Do you guys not realize there are methods of writing other than transferring data via cable or wifi? I see a lot of comments saying it doesn't matter, but it could if you're taking high resolution video. I hear that some of these overheat a bit during that, but I'm curious if that is only the case with the one with fewer chips, thus too much activity on a single chip causes the heat issue?
Once the chips become prolific enough might as well just use a magnet to wipe the strips and stick to using the chips. That is until the cops get chip readers in their vehicles as well.
No, you don't have to swerve. Swerving is a bad move. Nothing that removes control of your vehicle is a good choice. The only legit swerving where people can control it is called drifting, and that's not something I trust a computer or most people to do. Calling me dim doesn't help anything, unless it makes you think you're cool.
This is a classic argument over general science and applied science. They learned so many things and recorded so much data that we'll be sorting through it for the next century. Did it specifically come up with the next Velcro? I am not sure one way or another, but the tools and life support systems and preventative maintenance routines, as well as best practices on corrective maintenance are all so unbelievably invaluable for future space exploration.
And my argument is not to prioritize ethics, but to prioritize instead remaining as much in control of the vehicle as possible. When you swerve the vehicle loses traction and it may not respond the way the wheels turning intend it to, thus any ethical planning involved would be rendered useless. My argument is completely to retain control of the vehicle the way that a human driver is supposed to. Swerving is just a bad idea whether you or a computer is doing it. It's a physical issue, not an ethical one.
It's about the name, apparently. And if a system that does little more than keep your plane steered in one direction while keeping altitude can hold the name, then a system that can navigate lanes and avoid obstacles with great reliability should exceed that minimum standard for that name as well.
Why aren't you raging about the airline industry calling their system "auto-pilot" when it is far less capable in terms of maneuvering in comparison to Tesla's?
Anyone who swerves is an idiot and did not pay attention during driver's education. You can steer around obstacles, but swerving is one of the worst decisions you can make.
Yes, because of the internet, and the fact that despite both being former Republican Governors, they are siphoning votes from both parties. I've been on computer networks since the late 80s and the internet since the early 90s. I've seen how it has grown, and how the general population has grown with it. But your age reference may have brought up a reasonable point. At your age you may not be able to adapt to change as easily.
You also need a tech lesson. The internet wasn't as wide spread back then. People were not as hyper-aware. It isn't civics that is misunderstood, or maybe it is. The dynamic has changed.
You're typing on it. The internet. It wasn't nearly as wide spread, and people were not nearly as aware of every tiny issue. Being old and naive isn't really much better.
He's far from perfect, but the other two have so many negatives I wish they would get absolutely no votes. I actually kind of like Johnson, jokes aside. I disagree with far fewer of his REAL positions (I reject campaign promise positions). You can track Clinton's real positions through her voting record, previous statements, and how they all shifted as she made a carbon copy of the Sanders campaign in order to grab the Progressive vote, despite her own position being a Neo Conservative. Trump is just unbelievable, unreal, no. Both of them way no. I'd take Jill Stein and her wackiness over either of them.
I just hope it sends more people to third party. I know Gary Johnson isn't likely to win, but if he gets close to 10% of the vote it'll change the entire scope of all future elections. If he managed to take an entire state, like New Mexico (where he was governor for 8 years) it would scare the hell out of the big parties. I do otherwise agree with your points. Bernie got so screwed over, as has the USA.
Slashdot Mirror
The third party developer list is readily available and huge. No need to wonder about it like this.
Do you guys not realize there are methods of writing other than transferring data via cable or wifi? I see a lot of comments saying it doesn't matter, but it could if you're taking high resolution video. I hear that some of these overheat a bit during that, but I'm curious if that is only the case with the one with fewer chips, thus too much activity on a single chip causes the heat issue?
Well if it uses those key words, no reason TO read it, right? That means it is awesome!
Also any time a law contains words such as "common sense" or "affordable" or "patriot"
Once the chips become prolific enough might as well just use a magnet to wipe the strips and stick to using the chips. That is until the cops get chip readers in their vehicles as well.
This gift card is one I just purchased to pay the IRS. They called me and said I'd be arrested if I didn't!
Thanks. My wife and daughter watch it back in the USA while I'm deployed to the middle east. I shouldn't be a customer?
No, you don't have to swerve. Swerving is a bad move. Nothing that removes control of your vehicle is a good choice. The only legit swerving where people can control it is called drifting, and that's not something I trust a computer or most people to do. Calling me dim doesn't help anything, unless it makes you think you're cool.
This is a classic argument over general science and applied science. They learned so many things and recorded so much data that we'll be sorting through it for the next century. Did it specifically come up with the next Velcro? I am not sure one way or another, but the tools and life support systems and preventative maintenance routines, as well as best practices on corrective maintenance are all so unbelievably invaluable for future space exploration.
And my argument is not to prioritize ethics, but to prioritize instead remaining as much in control of the vehicle as possible. When you swerve the vehicle loses traction and it may not respond the way the wheels turning intend it to, thus any ethical planning involved would be rendered useless. My argument is completely to retain control of the vehicle the way that a human driver is supposed to. Swerving is just a bad idea whether you or a computer is doing it. It's a physical issue, not an ethical one.
And you keep quoting only part and avoiding the question.
It's about the name, apparently. And if a system that does little more than keep your plane steered in one direction while keeping altitude can hold the name, then a system that can navigate lanes and avoid obstacles with great reliability should exceed that minimum standard for that name as well.
So one of them is complex. What is the least complex auto-pilot that still holds the name that is apparently some big problem?
Why aren't you raging about the airline industry calling their system "auto-pilot" when it is far less capable in terms of maneuvering in comparison to Tesla's?
That's completely understandable.
Since swerving is a terrible choice, I would prioritize braking.
Anyone who swerves is an idiot and did not pay attention during driver's education. You can steer around obstacles, but swerving is one of the worst decisions you can make.
Yes, because of the internet, and the fact that despite both being former Republican Governors, they are siphoning votes from both parties. I've been on computer networks since the late 80s and the internet since the early 90s. I've seen how it has grown, and how the general population has grown with it. But your age reference may have brought up a reasonable point. At your age you may not be able to adapt to change as easily.
I do have to agree with you there.
You really didn't add anything, but thanks for the post.
You also need a tech lesson. The internet wasn't as wide spread back then. People were not as hyper-aware. It isn't civics that is misunderstood, or maybe it is. The dynamic has changed.
You're typing on it. The internet. It wasn't nearly as wide spread, and people were not nearly as aware of every tiny issue. Being old and naive isn't really much better.
You are making a lot of claims of their state sponsored actions. Show me.
He's far from perfect, but the other two have so many negatives I wish they would get absolutely no votes. I actually kind of like Johnson, jokes aside. I disagree with far fewer of his REAL positions (I reject campaign promise positions). You can track Clinton's real positions through her voting record, previous statements, and how they all shifted as she made a carbon copy of the Sanders campaign in order to grab the Progressive vote, despite her own position being a Neo Conservative. Trump is just unbelievable, unreal, no. Both of them way no. I'd take Jill Stein and her wackiness over either of them.
I just hope it sends more people to third party. I know Gary Johnson isn't likely to win, but if he gets close to 10% of the vote it'll change the entire scope of all future elections. If he managed to take an entire state, like New Mexico (where he was governor for 8 years) it would scare the hell out of the big parties. I do otherwise agree with your points. Bernie got so screwed over, as has the USA.