Usually tax write-offs for donations of physical goods are in the amount of the value of the goods (in this case, probably the amount that you could sell them for).
That is my impression as well, although donating could turn out to be the better option.
Car analogy: You might not be able to sell a car at the Kelly Blue Book value, but you might be able to get away with donating it and writing it off for that much.
I recently bought the first season of Stargate, and later noticed a little icon on the back of the packaging saying that the DVDs were copy-protected. This was after I finished making ISOs.
Care to elaborate? You said something stupid, and he very sarcastically corrected you on it. How is that trolling? At worst, it is flamebait to someone that has a short fuse.
Paranoia is no way to deal with nuclear risks, but neither is being glib.
glib: Showing little thought, preparation, or concern
cynical: Expressing jaded or scornful skepticism or negativity
I am favoring the second word choice.
Allies should not be crashing nuclear reactors into each other by accident.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I get the impression that we don't keep very close tabs on the exact locations of our own subs, for security reasons. Much less advertise them to our allies.
If extra precautions are necessary to prevent a recurrence, then they should at least be considered, even if there is some impact on e.g. the realism of training exercises.
The only thing I want impairing realism in an exercise is a self-handicap on our listening ability. Which would make it harder to prevent collisions.
There is a history of nuclear warheads being lost due to crashed subs and bombers, and it's definitely something we want to avoid.
There is. But better passive sonar is a much better solution, if you ask me.
Because of course as soon as they bill you and find out you don't exist then they have a description of the car.
Better than that. They have the number of the fake plate you are using. Unless you intend to switch plates every time they check to see if you exist, they can have the system alert them the next time that number passes through the gate, and have a police cruiser standing by to catch such violators.
Slashdot Mirror
Hong Kong is just a tiny, tiny island.
And judging from the Google Earth image, only half a city.
I need to ladle on the sarcasm thicker next time.
Usually tax write-offs for donations of physical goods are in the amount of the value of the goods (in this case, probably the amount that you could sell them for).
That is my impression as well, although donating could turn out to be the better option.
Car analogy: You might not be able to sell a car at the Kelly Blue Book value, but you might be able to get away with donating it and writing it off for that much.
As long as the write-off isn't less, I don't see the problem here.
They have been up for grabs for over 10 years now.
What are you talking about? Starcraft LAN play works perfectly.
I recently bought the first season of Stargate, and later noticed a little icon on the back of the packaging saying that the DVDs were copy-protected. This was after I finished making ISOs.
64-bit fla... oh, wait. Nevermind.
China vs. India lunar landers.
^- that's a troll.
Care to elaborate? You said something stupid, and he very sarcastically corrected you on it. How is that trolling? At worst, it is flamebait to someone that has a short fuse.
Well, they want to be our friends, and I feel compelled to oblige them after that little incident in the 1700's.
Paranoia is no way to deal with nuclear risks, but neither is being glib.
glib: Showing little thought, preparation, or concern
cynical: Expressing jaded or scornful skepticism or negativity
I am favoring the second word choice.
Allies should not be crashing nuclear reactors into each other by accident.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I get the impression that we don't keep very close tabs on the exact locations of our own subs, for security reasons. Much less advertise them to our allies.
If extra precautions are necessary to prevent a recurrence, then they should at least be considered, even if there is some impact on e.g. the realism of training exercises.
The only thing I want impairing realism in an exercise is a self-handicap on our listening ability. Which would make it harder to prevent collisions.
There is a history of nuclear warheads being lost due to crashed subs and bombers, and it's definitely something we want to avoid.
There is. But better passive sonar is a much better solution, if you ask me.
Given that they where both SSBNs it seems somewhat unlikely one would be tracking the other.
Why not? One submarine stumbling onto and following another sub is probably the best form of practice outside of war itself.
Read his post again. Satellites colliding in space is a much more likely event than SSNs colliding in midair.
You were supposed to Whoosh! him.
a suggested mechanism for this sort of inheritance
Epigenetics?
A single disc.
"Lenny" was the wind-up, walking pair of toy binoculars.
Because of course as soon as they bill you and find out you don't exist then they have a description of the car.
Better than that. They have the number of the fake plate you are using. Unless you intend to switch plates every time they check to see if you exist, they can have the system alert them the next time that number passes through the gate, and have a police cruiser standing by to catch such violators.
Yes, and the license-plate reading system couldn't possibly be used for that purpose.
Central California doesn't have toll roads for many hundreds of miles, either. If it did, they would look like this (but without the snow or green)
Surely your laser isn't so busy keeping squirrels off the bird feeder that it doesn't have time to shoot the occasional deer near the porch.
Conyers is African American/Black/Colored, whatever term you want to use.
Suprisingly, AC is correct
it's not prior art for anything.
Prior art, it is
For quite important project
Project called Haiku
(is "called" one sylable or two?)