Demanding better is why we moved away from Firefox in the first place.
No, you traded convenience for your privacy. Chrome was never better enough to justify an inch of the miles of records they got from you.
company usage
I will admit, my advocacy comes from a personal usage. Having been market-forced into supporting Chrome in my professional setting, I am familiar with the product.
However, you're talking about a free product in either case. On what a business values, they'll spend money.
When the word about Dragonfly came out, I knew that had to put my principles before my convenience
Google is now, and I believe irrevocably, not a company with whom I want to do business. They took their advantage and have firmly leveraged it against the public interest.
Advertising networks, and Google's specifically, need to be dealt with by the FTC immediately. We have the right to be secure in our correspondence in the USA. "Let me move your correspondence for free, and I will read everything about it, compile it, and sell what I can" is not a contract many people would join if the terms were laid so plainly.
"In machine learning, a convolutional neural network (CNN, or ConvNet) is a class of deep, feed-forward artificial neural networks, most commonly applied to analyzing visual imagery. "
Right: to even be granted standing as the injured party, they'd have to prove they DO have said authority over California ISP contracts. Which, as you point out, they say they don't.
AC below also brings up the FTC angle, but I can't think of any instances where the FTC has gone after states rather than businesses anywhere around this topic.
Slashdot Mirror
Demanding better is why we moved away from Firefox in the first place.
No, you traded convenience for your privacy. Chrome was never better enough to justify an inch of the miles of records they got from you.
company usage
I will admit, my advocacy comes from a personal usage. Having been market-forced into supporting Chrome in my professional setting, I am familiar with the product.
However, you're talking about a free product in either case. On what a business values, they'll spend money.
TFS is about Google.
Are you going to say something relevant, or are you too busy?
That was so productive! Is anyone paying you to trash Mozilla?
You are correct: THIS is not a particularly alarming amount of fuel added to the burning privacy inferno that is Alphabet.
Hey, FUCKING MORON, this is about trust, not technology.
That does nothing to fix the problem: Google is an advertising company that makes money from your communications & patterns.
Get more tech people back on Firefox. Demand *BETTER*.
Beyond that, any organization with any "Chrome-only" functionality needs to take a hard look at what the lives of people in China are worth.
When the word about Dragonfly came out, I knew that had to put my principles before my convenience
Google is now, and I believe irrevocably, not a company with whom I want to do business. They took their advantage and have firmly leveraged it against the public interest.
Advertising networks, and Google's specifically, need to be dealt with by the FTC immediately. We have the right to be secure in our correspondence in the USA. "Let me move your correspondence for free, and I will read everything about it, compile it, and sell what I can" is not a contract many people would join if the terms were laid so plainly.
Specifically, I was talking to the person who supplied the OP of this thread. They have not recognized your initial conditions.
I was asking for a human opinion. I know how to find them.
Sorry, the burden is shifted now so that you must DEFEND why anyone would use Chrome at all. Browsers have a few jobs, but Chrome does so much more!
On a related note, can anyone recommend a good lightweight XMPP chat client for Android?
Amateurs. Let the business world know that these clowns can't be trusted with serious matters.
"In machine learning, a convolutional neural network (CNN, or ConvNet) is a class of deep, feed-forward artificial neural networks, most commonly applied to analyzing visual imagery. "
Neil Gorsuch appointed to supreme court.
...Presidents get to nominate SCJ's, so that's not a "promise" unless you're attempting to be clever re: Garland.
Peace with North Korea.
Wake me up when the N&S actually sign a peace treaty.
Moved the US embassy to Jerusalem as promised.
Again, function of the Executive branch. Do you want credit for keeping the National Parks open, too?
Draining the swamp, watch the action when the FISA documents get released.
Oh man, I want you to remember that you said this :)
Well he said we'd have a great relationship with Russia
.............conceded.
Are you day-drinking?
What was the last high-profile promise you can remember actually being fulfilled?
The two slit experiment stops giving a diffraction pattern as soon as you measure which slit the photons/electrons/whatever go through.
as soon as you measure which slit the photons/electrons/whatever go through.
as soon as you measure which
you measure
measure
...You sure you understand what the weirdness is?
Just like Volkswagen!
uninformed point of view
Guardian tech story
Pick two.
The Feds don't have authority, but neither do the states.
The states lack authority because of the commerce clause.
No, they don't. Not when it comes to how businesses in their state are allowed to operate. Citation: Tenth Amendment.
They have really good propaganda ...
Right: to even be granted standing as the injured party, they'd have to prove they DO have said authority over California ISP contracts. Which, as you point out, they say they don't.
AC below also brings up the FTC angle, but I can't think of any instances where the FTC has gone after states rather than businesses anywhere around this topic.