Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker.
Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker.
Where the fuck do you think that quote comes from genius?
Also, where's the link to your evidence? Because we both know the second you post your link, we'll see it's MY link, and then we'll scroll down to where they qualify what you are posting.
You're wrong and you know it, but now you're not a dick, you're just pathetic.
Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker."
ANd guess what twat, your link doesn't say anything about software.
Jesus, you looked stupid before, now you're aguing with a link that is as clear and unambiguous as possible, that anyone can check themselves by clicking.
Which, you, not too unusually, didn't bother to provide for your "evidence".
Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker
Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker
Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker
Eat me.
PS mods, I have no problem being modded dwon for telling this idiot to fuck off.
PPS Hey idiot, now that you're irrefutably proven wrong, fuck off
Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker.)
If that's not good enough, do a search, I hear google works great. I;d help more, but at least two fucking idiots decided that they were too stupid and lazy to bother with checking the facts, and modded me down for telling you all that yes you can return opened software.
To quote Swift
"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him".
Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker.
How dare you assholes mod that down when there wasn't even anything remotely realted to a troll.
It's a good thing you're not totally obsessed with replying, otherwise you might do so in nine minutes then continuously reply to say you're not obsessed.
"Ohhhh, you mean the click-through "contract" that is only available for viewing AFTER the game is purchased and rendered non-returnable"
Two problems guy, the game is not "rendered non-returnable" as it can be returned, depending on where you purchased it.
Second, what does the store's return policy have to do with the EULA? If you're pissed you bought a game from a place that won't let you return it, look in the mirror, or bitch about the stores.
"So, care to explain to me what I should do the next time I do not agree to an EULA? "
Yes, stop pretending there aren't places that let you return used games and buy it there.
Whether it's physically painful for you to sit there fidgeting until it's been long enough for you to post without looking like even more of a loser.
Don't bother waiting, you can't make it any worse.
Spun says "I dun'ts gives a fudgy what you think, and I'll post over and over, obsessively and without fail to prove I's dun'ts care!!!!one1111eleven!!!"
SO in respomse to your question of "what does that make you?"
I'll give you this
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."- Jonathan Swift
Stop deluding yourself into thinking that when you find a gaggle of idiots to agreew with you that somehow their agreement means anything about the value of your opinion.
"No, that would be an abuse of power. Same thing here"
No actually, it isn't and it takes an especially obtuse person to think otherwise.
In your analogy (and just so we're clear, analogies are stupid) the IRS man does not have his ability to do his job significantly impacted, nor does the climate of his office change in a way that merits consideration.
In the real life story that actually matters and isn't a weak ass wrong analogy, the principal very much does have his ability to do his job as an overseer of children impacted. The crime was directly related to his responsibilities. In addition, the climate of the school is disrupted far more than the office of your faux IRS agent.
In short, they're not the same. They're not even close to the same, and arguing otherwise in light of the obvious dissimilarities is disingenuous at best, and a downright deception at worst.
Slashdot Mirror
So you're crediblity is called into question, therefore making it relevant to ALL of your posts.
And again, because you seem to have trouble with literacy
http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespolicies.html
Yes they do
http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespolicies.html [apple.com]
Where the fuck do you think that quote comes from genius?
Also, where's the link to your evidence? Because we both know the second you post your link, we'll see it's MY link, and then we'll scroll down to where they qualify what you are posting.
You're wrong and you know it, but now you're not a dick, you're just pathetic.
Um, it's in the link loser. The one you read, but are now claiming "doesn't prove anything"
Here it is again, but do you realize how stupid you look arguing with Apple's official return policy
http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespolicies.html
Note that you may return software after rejecting the licensing terms, provided the software is not installed on a computer. However, if your software includes a license that you can read before you break the seal or sticker on the software media packaging, you may not return the software once you break the software media packaging seal or sticker."
ANd guess what twat, your link doesn't say anything about software.
Jesus, you looked stupid before, now you're aguing with a link that is as clear and unambiguous as possible, that anyone can check themselves by clicking.
Which, you, not too unusually, didn't bother to provide for your "evidence".
God, how much of a loser are you?
Seven minutes!
You obviously obeyed when I instructed you to avoid waiting, it's nice to know you do what I tell you when I tell you.
But it doesn't stop us from laughing at you.
You were wrong, Apple lets you return opened software, and I distinctly recall you saying
"Wow, that's fucking bullshit. There's NOWHERE you can purchase a PC GAME from and RETURN it. Where are you from, the 1990s?
No stop being a moronic asshole just to "win" your pointless argument."
I notice that vociferousness is conspicuously absent in your "mea culpa".
Now that I think about it, your entire "mea culpa" is absent, and you're STILL lying about not being able to retun software after it is opened.
http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespolicies.html
What kind of coward does that?
Oh, you do...
As I have already told you, you will at the Apple store.
Of course, you also were a total prick, so even irrefutable proof doesn't do it for you, you have to continue insisting you're right.
http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespolicies.html [apple.com] [apple.com]
But you aren't.
Because Apple does.
You fail.
"No stop being a moronic asshole just to "win" your pointless argument."
I can only imagine hgow stupid you must feel after saying that while I post this
http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespolicies.html [apple.com]
Eat me.
PS mods, I have no problem being modded dwon for telling this idiot to fuck off.
PPS Hey idiot, now that you're irrefutably proven wrong, fuck off
Nice to see not all the mods fire off "troll" just because they're ignorant. Thank you.
I bet if we were discussing your sex life, nine minutes would be your personal best.
But we're not, and you're a loser.
A loser that we're laughing at.
Since when it is a troll to expect people to actually research what they're buying instead of bitching about it a suing later?
And before you bust out your "he's right, but I'll mod him down anyway stick" that's exactly what this story is about.
How stupid do you look modding someone troll for telling the truth...
http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespolicies.html
Apple does.
If that's not good enough, do a search, I hear google works great. I;d help more, but at least two fucking idiots decided that they were too stupid and lazy to bother with checking the facts, and modded me down for telling you all that yes you can return opened software.
To quote Swift
"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him".
PS fuck you mods.
There was no troll there
and Apple let's you return opened software for a refund
http://store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/salespolicies.html
How dare you assholes mod that down when there wasn't even anything remotely realted to a troll.
You're wrong mods, eat it.
God forbid you research a product before buying, it's far better to buy it thoughtlessly, then bitch about it and sue later.
And you have yet to explain why the game being "non refundable" is anyones fault but yours for buying it from a place with such a return policy.
It's a good thing you're not totally obsessed with replying, otherwise you might do so in nine minutes then continuously reply to say you're not obsessed.
Uh oh... never mind...
"Ohhhh, you mean the click-through "contract" that is only available for viewing AFTER the game is purchased and rendered non-returnable"
Two problems guy, the game is not "rendered non-returnable" as it can be returned, depending on where you purchased it.
Second, what does the store's return policy have to do with the EULA? If you're pissed you bought a game from a place that won't let you return it, look in the mirror, or bitch about the stores.
"So, care to explain to me what I should do the next time I do not agree to an EULA? "
Yes, stop pretending there aren't places that let you return used games and buy it there.
"You're funny."
I know.
"But if you really want to believe I've been logging out to troll you AC, go right ahead. That just makes it funnier."
Well, you lying about it makes it "funnier" still.
And what's even "funnier" is that you obsessively denying it.
Whether it's physically painful for you to sit there fidgeting until it's been long enough for you to post without looking like even more of a loser.
Don't bother waiting, you can't make it any worse.
Spun says "I dun'ts gives a fudgy what you think, and I'll post over and over, obsessively and without fail to prove I's dun'ts care!!!!one1111eleven!!!"
Yes, again, Spun is that stupid.
Spun says "I know I reply in nine minutes, which of course means you're obsessed with me."
Yes, Spun is that stupid.
Which is why we laugh at him so much.
"This reminds me why I have a -6 modifier on new users."
Why, because you're a pompous dick?
"LOL, that wasn't me."
Yes it was.
"And really, I'm just trolling"
FYP.
"No reason to get all butt hurt."
Good thing I didn't, but instead called you out for the ridiculous typo-trolling-twat you are (yay for alliteration).
Now go log out and troll me AC again.
Matters?
SO in respomse to your question of "what does that make you?"
I'll give you this
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."- Jonathan Swift
Stop deluding yourself into thinking that when you find a gaggle of idiots to agreew with you that somehow their agreement means anything about the value of your opinion.
"I mean a *good* reason"
He meant a good reason.
"No, that would be an abuse of power. Same thing here"
No actually, it isn't and it takes an especially obtuse person to think otherwise.
In your analogy (and just so we're clear, analogies are stupid) the IRS man does not have his ability to do his job significantly impacted, nor does the climate of his office change in a way that merits consideration.
In the real life story that actually matters and isn't a weak ass wrong analogy, the principal very much does have his ability to do his job as an overseer of children impacted. The crime was directly related to his responsibilities. In addition, the climate of the school is disrupted far more than the office of your faux IRS agent.
In short, they're not the same. They're not even close to the same, and arguing otherwise in light of the obvious dissimilarities is disingenuous at best, and a downright deception at worst.
Spun said "Duh, I's not obsessed, I has to reply in nine minutes, I has no choice, I swear I's not obsessed!"
That made it even more fun to laugh at you.