him cry like a baby when Obama was elected..

    I kind of think he's for real.

    On the other hand, as someone who has worked with very gifted African-American developers (at least here in Metro-Atlanta)* and who was offered a lucrative position because of his talents (technical AND social - he was GREAT to work with!), I am not so sure that there is a problem on the employer's side based upon my sample of one with a standard deviation of nonsense.

    Oh! The '*' - we had a HUGE problem with our software. I was tasked with finding out WTF happened.

    It was me. I fucked up.

    Now, I was handed a GOLDEN opportunity to blame the black guy as Chris Rock would say.

    I told the lead, "It was my code. Let me fix I know what I did."

    Tech lead, "But it was something that [black guy's name] did to cause it, riiiight?"

    "Nope. It was me."

    "But there was something he did that made you think you needed to code it the way you did? Right?"

    A bit terse: "Nope"

    End of conversation.

    End of jobs from that contracting company too.

    Why did I do that? Because of my own sense of fairness, I really like the guy, and my own belief that talent and hard work should be rewarded and folks who make a mistake should have the opportunity to make it right and learn from it (that's me).

    I think I was done a favor. I love tech but I hate working in it.

  23. I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by rat9 · · Score: 2

    I mean what he wants is tech companies to hire minorities because of their race right? Wouldn't it be more fair to be colorblind in the workplace and hire people according to skill?

    1. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      I mean what he wants is tech companies to hire minorities because of their race right? Wouldn't it be more fair to be colorblind in the workplace and hire people according to skill?

      Most tech companies do. What they may not have is more black/african american people. Big tech companies are rolling with individuals from china, asia, japan, india, russia and africa. But the majority of new highly skilled workers are coming from china and india.

    2. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by blue9steel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be more fair to be colorblind in the workplace and hire people according to skill?

      There are two different schools of thought when it comes to solving racial inequity issues. Once school recommends that we strive towards colorblindness in decision making, the other school suggests that we deliberately take color into account but in a more positive way. The justification for the first school is that "two wrongs don't make a right". The justification for the second school is that "the situation won't resolve itself naturally". It's the whole equality of opportunity vs. equality of outcomes argument that tends to dominate our political discourse.

    3. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Skill is a social construct used by the white, heterosexual cis men to keep minorities down!

      What the hell does CIS mean?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    4. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by vbraga · · Score: 1

      Cisgender, the opposite of transgender.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    5. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by Gryle · · Score: 2

      It means you identify as the same gender you were born with. "I'm a man who was born a man and thinks I'm a man" or "I'm a woman who was born a woman and thinks I'm a woman" as opposed to "I'm a woman who was born a woman and thinks I'm a man" or vice-versa.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    6. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      There are two different schools of thought when it comes to solving racial inequity issues. Once school recommends that we strive towards colorblindness in decision making, the other school suggests that we deliberately take color into account but in a more positive way.

      and what is "a more positive way" to practice racism?

      I guess you can say that I fall into that first school of thought.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
    7. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      and what is "a more positive way" to practice racism?

      I guess you can say that I fall into that first school of thought.

      It's important to acknowledge that there is another way of looking at it. From that perspective what matters is the fairness of the outcomes. So for example a company that has a colorblind hiring process but a significant racial imbalance would not be considered acceptable. That sort of reasoning leads to "restorative justice" policies like affirmative action. The basic idea is that previous unfairness must be compensated for by providing preferential treatment for the class of wronged individuals until the situation has be been rebalanced.

    8. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Cisgender, the opposite of transgender.

      Sorry, but I don't see the need for a new term for that. How about normal or not gender confused?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    9. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      It means you identify as the same gender you were born with. "I'm a man who was born a man and thinks I'm a man" or "I'm a woman who was born a woman and thinks I'm a woman" as opposed to "I'm a woman who was born a woman and thinks I'm a man" or vice-versa.

      When I was growing up, there was no term for that other than "normal". When what you describe is the norm, there is no need for a new term because it is assumed that you are that unless if you specify otherwise.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    10. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Because "normal" implies transgendered individuals are somehow mutant or different (which they are) and therefore such a term is somehow prejudiced. (For the record, I agree with your assessment on the subject, I'm just explaining the reasoning behind the creation of such a term).

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    11. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      The basic idea is that previous unfairness must be compensated for by providing preferential treatment for the class of wronged individuals until the situation has be been rebalanced.

      But when is the situation ever rebalanced? or more correctly, who gets to say that it is rebalanced? (particularly given that there are significant parties who have a vested interest in the rebalancing never being considered complete.) Doesn't the preferential treatment for the wronged individuals tend to perpetuate the problem, even if it is at some lower level than the initial problem?

      It is somewhat like having a cast on a broken limb. The cast strengthens (by restraining) the limb so that it can heal, but if you never take the cast off, you still don't have use of the limb, and eventually you lose use of it due to atrophy.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
    12. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      My personal politics shade towards colorblindness, but in order to have an intelligent discourse about the problem I've made an effort to understand the other main point of view. Understanding the other sides argument doesn't mean I agree.

    13. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      There are two different schools of thought when it comes to solving racial inequity issues. Once school recommends that we strive towards colorblindness in decision making, the other school suggests that we deliberately take color into account but in a more positive way.

      When things are deeply out of whack, "positive" ("reverse" discrimination) force is needed. After the initial breakthrough occurs, it is better to use no force and allow things to occur more naturally (colorblindness) so the goal is not missed. The initial breakthrough has already happened. We should be striving for colorblindness.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  24. Location, location, location by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    I'd bet a dollar that the offices of tech companies outside of Silicon valley are a bit more diverse. What are the stats on offices in Atlanta, NYC, or Chicago? Not everyone is willing to move to the valley in pursuit of a six figure paycheck and 100 hour work week.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Location, location, location by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Google has lots of offices in places outside the Valley (famously buying a building or two in New York for instance), as do a number of other companies mentioned above.

      Is the article just targeting the Silicon Valley office population, or referring to the company workforce as a whole and already taking those other offices into account?

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Location, location, location by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's my question as well.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  25. Tech Diversity by nitsew · · Score: 2

    I have a dream that my four little computers will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their case, but by the content of their harddrives.

    1. Re:Tech Diversity by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      But is is a hard drive, a hybrid drive, an SSD, a floppy....

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    2. Re:Tech Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I have a dream that my four little computers will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their case, but by the content of their harddrives.

      Beige supremacy, baby!

    3. Re:Tech Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a dream that my four little computers will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their case, but by the content of their harddrives.

      My harddrives are filled with porn.

  26. lack of diversity? by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Does the article really mean to say "lack of diversity"? My company's IT department is a little over 80% east Indian, which although technically (probably) meets the definition of "lack of diversity", misses the usual colloquial definition of "too many white guys".

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:lack of diversity? by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      My company's IT department is a little over 80% east Indian...

      So what does your company have against the west side of India?

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  27. Re:Mod parent DOWN by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not racism to point out the fact that most H1B scab labor in IT is Indian. It's also not racist to point out that "lowering the bar" is bogus.

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general. He can fight against the pervasive drug and gang culture that keeps black kids away from any means to better themselves.

    Perhaps he could even get a bunch of athletes and rappers to just read to kids.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  28. Ageism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sadly, Silicon Valley's rampant ageism goes on unchallenged. Not everyone is affected by race, but eventually everyone is affected by age.

    1. Re:Ageism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally have not seen this, but I know it happens. (Pushing 60 in my case ...)

  29. Trying to stay relevant and rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesse needs a strawman to stay relevant and keep the cash flowing in. Nothing more to see here.

  30. automatic turn-off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Jesse Jackson is a master at crying out racism. This skill resulted in his family getting the beer distribution rights for Bud at Wrigley field and other venues. I would see his cries about silicon valley for what they are, a shakedown.

    Programming/software development is a field that does not tolerate sub-par performers, while for the most part recoginizes exceptional performers.

    1. Re:automatic turn-off by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Yar, I think he also misunderstands the work involved as well.

      If he were to look at an area with a high percentage of blacks, who were under-represented in low-skill, decent wage jobs (think detroit/rust belt 40 years ago) then he might have a point. IE, there's a large number of people *capable of doing the job* who aren't being hired. And that's fishy.

      IT though, is not anything at all like applying rivets on an assembly line. (despite what PHB's think.) It's a line of work that you actually have to be interested in to succeed. The certifications or degree programs don't guarantee a capable person. And that's what he's missing. Either it's a good-ole boy network that seems to favor indians and asians (and sometimes whites), and specifically excludes the mass of blacks who are good at/interested in coding. OR perhaps it's that there just aren't many qualified people who happen to black.

      Which basically boils down to the fact that If blacks in silicon valley have such an institutionalized sense of inability, that they aren't even trying to learn the skills needed -- then it's hopeless for them anyways. (And there simply is no excuse, the information is out there, for free, or very low cost. There isn't a guild or certifying body to exclude them.. it's as much as a meritocracy as anything in the US.)

      Playing the race card just serves to damage one of the most competitive and functional job markets in the country.

    2. Re:automatic turn-off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesse Jackson is a master at crying out racism.

      I wonder if anyone has ever tried to play dumb against him.

      JJ: You're racist!
      Me: I'm what?
      JJ: Racist! You hate black people!
      Me: I don't understand the accusation. I understand all the words separately, but I cannot parse the sentence in any meaningful way.
      JJ: You hate people based on their skin color!
      Me: Their what now? Again, I know what the words "skin" and "color" mean separately, but I have no idea what you are trying to imply when you put them together like that.

  31. Re: Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bugger off race baiter.

  32. Sometimes I wonder just WTH is up with SV by Rinikusu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe there is something to the SV culture that's either rotten or just too self-absorbed to acknowledge there may be a problem. I'm down in SoCal (LA) and having worked for several small tech shops, I've never seen the issues that a lot of folks complain about up in SV. My workgroup is 50% female, and other than my manager, everyone is a minority (black, asian, indian-asian (and not H1Bs). Upper management tends to be of the white-male variety (I dunno, do we count gingers in that?) although our CEO is white female. I've been on the interview panels and it's not like we were hiring for diversity. We were just looking for people who had the technical know-how and personalities that would not be detrimental to our work group. And, I must add, our women engineers are engineers, not just "tech evangelists" or "tech spokeswomen" and the like that seem to get a lot of controversial press up there. Our black developers? The same. Maybe there really is a tech-bro-fraternity mentality in the SV, I've not moved up there to find out for myself (and as an asian, I don't imagine I'd actually see much of it directed against me, but who knows? More likely, I'd face issues because I'm over the age of 40).

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  33. Racial guilt was so 20th century... by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    I'm beyond it. Our parents aren't. But I think my generation is beyond it. Once they phase out of leadership roles, I think parasites like Jessie will find they have guilt upon which to feed.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  34. Re:Mod parent DOWN by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's going to read to the athletes and rappers?

  35. At an interview by tyggna · · Score: 1

    I was once told that I'd be working primarily with white males, because only one out of every 200 candidates that apply to work there fit that demographic.

  36. Out of sync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever I hear about stuff like this I sometimes think that they'll succeed in getting more minorities into tech--just in time for the economic focus to shift someplace else.

    People who have education and wealth will always be on the leading edge of the curve. Whatever the next economic focus is, they'll find it. Jackson would better serve his community by giving them the tools they need to be aware of opportunity. He can't give them wealth in any meaningful way, so he should just focus on fixing education.

    Yes, overt racism needs to be addressed. If tech companies were deliberately refusing to hire people just because they don't fit a category, that needs to be addressed. This isn't the real problem though. I've worked alongside a few Blacks and Hispanics in techs. They were just as qualified as the Whites; just fewer in number. There was no racism problem, just the *legacy* of prior racism that lead to the lower numbers.

    You can't fix these problems overnight, and you'll make it worse if you try.

  37. No It's Not An Opportunity Shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I went to university there was no shortage of blacks there in general, just a shortage of them studying for STEM degrees.

  38. Re:Mod parent DOWN by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Informative

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general.

    Jackson isn't interested in waging race war, he wants to shakedown businesses for money for his organization and those of his cronies. Making it about race is just his form of extortion. Notice that whenever he goes after some company, it's suddenly made all better when it makes a donation to his cause and/or hires one or more people of Jackson's designation. I really admire the way the CEO of Cypress Semiconductor refused to knuckle under to Jackson back in 2001 after Jackson labeled Cypress a "white supremacist hate group.’” I hope every Silicon Valley target of his does the same.

  39. I rarely agree with Jesse Jackson by fritz1968 · · Score: 1

    We are on the opposite ends of the ideological rainbow (no pun intended), but I agree with part of what he is doing. The USA has plenty of high tech workers to fill any voids in the IT world here in the USA. If the number of H-1B visas should change, it would be to lower it, in my opinion. Definitely, do not increase this number.

    --
    It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
  40. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

    This seems to only happen in a government setting. Am I right?

    I work in the in Metro Atlanta and I had a few (quite talented I might add) African-American developers. One saved my ass with an encryption routine.

    Geoffry was this Nubian -as he referred to himself - very sharp coder/developer/computer scientist/ or what ever title you want to give him.

    Back in Boca Raton, my boss was this African-American who was a cross between Link on Mod Squad and Mr. Rogers. Brilliant developer who had the management-leadership skills that would melt the brains of the best.

    If I were a rich man....yabba dabba doo ... I'd give him a billion dollars and make him rich too - and me richer.

    1. Re:Nope by ruir · · Score: 1

      My experience with quotas is much contrary to yours... Generally the black guys hired to fill the quotas where very poor technically, and the ones who could advance for their own merit where the very (few) exceptions. If I had to (re)hire the hundred of guys that worked for me, I would only probably hire again one IT guy, and one foreman, they were really something that stands out from the crowd. Apart from that... I have very terrible anecdotes, like employees sabotaging printers with clips to pocket the customers payments, or worse, while doing some contracting work, a freshly (white) IT manager that only worked there a couple of days saying fuck you to a team of 10 network administrators after I called him because nobody could tell me where the central router was, and storming out of the room.

  41. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PseudoCoder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps he could even get a bunch of athletes and rappers to just read to kids.

    That's assuming these athletes and rappers can even read. http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/07/...

    --
    "Now, I doubt any of you would prefer a rolled up newspaper as a weapon against a dictator or a criminal intruder."
  42. As an African American, this pisses me off by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get it...I worked hard and was determined, and built my career from the ground up, WITHOUT a college degree. I don't understand why or even how I've continuously found work in an industry that needs a civil rights movement...? Should I ask the myriad of previous and current minority co-workers their experiences and trials/tribulations in attempting to break into this industry with such a color barrier? This is a fucking slap in the face of the ACTUAL civil rights movement of the past, and it sickens me.

    1. Re:As an African American, this pisses me off by BlackHeron717 · · Score: 1

      Individual achievements have never been able to overshadow the need for civil rights. There were black slave owners, does that mean that racism was over in the 1800's? Barack Obama is president, does that stop the penal system from disproportionately targeting minorities? I applaud you on your success, As a West Indian (I am Caribbean which is a fancy way of saying black in America) in Silicone Valley I have fought uphill with success, but that does not remove the institutional racism present throughout the industry. Still I commend you on your achievements they are only bolstered by the fact you did so in this environment.

  43. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesse, Jr. will need a job when he gets out of prison. Jesse, Sr is often referred to as the "King of Beer" around Chicago. He got another son a protected Budweiser distributorship when he did this to Anhueser-Busch a couple decades ago.

  44. Great! by Cardinal+Biggles · · Score: 2

    Yes! I was rejected for a job at Google once. Now I will be able to tell everyone it was only because I'm white. ;-)

    Seriously though, while I agree that hiring should be based on qualifications and not race/gender (or being a USian for that matter you bunch of nationalists), if an industry has so few non-white guys we need to take a long hard look at ourselves to check that there's no unfairness going on.

    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! I was rejected for a job at Google once. Now I will be able to tell everyone it was only because I'm white

      it wasn't quite because you are white, but because you are white AND did not possess an h1-b visa.

    2. Re:Great! by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      being a USian
      American, you jackass, United States of America, shortens to American. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shortens to British, not UKian.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  45. Re:FTFY by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

    While I think that Jackson is an opportunistic jackass, resorting to racial epithets is completely unnecessary and only serves to undercut your message. Be better than this. You owe it to your society and yourself.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  46. Professional Sports Need Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that almost all professional atheletes are Black is Racist!

  47. Some emphasis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a retired executive of a small east coast engineering services firm (and familiar with numerous other execs over a twenty some year career who all felt similar), all it takes is the right skills at the right price to get the job. I'd hired you if you were black, white, brown, or purple if you had the skills we needed at a price we could afford. Our biggest customer was the federal government, and when asked by a minority manager at that goverment agency why we didn't employ more of HIS minority members I noted that the firm was already about 25% total monority hiring. I then asked how I should choose between two equally qualified job candidates; one a member of the manager's minority group, and the other not a minority. The manager stammered and stuttered and was unable to provide any answer. When I suggested I would chose the candidate who would cost the business the least (salary and benifits) you would never have believed the dumbfounded look on the manager's face when hit with the realization that there might be more to hiring than race.

  48. And how about a real tax on wealth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When was the last time higher taxes on income from labor got put into law?

  49. Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm in Cambridge MA, and in 15 years I have interviewed exactly two African American (out of hundreds of interviews) tech workers and both were not close to qualified for the jobs they were interviewing for.
    There's a shortage of candidates!

  50. Re:Mod parent DOWN-they have CS degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He doesn't need to.
              Black Computer Science graduates essentially reached parity in 2006, capturing 12.4% of CS degrees. no longer can they be dismissed as an “under-represented minority”.

           

  51. Don't shoot the messenger by losttoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am an Indian (asian) and work in SF and have worked in a few big tech companies down in the valley. I understand that people like Jesse Jackson spew a lot of rhetoric for their own cause not necessarily for upliftment of the people he supposedly represents. And, I also understand, the solution isn't as easy as making tech companies have some sort of affirmative action - if there aren't enough black people with basic tech skills or college degrees then affirmative action isn't going to help. All that said, it is bizarre - in all the places I have worked including the current, there isn't a single black person on the entire floor. And, think, places like Oakland are just right across the Bay here but so few black people on the tech workforce. It speaks volumes about the failed social integration of black people in this nation - and it has failed at so many levels - from basic primary education, healthcare, law enforcement to higher education and outright discrimination. It doesn't matter who's to blame for it, really because at end of the day, you have a population that isn't as functional as the rest and we should be fixing that. Instead, we have these arguments where people don't even seem to recognize the problem.

    1. Re:Don't shoot the messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the problem that America has failed to educate them or whatever else?

      I would propose that it is a vicious cycle and it takes a rare person to break out in many areas. Yes, many of today's african american youth are failing to enter the workforce productively - or even complete a basic education. If you take individual instances of someone growing up in an unprosperous area where a number of like people have lived together, where the economic resources that are funding the schools are low by comparison, put them in a school district where the pay for teachers is low by comparison (driving talented staff elsewhere), with parents who may or may not support the individual child's success, and live in a culture where the 'cool' thing is often a divergent focus from education and a focus on sports or street life, are any one of these problems addressed at an "America" level or an "employer" level?

      That doesn't make them NOT problems. That just makes them problems that have to be addressed where the problem is.

      The problem is in dad's that are several times more likely to not be part of the family for African Americans than any other racial group.
      The problem is in homes where the kids aren't getting parental focus for school and education.
      The problem is in schools that are getting far less funding per head than regional averages because the local area real estate isn't worth the same as other districts.
      The problem is a focus where no one is "left behind" (which just means no one is allowed to proceed) instead of individual students being accountable for their OWN achievement.
      The problem is in a lack of setting positive role models in areas that make a realistic economic target for kids (hint, only a few hundred make it to the MLB/NBA/NFL COMBINED each year, and more than half of those get cut before they ever touch a regular season game ball).

      The Labor Secretary, and even the Chairman of Facebook or Google are not going to be able to make these problems go away. These problems start with the home, the value system, and the community. And to have any chance of solving them: they must be addressed there.
      The problem is in

    2. Re:Don't shoot the messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is precisely the issue. I'm a programmer in my 40s, in the SF Bay Area. I've sat through interviews of aspiring programmers for more than 20 years now. In all the interviews I've sat through, exactly one of the applicants was black, out of more than 1,000 people that I've interviewed. It appears that black people overwhelmingly do not choose careers in programming.

      It's not that black people aren't being hired. The problem is that black people aren't showing up.

      The ratios are better for other positions within tech companies. There have always been a few black people in HR, management, and so on. There were even a few black people in QA and IT (although very few). However, there were virtually no black people in engineering, because virtually no black people were pursuing careers in it.

    3. Re:Don't shoot the messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you've already stated it more eloquently than any of these "movements". As soon as these movements boil down into "racists!", "feminists!" - the discussion is long over. I've tried discussing the "why" of these movements with fundamentalist belief holders and they don't care. They just want to yell and be heard.

      As you've pointed out, there are areas for VAST improvement socially - but demonizing the last part of the chain is not the way to go about a proper dialogue.

  52. How else would he remain relevant though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's spent an entire career preying on racism for profit. How else is he to remain relevant?

  53. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what you are saying is that we need a program where kids go in to read to athletes and rappers?

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  54. Jesse Jackson DOES NOT WANT RACIAL EQUALITY! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

    Re: this comments subject:

    - If we had racial equality, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton would have to get real jobs, rather than become millionaire talking heads who make their bank off the blood of America's black community.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  55. Professional Victim by Jerrry · · Score: 1

    Jesse Jackson is a Professional Victim. 'Nuff said.

  56. Re:He's not wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Progressives are all for... being fucking retards.

  57. He's a crook by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jesse Jackson is a crook and runs a business, not a charity... it's called the Rainbow/PUSH coalition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
    They show up, accuse your business/industry of racism, do not letup until... you donate money to their cause, then they drop the issue.
    It's a scam.

    Just take a look at NASCAR.
    About 15yrs ago, NASCAR tried to break out of the south and become a mainstream sport. They were largely successful. Jesse Jackson saw this as an opportunity, went on morning talk shows and accused the industry of racism for their lack of black participants. Now, I'm not even going to argue that point... there are very few African Americans in NASCAR. It may very well have a problem with race... that's not the problem.

    What's the problem then? NASCAR then donated around $250,000 to Jesse Jacksons Rainbow Coalition and suddenly they were right with black America, Jessie Jackson dropped the issue and said NASCAR didn't have a race problem. NASCAR didn't add a single black employee or change any of their policies. The problem isn't that there isn't a racial divide in NASCAR or even Silicon Valley. The problem is Jessie Jackson doesn't care. He just wants to use that disparity to extort money from those businesses. He's a scam artist and a crook, and it's sad he's seen with such reverence in this country. He's done nothing but harm the black community and he should be ashamed of himself.

    1. Re:He's a crook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when I was getting my CS degree, we had a foreign exchange student from Africa (Nigeria, IIRC). The subject of Jesse Jackson came up. Man, oh man, did this student have a few things to say about JJ. It was basically the same story you described with NASCAR, except it involved a military dictator. JJ flies in, makes some noise about how terrible this dictator is, money changes hands, suddenly everything is alright.

  58. Re:Experience outside the valley--I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    yes, this is the case. Glad you spoke up.
    The AFL-CIO reports that more

    African Americans earn more computer-related degrees than Asians or Hispanics.[8]

            In 2010, 4,565 Bachelor’s degrees were awarded to African Americans in computer and information science. African Americans earned 1,193 more Bachelor’s degrees than Asians and 1,623 more than Hispanics.
            Also in 2010, African American students earned 1,324 Master’s degrees in computer and information sciences.

    see more here: http://www.brightfuturejobs.com/they_want_you_to_blame_us

    Donna Conroy, Director

  59. Barriers to entry by jgotts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The major cause of the lack of minority and women computer programmers was a financial barrier to entry.

    Today, you can get a desktop computer for $250. You can get a tablet for $300. You can get a laptop for $400. You can get an Android smartphone for $600, all pretty much medium to high end hardware, nothing second hand or used. 15 years ago, you had to invest a minimum of $1000 to get a new computer, and $1500 would give you something more reasonable. Importantly, decent home broadband connections are now affordable for all but the poorest individuals.

    The difference between someone becoming a computer programmer and making millions of dollars throughout his or her career and someone not in the field might now only be a few hundred dollar initial investment whereas when I was a kid it was thousands of dollars. Fortunately, we don't have to worry about that large investment anymore, so this aspect of the problem has solved itself.

    There are plenty of scholarship opportunities for minority and women computer programmers, but they need to get started way before college. Nobody learns programming at the university. If you're doing programming for the first time at the university, then very likely you'll never want to do it again. The programming work you do at school is dull, formulaic, theoretical, useless, and often frustrating.

    1. Re:Barriers to entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some - right wrong or indifferent - coming up with $200 in disposable income might as well be $20,000: it's just as out of reach.

  60. Chinese, Indians, and Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pervade the industry.

    Is this not diverse enough for him?

  61. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's handled in the Junior College Introductory Electronics courses. It's too bad more people don't make the 2 year pitstop before burdening themselves with debt at a nice 4+ year college....

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we had it in our 8th grade science class. (And then of course high school physics and then EE in college).

    2. Re:Actually... by bjwest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyone interested in an electronics degree, just like those interested in CS of any type (IT, programming, networking, whatever), should already know the basics. The sciences are not something you just decide to do on enrollment day and expect to be good at. There are certain skills and aptitudes that need to be in place, a way of thinking out problems that cannot be easily learned, and not having an interested in them until you're deciding on your future carer on college enrollment day, is setting yourself up for failure.

      If you're in it for the money, you're going to suck as a professional in any science, and you're work will be sub par.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    3. Re:Actually... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      i learned ohms law in high school, just what it was and its basics, not application or anything but that should be easy stuff for a 3rd year

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying Jar Jar Binks would not excel at the sciences?

    5. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you're work will be sub par.

      Just damn. I'm a nerd and I'd outsource you're job in a heartbeat.
      If you can't expect a basic level of fluency in English from you're domestic hires, what the fuck are you'all paying up for?

    6. Re:Actually... by bjwest · · Score: 1

      [leaning over the bridge to talk to you...]

      I'm commenting on an internet forum, not writing a dissertation. I quickly read over my post to see if it makes sense and look for red squiggly underlines, then hit submit, or preview, here on /., and may or may not quickly read over it again before final submission. If you such a nerd, then you know damn well what I was saying. If this kind of mistake bothers you so much, add me to your ignore list and don't read my posts. You'll find many mistakes like this in my online posts, here and on other forums, and there will be more in the future. If I were getting paid to write, or writing something official, I'd take more care. I'm not, so read it or fuck off, makes no big fuck to me either way.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
  62. If you outsource, you are KKK :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it has come to this, where we have to cry "racisim" to give jobs to Americans first?

    If playing that card gets some results, then fine. Something has to be done.

    Any American company that outsources to India is already an unpatriotic terrorist traitor that takes food out of the mouths of American children. And they are racist too. Frikin golden-brown supremacists.

  63. Now I know it's bullshit by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Anytime Jesse Jackson gets involved, you know it's more about skin color than relevant metrics.

    In some cultures, we might call that "racist".

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  64. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general

    I would keep an eye on that space. Since January, I've visited two very impressive inner-city STEM programs. One's run by the University of Michigan and is in Detroit, of all places, and the other is right here in Chicago, at Lindblom High, run by a friend of mine.

    The real interesting part will come in a few years, when these incredibly smart and capable kids start showing up in tech jobs. Then we'll see how many cries of, "affirmative action" we start to hear when a young black kid who grew up in a rough neighborhood gets promoted. We'll learn a little more about whether racism is a thing of the past or not.

    Seriously. At the Detroit place (it can't really be called a "school" because it's more of a maker space with a bunch of very sharp faculty), there was a kid who was coming out of the program and he had some very impressive schools recruiting him (but they wanted him to get his G.E.D. first, for some reason). He ended up getting his G.E.D., but then took a job with a well-known tech firm, because why would he go all NCAA, when the pros were calling, you know?

    It's going to be an interesting time.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  65. Jesse Jackson is racist by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Why is Jesse Jackson only protesting about the rights of African and Latino Americans instead of the rights of ALL Americans?
    Isn't that the very defintion of being blatantly racist?

    1. Re:Jesse Jackson is racist by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      He did, I guess you can't read: "Jackson spoke to press after meeting with Labor Secretary Tom Perez for a review of H-1B visas, arguing that data show Americans have the skills and should have first access to high-paying tech work. "

  66. Talent Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he needs to start working on finding ways to increase the talent pool of black candidates. How many black graduates are there each year with CS/EE/CE degrees? There's the problem.

    15 years ago when I was doing my EE undergrad (at small university) there was 2-3 black students in a class of ~80. In grad school (big public university) there weren't any (at least no native American, not counting African immigrants). This needs to be addressed first.

  67. Re:Jackson is Supporting the Right to Compete by jcr · · Score: 1

    As 3 tech advocacy groups show, Manpower, IBM, and Infosys are blocking qualified candidates.

    "claim", not "show", Donna.

    You're full of shit.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  68. Re:Jackson is Supporting the Right to Compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Companies with job openings on U.S. soil must allow all qualified candidates to compete

    Oh, sure, they do as long as all competing candidates have skill sets that exactly match what the Indian they want to hire has. Including that 10+ years in something that has been around 5 minutes.

  69. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS. how can there be more of Jesse's target demographic in tech jobs if there arent necessary numbers of them in the STEM courses??? He's short-sighted and (as many others have poined out) hungry for attention.

  70. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    he wants to shakedown businesses for money for his organization and those of his cronies.

    Unlike the Chamber of Commerce or the "Club for Growth"? Or "Americans for Prosperity" or...what's the name of Karl Rove's PAC that had like a 8% success rate..."American Crossroads"?

    Cracker, please.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  71. Re:Mod parent DOWN by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Right....because it's not like the STEM jobs aren't going to H1B visa holders...oh wait they are....moron.

  72. Sigh... by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

    So rather than asking why there aren't more blacks in tech, and addressing those issues (which mostly center on the welfare state and drug war destroying black culture), Jesse is going to pretend to still be relevant by trying to get racial hiring quotas in the tech industry. Oh joy...
    Racism against minorities is about as common in the US as polio (both exist only due to small pockets of people who ignore reason and logic). Jesse needs to keep fanning the flames on anything he can. Otherwise he'd have to get a productive job...like the white, Indian, and Chinese techies he wants to get fired.
    How come Jesse isn't concerned with the lack of diversity in professional basketball?

    1. Re:Sigh... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Leave it to a racist to claim there's no racism.

  73. There seems to be very few AA developers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my past 15+ years in the tech field, working in the bay area as well as elsewhere (all California however), I've met perhaps a handful of African American developers. I've worked with one. I also worked with one sys-admin guy who was African American. And a technical recruiter. That's about it. I don't remember any being in any of my classes in college either, at least not the computer science ones.

  74. Does anybody really believe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's not too busy getting his post-life dick wet, just like Clinton?

  75. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you sound like a self-hating liberal race-traitor. Go ahead and sell out your own race, and see what it gets you. See if your ghetto trash friends throw you a party when you go down to the hood to apologize.

  76. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what you are saying is that we need a program where kids go in to read to athletes and rappers?

    But the only pool of kids that can do that are the very ones these athletes and rappers BEAT UP in school for acting white by learning to read in the first place!

  77. Re:Mod parent DOWN by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    That others engage in cronyism doesn't make Jesse Jackson's actions not cronyism.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  78. K-12 Education by eepok · · Score: 1

    This and many similar disparities are only solvable with enhanced K-12 education in low-income, low-performing areas. Yes, that means spending more federal/state dollars per capita than in median income areas. More teachers (that stay for more than 3 years), smaller classrooms (that also have heating, cooling, and supplies), and more reliable funding. It does not suffice to provide equal state funding-- we got shit to fix.

    Not enough minorities at Microsoft? What's the proportion of minorities in the tech field?
    Not enough minorities in the tech field? What's the proportion of minorities taking STEM majors?
    Not enough minorities in STEM majors? How prevalent and to what quality was their STEM education in K-12?

    It always comes back to the K-12 education. Crime, poverty, treatment of women, minority imbalance in industry-- How good was the education?

    Want to fix the future? Focus on the education of the poor.

    1. Re:K-12 Education by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      this subject was discussed before, and there was this comment (I saved it as example of poor K-12 education, and those kids that get stuck with it):
      "Black people tend to be poor. Poor people tend not to have good schools in their neighborhoods. Having a bad education makes you less qualified to do certain jobs. Rather than trying to get people to hire more black people, we should be trying to fix the massive gap in the quality of schools in rich and poor neighborhoods."

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    2. Re:K-12 Education by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Can you point to a jurisdiction that has solved any of those problems through increased education spending?

    3. Re:K-12 Education by eepok · · Score: 1

      No, because it's not just increased education spending that creates better educated students. Buying iPads for everyone in the school will accomplish nothing. Spending money on a giant football field is worthless.

      That money has to be spent on:

      (1) Small class sizes
      --- Case Studies: http://www.classsizematters.or...
      -- Decreasing class sizes while keeping the same student population requires more classrooms and more teachers.

      (2) Climate Control
      --- Research: http://healthyschools.cefpi.or...
      -- Ensuring sufficient climate control in classrooms requires permission to expend resources on the use of A/C and heaters and, in many cases, the actual installation of HVAC systems.

      (3) Sufficient school supplies
      --- Research: Not handy, but it's fairly common sense that if your school can't afford to make copies of worksheets, those worksheets cannot be completed. Then, of course, there's paper, pencils, etc.

      (4) Passionate teachers and their retention
      -- This does not necessarily mean "pay teachers more". It means choosing teachers better and ignoring those who are in Teach for America for 3 years so they can pad their law school applications.
      -- Good, committed teachers are worth tenure, pension, and reserve fund to pay for substitutes. If you don't give them the financial security required to work hard in bad neighborhoods, they will take their resumes and go to other districts.

      (5) After school programs for parents of students
      -- 99.99% of the valuable education these students will receive comes from the school, but if the parent's do buy into it, that student will have to *fight* all the ailments of home just to graduate high school. Involve the parents by bringing them to school or visiting home and you'll see the investment stick.

    4. Re:K-12 Education by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      OK, so even though education spending is at an all-time per-student high, you can't find a single jurisdiction that has solved any of the problems you advocate spending more money on education for?

      Can you point to a jurisdiction that has spent money in the ways you're now advocating and has solved the economic problems you listed previously?

    5. Re:K-12 Education by eepok · · Score: 1

      You may have missed the first line I wrote, so I'll post it again: "... it's not just increased education spending that creates better educated students."

      The raw number of dollars spent within the general concept of education is irrelevant because it includes really stupid expenses like competitive athletics expenses, hair-brained over-investment in classroom tech, and luxury buildings for brand new schools who are seeking to attract the best and brightest teachers (to the detriment of other schools).

      Moreover, I provided links to research and case studies that show the benefits of my suggestions. One doesn't need to prove that a combination of treatments work before trying a combination of treatments.

      I'll brake it down easy for you:

      Given: Schools in poor neighborhoods provide poor education to their students. Those students grow up with a higher rate of criminality and a lower chance to enter the (fiscal) middle class.

      Suggestion: Decrease class room size (proven benefits by research)
      Suggestion: Ensure sufficient climate control (proven benefits by research)
      Suggestion: Engage the parents (proven benefits by research)
      Suggestion: Recruit passionate and competent educators and make the necessary efforts required to convince them to stay long-term (proven benefits by experience)
      Suggestion: Implement all of the above for a single school in a very bad part of town.

      Would you assert that these actions, widely implemented over a low-income, low-performing area are not likely to beneficially affect the futures of the students, families, and neighborhoods treated?

    6. Re:K-12 Education by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I suspect that if done right, it may have a marginal affect. But since there's no chance of increased spending actually being spent in that mannger, I'll have to not hold my breath.

  79. Re:Jackson is Supporting the Right to Compete by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Really? -Census reported that only one in four STEM degree holders is in a STEM job
    -Microsoft announced plans to downsize its workforce by 18,000 jobs.
    - analyses on the issues have not been able to find any credible evidence to support the IT industry’s assertions of labor shortages. http://press.princeton.edu/tit...

    So good luck with you bullshit.

  80. Jackson should critique the black community first. by Morpeth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not a racist rant, but a realistic look at some of the issues Jackson might want to address within the black community first before taking his usual stance of blaming everyone else:

    72% of black kids born out of wedlock (compared to 17% for Asians). The Rev [cough] Jackson himself had an affair & fathered a child with another woman.
    Double the unemployment rates of whites (roughly 5.4 to 11.5% as of last month)
    Why doesn't he talk about the negative affects of hip-hop culture (glorifying violence, promoting misogynistic attitudes to an extreme, promotes wealth through any (often illegal) means)
    On average, African American twelfth-grade students read at the same level as white eighth-grade students. 54% of African Americans graduate from high school, compared to more than three quarters of white and Asian students. [http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/tsr/too-important-to-fail/fact-sheet-outcomes-for-young-black-men/]
    50% of the murders in the country are committed by black men, who comprise only 6% of the total US population. NEVER talks about, but will spend endless hours race baiting over a single case like Martin.
    Look at the murder rate in Chicago, his home town (and the perps)

    As a liberal myself, Jackson's race baiting and racial profiteering sickens me -- he only uses his racial politics to advance his own ego and fatten his wallet. He hasn't been a civil rights leader in decades in my opinion, he's a self serving jerk who actually promotes racism, a dependence culture and victim mentality. He's done more damage to the black community than good, but is such a smooth talker, his fans don't see it.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  81. Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First: I'm white and I'm not a liberal. Seriously, people indicting Jackson here, and by implication defending the BS practices of high tech, with their H1-B abuse, where there IS recism at work, including racism of the kind where many, many recruiters in SV are of Indian origin, and who "hire their own". THIS is reality. What about ageism in SV?

    And don't go telling me that SV is a meritocracy!! There are so many incompetent operators (including coders) in the SV pig pen that it isn't even funny. Have you forgotten that almost everything that is put out for sale these days is bug-ridden? Get a life!

    And, Go Jesse! Bring it to these tech companies who have been getting away with EVERYTHING while they walk away with profit at the expense of everyone else.

    1. Re:Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, and it would be awesome if he would do that, or if that were remotely his intent. But Jesse just wants SV companies to hire more black people. He doesn't care about the real reason there aren't a lot of black people in tech - he just wants to force companies to magically hire more black people regardless. Indians? Ageism? Yeah a real "Civil Rights Leader" should care about that, but I guarantee he does not...

    2. Re:Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      there IS a racism problem in tech, but not the racism problem that jackson wants. The racism as you pointed out is directed to americans, white or black or hispanic, only asians seem to be protected in tech.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re: Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not just black people either, but niggers, and there is a difference.

      Educated skilled black people are being hired.

      Niggers like Chowndawanaquatious who barely graduated from Grambling State University with a degree in Computering Technology are who Jessie Jackass wants hired.

      This is why racism exists. Because of Jessie Jackson and his ilk, people are more likely to assume a skilled and intelligent black person was a diversity hire.

    4. Re: Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just black people either, but niggers, and there is a difference.

      Go back to the 1860's where you belong, trollboy!!!

    5. Re:Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by bbsalem · · Score: 1

      Fuck Silicon Valley and Fuck Stanford! What started out as electronics and computers has deteriorated into a Social Media Scam driven by prejudiced recruiters and racists paid for by unscrupulous investors and venture capitalists. It is plutocracy and elitism of the kind that led millionaires to build lavish mansions on the Peninsula long before there was any electronics.

      I live in the Bay Area, was born here and live at the north end of Silicon Valley and am rooting against its interests, against the boosters in the city governments and the state. I wish Rick Perry had lured some of the spoiled brats to Texas, they are spoiling it for "normal' people. Even Fuck U.C. for contributing to the elitism to what extant a public university can do along side a private one, creating an exceptional class who think more of themselves than they should. There needs to be far greater humility than there is and I surly hope that the overblown egos of this area will get laid low, even it it is just a property value crash. I laugh at Livy Stadium possibly not having enough infrastructure, transportation and parking to host 49'er games without causing grid lock in Santa Clara. It serves the idiots who run Silicon Valley to suffer a big crunch. When business people realize that poor management of growth and infrastructure really does hurt productivity, like it did in 1999 and 2000 when commutes were starting to cut into hours at work of all workers in SV, then they will start to look elsewhere, even Texas, and when that happens I will be happy since the Republicans have always been first advocating for growth even if it creates crunches and elites. Maybe Texas deserves Silicon Valley. In any case, nature may get the last word as SV lives on shakey ground. The Bay Area is a pull-apart basin in the San Andreas Transform system.

    6. Re: Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part is that might have been posted by a black man. Bill Cosby would have said something similar methinks... And he would have gotten the same reaction from stupid white people and self serving black people.

    7. Re: Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only real reason why Asians can get more visas and retain more jobs is because they kiss much white ass. Seriously.. " me sucky you long time..! :)

  82. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    California will become a battleground state in 2016 Election if Liberals keep it up.

  83. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jesse Jackson is not a Black leader. He does not and never has spoken for Black people. He is self serving and always has been.
    However!
    As one of the few Black men in IT, I have to say it is prejudicial almost every time I interview for a position. I have over 15 years in IT. I have done Software Engineering; SQA Engineering; Systems Engineering and Technical Project Management. There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit. But I have had more than a few instances where it was obvious to me that the questions "all of a sudden" take a weird turn. I applied for a Systems Admin position, did really well on the phone technical screen. Came in for a face to face and things took a turn. Under the guise of "I just want to see how you think" questions that are usually asked to potential Software Developers are being asked. I handled the questions with ease (a good education AND experience as a Developer). The surprise on the face of interviewer was disheartening. I knew what was being attempted. So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked. I've asked more than a few of my IT colleagues if they have had these situations and not one has. The assumption that all Blacks are from the "Inner City" "the ghetto" or "Urban" and lack education is so wrong. There are many of us that are twice as good and make half as much because of the Supremacist entitlement that pervades this culture.

  84. Re:HANG THESE SICK LEFTISTS ALREADY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear Sir:

    Please move.

    Based upon your passion and certainty, I think you would love the Libertarian Paradise that is today's Modern Somalia. Exceedingly little Government Interference. Significant numbers of gun-toting neighbors with whom to Fraternize and enjoy (vicariously, of course, after your move) your (formerly) 2nd Amendment Rights. Considerable Religious Fervor and Pressure towards Infidels and Tacit Approval of the Melding of *BOTH* Church *AND* State.

    We are of the Concerted Opinion that you should re-Locate immediately if not sooner.

    That said, and the lawyers remind us to add for legal protection:

    Be Advised: Strong Adherents of Assless-Chaps Fashion Statements should exercise Caution when exiting a domicile with a full-range pivot screen door.

  85. Re:Jackson is Supporting the Right to Compete by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

    Having conducted many tech interviews over the past 17 years, in high demand markets, I can say that the number of qualified candidates in the US is abysmally low compared to the open positions. There are lots of people with degrees in CS or a similar field, but the ones who can actually do the job at the level required is very low. If we find someone who can code well enough to do the work, we don't care how much pigmentation it has, what it's genitals look like, what gods it reveres (if any), or any of that other crap.

    The imports are absolutely necessary to keep American companies competitive in a global market. Otherwise the 21st century tech centers will be in south or east Asia, along with all the profits, high paying jobs, and resulting tax revenue.

    And what Jesse wants is money for his group, or to be on the news. He's a person who used to have power, and is now completely irrelevant. He's desperately clinging to anything he can.

  86. YO YO YO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I think Ebonics and Science might produce some unintended consequences?

  87. Re:Mod parent DOWN by microbox · · Score: 1

    Ending the war on drugs would be a good step towards breaking down the honour culture that causes so many problems for some African Americans. Don't forget that this happens because of institutionalized incentive structures.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  88. Who effing cares about skin color... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as long as code quality, intellect, and communications/social skills are present in the candidate. The issue is the lack of such attractive candidates (of ANY color)!

  89. I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has merit by echtertyp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As a white guy - born in Europe even! -- I can say that while working in Mountain View, California it was indeed overwhelmingly young, male, with mostly Northern European genes sloshing around. Some Asian but not as much as you'd think.

    That said our boss was quite a progressive guy and reached out to hire a black guy and several typical American women. The women were a disappointment. It has to be said that they proved to be demanding low performers. Had high expectations of everything and everyone else, but didn't really put points on the board for the team. In talks about the women I learned the US English codeword PITA, not the flat bread, but Pain In The A**. It was true.

    The black guy turned out well. In the first couple months he was very reserved and looking back I think he was very keen to not make mistakes or rub anyone the wrong way. But man, after that first 90 days or so, he relaxed and realized we weren't going to bite him, and he started learning the craft with real zeal. He was one of the hardest working fellows I ever met in my time in the U.S.

    I think the dynamic is that black people in the U.S. are all too accustomed to having "the prize" and opportunity dangled in front of them, and then snatched away once someone has got what they wanted from that black person. So they I think have learned to regard the larger American system with suspicion or at least much caution. However if they see by actions and not words that something is the real deal, the team is there and they are part of it, no bait and switch, they really get fired up and loving it.

  90. Speaking of unions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...one of the biggest problems for getting minorities in STEM fields is that they're trapped in horrible schools run to benefit teacher's unions rather than students.

    Indeed, some are so bad that at least one judge has found such schools to be a violation of the student's constitutional rights.

    The first step to fixing the problem is freeing minority students from lousy union schools.

  91. That's funny! MLK was a leader. Jackson a whiner & by raymorris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >. I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      That put a smile on my face. MLK was a leader, one of the best. Jackson is not a leader, he's a whiner. Also a liar. WWhas it Jesse or Sharpton who was about 8 years old when he started calling himself "Reveren"? Either way, they're the same - professional whiners. Where exactly is your church, reverend? I'll try to avoid having my daughter exposed to either of them, lying and telling her she can't do anything because of her complexion.

  92. Re: Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that takes time and they really are only interested in quick fixes that never actually address the underlying problem.

  93. drug, gang, and *victimhood* culture by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    I'll assert that even more pernicious than drug and gang culture is the culture of *victimhood*. When you believe that your failings are not your personal responsibility, and instead insist that they are someone else's fault, and that you must wait and demand for reparation from that someone else before life can continue, you end up in a morass. Mr. Jackson lives in this morass full time.

  94. There's a different echo... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Problem is, racism is stereotyped. White males are assumed to be racist, women and blacks are assumed to be less racist. Ask 10 slashdotters if white male hiring managers would be racist in their ratings of resumes, or if women and black hiring managers would be racist in their ratings of resumes, and I'll bet they'll rate the white male highest in terms of racism :)

    There is an echo chamber of social prejudice where the social prejudice of given groups is taken as natural and confirmed.

    The fact of the matter? I've met more black racists than white ones. YMMV.

    1. Re:There's a different echo... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Problem is, privilege is stereotyped. White males are assumed to be privileged, women and other races are assumed to be victims. Ask 10 slashdotters if white male hiring managers would use race and sex in their ratings of resumes, or if women and non whites would use race and sex in their ratings of resumes, and I'll bet they'll rate the white male highest in using those discriminators.

      The reality is that identity politics is building this bias into the culture and legal system under the guise of fighting it everywhere. We are supposed to default to the assumption that white males are privileged and everyone else is not, when it is everyone else who is privileged by the system so long as they lack whiteness and/or maleness.

    2. Re:There's a different echo... by jythie · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. Studies on sexism at least have shown women are just as sexist when it comes to women as men are. One of the big fallacies is the idea that racism and sexism are the domain of white males, white males are simply the ones who tend to benefit the most from it. But the social ideas about who is inferior or superior are internalized across the board, that is why the are systemic social issues rather then individual problems.

    3. Re:There's a different echo... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 0

      Cite?

      After all, I thought Sotomayor was specifically chosen because she was a "wise-latina" :) If she's just as sexist against other women as say, John Roberts, what's the point? :)

      Let's be very clear, though - regardless of what tangential and passive social ideas about inferior/superior you want to point at, that's not the critical path here. Back in the Jim Crow days, yes, overt institutionalized oppression was the blocking factor. Today, the critical path is around a victimhood culture that eschews personal responsibility and denigrates academic success as being "too white".

  95. Forced diversity in Education by Maven0 · · Score: 1

    I just had an interesting idea. If there is a disparity in the diversity of an industry, then when beginning university we should mandate that equal portions of people attend each major. We already trying to do it to businesses. Why not extend it to the university? It doesn't make any sense. I think businesses are so money hungry these days they do not care about race. Most will pick the most qualified individual for the lowest pay they can find them. Don't blame industry because of differing cultural interest in university.

    1. Re:Forced diversity in Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to my whitespaces?? sigh... post fail

    2. Re:Forced diversity in Education by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      You are about 20 years (or more) late.

      Long story made short: I was on the review/selection board for a college of engineering summer-camp program. If you were a white male, your application wasn't even considered.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  96. The root of the problem is culture & social cl by Theovon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For some reason, Americans have developed a stereotype of "white" and "black" that is related far more to social class than anything else. When you say "white," we imagine someone from the middle class. When you say "black," we imagine someone from lower socioeconomic status. How many blacks are in the middle class, I'm not sure, but as for whites in lower classes, we have them coming out our ears. While we may have millions of blacks who live in ghettos, we have 10 times as many whites living in trailor parks.

    Because of our confusion between ethnicity and social class, we end up with things like Dave Chappelle's "Racial Draft": http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/blogs/2013/06/chappelles-show-june5-racial-draft
    While amusing, it highlights the real problem, and this false stereotype is widespread throughout American culture.

    I recall an interview with Bill Cosby, talking about educational advancement among black children. Peers discourage each other from studying because it's "acting white." When in fact it is "acting middle class," because this same kind of discouragement occurs among lower class whites as well. As long as education is not valued within any group, that group will have difficulty being equally represented in white collar industries.

    What we have to work out to explain the disparity between population demographics and white collar job demographics is the proportions of the underrepresented groups who discourage education. People like Jesse Jackson want to make this all out to be the result of prejudice on the basis of genetics or skin color. Honestly, I think we're long past that. There are still plenty of racist bastards out there, but in general, we do not have pink people acting intentionally or unconsciously to undermine the advancement of brown people when it comes to getting college degrees.

    It's not PC to talk about genetic differences, but genetics is interesting. Geneticists have identified differences between different ethnic groups, and they have correlated them with some minor differences in physical and cognitive adaptations. Things like muscle tone, susceptibility to certain diseases, social ability, and other things have been correlated to a limited degree with variation in human DNA. But the average differences between genetic groups are miniscule compared to their overlap (statistically, we have very small mu / sigma for basically any meaningful measurable characteristic).

    Thus I can only conclude that correcting any disparities must come from within. Regulating businesses won't do any good, because unqualified minorities will end up getting unfairly hired and promoted. We have to start with the children and get them to develop an interest in science and math. If Jesse Jackson wants to fix this problem, he need to learn science and math and start teaching it. I assure you, even at his age, he has that capability, if he just cared enough to do it. Unfortunately for him, if he were to corrupt himself with this knowledge, he would find himself taking a wholly different approach than the "we're victims" schtick he's played most of his life. Personally, I prefer the "the universe is awesome" philosophy held by Neil deGrasse Tyson. He's one of my biggest heroes, having nothing to do with his skin tone.

    One last though: I'm sure someone will find something racist in what I have said. Either that or I'm being too anti-racist and appear like I'm overcompensating. There are also aspects of these social issues I know nothing about. I'm just writing a comment on Slashdot that is about as well-informed as any other comment. One thing people should think about in general is whether or not they have hidden prejudices. It's not their fault, having been brought up in a culture that takes certain thing for granted. Instead of burying our heads in the sand, we should be willing to admit that we probably do have subconscious prejudices. That's okay, as long as we consciously behave in a way that is fair to other human beings, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, autism, or any other thing they didn't choose to be born with (and plenty of things they have chosen, because it's people's right to choose).

  97. Re:That's funny! MLK was a leader. Jackson a whine by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >. I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      That put a smile on my face.

    Glad I could do that for ya!

    MLK is one of my personal heroes, right up there alongside Nikola Tesla and Samuel Clemens. Which is what makes it hilarious, for me, when I bitch about Jackson and Sharpton, and someone has the nerve to call me a racist for it.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  98. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many of us that are twice as good and make half as much

    That's true of white's as well in many circumstances, so don't feel too bad.

    Supremacist entitlement that pervades this culture.

    It's certainly got to be a "dark underbelly of society" kind of thing, because I see people and companies ostracized in the public space almost daily for anything that can be even misconstrued as racist. That is, unless it's about those of Asian decent. You can apparently still mock and ridicule them without being seen as racist.

  99. What about banking and media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a company is too white, it's racist... because if the black population hovers at 13% then not hiring at least 13% blacks is racism!

    This works everywhere, right? Let's say... 0.2% of the world population is Jewish. Anything more than 0.2% representation in banking, media, law, etc... is racism.
    Or so the guilty white libs insist.

    Let's clean house. It's time to "diversify!"

  100. Inevitable Outcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is the only thing you can expect when high schools in predominantly Black neighborhoods are largely terrible, and have military recruiting the likes of which you simply wouldn't believe if you hadn't already read about it.

    Like every goddamn diversity problem I think the solution is to fix education. But that would require spending money on teachers instead of just setting hiring quotas for businesses.

    So I guess that means the situation is utterly hopeless.

  101. A paucity of candidates by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    In my 30 years of software management, I was presented exactly once with a black candidate, and I hired him. Excellent programmer and co-worker. I don't know why, but there just aren't many black candidates. How can we achieve parity if there are no candidates?

    1. Re:A paucity of candidates by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      In my 30 years of software management, I was presented exactly once with a black candidate, and I hired him. Excellent programmer and co-worker. I don't know why, but there just aren't many black candidates. How can we achieve parity if there are no candidates?

      Bingo. And it is not just with Blacks. It is also with Hispanics (I'm a Hispanic engineer btw). Our communities truly suck at giving our kids the proper STEM role models.

      This could be seen as a civil rights issue, but it is not one to be taken by the tech industry. It is one to be tackled by our communities themselves. Jesse Jackson is either an asshole or he doesn't know what the hell he is talking about (with a propensity to look at everything from the "keeping-the-man-down" lenses.)

    2. Re:A paucity of candidates by MikeMo · · Score: 1

      Ya know, I meant to add the same comment for Hispanics. I've seen and hired one Hispanic programmer, also pretty good.

  102. Re:Mod parent DOWN by ilparatzo · · Score: 2

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general.

    Publicity opportunities while doing something like that are fewer and farther between. Not to mention, it's a harder goal to accomplish than simply whipping up a portion of the population into a frenzy. It's really too bad that the black leaders who are really helping to get kids into STEM or even just graduating high school at higher rates don't get all the same levels of publicity as the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jackons of the world. Not to mention that their messages likely dilute the hard work being done.

    It's one thing to scream and yell about a lack of diversity and call on that diversity to be increased. It's a whole other thing to actually do something about it, digging at the root cause and fixing the real problem. It might even make you have to face some hard truths. That is eminently more difficult. It's too bad with give more face time to the first group than we do the second.

  103. Some survival cultures are better than others. by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    Poor asian kids, fresh off the boat, in crappy neighborhoods, focus on survival but still excel in academics and escape the poverty trap.

    Certain cultures of poor american kids, born and raised in a victimhood culture, in crappy neighborhoods, focus not only on survival, but denigrate any of their peers who attempt to "act white" by speaking proper english or focusing on academics. These people don't escape the poverty trap.

    We've long gotten past the point in time where whitey is actually doing any oppressing - the victimhood culture *oppresses itself*, by making it anathema to actually succeed.

  104. It always happens eventually... by devnullrandom · · Score: 1

    The looters are coming to plunder our fields

  105. What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Posting AC because you're all a bunch of politically-correct liberal pussies who mod down anyone who doesn't hold blacks and women as the perfect creatures and dares suggest that white men and Asians might actually have any redeeming qualities."

    Absolutely!!!!! I am a 5 digit /. member and was modded so low, nothing I said was seen by anyone else....so much for freedom of speech or open to opposing view points.......I only visit /. once or twice a month and post AC if I stay on long enough.

  106. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One possible reason many managers react like that is simply because they know the reason there aren't a lot of black people in tech is because traditionally they've not shown as much of an interest in tech and it's required education per capita, so they want to make sure you're for real. Doesn't make their reaction right, but I understand where it could be coming from at least.

    To really fix the problem, as others have mentioned, we need to break the black community out of its cycle and get more black kids interested in technology and education rather than gangs and drugs. Racism in general is stupid, but that goes both ways - white on black racism and black on white racism. When I was growing up, my best friends from birth until high school were black (I'm white). I didn't understand why racism would even exist (young and naive). Then I realized a lot of black people hated me just because I was white without even knowing me, and that was disheartening.

  107. Jackson is an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As one of the down trodden minorities that work in IT as a software engineer (CS degree and MA in Chemistry) i don't want or need this mans help. All he is a poverty pimp shilling for cash from companies. I don't care if your black, white, red, blue or whatever. If you cannot handle do IT work I don't want you.

  108. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the parent post with the title "Mod parent DOWN" was meant to be funny.

  109. The Supreme Court Would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ricci v. DeStefano http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB124640586803076705
    Fisher v. University of Texas http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/10/09/supreme-court-affirmative-action/1623487/
    Michigan Proposal 2 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/us/supreme-court-michigan-affirmative-action-ban.html?_r=0

  110. Sounds fair by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Just lower the standards until all the black people are hired. Then lower them so more for all the illiterate Mexicans. And so on.

  111. Re:What Jesse wants by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?"

    I sure hope your answer was, "What the hell are you talking about? I see the moon during the day all the time."

  112. Re:Jackson is Supporting the Right to Compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends upon the company. My spouse's former employer hired on a new CEO who is a real tin Hitler. The CEO values all opinions as long as they agree with them. The CEO set out to remake the company in their image (changing logos, corporate slogans and vision statements, etc.), including insisting upon interviewing all applicants for all jobs. You had to match the CEO's ideal image of what the corporate vision is (better cover any tattoos and any other signs of individualism). In that case, one's technical competency was second to a variety of arbitrary factors. Maybe that works great for your marketers and others who are your public-facing employees, but not so well for the developers who spend all their time sequestered in their cubes. My spouse had several people highly-desirable applicants not make the final CEO cut.

  113. That's what a technical interview is by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 4, Informative

    There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit.

    I do a lot of technical interviewing, and that is the whole point of a technical interview, to verify that you actually do possess the skills that you have claimed to possess.

    It's not because you're black. It's because you're interviewing. I could tell so many stories of wild resume claims, you'd laugh.

    Here's one from today, for an interviewee who was an "expert in J2EE".

    Q: What are some different types of EJBs and how do they differ from one another?
    A: [uncomfortable silence].
    Q: Sorry, let's back up a bit. Tell me about your role in your last project that used J2EE.
    A: Uhh, I think I made a JSP once in college before I left to go work at a startup.

    As you might expect, his resume got filed away in the recycling bin.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:That's what a technical interview is by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      I put something on my CV, and got a relatively simple question that confirmed I knew more about it than the interviewer. It was tangentially related, but established me as legit.

      I asked the same question two years later with essentially the same details on the CV. Not even an attempt at the answer.

      That interview got ratcheted up in terms of expectation. Everything was questioned. Because that's all we really have to go on when trying to decide what to ask. If our ad said Oracle, and you list Oracle, we are going to ask. If you didn't list Oracle, we are going to try to fit you in somewhere by asking things other than Oracle.

      Everything on the CV is fair game. If we ask your address and it doesn't match, you should have a really good explanation for sending an out of date CV. Because I care whether I hire someone who doesn't at least say, "I can tell you what's on there, and that it's out of date."

      Because when someone asks a question, they rarely want to know what they asked. And if you can parse my question and figure out why I'm asking, I might hire you just based on ability to think. If you back up and say let's go back to this question, that shows me you can admit being wrong and background process. If you call me a day later, that shows you think about things overnight, but aren't content to just let it go.

      If you pretend any of this, I'm no psychologist, but it's going to feel really odd, and I'm going to have a hard time working with you.

      I prepare based on the CV. I interview based on the CV. I am not going to assume that the liars out there are telling the truth.

    2. Re:That's what a technical interview is by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Because when someone asks a question, they rarely want to know what they asked.

      This is absolutely true.

      For today's interview, the role had no J2EE component to it at all. But the resume said "expert", so I have to ask the question. I need to know if we're being lied to.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    3. Re:That's what a technical interview is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked.

      Actually, the crucial point of his post is this ^

    4. Re:That's what a technical interview is by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit.

      I do a lot of technical interviewing, and that is the whole point of a technical interview, to verify that you actually do possess the skills that you have claimed to possess.

      It's not because you're black. It's because you're interviewing. I could tell so many stories of wild resume claims, you'd laugh.

      Here's one from today, for an interviewee who was an "expert in J2EE".

      Q: What are some different types of EJBs and how do they differ from one another?
      A: [uncomfortable silence].
      Q: Sorry, let's back up a bit. Tell me about your role in your last project that used J2EE.
      A: Uhh, I think I made a JSP once in college before I left to go work at a startup.

      As you might expect, his resume got filed away in the recycling bin.

      He said there were questions that were legit. He then went on to say that there were questions that were not legit.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    5. Re:That's what a technical interview is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is because the applicant is Black. Black people have had to endure this shyt for years. This was long before Silicon Valley

  114. Stupid, it burns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience race or skin color has never been a factor when hiring in the tech companies I've worked at.

    We'd hire a pink martian if he could do the job.

    So perhaps these entitled fucks would care more about meeting the job requirements than whining for quotas based on irrelevant things.

  115. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Oh, of course not. It just demonstrates the hypocrisy of the accuser.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  116. Re:What Jesse wants by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

    "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?"

    I'm really curious as to the answer you came up with for this question.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  117. Visas by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    If Jackson is actually worried about racial diversity, wouldn't his proposed solution (drastically reducing the number of foreign workers by cutting H-1B visas) actually make the problem worse?

  118. There is a petition to stop hb1 visas but few have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Senator blasts Microsoft for hb1 push and firing 18000 workers
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kedfVAbXNy0
    and here is a petition to stop the hb1
    http://www.petition2congress.com/7637/abolish-h1b-visa-program/

  119. Translation: by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

    "Pay my Rainbow Coalition money or I'll make trouble"

  120. Diversity in sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There should be more diversity in sports. Top basketball and football teams come to mind. All colors of skin should be represented proportionally.

  121. Just imagine if white people had... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... their own countries... AGAIN.

    None of this nonsense would be happening.
    All the insane whites who actually want to live with non-whites could do so in NON-WHITE COUNTRIES. What a crazy idea, right?

  122. The Indians are united while the Americans are dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Senator blasts Microsoft for hb1 push and firing 18000 workers
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kedfVAbXNy0
    and here is a petition to stop the hb1
    http://www.petition2congress.com/7637/abolish-h1b-visa-program/
    Sign the petition and help solve the problem for everyone America united anyone?

  123. Re:I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ceci n'est pas une racist rant

  124. Re:Experience outside the valley--I agree by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    And if you look at the rest of the data (i.e. the "National Center for Education" "Digest of Education Statistics" "Table 322.30") :

    http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_322.30.asp

    You will notice, that if you breakdown the ethnicity into percentages of degrees conferred, for "computer and information sciences" for 2011-2012, you will see there were 47,384 Bachelor degrees earned by students, of which 30,211 identified as "white" (63.75%), 5,410 as "black" (11.41%), 4,008 as "hispanic" (8.45%), and 4,254 as "asian" (8.97%). There are also another 2,360 "non-resident alien" listed which no ethnicity is given.

    Now looking at people working at Yahoo!, 50% White (13% less than percentage earning degrees in USA in 2011-2012), 39% "asian" (30% more than percentage earning degrees), 4% hispanic (4-5% less than percentage earning degrees), 2% black (9% less than those earning degrees).

    If you look at all the other companies on that list linked in the article, you will see roughly the same trend, with "whites" having about the same proportional makeup of the companies as there are those getting degrees, asians having a much higher percentage of the workforce than are getting degrees in the US (wow, not surprising since we are importing most of this labor via H1B, green card, immigration), and blacks and hispanics having slightly lower than the amount they graduate.

    Now the lower amounts of blacks and hispanics may very well be simply due to location. The companies they looked at are Silicon Valley companies, with the majority of their workforce in California. California has a much lower percentage of blacks than say Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, etc... If you even slightly believe that the percentage of graduates are equally spread out across the nation's schools based on percentage of population in the schools, and that attendance in schools more closely mimics the population in the state (not always, there are historically african american shools as well women only or male only schools, and schools certain ethnicities would never even want to go to for many reasons), and take into consideration that most people will tend to stay close to home/family when searching for a job, and you will see that the breakdown of ethnicity in Silicon Valley tech companies is probably really not that out of step with the percentage of population in the labor market in Silicon Valley.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  125. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just remember, white people have ghetto's too.
    We call them trailer parks.
      Instead of horrible rap, they listen to horrible country, instead of shorts's that can't hide their underpants, they go even farther and skip the shirt that would hide their swollen beer bellies.
    Instead of crack, it is meth.
    Instead of black power, its white power, instead of the gangs, it is the klan. Instead of nation of Islam, it is christian identity.
    I'm not even really being funny here.
    We have a problem in this country. The problem is the number of people who are poor, under served by very basic institutions like police and schools. This problem is poverty and ignorance.
    The symptoms are always the same regardless of color or country. The society they breed becomes insular and distrustful. They turn to illegal activity both because they have few options, and because the criminals can take advantage of the lack of police and other institutions as well as the inherent will to 'not snitch' to people outside their community. Counter productive 'macho' culture thrives in places with little hope and where dog-eat-dog is not a mindset but a reality. Hopeless situations breed people that have little hope so they turn to self destructive diversions and means to gain some form of status or honor or mental escape.

    What we need is better distribution of basic services for policing and schooling. End race based affirmative action and federal funding and move to poverty based affirmative action and funding. In the end it will help people of all races more, and at the same time stop any useless criticism that the programs are based on race.

  126. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm having a hard time following your logic. Are you getting bent out of shape because he didn't name every other (irrelevant, in this case) crony group? Or does it have something to do with your assumption that GGGP is white?

  127. Re:Experience outside the valley--I agree by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    Also, I would go further, and state that simply looking at bachelor degrees does not really do justice for the statistics for those being hired by the Silicon Valley firms. If you look at doctoral degrees in Computer and Information sciences, the breakdown is 73% white, 3% black, 10.7% asian, 4.5% hispanic, of which 71.4% are male, and 28.6% are female. This reflects MANY of the disparages in workforce makeup at these companies. These companies are supposedly the best of the best, and brightest of the brightest, which means it will reflect closely those same best of the best and brightest of the brightest coming out of the education system (which means doctorates, post-doctorates, etc.).

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  128. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the finest people I've known in IT are black. Top-level OS engineers, Ace system administrators, sterling network techs. As a percentage, the number of black people I've known in IT who are above average for their skills relative to their white peers is overwhelming. And I'm not afraid to name names or give reccomendations.

    The raw number of them, alas, not so much. I've never encountered overt racism in any shop I've worked, but a few of them have been embarrassingly lily-white, and I have heard occasional rumors about what it took to get some of these people hired to begin with.

    I can sympathise, but do realize that you're also leaking "victimhood" to a fairly extensive degree, and that's an alarm signal to HR that you're an above-average risk for conflict and lawsuits, regardless of race.

    Yes, the odds aren't fair, and sucking it up sucks. But in cold practical terms, why make the odds even worse?

  129. Re:Mod parent DOWN by worldthinker · · Score: 1

    Interesting ASSUMPTIONS you're making. Why do you think that?

  130. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there will be plenty of blacks who will resent them as well, since they actually worked to get there while Tyrone just sat on his ass.

  131. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly my response to the Moon being visible during the day was, You CAN see it. The point is the questions were not appropriate for the position. I am a Director of IT now and these are not the questions that we ask of System Admins. Developers yes they need to show the ability solve problems and think critically.

  132. Re:Mod parent DOWN by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    He can fight against the pervasive drug and gang culture that keeps black kids away from any means to better themselves.

    You are confusing cause and effect. Most kids don't dream of becoming drug dealers, they simply have little choice because their schools suck and parents don't care.

    Jackson is making the point that there is talent available in the US, it just gets wasted due to lack of opportunity. Instead of lobbying for more H1B visas and employing overseas recruitment specialists the tech companies should be trying to fix the problems that prevent minorities getting the opportunity to work for them. Of course they won't do it without being forced to because business only ever does what is most profitable.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  133. JJ meets his Waterloo attacking high tech by Simonetta · · Score: 0

    JJ meets his Waterloo when he barges into the electronics lab. Even the black people in the electronics/high tech biz are about as far away from being black as you can be. All fifty of them.

    For 400 years, the Afro-american community has been desperately breeding a certain type of individual. A type of person who can survive slave work and still pass their inherent africaness into the next generation. After 20 solid generations, they created the 'African-American'.

    The technology industry is almost as old (if you see the industrial revolution and beginning of science as part of the tech industry). It too has created a certain individual type: the nerd.

    The A-As and the nerds are about as far apart as people can be. All the characteristics bred into one group were bred out of the other group. They can barely talk to each other, even when they speak the same language.

    The tech industry hires two types of people: nerds and people who support the needs of nerds. And since the tech industry is one of the most important industries in the world today, (along with food production and high finance) , they get to choose who they will pay to work for them.

    The only reason the nerds will hire black people is as office pets. And then only the ones who know the difference between flux and a capacitor. And the ones "just know" without being specifically taught that you can type "ST7735R" into Google when you want to get the 250 page manual of a thin-flat-transistor screen. And who would never bring up the subject of "mah dih'que" in the workplace. Not too many people like this around, and the ones that are, are already working in the high tech biz.

    So let's just redirect our conversation to the vast legacy of great JJ jokes that have written over the past half century. Old standards like:

    Q: What's this? fee foh fii - fii fee foh foh A: JJ's telephone number (from 1977)

    -or, the more esoteric,

    JJ visited the Middle East and met with Palestinian leader Yassir Arafat. After the meeting, JJ was overheard saying to himself: "...been a long time since I said 'Yah, sir' to anyone".

  134. Re:What Jesse wants by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked.

    Are you suggesting that it is okay for a Sysadmin to lack sufficient knowledge to answer those questions? Or that they are somehow discriminatory? I'm just not sure of your point here. I would be perfectly comfortable asking Sysadmin applicants these questions. (With the caveat that the moon is indeed sometimes visible during the day. That question is dumb. But asking why it's visible most nights is not. Interviewers can be stupid too.)

    I'm not claiming they weren't being discriminatory. Maybe they were. But that's weak evidence at best.

  135. I MUST BE A RACIST!!!1! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jackson should focus on STEM education, because shoving people into jobs they can’t do is just as bad as preventing them from getting the job in the first place.

    I work at Microsoft. There is one black person in my department. Despite being rated “5” for two years in a row (lowest 7% under the old rating system) and queued up for a “lowest-impact” rating this year (again the lowest score in the new rating system), he has kept his senior-level job while other low performers have been pushed out. He is so utterly incompetent and unable to learn that his new manager very gently inquired if he might be mentally disabled. (Possibly a third protected class, since he’s also over 40.)

    The layoffs have not hit our division yet, and the domestic purge (so far) is targeted at older workers with higher salaries who have not been promoted in 3 or more years. It will be interesting to see if they will take the opportunity to get rid of him, or if being “African American” in tech really does make one immune to actual evaluation.

    -Posting AC for obvious reasons.

  136. You dodged a bullet by bADlOGIN · · Score: 0

    It's fucking 2014. Any organization that hasn't migrated services away from EJBs must be incubating a pathetic, toxic excuse of a development environment. That job would have happily dragged your programming skills down to its level of crap and then beaten your professional passion to death. EJBs are enterprise shit-ware designed around 1999's technological constraints paired with Suns consulting/sales driven ideas about how to make money. Don't touch them. Let them die.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  137. Re:What Jesse wants by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit.

    My typical modus operandi is to scan the resume for things I've done myself, the more obscure the better. I then target that in the interview. It's amazing how often people list crap on their resume that was done somewhere in the building, but not by themselves.

    For example, I spent about 4 years in the 80's working on the 1553 bus, and considered myself an expert on the protocol, the hardware, and the usage of the bus. A few years ago some idiot put 1553 on his resume but, in the interview, couldn't answer anything about it other than "the military uses it". No shit sherlock, that's my it's full name is MIL-SPEC-1553.

  138. Clarification: HE dodged a bullet by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    Sorry. Misread your statement. Guess I was just in so much shock from the notion of anyone actively using EJBs for anything.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
    1. Re:Clarification: HE dodged a bullet by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, I don't think that I have seen an actual EJB in probably a decade. But when someone puts "expert" on his or her resume, then I need to ask about it.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    2. Re:Clarification: HE dodged a bullet by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

      Got it. You had me worried there:)

      --
      *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  139. Silicon Valley is about money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plain and simple. If you show promise that you can produce for a company, you are hired. If you do produce and keep that up, you are not fired. Yes, there is color involved here. It is the color green (ok, in light of bitcoins, the color reference is losing its meaning).

    So, now the burden shifts from the company that is hiring to society at large. Does everybody have the same opportunity to learn their trade and produce for the company? No. That has been an issue long before the tech surge and has been discussed, acted upon and continues to be acted upon. If Jesse Jackson would like to re-focus his efforts back on that aspect; no argument.

  140. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "race-traitor"

    Fuck off and go back to stormfront, you inbred shitstain.

  141. My saddest interview by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Around 2000 or so had a black guy in his 20s come in, dressed to the nines, well spoken, really likeable guy. I was his first interview and, when I met him in the lobby, he had an older white guy with him. hmmm. My interview technique is to start with softball questions to get them to relax, then get harder and harder questions. I don't want to stress them out, I want them to be themselves and give me an idea of what they know and how easy they will be to work with.

    This kid couldn't answer my softball question. Couldn't even try, he had no clue. Tried an easier question, utter failure. I kept dumbing down my questions, and it wasn't until we got to data types that he could, eventually, come up with an answer. He couldn't even answer questions from his resume.

    Thing was, as the interview went on I got to like this kid more and more. Really nice kid who seemed to have read a quick tutorial on C but had never so much as written a hello world.

    My guess is he was a disadvantaged kid who went to some program, the program did a week of classroom, no lab, wrote his resume, loaned him a suit, got him an interview, drove him there, and presented them as an experienced C programmer to companies.

  142. Where is the competence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Competence trumps race. I don't care what color you are - if you know your shit, you're hired. If you're just a mouth, move on.

  143. Tech Diversity Is Next Civil Rights Step by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I always thought the next step for civil rights was getting better proponents than Jesse Jackson.

  144. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to think the institutions are racist because they wanted some "very sharp" kid to get a GED ? This is the problem, ANYONE generally has to do that. Most of us have to get college degrees to get where we want. You who see racism see it everywhere. Same as feminists, the-everything-is-anti-israel-crowd-including-this-title, etc.

  145. Agree with him on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't often say this, but I agree with Rev Jackson on this one. I'm middle age right leaning white guy .

    1. Re:Agree with him on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      liar

  146. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Rigel47 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like this fellow followed a very beaten path of tech folk who decide to bypass college because a company wants them for their skills... and do not give a damn about their genital arrangement or skin pigmentation.

  147. Contradistory positions by BobandMax · · Score: 1

    Jackson and others routinely take the position that corporations are money grubbers that only care about profit. If that is true; why would they not hire a qualified candidate, regardless of ancestry? I strongly suspect, as another poster alluded, that this is a problem specific to Silicon Valley. But, it is clearly ripe for plundering by shakedown scammers like Jackson, who has perfected this sort of swindle to a high level.

    --

    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
    -- Pablo Picasso
  148. Re:What Jesse wants by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    1. No, he doesn't.
    2. You argue from popularity (all those liberals must be right).
    3. Insights are obvious once you have them.
    4. It doesn't require a completely unbiased take on the world to have a correct insight on one specific aspect. Hell, it doesn't even matter if you have unfounded biases about the subject in question. What matters in context is whether you're correct in that one instance.

    In this case, he is. Left wing politics is just as backstabby and self serving as neo-right politics. I find it laughable that the left wing organizations most well known for 'civil rights' are only defending the needs and whims of some, granting them de facto privilege over the rest. This applies across race, sex, orientation, and any other front these activists can cobble together (eg: anita sarkeesian, sarah sharp, rebecca watson, etc). If they were honorable, their actions would match their rhetoric about equal rights for everyone.

  149. "diversity" code word for reverse racism by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    Instead of the BEST and the brightest, clowns like Jesse Jackson & Al (not so)Sharpton want business to hire non qualified people. These two race pimps will shake down the businesses for $$$$.

  150. Re:I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has me by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    "are all too accustomed to having "the prize" and opportunity dangled in front of them, and then snatched away once someone has got what they wanted from that black person"

    what in god's name are you babbling about? I almost find that offensive, like there is some fat white man with a tux, cigar, and a monocle saying dance for me and you can have some cornbread, oops too late!

    The prize is the same for everyone here, get smart, work hard and you will do just fine, and if anything we as Americans bend over backwards to give it to "minorities" aka black people with numerous programs, if they take advantage of it great, if not tough IMO

  151. Re:The root of the problem is culture & social by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... demographics and white collar job demographics ....

    You racist.

  152. Obligatory post from KudyardRipling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Experience has shown that there exists an hierarchy of protected classes:

    1. Females espousing religions hostile to Western values
    2. Males espousing religions hostile to Western values
    3. Lesbians
    4. Gays
    5. African American female
    6. African American male
    7. Hispanic female
    8. Hispanic male
    9. Asian female
    10. Asian male
    11. Jewish female
    12. Jewish male
    13. Ethnic white female
    14. Ethnic white male
    15. Non-ethnic white female
    16. Non-ethnic white male
    17. White female
    18 White male
    19. Christian/Messianic Jew/Hebrew Christian/Talmidei Yeshua

    Religion is the essence of culture and culture is the dress of religion.

    Culture is defined as "the attempt to find a coherent set of answers to the existential questions that confront human beings in the passages in their lives".

    Only in the West is identity modular. One can change religions without invalidating an individual's claim to belong to a certain group (within limits). However, in the East, identity is considered a gestalt. Even the slightest alteration of any point no matter how minor it may appear renders that individual's claim to belong to a certain group invalid. This has real life consequences, especially in Israel. When a minority individual achieves beyond an unspoken threshold, they are reassigned as "white" for many purposes thus becoming "quasi-protected". Their membership in a protected class are only for matters negative (hate crimes) and not for matters positive (reservations, set-asides, affirmative action, positive discrimination, etc.).

  153. Jesse fail by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

    While I'm happy to push companies to prefer local talent over H-1Bs, there is no civil rights issue in high tech. Tech companies are happy to hire any candidate with the skills appropriate for the job. The public education system is certainly failing our youth and junior colleges need to expand and modernize tech programs, those are places to focus on expanding access not just for minorities, but for everyone. Considering the bad PR they get if diversity percentages are a little off, believe me companies are not avoiding minority hires. As per the wisdom of SouthPark, "Jesse Jackson is not the emperor of black people" - Token Black

  154. What? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Jackson and Sharpton both have livelihoods that depend on race issues. Both are known for race baiting, and have made careers doing just that. This is why even when no racial issues exist, they fabricate information to make them exist. These are not the only two that manipulate discrimination issues for cash. We saw recently that the NAACP will give bigots a lifetime achievement award, if the bigot gives enough money to the NAACP.

    That statement should not imply that real issues of discrimination do not exist, but rather that real issues of discrimination are diminished because of these types of people.

    It's not a shakedown for money, because that would only let you cash a check once. He wants constant racial issues, and instigates them when ever possible.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  155. Silicon Valley shakedown by Kariles70 · · Score: 1

    He could start by calling on Congress to get the corrupt H1-B Visa program cancelled. Thats the government program whereby companies import foreign citizens to do I.T. work for half or less than the current salary. It would also help everyone of every race.

  156. Re: What Jesse wants by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    How ironic that the "racial purity" types are totally unaware that us "northern white people" are in fact the bastard half-breeds of Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon. Of course, "hybrid vigor" is a well-known phenomenon... but you won't catch Darrel and his brother Darrel willing to acknowledge that; they'd rather find somebody to hate while they bang their sister... :p

  157. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... As one of the few Black men in IT, I have to say it is prejudicial almost every time I interview for a position ...

    So you think the other races had it easy ?

    You think the Latinos get through the process much easier than you, with much less prejudice ?

    How about the Asians, who do not even get any fucking break at all just because they are Asians !

    At the very least you guys - the women, the gays/lesbians, the Latinos and the Blacks - can still claim "discrimination" if you want to, the others can't !

  158. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    You seem to think the institutions are racist because they wanted some "very sharp" kid to get a GED ?

    Not at all. I don't think the institutions are racist at all. I think they saw talent.

    And because of (and in some cases, despite) the efforts of people who have fought these fights for many decades, there are now such opportunities. There was a time, not that long ago, in my lifetime in fact, when this young man would have not gotten the opportunity because of the color of his skin and his station in life.

    Now his job is to make sure he gets as much out of them as they get out of him. That is the hard fight.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  159. REAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS AT LEAST 18 PERCENT by walterbyrd · · Score: 0

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/29/Real-Unemployment-Rate-Is-at-Least-18-Percent

    Friday, the Labor Department is expected to report the economy added 235,000 jobs in July, and the unemployment rate remained steady at 6.1 percent, but that hardly tells the story.

    The jobless rate may be down from its recession peak of 10 percent, but much of this results from adults, discouraged by the lack of decent job openings, having quit altogether. They are neither employed nor looking for work.

    Only about half of the drop in the adult participation rate may be attributed to the Baby Boom generation reaching retirement age. Lacking adequate resources to retire, a larger percentage of adults over 65 are working than before the recession.

    Many Americans who would like full time jobs are stuck in part-time positions, because businesses can hire desirable part-time workers to supplement a core of permanent, full-time employees, but at lower wages. And Obamacare’s employer health insurance mandates will not apply to workers on the job less than 30 hours a week.

    Since 2000, Congress has enhanced the earned income tax credit and expanded programs that provide direct benefits to low-income workers, including food stamps, Medicaid, Obamacare, and rent and mortgage assistance.

    Virtually all phase as family incomes rise, either by securing higher hourly pay or working more hours, and impose an effective marginal tax rate as high as 50 percent. Consequently, these programs discourage work and skills acquisition and encourage single parents and one partner in two adult households not to work. Often, these motivate single people to work only part-time.

    Undocumented immigrants face more difficulties accessing these programs, and lax immigration enforcement permits them to openly take jobs that government benefits discourage low-income Americans from accepting.

    Employers can, intentionally or unintentionally, abuse the H-1B visa program, which permit businesses to employ foreign workers when qualified Americans are unavailable. Americans may be overlooked because they demand higher wages or are not networked with immigrants that are already employed in technical and managerial positions.

    The economy has created only about 6 million new jobs during the Bush-Obama years, whereas the comparable figure during the Reagan-Clinton period was about 40 million. A recent study by the Center for Immigration Studies indicates that virtually all the new jobs created since 2000 went to immigrants, whereas none were created for native-born Americans.

    Adding in discouraged adults who say they would begin looking for work if conditions were better, those working part-time but say they want full time work, and the effects of immigration, the unemployment rate becomes about 15 percent—and that is a lower bound estimate.

    Many young people are being duped both by unscrupulous for profit, post-secondary institutions—as well as accredited colleges and universities with low admission standards—to enroll in useless programs. They would likely be in the labor force now but for easy access to federally sponsored loans and will end up heavily in debt.

    Adding in these students, the real unemployment rate among U.S. citizens and permanent residents is at least 18 percent.

    Since 2000, GDP growth has averaged 1.7 per year, whereas during the Reagan-Clinton years, it was 3.4 percent. The reluctance of both Presidents Bush and Obama to confront Chinese protectionism and currency manipulation and open up offshore oil for development have created a huge trade deficit that sends consumer demand, growth, and jobs abroad.

    New business regulations, more burdensome than are necessary to accomplish legitimate consumer protection and environmental objectives, exacerbate these problems.

    All of this suppresses wages except for the most skilled and talented workers.

    No surprise, average family income, adjusted for inflation has fallen from about $55,600 in 2007 to $51,000 even as the gap between families at the bottom and top widens.

  160. White people can join by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    you know. Those various black societies are very inclusive and generally run by very nice people.

    Black people in America have lived with 200 years of institutionalized racism. I've got a black trucker friend who doesn't do runs through the South to this day. So I can't really begrudge them their societies...

    On the other hand I'd say Whites are tremendous victims of racism: their own. The right wing in this country has convinced the white man that "Welfare Queens" (read: Black people) are a bigger problem then declining wages and competing with slave labor. The think tanks aren't even very secretive about it. Google "Southern Strategy".

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:White people can join by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google, "You're a freaking idiot". Race baiter.

    2. Re:White people can join by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he is not wrong. Bigot.

  161. Re:Mod parent DOWN by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    No, actually it is a little bit of an odd comment, although I don't know if it's "racism". If there are companies who are willing to hire people incapable of doing their jobs well, then obviously they will hire cheaper labor who suck over expensive labor who suck. So the only correlation here is wage requirements. Dumber developers earn less money, news at 11.

    To jump to generalizing H1Bs or Indian H1Bs is odd. I have worked with plenty of Indian H1Bs who were extremely intelligent and much better at their jobs than their peers at the company. They also were NOT cheap to employ.

  162. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm that pain in the butt guy who asks candidates to write Fizzbuzz. I thought the whole idea of posing that question was the height of stupidity, until I actually asked it once and saw the terrible response. In the last couple of months, I've voted against people of all common local demographics - white, blacks, Asians, Indians, men, women, you name it - because they claimed to be senior programmers but couldn't write a simple little program. If I hadn't seen this with my own eyes, I'd think it was an urban legend.

    If I interview you, I will ask questions that you might find insultingly simple. I asked the same questions to the woman who was in before you. I'll ask them again to the man who comes in next. I've learned that regardless of what a resume says, I can't assume even a baseline competency from the person submitting it.

    I can't pretend to speak for everyone, of course, but I don't consider what your skin looks like. We urgently need qualified help, and you could be a gay purple Sasquatch for all I care - as long as you can program. But I'll still ask that gay purple Sasquatch to write Fizzbuzz.

  163. Re: What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But by escaping the hood and becoming an engineer, you are betraying the black community. It's only okay if you escape by becoming a rapper or baller. Then you are a hero.

    Sad but true.

  164. Hahahahahhahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a doctor and someone who had to heal with equal opportunity in college, medschool, post grad etc, all I can say now is bahahahhaahhabahahs

  165. Jesse Jackson never has to ***WORK*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yar, I think he also misunderstands the work involved as well

    It is not that Jesse Jackson misunderstands the work involved

    It is that Jesse Jackson has never had to *** WORK *** even for one single day of his fucking pathetic life as the only thing he does is giving racist speeches, shaking down corporations / municipals / college and universities to recruit / hire / admit African Americans no matter if they are qualified, or not

  166. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the guys I hired in Atlanta and Boca. My department leadership was skewed African American and female compared to the general IT work force (and to the people they were leading). Nobody in our department got hired or promoted due to race, gender or any other silly criteria. Just putting the best people we could get into the best position to help us succeed.

    I doubt very many IT companies are any different. Finding top minds is difficult, and IT doesn't work without top minds. It is nothing like Sales or even regular business management. Racism just doesn't work in the IT field.

  167. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    politically-correct liberal pussies who mod down anyone who doesn't hold blacks and women as the perfect creatures and dares suggest that white men and Asians might actually have any redeeming qualities.

    I supect that you would consider me a liberal pussy if you got to know me, but you know what? I'm actually with you so far. But it's a very very small step from your position here to "white men and Asians might actually have superior qualities."

    Also, are there actually that many documented instances of Tyrones and Nakeeshas (that bit is actually quite condescending) sitting in corners doing nothing? I kind of doubt it.

  168. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesse Jackson is fishing for votes.
    He has a Socialist inclination.
    He walks around and think preferential treatment helps.
    But it does not if you look at it closely.
    What really helps is better education technology.
    Every student studies to his/her best ability, but that seems too far into the future
    for most people.

    NERDS do not really care about ethnicity.
    In my life I have met 1 African from West in Kenya.
    He was good. Great guy. I went in the same class as him studying electronics.
    He had the unfortunate idea of replacing his women every year as he got tired of them.
    One summer in the early 80ties he showed up looking rather skinny.
    So I asked him. The answer was " I have Slim Disease".
    I never saw him again.

    So far in life I have observed 3 women repairing electronics.
    They all had Red Hair. Typical? I Dunno.

    Seemingly Iran and Israel have disproportionally many technically educated people I have known.

    For 2 weeks I sat next to a blonde - After 2 weeks she disappeared.
    Quite good looking too.
    Somebody told me that she was driving a Taxi.

    The best Radio-TV repair guy I have heard of came from Morocco.
    but I never saw him. He probably sits in a basement making lots of money.

    A few years back I attended an election.
    One of the Ladies my age told me this.
    When I was young there was A drive to get women into computing.
    "We got extra money and extra points if we chose to study computing."
    It did her no good and her profession was totally unrelated to technology.

    In technology you need genuine interest and ability.
    Only results count.

    I suspect the smartest group are like 75% white and 25% central African.
    But they are not counted as a group.
    They seem to outperform every other group at University. Be that Chinese. Japanese or Jew.
    And if 1% of technical staff have an African genetic background, I am rather curious to see the
    actual genetic composition.
    No, I am not a racist.
    It is hard to be a racist when your genetic background resembles what you
    might encounter in an Alley Cat.
    And Alley Cats have higher IQ :-)
    That is my observation.
    With me Race rhymes with Inbred.

    Jesse Jackson does not really care. He is just looking for votes.
    Maybe he can sue someone and get hold of some serious money
    to fund his election campaign.

    And yes - I am an Anonymous White and Nerdy Libertarian.

    IQ 137

    lp.org

  169. /sigh, Slashdot community are no sociologist by BlackHeron717 · · Score: 0

    LOL the slashdot community are such trolls when they want to be. If there was no racism in the industry people wouldn't be so touchy about it. If I walked up to you and said "You are a frog, ribbit ribbit, pay me." you wouldn't get angry, you would probably question my mental health and walk away. So if there isn't a problem here then why not disclose the numbers and reveal Jesse Jackson as a fraud? Oh wait, the industry is perpetuated by racist institutions so that will be fought tooth and nail. And the communities most engrossed in the industry perpetuate this fallacy that they are superior in some way because they provide a vital service. Well, there were communities in the north during the early 1800's who never wanted to end slavery because that would mean competition for factory jobs from newly freed slaves. I have a suspicion that we are once again faced with racism driven by labor concerns.

    1. Re: /sigh, Slashdot community are no sociologist by BlackHeron717 · · Score: 0

      I guess my comment hit a nerve with the mods, how sad they reject logic as trolling, they must have really been butt hurt about being called frogs.

  170. Re:I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has me by BlackHeron717 · · Score: 1

    The prize is the same for everyone here, get smart, work hard and you will do just fine, and if anything we as Americans bend over backwards to give it to "minorities" aka black people with numerous programs, if they take advantage of it great, if not tough IMO

    Correction sir, what the hell are YOU talking about? Those programs are barely designed to level the playing field that is the byproduct of generations of gerrymandering and gentrification of black neighborhoods which disenfranchise them on the education level. Not even the internet has been able to level the education gap because service providers underserve minority neighborhoods.

  171. Re:What Jesse wants by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Was there a racial element to the interview? Probably, given that black men are very rare in IT and that people are not used to dealing with unusual things in many ways. However, these sound like typical dumbass "brainteaser" questions:

    So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked.

    The problem is they're not really brainteasers, in that they're fun "impossible" or "off the wall" questions.

    The first is a rather fun question and has had many solutions with a rather interesting history. If you've happened to done any civil engineering, then you may have covered streamflow measurement in which case the first answer is somewhat nuanced and based on the size of the river, number of measurements required and various other constraints.

    The second one is the old "why are manhole covers round" in that the question is outright wrong.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  172. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never understood this. Here is SV, there is widespread hiring of Indian Americans (and Indian Foreigns) -- people who both look different than "white" people, and who have a different culture. I don't understand how a US-based African American (or Hispanic Americans) would be any less competitive than a US-based Indian American on just a visual appearance or cultural basis.

    Likewise, every place I've worked has had a very difficult time hiring qualified candidates. I hope HR people weren't screening people out by race or appearance -- I could have really used the help from anyone who was even remotely qualified!

  173. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many of us that are twice as good and make half as much because of the Supremacist entitlement that pervades this culture.
    Applies to many of us Indians too. Even if some of us steal your jobs, we are still wage-slaves due to the visa rules and are just pretending that we are treated with respect.

  174. Re:What Jesse wants by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    Jesse Jackson is not a Black leader. He does not and never has spoken for Black people. He is self serving and always has been.
    However!
    As one of the few Black men in IT, I have to say it is prejudicial almost every time I interview for a position. I have over 15 years in IT. I have done Software Engineering; SQA Engineering; Systems Engineering and Technical Project Management. There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit. But I have had more than a few instances where it was obvious to me that the questions "all of a sudden" take a weird turn. I applied for a Systems Admin position, did really well on the phone technical screen. Came in for a face to face and things took a turn. Under the guise of "I just want to see how you think" questions that are usually asked to potential Software Developers are being asked. I handled the questions with ease (a good education AND experience as a Developer). The surprise on the face of interviewer was disheartening. I knew what was being attempted. So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked. I've asked more than a few of my IT colleagues if they have had these situations and not one has. The assumption that all Blacks are from the "Inner City" "the ghetto" or "Urban" and lack education is so wrong. There are many of us that are twice as good and make half as much because of the Supremacist entitlement that pervades this culture.

    A friend of mine runs, and has run for many years, the network department of a private bank in New York. He is black (oh, sorry Black) coming originally from Jamaica (the island not the borough).

    What he told me, back when I was working for him, is that in his opinion blacks in America tend to cause themselves problems that don't actually exist. He was quite worried, at the time, that his son would pick up the 'we are persecuted' mentality and drop his own level of achievement to try and fit in with the other black students in his school.

    I grew up in a home for children. We all had nothing and, arguably, we all had the same living environment growing up. I saw this exact thing happen with one of my 'brothers' who was black. He was living the same as me - same room, same money, same people around us. He went to the same schools that I did. The difference was that he picked up the 'we are persecuted' mentality and started acting black to fit in. Things only got worse from there, which I won't go into. The long and short of it is that I think that my friend from Jamaica is right. Even where there is no persecution, American blacks create problems for themselves.

    Obviously this is a generalization. There are plenty of successful black people who have never let themselves be stopped by anything - least of all themselves.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  175. horse hockey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT is and should be meritocracy, have the ability have the job, screw this entitlement mentality.

  176. Jesse Jackson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesse is a filthy, greasy, lazy, shiftless, no-account thug...

  177. Joe Biden for 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe Biden is a square shooter. Joe Biden for 2016

    1. Re:Joe Biden for 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joe Biden is a square shooter. Joe Biden for 2016.

  178. Next Civil Rights Step. No, It Is Not. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Tech Diversity Is Next Civil Rights Step

    Not, it is not. Instead of scrutinizing tech companies why they have low % of African American and Hispanic engineers (I'm a Hispanic engineer btw), they should scrutinize those communities (my community included) as of why they produce fewer %s of engineers compared to non-Hispanic Whites (or worse, against Asian/Asian American communities.)

    This is not a case of tech companies discriminating against X or Y ethnic group. It is about our communities doing a piss-poor job at ensuring our kids a proper education and get proper role models.

    Yes, Hispanic and African American communities have suffered systematic discrimination in the past (specially African Americans). But we past that point a long time ago, and the balance has been pointing towards community responsibility for quite some time.

    Jeese Jackson is an asshole and an attention whore. He is stirring up this shit, race baiting the tech industry as a means to stay relevant. Sadly, there will be enough dumb masses that follow him.

  179. Re:What Jesse wants by HnT · · Score: 1

    Can't be long now before Spike Lee "discovers" this and squeezes a few "oh so controversial" movies out...

    --
    "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
  180. Jesse Jackson? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Would someone shut that race-bating, hypocritical piece of shit up already?

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  181. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's going to read to the athletes and rappers?

    Guess you're trying to be funny but it was a miss. Even though I'm no fan of Jesse Jackson, he does make a point. And yes, there are many qualified blacks (since some of you are afraid to say blacks) who are not being given a fair shake even when they (I) are more than qualified for the job.

  182. Re: What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Posting AC because you're all a bunch of politically-correct liberal pussies who mod down anyone who doesn't hold blacks and women as the perfect creatures and dares suggest that white men and Asians might actually have any redeeming qualities."

    Asians! WTF is this AC talking about. He's OBVIOUSLY ASIAN cuz he keeps sticking Asians in his comment. Dude, it's a white man's world. Recognize biatch!!!

  183. The problem isn't color of one's skin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey I agree with you except one aspect. Stop thinking that what you see on the news, movies and hear on those radio talk shows depict the black American population as a whole. There are more honest, hard working blacks that make up America than you're willing to open your eyes to see.

  184. Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JJ is a RACE PIMP.

    Any questions?

  185. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't confuse hard questioning with racism.

    I have hired many developers in my time - I and most others I know are certainly not concerned with color. I've hired all races. What I am concerned about is BS artists who try and pretend they have more development experience and knowledge than they really have. Most IT shops are under such pressure that they really are simply desperate for anyone - whatever color - who can help with deadlines, etc.

    I am white, but in years passed when I was interviewed I had searching questions similar to yours. Ironically the CEO of the company was black, but I did not ascribe the hard questioning to reverse racism. Just common sense.

  186. Too little, too late? by carys689 · · Score: 1

    Mr. Jackson apparently has run out of other things to crab about, so he is going to start crabbing about the lack of diversity in high-tech. U.S. affirmative action has been around for over 50 years and during that time there has been enormous opportunity for blacks and other minorities to get an edge on education, often at the disadvantage of more qualified whites, and improve their ability to get better paying jobs whether it is in high-tech or elsewhere. By and large, for whatever the reasons, with relatively rare exceptions, the black/non-white community, in general, has failed to avail themselves of this. To claim racial discrimination at this point is ludicrous.

  187. Yes. As long as he supports whites in the NBA. by yenic · · Score: 1

    As long as this also have a simultaneous effort to promote opportunity for whites in the NBA, then I'm all for it.

    Also, I like the cut of his anti-H1B jib. But as long as we're identifying areas where the white community is under served as well. I'd recommend starting with the NBA.
    It's not a lack of talent, it's a lack of opportunity.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
  188. Re:I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truth is, 90% of black people in the US are primitive brutes with zero civility and no dignity whatsoever. 10% are just like everyone else. Everyone else meaning every single other race and creed you can imagine who manages to act like human beings most of the time.

    For those other races, the rest of us, about 10% are garbage and 90% are good. Just my approximation living about 3 blocks from some of the worst ghettos in the United States for the past 5 years. I've also lived in the south, and they're a little more 'reserved' there for a while- but still complete scumbags. Lying, cheating, good for nothings breathing oxygen that would be better saved for the rest of the world.

    This comment won't be popular with the crusading white knight types (which in the nerd community, they are aplenty). But it is true nonetheless.
    There's good reasons why the KKK existed in this country. It wasn't completely mindless. Though I don't support violence at all, outside of self defense.

    Once you live around them in large numbers, it's quite the wakeup call.
    It's not racism if its reality.

  189. Re: What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Bob Newhart Show take place in new england

  190. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Impressive concern trolling. Quality narrative structure and good overall flow, with just enough ambiguity about your own race to make a careless reader think you might have an actual clue what you're talking about. 8/10.

  191. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complaining to people on the internet about the existence of racism in tech is a far cry from complaining about it to HR during your interview. Why would you assume anything he's saying here remotely indicates how he might interact with HR at any given employer? Most people are capable of going about their day-to-day jobs without publicly airing their frustrations with internal management/HR processes.

    But your comment itself is a bit telling, too. If HR makes these same kinds of assumptions you just did -- someone who's black is more likely to believe we are being racist, and someone who believes we are discriminating against him based on race is more likely to sue -- then that itself could create a negative feedback loop whereby the discrimination itself justifies even more discrimination. Nice little trick, eh? "Oh, it's not that I'm racist; it's just that I'm protecting myself against the possibility that you might argue I'm being racist." People who think like this probably even manage to fool themselves into thinking that this is a totally logical and justifiable way to behave, and that it's actually meaningfully different from, you know, "real" racism.

  192. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, don't be silly. Isn't there a /. post just about every day or so about how all the diversity initiatives and minority scholarships are giving women and non-whites unfair advantages in tech? If social media is any indication, racism and sexism against white men is so prevalent that it's one of the only topics worth detailed criticism in these discussions!

  193. Re: What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, New England doesn't have yokels?

  194. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because none of the other ACs might be posting AC for the same reason? Because /. NEVER mods down left-leaning posts on controversial topics like this one? No of course -- only the poor, persecuted point of view that white men hold all the power due to a merit (a viewpoint that has prevailed in the western world for pretty much its entire existence) are the ones who are unfairly silenced and bullied! That DEFINITELY never happens to people who hold the totally accepted and unquestioned point of view that unfair sexist and racist biases linger in a society that mostly proclaims belief in equality. Right. No one EVER questions or bullies people who express that point of view -- like by calling them "politically-correct liberal pussies" or by presuming that people with stereotypically black names are lazy or something similar. And people DEFINITELY never downmod us. Nosirree, you're the only person who ever gets persecuted, you poor thing you.

  195. Re:What Jesse wants by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

    Thank you so much for having the courage to speak up on this topic on /.

    I so hope the young wet behind the ears passionate naive millennials who actually believe the propaganda spewed by the so called civil rights leaders on MSNBC... Propaganda carefully crafted to make people angry and send money to greedy people who only have their own self interest at heart... These people do not speak for the majority of blacks, nor do they represent black culture, nor are they doing blacks any favors.

    I have personally seen racism in many forms it makes me sick. Literally physically sick.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist
  196. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    I really admire the way the CEO of Cypress Semiconductor refused to knuckle under to Jackson back in 2001 after Jackson labeled Cypress a "white supremacist hate group.’” I hope every Silicon Valley target of his does the same.

    T. J. Rodgers. One of my very favorite comments on Jesse Jackson ever: "Jesse Jackson is like a seagull. He flies in, craps all over everything, then flys out again."

  197. Jackson has a point but misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly African Americans are under-represented in Silicon Valley. That's obvious. So are women. Some minorities, particularly South Asian are over represented. Silicon Valley isn't any more racist than other regions/sectors... perhaps less so given the influence of minorities from high power engineering and science programs. The CEO of Microsoft is from India. He no doubt faced similar racism, but had access to education and opportunity before he entered tech,

    The issue Jackson should be addressing is inner city education and opportunity. Inner city residents in general get lousy public education... especially minorities. Job opportunities are scarce, which gives any kid growing up a greater icentive to try other avenues. And some do. That is the essential problem. To a great extent Silicon Valley cannot fix that problem. Yet Jackson's constituents could go for the root issue... poor education and overall opportunity.

    Jackson's efforts should be aimed at making himself obsolete by addressing core issues versus making himself relevant by addressing tangential issues.

    America is stronger without racism... much stronger. So is Silicon Valley. But at the core are stereotypes perpetuated by a failed system, failed opportunities, not by pigment fear. Let's turn inner cities into equal opportunity and access zones. That will be great for our country and foe all of the kids being kept away from teh American Dream.

  198. Re:I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has me by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    oh and the poor non minority neighborhoods are not also under-served? I just find it interesting that there are 1 million and 1 programs to serve area's like inner city minorities as if there aint a poor white kid living in the ghetto as well

  199. just how many black geeks are out there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funny I attended a redneck heavy rural Texas branch school of one of the 2 big university systems in Texas and we had a decent amount of minority students not quite mirroring the US population but in my time there it had gone from too few black students for them to simply hang with all black friends basic human social needs forced them to befriend the others. BY graduation enough had been recruited by my major advisor who was the NAACP president for my campus that they didnt have to meld as much and they were maintaining hood style slang rather than adopting more mainstream white manners of speaking.

    I was a business degree major with many friends getting computer degrees and as a self taught coder I spent alot of time with them in the schools computer labs. NO black students were opting to major in computers and only a few Hispanics were doing so

    so Jesse just how many geeks of color do you know personally?

  200. Jese Jackson is right to expose this racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not at all surprised that these companies are
    totally racist in their non hiring of "non White" staff,
    as I have pointed out before, when Women are spoken of in such matters,
    it is White women who have got and get the job,
    the statistics which go with this article on USA Today,
    are a damming indictment of ongoing White American and White world racism.
    What is more repugnant about this case is that the companies named
    are the ones who in particular young people have faith in,
    for being trendy, hip, modern and non racist.
    The racial makedown of the staff goes someway in explaining why social media sites have become such a haven for some of the most vile and disgusting racists on our planet.
    Were more Black and people of color involved in these companies, and
    I don't just mean in the catering and cleaning department,
    but throughout the staff and hierarchy,
    then groups such as "Stormfront", "No White GeNocide" and
    a host of other nazi minded detritus,
    would not find a safe place
    from where they can spread their poison and
    recruit for their racial war machinations.
    Stormfront alone is implicated in over 100 murders.
    I have campaigned against the Boeremag race terrorists,
    who tried to bomb Nelson Mandela, start a race war then
    drive all "non Whites" out of the country and
    set up a Whites only state in Africa.
    Facebook has banned me from their site for
    campaigning for them to take down
    the Boeremag terrorist support page.
    Twitter followed suit and not only banned me, but
    insist on finding racists and nazis for me to "follow".
    America is at about 15% African American,
    that should be reflected as a minimum,
    not just in the tech companies, but
    across the board and the other so called "minorities"
    should be represented at least by their percentages too.
    If these companies want to act in a racial way,
    let them move to where they have only their own race and
    deprive America of the revenue and
    the shame which they are helping to maintain.
    This is a Civil and Human Rights Issue,
    which all races should band together and fight.

    Please sign the petition against the Boeremag support page on Facebook
    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/580/770/040/facebook-stop-hosting-terrorists/
    read more on the blog
    http://natturner1.wordpress.com/
    A scoop of Twitter suggestions to "follow" http://sco.lt/7PPFJJ

  201. Jesse Jackson Civil Rights Leader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gosgog:
      Martin Luther King is dead! He was & still is the "CIVIL RIGHTS LEADER"!! Jesse Jackson is a nothing, who has self attached himself to the myth that he is a leader. He isn't a leader of anything at all. Unfortunately today's Press has fallen for his line of Bullshit, and as a result he has a few idiot supporters who finance him. What has he ever actually accomplished other than the ability to get Cash in his pocket & press recognition...NOTHING!

  202. Re:What Jesse wants by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Don't pay taxes. Tell your regime to go and PRINT dollars for its Extravagance.

  203. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in a number of engineering departments. in the 40m years i was employed in silicon valley. In those 40 yrs I can only remember 2 black individuals that could cut the mustard and be a participating member of any engineering dept. I saw many blacks fail to make the grade, They bull shitted there way into being hired and of course failed very shortly after .....

    i remember one dude from Panama (Wes Jones) that was the head of a Mfg Engineering dept. This dude really knew his shit. When he came to me with a problem I knew he had throughly diagnosed it and it was problem..... He save my ass a number of times....

    Unfortunately there were not many , which is sad...... With proper training and experience I'm sure there would be more.....

  204. JJ has never visited Verizon IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a very large percentage of minorities. I don't work there, but have consulted there. I can't cite numbers. Anyone from Verizon who can verify?

  205. Re:What Jesse Wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, I am not an anonymous coward but I guess you have to join and log into the site in order to comment and I haven't done that. I certainly don't like being manipulated by a website (or those horrible Facebook posts that guilt you into passing on their cause -which I never do), so I'm still anonymous. I'm sure that since the article is on IT stuff, someone can find me out. And I don't know anything about racism in the IT world and I am white as white can be I guess and almost 60 years old. Nevertheless, I hear your story and I am livid. I keep thinking that we are making progress in racism in America and maybe I am just fooling myself. This burns me up, so I am just writing to sympathize with you personally. I don't know when it (racism) will end - not until hearts are changed I guess. Yet, I don't think Jesse Jackson, although alerting people to the cause, is a very good lobbyist for the cause. I hope you can continue to progress in your field despite these sinful interviews. Encouragement is about all I have to offer.

  206. Re:The root of the problem is culture & social by strikethree · · Score: 1

    Peers discourage each other from studying because it's "acting white." When in fact it is "acting middle class," because this same kind of discouragement occurs among lower class whites as well.

    "Acting middle class" is merely another way of describing yourself as a servant. They have correctly identified that we are all servants and that the best that they can hope for is to be marginally better off than some others. This is a total ripoff and they know it. There is an ENORMOUS amount of wealth out there and 90% or more of us will never get to touch even a small amount of it. Why work so hard for so little? Fuck it, be a gangsta and live free (until you go to prison).

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen