But you could use duct or conduit for the fiber runs and seal the ends with putty and terminate in a fiber shelf that he can keep closed. Fiber should be protected anyway. If he actually has rats in the server room (his office), chewing the patch cables then I guess all he can do is punt and keep a few spare patches on hand.
Hmmm...I'm using a Mac and FF3. I don't see anything close to what you're complaining about. Have you tried the actual release version or are you basing your assessment on some old beta?
Can you cite a specific, repeatable issue? Or possibly a bug report?
>> Vista was developed for future hardware. Vista will be just as fast as XP in a couple years
Logically invalid. As the hardware gets faster, then so does both Vista and XP running on it by roughly equal proportions. Consequently at no point will Vista ever be as fast as XP given a level playing field.
You fail to take future XP service packs into account.
Slashdot Mirror
"buy your own ISP and then create whatever rules or freedoms you want"
Up until your upstream drops you as a peer for violating their TOS.
That's "iCandy".
But you could use duct or conduit for the fiber runs and seal the ends with putty and terminate in a fiber shelf that he can keep closed. Fiber should be protected anyway. If he actually has rats in the server room (his office), chewing the patch cables then I guess all he can do is punt and keep a few spare patches on hand.
I'm gonna need more cables.
and news reports and... Flash is no more evil than guns or pencils. Flash doesn't create ads; people create ads.
You hoping for a job at Sony?
Hmmm...I'm using a Mac and FF3. I don't see anything close to what you're complaining about. Have you tried the actual release version or are you basing your assessment on some old beta? Can you cite a specific, repeatable issue? Or possibly a bug report?
>> Vista was developed for future hardware. Vista will be just as fast as XP in a couple years
Logically invalid. As the hardware gets faster, then so does both Vista and XP running on it by roughly equal proportions. Consequently at no point will Vista ever be as fast as XP given a level playing field.
You fail to take future XP service packs into account.
Just curious...which CAD? Could it be some license management running in the background?