Slashdot Mirror


Ink Breakthrough Heralds Bendy PC Screens

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers claim to have developed a type of soluble semiconductor ink which could help to make bendable computer screens a reality. Developed at Polyera and BASF Future Business, the ink carries an N-Type negative charge. Previously, semiconductor inks have only been able to carry a positive charge. The new ink can be printed onto any flexible material, including plastic and paper, using only a modified ink-jet printer."

140 comments

  1. How much will this new ink cost? by Swordopolis · · Score: 5, Funny

    As if I didn't already spend enough money on those damn cartridges.

    --
    Alchemist: Be Thou For the People
    1. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can't be more than the $8,000 a gallon we're all currently paying.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Swordopolis · · Score: 1

      SHHHHHHH! Don't tempt them!

      --
      Alchemist: Be Thou For the People
    3. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Somewhat off topic, but I just had to share.

      As if I didn't already spend enough money on those damn cartridges.

      That right there is why I decided to purchase a laser printer. The Brother MFC-7840W may cost $300 up front ($238 from Amazon w/free shipping), but the cartridges are only $46 and last for thousands of pages. (Standard cartridge is rated at 1,500 pages, though you can get more out of it.) In addition, the unit is an office-quality copier, scanner, and fax machine. All over a wireless network.

      I've gotten into the habit of scanning my documents to PDF, then sticking the original paper version into a "safe place" where I'm sure it will never be found again. Which doesn't worry me because I can electronically pull the document and reprint. Because it's a laser, reprinting is not an issue now that I don't have to wait all friggin' day for my printouts!

      Sure, there's no color. But it's not like I've been trying to get a color printer anyway. Compare to the HP and Lexmark I had previously where the ink cost twice as much, "dried up" before I managed to print more than 50 pages (stupid protection circuitry), had the flimsiest of paper trays that could only hold a dozen sheets, would only work if both the color and BW cartridges were full, and regularly crumpled the paper and jammed while they ponderously swung the print head back and forth.

      I'm never going back to inkjets. Ever. I'd rather live without a printer than subject myself to such horrors again. If anyone here is thinking of making a printer purchase, consider upgrading to a laser. You'll save yourselves a fortune in the long run, and you'll send a message to these greedy printer companies that we don't want to deal with their crappy ink cartridges any longer.

    4. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by ProudWhiteTrash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I purchased a Kodak ESP 9 All-in-One Printer for $299. I am amazed at how cheap the ink is for it compared to my old Epson. $20 gets you a black and color cartridge with 120 sheets of 4" x 6" photo paper. You have to put a little more money up front but in the long run I think it will save a tan on $$$$$.

    5. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Urza9814 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seconded, though I prefer the Brother HL-2040. Got it from Amazon for $70. Hell, by the time I finished the toner it came with it had paid for itself. It's rated for 2,500 pages, and I get them refilled locally for $30. Compare that to HP's ink cartridges, which will run you $30+ for around 800 pages. So, you pay $90 for 2400 pages worth of HP ink, or $70 for a laser printer that comes with a full toner cartridge (and it was a _full_ cartridge, not one of those crappy half cartridges). I still have the old inkjet around for if I need color...though I can't remember the last time I used it...but it's actually cheaper to buy a laser printer and throw it out whenever you run out of ink than it is to buy ink for an inkjet. Plus my laser has _much_ better linux compatibility (plugged it in and it worked...the inkjet I've never gotten to work) and it's a lot more durable.

    6. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      That right there is why I decided to purchase a laser printer.

      Seconded. It's been said a million times (at least by me), but if you print lots, get a laser. If you don't, have Walmarts/Kinkos/the local shop do it for you.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    7. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by dissy · · Score: 1

      I'm never going back to inkjets. Ever. I'd rather live without a printer than subject myself to such horrors again. If anyone here is thinking of making a printer purchase, consider upgrading to a laser. You'll save yourselves a fortune in the long run, and you'll send a message to these greedy printer companies that we don't want to deal with their crappy ink cartridges any longer.

      I can't agree more!

      I've had an old HP LaserJet 4mv for the last 15 years, and only just now am having issues finding toner for such an old printer in local stores.

      I was just looking at color lasers recently (hey, color is cool!) and found a nice one similarly spec'ed like yours but without the scanner/fax part, for $250. Sadly, black ink is $48, and there are 3 color toner carts that are $42 each. Thats like $200 in ink, which for now is making me delay the purchase.

      But I have firmly decided to do without any working printer instead of buying a cheap inkjet. Never ever again.

    8. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by H3g3m0n · · Score: 1

      When you consider that you only need to print once then never again, just keep uploading documents to the printed screen, you will probably save money.

      --
      cat /dev/urandom > .sig
    9. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Disclaimer: I'm in the remanufactured ink and laser industry

      Here are a few routes you can go:
      I prefer HP. If you have to have color, get an HP Business Inkjet Printer. They take the HP 88XL black cartridge, which is rated at around 2500 pages. An aftermarket cartridge should cost $20. This matches the price per page of an entry level laser cartridges, such as an HP Q2612A.

      For anything else, eBay is your friend. More modern laser cartridges tend to give you less pages for more dollars. Cartridges like the 92298X (which are very old) do over 8800 pages (at 5% page coverage, think newspaper text). A decent aftermarket 98X should cost ~$60.

      If you need a color laser, I prefer the HP printer that takes the Q6000 series. They are not too big machines, and the toner isn't too expensive.

      If you want to reman your own (I highly suggest you don't), A few of the Brother toner cartridges would be a way to go. Most of them are :

      a. Dump in Toner
      b. Reset a gear
      c. Print.

      The older ones don't have a drum built into the toner cartridge, which also helps for a home reman.

      Less than a cent per page is easily achieved, even if you buy decent quality re manufactured product.

      Uh oh, here comes my boss. Back to work.

    10. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by aperion · · Score: 1

      What sits idle better for long period of time? Does toner start to clump together if you haven't printed in a month? Ink start to soak through? I go through a cartridge maybe every year, maybe two. our printer is typically regulated to map print outs on the way to somewhere I've never been.

    11. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Hear hear!

      I have an ancient NEC Superscript 660i laser printer. I think I got it in '96 or so.

      This thing is so old the only way to install the actual proper NEC drivers is to download FLOPPY DISK IMAGES and run them from 1.44MB discs.

      It's so old they only have drivers for Win 3.1/9x, but that's OK because I can use a standard HP Laserjet 4p driver with it.

      It's so old that the paper hopper is missing/broken, I am using a playing card as a paper guide, and I am holding the front panel in place with scotch tape.

      But guess what? Damn thing still prints PERFECTLY after all these years, and I think I've replaced the toner only twice, and for 3 years or so it was used as a daily workhorse at a tech startup.

      That being said, I do have an inkjet (Canon, more expensive up front than Epson but cheaper operating costs) I use when I really need colour.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    12. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, I used to have an Epson laser printer. The manufacturer stopped producing toner after only a year or two of service. Which was really enough to peeve anyone off, considering how much they cost back then. By remanufacturing the same cartridge over and over, the printer was able to last for YEARS after Epson gave up on the unit. And since the cartridges held so much ink back them (big bastards, too!) remanufacturing only needed to be done every year or so. Thankfully the drum held out too (it was one of those combination cartridges) because that would have been hard to replace.

      Your suggestion for an HP printer is well taken, but I've got to be honest with you. I just don't need the hassle. Changing the ink cartridges is only half the battle. Dealing with drivers going bonkers, protection circuitry, broken parts, feed jams, ink splots, slow prints, and other typical inkjet issues just isn't worth my time. Much better to have a laser which feeds paper through at a good clip. Especially a nice unit like these Brothers that are well supported on Mac/PC/Linux and scalable to nearly any situation I can come up with. Amazingly, the software isn't half-bad either! (I think that's the first time I've ever said THAT about a printer.)

      So thank you for the suggestion, but I think I'll hang on to this laser. I will consider remanufacturing though. :-)

    13. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if I can give a good answer on the Brother yet, but my experience with laser printers in the past has been that Laser toner holds up better over time than inkjet cartridges. It's not entirely clear if the ink dries up or it's completely the fault of the protection circuitry, but the inkjets I've used stop putting sufficient ink on the paper if I let them sit for a month or two. I have never had that problem with a laser. In fact, I've previously let lasers sit for months at a time and still gotten a good quality print out of them.

      Standard disclaimers apply, but I think you'll get a much better experience with a laser printer.

    14. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm only interested in black and white prints so this doesn't apply to me, but you may want to be wary of the cost of Kodak paper. The word on the street is that their ink costs are lower, but they make up the difference by requiring you to use their special paper to get good colors. Alternative photo papers don't appear to work because of a difference in the texturing of the paper. (The printer can't feed it properly.)

      The other issue to watch out for is driver bizarreness. Various reports have complained of odd problems with the printer becoming unavailable, missing parts of the print job, PC crashes, and other driver-related oddities.

      So as long as you can either fix, workaround, or otherwise avoid these issues, it should be a good printer. However, I still recommend a laser if you don't need color. :-)

    15. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I've gotten into the habit of scanning my documents to PDF, then sticking the original paper version into a "safe place" where I'm sure it will never be found again.

      Guy: What's that (points to iron door in wall)? AKAImBatman: disused furnace. Guy: What do you use it for? AKAImBatman: Document storage.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right! Thanks for the chuckle. :-)

    17. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed the drum made it this long. I mean, the drums on those old lasers were usually pretty hearty, but 13 years is pushing it! :-)

    18. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by phulegart · · Score: 1

      Laser printers and copiers sit better over time, compared to ink-based printers. Of course, moisture does play a part in this. If you move the laser copier/printer out to the shed in back, and leave it for a year, yes, you are going to have problems. If you close the door to your office, and go on sabbatical for 6 months, when you come back that laser copier/printer will print just fine.

      The ink in the channels, the ink in the print head, and in some cases in the very cartridge (Xerox had these thin little ink cartridges that would dry up in a month or so, once opened, if they weren't used) will dry and clog the system, forcing one to change the print heads or more. In both cases, the best thing to do is just remove the toner/ink cartridges if you KNOW you are going to store the printer. It is just good to know if you take a modicum of care, the Toner will be good when you need it again. The ink won't

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    19. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Great, now that I'm heavily invested in paper shredders THIS comes along... Well, I guess I'll be OK until the banks finish screwing us all, they will need the shredders for old stuff like evidence of wrong doing.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    20. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I purchased a Samsung ML-2851ND for $36 (marked down from $199 on clearance). High capacity cartridges cost ~99$; they're rated at 2000 pages, but I get around 3000 pages out of them.

      This printer is monochrome w/ Network and Duplex; absolutely awesome deal. Never going back to inkjet printers again; they're such a waste of money.

    21. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially a nice unit like these Brothers that are well supported on Mac/PC/Linux and scalable to nearly any situation I can come up with. Amazingly, the software isn't half-bad either! (I think that's the first time I've ever said THAT about a printer.)

      Yup, those CUPS-wrapper-driver Brother printers are very nice. Inexpensive and extremely versatile.

    22. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points and if you weren't already +5, I'd mod this up.

      Hear hear!

      I did the same thing in about 2001, actually. I've never looked back. Color is useful once in a blue while, but hell, if I really NEED something printed in color, I just put it on a memory stick and take it to Walmart.

      Inkjets suck. I detest them. Laser all the way! Plus my newest one has a crappy but useful duplexer that cuts my paper consumption in half, and further decreases the cost of care and feeding.

      I find I buy toner about every three years, and by the time I wear out a drum unit, it's cheaper to buy a faster and more feature-packed printer than buy a drum for the old one.

    23. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by slashtivus · · Score: 1
      Since we are already off-topic:

      I had an old ink-jet way back in the day I bought used for $50.00 (I do NOT remember the make / model) that had an ink supply in a plastic cartridge that looked eerily like a blood bag.

      It even had a tractor drive for continuous sheet paper. It printed pretty awfully but it was good enough for machine shop work-folder instructions. We used it for years, and it never actually ran out of ink. IIRC the tractor motor died eventually.

    24. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Mozk · · Score: 1

      And you can only get 146 greyscale pictures out of a single cartridge!

      --
      No existe.
    25. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      To get the best quality output form inkjet printers requires coated papers. There are a number of finishes available, but most of them use paper coated in a ceramic slurry on one side. Price ill vary according to manufacturer and grade/weight of paper.

      You can use 'laser' grade paper with inkjets, but won't get the same sharpness or colourfastness as you would with coated stock. It really depends on how important that is for your document whether it is worth the investment.

      'Laser' grade paper is also dusty by comparison and can cause damage to the print heads or increase the chance of nozzles blocking on inkjet cartridges.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    26. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I can't remember for certain whether this applies to the Superscripts, but many desktop later printer cartridges incorporate the drum, especially those with a higher yield (in excess of 4k pages).

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    27. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's way over 8000!

      (Fuck you US version. The original JP ver says 8000, and so does the Hebrew version)

    28. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Re your sig: Don't forget "its" and "it's".)

    29. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Hey, you can buy color laser printers starting at 99€ ($128,54) here in Germany! They are not great, but you can always go a little bit up in price. You'd still be in a good price range. (Like the first HP, coming up on the list,) And they can't be worse than ink printers, can they? ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    30. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      The toner cartridge was very large, it probably could've included the drum. I wouldn't know how to tell the difference though. :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    31. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      I got the Brother 9840CDW for pretty much the same reasons and am happy with that decision. But the inkjet still has it's place. Al you do is wait for one to go on sale, like the Brother MFC 465CN which was on sale here for less than the price of the ink cartridges that it contained. Then sell the ink cartridges - now the net cost of printer/scanner/etc. is $0 and for that you get a great collection of servos, gears, stepper motors, scan sensors, rubber rollers etc. - all FREE!

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    32. Re:How much will this new ink cost? by lsatenstein · · Score: 0

      I have a simple question. In a family of laser printers (brother, HP, other), is the Black toner used within the one family universal, so I may buy an older cartridge version which I know holds more toner at lower cost, and then do a transfer, e.g. Re-manufacture?

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. Remind me again... by Jonah+Bomber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why, exactly, do we need bendy computer screens?

    1. Re:Remind me again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      in 15 years you'll be wondering how we survived without them.

    2. Re:Remind me again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Portability. Was that really so hard to figure out?

    3. Re:Remind me again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well obviously it's so that we can... umm.. well, you see a screen that bends would be... Oh I know! You could use one for... Hey, what's that behind you? *runs away*

    4. Re:Remind me again... by Swordopolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Precisely. Imagine being able to fit your computer screen into a purse or backpack. Or a big-screen display into a poster tube.

      --
      Alchemist: Be Thou For the People
    5. Re:Remind me again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Imagine a flexible screen. Now, imagine a flexible screen that slowly degrades every time you bend it (whether you deliberately bend the screen or accidentally). Now imagine planned obsolescence. Now imagine two companies, one makes a durable product that's expensive, the other makes a cheap disposable product. Which one is more profitable?

    6. Re:Remind me again... by c_jonescc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One reason is so that you can roll it up for small storage. Just think if you could take a 30" monitor with you in your carry on.... All the real estate you'd ever want with a netbook while traveling.

      I worked on LCDs for years, and the grail was always the rollup screen. One nifty use is that your window shades can be your displays - during the day the sun is your light source (talk about green!), and when you use the display you're shutting out the outside light automatically. At night or for interiors you can light traditionally.

      --
      Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
    7. Re:Remind me again... by TBoon · · Score: 1

      I don't think *computer screens* is where this will be used first. But depending on power-requirements I can easily imagine "designer" watches with displays pretty much all around them and other utterly useless (but oh-so-geeky) pieces of clothing.

    8. Re:Remind me again... by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same reason we need bendy paper.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Remind me again... by MadJeff451 · · Score: 1

      Why, exactly, do we need bendy computer screens?

      So that Val Kilmer can navigate the surface of Mars, of course.

    10. Re:Remind me again... by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Ever think of what a newspaper could be like if it was simply a large, foldable, flexible screen on which you download your daily news? Just think - get a "newspaper" delivered once per week. It downloads the most recent news constantly via wifi or some type of cell adapter (think Minority Report). Now the failing newspaper companies suddenly have a way to bring back the morning paper, and now, they can sell unlimited pages of ads and fill it with unlimited content, all accessible via page flip buttons, and if they can figure out how to use capacitance sense pad tech with this, imagine touching a hyperlink with your finger on a page to read more about an article. Imagine the newspapers simply fitting everything as they want it with a "more" link at the bottom of each article. Now do you see how this could be used?

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    11. Re:Remind me again... by ShadeOfBlue · · Score: 1

      One thing I think would be really cool is basically an iPhone with tactile feedback. Imagine a grid of small click-able buttons behind a flexible touch screen. Software can then match up a virtual keyboard, menu items, etc. to the underlying buttons, so that you can both feel when you've clicked and tell where it thinks you clicked based on the way the screen depresses.

    12. Re:Remind me again... by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bah. If stone tablets were good enough for the 10 Commandments, they're good enough for me.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    13. Re:Remind me again... by Swordopolis · · Score: 1

      Join the Mobile Infantry and save the Galaxy. Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?

      --
      Alchemist: Be Thou For the People
    14. Re:Remind me again... by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Darn, same thoughts exactly! The rolled-up display (with integrated "X-ray"-like scanner) was way, way, way cool.

    15. Re:Remind me again... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I imagine it would be about as annoying as trying to read online articles right now. Reading 2 paragraphs interrupted by 2 or 3 ads, and then having to hit next page through more of the same 5 times to read what should have been a 1 page article.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    16. Re:Remind me again... by grangerg · · Score: 1

      Because wrap-around screens would be really cool for games, if nothing else. I would like to see a "dry" version of what the ProtoType This guys did in their virtual sea adventure episode. A hemispherical screen (minus the projector of course) would be awesome.

    17. Re:Remind me again... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to pack four bricks to pin down the corners of your portable bendy monitor so it doesn't roll back up again.

    18. Re:Remind me again... by troll8901 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... imagine touching a hyperlink with your finger on a page to read more about an article ... with a "more" link at the bottom of each article.

      And readers can comment on each article, and rate one another's comments up or down, and label them as Interesting, Insightful, etc.

      Now do you see how this could be used?

      Not really. Who's going to use such features?

    19. Re:Remind me again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      based on the way the screen depresses.

      Your current LCD screen does it too!

    20. Re:Remind me again... by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine a combat flight simulator with a bendy screen that covers a whole hemisphere! There is cool . . . and then there is insanely cool!!!!

    21. Re:Remind me again... by jlidberg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally you can get a working printscreen on your pc

    22. Re:Remind me again... by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 1

      Origami!

      --
      BM3
    23. Re:Remind me again... by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Join the Mobile Infantry and save the Galaxy. Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?

      Where do I sign up to squash bugs?

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    24. Re:Remind me again... by Samah · · Score: 1

      Bah. If stone tablets were good enough for the 10 Commandments, they're good enough for me.

      Yeah, but didn't Moses break the tablets? If he'd asked God to print them on a bendy screen he probably would have had to bash it until there were enough dead pixels.
      (Footnote: this requires electricity...)

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    25. Re:Remind me again... by aj50 · · Score: 1

      What do I want it lying down for?

      I'd expect some sort of fold out frame

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    26. Re:Remind me again... by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      The one with the best marketing division.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    27. Re:Remind me again... by Bindox · · Score: 0

      Remember the movie Red Planet (with Val Kilmer in 2002)? The stranded astronauts were out walking the land and Val whips out the tube shaped computer and pulls the screen out like its an Old Testament scroll. Its a computer screen. Think about having one that you mount like a projector screen, only now you won't need the projector.

      The questions from people who don't fathom what a new technology could be used for always precede massive adoption: "Why would we need to carry our phones in our car?", "Why would anyone want to have music on a device you have to carry around?".

      Know anyone who does NOT want a cell phone? Know anybody that does NOT have or want an iPod/MP3 player?

    28. Re:Remind me again... by NigelTheFrog · · Score: 1

      Kinda like a Blackberry Storm, but actually good. Stupid clicking screen...

    29. Re:Remind me again... by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why, exactly, do we need bendy computer screens?

      You got the... the light... from the console... keep you... lift you up. They shine like... ... little angels...

      --
      My hand to God. Baby geese. Goslings. They were juggled.
    30. Re:Remind me again... by Flentil · · Score: 1

      If portability was really the problem, shouldn't we be looking at micro projectors instead, or even better, imax glasses?

    31. Re:Remind me again... by SeePage87 · · Score: 1

      +5 funny? I'd have given it insightful. He's exactly right in his analogy, the flexibility of paper as a writing surface over more rigid surfaces adds a great deal to it's usefulness. An ultra thin and flexible screen would add just as much over these comparably huge and cumbersome LCDs we're using now.

  3. Uhm... by McCat · · Score: 1

    "Which could help make bendable computer screens a reality" -- Is it just me, or, aren't bendable screens already a reality?

    1. Re:Uhm... by Swordopolis · · Score: 1

      Prototypes != Mass Production

      --
      Alchemist: Be Thou For the People
    2. Re:Uhm... by idontgno · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, I think the crucial difference between what TFA is talking about and you're talking about is bendable screens that keep working after you bend them.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:Uhm... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find a lot of mass production products on E ink's website (see the products of Citizen and Seiko for examples of bended screens).

    4. Re:Uhm... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      If you can't already bend your screen, unbend it and have a working screen, you haven't really learned to steal from the PFY yet.

  4. How does this help? by dragonjujotu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I missing something? Even TFA doesn't say how this is a major step forward for bendable computer screens.

    --
    Yes, I am obsessed with ellipses.
    1. Re:How does this help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've not RTFA, but it sounds like, since a transistor is basically a p-n-p junction, we only had the p-doped before in a bendy way, but this means we now can do n-doped, and thus bendy transistors. Transistors of course being quite important for deciding what each pixel will have on it. I'd imagine this will be used for e-ink or such technologies though, since LCDs generally need a backlight to look good, and lights would likely make the thing too bulky for non-hulk people to bend.

      mfh is right though, it makes it evil.

    2. Re:How does this help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can print the screen circuitry onto a flexible surface.

  5. Cool, but... by lixee · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article is very light, but let it be known that N-type organic semiconductors have conductivities that are orders of magnitude lower than their P-type counterparts. They are usually much less stable too. If they managed to get something that doesn't need inert athmosphere, encapsulation and can transport a fraction of charges the p-type conjugated materials do, it would be a breakthrough. But I'm really not holding my breath. As someone working in the field, it sounds like vaporware to me.

    --
    Res publica non dominetur
    1. Re:Cool, but... by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Flexible screens are like the fusion power of consumer electronics: always just a few years away.

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
  6. "Could" help, yeah. by Proteus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's possible this "could" lead to bendable screens, but the technology isn't complete enough to be used in that way.

    Saying this tech could lead to bendable screens is a lot like saying that nanotubes "could lead to" a space elevator.

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:"Could" help, yeah. by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yea, and leaving my house "could lead to" a girlfriend, but who wants to take that chance?

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    2. Re:"Could" help, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i feel like I've seen this article on Slashdot every month or so, for as long as I've been reading it

    3. Re:"Could" help, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, and leaving my parents' house "could lead to" a girlfriend, but who wants to take that chance?

      C'mon, this is /.

      I fessed up for you.

    4. Re:"Could" help, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep me posted every time you leave the house, then.

    5. Re:"Could" help, yeah. by Pebby · · Score: 1

      Tiger-attack-preventing rocks could lead to a decrease in tiger attacks?

  7. Holy crap! by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Funny

    the ink carries an N-Type negative charge. Previously, semiconductor inks have only been able to carry a positive charge.

    Do you have any idea what this means?! The possibilities are mind-boggling! You'll be able to put the batteries in backwards!

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Holy crap! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you have any idea what this means?! The possibilities are mind-boggling! You'll be able to put the batteries in backwards!

      This reminds me of a funny story (funny to hardware geek types, at least)... when I was about 13 or so, I was playing around with circuit diagrams and came up with an incredible invention that I felt sure was going to make me a fortune!

      I invented a way for batteries to be put into a device in any direction. I showed my invention, that used only four diodes, to my electronic engineer father and his engineer friend who happened to be there. His friend said, laughing, "Yeah, I've needed one of those on occasion." I couldn't figure out why they found it funny.

      (of course, I had just invented the full wave rectifier, not typically used for batteries, alas)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Holy crap! by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally, Trekkies are vindicated. You can reverse the polarity!

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    3. Re:Holy crap! by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They should use them though, not having to worry about which way round batteries went would be nice.

      I wonder if you could incorporate the rectifier into the battery itself, and get a battery that could be inserted into any device either way round?

    4. Re:Holy crap! by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you at least add the obvious pun? The possibilities are mind-bending!

      --
      ^_^
    5. Re:Holy crap! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      They should use them though, not having to worry about which way round batteries went would be nice.

      They probably don't because there's a power loss from the diodes. You're going to get some amount of current flowing through the reversed diodes. The convenience of having reversible batteries is not worth the loss in battery life.

      I wonder if you could incorporate the rectifier into the battery itself, and get a battery that could be inserted into any device either way round?

      Well, that would only help ensure that positive and negative are *always* at a certain side of the battery, regardless of internal chemistry. :)

      (Sorry, not trying to be (rudely) sarcastic... in other words, the point of the diode set-up is to resolve polarity within the device... it doesn't do any good to resolve it on the battery, it's already resolved there!)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    6. Re:Holy crap! by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Good job I'm only a programmer and not an circuit designer then huh?

  8. At last! by db10 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'll be able to roll up my monitor and stick it in my bunghole!

  9. Devolution by gomek-ramek · · Score: 1

    My notebook computer is that much closer to devolving into a pen-and-paper notebook. I mean, you can already write on tablets. Make them a bit thinner, and more bendy, and what's the difference?

    1. Re:Devolution by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My notebook computer is that much closer to devolving into a pen-and-paper notebook.

      I believe that's the point. If we can merge the advantages of paper with the advantages of electronic information, there will no longer be such thing as "paper copies". Imagine having a sheet of paper to scribble on. Now imagine that someone half-way around the world can see what you're scribbling. Imagine an architect rolling out blueprints for a client, then making changes right there as they speak. Imagine being able to add annotations to any document without damaging the original. Imagine being able to put up an advertisement poster that never needs to be removed.

      Some of these items can be partially accomplished today with laptops and various display technologies. However, electronic paper would drive down the price of displays and increase the convenience and effectiveness of the interface.

    2. Re:Devolution by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Not to mention reducing waste. Although once these are ubiquitous and large enough, I imagine the billboard companies will be asking for a bailout.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
  10. Wouldn't it be neat to print out circuit boards? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to me that instead of flexible computer screens (which already exist), this could be more interesting to the hobbyist market where you could sell an inkjet printer that had conductive ink cartridges to print out circuit boards for people to play with.

    Sure, there are already low cost fab options out there, and people can always use breadboards, but this seems like it would let you do small one-off projects that aren't obviously built on a breadboard.

    Just print out the board (with included markings for all of the components), attach the components somehow (solder won't burn through paper, but I don't know about the ink--is it heat resistant?) and watch your project light up. It might even be easier: Print the paper out, paste it on a piece of dense foam, and poke your components through the paper, maybe with a tiny dab of electrical paste/glue on each one.

    I could see kits being sold to kids in the vein of those old Radio Shack kits that had springs to attach each wire, only this would let you build something better than a primitive two bit adder. I'm thinking about "make your own laser pointer", build a programmable remote control, build your own robot control board (with attachment points for the leads to the servo motors).

    The downside is that ink-jet cartridges are not in any way standardized, and the companies are downright hostile to third parties that try to create compatible cartridges. Convincing HP or Lexmark to make expensive (well, ok, they already like expensive) low volume cartridges is a lost cause as well.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  11. Im bending my screen right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I can still see fine to ty

  12. Simple Really by mfh · · Score: 1

    Because it takes a negative charge, the screen is powered by evil and therefore is able to writhe in evil intent!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Simple Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it takes a negative charge, the screen is powered by evil and therefore is able to writhe in evil intent!

      So these monitors are Designed for Windows Vista, then?

  13. Re:Wouldn't it be neat to print out circuit boards by lurking_giant · · Score: 1

    Uhh... It's called a Laser printer dude.

    Toner is just carbon black with fusable binders in it. It's been possible to print and copy circuit boards for decades.

    You gotta move beyond the inkjet technology and spread your wings and fly.

  14. Without reading the article... by lewp · · Score: 4, Funny

    3-5 years away? Am I right?

    If only I lived 3-5 years from now...

    --
    Game... blouses.
    1. Re:Without reading the article... by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

      If only I lived 3-5 years from now...

      Hey, if you live long enough, it could happen.

    2. Re:Without reading the article... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      2004 through 2006 called. They want their lewp back ;)

  15. Re:Wouldn't it be neat to print out circuit boards by qortra · · Score: 1

    Let's go a little deeper - what we really need is bendy circuit boards so our electronics can wobble. Just imagine Gummy brand cell phones: they wriggle away from you as you talk.

  16. I wouldn't worry about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can't be more than what HP charges.

  17. Fingernails "a-la-Total Recall" by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    It's so that girls can change the color of their fingernails just by touching them, just like in Total Recall.

    http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Fingernail+color+%22Total+Recall%22&btnG=Search&meta=

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  18. Rolled up displays by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    In the movie Red Planet, they used a portable "X-ray"-like machine to see broken bones, IIRC.

    They unrolled it and held it over the person directly, and a "X-ray"-like image was displayed immediately.

    This was a great "wow" factor. Not even Star Trek comes close.

    1. Re:Rolled up displays by Starayo · · Score: 1

      Pity everyone involved in using such a thing would probably get cancer.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Rolled up displays by Facetious · · Score: 1

      Or, at the very least, find that their chocolate bars have melted in their pockets.

      --
      Let us not become the evil that we deplore.
    3. Re:Rolled up displays by FelixNZ · · Score: 1

      Is that really a half melted chocolate bar in your pocket? or are you just impressed by my flaccid flatscreen?

    4. Re:Rolled up displays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tricorder ftw. They don't need to hold out a bulky screen, they could scan you in seconds and know about every single atom in your body.

  19. Breakthrough Screens and Women by ACQ · · Score: 1

    I like my PC screens the way I like my women: bendy.

    --
    Currently theta testing the prototype "Event Horizon" server-scaled desktop box with a 50 Gigameg of Ram.
    1. Re:Breakthrough Screens and Women by Ringl · · Score: 1

      I like my PC screens the way I like my women...

      Large and in color?

    2. Re:Breakthrough Screens and Women by Richy_T · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wider than they are tall?

    3. Re:Breakthrough Screens and Women by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      You can stare at it all day and it won't go "WHAAT???".

      It has an "Off" switch.

      It will go to sleep if you don't use it for 30 minutes, WITHOUT moaning.

      Doesn't mind you staring at another one, hell, doesn't mind you having two or three of them sitting on your desk, ready and waiting, just for you. Doesn't mind the big one in the living room either.

      They both age at approximately the same speed? One gets yellow and its colours fade until the light dies. The screen just stops working.

      This joke has probably outlived itself.

  20. nine positions? by SirTicksAlot · · Score: 1

    from the 1001-positions-for-computing dept.
    Really..... Only 9 positions?

    1. Re:nine positions? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      from the 1001-positions-for-computing dept.
      Really..... Only 9 positions?

      Yeah, you have to get into the double figures before positions get interesting.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  21. Stone Tablets?! Luxury!!! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

    Why when we were young all we had to write on was unobtanium! Needless to say, not a lot ever got written down...and we were grateful!!

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    1. Re:Stone Tablets?! Luxury!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, you had it easy, we couldn't even get unobtanium. Al we had to write on was the skin of our backs. And we didn't have any ink. We had to open a vein and use our own blood. And posting, don't even talk about posting, really really painful. And if you told that to young uns today they wouldn't believe you.

  22. Camouflage by everweb · · Score: 1

    Paint the object you want to hide and point the image source (camera) at whatever is behind the object.

    1. Re:Camouflage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parallax is a bitch.

  23. Beating the camouflage by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

    take one step to the left

    --
    :x
  24. Specific eh? by idontneedanickname · · Score: 2, Funny

    This new form of N-type ink, made by dissolving a specific molecule in a certain solvent...

    Specific reporting like that is why I keep frequenting certain websites.

  25. With what speed... by larpon · · Score: 1

    does the ink breakthrough Heralds bendy PC screens? :)

  26. On an inkjet? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    We're sorry, but your display's ink cartridge has expired! Please replace with Genuine (TM) HP (TM) ink for best results.

    Then how are you reading this message you say? By violating the DMCA! Please unlock your door and put on the teakettle, the stormtroopers will arrive shortly.

  27. charge discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do they like negative charges better than positive ones (apparently available from xerox since 2004 but still no bendy screens...)?
    I vote for the positive charge because it sounds more positive!

  28. shouldn't knock either by pha3r0 · · Score: 1

    my dad is a trade printer. I remember having an itek sitting in the living room and presses in the garage as a kid. hes not the hippest of the boomers but he has kept up on printer technology because it stole a lot of his business.

    I don't know exact models he has now and its not that imnportent. Other posters have commented about there needs for only B&W or specific photo prints. My dad has a (I think cannon) his volume office copier for his in house B&W work ( he will never ever submit to instant printers for a job that is to be delivered to a customer ). He also has an inkjet for doing photo work on, and as the oldest male in our line he take a literal ton of photos stores them digitally and will gladly produce sets for anyone that wants them. I do not know what that printer is but I want to say its a smaller HP and knowing him he wouldn't splurge if time was not important, but the thing does very very nice prints and he gets some UV resistant ink in bulk somewhere online so the they actually last like a real photo.

    All that said, my hp printer here at my feet has been empty for months because I just can't justify 50 bucks for a black cartridge. If I replaced the thing and used it as I really wanted to it would cost me more then my car insurance!

  29. Does anyone really care? by Flentil · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seriously, I see articles about 'bendable displays' about once per week for the past couple years, as if people were desperate to get their hands on this technology. For what purpose really? We're never going to have moving pictures on newspapers unless you want to pay $100 or more for a paper, and that's never going to happen. What sort of mass hysteria is going on here were companies think we're all desperate for them to invent bendable displays? Does anyone really want to use one? Does anyone really have any practical use for this technology sinkhole?

  30. More importantly by MegaBitzz · · Score: 1

    The printing of circuitry would make fabrication simpler and more accessible and people may be able to print their own (super sized of course) chip designs. Besides, they already came out with a flexible screen at CES...

  31. Actually... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

    "ITS OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!11" (Sorry, couldn't resist putting such an appropriate DBZ quote)

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    1. Re:Actually... by Two9A · · Score: 1

      No, I think that was his point. It's not "OVER NINE THOUSAND", since that was never said in the Japanese.

      It's "OVER EIGHT THOUSAND".

      --
      xkcdsw: the unofficial archive of Making xkcd Slightly Worse
  32. Re:Wouldn't it be neat to print out circuit boards by jandrese · · Score: 1

    I'd offer that your average home enthusiast is more likely to own an ink-jet printer than a laser printer.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  33. Uses for bendy computer screens. by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    Imagine a screen like a crazy carpet. (Kids snow sled made from 1/16" polyethylene, 2' x 5') Stand it on edge on a desk in an circular arc.

    Imagine a screen for trade shows that can be set up like a projection screen -- and you never have to worry about casting a shadow on the screen or blinding yourself glancing at the projector.

    The lower res version becomes a large screen TV without the $200 wall hanging hardware, and disappears into a valance at the ceiling.

    Imagine high res screens with very low bandwidth that allow you to subscribe to the poster of the week club. (s/poster/artwork/)

    Imagine the possibility of having animated logos on flags.

    Imagine a laptop computer the size of whatever keyboard your fingers are in love with. The screen rolls up in to the upper edge of the keyboard, with the top inch of the screen showing above the keyboard when it's furled, so you can use it for small screen applications without unfurling.

    Imagine using them as window coverings.

    If you have a window that looks onto a factory roof or an air shaft, you can put a 'scenedow' that carries a live feed from a mountain meadow, a rocky beach.

    If they work passively (they don't emit light, but just change reflectivity) then they can be used to change the albedo of your windows. Silver in summer to reflect the heat, black in winter to absorb it.

    If they are really flexible, (E.g. like cloth) there are interesting art possibilities having animated imagery or abstract art on draped screens. Flags with animated images. Or clothing that truly makes a statement. (Imagine running X11 on your shirt. Now imagine Xroaches...

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  34. RE: Ink Breakthrough Heralds Bendy PC Screens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was told not to use caps because "it's like YELLING" Well, I WAS.

    Where Have You Been.

    We've Had A Flexable Screen That Can Be Rolled UP, FOR YEARS

  35. Re:Wouldn't it be neat to print out circuit boards by lurking_giant · · Score: 1

    Be that as it may... it's a greater likelyhood that the home enthusiast has no PCB layout program to create the board either. A used Laser printer with many home hobbiest years of life left on it costs no more than a cheep inkjet printer. Much like the folks who complain that they don't have access to a magical fabrication machine (ala Star Trek Mater replicator), they also would have no way of programming it to produce anything original. Since making a copy of an existing item would probably be a violation of someones patent or copyright.

    By the way, you can take your inkjetted PCB layout up to any Kinko's and get a conductive copy made for pennies.

  36. Re:Wouldn't it be neat to print out circuit boards by MattskEE · · Score: 1

    Making the circuit board bendy is no problem, they've got plenty of substrates for that which do it with varying degrees of flexibility, thickness, and cost.

    The hard part is that you need to follow new design rules for the things you put on the board: copper traces and components which have not been designed with flexibility in mind. The non-flexible components limit the amount you can bend the board to an extent much less than the substrate itself can flex, otherwise you crack the solder joint or the component. It is worth noting that it is very possible to get around a lot of these issue, using embedded components and extremely small components, but as usual it's all basically a matter of how much you are willing to spend and what tradeoffs you can make.

  37. hmmm... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

    Okey, back up... 1-Are we both talking about the same thing? (I was referring to an oft-repeated quote from Dragon-Ball-Z) 2-If yes, then there is a Hebrew version? Cool! Go multi-culturalism! 3-This is the first time I ever heard that The "9000" figure was disputed, thanks for enlightening me. 4-we are so off-topic, the mods are gonna kill us!

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    1. Re:hmmm... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      PS. can some teach me how to put line breaks in my comments? the rant above was supposed to be a numbered list, but now is more of a crazy disorganized drivel.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!