Slashdot Mirror


User: tombeard

tombeard's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
459
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 459

  1. Re:Careful what you wish for on Contents of Leaked HBGary Emails Reveal Wrongdoing · · Score: 1

    /republican/CEO/

  2. Re:Careful what you wish for on Contents of Leaked HBGary Emails Reveal Wrongdoing · · Score: 1

    And that the republican will give him another cookie.

  3. Re:Careful what you wish for on Contents of Leaked HBGary Emails Reveal Wrongdoing · · Score: 1

    Re. The Probability Broach , why not just let people sign up for anyone they want to represent them, and change their mind up until the final vote is cast?

  4. Re:Careful what you wish for on Contents of Leaked HBGary Emails Reveal Wrongdoing · · Score: 1

    Another problem is the number of states. When there were 13 getting or failing to get 2/3 of the state legislatures to agree on something was doable. With 50 there is essentially no chance of getting an amendment via state referendum. We need to combine our states into 14-20 super-states, who can internally decide how to represent their citizens to the federal government.

  5. Re:Careful what you wish for on Contents of Leaked HBGary Emails Reveal Wrongdoing · · Score: 1

    And in any event, they are free to subpoena the other end of the email conversation.

  6. OK, I just updated Ubuntu on Ubuntu: Where Did the Love Go? · · Score: 1

    Now double click doesn't work for selecting things or opening them. I can right click for selections, then pick open. #@$%$. It was working just fine before, but some stupid SOB decided he could change my defaults to something he considered "better". Yea, been here before, so I know that I can eventually dig down into some obscure menu and put it back as it was, but why the fuck should I have to. I don't go around changing other peoples computer setting, why does the Ubuntu team feel they have that privilege. Fuckum, I'll go Gentoo. Well, maybe Cent.

  7. Re:what? on Ubuntu: Where Did the Love Go? · · Score: 1

    So why did they switch them without my asking?

  8. Re:No Facebook == disqualified? on Lawyers Using Facebook Research For Jury Selection · · Score: 1

    Would you allow the state to punish someone in your name if you felt he didn't deserve punishment, or is violating a law always grounds to punish? Consider that some day it might be you in the defendants chair.

  9. They will do this on Slashdot too. on Air Force Wants Hundreds of Fake Online Identities · · Score: 1

    So put on your nerd hats and figure out a way to detect these personae.

  10. Re:Head in the sand syndrome on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    We are working on that wall in the south. Give us time.

  11. Re:NATO? on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to believe that slashdot has not published anything that is tombeard classified.
    What is the possibility that redit reposts do not contain tombeard-classified information?

  12. Re:get it on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    And by what basis can we assert that our laws apply to anyone other then out citizens? I have heard the assertion, but not the basis.

  13. Re:Didn't the US just publish a similar list recen on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    My kingdom for a mod (up) point!

  14. Re:US law to apply to foreign citizens? on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    So, assault and fraud (of various degree) would be the only recognized crime?. How could we possibly run the world on such a moral system? We would have to dig up Lysander Spooner and make him king. He would, of course, decline the office.

  15. Re:Good luck with this. on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    I doubt they would end up trying him. Just like the gitmo captive that died last week, with legal indefinite detention and government sanctioned torture why go to the expense and potential embarrassment?

  16. Re:Backronym abuse on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    Their best idea was succession. You know how the US government dealt with that.

  17. Re:clarification on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    Oops. Thought I was replying to mug funky. What I said, up one.

  18. Re:clarification on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    Should you?

  19. Re:How about on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    So it is acceptable to act immorally? Is slavery freedom? Are lies truth? We could power the world with an Orwell generator!

  20. Re:How about on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    Freedom is not synonymous with safety. In fact, freedom is risky, dangerous, and essential.

  21. Re:Constitutional? I doubt it. on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    Since the Kennedy assassination, every US President knows what happens if he opposes the CIA war machine.

  22. Re:Constitutional? I doubt it. on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    We have not been at war since 1945. Anything excused as a "war power" since then is completely bogus.

  23. Re:No on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    Wikileaks could publish the key to the insurance file before the bill was signed into law. Do you think that is what they want?

  24. Re:Can this be applied retroactively? on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 1

    I think you mean 12 April 1861.

  25. Re:Libby and Cheiney on Lawmaker Reintroduces WikiLeaks Prosecution Bill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I'm sure after as much "time for reflection" necessary has been allowed, Bradley will certainly remember whatever is required for his conviction.