Ahhh, but how much time? The extremely low pressure would sublimate the mist rather quickly, and anything larger can be tracked for the few weeks it is up there...
What does the Ogallala aquifier have to do with this idea?
Not only will unfiltered water from the ocean work just as well for this purpose, but the ocean also happens to be much closer to Cape Canaveral than the aquifier.
Most launches use the Earth's rotation to provide a "boost" in velocity...
Couldn't they just fire the things in the other direction? Or in a polar orbit?
It seems as though there must be a threshold somewhere where the introduction of further space junk removes from orbit, on average, an equal amount of debris as it introduces. The farther past this threshold, the more likely that introducing debris will remove more than is introduced. There must be a point of equilibrium.
Yes, but we are far from that point, and unprotected spacecraft will start turning into swiss cheese long before.
I also played outside (this during the 90s... I was less than 10) along with my brother, sister, and another kid in the neighborhood. Biking, rollerblading, endless hours on a trampoline, climbing an olive tree, various incarnations of tag, a treehouse, wiffle ball, frying ants with a magnifying glass...
We didn't even own a TV until I was at least 8, and that was second-hand from my uncle.
Take any linux binary compiled 10 years ago and run it today on a shipping kernel. Oh wait... you can't. Do the same under Macintosh. Oh wait... can't.
Technomancer already trumped this one.
No, I think it's retarded. But there are a lot of embedded systems that run things as old as freaking DOS... still in production, still no plans to upgrade. Pray tell, why do you think that is?
I'm missing your point.
Oh, they can demand. And any business is going to say "Yeah... Right. Give up the only leverage we have on your balls? ha ha." Only they'll be more tactful about it.
It would be a bad idea to sign a contract not having this provision in the first place.
I can't repair my car. Doesn't mean I don't drive one.
Like Yuuki Dasu said, you are the one responsible for repairing the cars, so it is probably in your best interest to know how to fix them...
Somehow I don't think binaries compiled under Solaris will run under Linux.
Mac binaries don't run under Windows! News at 11!
Perhaps you meant SPARC?
Binaries compiled for the Alpha architecture won't run under x86... and so on, and so on. I'm talking about binary compatibility...
You are talking about architectures. Let me know when you get an Alpha NT binary working on XP or Vista. At least Alpha, SPARC, ARM, and other non-x86 Linux binaries still have an operating system to run on.
and that's what Microsoft delivers, version to version, year by year.
StarCraft doesn't work well on unprivileged user accounts under XP or Vista. WINE's installation to ~/.wine/ on the other hand...
Even Vista, the horrible failure that it was, bloated and crusty... still backwards compatible back to windows 3.1.
Given an infinite source of heat in a closed system (which we so far assume the universe is, lacking evidence that it's not closed), you can't decrease the entropy of the system overall.
Actually, I am wondering of you can derive much energy from the expansion of water when it becomes ice...
* Afghanistan
* Andorra
* Armenia
* Austria
* Belarus
* Bhutan
* Bolivia
* Botswana
* Burkina Faso
* Burundi
* Central African Republic
* Chad
* Czech Republic
* Ethiopia
* Hungary
* Kosovo
* Kyrgyzstan
* Laos
* Lesotho
* Liechtenstein
* Luxembourg
* Macedonia
* Malawi
* Mali
* Moldova
* Mongolia
* Nepal
* Niger
* Paraguay
* Rwanda
* San Marino
* Serbia
* Slovakia
* South Ossetia
* Swaziland
* Switzerland
* Tajikistan
* Uganda
* Vatican City
* Zambia
* Zimbabwe
Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, while not having any coastlines on the oceans, all have access to either the Caspian or Aral seas.
The only one on that list I know is hostile would be Afghanistan.
And like scotch pointed out, none of them have the resources to fight more than a guerrilla war. The worst they can do is drag other nations into a fight much like how World War I started.
Slashdot Mirror
Somehow I doubt their web servers are the same machines as their development servers...
people aren't always going to follow the letter of the law but that at the same time it's not done in the name of malice.
Drunk drivers usually aren't being malicious...
It's a "high-low" store.
Contrast with Circuit City, which was a high-really_high store.
No. 1 being: "I never lied as a kid."
Is there a way to simply change the delay to what it had been in ext3?
3. Once the identity is discovered, drop the case. This way it can't be appealed and steps 1-3 can't be ruled illegal.
Can a defendant insist that the lawsuit go forward?
Either that, or NYCL is only doing this because he thinks he can get a massive settlement out of this...
I do read it often, but I missed the how and why of his involvement with the RIAA.
before I got into the fight
When and how did you get involved in the RIAA?
raises significant issues, some of first impression
Translation: I need to buy a suit but don't get paid for 2 weeks.
But then you have those trolls that shoot the civilia^Wsatellites.
OK, so they could pick times and places that don't have a satellite in them...
Ahhh, but how much time? The extremely low pressure would sublimate the mist rather quickly, and anything larger can be tracked for the few weeks it is up there...
Why does it need to stay liquid? a small elplosive suspended in the ice would work.
*sigh*
What does the Ogallala aquifier have to do with this idea?
Not only will unfiltered water from the ocean work just as well for this purpose, but the ocean also happens to be much closer to Cape Canaveral than the aquifier.
Most launches use the Earth's rotation to provide a "boost" in velocity...
Couldn't they just fire the things in the other direction? Or in a polar orbit?
It seems as though there must be a threshold somewhere where the introduction of further space junk removes from orbit, on average, an equal amount of debris as it introduces. The farther past this threshold, the more likely that introducing debris will remove more than is introduced. There must be a point of equilibrium.
Yes, but we are far from that point, and unprotected spacecraft will start turning into swiss cheese long before.
By the time they were down to eight, the dwarfs started to suspect Hungry...
Thank you. I also own at least one GPL'd book, and at least one released under the Open Publication License.
I also played outside (this during the 90s... I was less than 10) along with my brother, sister, and another kid in the neighborhood. Biking, rollerblading, endless hours on a trampoline, climbing an olive tree, various incarnations of tag, a treehouse, wiffle ball, frying ants with a magnifying glass...
We didn't even own a TV until I was at least 8, and that was second-hand from my uncle.
Netbooks still run 32-bit processors.
Take any linux binary compiled 10 years ago and run it today on a shipping kernel. Oh wait... you can't. Do the same under Macintosh. Oh wait... can't.
Technomancer already trumped this one.
No, I think it's retarded. But there are a lot of embedded systems that run things as old as freaking DOS... still in production, still no plans to upgrade. Pray tell, why do you think that is?
I'm missing your point.
Oh, they can demand. And any business is going to say "Yeah... Right. Give up the only leverage we have on your balls? ha ha." Only they'll be more tactful about it.
It would be a bad idea to sign a contract not having this provision in the first place.
I can't repair my car. Doesn't mean I don't drive one.
Like Yuuki Dasu said, you are the one responsible for repairing the cars, so it is probably in your best interest to know how to fix them...
Somehow I don't think binaries compiled under Solaris will run under Linux.
Mac binaries don't run under Windows! News at 11!
Perhaps you meant SPARC?
Binaries compiled for the Alpha architecture won't run under x86... and so on, and so on. I'm talking about binary compatibility...
You are talking about architectures. Let me know when you get an Alpha NT binary working on XP or Vista. At least Alpha, SPARC, ARM, and other non-x86 Linux binaries still have an operating system to run on.
and that's what Microsoft delivers, version to version, year by year.
StarCraft doesn't work well on unprivileged user accounts under XP or Vista. WINE's installation to ~/.wine/ on the other hand...
Even Vista, the horrible failure that it was, bloated and crusty... still backwards compatible back to windows 3.1.
DOSbox is multi-platform.
The Sahara is a better source, and we have lots of our own sand...
Given an infinite source of heat in a closed system (which we so far assume the universe is, lacking evidence that it's not closed), you can't decrease the entropy of the system overall.
Actually, I am wondering of you can derive much energy from the expansion of water when it becomes ice...
Yes, those landlocked countries are a dangerous bunch~
* Afghanistan
* Andorra
* Armenia
* Austria
* Belarus
* Bhutan
* Bolivia
* Botswana
* Burkina Faso
* Burundi
* Central African Republic
* Chad
* Czech Republic
* Ethiopia
* Hungary
* Kosovo
* Kyrgyzstan
* Laos
* Lesotho
* Liechtenstein
* Luxembourg
* Macedonia
* Malawi
* Mali
* Moldova
* Mongolia
* Nepal
* Niger
* Paraguay
* Rwanda
* San Marino
* Serbia
* Slovakia
* South Ossetia
* Swaziland
* Switzerland
* Tajikistan
* Uganda
* Vatican City
* Zambia
* Zimbabwe
Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, while not having any coastlines on the oceans, all have access to either the Caspian or Aral seas.
The only one on that list I know is hostile would be Afghanistan.
And like scotch pointed out, none of them have the resources to fight more than a guerrilla war. The worst they can do is drag other nations into a fight much like how World War I started.