How you describe Obama fanatics (and equate that minority to all supporters or 'liberals/progressives') demonstrates just how bigoted and shallow your view of people is. Of course I will attack you if your blathering resembles blatant ignorance and intolerance.
Did you get a boner over Bush being a 'strong leader' while missing all his big muckups? Better yet, how great was it to watch John McCain sell his soul and backbone for GOP support and flip flop about 100x more than Kerry ever did?
But I"m not saying all conservatives are that naive... I'm not santa clause nor would I ever try to generalize such a large group of people so hastily and recklessly.
The great thing about publicly expressed opinion is that despite how little you care about how your message is received, other people DO care about how you deliver and what you've got to say. Subsequently you'll only be less and less credited as you show how foolish your view of the world is.
I am not too happy about Obama, either -- but thats not really cause to be a bigot. I definitely pay respect to conservatives that follow a more traditional feel like Ron Paul supporters.
Even if you're old, please grow up. Its kinda annoying telling adult-age people how to respect one another. Thanks.
This can't be true. Fox News just had a number of canada analysts on that directly said that most canadians hate their privacy acts and systems for personal information protection.
Are you telling me that Fox would put up with paying someone who would lie to me about reality?
He definitely knows how to promote hatred and negativity.... I dunno if thats 'business' or not, but it sure keeps people hanging around for advertisments and voting with hate and negativity in their minds....
I was just about to post this... Everything he controls is pure blather and bustle. I hope he starts 'charging' so he can find out how much people truly value his sputem.
This reference shows 46-48% of the sample having ASPD. Not quite the same 70% that my past reference shows, but still quite large and understandable in the context to which I had presented the information.
Its the internet, not a court trial. I hardly have the time to spoonfeed. The facts are there, and you can dig em up and believe me, or just write this all off with laziness or lack of true curiosity... whichever is the case here...
Why don't you tell them for me now that you've been educated? You seem to be much more closely aware of their faults. I'm not interested in telling every fool out there about their misuse of words --- only you, so far.
I can't because part of the definition talks about exclusivity and complete control of a market... I can't just take a PART of the definition that is convenient and ignore the rest... Thats something a lawyer would do, our a shitty court.... like the people that are being 'referenced' as 'evidence' of such a case where a monopoly is not exclusive... lol.
"moâ...nopâ...oâ...ly ââ/mÉ(TM)ËnÉ'pÉ(TM)li/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [muh-nop-uh-lee] Show IPA Use monopoly in a Sentence â"noun, plural -lies. 1. exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices. Compare duopoly, oligopoly. 2. an exclusive privilege to carry on a business, traffic, or service, granted by a government. 3. the exclusive possession or control of something. 4. something that is the subject of such control, as a commodity or service. 5. a company or group that has such control. 6. the market condition that exists when there is only one seller. 7. (initial capital letter) a board game in which a player attempts to gain a monopoly of real estate by advancing around the board and purchasing property, acquiring capital by collecting rent from other players whose pieces land on that property."
Apparently what you're referencing is a misuse of the word in application for which the word does not define the circumstance properly.
Just because a court said something does not necessitate that something to make sense or have perfect wording. Those courts are headed by people, who make errors, and understand things less than 100% correctly.
Do you know that 2% of the regular population has antisocial disorder? Do you know that 70% of prison inmates have it?.... a little factoid I like to share when I talk about dogs that bark, birds that fly, and genetically differentiable humans that do things differently.
But my point is to ask you... what do we do with them? So we confirm they're a psychopath, we acknowledge its bad to really 'punish' them because it was unavoiadble.... but then what? I guess the answer is a nice cushy white box with 3 hots and a cot...
On the contrary, it may serve as an effective way to help prosecutors/psychologists/courts/etc understand a physiological relationship between a psychopath's brain and his/her actions that we want him/her held responsible for.... and the decisions for the consequences of... say... a dog that barks because dogs bark, or a dog that deliberately hacked an iPhone for use in terrorist plots...
bad analogy, I"m sorry, I read a lot of slashdot..
Slashdot Mirror
Yes.. Ad Hominem... what you've been doing since your first post.
stfu child. your mouth gets bigger with every scoop from the silver spoon.
If you understood communism you wouldn't look so stupid.
Sorry if this seems like flamebait, but this anonymous coward obviously doesn't know what he's talking about.
I can't talk to an idiot who doesn't know the meanings of words he even says.
Still a coward. I won't even read your posts you worthless bag of bigot garbage. Put your name up or be ignored.
Ahhh.. I see how you can be so blatant.. you post as an Anonymous Coward. Its nice that slashdot knows to call you out on that.
Put your name up. You talk tuff and boisterous when you've got a veil to hide behind.
pfft... you mean nothing.
How you describe Obama fanatics (and equate that minority to all supporters or 'liberals/progressives') demonstrates just how bigoted and shallow your view of people is. Of course I will attack you if your blathering resembles blatant ignorance and intolerance.
Did you get a boner over Bush being a 'strong leader' while missing all his big muckups? Better yet, how great was it to watch John McCain sell his soul and backbone for GOP support and flip flop about 100x more than Kerry ever did?
But I"m not saying all conservatives are that naive... I'm not santa clause nor would I ever try to generalize such a large group of people so hastily and recklessly.
The great thing about publicly expressed opinion is that despite how little you care about how your message is received, other people DO care about how you deliver and what you've got to say. Subsequently you'll only be less and less credited as you show how foolish your view of the world is.
I am not too happy about Obama, either -- but thats not really cause to be a bigot. I definitely pay respect to conservatives that follow a more traditional feel like Ron Paul supporters.
Even if you're old, please grow up. Its kinda annoying telling adult-age people how to respect one another. Thanks.
You make a lot of hasty generalizations for a man who implies to be intellectual.
Bigot much?
gtfo tard
This can't be true. Fox News just had a number of canada analysts on that directly said that most canadians hate their privacy acts and systems for personal information protection.
Are you telling me that Fox would put up with paying someone who would lie to me about reality?
It has already been understood. Women are da debbil, like that foosball.
... smell my finger!
(explain that one)
He definitely knows how to promote hatred and negativity.... I dunno if thats 'business' or not, but it sure keeps people hanging around for advertisments and voting with hate and negativity in their minds....
I was just about to post this... Everything he controls is pure blather and bustle. I hope he starts 'charging' so he can find out how much people truly value his sputem.
Here's a link for the 2%...
http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/a/anti_social_personality_disorder/stats.htm
This reference shows 46-48% of the sample having ASPD. Not quite the same 70% that my past reference shows, but still quite large and understandable in the context to which I had presented the information.
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673602077401 .... now lick that spoon and thank your daddy.
Its the internet, not a court trial. I hardly have the time to spoonfeed. The facts are there, and you can dig em up and believe me, or just write this all off with laziness or lack of true curiosity... whichever is the case here...
... this is 'news'....
THIS JUST IN! THERE'S A NEW VERSION TO WINAMP! GET IT NOW! ... mod me troll, fanboy... you still know this isn't newsworthy.
Why don't you tell them for me now that you've been educated? You seem to be much more closely aware of their faults. I'm not interested in telling every fool out there about their misuse of words --- only you, so far.
I can't because part of the definition talks about exclusivity and complete control of a market... I can't just take a PART of the definition that is convenient and ignore the rest... Thats something a lawyer would do, our a shitty court.... like the people that are being 'referenced' as 'evidence' of such a case where a monopoly is not exclusive... lol.
My point is that the primary reference for definition of the word 'monopoly' holds that my understanding of the definition is correct.
Keep trying... you're doing it so hard...
No. The answers are out there and very widely searchable. What I'm saying is that I am not going to spend the time to re-dig it all up and spoonfeed.
What I said is true and is not either questionable nor an urban legend.
Apparently you missed the words 'exclusive control' in #1.
I can use dictionary.com to define exclusive for you if you're not already aware of the definition of that word.
We can do this all day.
Dictionary.com says I"m right.
"moâ...nopâ...oâ...ly
ââ/mÉ(TM)ËnÉ'pÉ(TM)li/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [muh-nop-uh-lee] Show IPA
Use monopoly in a Sentence
â"noun, plural -lies.
1. exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices. Compare duopoly, oligopoly.
2. an exclusive privilege to carry on a business, traffic, or service, granted by a government.
3. the exclusive possession or control of something.
4. something that is the subject of such control, as a commodity or service.
5. a company or group that has such control.
6. the market condition that exists when there is only one seller.
7. (initial capital letter) a board game in which a player attempts to gain a monopoly of real estate by advancing around the board and purchasing property, acquiring capital by collecting rent from other players whose pieces land on that property."
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/monopoly
Apparently what you're referencing is a misuse of the word in application for which the word does not define the circumstance properly.
Just because a court said something does not necessitate that something to make sense or have perfect wording. Those courts are headed by people, who make errors, and understand things less than 100% correctly.
Jooce
You can use google. I'm sorry, but my source is myself from research I did 3 years ago for a paper I was writing about capital punishment.
Google it. or better yet, google:scholar it.
not only will all interenet threads eventually end up talking about Nazis...... they will end up talking about the recession...
Do you know that 2% of the regular population has antisocial disorder? Do you know that 70% of prison inmates have it? .... a little factoid I like to share when I talk about dogs that bark, birds that fly, and genetically differentiable humans that do things differently.
But my point is to ask you... what do we do with them? So we confirm they're a psychopath, we acknowledge its bad to really 'punish' them because it was unavoiadble.... but then what? I guess the answer is a nice cushy white box with 3 hots and a cot...
On the contrary, it may serve as an effective way to help prosecutors/psychologists/courts/etc understand a physiological relationship between a psychopath's brain and his/her actions that we want him/her held responsible for.... and the decisions for the consequences of... say... a dog that barks because dogs bark, or a dog that deliberately hacked an iPhone for use in terrorist plots...
bad analogy, I"m sorry, I read a lot of slashdot..