Follow the links on the page you provided, and you'll see that Prism isn't supported past Firefox 3.6.*.
Also, Mozilla themselves said that Prism is now Chromeless.
I used to use KDE, but I switched away when I realized that none of the apps I use are Qt-based. Let me know when I can use a Qt-based Chrome or Firefox, a Qt-based Vim, and when SWT/Qt is stable (with a Qt-based Eclipse release). Until then, I'll continue using Gnome.
Plus they are really pushing Akonadi hard, and I don't want to run it. And so many bugs I have voted on the KDE bugtracker that never get fixed...
It's really too bad. I love Qt as a toolkit.
Ah, I think I see what you're saying. The banned player should still be able to play single-player campaign without the ability to gain achievements. That would be fair, yes. Maybe they just didn't think of that... I know I didn't.
You're getting too caught up in the details of the analogy. Fine, let's say they don't take your gun, but they revoke your shooting license. Or we could switch the analogy to something like competitive sprints, where all they can do is ban you from tracks.
I actually own a gun. Your analogy isn't quite right.
Let's say you like to shoot competitively. Someone finds out that you've been cheating in order to get your trophies. Your trophies are taken away, and your gun is taken away, but you can to pay $60 to buy another gun.
Losing the money is the risk you take when you cheat, I guess. It pays for Blizzard to keep things fair, though, so I am still all for it.
Don't know where you're getting your data from... If that's a joke, it's not funny. Anyway, count me on the side of Neoprofin and many other Starcraft 2 players that are happy with Blizzard's actions.
In my opinion, yes it does. It's a competitive game. There are many people, including me, who are proud of our "achievements." Someone cheating to get the same reward is grounds for banning. It's the same way in most things competitive... I'm not saying you should buy the game, but I'm saying I don't agree with your particular beef with Blizzard. I'm a customer, and I approve of what they're doing.
In order to make it through the day, do these Japanese rely on a bunch of people calling them? Somehow I don't think phonecalls are going to motivate a "sluggardly housewife" (from TFA) to do more housework.
Also, where are the examples? This article is no good without examples.
While this is a good observation, I believe there is an argument against this. Oracle has a wide variety of supported platforms. Wouldn't it be more cost-effective to focus development efforts on Linux rather than keeping Solaris alive? They are going to have to maintain Linux either way.
The question, though, is whether a fork would be successful. Without the Sun-paid developers, would OpenSolaris keep its development momentum?
My guess is that it would not.
My notebook computer is that much closer to devolving into a pen-and-paper notebook. I mean, you can already write on tablets. Make them a bit thinner, and more bendy, and what's the difference?
Re:time to port gnome!
on
Qt Becomes LGPL
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
Slashdot Mirror
Follow the links on the page you provided, and you'll see that Prism isn't supported past Firefox 3.6.*. Also, Mozilla themselves said that Prism is now Chromeless.
I've been using: ... />
<figure>
<img
<figcaption>this is a picture with a caption</figcaption>
</figure>
I used to use KDE, but I switched away when I realized that none of the apps I use are Qt-based. Let me know when I can use a Qt-based Chrome or Firefox, a Qt-based Vim, and when SWT/Qt is stable (with a Qt-based Eclipse release). Until then, I'll continue using Gnome. Plus they are really pushing Akonadi hard, and I don't want to run it. And so many bugs I have voted on the KDE bugtracker that never get fixed... It's really too bad. I love Qt as a toolkit.
Looking at their subversion repository, I don't think OpenChange is dead. They just don't seem to give news updates very often. http://websvn.openchange.org/log.php?repname=OpenChange&path=/trunk/&isdir=1&
Not to be confused with the *other* development-related Fabric at http://fabfile.org/
Ah, I think I see what you're saying. The banned player should still be able to play single-player campaign without the ability to gain achievements. That would be fair, yes. Maybe they just didn't think of that... I know I didn't.
You're getting too caught up in the details of the analogy. Fine, let's say they don't take your gun, but they revoke your shooting license. Or we could switch the analogy to something like competitive sprints, where all they can do is ban you from tracks.
I actually own a gun. Your analogy isn't quite right. Let's say you like to shoot competitively. Someone finds out that you've been cheating in order to get your trophies. Your trophies are taken away, and your gun is taken away, but you can to pay $60 to buy another gun. Losing the money is the risk you take when you cheat, I guess. It pays for Blizzard to keep things fair, though, so I am still all for it.
Nobody, you say? You shouldn't exaggerate, my friend. I care about them.
Don't know where you're getting your data from... If that's a joke, it's not funny. Anyway, count me on the side of Neoprofin and many other Starcraft 2 players that are happy with Blizzard's actions.
In my opinion, yes it does. It's a competitive game. There are many people, including me, who are proud of our "achievements." Someone cheating to get the same reward is grounds for banning. It's the same way in most things competitive... I'm not saying you should buy the game, but I'm saying I don't agree with your particular beef with Blizzard. I'm a customer, and I approve of what they're doing.
In order to make it through the day, do these Japanese rely on a bunch of people calling them? Somehow I don't think phonecalls are going to motivate a "sluggardly housewife" (from TFA) to do more housework. Also, where are the examples? This article is no good without examples.
Maybe the folks at Oracle use KDE.
He *has* forked it. Regardless of Monty's intentions, I'm growing tired of seeing this argument stated over and over.
Really? I don't see anyone claiming that it should be called Linux/Chrome...
It would have been like Microsoft dropping WinFS for Vista, right?
file:// indicates the protocol. The third slash indicates that it is an absolute path.
While this is a good observation, I believe there is an argument against this. Oracle has a wide variety of supported platforms. Wouldn't it be more cost-effective to focus development efforts on Linux rather than keeping Solaris alive? They are going to have to maintain Linux either way.
The question, though, is whether a fork would be successful. Without the Sun-paid developers, would OpenSolaris keep its development momentum? My guess is that it would not.
Dude, this was a 12 year old *girl*.
My notebook computer is that much closer to devolving into a pen-and-paper notebook. I mean, you can already write on tablets. Make them a bit thinner, and more bendy, and what's the difference?
Qt Designer