You know, Japan is different enough to consider cartoons not only for children. Those are never brought to the US or Europe because the common misconception there is that cartoon are only for children.
Kind of like what they're doing with comics. Comics were serious business in the 50's, nowadays all of a sudden they're only for kids or obsessive creeps or something.
1.0 just means that it's feature-complete enough to be useful, without lacking anything major, though. As well as being polished of course.
From there, the software still wouldn't be complete. People would keep working on it and the software would still get better and better from that point on, but the 1.0 at least indicates that it does everything that the official creator aimed it to be.
Illustrator and PDF are both technologies made by Adobe. They can easily decide to save extra data in the PDFs to import them back into Illustrator with no problems if they wish so.
Of course, InkScape could do similar things to the PDF, but it kind of seems like a lost effort as PDF would usually indicate final/production/release version.
It's mostly only developers and people willing to test that use developer/nightly builds of browsers, though. The corporate customers are mostly stuck with IE6, anyway.
Still, the users are more at fault than the site itself, since they are the ones making the torrents (and linked content) available to others. It's like how YouTube gets sued over copyrighted videos when the users are at fault.
The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows. Dwarves is bad grammar, but is in common enough usage that it's pointless to argue. "Dwarfs" just makes you look illiterate, as if you spelled the plural of fish as "fishs."
Or fishes, for that matter. The plural for fish is, after all, fish.
One thing that was never adequately explained to me is why can life only be very similar to us?
Because very specific circumstances are required in order for a life form to exist, and the only type of livable circumstances we've been able to compare to are our own.
There is no software that wraps all of it around one nice, understandable UI though. Some (especially less technical) project members don't want to dawdle in the terminal when they don't have to.
Fat chance. They'll probably somehow break compatibility with non-Windows systems with a next upgrade somehow. Hey, open-source only defines the source must stay available, not that it HAS to run on several different systems, right?
After which interested parties can then try to fix the thing again to work under Linux too. If a fork is possible with the license, I see a fork coming.
If there are two very different ways to do something, and there are groups of people who prefer one over the other, having this kind of fragmentation becomes sort of unavoidable.
Slashdot Mirror
So, you caught it? You have a nasty cough there...
On a related note, getting ill also strengthens the immune system. If you don't die, that is.
This isn't news.
Maybe Wikipedia is getting complete enough for people to run out of things to write...
You know, Japan is different enough to consider cartoons not only for children. Those are never brought to the US or Europe because the common misconception there is that cartoon are only for children.
Kind of like what they're doing with comics. Comics were serious business in the 50's, nowadays all of a sudden they're only for kids or obsessive creeps or something.
1.0 just means that it's feature-complete enough to be useful, without lacking anything major, though. As well as being polished of course.
From there, the software still wouldn't be complete. People would keep working on it and the software would still get better and better from that point on, but the 1.0 at least indicates that it does everything that the official creator aimed it to be.
If you go Xubuntu you get a very slick blue and black theme though.
Illustrator and PDF are both technologies made by Adobe. They can easily decide to save extra data in the PDFs to import them back into Illustrator with no problems if they wish so.
Of course, InkScape could do similar things to the PDF, but it kind of seems like a lost effort as PDF would usually indicate final/production/release version.
It's mostly only developers and people willing to test that use developer/nightly builds of browsers, though. The corporate customers are mostly stuck with IE6, anyway.
Become a president first, then we'll talk.
Still, the users are more at fault than the site itself, since they are the ones making the torrents (and linked content) available to others. It's like how YouTube gets sued over copyrighted videos when the users are at fault.
Finally I got that episode of, uh, FIRENDZ in!
The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows. Dwarves is bad grammar, but is in common enough usage that it's pointless to argue. "Dwarfs" just makes you look illiterate, as if you spelled the plural of fish as "fishs."
Or fishes, for that matter. The plural for fish is, after all, fish.
Unless you're mafia I guess.
One thing that was never adequately explained to me is why can life only be very similar to us?
Because very specific circumstances are required in order for a life form to exist, and the only type of livable circumstances we've been able to compare to are our own.
This means more girls to choose from, guys! Too bad it only affects the following generations (unless you're into those wrong things).
Haha only on /. would someone compare Apple to communist Russia and be corrected 'Its worse than that, you could even call it DRM'.
I'm surprised nobody's compared them with Hitler yet...
You're right. I'm a nobody, and I care.
Before Duke Nukem Forever?
The difference is that this language is written specially to be used in the domain of video hardware.
There is no software that wraps all of it around one nice, understandable UI though. Some (especially less technical) project members don't want to dawdle in the terminal when they don't have to.
Microsoft can withdraw approval for Mono at any time, if they wish.
They made some sort of legal declaration (or however you call it) a few months ago that would make this illegal...
Hmm, Linux has succeeded on both my and my mom's computers... And she's not exactly tech-savvy.
Fat chance. They'll probably somehow break compatibility with non-Windows systems with a next upgrade somehow. Hey, open-source only defines the source must stay available, not that it HAS to run on several different systems, right?
After which interested parties can then try to fix the thing again to work under Linux too. If a fork is possible with the license, I see a fork coming.
Name's taken already.
I think they should call it "togo". Because it's a language "to go" and because it sounds sproingy (like "pogo").
What's Google implying? That I Go ogle people?
If there are two very different ways to do something, and there are groups of people who prefer one over the other, having this kind of fragmentation becomes sort of unavoidable.