Current laws don't differentiate between the former and the later. Oh, and... I'd call denying sex deprived teens drugs much heavier child abuse. (Speaking as one. Before I get the usual rhetoric, I'm not ugly, nor smelly, nor shy. Everybody just want to be 'just friends'. I'm sick of it...)
1.I agree. 2.Because the would screw performance. Write barriers were used only on appropriate hardware (though if you have access to the MMU, anything will do, with some hacks). 3.There is still performance degradation for dynamic type checks.
Re:"Alice" one of the best learning languages toda
on
Land of Lisp
·
· Score: 1
Viper mode disagrees with you.
Re:metaprogramming FTW!
on
Land of Lisp
·
· Score: 1
Balkanization?
Re:metaprogramming FTW!
on
Land of Lisp
·
· Score: 1
Parent is right, marketing gotta take the heat too.
Except for keeping the dataflow with the control flow (the cpu has a hard time tracking values for superscalar operation as is, jmp instructions with no information on dataflow, like a conditional swap, makes it hell), and write barriers for the GC, and a assembly level typing system (the language is too dynamic to be statically checked).
Slashdot Mirror
You were going to acquaint me with your daughter?
Doesn't it take a long time for the food to arrive from Vega?
Current laws don't differentiate between the former and the later. Oh, and... I'd call denying sex deprived teens drugs much heavier child abuse. (Speaking as one. Before I get the usual rhetoric, I'm not ugly, nor smelly, nor shy. Everybody just want to be 'just friends'. I'm sick of it...)
Mozilla: *lock* *load* *points AK-47 with grenade launcher* Yeah?
You support statutory rape laws? Turn in your geek card. Now.
Yes?
Ever got your e-mail slashdoted, bub?
^W^Waddiction.
FTFY.
Redhead and brunette, anyone?
That is discrimination and slander - I never thought I'd say this, but - someone sue Google!
I'd call it a tie. Shapeless 'gonzo' tits look like some sort of cancer.
How the hell does a dance move get you arrested?
Or st up wayland as an X compositing manager? Via RPC?
X client side compressing proxy server.
And we can name it... hmmm... X11?
Why would insulation degrade efficiency?
Did those Azure patches get in mainline? I think Red Hat would have an interest in that.
1.I agree.
2.Because the would screw performance. Write barriers were used only on appropriate hardware (though if you have access to the MMU, anything will do, with some hacks).
3.There is still performance degradation for dynamic type checks.
Viper mode disagrees with you.
Balkanization?
Parent is right, marketing gotta take the heat too.
Except for keeping the dataflow with the control flow (the cpu has a hard time tracking values for superscalar operation as is, jmp instructions with no information on dataflow, like a conditional swap, makes it hell), and write barriers for the GC, and a assembly level typing system (the language is too dynamic to be statically checked).
You got it exactly backwards, IIRC.
Make it electric and sporty (not that much more expensive), throw in removable second and third seat rows, and I'm in.
Runic letter thorn. No need for x.