No, let's not do anything that might have the slightest potential for problems. We can go back to living in caves where the worst that can happen is being ripped to bits by a tiger.
Yes, competition is dreadful for business. There should be a single, government regulated broadband provider charging exhorbitant fees for poor bandwidth and no choice.
IHBT.
That is not a catch-22. There's no inherent paradox because there's no incentive to give a bad review (unless journalistic integrity counts, but these game web sites aren't run by journalists anyway.)
Look up "public lending right".
The payment is typically made statistically; not on a literal per-book-borrowed basis
E.g. an explanation of Britain's PLR is at http://www.plr.uk.com/aboutus/aboutus.htm
Now I just wish someone would find a thylacine.
We need to find two; you see, when a mummy thylacine and a daddy thylacine love each other very much.....
They change the way the information is displayed (by adding a squiggle under words with a smart tag); they don't modify the information.
The creator of an HTML page can't have a reasonable expectation about how the page is displayed - the enduser could be using Lynx or a cellphone or a braille device.
It is altering the data stream between the server and client by adding or removing metatags.
If my ISP had a web proxy, for example, which did this then I would switch ISPs; I want to receive the data that the server sent me and decide for myself whether to use smarttags if the page supports it (the author hasn't disabled them).
With smarttags at least it is the user of the data that is altering it (although MS has the control over the changes made). Having a third party (proxy) alter the data enroute will upset both the content providers and the end users.
Slashdot Mirror
First File!
/dev/goatse.cx
The editorial stories are decided on by committee and are deliberately unsigned.
See http://washpost.com/news_ed/editorial/ for their description.
There's Satellite
No, let's not do anything that might have the slightest potential for problems. We can go back to living in caves where the worst that can happen is being ripped to bits by a tiger.
Yes, competition is dreadful for business. There should be a single, government regulated broadband provider charging exhorbitant fees for poor bandwidth and no choice.
IHBT.
Yeah, thank god it is foolproof
Obviously site specific, but only 18% of people use a browser that admits to being non-IE for google
"Whoo - first real post"
or
"Whoo - first reply to first post"
By definition : one.
And modern cards can't do blur, depth of field, etc. etc.???
You only need 24fps for the cinema. Knocks a year or so off your estimate.
put quotes around the phrase.
That is not a catch-22. There's no inherent paradox because there's no incentive to give a bad review (unless journalistic integrity counts, but these game web sites aren't run by journalists anyway.)
Dear jedwards, Look at this amazing
which renders checksumming the whole message a bit useless.
Look up "public lending right". The payment is typically made statistically; not on a literal per-book-borrowed basis
E.g. an explanation of Britain's PLR is at http://www.plr.uk.com/aboutus/aboutus.htm
If they wait then it is too late. The whole point of beta programs is to identify problems.
They don't need to come over. http://fridge.kitchen.sparcv9.home
Now I just wish someone would find a thylacine. .....
We need to find two; you see, when a mummy thylacine and a daddy thylacine love each other very much
No it isn't.
They change the way the information is displayed (by adding a squiggle under words with a smart tag); they don't modify the information.
The creator of an HTML page can't have a reasonable expectation about how the page is displayed - the enduser could be using Lynx or a cellphone or a braille device.
"It completely destroys the aluminium"
2 E=MC and all that.
Probably : http://www.ozforces.com/showthread.php?s=b50e0ee85 7c1967c4232f31f03f60b4a&threadid=11766&highlight=m aniac+and+demo+and+cheat
Graham Chapman got a permanent position pushing up the daisies :-(
It is altering the data stream between the server and client by adding or removing metatags.
If my ISP had a web proxy, for example, which did this then I would switch ISPs; I want to receive the data that the server sent me and decide for myself whether to use smarttags if the page supports it (the author hasn't disabled them).
With smarttags at least it is the user of the data that is altering it (although MS has the control over the changes made). Having a third party (proxy) alter the data enroute will upset both the content providers and the end users.