The GNOME project has adopted Mono (and thus C#) although it has quite a few Mono lead devs on its board. I doubt anyone else in FOSS land or other technologies companies relish the idea of getting into bed with Microsoft. They have a history of fucking their partners.
As I mentioned earlier, C# is just a knock off of Java.
It's extremely similar if you're familiar with both, 98% of a port can be done with search and replace... s/using/import/g, etc.
You can't tell anyone about what you saw due to all the restricions, so whats the matter arguing the difference. The point is that Java is open and available for review (and modification) and.NET isn't (are you from China or NK or something that you don't get the difference)?
Of course there isn't anything to add.. you've failed to do that in every post you've made.
So basically you're lying (in the case of #2,.NET isn't open source, Java is) and making excuses for the rest like "nah ahhhh, Imma gone tell on youuuu."
Slashdot Mirror
Oh right it's standards based, which is why Mono can run most .NET apps.. right?
Oh whats that? Mono can't run 25% of the .NET apps out there, just like Wine? .NET core API's are "kinda" open source? That's great!!! :) :) :) :)
Darn I need to read up on this stuff.
The GNOME project has adopted Mono (and thus C#) although it has quite a few Mono lead devs on its board. I doubt anyone else in FOSS land or other technologies companies relish the idea of getting into bed with Microsoft. They have a history of fucking their partners.
As I mentioned earlier, C# is just a knock off of Java.
It's extremely similar if you're familiar with both, 98% of a port can be done with search and replace... s/using/import/g, etc.
It's also terrible, FYI.
C# does have some nice features, although they threw in all kinds of retardation along with those niceties.
In a way... sure.
It fits the exact same position as the wine project. It's a clean room reverse engineered version of a Microsoft technology stack.
How well does Wine work these days? How well does Mono work?
C# is just a windows specific knockoff of Java.
It's important if you're specifically looking for a Microsoft job, which is like 10% of the job market.
With such poor leadership and Microsoft's general power waning, it probably won't ever surpass being a niche technology.
Have you used GIMP in past 5 years?
RTFM NOOB
You can't tell anyone about what you saw due to all the restricions, so whats the matter arguing the difference. The point is that Java is open and available for review (and modification) and .NET isn't (are you from China or NK or something that you don't get the difference)?
Of course there isn't anything to add.. you've failed to do that in every post you've made.
So basically you're lying (in the case of #2, .NET isn't open source, Java is) and making excuses for the rest like "nah ahhhh, Imma gone tell on youuuu."
GG .NET fan boy.
Oh right except that Java is open source and .NET isn't.
Anonymous Coward FAIL.
So, you're touting .NET's cross platform friendlyness against Java's?
Really?
They're all pretty accurate.
NIO supports async and is a part of the official class library standard.
You can't have a 1.5+ certified java implementation without it working.
Mina is great although the brains behind the project left and started a new project, Netty.
I've heard from multiple sources that netty tends to outperform mina although I've been using mina with no problems.
Finally, all the worlds enterprise systems can switch to Java... ....oh wait
Yeah because someone's going to cry about making one of the billion learner organs out there into a sweet 8-bit instrument.
FYS
I think I speak for all of us here on Slashdot when I say, porn file server running Linux.
It's not the size of the fleet but the motion of the ocean, ya dig?
So what you're saying is that we need Boobuntu.
I haven't googled yet but I wouldn't be surprised if it exists.
I've been playing the beta for quite a while.
If just the first installment cost $150, it'd be a good deal.
The game is that good. (No I don't work for blizzard)
Don't worry, it's still safer than the Windows servers you run.
Completely wrong. OpenGL has always had an edge feature wise.
Khronos has been fixing the coherency of OpenGL api, slimming and streamlining it to make it simpler for developers in the same vein as d3d.
I think it's funny you claim to work "in GPU computing" when it's obvious to anyone who actually does that you don't.
Yeah, this'll be great until we find out they're also immune to mosquito repellent and their desire for human blood has been quadrupled.
Not only that, but they posit that Microsoft's solution solves the issue of both Nvidia's proprietary-ness and the OpenCL boards's "lack of action."
Fuck this article, I wish I could unclick on it.