Help me remember here. How long has it been that the Republicans have been holding primaries with something approaching two dozen candidates? It seems like a relatively recent phenomenon, like in the last three elections or so.
How sad is your world view when you think see two people do something entirely natural and REQUIRED FOR THE SURVIVAL OF OUR SPECIES and it offends you.
I thought about the loudspeaker option, too. However, I'm worried that anyone stupid enough to fly a drone that interferes with firefighters would also be too self-centered to cooperate. Maybe they authorities would need to include the threat "or we will destroy your drone now".
My reaction is mainly because of some of the horrible hyperbole that I have seen in summaries by bad journalists. Things like "artificial life created!" Then it turns out to be a computer simulation of some kind of goat-monkey hybrid, or whatever. I cringe at myself for taking the bait, whenever I read stuff like that.
Like many interested readers, I depend on good science journalists so I can understand discoveries that are outside my field. I enjoy reading well-written articles.
Dice seems to be rolling out the beta site with all its crap and and its de-emphasis on user-provided content, but under the guise of the classic site.
Slashdot Mirror
I believe you would be using it incorrectly.
Then there's this guy. I don't know him, but he's my hero.
"The Owner Of California's Botto Bistro Is Proud To Have Yelp's Worst-Rated Restaurant"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
The FSF seems to be taking this seriously.
Infectious diseases on public phones wiped out the Golgafrincians in Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
We also know that diseases mutate and evolve.
Apparently, public phone diseases have evolved from public phones to cell phones, and also from a fictional story to the real world.
Crap. Now I'm seriously getting wistful. If only we could fix that one.
Help me remember here. How long has it been that the Republicans have been holding primaries with something approaching two dozen candidates? It seems like a relatively recent phenomenon, like in the last three elections or so.
Seconded.
You mean "two girls one cup"?
That would be an interesting counterpoint to the Nobel Peace Prize given to Obama, which was apparently squandered.
"It's almost like someone with billions of dollars has been trying to smear the leading Democratic candidate for a few years now."
That Bill! He's quite the prankster.
I thought about the loudspeaker option, too. However, I'm worried that anyone stupid enough to fly a drone that interferes with firefighters would also be too self-centered to cooperate. Maybe they authorities would need to include the threat "or we will destroy your drone now".
Yeah, I thought about the TSA, also.
Jarik FTW!
They need a nonlethal solution. Bullets, or even shotgun pellets, would have to fall somewhere eventually.
Obligatory example:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...
Wow, there it is. I had looked all over for it, but just could not see it until you pointed it out. Thanks.
They could have linked the word "transcript" in the summary to the transcript, but no.
Link to the transcript?
Yeah, I'm only being sarcastic.
My reaction is mainly because of some of the horrible hyperbole that I have seen in summaries by bad journalists. Things like "artificial life created!" Then it turns out to be a computer simulation of some kind of goat-monkey hybrid, or whatever. I cringe at myself for taking the bait, whenever I read stuff like that.
Like many interested readers, I depend on good science journalists so I can understand discoveries that are outside my field. I enjoy reading well-written articles.
Hah, hah, hah, hah, hah, hah, hah, hah, hah!
No.
Nice and clean. Thanks.
I'd mod you up, if I still had points.
Yeah! Fuck classic!
It's a small world after all!
"The only mistake is that people found out about it."
THAT is the "seconds to destroy" part, that the parent referred to.