My bad, I probably misunderstood the noble goal of replacing state owned currencies with people owned cryptocurrencies as something that was actually looked forward to.
I think that exposing the source code complements blind validation by allowing experienced programmers to detect failures that would not otherwise be detected by a controlled experiment. Also, Dieselgate.
I fully agree to the plaintiffs in this situation and I fully disagree with all arguments put forward by the company's owner. There's no hypocrisy regarding the non-tried suspects, and the fact that guilty people might have gotten off without even going to trial due to his software claiming innocence even worsens the case.
Nonsense... The guy says it's not necessary "because his company runs its own validation testing". Why can't you trust the guy and his company to validate his own stuff? Why??
I'd find sorting based on score much more useful than first-come-first-served. The score would have to be unlimited for it to work, or sorting score be somehow separated from the -1 to 5 scoring system.
Maybe supporting both sorting methods would make everybody happy.
I consider myself a nerd, and this matters to me. I also infer that nerds in general would be interested in more than tech news, including a US border scandal happening abroad and involving the religion in the spotlight, but I may be wrong.
Maybe since that motto is no longer visible, it may well no longer be the guide for its content subjects. If that's the case, a newer guide doesn't seem to be visible anywhere else either, so assume "tech/geek" at your own risk.
From the NCA link, about interest in programming and spending all night online:
Many of these are just normal teenage behaviours and don't necessarily suggest a young person is at risk of getting involved in cyber crime. But if a young person is showing several of these signs, try and have a conversation with them about their online activities.
As for the utility, if there are situations where a plot or solve 1/x for every x is necessary, I imagine there would be situations where it should be workable even if [.'. x] includes 0 without the algorithm being deemed broken because there's no "if x != 0 then 1/x else ???" in it.
What about when the doctor himself prescribes the antibiotics for a cold or flu against the patient's own judgement, without doing any test for bacterial infection?
An electrical heater is not a system, it's just part of one. The system itself would at least involve the energy source and the transporting medium, where the losses continue to hold true the fact that there's no 100% efficiency in any system. If there were, Entropy would have no meaning.
If you take the isolated case of the heater as being 100% efficient because in itself it's able to convert 100% of its input energy into wanted heat (which itself is discutable, since there may still be losses through electro-magnetic emissions, vibrations, etc. that would not be captured by the room and transformed into heat, even though all that would be as negligible as contesting gravity acceleration as not being 9.8m/s^2 in most cases), you'd just as well pick a heat pump which, with the same amount of input energy, "produces" 3 times more heat.
What I meant is that the fact seems to be "electricity is way more efficient than combustion" rather than "electricity is 100% efficient. Gas is not".
As far as my ignorance in the laws of Physics goes, it's simply impossible to have any system running at 100% efficiency because it automatically implies zero loss of energy.
Electric systems lose energy everywhere: conduction materials have impedance, motors have friction *and* generate inductive impedance, photons are created...
Slashdot Mirror
@Beauhd, please fix this post...
Or, they've lost focus and it's showing (my opinion).
My bad, I probably misunderstood the noble goal of replacing state owned currencies with people owned cryptocurrencies as something that was actually looked forward to.
Out of curiosity, have you considered that scenario with half the masses counting on their bitcoin portfolio to pay their rent?
They considered a few other options to classify Uber, like a mid-sized sedan, swamp gas, camera smudge, or man in ape suit.
I think that exposing the source code complements blind validation by allowing experienced programmers to detect failures that would not otherwise be detected by a controlled experiment. Also, Dieselgate.
I fully agree to the plaintiffs in this situation and I fully disagree with all arguments put forward by the company's owner. There's no hypocrisy regarding the non-tried suspects, and the fact that guilty people might have gotten off without even going to trial due to his software claiming innocence even worsens the case.
Nonsense... The guy says it's not necessary "because his company runs its own validation testing". Why can't you trust the guy and his company to validate his own stuff? Why??
As Weird Al once said... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t039p6xqutU
I'd have loved to see Chrome and Firefox popping up such notices in retaliation :)
I'd find sorting based on score much more useful than first-come-first-served. The score would have to be unlimited for it to work, or sorting score be somehow separated from the -1 to 5 scoring system.
Maybe supporting both sorting methods would make everybody happy.
"News for nerds, stuff that matters".
I consider myself a nerd, and this matters to me. I also infer that nerds in general would be interested in more than tech news, including a US border scandal happening abroad and involving the religion in the spotlight, but I may be wrong.
Maybe since that motto is no longer visible, it may well no longer be the guide for its content subjects. If that's the case, a newer guide doesn't seem to be visible anywhere else either, so assume "tech/geek" at your own risk.
Hope that helps.
From the NCA link, about interest in programming and spending all night online:
Many of these are just normal teenage behaviours and don't necessarily suggest a young person is at risk of getting involved in cyber crime. But if a young person is showing several of these signs, try and have a conversation with them about their online activities.
What exactly am I supposed to be shocked about?
To block you from doing distracting tasks while driving such as editing a playlist or browsing your contact list.
...Until Ethan Hunt needs to get something from it.
Ah right, so it's actually:
1/0 = ÃS'
0ÃS' = 1
As for the utility, if there are situations where a plot or solve 1/x for every x is necessary, I imagine there would be situations where it should be workable even if [.'. x] includes 0 without the algorithm being deemed broken because there's no "if x != 0 then 1/x else ???" in it.
I'd like to understand why we can't do the same trick we do with sqrt(-1) on (1/0) and call it "zeplex". Example:
1/0 = Ê' (some applicable symbol)
A zeplex number is composed of a real part and a zereal part: a + bÊ'
Then:
Ê'/Ê' = 1
0*Ê' = 0
And so on.
It can't be just the asymptotic nature, because it doesn't seem to hold complex from being a valid concept. I.e.: http://www.wolframalpha.com/in...
What about when the doctor himself prescribes the antibiotics for a cold or flu against the patient's own judgement, without doing any test for bacterial infection?
Found this procedure: http://www.kime.net/directcc/d...
You could link the oldest one to the less old through their COM ports.
It may require access to Win 3.11 install disks tho.
This.
Next up: Why not just do this using batteries--never mind the cars?
Because they were bound to be plugged in to recharge anyway. That way they're doubling as batteries for the building.
I present you... Non-US keyboards!
They do annoy the heck of me tho.
An electrical heater is not a system, it's just part of one. The system itself would at least involve the energy source and the transporting medium, where the losses continue to hold true the fact that there's no 100% efficiency in any system. If there were, Entropy would have no meaning.
If you take the isolated case of the heater as being 100% efficient because in itself it's able to convert 100% of its input energy into wanted heat (which itself is discutable, since there may still be losses through electro-magnetic emissions, vibrations, etc. that would not be captured by the room and transformed into heat, even though all that would be as negligible as contesting gravity acceleration as not being 9.8m/s^2 in most cases), you'd just as well pick a heat pump which, with the same amount of input energy, "produces" 3 times more heat.
Heat pumps are 300% efficient. Maybe we should use heat pumps instead of electric cars.
What I meant is that the fact seems to be "electricity is way more efficient than combustion" rather than "electricity is 100% efficient. Gas is not".
As far as my ignorance in the laws of Physics goes, it's simply impossible to have any system running at 100% efficiency because it automatically implies zero loss of energy.
Electric systems lose energy everywhere: conduction materials have impedance, motors have friction *and* generate inductive impedance, photons are created...
I think you may have gotten your fact wrong.