Slashdot Mirror


Ice Tea Company Rebrands as 'Long Blockchain' and Stock Price Triples (arstechnica.com)

The Long Island Ice Tea Corporation is exactly what it sounds like: a company that sells people bottled iced tea and lemonade. But today the company announced a significant change of strategy that would start with changing its name to "Long Blockchain Corporation." From a report: The company was "shifting its primary corporate focus towards the exploration of and investment in opportunities that leverage the benefits of blockchain technology," the company said in a Thursday morning press release. "Emerging blockchain technologies are creating a fundamental paradigm shift across the global marketplace," the company said. The stock market loved the announcement. Trading opened Thursday morning more than 200 percent higher than Wednesday night's closing price. The company isn't getting out of the iced tea business. "The Company will continue to operate Long Island Brand Beverages, LLC as a wholly-owned subsidiary," the company writes in its press release. The new blockchain efforts are only in their "preliminary stages," the press release says, and will likely involve investing or forming partnerships with other companies. One potential partner is providing "blockchain infrastructure for the financial services industry." Another is building a "new smart contract platform for building decentralized applications."

144 comments

  1. Fools and Money. by Zorro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Soon to be separated.

    1. Re:Fools and Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It makes sense, really. Anyone that is willing to invest money in crypto is probably willing to throw it away on this stock too.

    2. Re:Fools and Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Their tea is now fully buzzword synergized and cloud-compliant.

    3. Re:Fools and Money. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Soon to be separated.

      It's all a gamble at this point. They're fools if they think a company will continue to grow just because they have blockchain in their name. They're not fools if they think other fools will think that and get in early to take the money from the fools.

      If they're investing to feed off the other fools, they're gamblers, not necessarily fools.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re: Fools and Money. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sort of. The underlying premise behind blockchain is a good idea, but Bitcoin will never work for its intended purpose, and so it will probably crash really hard. In fact this may even trigger the next recession just like the dot-com bubble did. Probably won't happen for a year or two, but it will happen.

      We can call this the bitcoin bubble, even though many other popular ones (ethereum, bch) have the same problems. But like the dot-com bubble before it, the premise isn't bad, it's just people are creating these business models that won't ever go anywhere. Once the hype dies off, we'll begin seeing more stability, and a rise in currencies that aren't dependent upon miners and have low/no transaction fees.

      In my opinion, keep an eye on decred and/or IOTA, or currencies like them, as the model they use makes them viable as a currency rather than as a mere financial instrument backed by nothing.

    5. Re:Fools and Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 6 year old running a lemonade stand in their front yard has more business sense than the people running this company.

    6. Re:Fools and Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just bought a domain and going to set up a site. It's a bubble, boys, get in while you can!

    7. Re:Fools and Money. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because of this obvious opportunity, for the next several months I will be referred to as "Bruce Blockchain Blockchain Blockchain Millionare Billionare Perens"

    8. Re: Fools and Money. by brantondaveperson · · Score: 0

      and a rise in currencies that aren't dependent upon miners and have low/no transaction fees.

      You mean like all the current, existing currencies?

    9. Re:Fools and Money. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I was going for Blockchain McBlockface

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    10. Re:Fools and Money. by kriston · · Score: 1

      It kind of reminds me of the later years of Zapata Oil company.

      --

      Kriston

    11. Re: Fools and Money. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      A lot of people may know that but are still willing to take the risk.

      As you say, the crash may not be for another year or two. I'm still not sure I want to put a dime into Bitcoin (certainly none that I can't afford to lose), but even knowing that it's almost certainly going to crash, if you time it right you can still do well. If you buy now and sell in 6 months at 50% profit it doesn't matter if it crashes in a year to almost nothing.

      At this point I think it's probably a better strategy though to watch for brand new cryptocurrencies being introduced that trade at fractions of a penny each. Throw $5 into it and see where it goes. Something that low has the potential to hyper-inflate quickly with all the buzz and if it does you can cash out with some decent money. And if it doesn't - well, you lost $5. The odds are a hell of a lot better than the lottery.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    12. Re: Fools and Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Ian Dury was still alive he'd want to rename his band the Blockchains for an immediate tripling of record sales.

    13. Re: Fools and Money. by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      In fact this may even trigger the next recession just like the dot-com bubble did. Probably won't happen for a year or two, but it will happen.

      So you're saying that I should get in now?

    14. Re: Fools and Money. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      If Ian Dury was still alive he'd want to rename his band the Blockchains for an immediate tripling of record sales.

      And retitle his song "Sex and Drugs and Rock and Roll and Cryptocurrency". Hm. That doesn't quite scan...

    15. Re: Fools and Money. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Cash, dollars, hmm, carry it in your pocket, spend it anonymously, wow what a novel concept. You don't need a computer, you don't need the internet, spend it any time, any where, all without permission, you don't have to ask permission from any one to buy anything when you pay with cash. No one can electronically hack into you wallet and steal it or even just delete it. Here is a scam for crypto currency types, don't try to steal them, just delete them, mwa hah hah, there less there are, the more yours are worth, the more you delete, the richer you are. You bet they are doing more to defend against hacking but how about deletion, split second and they are gone for ever. Interesting thought, all crypto currency by the nature of chaos theory will diminish to zero over time, you can not replace what has been deleted. You can bet those places will be hacked not to steal those files that represent imaginary money but to delete them, supply and demand, the more you get rid of, the more the rest are worth, good luck with that. What would the crime be, computer hacking and hmm, vandalism, no theft involved.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re: Fools and Money. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      You mean like all the current, existing currencies?

      Try having instant digital transactions with existing currencies. Either you pay a lot (upwards of 3% in the case of credit cards,) or the transaction happens slowly.

    17. Re: Fools and Money. by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      For international inter-currency transactions this is true. For transactions within currencies, I can do that to your bank account using my phone, zero fees, and it happens straight away. I think in the US the banks appear to have everyone over a barrel, which may well explain the interest in bitcoin (maybe).

    18. Re:Fools and Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      @#%$%$% will people PLEASE stop referring to 'crypto'currencies (which don't use any real cryptography, but rather just time/energy-wasting hash collision calculations) as 'crypto'?

      'crypto' has, for literally DECADES, been a shorthand for cryptography and/or cryptanalysis. $foocoin is NOT 'crypto'.
      Stop it.

    19. Re:Fools and Money. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Because of this obvious opportunity, for the next several months I will be referred to as "Bruce Blockchain Blockchain Blockchain Millionare Billionare Perens"

      Just stick to "Bruce Blockchain" it sounds sort of super-heroey.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re: Fools and Money. by fox171171 · · Score: 1

      Alice in Blockchains

    21. Re:Fools and Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first baby named as Bruce Blockchain will get marriage proposals right after the naming ceremony is completed. A guaranteed billion dollar baby is nothing to sneeze at.

  2. New investment opportunity by nwaack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi all, I'm starting a new company called Super-awesome-blockchain-bitcoin-make-you-money-LLC. I'm still in the "preliminary stages" of setting up said company but it's gonna be awesome. You can send all your money to me at my P.O. Box. ~SMH

    1. Re:New investment opportunity by Mr307 · · Score: 0

      Dont be a fool my new Super-duper-awesome-blockchain-bitcoin-make-you-money-LLC, is clearly better because look the name is longer and we'll promise you more awesomeness. Send all money now, dont fall behind the extra duper awesomeness or you will lose out.

       

    2. Re:New investment opportunity by Jose · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm at the post office, and they are saying that they need a zip code for PO Box ~SMH.

      please provide the *full* address so we can make the monies!

      --
      The basic sleazeware produced in a drunken fury by a bunch of UCBerkeley grad students was still the core of BIND. --PV
    3. Re:New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly the same thing happened in the 90's when Linux took off during the Dotcom Bubble 1.0. Companies were changing their name to dumb shit like "Linux Mining Company" and they added massive amounts of value to their stocks overnight. IIRC I was on slashdot then too, and people here were all-in on pumping and dumping just like they are again now with bitcoin.

    4. Re:New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi all, I'm starting a new company called Super-awesome-blockchain-bitcoin-make-you-money-LLC. I'm still in the "preliminary stages" of setting up said company but it's gonna be awesome. You can send all your money to me at my P.O. Box. ~SMH

      You forgot to say you lived in Nigeria.

    5. Re:New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wake me up when I can buy MUSKoin
      I imagine a lot of you just started humping your couch at the thought of it

    6. Re: New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not my couch, I am humping your mom

    7. Re:New investment opportunity by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

      i'll one-up you. i've legally changed my name to "blockchain supermcawesome". i'm getting job offers left and right via linkedin.

    8. Re:New investment opportunity by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the difference is that you know how this scam works now and should be the one pumping and dumping...not the one complaining about the pumpers and dumpers.

    9. Re:New investment opportunity by nnet · · Score: 1

      sorry I couldn't find either of your companies on NYSE. no soup for you.

    10. Re:New investment opportunity by nnet · · Score: 2

      no thats just me making you think you're valuable. I'm pumping up your stock in prep for a dump.

    11. Re:New investment opportunity by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      That's.. not really what I do... Perhaps you're thinking of backpage.com?

    12. Re:New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in! Take my money!

    13. Re: New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humping is funny.

    14. Re:New investment opportunity by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I will hereby be referred to as "Blockchain McBlockhead"

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    15. Re: New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next year will be the year of the block chain desktop!

    16. Re:New investment opportunity by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      sorry I couldn't find either of your companies on NYSE. no soup for you.

      That is because they are in stealth mode!

    17. Re:New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because I am not a greedy piece of shit like yourself.

    18. Re:New investment opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cmon the obvious name is "Machine Learning Blockchain AI"

  3. This is good for bitcoin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The stupid and their money are easily parted.

  4. Artificial Intelligence Poetry by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Emerging blockchain technologies are creating a fundamental paradigm shift across the global marketplace,"

    The jargon is strong with this one.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by FFOMelchior · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know. Could use more synergy.

    2. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, he left out, "data-driven" and "cloud".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Emerging blockchain technologies are creating a fundamental paradigm shift across the global marketplace,"

      The jargon is strong with this one.

      BINGO!!!!

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    4. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention it tells you absolutely nothing about what they plan on leveraging or disrupting.

    5. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by dcrisp · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Could use more synergy.

      What DOES synergy taste like?

    6. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

      Tastes like success!

    7. Re: Artificial Intelligence Poetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blockchain-Integrated eNdogenous Growth Organization?

    8. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Pffft Synergy is soo last year, as is clouds. We're all about breaking down siloed thinking and leveraging fog computing to help move the dial on our market share.

    9. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Oh, my god. "Siloed thinking" really is a thing. I refuse to google "fog computing" until I've had a few cocktails.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicken

    11. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by Gryle · · Score: 1
      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    12. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Yeah that spread throughout my company last year. Silos was all the rage.
      Fog computing I heard during a Cisco presentation, basically network edge pre-work on data before it gets to the cloud. I threw up a little in my mouth when I heard that one.
      "Moving the dial" is new to me, I heard that one barely a month ago

    13. Re:Artificial Intelligence Poetry by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      And cowbell.

  5. Blockchain will revolutionize Ice Tea by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    A QR code on the container will tell you the source of every tea bag used to create your drink, and also tell you who was tea bagged buying the company's stock.

    1. Re:Blockchain will revolutionize Ice Tea by hey! · · Score: 1

      And what's more nobody will be able to edit that information, only add to it.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Blockchain will revolutionize Ice Tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am all for putting state secrets & and child porn on the block chain, encrypted. Then publish the passphrase key after the Blockchain irrevocably confirms the block. I’ll lol.

    3. Re:Blockchain will revolutionize Ice Tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess people don’t realize this is a way irrevocably publishing anything. Encrypt the fappening to the blockchain and then the key to it it far after there is any chance of unpublishing it. What a naughty idea!

    4. Re:Blockchain will revolutionize Ice Tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you joke but consumer supply chain validation is one of the best (if not only) uses of blockchains.

    5. Re:Blockchain will revolutionize Ice Tea by hey! · · Score: 2

      Frankly I would be astonished if a majority of the people promoting or knowingly investing in "block chain technology" has any idea how it works.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Blockchain will revolutionize Ice Tea by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      As evidenced by this ridiculous event, no.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  6. Quoting Greenspan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    " But how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions as they have in Japan over the past decade?" Waiit, this was about bitco^hblockchain, so no need to fear prolonged contractions caused by inappropriate government-private sector collusion, corruption or politically and ideologically motivated economic policies run through the central banks.

  7. Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company that can make tea is best situated to make use of blockchain technology.

    1. Re:Clearly by glitch! · · Score: 2

      A company that can make tea is best situated to make use of blockchain technology.

      Clearly they are ahead of the beverage serving computer in HGTTG. "Share and enjoy!"

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
  8. Ah, the "Serial Entepreneur"... by ErichTheRed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone who's done any work for typical small-to-medium businesses owned and dominated by one person could see this coming a mile away. When I was starting out I worked for a couple of MSPs that were quite obviously pet projects for the owner. People like this will chase after anything that looks like they can squeeze a few bucks out before the bubble pops. It's just a personality trait -- they're hard-wired to chase money and will bounce from thing to thing picking up the crumbs, and seem naturally attracted to scammy business models.

    A perfect example where I live is solar panels. There are dozens of fly-by-night companies who've set up shop alongside the big boys like Harvest Power and SolarCity. Every single one is just trying to sell sell sell enough people on overpriced equipment and service until the tax credits get repealed. When that happens, oops, business goes bankrupt and they move on. Federal tax credit on solar is 30% on equipment and installation, so every single one of these companies is marking the price of systems up by at least a few percent beyond that, and are directly taking advantage of the fact that most people are too dumb to understand how their taxes are computed. They just see "OMG huge tax credit" and sign up...and people like this Long Blockchain guy get to live large another day.

    1. Re:Ah, the "Serial Entepreneur"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar panel installation is perhaps not a good example. My understanding is that typically the smaller solar installation businesses are cheaper than the large ones. (No citation because the parent did not give one.) That said, like any local business--particularly when making a large purchase--one should establish the businesses' local reputation.

      And yes, I did just purchase solar panels from a local installer and have been extremely happy with the way the install went. They were willing to work with us in ways that a large business never would have; e.g., allowing us to help with the install for a discount. (I am an engineer and know the engineer that runs the business.)

    2. Re:Ah, the "Serial Entepreneur"... by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      When I first read your post I thought Kellog's was getting into the blockchain game. I can see the prospectus - a drawing of Tony the Tiger holding a cinder block and gold chain with a bright red "They're Grrreat!" emblazoned across the page.

    3. Re: Ah, the "Serial Entepreneur"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone justifying their recent decision to themself.

  9. Yeah, it's 1999 again by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just substitute "blockchain" for "dot com."

    1. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      The difference is that if bitcoin crashes tomorrow it won't cause a worldwide recession.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, have you considered that scenario with half the masses counting on their bitcoin portfolio to pay their rent?

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    3. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As more derivatives are based upon bitcoin with their multiplier effect, this will change very soon.

    4. Re: Yeah, it's 1999 again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Half the masses' is a hell of a stretch.

    5. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, have you considered that scenario with half the masses counting on their bitcoin portfolio to pay their rent?

      We're nowhere near that yet. In the West I'd be surprised if more than 1% of people owned any bitcoin.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by magzteel · · Score: 1

      The difference is that if bitcoin crashes tomorrow it won't cause a worldwide recession.

      Are you sure about that?

    7. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by leonbev · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. I've heard stories of people maxing out their credit cards to buy more Bitcoin with the illusion/delusion that they're going to get 500% returns on their money, so it's probably going to have at least some ripple effect to the rest of the economy.

    8. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      The difference is that if bitcoin crashes tomorrow it won't cause a worldwide recession.

      Are you sure about that?

      According to BBC this morning, the high estimate for ownership of bitcoin is 3 million people- so at most 0.04% of the world's population own bitcoin. That's not excluding all the many people who have owned bitcoin and lost the key.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      You're probably a couple of orders of magnitude too high in that estimate, if not more.

    10. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Honestly? not much more than the baseline of gambling addicts that do the same chasing "Getting back to even"...

      Insolvency is a way of life for a huge swath of the American public, and while I don't know the laws in other countries, I expect anyone who's double (or $DIETY help them triple) leveraged on BTC to be in a country with similar insolvency laws. Anyone who would face a lifetime debt crush if they failed to time the bubble likely is not extended that way into BTC.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      www.domain.blockchain

      There's your new TLD = .blockchain

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re: Yeah, it's 1999 again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, yes. But bitcoin hasn't crashed yet. there's time for it to get worse.

    13. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by magzteel · · Score: 1

      The difference is that if bitcoin crashes tomorrow it won't cause a worldwide recession.

      Are you sure about that?

      According to BBC this morning, the high estimate for ownership of bitcoin is 3 million people- so at most 0.04% of the world's population own bitcoin. That's not excluding all the many people who have owned bitcoin and lost the key.

      The press is reporting that people are using home equity and credit cards to buy in. When it caves it could have a ripple effect in other markets.

    14. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, have you considered that scenario with half the masses counting on their bitcoin portfolio to pay their rent?

      I love that you think "the masses" have a portfolio of anything, never mind bitcoin.

      "Jeeves, please pass me my morning's portfolio listing for perusal before I head off for my shift serving at McDonalds."

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. I've heard stories of people maxing out their credit cards to buy more Bitcoin with the illusion/delusion that they're going to get 500% returns on their money, so it's probably going to have at least some ripple effect to the rest of the economy.

      Those sort of people are basically gambling addicts, and would be wasting their kids' present money betting on snow at Christmas or something if bitcoin didn't exist. Although tragic individually, it wouldn't amount to much in the wider scheme of things.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      My bad, I probably misunderstood the noble goal of replacing state owned currencies with people owned cryptocurrencies as something that was actually looked forward to.

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    17. Re:Yeah, it's 1999 again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1BTC == 1BTC

      Captcha: Infects

  10. Every Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is the third story I've seen of companies doing this. It hasn't failed to make me laugh.

    This one is the best so far.

  11. take my money... by arsenix · · Score: 1

    Their website is comedic gold:
    "The Company is already in the preliminary stages of evaluating specific opportunities involving blockchain technology."

    Really weaving a solid story on commercial traction and commitment there...

    --
    (this is offended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  12. Quoting Mencken by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby"

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Quoting Mencken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's an actual first for Hillary!, isn't it?

      Nope! Either way you think about it, it was the electoral college, which is a stopgap between the will of the people, that turned the goose.

      Now let's go dig up Madison's Bones.

    2. Re:Quoting Mencken by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Or as it says in Proverbs (King James version): "There is treasure to be desired and oil in the dwelling of the wise; but a foolish man spendeth it up." Suckers have been around for millenia.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  13. Crook... by adosch · · Score: 2

    ...ed.

    Ah who am I kidding? I have a slight moral compass and quite lazy when it comes to making a quick tech buck in entrepreneurial buzzword gold still after all these years. Hope it works out for them.............

    Wonder if their ice tea is any good?

  14. The scary thing is... by Nutria · · Score: 1

    this seems to be a legitimate news story.

    https://investors.longislandicedtea.com/
    Long Blockchain Corp. Withdraws S-1 Registration Statement
    December 21, 2017

    Farmingdale, NY (December 21, 2017) â" Long Blockchain Corp. (NasdaqCM: LTEA) (the âoeCompanyâ) today announced that it has withdrawn its previously filed S-1 registration statement relating to a proposed underwritten public offering, which was filed on November 11, 2017. Earlier this morning, the Company announced that it has approved changing its name from âoeLong Island Iced Tea Corp.â to âoeLong Blockchain Corp.â and is shifting its primary corporate focus towards the exploration of and investment in opportunities that leverage the benefits of blockchain technology.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:The scary thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else picturing a middle-aged balding guy in an expensive suit and gold chains, asking his nephew "Hey, how can I get some of that bitcoin money?"

  15. Not so new by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There used to be a railroad in the eastern US called the Seaboard Air Line Railroad, "air line" being a railroad term for "as the crow flies". Its stock price had a tendency to follow airline stocks.

    1. Re:Not so new by Higaran · · Score: 1

      Wow I haven't heard that name in years, and I work in the rail industry.

  16. No big deal, really by demon+driver · · Score: 4, Funny

    After all, it was just a very small transition from 'beverage' to 'leverage'.

    1. Re:No big deal, really by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Funny how a typo in a leaked internal memo can change things.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:No big deal, really by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      Clever post, would mod up if I hadn't already posted to the thread.

    3. Re:No big deal, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider it done. :)

  17. I Heard You Like Blockchain, Inc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now we put a blockchain inside of another blockchain. That will cause an exponential growth of both the blockchain and the money inside, resulting in infinite returns for investors.

  18. Yep that's how to sink a company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, I feel so bad for all of the people they employed.

    only a fucking retard would do something like this. does Trump own/run this company?

    hey, I know we make wine, but let's get into car manufacturing, I know we know absolutely nothing about this, but trust me this will be a hugely great thing to do. we have nobody working for us skilled in this new venture, but what we're going to do is fire all of you and invest in a new direction. the really great thing about this is you won't have to pay taxes on your income anymore. Merry Christmas, we hope you have as wonderful of a Christmas as we will.

    This company will be in the ground before the end of January 2018

  19. Ripple by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    One potential partner is providing "blockchain infrastructure for the financial services industry."

    So... Ripple?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  20. Re:BREAKING NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can only wish.

  21. BINGO! by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    I think that hit all my buzzwords.

    1. Re:BINGO! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Damnit!
      I was one off but "synergistic leverage" was in the way...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  22. Reminds me of Snap Interactive isn't Snap Inc. by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Recently I read that only 15% of Americans actually own stocks. It would appear that maybe some of those 15% don't really know what they are doing. Earlier this year before Snap Inc. (parent company of Snapchat and other programs) did its IPO, an unrelated company named Snap Interactive suddenly started having a lot more interest in its stock because people thought it was the parent company of Snapchat. Snap Interactive didn't even do anything to deceive anybody. People just wrong assumed they owned Snapchat. What's sad is that they could do just a small amount of research via searches on Google, Bing, etc. and determine that Snap Interactive wasn't the owner of Snapchat, but heck, it's just easier to buy stock on speculation rather than check stuff so let's do that.

    1. Re:Reminds me of Snap Interactive isn't Snap Inc. by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Are these maybe stock-trading bots?

    2. Re:Reminds me of Snap Interactive isn't Snap Inc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe it. Everyone with a 401(k) owns stocks, whether they know it or not.

    3. Re:Reminds me of Snap Interactive isn't Snap Inc. by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Informative

      15% own stocks DIRECTLY. Much much larger percentages of the public have mutual fund holdings, often in IRAs or 401ks.

      That 15% number is talking point for people with a political agenda, and has little relationship with reality.

      Note I am not saying the 401K and IRA schemes are models of good public policy just that its not true only 15% of Americans 'own' stocks.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:Reminds me of Snap Interactive isn't Snap Inc. by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Its real people are that stupid. Check out sites like Investor Hub or Investor Hangout and watch the comedy show when some company make some pump statement. Perfect example is QMKR ticker. If you see this companies history it is nothing but a shell. Now watch their stock price go up a few days ago as they made an announcement about entering the Cryptocurrency Industry. Magic...

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    5. Re:Reminds me of Snap Interactive isn't Snap Inc. by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Here in the UK anyone with a pension or life assurance or whatever "owns stocks and shares" since the provider has to have their money invested somewhere.

      It is a meaningless statement though. I can't go to my pension company and say "can you please move GBP10,000 of my pension fund into this great new Blockchain company I've heard about."

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Reminds me of Snap Interactive isn't Snap Inc. by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Here in the US though to some degree you could do that. Most people get a menu of investment vehicles to choose from in 401k programs offered by employers. You can't say put 10k in Blockchain Inc, but you can say put 5% in GoldmanSucks High-tech fund. Which you can discover the makeup of, if you ask.

      Usually there will be 10 or 20 other funds to allocate to, like bond funds, municipal bond funds, real-estate holdings, domestic equity, foreign capital, than stuff by size, blue chips, growth, small cap, and finally some target date offerings. So you have some influence. You can also roll a 401k into an IRA; if you don't like the investment vehicles your company offers.

      If you are doing an IRA (individual retirement account) you can put just about any investment you want in it so long as its managed on your behalf by a licenses securities broker. You can invest in precious metals, individual stocks, individual bonds, mutual funds, index funds, even a simple Certificate of Deposit at a bank. So you certainly can put your tax deferred retirement savings into 'Long Blockchain' here in the states if that is what you want to do.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  23. Link in story is broken by LordKronos · · Score: 2

    I clicked the link in the story intending to read the article, but somehow ended up on Ars Technica instead of The Onion. Come on, slashdot...get some actual editors already and make sure your damn links work.

  24. Angel Investor Wanted! by slacktide · · Score: 3, Informative

    You won't want to miss getting in on the ground floor of the Dirty South House of Chicken, Waffles, and Blockchain.

    1. Re:Angel Investor Wanted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anonymously because I had to mod this up, but that's the first laugh I've had today.

  25. blocked chain? use a plunger! by petes_PoV · · Score: 2

    Trading opened Thursday morning more than 200 percent higher

    Unfortunately all the trades were done in BTC!

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  26. It's a computer folks by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    that's what's making these silly decisions. Although part of me things this should be a canary in the coal mine for our economic system.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  27. I'm guessing.... by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    There is an army of bots scouring for anything "____coin" or "blockchain" and buying according the a predefined ruleset. They are probly set to dump it all once it begins a downward trend over a couple days.

    The robot army is already in control.

    At this point, I'm certain these guys are making out like bandits, but once that first dump trigger is hit, its gonna be a bloodbath.

    More than one way to cash in on this crazy-train.

    Disclosure: I don't gamble.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  28. Same old by AlanObject · · Score: 1

    Back in the early '00 decade were were seriously advised by investment bankers to add a "dot com" to our name before doing our public offering. We were actually a networking products company enjoying a ride up on the dot com boom but the bankers thought in order for the stock to "take off" it had to be associated with this new thing called the web. (this was in the year 200x!)

    At the end of the day we didn't do it but they were serious.

  29. does anybody remember "heyidiot.com" by magzteel · · Score: 1

    It was a joke web site Larry Ellison put out during the dotcom boom. They had a new company called "heyidiot.com" who's only product was their stock, which could only go up forever.

    1. Re:does anybody remember "heyidiot.com" by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      It was a joke web site Larry Ellison put out during the dotcom boom. They had a new company called "heyidiot.com" who's only product was their stock, which could only go up forever.

      They later renamed that to "oracle.com".

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  30. Re: DIY Cryptocurrency Mining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer affiliate spam. Please mod down. Also report his affiliate ID to Amazon for spamming. They will ban him if enough of us do it. Please help the cause. Report Creimer today for spamming, as this is what it is, blatant spam. Every slashdot story, same link and post == spam.

  31. There's one born every minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone want to invest in my crypt ochre/rent-sea chain block company? We deal in red and yellow pigments for graves and beachfront rental properties arranged in conjoined strips.

  32. To quote a recent intelligent company: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you pop once you pop
    Once you pop THAT'S GREAT

  33. Same old story by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A company for carrying on an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is. and the result of this announcement, described in this paragraph:

    [the prospectus stated] that the required capital was half a million, in five thousand shares of 100 pounds each, deposit 2 pounds per share. Each subscriber, paying his [or her] desposit, was entitled to 100 pounds per annum per share. How this immense profit was to be obtained, [the proposer] did not condescend to inform [the buyers] at that time, but promised that in a month full particulars should be duly announced, and a call made for the remaining 98 pounds of the subscription. Next morning, at nine o'clock, this great man opened an office in Cornhill. Crowds of people beset his door, and when he shut up at three o'cock, he found that no less than one thousand shares had been subscribed for, and the deposits paid. He was thus, in five hours, the winner of 2000 pounds. He was philosophical enough to be contented with his venture, and set off the same evening for the Continent. He was never heard of again. (Mackay 55-56)

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  34. Next up: Company rebrands as "Bubble Tea"... by ffkom · · Score: 1

    ... to celebrate the burst of the Blockchain bubble.

  35. Where my BS bingo card? by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    Just reading the summary filled my BS bingo card!

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  36. WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are really stupid, but it makes me want to buy there drink just as an aside I am starting to explore the of the blockchain potential of AC posting anyone that want's to throw money at me can contact me right here if the have the computing power to mine my post

  37. Where's the foot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey editors, I think you forgot to attach the Monty Python foot icon to this article.

  38. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  39. And yet, that money is MADE ... UP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not *earned* . Aka: Not in exchange for having worked for it.

    But somebody gets to tell you to *acually work* more to earn more of his money, because somebody *believed* that a company is worth more. No chance that that is bullshit. No chance he just did changed his view to get more free work from us. Nu-uh. Just good honest capitalism, the foundation of our society ... of moronic livestock being milked for work by selfish psychos who never worked a day in their lives, except to tell you to work, and to avoid actual work. Telling you you are a selfish moocher if you want the same.

    Resellers, corporate owners, the media industry, banking & stocks, ⦠they all are merely just elaborate mooching thieves who came to power with what they stole from you and me.

    1. Re:And yet, that money is MADE ... UP. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      work by selfish psychos who never worked a day in their lives

      You'd be surprised how many fortune 500 CEOs started out doing menial work that most people would never do. I remember hearing about one who started out as a garbage man (ironically, because of the stigma attached to the job title, garbage men tend to make a decent living.) John Legere, one of the highest paid CEOs in the world, went through a few low skilled jobs.

  40. Could it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jabberwocky!

  41. Is this a joke? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I really can't tell.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  42. Long Island Tea with no alcohol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder they changed the name - that was false and deceptive advertising!