Not too terribly long before everything's a sealed box and it's illegal to tamper with hardware or code (just as with the right to defend oneself, there'll be demonstrably-obvious false-flag events to entice the ignorant and illogical populace to give up their rights... and they will).
These are desperate times; desperately stupid and unimaginative, that is: the dummies lack good ideas and all they can do is race to out-copy each other.
I got 111.23GB (3840 x 2160 x 32bits/pixel x 60 x 100, divided by 8 to get bytes... and divided by 1024 three more times)...
As for encoding, I only have decoding experience with h. 265 and that's intensive enough; I doubt there's a consumer-level computer in existence that can do it in realtime... maybe a massively-multicored chip like a Threadripper could, in theory...
The issue isn't the politicians per se, though - It's the voters.
What are you smoking?? It's both: you've got sociopathic politicians with IQ's slightly above average, who manipulate hordes of drooling morons by lying through their teeth.
Smart, insightful... and nonetheless incorrect (I realize it was sarcasm on one level), as you're only accounting for one factor and not others. This psychotic nonsense will follow in the footsteps of the 'Self-Driving Craze' and it'll be pushed by the same non-technical types.
There's just too much desperate stupidity for it not to.
That was certainly true up until fairly recently but It's flipped: get the fucking Neocons and Fundies out of the Republican Party and you're left with a far more enlightened approach to ensuring personal freedom than the "Left" (i. e. "the other right").
You can vape weed if you want to avoid combustion products, such as tar, which is cancerous the same way it is in cigarettes.
While the vast majority of potent carcinogens in tobacco smoke are caused by the hundreds of fucked-up additives, the "tar" from burning weed has been shown to have beneficial properties. Perhaps it's not best administered through the lungs... but there's still no comparison.
Slashdot Mirror
Not too terribly long before everything's a sealed box and it's illegal to tamper with hardware or code (just as with the right to defend oneself, there'll be demonstrably-obvious false-flag events to entice the ignorant and illogical populace to give up their rights... and they will).
These are desperate times; desperately stupid and unimaginative, that is: the dummies lack good ideas and all they can do is race to out-copy each other.
No, actually. It's like charging for Blind-Spot-Assist.
Dunno what what I was thinking but I did it again and got 6.7TB (3840x2160x32x60x60x60, divided by 8, 1024, 1024, 1024...).
As for encoding, I only have decoding experience with h. 265 and that's intensive enough; I doubt there's a consumer-level computer in existence that can do it in realtime... maybe a massively-multicored chip like a Threadripper could, in theory...
Things have gotten much better.
And your statement can be easily prove just by looking at users' fondness for Windows 10.
Or not, as the case may be.
The issue isn't the politicians per se, though - It's the voters.
What are you smoking?? It's both: you've got sociopathic politicians with IQ's slightly above average, who manipulate hordes of drooling morons by lying through their teeth.
It's the candy-flavored vape pens (and if you ask PopeRatzo, the candy-flavored shooters) that you've got to worry about.
Isn't Trump a teetotaller?
Perhaps it's the opposite: he could have a metabolism that naturally produces alcohol... in large quantities.
. How long before an AI realizes people will like it better if it gives them free stuff?
Shortly after my ancient PS/2 Model 80 "realizes" the same thing (we are talking about lines of code, right??).
No question about it; this has very much been my experience as well.
There's just too much desperate stupidity for it not to.
"Sleight."
and thus make the code more elegant but less efficient
Huh??
No, just bring your own wallpaper.
Perhaps that was the original idea behind Furries...
That's fetish material in certain circles..
California politicians.
thus
It's a stupid, insidious habit; doesn't mean it should be illegal - thus or no thus.
So...have the health effects of pot been fully researched by the government?
Lots and lots and lots of bogus, paid-for "studies" intended to show how terribly bad it is... do those count??
That was certainly true up until fairly recently but It's flipped: get the fucking Neocons and Fundies out of the Republican Party and you're left with a far more enlightened approach to ensuring personal freedom than the "Left" (i. e. "the other right").
Don't know but I guess they must contain an awful lot of propylene glycol...
I always assumed that a large component of what makes smoking cigarettes directly harmful was the nicotine.
The nicotine is bad; the additives are far worse.
You can vape weed if you want to avoid combustion products, such as tar, which is cancerous the same way it is in cigarettes.
While the vast majority of potent carcinogens in tobacco smoke are caused by the hundreds of fucked-up additives, the "tar" from burning weed has been shown to have beneficial properties. Perhaps it's not best administered through the lungs... but there's still no comparison.
There's another solution to this: don't ask a fucking Englishman how to roll a joint..