Umm what? IPv4 has no hardware firewall either, untill you physically place one between you and the internet. IPv6 is no different, its just generally not going to be playing hokey games with fake addressing
You laugh, I once had an onsite technician from Bellsouth thinking that the badgerbadgerbadger site was our speed test when he walked up while we were bored browsing waiting for him to finish. He proceeded to ask what the number of badgers meant, and if a snake was a bad thing.
This is not an application calling APIs. This is additional code being loaded into an existing application and subsequently compiled and run by an interpreter. The additional code is being distributed by a third party, and only exists to modify the behavior of the original code, and thus is a derived work of the original code.
Let me give a simple example: Party a creates the following code: Main 10 Execute Init 20 print $a 30 exit Init 10 set $a = "Hello World" 20 Load Plugin Modules 30 Execute Plugin Init subroutines
Party b creates the following plugin module Init 10 set $a = "[bold]Hello World[\bold]"
Clearly Party B's code is derived from Party A's code, it only exists to modify the work of Party A's code, and does not have function on its own except to transform the origonal code.
All they have to do is not use GPL code if they don't want to follow the GPL. They can always write the other code themselves for a much larger than free cost.
Well, it doesn't specifically include them, which is the current rationale for excluding them. Not that I agree with that. The problem comes in with the previous wording "a well regulated malitia", which could have just been given as a reason, has been interpreted as an entitiy given those rights, and the power to regulate that entity
Unfortunately, that wasn't an attempt at looking intelligent, but a bad habit I picked up years ago as a less than white hat. I honestly didn't even see that I did that, good catch.
If you read the actual article, or even the summary, you might have noticed that they are discussing virii, not bacteria, and their interactivity and relative stability, not just "oh look they're there!"
No they won't, because the price doesn't matter at all once it takes more energy to extract than is released. It could be a billion dollars an ounce and it still wouldn't be cost effective.
ICBMs do not do any jetting at all, its not a comparison, as they are ballistic rockets. You can think of them as flying mortars more than missiles. The closest applicable missile would be a cruise missile, but honestly, they are designed more for distance than speed. You don't need your cruise missile to get there ridiculously fast, but you do want a ridiculous range for them, at a sufficient speed to not be destroyed or give advanced warning, while still making it to the target in time for intercept.
This wasn't baiting, I am completely serious. You can see the same example circa 1930s I just can't remember the guy's name. Chaplin or something maybe.
Just because you disagree with a comment, doesn't make it a troll.
Slashdot Mirror
Seriously? You use this site and have never heard of an atomic clock?
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IKnowYouKnowIKnow
At some point you have to admit, a cigar can just be a cigar.
Umm what? IPv4 has no hardware firewall either, untill you physically place one between you and the internet. IPv6 is no different, its just generally not going to be playing hokey games with fake addressing
You laugh, I once had an onsite technician from Bellsouth thinking that the badgerbadgerbadger site was our speed test when he walked up while we were bored browsing waiting for him to finish. He proceeded to ask what the number of badgers meant, and if a snake was a bad thing.
Tell that to Cisco re: busybox, they'd love to know.
Which is why the externalities of pollution need to be accounted for via regulation
I'm afraid that is not how copyright law works.
This is not an application calling APIs. This is additional code being loaded into an existing application and subsequently compiled and run by an interpreter. The additional code is being distributed by a third party, and only exists to modify the behavior of the original code, and thus is a derived work of the original code.
Let me give a simple example:
Party a creates the following code:
Main
10 Execute Init
20 print $a
30 exit
Init
10 set $a = "Hello World"
20 Load Plugin Modules
30 Execute Plugin Init subroutines
Party b creates the following plugin module
Init
10 set $a = "[bold]Hello World[\bold]"
Clearly Party B's code is derived from Party A's code, it only exists to modify the work of Party A's code, and does not have function on its own except to transform the origonal code.
Just exactly how is this different than modifying the code itself and creating a derived product? If you can answer that, you'll have won his case.
All they have to do is not use GPL code if they don't want to follow the GPL. They can always write the other code themselves for a much larger than free cost.
Well, it doesn't specifically include them, which is the current rationale for excluding them. Not that I agree with that. The problem comes in with the previous wording "a well regulated malitia", which could have just been given as a reason, has been interpreted as an entitiy given those rights, and the power to regulate that entity
Unfortunately, that wasn't an attempt at looking intelligent, but a bad habit I picked up years ago as a less than white hat. I honestly didn't even see that I did that, good catch.
If you read the actual article, or even the summary, you might have noticed that they are discussing virii, not bacteria, and their interactivity and relative stability, not just "oh look they're there!"
You can be a mercantilist jackass if no one stands up and fights back because you own half their debt.
And the previous track record of stopping illegal wire tapping is abysmal...
Interlinks. Router to switch, switch to switch, ISP to ISP, etc.
Because its prohibitively expensive to be a physical plant provider for the last mile when there is already an established player?
Yeah its called a Natural Monopoly
Heck, it is exactly correct twice a day, which is more than i can say for any "working" clock
No, because again, price is irrelevant when it takes X or more units of Y to extract X units of Y from something.
No they won't, because the price doesn't matter at all once it takes more energy to extract than is released. It could be a billion dollars an ounce and it still wouldn't be cost effective.
ICBMs do not do any jetting at all, its not a comparison, as they are ballistic rockets. You can think of them as flying mortars more than missiles. The closest applicable missile would be a cruise missile, but honestly, they are designed more for distance than speed. You don't need your cruise missile to get there ridiculously fast, but you do want a ridiculous range for them, at a sufficient speed to not be destroyed or give advanced warning, while still making it to the target in time for intercept.
Who said anything about the dinosaurs adapting? The *Earth* adapted.
What exactly do you think adapt means? Here's a hint: it doesn't mean return to status quo.
This wasn't baiting, I am completely serious. You can see the same example circa 1930s I just can't remember the guy's name. Chaplin or something maybe.
Just because you disagree with a comment, doesn't make it a troll.
Check out the Tea Party rallies and you can see for yourself.