There a re a bunch of ways to determine that. About 1% of the people might be subtle enough to get around it. OTOH if you are the subtle then it probably doesn't involve you.
Actualy, it does. It will mostly involve 2 parties. As such, knowing where the photos came from will be trivial. SO legal recourse, which is what this is about, is far simpler here then a bittorrent that could have come from on of 1000 machines.
Slashdot Mirror
And? Why do we have a routine business sales article instead of an article on hyper-local weather forecasting?
and it's not prediction, it's forecasting.
Or and hacked word doc, or an image with an exploit, or a file with a virus.
It's like your knowledge of attack vectors stopped in 1994
anon sneakernet is still sneakernet
Time, risk, and value.
The scientists? probably very little.Public perception of the science? a lot.
They even linked to the study.
like making decision based on scientific research. wait, what?
It has nothing to do with dissident speech. It has nothing to do with squelching actual scientific discussion.
Read the damn study.
There is no such thing as dissident speech in science. Ignorant, fallacious, and incorrect speech is another thing.
The mean factually incorrect things could still be modded up.
Read the study on why that turns out to be bad.
read the article and the scientific study.
People posting factual incorrect stuff and sway an opinion.
Thank about that for a minute.
you're boring. You're life is boring. I'm was nearly bored to death reading you post letting me know how boring you are.
There a re a bunch of ways to determine that.
About 1% of the people might be subtle enough to get around it. OTOH if you are the subtle then it probably doesn't involve you.
False, like most thing posted about intellectual property on /.
You can't pass a law for a crime people don't know will exist.
Post it to a revenge site, send it to a parent, or a boss. have text saying 'this will show them' and so on.
It's not that hard to figure out, grow a brain.
well if you don't do it, then clearly it's 'stupid'.
becasue one is a civil law, the other is not.
You can replace girls with people.
not likely. My son and his friend love the HL series., as does my daughter. Most of them weren't born yet.
It's a good series, and HL2 stand the test of time...so far.
Could you condense your point a little more?
But the question is can it, not will it.
Yes it can, I have no idea if it will.
All you need right now is an HDMI cable and a controller for your pc.
So if any of them are sick of not having a controller* it's there own fault.
*Which is less responsive then a keyboard,
keyboard and mouse allows for tighter corners and quicker turning.
It's one the the major PitAs in having consoles and PCs play together.
Do we really need to ask this with every new console?
Actualy, it does.
It will mostly involve 2 parties. As such, knowing where the photos came from will be trivial.
SO legal recourse, which is what this is about, is far simpler here then a bittorrent that could have come from on of 1000 machines.
Every Major OS has the capability.