y fair, he doesn't mean money, he means impact to the persons actual life. A millionaire is still likely to eat, cloths and get around with a 10% sales tax. The lower the income the more it restricts the person.
Frankly, the first thing I would like to see done is removal of dedication from donations/tithing. Then I want the tax on the wealthiest to go back to 1999 rates. Then I want a.5% tax on all 'wall street' trades trades. Then I want interest deductions removed.
Than I want a blessings of unicorns for my daughter.
Tax work best when the tax happens when the money moves. The only time money has value is at the moment it changes hands. Everything else it point scoring and project potential.
This, again? It' been complete destroyed. There are many reason why.
Assuming your goal is ACTUALLY to maintain tiered class system with ways to move between the classes. If you want 2 classes, Workers and the wealthy, then go right ahead, it would work extremely well.
Are system can be adjusted, loopholes can be removed. Over all it's a good system, just get involved to make change happen.
" The sole purpose of all of our tax mess is to obfuscate the real percentage we're all paying in taxes. false.
"The country or state doesn't have jurisdiction to tax the transaction." Actually they don't tax the company, the tax is paid by the individual, so the individual is required to pay. Of course, people are cheap whiny short sighted bastards, so they don't pay their share if they can save some pennies.
And there is not reason a country can't create a treaty with other countries in that the country of origin collects taxes and then send it to the country.
There is no actual genuine research anymore becasue it's all been done. There are no ghosts. Every aspect has been explained using a process known as science. Look into it.
Yeah, you kids should live in thee exact same culture I did and never change. Plus, I'll chastise you with my meaningless rant for you daring to have a different culture.
Listen up dirt bag: You foisted Paul Hogan on us, so now you get this Gaelic holiday. Suck it, mate.
And your post fails to mention the underlying question: Why do people who clearly don't understand US finance, the debt, and think we are going bankrupt continue to open there mouth and look like fools. I guess we will never know~
You should actually spend some time learning those subjects instead of let the media tell you what to think.
whoa, back off. The 'people' who got us into this mess didn't know better, couldn't no better, had no other examples to lead with, and used the cheapest easiest source of energy. That lead to the building and advancement to the point where other countries can skip it. I have no blame for the people who started it, and a lot of general praise for them. If you are looking to take it out on someone,look to the people who refused to take action in the last 30 years.
Start with Reagan. We would have an additional 20 years of scientific gains of that asshat hadn't actively tried to shut down solar.
" No weapons-grade fissible material " no correct. The process is harder and require some pretty specific equipment, but you can get weapons grade material from a thorium plant.
Solar doesn't need vast wealth, or a lot of education. It doesn't need to be rolled out for gigawatt demand, so you can do one village at a time, and wiring and maintenance is simple enough that it can be taught in a couple of weeks. With the added bonus that it will create a need for trades people on a per village basis.
Stop thinking in centralized creation for millions of people. The problem with solar in the US is that it's not good enough to give us the amount of energy we use in a centralized fashion.
In a non-industrialized society, It gives them more then the currently use, so for them its a gain.
"Just pay triple on your electric bill. " You can't triple something you don't have. Also, they are generally bought on a village bases. I will ignore they obvious in that it won't be triple.
Just because they are going to do it differently, doesn't mean it's wrong.
You should learn t think objectively and critically.
NO, it means they will use other technology to develop their production structure, one not dependent on oil. There is NO rule that says a country needs to follow the same path as others. There is no reason they can't go straight to Nuclear, wind, and solar to build an infrastructure.
I have done robotic software engineering where is something goes wrong, people loose limbs and possible die. I take engineering really fucking serious.
You ask point about engineering, but why slam liberal arts majors? You sound like a self centered ass without the ability to consider other people and motives; which makes for a horrible engineer.
y fair, he doesn't mean money, he means impact to the persons actual life.
A millionaire is still likely to eat, cloths and get around with a 10% sales tax. The lower the income the more it restricts the person.
Frankly, the first thing I would like to see done is removal of dedication from donations/tithing. .5% tax on all 'wall street' trades trades.
Then I want the tax on the wealthiest to go back to 1999 rates.
Then I want a
Then I want interest deductions removed.
Than I want a blessings of unicorns for my daughter.
Tax work best when the tax happens when the money moves.
The only time money has value is at the moment it changes hands.
Everything else it point scoring and project potential.
This, again?
It' been complete destroyed. There are many reason why.
Assuming your goal is ACTUALLY to maintain tiered class system with ways to move between the classes.
If you want 2 classes, Workers and the wealthy, then go right ahead, it would work extremely well.
Are system can be adjusted, loopholes can be removed. Over all it's a good system, just get involved to make change happen.
" The sole purpose of all of our tax mess is to obfuscate the real percentage we're all paying in taxes.
false.
"The country or state doesn't have jurisdiction to tax the transaction."
Actually they don't tax the company, the tax is paid by the individual, so the individual is required to pay.
Of course, people are cheap whiny short sighted bastards, so they don't pay their share if they can save some pennies.
And there is not reason a country can't create a treaty with other countries in that the country of origin collects taxes and then send it to the country.
Just because you don't understand how somehting works, or it's the way it is doesn't make it brain damaged.
Why? as a civilized country the process is dealing with these issues.
But hey, lets go break some windows, that will change everything~
There is no actual genuine research anymore becasue it's all been done.
There are no ghosts.
Every aspect has been explained using a process known as science.
Look into it.
Guy Fawkes wanted to install an even more strict theocracy.
Which is why whenever I see anonymous they look like fucking idiots.
Yeah, you kids should live in thee exact same culture I did and never change. Plus, I'll chastise you with my meaningless rant for you daring to have a different culture.
Listen up dirt bag:
You foisted Paul Hogan on us, so now you get this Gaelic holiday. Suck it, mate.
No and Yes.
Hint: You are safer sending them around to the neighbors house, or a stranger house, then you are leaving them you your own relatives.
Of course number exist, their just not natural.
Exactly. That is the type of person they are looking for, as opposed to someone with a strong interest in mathematics so they study it.
There will be no singularity.
And of course we can shut down or slow down AI development.
Oh no, it's building an AI we don't understand!
Stand back, I can handle it!
Thanks fdisk man!
Actually, his specific issue with it may still be correct. There is no consensus the determinism has been refuted.
We don't know enough yet.
Huh, you must not be a very good one, since it's apparent you can't actually think about things, or understand the article.
Sampling a small group for something is typical of how these things are done. If that's looks like it is what you expect, expand the study.
Plus they have a random sampling of genome to use for comparison.
Stick to 4th grade math or whatever the hell it is you pretend to do.
IF the prejudice is that people favor smart kids, want smart kids, and strive to prove that with education, I can live with that.
soldiering.
And your post fails to mention the underlying question: Why do people who clearly don't understand US finance, the debt, and think we are going bankrupt continue to open there mouth and look like fools.
I guess we will never know~
You should actually spend some time learning those subjects instead of let the media tell you what to think.
whoa, back off.
The 'people' who got us into this mess didn't know better, couldn't no better, had no other examples to lead with, and used the cheapest easiest source of energy. That lead to the building and advancement to the point where other countries can skip it.
I have no blame for the people who started it, and a lot of general praise for them.
If you are looking to take it out on someone,look to the people who refused to take action in the last 30 years.
Start with Reagan. We would have an additional 20 years of scientific gains of that asshat hadn't actively tried to shut down solar.
" No weapons-grade fissible material "
no correct. The process is harder and require some pretty specific equipment, but you can get weapons grade material from a thorium plant.
Solar doesn't need vast wealth, or a lot of education.
It doesn't need to be rolled out for gigawatt demand, so you can do one village at a time, and wiring and maintenance is simple enough that it can be taught in a couple of weeks.
With the added bonus that it will create a need for trades people on a per village basis.
Stop thinking in centralized creation for millions of people. The problem with solar in the US is that it's not good enough to give us the amount of energy we use in a centralized fashion.
In a non-industrialized society, It gives them more then the currently use, so for them its a gain.
"Just pay triple on your electric bill. "
You can't triple something you don't have.
Also, they are generally bought on a village bases.
I will ignore they obvious in that it won't be triple.
Just because they are going to do it differently, doesn't mean it's wrong.
You should learn t think objectively and critically.
NO, it means they will use other technology to develop their production structure, one not dependent on oil.
There is NO rule that says a country needs to follow the same path as others. There is no reason they can't go straight to Nuclear, wind, and solar to build an infrastructure.
I have done robotic software engineering where is something goes wrong, people loose limbs and possible die.
I take engineering really fucking serious.
You ask point about engineering, but why slam liberal arts majors?
You sound like a self centered ass without the ability to consider other people and motives; which makes for a horrible engineer.