Slashdot Mirror


What To Do With an Old G5 Tower?

lunatic1969 writes "I've got an old G5 PowerPC tower that's sitting in a spare room not seeing much in the way of use. I'd like to stick a Linux distribution on it and maybe breathe some life back into it. I've got a few vague ideas — it might be a handy file server, streaming video for a security system, or simply just to have a spare box around. My question is therefore in two parts: First, are there any particularly creative projects or ideas anyone has for an old G5, and second and most important, which distribution currently offers the best support for this box?"

417 comments

  1. PPC Linux by worx101 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yellow Dog probably has the best support, but you could always look at the PPC version of Ubuntu.

    1. Re:PPC Linux by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I run a stripped PPC Ubu on a Blue and White G3. Works. As good as the R4000 Indigo on Irix 6.5 that sits next to it. (NOT NeXT to it!)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:PPC Linux by cynyr · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd run gentoo on it but I run gentoo on everything, including my dead badger ( http://www.strangehorizons.com/2004/20040405/badger.shtml ) http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-ppc.xml

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    3. Re:PPC Linux by segin · · Score: 1

      Why not install Mac OS X, then it'll be just like that box that sits NeXT to it. Mach kernel, bundles, and all.

    4. Re:PPC Linux by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Why not install Mac OS X

      I don't think that hardware is supported anymore.

      That's a tricky sticking point for some people.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:PPC Linux by tclgeek · · Score: 1

      > Why not install Mac OS X

      I don't think that hardware is supported anymore.

      That's a tricky sticking point for some people.

      My G5 runs Tiger just fine.

    6. Re:PPC Linux by silverdr · · Score: 1

      Where do you find PPC version of *current* Ubuntu?

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
    7. Re:PPC Linux by radikll · · Score: 1

      Yellow Dog linux is a very poor distro. It's repos are old, the default desktop is odd and hard to work with, and updates are infrequent. If I were you I'd stick to the standard distros like Debian or Gentoo. Many of the small distros that support ppc aren't very good. Ubuntu ppc is only available as a daily build of 10.10. So, unless you like using the stuff at the very very bleeding edge... It wouldn't be a good idea.

      Basically, use Debian... or if you're daring use Gentoo.

      List of ppc distros (most are outdated):
      http://penguinppc.org/about/distributions.php

    8. Re:PPC Linux by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      >> Why not install Mac OS X
      >>
      >> I don't think that hardware is supported anymore.
      >>
      >> That's a tricky sticking point for some people.
      >>
      >
      > My G5 runs Tiger just fine.

      I could say the same sort of thing about an Atari ST.

      Being unsupported doesn't mean that the software suddenly self-destructs.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:PPC Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this! Gentoo is the thing for everything.

    10. Re:PPC Linux by segin · · Score: 1

      It's a tricky sticking point for what people? "Unsupported" simply means that if you call tech support, they won't help you, and the majority of people don't call tech support.

    11. Re:PPC Linux by DJAshnar · · Score: 1

      I say PPC linux. Make it into a firewall and toss another nic into it :) Be sure to add NAS support, too :)

    12. Re:PPC Linux by ryanov · · Score: 1

      No, that's not necessarily what it means. Not all versions of MacOS X will install on all hardware. I'm trying to remember what I tried to install on a white G3 (PowerMac 7500 form factor) but it wouldn't install. 10.2 maybe?

    13. Re:PPC Linux by lunatic1969 · · Score: 1

      >> Why not install Mac OS X >> >> I don't think that hardware is supported anymore. >> >> That's a tricky sticking point for some people. >> > > My G5 runs Tiger just fine.

      I could say the same sort of thing about an Atari ST.

      Being unsupported doesn't mean that the software suddenly self-destructs.

      Very true. However, given the choice between running a box with an operating system and software that still gets supported, and an equally capable box that doesn't - I'm going to pick the box that is still supported. It's not like it's costing me more. Why not?

    14. Re:PPC Linux by lunatic1969 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. I can have a box that can't receive operating system upgrades or can't install the latest version of such-n-such, or for no additional money I can have one that does. I'm not seeing the downside of switching.

  2. yellow dog linux still around? by alen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    personally i'd send it to China for "recycling" or just junk it or donate it. you'll get better performance buying a new iMac and virtualizing the G5. File servers are so last decade. just get an external hard drive and connect it to a TV all of which come with USB ports these days and play a long list of media files

    1. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Then you have to carry the drive around like some sort of cretin. File servers are more useful this decade than last, when I can store every DVD I have as iso and a format my smartphone can play.

    2. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I bought a drive *instead* of a file server. I just got a nice external case with esata and a huge fast drive. It's way faster than networking, and it's very easy to move around.

      I'm not wasting power, making heat, or maintaining another system as a file server, nor running network cables or messing with wireless anywhere I might need it. Does that make me a cretin? I don't really think so.

    3. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The lack of RAID does that for you.
      Plus the lack of rsync to automatically backup everything for you, and the fact that your other network devices cannot easily access it.

    4. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is simpler to buy multiple cheap network aware hdd enclosures and re-flash the SoC with whatever you want. Just last week I downloaded the gpl firmware for an AirLink product I am retiring to my LAN services bookshelf... time to do some reading.

    5. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      What TV is this that has a USB port and "plays a long list of media files" (I need DivX/XviD and H.264) ? What about those of us with projectors?

    6. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I couldn't agree more with this sentiment. The Powermac G5s all idle at around 150W, and most used about 600-700W under load. Left idle all year serving files it'll cost $150 a year just in electricity to run... All this for a slower machine than a MacMini, which doing the equivalent thing would use 10W.

    7. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If you are going to have something like that, a Mac Mini or a Atom powered Linux box would be better. I built an Atom "server" and the thing is nearly silent, and just sips power. I can't imagine having a G5 sitting around for doing fileserving or putting linux on it unless power consumption, noise, heat, and speed are not an issue.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    8. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      A debate of storage servers vs portable storage devices.

      One protects against unauthorized access and does automatic backup.
      The other is portable and can be used to store backups offsite.

      I don't understand the purpose of the debate. Can someone explain it to me?

    9. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      File servers are so last decade

      What a powerful statement, brother! I wish I can convince my boss the same! Junk those stupid Excel files and store everything in a mySQL server, that should be the way!

      Oh wait, you're talking about home? Sorry, my bad.

      connect it to a TV all of which come with USB ports these days and play a long list of media files

      Hoo yeah! Plus, during a MPAA raid, the evidence can be quickly removed. Right, brother?

      /sarcasm

    10. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      The G5 however is a very bad choice of system for this. It has no space for extra drives. You are pretty much stuffed with the 2 drive bay and one more drive in the optical device bay. It is not really worth it for this. A 26£ ATX case from Maplin in the UK can accommodate 6 drives straight away and 6 more using two 40£ IcyBoxes or 4 more + DVD using a 17£ Silverstone SATA enclosure. With an old P3 motherboard and controllers and a top range Akasa PS the BOM comes to around 150£. No external drive unit or NAS unit can come even close in terms of value for the money to this one (and if you are a fan of GUIs you can run FreeNAS on it anyway).

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    11. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by fuzzix · · Score: 1

      personally i'd send it to China for "recycling"...

      Aye, junk it. One of the considerations now in my bang for buck considerations in running home servers is the power bill. Sure, it was cool to have my old P3 tower sitting there as a little slackware workhorse doing mail, web, shells and everything else for me but at the same time it's sucking up 200W... I could get a dual core atom box which runs on 50W for little money.

    12. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Can someone tell me how to get a rough estimate of the power draw on my old G4? It's a twin 500MHz gigabit Ethernet model. I tried googling, but I can't find this question addressed anywhere. I've been using the machine as a file/iTunes/Bittorrent/web server because I already had it AND I'm poor. But if it's costing me too much on electricity, I may just buy a hard drive to replace it, or maybe something to replace the server function.

    13. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by vrodic · · Score: 1

      600-700W under load? This must be wrong... My current Core2 Duo E8200 Geforce 9800 GT combo is about 100W idle and Max 170W under load. With 2 3.5 inch SATA drives.

    14. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by hjf · · Score: 1

      Hopefullly we won't get to the point where the RIAA can raid your home.

    15. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's about right. From Apple's docs: idle 120W, max 420W for the single-processor 1.6GHz version, idle 140W, max 604W for the dual-processor 2GHz version. The old G5s were power guzzlers. Each CPU could use 100W by itself. They were the reason that Apple laptops were so slow for so long: IBM couldn't produce a decent low-power chip. Even the 'low power' FX variant used up to around 50W - there was no way Apple could fit that in a laptop. Remember that these machines come from the same era as the Prescott P4s, which peaked at 120W per CPU. Two CPUs, a load of support chips, RAM, multiple drives, and so on all added up.

      Some of the G5s were water cooled, and all of them came with an impressive case design to maximise air flow.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by omnichad · · Score: 1
    17. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Don't recycle an G5, particularly a multiple-core: they're still worth at least $400 on eBay!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    18. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by kingofnexus · · Score: 1

      The latest Samsung TV's play all sorts of video. I have a UE46C8000 and it plays every video file on my NTFS hard drive, .avi's, mp4's and mkv's alike, with subtitle support also.

    19. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      Apple's still got specs for all their stuff on their site.
      http://support.apple.com/specs/#g4%20500mhz
      Now while this will tell you how much your tower uses, plugging in a kill-a-watt for a week or so will tell you how much your entire setup uses under real life load.

    20. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by supercrisp · · Score: 1

      Omnichad and Zugmeister---thanks very much for the help and advice. If the thing is drawing 220 at peak, it's not so bad, especially as I've pulled the video card (stupid failing fan on Radeon 8500) and as it mostly just idles along under whatever load Azureus puts on it. Still, I think I'll have to get one of these Kill-A-Watt things; they're surprisingly cheap, only 1.4 boxes of diapers (my new cost metric).

    21. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You'd have to try pretty hard to get a PIII that high (hint: A server doesn't need that Voodoo 5). I have a PIII-600E running as a router. At 14W peak for the chip and about 35W average for the entire system it's not bad at all, as full-blown PCs go.

    22. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Your numbers are way off.

      The G5 towers have 600W power supplies, there's no way they could ever draw 700W.
      At idle (with energy saver setting at "Automatic" or "Reduced" my dual 2GHz draws about 40W. I max out current draw at about 200W under max load with two drives running.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    23. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Those are containers, what codecs does it play? Where do I get a hard drive in a USB enclosure to replace my raid array? Ok, that last one was sarcastic.

    24. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see, no ability to RAID, can only be accessed by one device at a time, you lose everything if you drop it, no ability to connect to it from someone else if you left it plugged into the TV.

      A cheap low power NAS RAID, or a DIY kit around a Nano, Atom, or possibly an ARM based system will use next to no power, produce almost no heat and you can stick it somewhere that you wont hear it and be able to access it around the house at 1Gbit.

    25. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by ekimseekem · · Score: 1

      Sold mine on Kijiji (free classifieds) for $550, went quickly too, so someone out there finds them useful...

    26. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by segin · · Score: 1

      And if you need to access the exact same files over three computers, at the exact same time, what do you do? Copy the files over to the other two machines?

      And anything short of the most efficient use of power is a waste? No, you're not a cretin, you're just anal-retentive.

    27. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by kingofnexus · · Score: 1

      From the manual:
      Divx 3.11, 4.x, 5.1, 6.0
      XviD
      H.264 BP/MP/HP
      MPEG4 SP/ASP
      Motion JPEG
      Windows Media Video v9
      MPEG1
      MPEG2
      VC1

      In containers such as
      avi, mkv, asf, wmv, mp4, 3gp, vro, mpg, mpeg, ts ,tp , trp

      With audio codecs:
      MP3/AC3/LPCM/ADPCM/Dts Core/WMA/AAC/HE-AAC/DD+

      You could always hook your raid array up to your network to access stuff.

    28. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by segin · · Score: 1

      It's all about what numbers will be on that piece of paper the power company mails you each month. This piece of paper is commonly called a "bill". The debate is over keeping old hardware even though it has a higher cost per unit of performance, vs. being energy efficient by using modern hardware. The majority of people here are all about cutting their electric bill as much as possible, whereas I believe in keeping old hardware useful, which, for me, it's like a spiritual connection (and the only thing that comes close to such for me as I am a fervent Atheist.)

      On another note, In my area, my electric company bills at $0.10 per kW/h. A small form factor (SFF) desktop with a 200 watt power supply, assuming that the installed components are pulling all 200 watts, it would take five hours of nonstop running for me to be billed 10 cents. For the sake of simplicity, I'll just assume a 30-day month, and in such a month, there are 720 hours (24 * 30). at 10 cents per kW/h, and 0.2 kW/h rating of the machine, the machine costs $14.40 to run non-stop for a month. While it might be better to replace it with a netbook, or a laptop, the "desktop flexibility" of PCI slots and the plethora of add-on cards in existence make the extra electricity cost worth it. Yes, this paragraph doesn't answer your question, but it's meant to help you understand the debate a little better.

    29. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by davidosteedski · · Score: 1

      going a little offtrack, but.. i LOVE mac minis, have had many, want to buy the new server and so on but- when they said the power usage was something like 13 watts, i bought a gadget and tested all my machines, under stress, with everything attached and so on. the mini used more like 30 watts, if i remember right- not even close to the 10 they were advertising. who else has run these tests?

    30. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Oh my file server most definitely is hooked to the network. Sorry for the confusion, this thread started because someone said "file servers are so last decade" and that we should hookup USB drives to our TV, which I was trying to point out was silly because of the amount of storage space I'm used to.

      Those formats are great, nice to see some progress from television manufacturers. Now when I can replace my 1080p projector with something supporting those formats I might ditch my HTPC. But even then it sure is nice to have a web browser sometimes.

    31. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The G5 towers have 600W power supplies, there's no way they could ever draw 700W.

      Sure they could - assuming 80% efficiency (which is not out of the question), a 600W power supply will draw 720W.

      That 600W is output power, not input.

    32. Re:yellow dog linux still around? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your detailed reply.

      *blush* Thanks again.

      Here in Singapore, we are billed US$0.18 per kW/h. Although I didn't do my calculations, I thought that in future, I'd run my services using netbooks and tiny boxes - just to save on air-conditioning and physical space.

      I saw their debate as a matter of "are file servers relevant today", fueled by the statement "File servers are so last century". Very unfortunately, I myself joined in the argument - very childish of me.

      Thanks again for your reply.

  3. Genius by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I speak for all of us here on Slashdot when I say, porn file server running Linux.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Genius by shacky003 · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for all of us here on Slashdot when I say, porn file server running Linux.

      (With access for the rest of us, of course...) New "Open Source" Initiative :)

    2. Re:Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I speak for all of us here on Slashdot when I say, porn file server running Linux.

      (With access for the rest of us, of course...) New "Open Source" Initiative :)

      Beats the Open Sores initiative from the group spank banks.

    3. Re:Genius by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Bonus points if you make it openly viewable, post a link in the comments to this article, AND it stays up and responsive despite the slashdot effect.

  4. Ubuntu 9.04 by Fookin · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Ubuntu 9.04 by adam.dorsey · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
  5. retire it by joe_bruin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A G5 tower is a monstrous waste of electricity with trivial performance in return compared to a modern machine. Its primary use these days is as a space heater.

    1. Re:retire it by Chaostrophy · · Score: 0

      Sad but true.

      Kiss your wind tunnel good bye.

      --
      Plato seems wrong to me today
    2. Re:retire it by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm glad somebody said it. The money you'd save on electricity in a year would probably pay for a little NAS appliance that barely takes up more space than the drive(s).

    3. Re:retire it by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Say what?! One of my older machines is a G5 dual proc, 2.7 Ghz. That's still a VERY respectable clock speed, it's 64 bit and the dual procs means it's still pretty fast. The submitter didn't mention what speed his was (I'm guessing slower) but depending on that, a G5 could very well be a useful machine. It's not like it's an Athlon or something that is both slow, 32 bit and single core.

      Since the G5 was designed for performance, it's not exactly a great file server chip though. But it's far from being a "space heater" as you say -- mine gets used every work day. As others have pointed out, either put linux on it, or put an older version of OS X on it. I still have 10.4 on mine because it was the last OS Apple produced that was streamlined for the PPC. However, now that Apple has stopped supporting it, I'll have to break down and put 10.5 on it. On other older machines though I have installed both pbbuttons and gtkpbbuttons which support a lot of of the media keys on the keyboard pretty well.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    4. Re:retire it by Swampash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed 100%. Have it recycled.

    5. Re:retire it by Rinikusu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What utter nonsense.

      I'm typing this now via my Dual G5 2.3ghz powermac that is perfectly servicable. Running OS X 10.5, as well. For web browsing, hulu, ableton live + reason + native instruments, even gaming (world of warcraft, soon to be intel only, though). Everything I want to do, I can do on this machine. Would a new machine be more efficient and even do tasks faster? Yes and probably not because I'm user constrained when it comes to music production (for the most part). however, I'd still have to part with my hard earned cash I'd rather spend on drugs and alcohol than buy another machine where I wouldn't see any 'dividends' for many years down the road.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    6. Re:retire it by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sad, but true.

      I'd use it for a practical joke, will it with cement and put it outside with a "free" sign on the side. Sit back and watch the hijinks.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    7. Re:retire it by the+linux+geek · · Score: 3, Informative

      G5's aren't incredibly slow, but nor are they particularly fast. The clock speed bump over the G4 meant the loss of some performance per cycle, and the amount of heat those things put out is obscene. A reasonably clocked C2D or any Nehalem should be vastly faster than a G5.

    8. Re:retire it by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another thing I'll point out is that debian includes binaries compiled for the ppc. I've never had any problems putting debian on ppc hardware. I would think Ubuntu would work as well, and as others have mentioned, yellow dog is still around. The days of needing a specialist distro for a ppc are long gone though.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    9. Re:retire it by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, I am using a Wind Tunnel G4 right now. It works fantastically well and is lightning fast at running satellite simulations. Faster than my Core 2 Duo PC by a fair margin.

    10. Re:retire it by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Buy a Mac mini Server

    11. Re:retire it by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I'd use it for a practical joke, will it with cement and put it outside with a "free" sign on the side. Sit back and watch the hijinks.

      Filling it with cement won't keep it from dissappearing.
      If you're serious about the lulz, you need to bolt it to an immovable object, then fill it with cement.

      Reminds me of the good old days when I superglued coins to the floor.
      It's the best entertainment you can get for a quarter.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    12. Re:retire it by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      Sad, but true.

      I'd use it for a practical joke, will it with cement and put it outside with a "free" sign on the side. Sit back and watch the hijinks.

      So that's what happened to your sex life.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:retire it by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 0

      A reasonably clocked C2D or any Nehalem should be vastly faster than a G5.

      The actual comparisons that were done when the core duo imacs were released show that isn't the case at least for core duos that were available at the same time as the G5. That is, unless you're saying that a modern processor is faster. Well, of course that's true, it's always been true for any chip, and has nothing to do with the G5 per se.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    14. Re:retire it by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So turn it on when needed, but I wouldn't say it's a waste of electricity, considering it's already paid for.

      Apple has done a great job of making XGrid platform independent. If you code with Xcode it'll speed up your compile times. If you do any video rendering, it'll speed that up.

      Or toss OS X server on it and use it as a home server (if you continue to use OS X) or Debian

    15. Re:retire it by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      Even when they were the New Hotness, I got the impression from everything I read that the G5s were huge power-sucking monstrosities. There's a reason there were no G5-based laptops, IIRC.

    16. Re:retire it by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > It's not like it's an Athlon or something that is both slow, 32 bit and single core.

      I have an Athlon XP 3200+ you insensitive clod!

      (Upgraded to an Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.6 GHz though :-) (Yes, o/c'd from the stock 3.2 Ghz on air)

    17. Re:retire it by anss123 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In those benchmarks the Core 2 was running Rosetta (a PPC emulator) so they're hardly a good measure for comparing G5 to Core 2 performance.

    18. Re:retire it by the+linux+geek · · Score: 1

      Okay, you had a high-end SMP PowerPC facing off against a laptop x86 part... running PowerPC code. Yeah. That's a fair comparison. Now, let's compare a laptop G4 to a quad Xeon from the same period with a benchmark running x86 code!

    19. Re:retire it by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The page you link to is graphs of PPC binaries being either run on a PPC machine or an Intel one(under Rosetta). Shockingly enough, PPC binaries ran rather faster on PPC. The previous page, where they benchmarked universal binaries, shows the C2D(a now not-very-exciting 1.8GHz unit) crushing the single core 1.8GHz G5 like a bug, and pulling approximate parity with a dual 2.5GHz PPC powermac, which was a firebreathing wind-tunnel of a machine.

      Back when Intel was busy pretending that the P4 could actually cut it as a laptop processor, the G4 based PPC systems were pretty cool. Reasonable punch, battery life that didn't suck. The G5s, though, where the end of the line for a reason. Not especially fast, unless you were leaning really hard on Altivec, and continually hobbled by IBM's inability to hit the clock speeds they wanted at a power envelope that wasn't nutty.

    20. Re:retire it by leenks · · Score: 1

      Stats for that?

    21. Re:retire it by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup, I was going to post the same thing. I was using one as a file server until recently, when it occurred to me to check how much power it was consuming. Christ! For the cost of running that beast a few months, I could have just bought a cheap NAS.

      Basically, yah. It's useless, sell it to some sucker, buy a cheap NAS, and move on with your life.

    22. Re:retire it by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the core 2 duo, it takes about 10 minutes for a 3-day run, on the G4 it takes about 3.5 minutes.

              Brett

    23. Re:retire it by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      Whoops! Sorry about that... I still think a G5 is useful still though.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    24. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad, but true.

      I'd use it for a practical joke, will it with cement and put it outside with a "free" sign on the side. Sit back and watch the hijinks.

      How would filling it with cement make it any heavier? Or was that not your goal?

    25. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actual comparisons that were done when the core duo imacs were released show that isn't the case at least for core duos that were available at the same time as the G5.

      That link you provided is comparing the performance of a SINGLE CORE Core Duo T2400 1.83GHz to a Dual Core G5 2.5GHz. Furthermore it is comparing them running PPC binaries. So not only is it down a processor and a slower clock but it has to translate every instruction with Rosetta on top of it.

    26. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was saying that a Core 2 Duo or Core I7 would be vastly faster than a G5. You are saying that a Core Duo (not the same as a Core 2 Duo) running software through Rosetta, is slower than the G5. Those statements are hardly contradictory. Keep in mind, the submitter is running linux, so benchmarks that use rosetta are hardly useful, informative, or relevant. Worse, they are misleading.

      To get an idea of how a G5 does against a modern processor on native apps, you can look at this site as an example:
      http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/mac-benchmarks/

    27. Re:retire it by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Now if you're really serious about hijinks, fill it with neutron star, and don't worry about bolting it to anything.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    28. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The G4 is to the G5 as the Pentium 3 is to the Pentium 4 :)

    29. Re:retire it by tyrione · · Score: 1

      G5's aren't incredibly slow, but nor are they particularly fast. The clock speed bump over the G4 meant the loss of some performance per cycle, and the amount of heat those things put out is obscene. A reasonably clocked C2D or any Nehalem should be vastly faster than a G5.

      That must have taxed your brain to come up with this comparison. I'd slap Debian Sid on it, used it for distributed compiles, LLVM builds, development and basically learning the PowerPC architecture while running Computation Fluid Dynamics, FEA, etc. When it's sufficiently pointless one can use the Case and strip out the guts and build your own custom PC.

    30. Re:retire it by sottitron · · Score: 1

      So you know how to put those 128-Bit wide Altivec registers to use, I take it?

    31. Re:retire it by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

      Are you running the PowerPC version of your software on your Core 2 Duo using Rosetta?

      --

      Michael J.
      Root, God, what is difference?
    32. Re:retire it by anss123 · · Score: 1

      Sure, the comps we have at work are likely slower than any G5 and work just fine as long as one stay away from flash heavy websites. However if I took one home it would be too noisy to use as a server, and I can't think of any other use. It pains me to throw away useful hardware, I got three working computers stashed away that will likely never see use again, but ever so often I have to face reality due to space constraints :-(

      Unlike my computers a G5 will probably be worth quite a bit in 20-30 years though.

    33. Re:retire it by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Only 3.6? Wuss.

    34. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just not true. It's virtually impossible to make my G5 tower's fans increase above idle. Only continuous high cpu usage in a hot room will trigger it, and it rarely stays on for long.

    35. Re:retire it by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      No, because the Core 2 Duo is a Windows PC.

    36. Re:retire it by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Are you running the PowerPC version of your software on your Core 2 Duo using Rosetta?

      You missed the part where he said the Core 2 Duo was a PC.

    37. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I absolutely agree. There are many uses for a G5 that are still pretty far out. Just go do some research on how much it costs to get yourself a new Mac with 16GB of memory. Now look up how cheap you can do this with a G5! That's what should be looked at for replacement cost.

    38. Re:retire it by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I am running a dual G5 Power Mac as my primary home machine. I use it for multitrack audio recording and editing, multimedia purposes, occasionally a development workstation, and a whole hell of a lot of web browsing and IMing. Electricity cost savings are not sufficient to justify a newer machine, although I am indeed drooling about a 27" iMac and hoping I can convince myself to spend the money on an appropriate storage solution and the new machine in the not too distant future. In the meantime, *whoosh*.

    39. Re:retire it by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This $299 T110 from Dell will be much faster and use less power than the G5. http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/poweredge-t110?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd

    40. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A C2D should probably be measurably faster than a similarly clocked G5, and much faster at certain tasks like h.264 encoding (although this could be a code optimization quirk).

      If it were mine, I'd install OS X 10.5, give it to my aunt, and have her browse the web with it. The combination of OS X and PowerPC processor should significantly reduce its likelihood of suffering general malware heartache, and thanks to OS X it should be absurdly simple to troubleshoot. My aunt will never encode any h.264 video, so the fact that a C2D would do so more quickly is irrelevant. The computer is in every other respect pleasantly spritely, so it's unlikely she'll ever complain about performance. I'd probably put a second hard drive in it as a mirrored RAID, which OS X supports in software out of box. I'd also probably connect an external hard drive to use as a backup destination, which should work very well since OS X also supports this more-or-less automatically out of the box.

      But that's just me.

    41. Re:retire it by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are so many reasons why that can happen though. One of the first things i think of is that your program works well with the cache line size of the G4 (32bytes, i think) whereas the Core 2 is loading up more than it needs when it loads each new cache line (256bytes, i think).
      You'll probably find if you make even the slightest changes to the data structure size or alignment in the program the benchmarks will switch around.

      In the end CPUs have to be general and there is no doubt that in general the current x86s are faster. If you find the G4 is faster for you well then i say keep using it. It's an exceptional circumstance that you happen to have where your code closely matches the design of the G4.

    42. Re:retire it by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Good luck trying to walk away from it once you fill it!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    43. Re:retire it by Mr_eX9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The real fun is when they take it home and turn it on--the CPUs will melt the cement!

    44. Re:retire it by tangent · · Score: 1

      Sure, it'll suck down a lot of power, which is why I don't use mine as a server. I use it as a secondary desktop, so it can sleep most of the day away. It's absolutely fine for that. Only use that G5 as a server if you can actually keep the thing busy most of the time.

    45. Re:retire it by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Put them on Freecycle. Just because you don't have a use for them doesn't mean someone else can't find one. I've found even broken PCs get snatched up pretty quick on Freecycle by the DIYers, so instead of making more E-Waste put it on Freecycle where someone will give it a good home.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    46. Re:retire it by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      You're right that for integer performance, the G5 was just so-so, and its memory latency compounded that, making the overall OS responsiveness an absolute dog compared with the Intel-based Macs. So for most normal day-to-day use, the newer machines seem a lot faster.

      That said, for audio recording purposes, the later G5 models can still hold their own pretty well against the current crop of Intel-based Macs. If I'm remembering the benchmarks correctly, the current model (or possibly the last model) of the eight-core Mac Pro is the first Intel-based Mac that can keep up with the quad G5 in floating-point performance. When you consider that the quad G5 is a five-year-old machine with half as many cores, I think that's pretty darn impressive even if it is drawing twice the wattage.

      I'd still kill to have seen a Power7 in a Mac OS X-based server box. What GHz barrier? 4.14 GHz, 16 core, baby. Makes the i7 look like a children's toy. Also uses as much power as a city block, of course, but it would be worth having to rewire my house with a 20 amp circuit just to watch the brownout. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    47. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      exactly, i have a G4 MDD dual 1ghz now THAT is a wind tunnel! But for a machine that's almost 7 years old it's still performing fine. I use it to run NI B4 Hammond organ emulator - using the onboard sound - i had to buy a Creative Audigy 2 to run the same app on a PC. And I'm running Leopard, which actually feels quicker than Tiger that I had on it before.

    48. Re:retire it by Eudial · · Score: 1

      Electric heating is a terrible waste of energy. I'd suggest using it as a door stop, or an anchor for a small boat instead.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    49. Re:retire it by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Some good reading here on what people are doing with these machines. http://emulators.com/docs/nx32_powerpc_g5.htm For the most part you can still run all the modern OS X software you want, just not Snow Leopard (10.6).

    50. Re:retire it by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Of course. And I am certainly not claiming the absurd notion that the G4 is a better processor, or generically faster. I haven't spent a lot of effort to figure out why other than Altivec. On MATLAB benchmarks, which is a little more legitimate test, with nothing else running aside from the OS in both cases, the calculations benchmarks are faster on the Dual G4 than the Core 2 Duo machine, but the graphics are much, much slower to the point the overall benchmark rating is at the dead bottom of the list. I actually don't care that much, I can do massively parallel processing by running the PC, the G4, and the Sun workstation via Exceed on the PC, all at the same time. I don't get 3x the pay, however.

                My point was, however, that the thing is hardly the paperweight slug that everybody was suggesting. And that's a G4 - that we bought about a month ago, I might add! Still need Classic for other things. And, until about a month ago we were using an 8600/300, which was no speed demon but adequate to the task. The only reason we aren't still using it is that I had to run 10.xxx to be allowed to connect it to the PC network, and the hard drive was too small to contain the OS. It was cheaper to get a $200 G4 MDD than it was a copy of OS10.4 and a hard drive.

                I went and checked the various G5 models and those calling for it to be recycled are loonies. We are talking ~$500 worth of machine there, maybe a lot more for the higher-zoot version.

    51. Re:retire it by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Bah, the GP would get a better performance boost by increasing the CPU NB Multiplier to 12x (2400) or 13x (2600) from the stock 10x (2000). Increasing the CPU NB voltage, as opposed to the NB VID from 1.1V to somewhere between 1.2V to 1.3 V is usually necessary.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    52. Re:retire it by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Jjust adecdotal, but my core 2 duo (slowest new MBP) runs handbrake dozens and dozens of times faster than my 2003 g4 PowerBook 1Ghz. Sometimes, it transcodes about a hundred more fps. I knew it was time for a new machine.

    53. Re:retire it by jddj · · Score: 1

      Sad to say, I agree. Get a Sheevaplug (from someone other than the quite unresponsive Global Scale Technologies), a USB disk that spins down and do a file server that draws about 6 watts.

      If you've got software to do productive work on it, you could donate it to World Computer Exchange or freecycle it locally for even less carbon debt - either of these options would give someone less fortunate a hand.

    54. Re:retire it by peas_n_carrots · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're parting with your hard earned cash by keeping that G5 running. Your higher electricity costs would probably pay for a new, power efficient system in a year or two. Just admit the fanboism and we can settle the debate.

    55. Re:retire it by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

      The G4 is to the G5 as the Pentium 3 is to the Pentium 4 :)</p></quote>

      Sorry, but i just don't get it... do you mean that the G4 is 1) clocked slower, 2) having a superior, more efficient architecture, 3) don't use as much energy compared with G5?

    56. Re:retire it by jriskin · · Score: 1

      I'd love to do exactly that with my G5, but i'm dragging my feet because there are two choices:
      1. Configure a generic linux box and spend ?? hours getting to work just right
      OR
      2. Get an off the shelf NAS with mediocre performance.

      I'd love to get a cheap NAS that will actually go close the full disk speed over gig-e. But the reality is most are really slow. 10-30MB/sec piles of junk...
      In the end I'll find the time and do #1...

    57. Re:retire it by adolf · · Score: 1

      Remember, the G5 already exists. It is, therefore, free. And it may be quite fast enough for the non-specified purpose that the asker was asking about.

      Meanwhile, the Dell box (while probably faster) is not free.

      How long does it take the power savings of a $300 Dell T110 to break even?

    58. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      Just keep the G5 as a historical curiosity. Turn it on for your friends at dinner parties.

    59. Re:retire it by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Say what?! One of my older machines is a G5 dual proc, 2.7 Ghz. That's still a VERY respectable clock speed, it's 64 bit and the dual procs means it's still pretty fast

      Actually, it doesn't... Geekbench scores the dual 2.7Ghz one around 2200, and even the Quad 2.5Ghz one around 3400... This compares to a current bottom of the range MacMini which scores about 4000. So basically, you have a machine that's idling at 150W and uses 700W under load, that's slower than the current cheapest machine that apple sells, which uses 10W idle and 80W under load.

      Note, 1W costs about $1 per year, so the price of running the G5 idle will pay for a MacMini in 4 years, or under load, will pay for it in 1 year.

    60. Re:retire it by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Consider that a bottom of the line MacMini is faster than your G5, and consumes 140W less power when idle, and 600W less power when under load. If you're not using your G5 much, you'll pay for the MacMini in 4 years by trashing the G5 now, if you *are* using it (and it sounds like you are), you'll pay for the MacMini in only 1 year.

    61. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to agree, but I do.

      I'm in the same boat as the submitter -- a year or so ago I upgraded from my G5 Tower to a shiny new Mac Pro. I installed OpenSUSE on the G5 to play around (the install was a little tweaky, but in the end it worked FWIW), but it really is hard to justify the power usage of that thing. It's been sitting unused for the last 6 months or so. I should finally just craigslist the damn thing.

    62. Re:retire it by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Actually, a quick check on Geekbench says the top quad core 2.5Ghz G5 scores about 3400, while a bottom of the line current MacMini scores 4000. Your benchmarks were done comparing a G5 running a PPC task to a CoreDuo running a PPC task in an emulator.

    63. Re:retire it by gdshaw · · Score: 1

      If you're only using a machine for a few hours a day then that's a very reasonable attitude to take, both economically and environmentally. When you're contemplating use as a server (which will presumably run 24/7) the electricity bills stack up much more quickly. The cost won't necessarily be obvious, because it will be mixed in with the rest of your usage, but it will be significant. Back of the envelope calculation: assuming 150W average that would be about 1300kWh per year, costing about GBP 180 (USD 270) where I live. Depending on your circumstances, noise and heat generation may also be factors.

    64. Re:retire it by Movi · · Score: 1

      4) all of the above

    65. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what?! .... It's not like it's an Athlon or something that is both slow, 32 bit and single core.

      Oi. I'm still using an home built overclocked Athlon XP 2600 @ 2.175Ghz. It's got a 3GB (maxed out :( ), 512MB Nvidia 7600GT, mirrored Raid and runs Windows XP and Ubuntu and is brilliant for surfing the web, software development, older games and importantly a guaranteed secondary backup system to my NAS.

      Don't throw away older machines because somebody says they're out of date, use them until they die of old age. Mine's been going since 2004, had a replacement PSU, upgraded RAM and AGP card, a replacement disk in the RAID array and a replacement DVD RW drive (the original actually broke). Total cost over the 6 years was ~£700-800 (~$1200-$1300), I only got a replacement main laptop with 4GB and a 3Ghz Core i5 this year and bless my old computer it's still going strong I just can't play the newer games on it.

    66. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, fit a PC inside it! Here's how: http://www.overclockers.com/how-i-pcd-an-apple-g5/

    67. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? The electricity is already paid for?

      point
      -------
      your head

    68. Re:retire it by tubegeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just got a little PogoPlug device (Seagate DockStar) off of Woot! for less than $50 shipped, 4 USB ports (for external drives) & 1 Ethernet port, hackable (so I read) - kind of a no brainer. Going to replace a small tower for my BitTorrent serving if I can get it set up right. It'll do file serving right out of the box, both to my LAN and also facing the Internet. Some folks on Woot! were saying Office Depot has had this as a promotion for ONE dollar.

    69. Re:retire it by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I am running a dual G5

      There's still lots of life in my G5 Mac Pro. Hell, there's still life in my dual G4 tower.

      I use the G5 every single day in my home recording studio. I also teach digital music production, and the G4 running Logic Audio Platinum is a great machine for my students. No, it doesn't run all the latest and greatest plug-ins, but with a Hammerfall audio card or ancient Digidesign Digi-001 you can still produce music that's good enough to release commercially. And that license for LAP (with the dongle!) was not cheap.

      The Mac Pro has been a mainstay production machine for me since it came out. Only recently have I built my own i7/ socket 1366 machine to replace it, and only because Cockos Reaper has become my favorite DAW application and the i7 is a more powerful machine than the Mac Pro for a little more than 1/2 the price. And, for media production, the gap between OSX and other platforms has been drastically narrowed.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    70. Re:retire it by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Two obsolete processors, one older than the other?

    71. Re:retire it by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Assuming 225 watts for the G5 and 90 watts for the T110 and 10 cents per kwh you would save about 30 cents per day. More in areas with higher power rates. A large portion of the cost of the T110 could be covered by the selling of the G5. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.info.apple.com%2Farticle.html%3Fartnum%3D32486&ei=5epKTLfyK4H48AbemK00&usg=AFQjCNHwaVdoqoKnWrar1u0GzHDttwedbA

    72. Re:retire it by otuz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it depends on the model and how much you load it and how many cards you have installed.

      If it's a Single-1.8GHz 2004 model, it'll use 120W idle, 160W max and 552W fully-loaded max.
      If it's a Dual-2.5GHz 2004 model, it'll use 120W idle, 406W max and 604W fully-loaded max.
      If it's a Dual-2.3GHz 2005 model, it'll use 165W idle, 450W max.
      If it's a Quad-2.5GHz 2005 model, it'll use 185W idle, 550W max.

      The PSU itself is rated 600W and the fully-loaded means the most power-hungry pci-cards imaginable installed in all slots.

      The performance per watt is comparable to other performance-oriented machines of the era; Athlon64's / Opterons and Intel P4's / Xeons.

      Here are some benchmark scores to compare with other macs: http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/mac-benchmarks/

      A PowerMac G5 could be perfectly fine as a desktop machine running OSX 10.4, 10.5 or a linux distro. The power consumption isn't such a big issue, if the machine is put into sleep mode or shut down when not used.

    73. Re:retire it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That, and he doesn't know how to put those 128-bit wide SSE registers to use. AltiVec code on the G4 versus x87 code on the PC is likely to have those performance characteristics. He said the PC was running Windows, which probably means that the compiler defaults to targeting i386. If you compile with gcc / clang on the Mac, you get much better performance with the default options than any Windows compiler, because the oldest CPU that OS X/Intel programs have to support has SSE, while the oldest CPUs Windows supports don't even have MMX. If he has the code, tweaking some compiler flags on the PC can make a huge difference in performance.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    74. Re:retire it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That is comparing Core Duo, which is basically a dual-core Pentium M with the G5. The Core 2 was the first to use the new microarchitecture, and is a lot faster. It's also comparing the applications running natively on the G5 to running in a PowerPC emulator on the Core Duo! The fact that they were even remotely usable in the emulator is impressive.

      Finally, it ignores the power consumption. The dual processor G5 towers used up to 604W. That's almost ten times what my G4 PowerBook could draw (and it included a screen!), and seven times what my C2D MacBook Pro can draw. In terms of performance per Watt, the G5 is terrible.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    75. Re:retire it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's free to own, but not free to use. It will use up to 604W, idling at 120W. A modern PC of similar performance will use closer 20-100W. All the time that you are fully using the G5, it will be consuming half a kilowatt more than the modern machine. If you're in the US, that works out at about five cents per hour of use more. If you use it for three hours a day, that's around $60/year at the average US residential electricity price. That works out at five years to break even on the new machine if you are using it for three hours a day. If you live somewhere where electricity costs more, or use it more, then it works out to more. If the machine is on and idle, that also makes a difference.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    76. Re:retire it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I just did the calculation in another post, and if he lives in the US then he's probably only paying $60/year more to keep that machine running than he would a newer machine. If you can get a new machine that's faster and more power efficient than a G5 for $120, please let me know where...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    77. Re:retire it by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      In that case, it should be sold and the money used to buy a new, cheap, barebones system that will use significantly less energy and still accomplish his goals of having a file server or backup computer system. It is one thing if the old hardware is still a primary/production system and the user doesn't want to spend the time/effort/money to modernize. Quite another when talking about using inefficient old hardware for some ancillary task without taking into account the total cost of operation. A 100 watt difference in power use when accumulated 24/7/365 is about $175/year at 20c total cost per killowatt/hour.

    78. Re:retire it by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      Or toss OS X server on it and use it as a home server

      Just curious: Have you actually used OS X Server?

    79. Re:retire it by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Yes I have. And for people that don't want to mess with command line stuff, it's a decent GUI to numerous open source projects LDAP, DarwinStreamingServer, Apache, etc.

    80. Re:retire it by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      What parts of it do you actually use? I've had no luck with it at all.

      I manage a couple of OS X Servers for two different offices of about 4-8 workstations each (nothing fancy), and I can't recommend it to anybody, ever. It just spontaneously breaks for no reason if we don't reboot it on a regular basis, and there are many documented features (PPTP VPN, mailing lists, and email virtual domains, to name a few) that just don't work out of the box.

      If something does work out of the box, OS X updates break it. The wiki server just stopped authenticating some users after the 10.6.4 upgrade. Solution? Dig around on the Apple forums, where on the second or third page of a long discussion, somebody mentions that you have to shut down the wiki server, delete some index file, and start it up again. WTF?

      In other words, I end up having to mess with command line stuff that's much more obscure and poorly documented than anything on a decent Linux distro. Also, it makes me look like an incompetent buffoon, because everyone "knows" that Apple stuff doesn't break.

      And it's not the hardware. I've observed the same behaviour across different hardware, with different installation media, on different networks, across both 10.5 and 10.6.

    81. Re:retire it by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      PC stands for "personal computer" not "personal computer running Windows".

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    82. Re:retire it by peas_n_carrots · · Score: 1

      Might want to check your math. Of course any calculation will have to make certain assumptions so results will vary.

      The OP said one of his uses could be as a file server. 24/7 = 8760 hrs/yr. Assuming the G5 sucks down 200W vs a power-efficient 60W file server PC which is reasonable by today's standards, that's a 140W difference. That's 1226.4 kWh of wasted electricity. At 10c/W, just to keep the math simple, he's paying an extra $122.64 in utility bills per yr. If he were very savvy & frugal, he might be able to put together a system for that much. Definitely $245 over 2 yrs would easily pay for such a system.

    83. Re:retire it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > PC stands for "personal computer" not "personal computer running Windows".

      Don't be obtuse. In common parlance, PC is short for "IBM-PC compatible."

      Macs are rarely if ever called PCs!

    84. Re:retire it by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Buy a Mac mini Server

      For what you would over-spend on that you could get a PC tower and a whole mess of 2TB disks.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    85. Re:retire it by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there is not yet the perfect NAS device.

      They all seem to be made by people fixating on Windows.

      So anything more interesting and you will be better off rolling your own.

      If it would be worth the money to spend (if there were a suitable and pricey option) then it's worth the time to spend.

      This is another hole in the Apple hardware lineup.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    86. Re:retire it by Macrat · · Score: 1

      For what you would over-spend on that you could get a PC tower and a whole mess of 2TB disks.

      That's a mess alright.

    87. Re:retire it by micheas · · Score: 1

      Remember, the G5 already exists. It is, therefore, free. And it may be quite fast enough for the non-specified purpose that the asker was asking about.

      Meanwhile, the Dell box (while probably faster) is not free.

      How long does it take the power savings of a $300 Dell T110 to break even?

      Depends on your power source and electricity costs.

      For most people probably about 24 months.

    88. Re:retire it by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

      2.5 years.

    89. Re:retire it by thogard · · Score: 1

      In many parts of the world, 1 watt = $1 per year if left on 24x7.

    90. Re:retire it by thogard · · Score: 1

      Power 7 is up to 5.2 GHz now in 4 core chips and you can put 6 of them in a tightly coupled system.
      That would make a very nice x-server. It seems to me that Apple seems to have far more bugs now that they stopped supporting the PPC platform. I'm guessing they used to find lots of bugs that they aren't seeing now.

    91. Re:retire it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I just did the calculation in another post, and if he lives in the US then he's probably only paying $60/year more

      Some people in this country pay twice as much for power as other people in this country. Some of us live in California, you insensitive clod!

      Let's not forget that most power comes from coal and oil in this country. How many more tumors does that alleged $60/year come out to?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    92. Re:retire it by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      My bet is on Altivec. If the app does large amounts of vector calcs and is optimized for both Altivec and SSE3/SSE4, Altivec still wins despite being half a decade older.

      Even if the Core2's loading much more than it needs, it's also got probably to 6x more memory bandwidth than the G4 does and probably around 4x more cache.
      In order to have the cache line size affect things, the program would need to load a wasteful chunk of data and not use it for long time. For something like that, I'm still not sure we'd end up with a factor of two difference in favor of a computer with quarter of the general computing power.

      I kinda wished that Freescale would have been faster on working on the dual core e600s. If Apple had adopted those as a 2nd option, it would have been pretty nice laptop option. Basically they would have been dual core G4s with 2MB cache and DDR2 and a much faster memory bus. On paper, similar to a Core Duo. The difference is that it'd be faster in general than the Core Duo, and use less power since the northbridge was integrated and the whole package barely cost a few watts over just a Core Duo.

    93. Re:retire it by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      I've used OSX Server on the side at work (I'm NOT a sysadmin).

      OSX Server 10.3 very stable. Very old. But very stable. We kinda left a machine there in an automation lab and forgot about maintaining it. It was still working fine with a uptime of over 3 years when we did the "oh, what's this.....I remember now..." I kept providing for the network, so that was good.

      OSX Server 10.4 pretty darn stable. Less stable than 10.3. Samba would sometimes give out. LDAP had some quirkyness. We just stopped using it when that happened.
      Uptime was in the range of 6 months since we still applied security updates.

      OSX Server 10.5 is shit. Uptimes around the order of 1-2 months forced by a necessary reboot when something dies or the machine just slows down with no explanation.

    94. Re:retire it by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      Ah. That explains it. I only started using it since 10.5, and 10.6 isn't much better.

    95. Re:retire it by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Well it IS on a stock HSF. And you know how crap those are.

      I didn't feel like spending $30 on a good CPU cooler. I'll pick up a cheap water cooler late this year $70 and easily push 4+ GHz.

  6. G5s are power hogs by sith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unless you just like the look of the G5, I think you'd be better off trying to get a little money for it on craigslist, and then buying/building a cheap x86 machine if you need a server. G5 power consumption is pretty crazy for the performance you get - best case, at idle, you're looking at 140w, but in reality it's much higher.

    1. Re:G5s are power hogs by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative

      That Is The Correct Answer.

      You can get a nettop for about $200 that will have as much storage. It will be fast enough and be x86 so give you a wide choice of distros and with the correct choice of GPU will do hardware accelerated 1080p. Finally it will be a fraction of the size and consume 20 watts.

      You're doing no-one other than your power company a favor by resurrecting the G5 tower.

    2. Re:G5s are power hogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I see comments like this saying that a nettop will be faster than a G5, it becomes painfully obvious to me how many people around here have never touched a G5. Even the highest end Atom can't hold a candle to the lowliest G5 proc.

    3. Re:G5s are power hogs by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      That Is The Correct Answer... You're doing no-one other than your power company a favor by resurrecting the G5 tower.

      ...until the guy who buys it asks the same question. Heh.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:G5s are power hogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean as much storage? I've got 2TB internal on my G5 (dual 1.8GHZ... one of the old ones ) , and 8GB of ram.

      It's an excellent dev machine ( and up untul the latest iPhone SDK you could hack Xcode to install peroperly on it ) and as general purpose machine...
      it does choke on video higher than 720p though. ( and of course anythign HD in flash... flash's POS programming is so obvious when you have a low end machine )

      So anyway... yes I think it's at its end, but if they guy just wants a file server or a general purpose machine ,it will rock.. especially the aircooled older G5's... there's nothing to go wrong on the thing.

    5. Re:G5s are power hogs by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have said 'can have as much', but 2GB is easy to add. 750GB and 1TB 2.5" drives are readily available. Anything else can be added externally. At least one of my nettops has an e-sata port so external drives can be added with a high speed connection.

    6. Re:G5s are power hogs by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      That Is The Correct Answer.

      You can get a nettop for about $200 that will have as much storage. It will be fast enough and be x86 so give you a wide choice of distros and with the correct choice of GPU will do hardware accelerated 1080p. Finally it will be a fraction of the size and consume 20 watts.

      You're doing no-one other than your power company a favor by resurrecting the G5 tower.

      Well, you could tape a few nettops inside!

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    7. Re:G5s are power hogs by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 1

      Time to undervolt!

      --
      "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
    8. Re:G5s are power hogs by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Please point out exactly where he said that a nettop is faster than a G5...

      --
      No sig today...
  7. ubuntu? or just rsync? by v1 · · Score: 1

    I've seen ubuntu on numerous triple-boot (os x / linux / windows) macbook pros. that's intel though. I don't know how good the open firmware boot selectors are (as opposed to RebelEFI) nor how good ubuntu drivers are for powerpc. But worth looking into.

    I have yet to run into a redhat installation on a mac. (referring to the article tag as such)

    I used a PMG5 for quite some time as a backup server (rsync) running OS X 10.4 Works very well for that, had lots of attached storage. FW800 FTW. But that got replaced this spring with a used Mac pro - quad 3.0 can be had on ebay for $1500, was well worth it and a welcome update.

    Just keep in mind it's an aging machine. Macs in general tend to continue running well beyond their useful life, in terms of processor speed and ram ceiling. At some point you have to listen to the voice of reason when someone says "it's OLD, time to REPLACE it", when you want to reply "but it still WORKS FINE".

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  8. Put a distillery inside it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then brew yourself up something nice.

  9. rsync with opensuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can turn it into a backup server (see rsync as a option).

    and opensuse worked well on a old mac i had

    but research into some different options

  10. What shall we do with a G5 tower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slap him around and call him Suzie, early in the morning.

  11. Old Games by painandgreed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm keeping mine around to run games on, especially old classic games that have stopped working under newer versions of OS X or Intel chips. In addition to that, it might go to my photo studio as a browser and photo editing machine.

    1. Re:Old Games by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Haha, now come on, what do you really use it for? Everyone knows there were never any Mac games and you had to buy a Wintel machine.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    2. Re:Old Games by painandgreed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Marathon... ...and Alpha Centauri: Alien Crossfire

    3. Re:Old Games by EricX2 · · Score: 1

      The reason to keep an OLD MAC is to play games? That's like keeping an old Windows computer to be more secure. :)

    4. Re:Old Games by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Marathon was open sourced a while ago and runs very well on... well, pretty much anything these days (including my Intel Mac), so it's not a great example.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Old Games by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Marathon was open sourced a while ago and runs very well on... well, pretty much anything these days (including my Intel Mac), so it's not a great example.

      Ok, you caught me. I actually am a Mac fan and have a collection of old hardware from a 128 k Mac (used to play Lunar Rescue actually) all the way up to present. I could use the open source Marathon, but then I wouldn't be using the original media on the original hardware, and that's what counts to weirdos like me. I have old versions of Sim City (B&W and color), the Ancient Art of War, the entire Warlords series, etc. I've been a Mac fan since 1985 and like running the old hardware like car fanatics like working and driving old cars. Sure, they could get a kit car that looks like the old car and probably runs better, but that wouldn't be fun would it?

    6. Re:Old Games by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      How about, Shogo MAD, Quake, Unreal, Klingon Honor Guard, Shadow Warrior, Max Payne, Undying, Halo, Star Trek Elite Force, Rune, Jedi Academy, Jedi Knight II Ourcast, Aliens V Predator, Carmageddon, Nanosaur to name a few. True, there have never been as many games available for the Mac as for the Windows PC, but really, anything to avoid the horror of Windows.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  12. Ooo, ooo, pick me. by Spazntwich · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Use it as supposed motivation for a contrived AskSlashdot entry where you spin a tragic tale of brain injury that finds you without ability to use Google or your own creative faculties to come up with a use for hardware that, while eliciting a strong emotional response from some of the community's more lonely members, is likely less valuable than the electricity you will spend running it for a year.

    1. Re:Ooo, ooo, pick me. by shadowolfe · · Score: 1

      Then, with the supposed brain-trauma-induced-contrived-question, have someone followup with a negatively charged post about how you shouldn't seek advice from others because Google is clearly superior to the opinions of others. Then be shocked and horrified at the realization that there are mean people on the internet, even dear Slashdot, who are about as constructive monkey feces! I offer my following suggestion to the large, grey, heavy stone like thing: Catapult.

  13. Like the look of the G5 ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Unless you just like the look of the G5 ...

    If its being kept around just for the look then gut it and put a PC motherboard inside? From what I heard it may take a little more than a phillips screwdriver to accomplish this.

    1. Re:Like the look of the G5 ... by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      it may take a little more than a phillips screwdriver to accomplish this.

      Yup, you'll need a Torx driver instead.

    2. Re:Like the look of the G5 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you up if I could. I did this with an original single 1.6 G5. The case makes for an excellent gaming machine. Cooling is no problem, and it looks nice as well. My only complaint was the backplane is a little small if you plan to run multiple cards, but it isn't too difficult to cut out and make a new one.
      The end result is a pretty, simple, and efficient gaming machine that will satisfy the more basic modding instincts without lowering yourself to the all-too-common EL wire and LEDs everywhere.
      I did this with an old sawtooth G4 case as well some years ago, pre-Intel Mac days... The built-in handles made for a great LAN machine, and running Windows on it drew some attention. Space and cooling are much less optimal in the G4, however.

    3. Re:Like the look of the G5 ... by Tycho · · Score: 1

      it may take a little more than a phillips screwdriver to accomplish this.

      Yup, you'll need a Torx driver instead.

      That doesn't sound too bad, Apple has done worse than that before. Torx drivers can be found with ease in the US.

      Even if it is just a Phillips screw Apple's managed to screw(heh, heh) things up by using #5-40 screws. Screws of that particular size and threading seem to be nonexistent at all of the local hardware stores where I live in the US.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  14. I'm in the exact same position... by Roogna · · Score: 1

    And my current plans are to strip the case and stick a updated system in.

    1. Re:I'm in the exact same position... by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      I'm in the exact same position...
      And my current plans are to strip the case and stick [in] an updated system.

      This is why I read slashdot. :-)

      For my old G5 2GHz I'm thinking about keeping it around--though offline--in case there are any PCI/PCI-X cards I need to interface with. This happens often to people who do audio work, or people who have to migrate very old equipment to something newer; basically, it's there if you need a broker computer to bridge a generation gap. The G5's power per computation efficiency is terrible for any practical task.

  15. Recycle and earn some cash by russg · · Score: 1

    Recycle the metals and earn some cash toward a some sort of replacement.

  16. Which OS has best support for the box? by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.x). A group at work still uses a "cluster" of these for Final Cut rendering.
    I'm not sure about the Mac Pros, but I know that a lot of hardware support is missing in Linux for the iMacs, including (especially) temperature gauges for fan control.

    1. Re:Which OS has best support for the box? by tibit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Adding to benefits of OS X 10.5: a lot of good open source is available from MacPorts. Heck, MacPorts still doesn't run a lot of things under Snow Leopard (wxWindows, native gimp, ...). So your results with MacPorts under OS X 10.5 running on G5 may well be better than with 10.6 running on Intel hardware!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  17. Audio Workstation/Recording Studio by dangitman · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you have the model with the PCI-X, rather than the PCI Express bus, then probably the optimum usage is putting it in a recording studio. There are some great rack-mount multi-channel (like 10 in, 10 out) audio interfaces by the likes of M-Audio which use the PCI bus, and have never been updated for PCI Express compatibility, so they won't work in a Mac Pro.

    The G5 has plenty of performance for audio work, and plenty of space for internal hard drives or RAID. This would really be the optimum niche for such a machine. For other purposes (file server etc), it sucks too much power and takes up too much space for its usefulness. But for audio work with dedicated hardware, it's perfect.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Audio Workstation/Recording Studio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless it's water cooled, the g5s are way too loud for a recording studio. Unless you want to run tons of cable extenders into another room or iso box.

    2. Re:Audio Workstation/Recording Studio by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Who runs any fan-cooled computer in the actual recording area? Standard practice is that the recording area is isolated from the mixing/equipment room.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Audio Workstation/Recording Studio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, because it's not important at all for things to be quiet in the mixing room.

    4. Re:Audio Workstation/Recording Studio by jewishbaconzombies · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bingo.

      I had the bottom of the line G5 for a time and had 2 other computers that had replaced it. Between Berkley and Emeryville, there were several studios and colleges for advanced audio. I think I got about 60-75% of what I paid for it. They didn't even haggle (and I priced a bit high for haggleability).

    5. Re:Audio Workstation/Recording Studio by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      It's not that important for things to be quiet in the area where the mixing is done. But you certainly don't want the extraneous sounds of fans etc. in the recording area. But why would the computer be in the recording area anyway? I can't see where anyone said that on this thread...

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  18. Perfect use for a G5. by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wipe the drives, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/whatever works.

    Then turn it off

    Then say 'its the new replacement for timothy and kdawson. They are now new and improved and no longer post stupid shit like a question that should have been asked on some random forum somewhere rather than on a site with a title of 'News for nerds'.

    Listen, its not 'help for newbies'. Its not 'your personal place to question people with an actual clue'.

    In reality though, just throw it away. You'll spend more in electricity in the next year than if you bought a brand new Atom PC that will whip its ass. G5s are horrible power hogs compared to current chips.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Perfect use for a G5. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you're a bit of an arsehole, eh? Your last three sentences would have sufficed, i think.

    2. Re:Perfect use for a G5. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wipe the drives, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/whatever works.

      Then turn it off

      Then say 'its the new replacement for timothy and kdawson. They are now new and improved and no longer post stupid shit like a question that should have been asked on some random forum somewhere rather than on a site with a title of 'News for nerds'.

      Listen, its not 'help for newbies'. Its not 'your personal place to question people with an actual clue'.

      In reality though, just throw it away. You'll spend more in electricity in the next year than if you bought a brand new Atom PC that will whip its ass. G5s are horrible power hogs compared to current chips.

      http://ask.slashdot.org

    3. Re:Perfect use for a G5. by trapnest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're an idiot if you really believe an Atom will out preform a G5 processor.

  19. Convert it into by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - an aquarium
    - a terrarium
    - a planter pot
    - a lamp
    - a gift-box
    - a key - safe
    - a modern PC by replacing the hardware
    - a piece of art devoid of any specific use
    - a jarring piece of art to tell people about the vanity of luxury consumer electronics ...any of these is better than to put it to any use as a computer in this day and age.
    You could also sell it to someone, and buy proper file-server grade hardware from the money you gain.
    Or donate it to a struggling artist.

    You could even use it as a base to box-mod your console of choice!

  20. I just recycled one of these :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looked very closely at the capabilities of it, decided it wasn't worth my time.
    Recycling seemed like a good use of it.

  21. Debian by dandart · · Score: 5, Informative

    Debian's PPC port works well, I used it on an iMac G3.

  22. What To Do With an Old G5 Tower? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    (singing): "Put 'im in the bilge and make 'im drink it, Ear-lye in the morning!"

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:What To Do With an Old G5 Tower? by reverendbeer · · Score: 1

      Shove it in the hold with the captains daughter...

    2. Re:What To Do With an Old G5 Tower? by bragr · · Score: 1

      Make 'im shave with a rusty razor...

    3. Re:What To Do With an Old G5 Tower? by Me!+Me!+42 · · Score: 1

      As I learned it, it was,
      "Shave his belly with a rusty razor . . . "

      Regarding the G5 though, just load Leopard on it. My old G4 running Leopard works quite well as a sit down computer. Admittedly though, recycling it and getting a new one is probably the best solution when you consider performance and energy use. I'll probably do that in the next year or so myself.

      --
      -- My apologies if the above facts contain any opinions, or vice versa! --
    4. Re:What To Do With an Old G5 Tower? by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      Wow.. extra points for the Poxy Boggards references!

    5. Re:What To Do With an Old G5 Tower? by lunatic1969 · · Score: 1

      I've actually got one of the new iMacs. I also have an unbuntu box and a couple of lap tops. Just in the interest of full disclosure. :) Getting rid of it actually had crossed my mind, but for what little I'd get for it, it'd suit me better to keep it around.

  23. I have Ubuntu 10.04.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...running on a lowly 1.25GHz PPC mini, and it is a really nice setup.

  24. Debian or Recycle it by dondelelcaro · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can rather easily run Debian on the thing with support for all of the non-architecture specific packages that you'd find on an equivalent machine running another architecture; I had quite a few of them around at one point.

    That said, you really should strongly consider not running the machine unless you have a very specific use for it; there are many lower powered machines which won't waste as much eneergy and will provide equivalent functionality.

    --
    http://www.donarmstrong.com
  25. Re:Simple. by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good use for it would be a LART to use against snobby PC bigots.

    Drop it on a certain Anonymous Coward who insists on complaining about the perfectly rational, excellent, and even superior decision made in the past to buy an Apple computer.

  26. Media Center/File Server by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a dual 2.0GHz (the one with PCI-X instead of PCI-e) that I threw two giant HDDs in and turned it into a file server (time machine backup server) as well as a media center for my PS3 and 360. I rip my movies to that HDD and watch them via the uPnP stuff on my game consoles (when the mood strikes me.) It's great for storing music collections, backups and other fun items. :) Be a digital packrat.

    I still have Leopard on it, but that's just because it was the last OS I used before I re-purposed it. I could stick ubuntu on it later on, but there's nothing pressing me to do so just yet (I will eventually, I suspect.) It still sits in the cubbyhole of my super-cheap computer desk in my office, and I use the front USB port if I ever need to reboot it or anything (it's got an insane uptime...) heh. I use screen sharing in OSX to connect to it using my Mini or MBP. It serves up itunes to all my Macs (and mp3s/etc to my PS3/360)without any fuss or overly spastic noise. :) Well no more noise than any other tower PC I've had.

    --
    It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  27. Sell It by byronblue · · Score: 1

    Some poor sap will buy it for more than it's worth. The mafia might even purchase it as a concrete shoes replacement. The handles make it easier to lug around.

    1. Re:Sell it by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      "You'd be surprised what an older G5 desktop sells for on the used market. Any software dev that supports PowerPC apps needs testing machines, and dev boxes. Faster PowerPCs like G5s are in demand out there."

      Honestly, as a Mac dev, I can tell you that not many of us test on PowerPC any more... I have a PowerPC machine at home for that purpose, but I don't think I've even once used it. At work, we just decommissioned our last PowerPC's (cept for the one at my desk that we basically keep around as a file server because it contains a bunch of our old projects.) The latest version of XCode won't run on the PowerPC, nor will the latest version of OS X.

      The newest PowerPC Mac is what... close to 5 years old at this point? Most of us have just given up, unless it's a dead simple app that can recompile without any modifications to PowerPC, and only requires 10.5. And most developers wouldn't even test at that point....

    2. Re:Sell it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last August, before Snow Leopard came out, I sold my old G5 for $500.00 to someone who had a specific use for it like Teese mentions.

      Sold a few other things I had just collecting dust and bought a Macbook that someone had returned after a day.

  28. Two options... by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it's a run-of-the-mill air-cooled model, just sell it. I just sold mine for $200 direct to someone (who I found on here, actually), but on eBay they were going for around $250 when I looked. Put the money toward buying/building a smaller, less power-hungry box if you're looking for something to do server duty. The person who pays your electric bill will thank you.

    If, on the other hand, it's one of the liquid-cooled models, keep it and definitely use it for something suggested in this discussion, but make sure you keep good backups-- Eventually it will develop a catastrophic coolant leak which will destroy it, and if you take it to an Apple Store they might just give you a free Mac Pro.

    ~Philly

  29. Stuff it with x86 board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm planning on fitting a standard ATX motherboard in my G5 tower. From the few projects I've seen around, people seem to like to hack the case to make the ATX back panel fit. My approach is to not modify the case itself but to create a custom board for all the ports in the back. I just finished gutting the thing and still doing measurements.

  30. OpenBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OpenBSD will run fine on it, as will Debian.

  31. sup /g/entoo /b/ro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You decided to repost on Slashdot after being told?

  32. Perfectly usable and powerful with OS X by astro · · Score: 3, Informative

    We're using a G5 PowerPC tower to run all functions, including 24/7 streaming, of an internet radio station. Tons of modern software for it (including being able to live-stream after a compression and other audio manipulation chain)... I love Linux and use it on many machines for many purposes, but there's no reason to ditch OS X just because the machine is aging.

    1. Re:Perfectly usable and powerful with OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really? Try to use it as a video streaming _client_. We do that at work.
      We are stuck on PowerPC because of an old PowerPC only application, that all of our data is in (a tailor made replacement is in production by our software department, but it was started waaayy too late and because of priorities set by management, getting rid of the PowerPC only software is not even the highest priority. Dumb). Anyway, most of our staff actually have to use G4s and some G5 towers (some Dual Core). Try video playback from youtube together with Thunderbird, Firefox and NeoOffice and you got a hell of a slow machine, even with the G5. Unbelievable.

    2. Re:Perfectly usable and powerful with OS X by Andor666 · · Score: 1

      Do you also do automation? Which software do you use?

    3. Re:Perfectly usable and powerful with OS X by otuz · · Score: 1

      Flash is unbelievably slow for video streaming, ummkay. Combine that with some extreme bloatware like Thunderbird, Firefox and NeoOffice and yes, you'll need a 8-core Xeon to brute-force the issue.

    4. Re:Perfectly usable and powerful with OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Unfortunately, it is fact, that you still need flash to view Youtube videos. Yes, they have HTML5 videos now, but not for all of them and unfortunately, the guys at work mostly have to look at ones that are flash only ...
      Thunderbird... well, many of them would love to go back to their beloved Eudora, but well ...
      Firefox, true, some actually use Safari. Doesn't really make it that much better though, on those machines.
      As for NeoOffice, unless you want to go suggest buying MS Office for everyone (believe me, I tried), OpenOffice is even worse. NeoOffice is actually pretty fast compared to OpenOffice on those machines.
      My Intel Dual-core 2GHz laptop here at home is sooo much faster than the 1.8GHz Dual proc G5, it is unbelievable. And I actually do run the same applications here, that they do at work.

    5. Re:Perfectly usable and powerful with OS X by Bungie · · Score: 1

      We are stuck on PowerPC because of an old PowerPC only application, that all of our data is in

      You should take a look at PPC emulators for x86. I've actually been playing with SheepShaver on my Windows box and it emulates a PPC well enough on my core 2 duo that I was able to pack up my old PPC Mac systems and run the software I need in there. I'm running Mac OS 9.2.2 though...I have no clue how well it would run OS X. IIRC PearPC was supposed to be better at running OS X when I was reading up on it.

      It was a bit of a pain to get it setup initially. The Windows version of the emulator is available here. You also need a working Mac OS ROM image, which you have to find online or dump from one of your PPC Mac systems. There's an excellent torrent available called "Mac Emulation Kit" which contains a lot of good files you might want to get started.

      --
      The clash of honour calls, to stand when others fall.
    6. Re:Perfectly usable and powerful with OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that sounds great. The application in question is actually a MacOS 9 application, so we are running it in Classic on MacOS X. We do still have some MacOS 9 CDs I think, from our old G3s. My only concern is, that all of the projects seem quite dead, so if something doesn't work out, we'd have to fix it ourselves (which is not going to happen, our software department is not equipped with system level programmers :). Anyway, thanks for the pointer. Definitely going to check it out.

    7. Re:Perfectly usable and powerful with OS X by otuz · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd suggest iWork, Safari and Mail for OSX.
      Flash performance is so much worse on OSX (compared to the windows version), a windows emulator running the Flash plugin would probably be equal in performance.
      I had a Dual 2.3GHz G5 that I replaced with a 2.2GHz core2duo MacBook for a moment and there was a definite downgrade in over-all performance. However, my Mac Pro beats the G5 hands down in performance, but it seems to consume even more electricity and produces more heat, which is a benefit here in the long, cold winter of Finland.

  33. A file server? Linux? by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously? Okay. The OS that probably works best with this machine is --- drum roll -- OS X.

    Without hardly thinking about it it'll serve files via AFP and SMB.

    Google will tell you how to enable the NFS server on it. (That's right, you don't need OS X Server.)

    Streaming video? If there's open source software for Linux to do this, there's a pretty good chance it'll build on OS X too.

    1. Re:A file server? Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's this free thing Apple have; it's called Quicktime Streaming Server.
      Should work a treat.

    2. Re:A file server? Linux? by rtoads · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but no more security patches or bugfixes for that OS. Thanks, Apple. Linux OTOH will remain current for the forseeable future.

      Linux is also 100x more configurable for file serving, group permissions, etc.

      We've got three legacy PPC machines running Debian and they work dandy as file and web servers. Even a 600Mhz G3 running Yellow Dog. Power draw is an issue, I guess, but we're not going to run out and buy a bunch of low-wattage servers tomorrow, so using them is a lot better than throwing them out.

    3. Re:A file server? Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwin Streaming Server:

      http://dss.macosforge.org/

      This is the open source version of the package that comes with OS X server.

      It runs very well on OS X as you might imagine.

    4. Re:A file server? Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but no more security patches or bugfixes for that OS. Thanks, Apple.

      That's very likely not true. In the past Apple has released security patches long after the last major update. I fired up an old QuickSilver G4 a few months ago -- running Tiger because at 733Mhz it's too slow to upgrade to Leopard -- after it had been off for a few months and there were a slew of patches since it was last updated before it was turned off.

      Linux OTOH will remain current for the forseeable future.

      You'll have to define what you mean by current. Things like RHEL and SLE[DS] definitely stop updating beyond a certain point and you're forced to upgrade to the next patch-level or release.

      You can always go get the latest and greatest source for things your Linux vendor has stopped updating, e.g. Apache, OpenSSH; but you can do that for OS X too.

      Linux is also 100x more configurable for file serving, group permissions, etc.

      I don't buy that claim at all, even ignoring the 100x claim -- I call BS and I think you're just spreading FUD. They're both Unix(like) operating systems. They both are highly configurable for being file servers.

  34. Best Buy Trade In Program by mory · · Score: 4, Informative

    Trade it in! Best Buy has an online trade in program where you can get cash or a Best Buy gift card. I got a $200 for mine. You fill out some stuff online, print a pre-paid UPS label, wait about 3 weeks. Same money you'd get from craigslist, none of the emails for interesting trades. http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Electronics+Promotions/Online-Trade-In/pcmcat133600050011.c?id=pcmcat133600050011

    1. Re:Best Buy Trade In Program by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Unless you're in GA, you have to be the original purchaser, you must have purchased it at BestBuy, and you should have a receipt.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    2. Re:Best Buy Trade In Program by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Same money you'd get from craigslist, none of the emails for interesting trades

      But on the other hand, you'd have to shop at Best Buy to get anything out of it so that's no good.

      Unless you wanted to trade the gift certificate for "professional services" on Craigslist, but that brings you right back where you started.

    3. Re:Best Buy Trade In Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      id=pcmcat133600050011 eh? ;-)

  35. Folding@Home by Inoculate86 · · Score: 1

    I would install Folding@Home on all the hardware I had if it were me in your situation.

    1. Re:Folding@Home by Macrat · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think you realize how much electricity a G5 tower sucks up.

    2. Re:Folding@Home by elfprince13 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you realize how good the Power architecture is for Folding@Home.

  36. Old PC by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    I got a reconditioned Dell OptiPlex GX240 for £50 (from http://www.cambridgecomputershop.co.uk/ ) and even though Firefox is a pain in the arse, Ubuntu 10.4 runs more than adequately on it.

  37. Sell and go VM by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 0, Troll

    You will be shocked at how much you can get for an old Mac. It is like an old Porsche. I am typing this on my old mac Powerbook G4 Running 10.5.8. Unless you are looking at something dedicated in which case a pile of junk PC with Linux will use less power and still leave you with some money I would recommend confining any Linux experiments to some sort of VM.

    In years of Linux experiments I have never found a real machine to be easier than a VM for torturing Linux. I save the real machines for real servers.

  38. Fileserver... by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

    That's what I use my old Mac for. Running OSX 10.5, Samba as my server. Clients are a PS2 with Free MC Boot and SMS, as well as a Wii with MPlayerCE. Unfortunately, the PS2 is far superior :(. The Wii is my backup for low-def shows, since it has a 2 TB harddrive attached. SABnzbd is a must. I also have NZBMobile on my Android phone. Never been happier with a weekend project.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  39. Make it a modern Mac by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gut it and use the case to build a modern PC, on which you can install Mac OS X by using Prasys' EmpireEFI. Or just install whatever you want. The G5 may be outdated, but the case is still beautiful.

    1. Re:Make it a modern Mac by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Rip the guts out and out a Mini in there.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Make it a modern Mac by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Rip the guts out and out a Mini in there.

      That'd be missing the point of a hackintosh (a powerful and expandable Mac for a low price) and the point of a Mac mini (a very small and discreet computer).

      Unless, of course, you intend to plug a bunch of external drives to the mini. Then it'd make sense.

    3. Re:Make it a modern Mac by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

      You could definitely skip the rip the guts out step.

    4. Re:Make it a modern Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100% with this post, so many people have done it too. It's not hard at all and you end up with a beautiful looking x86 machine that you can run OS X on if you want too.

  40. i'll take it by defective_warthog · · Score: 1

    I'll pay the shipping.

  41. I hate to say it... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate to say it, but the nature of CPUs has changed so much since the Core architecture that you might want to eBay that box and buy something like an Atom Nettop.

    The G5 and P4 were both pretty much the 'end of the line' of the idea that faster=hotter and more power-hungry.

    I keep a G4 dualie around for Mac work, but it's basically a space heater. I advise clients to decommission their P4-based systems ASAP. My dual-core Core 2 idles at under 60W, the G4 uses almost 200W and shows a lot less for it.

    Seriously, somewhere out there is a young web designer who wants that G5. eBay it. Take the money and buy a modern machine that -is- supported by the latest distros and won't silently cost you $10/month.

    I really like the Atom 330/ION combination, you get low-power, dual-core, accelerated video and 2D, and 64-bits of goodness. Sure, it's slower than a G5, but it's enough to saturate a gigabit pipe, or play 1080p h.264 via HDMI, browse, type, serve files or multimedia, etc. You could probably buy three matching ION-based nettops if you tossed the G5.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:I hate to say it... by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

      FYI The current Mac Mini, also a Core 2 Duo, idles at 10 watts, max consumption is 85 watts even in this configuration: 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo, 8GB 1066 DDR3 (2x4GB) 320GB Hard Drive, built in GeForce 320M, SuperDrive (CD/DVD Burner)

    2. Re:I hate to say it... by ignavus · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it, but the nature of CPUs has changed so much since the Core architecture that you might want to eBay that box and buy something like an Atom Nettop.

      And next week we'll get a thread about "I just bought this G5 on ebay..."

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    3. Re:I hate to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take the money and buy a modern machine that -is- supported by the latest distros and won't silently cost you $10/month.

      I"m guessing you have never worked with one if you consider anything about the G5 "silent" :)

    4. Re:I hate to say it... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I advise clients to decommission their P4-based systems ASAP

      Why? Unless it's a Prescott, they don't use that more power than many Core 2 chips or a Core i5. And even if it is a Prescott it's not worse than a Core i7.

  42. Macs are to graphic artists, as are . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Guns to NRA members. It's an SAT question. Old Macs can never be disposed of. Stash 'em in the attic, in the cellar, in the closet . . . Macies just cannot part themselves from 'em. I live with a graphic artist, and any time I mention that she should get rid of those old Macs, I face an armed insurrection. Two G4 Towers stuffed away somewhere, and a "7600" (whaddever the fuck that is) in the attic.

    It really reminds me of some old geezer talking about his firearms:

    "Well, it might not look like much to you youngens', but that was my Granddaddy's shootin' iron . . . shoot the ears off a fly with that, he could. "

    "Well, back in 1998, I programmed that Mac in Lingo with Macromedia Director, to create great animations for my thesis work . . . "

    I think my next winter project will be to gut them, fill them with Christmas lights, and turn them into audaciously outrageously tacky furniture . . .

    Anything, as long as they don't leave the premises is probably ok . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Macs are to graphic artists, as are . . . by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      "7600" - 120 to 200 MHz PowerPC 604 that can go up to 1 GB of RAM.

      I'm one of those Mac users who is also an NRA member. I keep both the Macs and guns.

    2. Re:Macs are to graphic artists, as are . . . by peacefinder · · Score: 1

      Wait! That's it!

      Turn that old G5 tower into a very stylish handgun safe!

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    3. Re:Macs are to graphic artists, as are . . . by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      So true. I've caught myself doing the "you see sonny ... this old yellow thing is a Mac Quadra. It went for 10,000 dollars and had 128 megabytes of memory, which was amazing ... hey! pay attention!"

      Then I figured out the thing wouldn't even boot and hauled it off to the junkyard.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    4. Re:Macs are to graphic artists, as are . . . by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

      Funny, why DO Apple people keep their Macs?
      I live with a Graphic Artist too, but I'm the one that stashes her old Macs.
      Ever find a PC / WIN / Linux stasher? [there's a reason]

      Didn't think so.

      --
      ~hylas
    5. Re:Macs are to graphic artists, as are . . . by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, given what those computers cost new, it's kind of hard to throw them away. Especially if they still work. I don't have any Macs, but I have enough stashed away PCs so I know the feeling.

      I don't get the gun analogy though. Properly taken care of they'll last forever, and something like a 99-year-old 1911 pistol isn't that much different than a brand new one.

    6. Re:Macs are to graphic artists, as are . . . by Bungie · · Score: 1

      That's pretty crazy. I've never noticed that before, but I've been keeping my Macs around too. I don't even use them at all, and some are definately too old to be used for anything practical.

      Still...I just can't bring myself to throw them away, I don't know why...

      --
      The clash of honour calls, to stand when others fall.
    7. Re:Macs are to graphic artists, as are . . . by lunatic1969 · · Score: 1

      "7600" - 120 to 200 MHz PowerPC 604 that can go up to 1 GB of RAM.

      I'm one of those Mac users who is also an NRA member. I keep both the Macs and guns.

      *sound of light clicking on* Hey! I'll make it in to a case for my guns! Thanks! *sound of jigsaw running*

  43. Trash it, get a SheevaPlug by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    As much as it cost you (or someone) Back In The Day, it's relatively worthless now. If you need a home server, buy a hackable router or SheevaPlug and go from there. For power, space, cooling, fan noise, you are just wasting your time.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  44. Probably not worth keeping... by david.emery · · Score: 1

    Frankly, you might want to just decommission this machine. Those G5 CPUs and the associated fans draw a lot of power and throw a lot of heat. Replacing my G5 with a Mini (as a file server) produced a negligible drop in performance as a file server (OS X Leopard Server) by using FW800 drives with hardware RAID instead of SATA drives with MacOS X Software RAID. But the temperature in my home office dropped by a couple of degrees once I turned that G5 off. (It tossed an amazing amount of heat, even when it wasn't running full blast.)

    The one thing that G5 was -really good at- was ripping CDs, because PowerPC G5's floating point performance is generally a lot faster than Intel's... I'd suspect you'd get similar performance for video and other floating-point intensive operations.

    dave

    1. Re:Probably not worth keeping... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How are you doing raid on the mini?
      Or is this more a file losing server than a file hosting server?

    2. Re:Probably not worth keeping... by david.emery · · Score: 1

      RAID enclosure, OWC Qx4, to be specific. I have 4x1TB drives in a hardware RAID 5 configuration (3TB from the enclosure exposed through a single FW800 port.) This provides file server for my SOHO (4 machine) network. A Mini server costs $1k (less if you go for an Apple refurb) and the Qx4 set me back about $600. The Mini and Qx4 don't make much noise or generate much heat (important in a small home office.)

      That enclosure, by the way, gives good performance but is sensitive to the drives. OWC insists you put 4 matched drives in it, and I previously had 1TB Seagate drives, that gave me multiple drive failures. It's been running quite happily with 1TB Toshiba drives. I'll not buy any more Seagate drives, this isn't my first bad experience with that brand.

    3. Re:Probably not worth keeping... by lunatic1969 · · Score: 1

      I'll not buy any more Seagate drives, this isn't my first bad experience with that brand.

      Ages and Ages Ago, I physically took the cover off a seagate drive so that I could start the platter spinning with my finger in order to salvage data off it. And I got the data, too. I haven't purchased another seagate drive since.

  45. G5s are old now? by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    My 9500 is still hard at work, making midis and um... doing... Photoshop 3.5? The 500Mhz G3 processor upgrade really helps with heavy duty tasks like web browsing. Not to mention all of my mission-critical HyperCard stacks!

  46. Re:ubuntu? or just rsync? by tibit · · Score: 1

    I don't have direct experience with PPC, but I've had decent results with Fedora on my Intel iMac. The only problem in the very beginning was lack of support from the Nvidia driver for the native screen resolution of the built-in LCD panel. That got fixed later. Apart from the inconvenience of having to keep up with binary Nvidia drivers, it ran like a champ. Used it to get through Doom 3 and Quake 4. Fedora supports PPC, and AFAIK should run on anything that would run OS X.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  47. Do what I do with mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    run folding@home on it I use inCrease to run two simulations since there isn't an smp client for powerpc, and it's always there to pull files off of when you need them.

    1. Re:Do what I do with mine by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      So you use it as a stylish space heater? :p

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  48. Malware Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wouldn't a G5 be the ultimate in security-by-obscurity? A G5 won't run Intel binaries, and who the hell is going to take the trouble of digging up a PPC compiler? It's the closest you can get, at this level of computing power, to building your own machine with its own binary architecture and microcode/instruction set.

  49. Boat anchor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tie a rope around it, throw it overboard when you want to stop drifting.

  50. Fire. by Iburnaga · · Score: 1

    Thermite, definitely thermite. Destroy it and rejoice in the fire!

    --
    iburnaga.blogspot.com
  51. I WANT IT!!! by trum4n · · Score: 1

    GIMMIEGIMMIEGIMMIE! btw, im a 22 year old college student...and my mac is a dual g4 500. I NEED A NEW MAC!

  52. Hmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not make it watertight and test whether that Pepsi+Mentos experiment is scalable? ;)

  53. Space Heater by djdavetrouble · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get those CPU's working and those 5 fans cranking and it makes a pretty attractive space heater.
    I know that my Macpro with dual 8800GT's is in a pretty fair matchup against my 5000 btu air conditioner.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  54. Sell it to someone who wants a Mac by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

    It is still a very capable machine and can run a currently supported OS (Leopard) as well as accepting a decent amount of RAM. If someone wants to get into Macs, a G5 tower isn't a bad way to do it as it is decently quick and most software is still compatible with PPC. It would give them at least a couple of good years desktop service and that would be far better than relegating it to being a server.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  55. Auction by pspahn · · Score: 1

    Some Apple fanboi will probably pay a premium for such a relic. I'd sell it and go buy some pancake mix.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  56. UPS ( Brown truck varitey ) by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    And send it to me.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  57. Unload For MacMini by cmholm · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, the G5 is a power sink. If the power bill is of little concern, the box will work well as a media server, cd/dvd ripper, and everything else server. I've found both Debian and Ubuntu to be good matches for previous PPC systems, but at the moment I'm using OSX 10.5 to support a few favored apps for when my wife beats me to the Powerbook.

    If you wanted a server that went easy on the electricity, I'd research the delta - if any - between the G5 and a Mac Mini PPC/Intel.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  58. power hungry, yes. Trivial performance, no. by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They may be power-hungry (idle power usage is 120-160w depending on the model/year; the later models were more power-efficient) but the G5's had a very impressive memory architecture. That and the G5 processor itself were designed to shovel bucketloads of data, mostly for media. Keep in mind that MacOS resumes from sleep mode very quickly, and power usage in sleep mode is nil. Not great for servers, but great for occasional work with media like photos or video.

  59. Sell it by Teese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'd be surprised what an older G5 desktop sells for on the used market. Any software dev that supports PowerPC apps needs testing machines, and dev boxes. Faster PowerPCs like G5s are in demand out there.

    --
    "I'm a Genius!"*


    *Not an actual Genius
  60. Sell it by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sell it or maybe use the case, they look quite nice. That might take some work to get non-Apple components in it though (I'm not familiar with how they are set up internally). I was in a similar situation with an old P4 Dell. It's just not worth the noise, heat, and power drain for what essentially is a low intensity task. Serving files or even streaming video doesn't take that much power and G5s and P4s are just too inefficient for what you get.

    Sell it and get a Mac mini, or some other comparable low cost/efficient computer. Attach some external drives to it and you're done. Alternatively you could buy an Airport Extreme and a USB hub, plug in a few external hard drives and you have a much better and efficient home server.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  61. G4 by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

    Wish I had that problem. My main media server/ssh/ftp server/used by my wife daily is an old G4. Still works great for all of those things.

  62. Quite simply by cyberzephyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fish tank

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    1. Re:Quite simply by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Why have fish swim inside it when it's better to have fish swim around it instead.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  63. Nice case. by ErkDemon · · Score: 1

    Gut it, Dremel out most of the front panel, and use it as a stylish designer aluminium box with handy handles, for holding newspapers and magazines.

  64. Ubuntu 10.04 by hedronist · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had such a bad experience installing 10.04 on a vanilla Dell laptop I wiped it and went back to 9.04. I don't know what they did to the install process, but the suckage meter was pegging.

    1. Re:Ubuntu 10.04 by Shompol · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had the same problem. Then tried 2 months later and not only did it install, but new Atheroes wifi card magically started working, while it did not work under 9.10. They are working on it, don't dismiss it just yet.

    2. Re:Ubuntu 10.04 by pwnies · · Score: 1

      I just installed 10.04 on a Dell Precision T3400 about two weeks ago. No issues here.

  65. Um, recycling uses energy too, guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe all the recycle to save energy comments. Recycling a computer takes a lot of energy itself and creates a fair amount of waste. This is one tower, not a room full of servers. If you can find a use for it, then using the old machine is the greener option than getting rid of it.

  66. Debian by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    Debian should work fine on it. I had the latest debian running on a G4 iMac.

  67. Re:Shove it up your arse by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 0

    You're holding it wrong.

    --
    "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
  68. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love appl. It's the shizzle

    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/apple

  69. Audio, Video, Photo, 3D editing? Its made for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The G5 tower was originally made for applications like Logic Pro (audio editing), Final Cut (Video editing), Photo Shop (Photo editing) Maya (3D Modeling), and it still supply's enough power to do so.

    I am a creative person myself, and i find that even a old G4 could do these things rather well (use a old ibook G4 1ghz for 8 channel recording on Audacity), and with the growth of open source applications to "replace" the previous proprietary programs, it could be a great use!
    It could also be used for Rendering of audio, video or 3D, since it has enough power.

  70. That's easy. by Minwee · · Score: 1

    Get two of them and a nice wooden board for the top. Build yourself a desk.

    You can even put a computer from this century on top of it.

  71. Blender server by ozbird · · Score: 1

    As in Will it Blend? A V8 is recommended.

  72. Arcade by Warriorccc0 · · Score: 1

    Make it into a arcade machine.

  73. Re:ubuntu? or just rsync? by Larryish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At some point you have to listen to the voice of reason when someone says "it's OLD, time to REPLACE it", when you want to reply "but it still WORKS FINE".

    No, you don't.

  74. I have one too by rinoid · · Score: 1

    Trying to seek it on craigslist. Find it on craiglook.com if you want one. Great machine, extraneous and non x86.

    1. Re:I have one too by rinoid · · Score: 1

      Sorry, trying to "sell" it on craigslist.

  75. Re:Conspicuous Consumerism by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, word... Definitely don't trash it. Sell it on Craigslist to some Mac fanatic. There are so many of them, it's amazing how well they hold on to their resale value.

    I recently sold a POS 600Mhz G3 ibook that I had bought for my wife (who had always been a Mac person until I bought her one of her very own). It was half the speed, RAM, even color depth than a much newer Dell laptop I had bought for my mother, and yet there was a lot more interest in the Mac. It wouldn't even run a version of Firefox newer than 2.0 because I didn't bother to pay for new versions of OSX every few years.

    So I'm still stuck with the Dell laptop... whatever. it makes a great random photo frame viewer and terminal :P

  76. PPC Macs are still useful. by adric22 · · Score: 1

    There are actually quite a few PPC machines still in use out there. I am actually using a G4 Mac Mini to type this. True, they are obsolete and not particularly fast. At least the G4 Mac Mini is power-efficient. But, for geeks, these machines can still keep going for several years beyond their usual life-span. I also use a G4 Mac Mini hooked up to a daisy-chain of firewire hard drives for my file-server and it does very well.

    Incidentally, I tried Ubuntu on a G4 Mac Mini recently and found it very lacking for a desktop PC. But it would probably be okay for a server.

  77. Give it to the ex-wife by _Dave · · Score: 1

    So I didn't get bugged by stupid PC support questions. Best decision I made.

    Apart from divorce of course.

  78. Boat anchor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The G5 is mostly a beautiful albatross in 2010. Put it to real use. It can be filled with lead and/or iron, and used to moor a medium-sized boat.

  79. Agree... by bashibazouk · · Score: 1

    I work with a bunch of G5 dual 2.+ GHz machines. I do large format printing and design for trade shows and crunch huge files. Those machine have kept their usefulness a surprisingly long time.

    And I have no idea what all this "wind tunnel" crap is, I work on Gig + files consistently and they are as quiet as a mouse...

     

  80. don't send it to china by jewishbaconzombies · · Score: 1

    There's not an unsubstantial amount of aluminum in that chassis. I'd gut it and take the shell down to the recycling center for a bit of cash before "donating" it.

    Seriously - how many pounds is that shell? 20? At about a dollar a pound (?). Scrap it.

    1. Re:don't send it to china by Tom9729 · · Score: 1

      Or he could just sell the whole computer for a few hundred dollars (hint: check eBay).

    2. Re:don't send it to china by jewishbaconzombies · · Score: 1

      agreed (I sold mine to some students using M-Studio) - but a the bottom of the list, most just cart them off to be "recycled", without considering that they can recycle the metal for money.

      It's the first Mac to be made with that in mind, I say go for it yourself before letting the Chinese have it.

  81. I use mine as a file server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would suggest putting two WD RE4 1TB (or larger if you want) drives inside, installing MacOS X 10.4 (w/latest patches), setting up a mirrored RAID set, adding an external 1TB drive via FW, and using CCC to create an incremental backup schedule for the external drive. Use one of the gigabit ethernet ports for the user facing side, and 2nd gig-e port for dedicated admin functions. That's what I did. It's been running solid for 2+ years, never needs reboot (except when I intentionally update something or change a significant configuration). It might not be as geeky as installing a PPC Linux distro, but it's a heck of a lot easier and works very well.

  82. Obvious dilemma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shiny paperweight or doorstop?

  83. eBay...... by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

    I just did a completed listing search on eBay (Australia) and a used G5 will fetch you between $200 - $600...

    --
    Never happened. True story.
  84. Audio Studio by MrMadnutz · · Score: 1

    Yep, I just picked one up for free to replace my (gasp, G4) and it works perfectly well for me in a recording environment with some massive storage space attached to it. Doesn't beat me MBP in terms of performance, DUH, but does some pretty heavy lifting for what I use it for.

  85. OSX + Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a few older Apple machines (in the free to cheap range), use OS 10.4, and Qmaster. It can speed up encoding tasks alot.

  86. Re:Or he could use it as a buttplug cabinet. by grub · · Score: 1

    Hahaha, I love the Mac and laughed when I read that, lighten up mods.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  87. What is the case worth? by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are commenting that it's not worth it to use as a computing device. I'm not sure I completely agree, but lets say for a moment that they're right.

    What do you do with that industrial strength case?

    That thing is a serious piece of metal. And there's a LOT of it.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  88. Playing World of Warcraft on mine, as I type this by jlagrua · · Score: 1

    Sure, I don't have 4xFSAA enabled, but plays fine for me. Plus: Adobe Illustrator CS; Adobe InDesign CS; Adobe Photoshop CS; Adobe Reader 8; Autodesk Maya; Delicious Library.app; DivX Converter; Final Cut Pro HD.app; Freefall.app; Google Earth.app; Google SketchUp 6; iDVD.app; iPhoto.app; iTunes.app; Logic Pro.app; MATLAB701; Microsoft Office 2004; NoteBook.app; OmniGraffle.app; OmniOutliner.app; QuickTime Broadcaster.app; Remote Desktop.app; Reunion 9.app; Skype.app; Sound Studio; SoundSoap 2.app; Soundtrack.app; TeamSpeex.app; ToonBoomStudio; Transmit.app; Ventrilo.app; VideoGlide; Virtual PC.app; VLC.app... Plus many, many, MANY, others. All run without noticeable performance issues. And if I had more than the 2GB of RAM that's in it, it would be even better. As soon as it needs it, I'll spend the money. If you can see past the "gotta-get-a-newer-machine-because-somebody-out-there-has-something-newer-than-mine" mentality there's no end to the things you can do with an older machine. As soon as my Dual 2.5 ceases to meet my needs It will go into my museum of dead tech with the others. Until then, it will remain my core duty machine. Hell, not too long ago I won a $100 bet with a friend who didn't think I could get my Radius 81/110 (PowerMac 8100 Clone - circa 1995-1996) on the Internet in less than 30 minutes, from a boxed-up state. It took me 15 and that was only because I had to hunt to find a long-assed ethernet cable to reach from the garage to my office. Easy money. So if nothing else, win bets off the naysayers until you can afford a new MacPro tower. Nuff said.

    --
    - Que profuturus est maeror causa sententia Caelestis
  89. Best recommended use by far! by ROMRIX · · Score: 3, Funny

    My favorite use for any G5 has been in the Marine environment as a Geo-Synchronous aquatic stabilizer.
    To use simply load any flavor of Linux you prefer, attach one (1) CAT5 securely to the G5 unit and to your MTV (Marine Transportation Vehicle). Place the G5 into a solution of 100% Dihydrogen Monoxide and feed out the CAT5 cable as needed to achieve Geo-Synchronous aquatic stabilization. If however you prefer to use a solution of 96.5% Dihydrogen Monoxide and 3.5% Sodium Chloride then I highly recommend networking a minimum of 100 G5 units securely attached with multiple CAT5 cables or scaled to the size of your MTV.

  90. hackintosh it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gutted my G5 1.6 ghz machine as I couldn't justify the cost of electricity. I had it Folding but it is WAY slower than even the cheapest x86 mobo nowadays. Eventually I will get around to putting some nice mobo in it and make a hackintosh.

  91. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a G4 tower running Mac OS 10.3.9 that sturdily runs Pro Tools with it's PCI sound board and even does the occasional visit to Mac OS 9 for some of my sound apps that were never ported to OS X.

    It's in the basement with the drum set and PA system ready to be a good soldier for recording music. And it's connected via ethernet to transfer files or whatever.

    My Linux boxes reside elsewhere in the home.

  92. Toss it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You toss it away and buy a new shiny Mac for $3000. C'mon you know the drill.

  93. keep it around then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how long can you expect it to be supported, secure, functional - assuming 'supported' means vendor patches (so 3rd party libs are viable) are provided, 'secure' means vendor resources are directed at keeping .x release secured against vulnz, and most importantly - three, which assumes the machine effectively delivers the intended experience. How long before the new whizz-bang tool's supported platforms excludes yours?

    2 years on one, 6 months on two, and I can posit an answer to three; As long as it takes for a vendor to announce a shift to a new platform - which has come and gone.

    Turn those cycles and bus access into distributed compute performance - throw in some GPUs with a dist lib, and put the power consumption to better use than you can devise yourself. Don't login, just put it in the basement and let it whir.

  94. the only true good use for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    two words "boat anchor"

  95. Sell it to... by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...a user on Al'Kabor.

    http://eqmac.com/forums/index.php

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  96. What To Do With an Old G5 Tower? by infiniphonic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll trade you something for it.

    --
    Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
  97. big case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a big case. Surely room for a modern board in there?

  98. Most machines are horribly overpowered for desktop by Marrow · · Score: 1

    So this one will be a little less overpowered. Its not green, frugal, or smart to throw it away.

    Drive it until the wheels fall off.

  99. Play free games by guacamole · · Score: 1

    I'd play idtche3 games, such as Urban Terror or Tremolous, on it.

  100. ... but you don't know what you're talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-)

    Seriously, the G5 is a Power4+ microarchitecture... in some ways it's closer to IBM's latest Power7 or Intel Nehalem than Power6 or Intel's P4...

    In fact, the later G5 models from Apple weren't -that- power hungry when idle and can still deliver some quite nice performances.

  101. Embeded dev by pestilence669 · · Score: 1

    G5's are great when you're working on PPC embedded hardware. I've had luck using VMs where full emulation was too slow. I think MS even used G5s for original XBox work, but that's just a rumor.

  102. give it to a charity org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do a favor to humanity: Spend this last extra cash and ship it to a 3rd world school

  103. Buy an Atom system and go green by rlh100 · · Score: 1

    If you are thinking about this for your home, think about the cost of power. I bet that G5 sucks a lot of AC juice. And most likely this is at the highest tier of your power pricing. In the winter its not so bad because it heats the house, but in the summer if you live in an area where air conditioning is not just nice but an essential then you have to suck that heat out.

    Buy one of these atom mother boards like the one of the fanless mini-ATX mother boards, one of the PicoPSU DC-DC ATX power supplies that plugs into the ATX power socket, http://www.mini-box.com/picoPSU-80, and you have a system that would make a nice file server. Add one or two 2 Tb 3.5" drives if you need space or one or two 500 Mb 2.5" drives to save power. This would give you a nice file server that sips the juice. Would probably pay for it self in a year in power savings and it is good for the environment.

    I switched my X86_64 desktop for a dual core atom a year ago and love how much cooler it runs. My office is in the attic and does not have air conditioning or a window so heat is a big issue for me. I run Linux on the desktop and do browsing, email, text editing and the performance is acceptable. Sort of like the first dual core 32 bit systems. It is not a gaming system, but I am not a gamer.

    Go green, use low power computers and save the environment.

    RLH

  104. Buy OS X Leopard (or server) and use it by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geez, that is not a G3 Machine for God's sake. It is a workstation which is still used in production environments.

    It is supported via OS X Leopard which the Snow Leopard doesn't share the same name just because Apple couldn't find a new cat name, it is because Snow Leopard was _built on_ OS X Leopard. Just like Windows 7 vs. Windows Vista. Of course, Apple did "security/safari/itunes only updates" but, it was their own choice with lots of iPad/iPhone stuff going on. Also you wouldn't want "snow leopard" pure 64bit OS on it since on G5, "pure 64bit" really means "access more than 4 GB on a single application", not anything else. It is not x86 which had "bonus stuff" coming to that archaic architecture which wins because of popularity. I am telling these "karma suicide" things since if you actually go pure Linux, make sure you pick a 32bit distro as "pure 64bit coolness" may&will mean overhead and slowness.

    Unless developer is a complete "trendy type", he/she still supports OS X Leopard/PPC since there is no reason not to. Of course, I speak about "native OS X apps", not Adobe stuff coming with lots of Windows/X86 copy paste code. Look to top 10 downloads in various sites, they are all PPC/X86/Leopard+. Tiger has issues since it doesn't have kernel functionality in some cases, like the VLC (I heard it is about threads).

    For the people saying "massive heat", "power". G5 in Workstation configuration, idles 37 degrees celsius. How much does your Intel do? SJobs had very valid points, about future of Apple and how IBM G5 (PPC970) doesn't fit to it... But the "heat", "watt" etc. were all misunderstood, out of context. It doesn't fit to portable future (which was proved right), it happily runs on desktop, _still_ with IBM current AIX 7 (beta, massive specs) included.

    I owned a G5 1600, moved to Quad G5 2500 so I can keep on PPC arch for a long time (was proved right not to jump to those early Intels), I also got G4 Mini, there are more Intel Macs in house... I try so hard to get "impressed", like Wow factor, when you as Amiga 500 user, run Amiga 4000 first time... Can't yet... As Apple keeps doing crazy things like using core duo in this age, where i5/i3 exists, for a long time, I am staying. If Developers doesn't support? "My" vendors are real Mac software houses, you know the ones running XCode. They still support and unless a real necessity happens, they will keep supporting.

    It would be "fun" to suggest some nerd fantasy, some kind of joke but, really if you come to slashdot asking "what to do" with a 64bit RISC processor which, if it was IBM pSeries, would have current OS.... You get it... Check the websites/irc channels you frequent, someone really did some reality field distortion to you.

    1. Re:Buy OS X Leopard (or server) and use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>G5 in Workstation configuration, idles 37 degrees celsius.
      This is completely irrelevant, my Intel idles at 24c, but I could replace the TIM with glue, watch my temps skyrocket, and the processor would still be putting the same amount of heat into my room.

  105. Of the Macs I have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my workplace we retired many G5s and most were given to IT to do with as they please...So far our department uses them for footrests and for imaging old PPC Macs.

    The 60% or so seem to have dead harddrives or bad motherboards, which is about par for Apple's dealings with my organization.

  106. Swap the guts for a new system or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install Darwin and turn it into a file server/DNS server.

  107. Why not edit porn? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    You know, nice joke but, someone really tricked him good.

    As a person in video/tv (not porn) business, I know the porn types and lots of G5 towers are used in that business, today. It is because, just like any video/dtp/audio business, they don't buy "trendy" stuff, they run hardware as long as it fits to their purposes. In video, it is all about AVID/FCP/Plugins/Disk bandwidth/Card availability. All you care is what spec (720p/1080/web only/3GPP) you will offer your content on.

    Audio really gets interesting since Audio types are the last ones to get impressed. All they care is, Pro tools and particular version they are used to run. Similar on professional DTP too.

    I keep reading the title trying to figure if he really means G5, not G3 which has a horrible lack of Altivec (like SSE/MMX). Confused really.

    1. Re:Why not edit porn? by lunatic1969 · · Score: 1

      I keep reading the title trying to figure if he really means G5, not G3 which has a horrible lack of Altivec (like SSE/MMX). Confused really.

      I really mean G5. Big, shiny, indestructible case and all.

  108. Recycle mobo/CPU, keep the rest by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    I would recycle the motherboard/CPU (with a legitimate company) and be done with it. You'd get a much better performance/watt ratio with a more modern box. Keep the case, RAM (depending on specs; otherwise, recycle), and drives and get a newer mobo/CPU combo. If the HDD is smallish, you can put the OS/apps on it and get another drive for data.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  109. Re:Or he could use it as a buttplug cabinet. by knappe+duivel · · Score: 1

    As a Mac user, he no doubt has a large collection of buttplugs.

    Is that still considered funny?

  110. How come no one came with this by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1
  111. PornOS! by srodden · · Score: 1

    What a great idea! I think I'll create a new distro specialised for creating home porn server!

    I shall call it PornOS. The default desktop wallapper will be leopard skin naugahyde and the default screensaver will be a slideshow of screenshots from Boogie Nights. The keyboard mapping will be optimised for one-handed typing and when you click things with a mouse it'll make "chicka-bow-chicka-bow" type noises.

    I shall not rename the admin account. I think 'root' already has that covered.

    I wonder if pornos.org is still available...

    --
    Why can't we let people believe whatever they like? It's not like a little religion has ever hurt anyone.
  112. I use my G5 to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To answer the big "OS" question, I still think OS X is the dominant and the definite PPC OS, with no need to tinker with any components (unless you want to use a 3rd party RAID card or some other exotic addons, which I would say...good luck). I've tried installing Linux distros on the PowerMac G5, mainly Debian, Red Hat, Yellowdog, and Ubuntu, and none of them gave me the x86 experience that I am so accustomed to (or I should say, x86-64, because we all know how nasty Linux is in the Pentium days). Updates for Debian and Ubuntu would regularly break my system, and I just don't have enough confidence and trust for PPC Linux to do anything serious with the G5+Linux (I installed Ubuntu 20 times on the G5, did different updates to find out which updates was breaking the system, maybe I should be a PPC Linux tester...). I've never grown to Red Hat, as I've been brainwashed with Debian ever since I took up Linux, and frankly, you'd have to configure the heck out of Red Hat in order for it to be functional, and might not even be functional for the PPC port. And Yellowdog, basically, the most compatible PPC Linux OS, but the library of software from the repository is very much Red Hat (unless you compile from source, in which case you should pretty much run Gentoo). So basically I've trashed the G5 and just run pure OS X.

    With the G5 and OS X, I mainly use Unison to backup the important stuff from my x86 Linux Box, and then turn it off for the reason that the G5 is indeed a power vampire. I would, on occasion, use the G5 box for Final Cut Pro / Audio editing, but I'm mainly an enthusiast in that field, and of course I do the occasional PPC code compilation, so again, main usage is for backup. I considered using it as a file / apache server, but I did the power consumption test on the G5, and it's not pretty...a x86 machine (anywhere from an Athlon 64 X2) would do a WAY better server job for less power consumption (from what I gathered, CISC VS. RISC is ancient history). Everytime I turn on my G5, I feel like driving a Hummer, i.e., the energy bill is not gonna be cheap. So right, my G5 is the occasional backup machine, aka the Sunday driver.

    But of course you can be like Linus Torvalds. Correct me on this, but, last time I checked, Linus is still using his "free" PowerMac 2.3GHz dual for his Linux kernel development and testing (i.e., his personal enthusiast machine), so maybe you can get into that. (I'll cite/link this if anyone cares, although like always, Google is your friend).

    In my opinion, PPC is definitely not for general computing. It's more of an architecture that is used to break the TOP100, or if you are like me, an ancient relic I cling onto to gather dust, because I know there won't be another general purpose PPC machine that will be released in the future. For the same reason, isn't that why some people still keep their Zilog Z80 machines?

    At this point in time, mostly everyone use x86 for general purpose computing / basic server work, along with ARM to please the mobile crowd.

  113. Use in an educational Marketing Exhibition by Budenny · · Score: 1

    The thing always was an overpriced dog. Yet, it sold, and its merits were totally believed in by the Apple community.

    So it should be placed side by side with a couple of similar era Windows machines which sold for about half the price or less. It is not necessary for specifications to be identical in terms of memory and disk space, you just need roughly competitive products from the same era. It should be loaded with benchmark software and Photoshop, and set up for similar tasks.

    The lesson of course will be that you could do the same things faster for half the price.

    Then visitors can meditate as they watch on a number of questions, the leading one being, how on earth did Apple get away with it for so long? How did people manage to argue that Apple hardware was cheaper than PC hardware if you bought the same functionality? Why on earth was there universal opposition among the Apple people to a move to Intel. And why did they simply roll over and applaud as soon as the move was made?

    An alternative suggestion would be, if there are young children around who have never travelled by air, it could be used to introduce them to the authentic sound of a jet taking off, so that when they do finally travel, they will not be alarmed. That noise, you can explain to them, is turbine fans.

    1. Re:Use in an educational Marketing Exhibition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it should be placed side by side with a couple of similar era Windows machines which sold for about half the price or less.
      ...
      The lesson of course will be that you could do the same things faster for half the price.

      Be sure to include maintenance costs in that comparison. I worked in a University department that had its own IT staff, they had 2 full-time techs just dealing with Windows crap like constant updates and disinfection of malware. It cost over $70,000 a year just to keep the shit running. The Macs were practically free by comparison.

  114. Make it a Buildbot for Open Source Projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make the machine a buildbot for open source projects (Mozilla, OpenOffice.org, Linux). Projects will be more than happy to have a fast PPC buildbot.

  115. Re:ubuntu? or just rsync? by segin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thank you! I have an old 486 that runs NetBSD 5.0. There are spells that are months long that I don't power it up, but when I do, it's debuggerin' time! I use the extreme constraints to refactor code for performance. Just stretch your expectations for execution time by times 5. A C2D is 100 times faster than the Am486DX2, but I like to torture myself until whatever it is I was coding runs no slower than 5 times longer than it originally did on the C2D. This is actually reasonable given the "slow but safe" model for the original draft code - it leaves plenty of room for improvement, and a 20x speed increase is quite possible in many cases - first draft code is never the best. When I finally take my code back to the C2D box, it screams. Old machines might be energy hogs per unit of performance, but any good programmer can use one to tighten code down as long as the code can reasonably be made to run on the old iron. If not, try on slightly newer iron until it at least runs, and then code on whatever oldest hardware you can get your code to run on. Don't stop til it runs reasonably given the hardware it is on.

  116. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if you have access to some high-grade explosives...

  117. music machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got my G5+Apple Display 20" for 75€ (yes, it was a deal). Found an airport card from a powerbook g4, stuck terabyte disks in it and now it sits in my music studio. When I feel inspired I turn it on and start composing with Ableton Live and Logic Studio, that's the real purpose of this kind of machines. Don't throw it away!

  118. One word: by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
    Trebuchet.

    .
    Yeah, it's not ecologically sensitive, but it'd be a LOT of fun...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  119. Re:power hungry, yes. Trivial performance, no. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    The OP said he wanted a file server, not a video editor.

    (And I'm sure nobody would want it for video editing either, a quad-core PC can be built for what he'll save in electricity...)

    Use it as an ornament or junk it. That's about the two best options.

    --
    No sig today...
  120. Creative studio by V!NCENT · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could simply use it as a desktop. Linux has grown leaps and leaps and leaps forward and in many ways ahead of the Mac as a desktop, so read on.

    KDE SC 4.5 (about to be released in a few days/weeks) is leaps ahead of the Mac OS X 10.5 GUI. The only catch is that it is not minimalistic. If you want minimalism you have to pick Gnome with Gnome DO and set it to act like a docky. Put a Mac OS X wallpaper in place and install a Mac OS X theme. However KDE has focussed on more minimalism since KDE4 without sacrificing features.

    There is a KDE application for video editing that is unparalleled: Kdenlive: http://www.kdenlive.org/
    It slaughters Sony Vegas in functionality and is free of charge too. It may not be stable enough yet (version 0.7) so it might be a little bit of a bumpy ride at first.

    There is also a kick-ass music management application: AmaroK: http://amarok.kde.org/
    It is compatible with iPods that are not of the latest generation (USB encryption crap)

    KDE SC's default webbrowser is Konqueror, which, since KDE SC 4.5 also has WebKit support.
    Google's Chrome is now also runnable on Linux.
    If you don't like the Google privacy stuff than search for the Iron browser (they took the Chrome's source code and stripped it from any call home functionality)

    For managing photo's, use DigiKam: http://www.digikam.org/

    Personal information management: KDE PIM

    For personal finance: http://kmymoney2.sourceforge.net/index-home.html

    Office work isn't Linux' best aspect, so you could install OpenOffice.org. It is however the best Office Suit available for the PPC. It doesn't look all that good if your distro of choice hasn't supplied their own KDE4 integration into it.

    Now there are a lot of distributions, so what should you pick?
    The best and most stable KDE4 distro I have ever tried is Fedora. The default download option is with Gnone so search for a PPC KDE version. Because Fedora core is not using anything that is even remotely patented, you have to go to the RPMFusion website to add Adobe's Flash, MP3 and QuickTime codecs and whatnot: http://rpmfusion.org/RPM%20Fusion

    You can see pick your download here: http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/12/
    The Problem I am seeing here is that the current version of Fedora is 13 and the latest PPC64 builds are for Fedora 12. This leads to a little outdated software (1 year).

    --
    Here be signatures
  121. Here's what you need to do ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    burn it to ashes then start drinking heavily to kill off the neurons that hold the memory that you actually bought an Apple product.

  122. Home by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    Remove the fan and fill the unit with concrete. Get more and get some mortar and build a home or garage out of PCs using them as if they are bricks.

  123. I can help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you do decide to Linux it, I have done so (dual 2.0 GHz, Gentoo) and will assist. michael dot mounteney at yahoo dot com dot au

  124. Re: ... but you don't know what you're talking abo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, the G5 is a Power4+ microarchitecture... in some ways it's closer to IBM's latest Power7 or Intel Nehalem than Power6 or Intel's P4...

    You are showing a great lack of understanding of CPU micro architectures, please back your claims with facts.

  125. Debian PPC Works for Me by bedouin · · Score: 1

    I've been using it for years now on an old G3 iMac that's a file server, web server, VNC accessible, runs my BBS (yes, still do that), along with SETI@home and Transmission. I have no problems with OS X and it's my favorite desktop OS, but when it comes to server tasks I prefer Linux -- preferably Debian.

    It's a shame that the G5s lacked any true upgrade paths like the G3s and G4s did. The computer I'm writing this on right now came with 1 800mhz G4 CPU; now it has a dual G4 1.8ghz CPU. Still my day to day workhorse. Still getting great life out of a computer from 2002.

    So on that note -- I would obviously take it off your hands and put it on my desk :)

  126. Re:Or he could use it as a buttplug cabinet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. GOD YES. A thousand times YES.

  127. 200% CPU Usage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Install Mac OS X Server or Open Suse then run it as a File, LDAP, HTTP, VLC, Bittorrent, FTP, iTunes, Squid Cache proxy, SSH, Folding@Home, and anything-else sever and then do some serious Handbrake DVD ripping and video encoding of all your content.

  128. Sell it by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

    Sell it on Craigslist. You'd be amazed at what people are still paying for those hunks of junk.

  129. AIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's PPC can you run AIX on it?

    1. Re:AIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. The only Apple machines that could run any version of AIX were the Apple Network Servers in the late '90s.

  130. Sell it to a sucker by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sell it to a sucker while it still has resale value. Someone out there would surely like to use it as a Linux desktop. Personally, I just want the CASE. But I imagine even empty G5 cases are still worth some money.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  131. Re:Or he could use it as a buttplug cabinet. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

    Is that still considered funny?

    More now than ever.

    And it's not so much the joke that's funny,rather it's the sputtering, squealing, hands on hips, foot-stomping, outrage that makes it so hilarious.

     

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  132. Not a troll by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who is trolling? You have to be a total sucker to run a G5 unless you own it already, and even then it's probably not the best answer unless it's already part of your workflow, which is clearly NOT the case here. For probably no more money than what you have to pay for them used you can build a PC that will kick the shit out of them, and consume less power in the bargain. And of course, it won't run the latest OSX and nobody (statistically) is making new PPC apps. Having personally spent a lot of time behind the keyboard of a Dual G5 I know intimately that the versions of OSX that will run on it are total garbage, and that it's big, loud, and hot. I'd bet money that whoever modded me down has never even used one, and probably never seen one in operation.

    I guess I must have run across the iFanboy Mafia. Who still gives those iToolbags modpoints?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  133. How about turning it into a DVR? by vulpinemac · · Score: 1

    It's more than powerful enough to handle even HD video, and ElGato's EyeTV package does all the work of capturing it for you. If I can use a G4 Mac Mini for that purpose, a G5 should scream.

  134. I donated mine by alfredo · · Score: 1

    It is now used by the local Democratic party. I put Inkscape, GIMP, NeoOffice, and Scribus on it so they can use it for creating handouts and such.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  135. make it useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...do like I did: hang it out a window, fill it with plants.
    Watch the fanbois cringe in the street.

  136. Dual G5 by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

    I'm in the same boat. I've got a dual 1.8GHz PowerPC G5 that's basically just collecting dust. I'm thinking of installing MangOS or something similar on it.

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  137. Got cash? by chivo243 · · Score: 0

    Rip everything out and fill it with mac mini's.... three or four of the server editions! I'm sure the exhaust fans could still be used too! It would be a cool MOD project if you have the time and the money! '-}

    --
    Sig Hansen?
  138. Re:ubuntu? or just rsync? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or you can develop your code on a modern machine (where compile times are much faster) and run it with an account limited to using 1% of the CPU. Or if you really want a slow machine, you can get something cheap based on an AMD Geode or ARM core, and use under 10W for the entire system.

    Generally, though, testing your code on old machines makes you optimise for the wrong thing. On a modern machine, you can often get a large performance increase at the cost of a few MB of RAM. On a 486, that means that you're using all of your RAM, so the swapping makes the code slow. On a modern laptop, you're using 1% of your RAM for a 2 or more times speed boost. On a modern machine, offloading work to the GPU can make things faster and use less power. The same with tweaking SSE routines. With a 486, you won't be able to do either.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  139. Thermite by hviniciusg · · Score: 1

    Listen, there is nothing you could not have fun with thermite, just put half a kilo of it on top of the G5 and take it to the backyard, then wait for the nigth, power it up, run some CPU intensive application and wait for the fireworks.

  140. build a breakfast grill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take out cover.

    Install a coated metal plate.

    Play movie or compress 1TB file using bzip.

    Make pancake... :D yum...

  141. Donate themz shiz by Derpnooner · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that box cost a heck of a lot of Doll Hairs when you bought it. Send it to me - I'll take it off your hands. I still have a quadra 68000 plugged up. I will give it a good home. :)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, road forks you!
  142. Do yourself a favor... by Noryungi · · Score: 1

    Learn a 'new' operating system and install OpenBSD/macppc on it.

    Support should be outstanding, and you can rest knowing you have one heck of a secure G5.

    And, contrary to what most people think, OpenBSD is great for a personal workstation. Just my US$0.02...

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  143. Most obvious solution? by devon_halley · · Score: 0

    The case would make an awesome industrial strength cheese grater....

  144. Well by niteice · · Score: 1

    You could always grate cheese with it...

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
  145. Cheese Grater by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    Two words: cheese grater (or is it one word?).

    That is the G5's secondary purpose, you know... why else would they design it with all of those little holes?! ;-)

  146. Try Gentoo by xylo36 · · Score: 1

    I recently installed Gentoo on my old G5 and wrote a walk-through. Ultimately, it seems most practical to leave OS X on it, and compile Linux software for OS X as needed.

  147. Re:Three options... by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 2, Informative

    The haters are out this morning:

    "... Shrink, I want to kill. I mean, I wanna, I
    wanna kill. Kill. I wanna, I wanna see, I wanna see blood and gore and
    guts and veins in my teeth. Eat dead burnt bodies. I mean kill, Kill,
    KILL, KILL." And I started jumpin up and down yelling, "KILL, KILL,""

    http://www.arlo.net/resources/lyrics/alices.shtml :-)

    RISC blows CISC away: [skip or walk]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced_instruction_set_computing#RISC_design_philosophy

    - so much so, that they still bolt it on CISC [with some success]

    [Don't bother with the subheading "Diminishing benefits", it's BS, look at IBM's POWER]

    RISC vs. CISC:

    http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~eroberts/courses/soco/projects/2000-01/risc/risccisc/

    Our G5 x2 2.5 is soon to be a companion to our Xserve x2 1.33 [redundant DNS].
    Just add:

    Swift Data 200:

    http://www.transintl.com/store/category.cfm?Category=2490

    Inside your Power Mac G5:

    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1305

    "catastrophic coolant leak":

    http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/systems/G5_CoolantLeak_Repair/G5_CoolantLeak_Repair_p1.html

    --
    ~hylas
  148. Re:Or he could use it as a buttplug cabinet. by Concern+Is+A+Faggot · · Score: 0

    Considering most Mac users are trendy liberals, that kind of behavior is pretty much SOP for them, no?

    --
    Help! Help! I've been moded down by a Jewish conspiracy!
  149. Install FreeBSD and use it as a ZFS file server by bjelkeman · · Score: 1

    They just released FreeBSD 8.1with G5 support and with a bootloader that can boot from a ZFS file system. So make it into a power hungry ZFS file server.

    --
    Akvo.org - the open source for water and sanitation
  150. What about a dual dual core 2.5Ghz model? by MacOSXHead · · Score: 1

    Does anyone think this is worth keeping?

    -Tom

    1. Re:What about a dual dual core 2.5Ghz model? by toby · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a beautiful piece of hardware. I plan to keep mine alive and working for many years to come.

      --
      you had me at #!
  151. Aqarium? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    What? Nobody's suggesting the good ol' Macquarium?

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  152. Re:Most machines are horribly overpowered for desk by rockNme2349 · · Score: 1

    You do know how much power this thing draws right?

    --
    Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
  153. Re:Or he could use it as a buttplug cabinet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do have spare buttplugs now. Those uncomfortably large with jagged edges, real pain to insert on agony to draw out...

    After years of abusing myself with stability of Windows and ease of use of Linux, I finally migrated to OS X. But I felt that I was missing something... ...after a while I realized it was just the pain in my butt that I was so accustomed to. Luckily the assortment of these monster buttplugs solved that problem.

    I've now phased out of the use of them and only need a minor discomfort in my butt, so the monsters are now just gathering dust. The display case for them is an excellent idea!

  154. Spring for 10.5 Server by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    You can get Leopard Server with unlimited clients on Ebay for under 150 bucks. Why this instead of Linux? Because Apple will still be supporting it for awhile, and its an easy environment to run. The REAL question about what you should do with this box.... retire it, run Linux on it, or buy 10.5 Server.... depends on how much RAM is already in the machine. IIRC, those boxes would hold up to 32 gigs of memory, but if you've only got, say, one gig installed, it might not be worth your while to buy the memory to bring the machine up to speed. If there's enough RAM, a G5 PowerMac would make a nice server.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  155. Send it to SUNY! by Oldschoolwax · · Score: 0

    WOW, the State University of New York at Old Westbury would kill for some of these old boxes, as the Visual Arts Dept. is severely lacking in even old equipment! Please drop it in the mail!

  156. Debian by incubbus13 · · Score: 1

    I ran an apache webserver +clam av + spamassassin + qmail/squirrelmail on a pentium 233mhz box with 32 mb ram and about 5gig of HD space. That was Sarge, I think. But it ran beautiful for 2-3 years, every day, as a webserver for work. Then the drive seized solid. But? When did they last make 233's? 1995 or so? Pretty good run for it.

    K.

  157. MAME Weecade FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.koenigs.dk/mame/eng/stepweecade.htm

  158. Computer hoarding.. by polymeris · · Score: 1

    I have a sparcstation "pizzabox" I can get myself to part with. I still fire it up now and then, but I dont' really have any use for it.. keep it mostly because I like the design. I have thought of building modern hardware into the case, but it wouldn't be the same.. and the display connector is propietary, so i couldn't use that
    Any ideas of what I could do with it?

  159. I bet it can play Crystal Quest with a vengeance! by haaz · · Score: 1

    I bet it can play Crystal Quest with a vengeance!

    --
    -- haaz.
  160. I plan to continue running OS X on my dual G5 by toby · · Score: 1

    This very evening, I am installing a 40GB SSD for boot disk and low-power 1 TB drive for data. Upgrading from 10.4 to 10.5 (last that will run on PPC).

    This should give the G5 years more life - it's a wonderful, powerful box and my main desktop (though I keep a separate Linux PC for most day-job development).

    --
    you had me at #!
  161. Playing to the strengths of the hardware by neurosine · · Score: 1

    One of the beautiful things about pre-intel macs is their great digital signal processing capabilities. Just leave OSX on it, throw on Guitar Rig and Pro tools, and offer remastering to local bands. You could use it as a web server if ya want to...but why do something with it you could do with any old PC? Work with the strengths of the hardware, make it into an uber oscilloscope, plug in firewire pro audio equipment...I had a dual cpu G5 for awhile, and played with every flavour of linux I could find, but none of them worked with the hardware to a satisfactory degree. Many wouldn't even install. I loved playing with Guitar Rig on the thing though....it's a fantastic piece of pro audio kit, and can robustly emulate and interconnect with many more. Good luck playing around.

  162. Re:ubuntu? or just rsync? by segin · · Score: 1

    If your 486 is swapping, your machine is poorly configured. My machine (as mentioned in the grandparent post to this one) has 64MB of RAM. It never swaps. Not all data processing requires the entire data set to be resident in RAM, and even if it did, then the swap penalty means you'll get even better results when you get back to modern hardware. GPU offloading does not make sense in most situations. And since you're trying to push the idea that anything old must go as it is inefficent, then why should I code SSE routines in assembler, when coding in assembler is even older and less efficient than the 486 - and yes, you can get SSE optimizations in medium and high level languages, but you must write your code precisely in a manner that the compiler you use will realize to optimize it with SSE. In fact, I'd say your performance arguments here are making assumptions as to what the code in question does without having so much as one clue to the reality of the situation. Scientific engineering, molecular dynamics, audio/video codecs, number crunching, etc. might do good with these types of optimization but that's a really small subset of all the code that's ever been written.

    Your battlecry of "modern, modern, modern!" reminds me of someone's cry of "developers, developers, developers!". I wish I hadn't commented in this discussion, otherwise I would use my moderator points to mod you down for being like those idiots who declare your cell phone obsolete if you've had it for more than 120 days.

  163. Re:Or he could use it as a buttplug cabinet. by segin · · Score: 1

    And what's the problem with being a liberal? Or is it a problem to be a trendy liberal?

  164. Don't retire it by legolas_a20 · · Score: 1

    Buying that dell would also cost him 299$... According to the calculations above, he could run his g5 on that money for 2 years straight and it wouldn't be more expensive (and that's without counting the electricity cost of running that new dell for the same time).

  165. Sell it by Servo · · Score: 1

    A G5 isn't that old and is still pretty powerful. It still has a lot of life left in it. If you can't figure out what to do with a high end workstation from 1 or 2 processor generations ago then you're best bet is to sell it to somebody who does.

    If you're not going to sell it, put a more recent version of Mac OS X Server on it that supports the G5 CPU and put it to use for whatever you need it to do.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  166. Slackintosh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you thought about useing slackintosh? i use it on my g3 imac and it works perfect, if you used slackware before, slackintosh is almost a perfect replica. ive found it to be the most stable and very fast compared to other PPC distros, and dont forget you can still dual boot

  167. I know what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got a shotgun?

  168. Re:Or he could use it as a buttplug cabinet. by lunatic1969 · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your intelligent and well thought out response. I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  169. you have to include the cost of air conditioning by tonyt3 · · Score: 1

    Many people have noted that the G5 machines are power hungry. However, in most cases it will take roughly ten times as much electricity to pump the heat out of your office (or house). This makes the pay-back time much shorter for buying a new, more efficient machine unless you live in a cold region.

  170. Use it for Audio Production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac G5 mac great Audio Production computer still. Garageband, logic, protools, etc. that are a version or two back from the most recent will run great on there. In fact, there is a pretty good used market for them on ebay and craigslist for this purpose.

    I use a G4 MDD every week for multi-track audio production.

  171. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about put MORPH OS or AROS on it and run an Amiga like machine?

  172. Re:Three options... by trouser · · Score: 1

    ...and they all moved away from me on the bench.

    --
    Now wash your hands.
  173. Old? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    WTF? If you think it is old give it to me! My most recent computer is a G4 iBook. And as someone else said, install OS X on it. Tiger, though aging is still very servicable and is supported. What is your new computer?

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  174. Hardy Heron by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    If memory serves me correctly Ubuntu Hardy Heron is the last Ubuntu distribution that supports the PPC architecture. Not sure if that is helpful at all. I still say that a G5 is a perfectly useful machine. I'm still using a couple of Graphite G4s for various not so processor intensive purposes.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  175. numbers by toby · · Score: 1

    Installing OS X 10.5 on the dual G5 with SSD took only 11 minutes.

    With SSD as boot drive, boots from video to login in 18 seconds, still a bit slower than I expected.

    --
    you had me at #!
  176. Re:Three options... by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

    (...) till I said, "And creating a nuisance." And they all came back, shook my hand, and we had a great time on the bench, talkin about crime, mother stabbing, father raping, all kinds of groovy things that we was talking about on the bench. And everything was fine, we was smoking cigarettes and all kinds of things, until the Sargeant came over, had some paper in his hand, held it up and said ...

    --
    ~hylas
  177. obviously... by mikhailvs93 · · Score: 1

    vector linux.