I word in California for IBM and we have a use it or lose it plan. The way they account for this is this: In January I get 3 weeks of vacation. The following January I get 3 more weeks minus whatever vacation I had left. That is, my original 3 weeks never expire, but if I don't use it by January I don't get more vacation.
I got a similar letter via my ISP (home user). My ISP said that if it happened again they'd terminate my service. Stopped using public torrents and I haven't heard back from either one.
Slashdot Mirror
I word in California for IBM and we have a use it or lose it plan. The way they account for this is this: In January I get 3 weeks of vacation. The following January I get 3 more weeks minus whatever vacation I had left. That is, my original 3 weeks never expire, but if I don't use it by January I don't get more vacation.
However, google has not leveraged this yet. Push gmail (without going through another server) is still on my wishlist.
Push e-mail is still not available (at least for a WM phone).
I got a similar letter via my ISP (home user). My ISP said that if it happened again they'd terminate my service. Stopped using public torrents and I haven't heard back from either one.
not as lickable as you were led to expect
I found it lickable enough
And from a user's standpoint, the difference is academic semantics.
Semantics is everything... nobody argues syntax