Non of which work when someone is peer reviewing a study, and information that comes out later.
You might want to look up how sciences works. After which you can explain to me how someone reading a paper wouldn't report plagiarism simply becasue some woman they have never met has there name on the paper.
And you understanding of evolution, man, and women is extremely flawed.
No they don't. bal -bals fatal-fatals banal-banals. I'm sure there are other exceptions as well. Speaking of others "There have been others, to be sure. There are always others, are there not? " - Lo Pan "There have been udders, to be sure. There are always udders, are there not? " - Cow Pan
This type of thing existed far before the western world existed. 'I want what you have, and I want to take control of it' is as old as life. Literally as old as life.
So stop with your 'western civilization' bullshit.
"* 4. Why the fuck don't we test GMO crops for 20+ years before we start feeding them to people, and esp. children?" becasue that's a stupidly long time.
If you think that should be the case, then you should be advocating that all food b tested becasue there is bacteria in the soil that does gene swapping between plants and animals.
If we did that, mos people would die, but hey, whats a few billion death in the name of too much safety?
" First off, there is no table of contents in a cell that tells you what genes are present." no, but there is a database that already lists what in in. In fact, this who article this is based on came about NOT from discovering it in a lab, but by looking at the database of whats in it and then creating a scare article.
So, no it didn't slip under any radar, and was tested several times in the US in 04-05.
"Not a virologist," Don't let that stop you from a length posted that's under scores your massive ignorance on the subject.
You not only don't know shit about virus, you also don't know shit about genetics, ingestion, correct scientific analyses, testing, don't know what gold standard means or what a placebo effect is.
Are you a monkey just pounding out random scientific phrases that seem correct?
I here you have to stake them through the heart, stuff their mouthy with holy wafers, and then shoot the with three silver bullets....maybe that's the yeti.
So all change is bad and you wont to live in 1935, got it.
Yuo example in no way applies to the conversation.
Cane toads tests after introduction. Cane toads were shown not to work, and introduced anyways. The science was, at best, primitive by today's standards.
In all ways its a completely different scenario. But don't let thinking stop you from your FUD and stupidity.
I wish this 'Scientist don't test GMO' nonsense would stop. Seriously, you look like an idiot.
Do you know what isn't tested? non GMO food; even though there is bacteria in the soil which does gene swapping between animals and plants. OMG it all going to END!!!
Maybe it's becasue american Scientists aren't alarmists? Eating it won't suddenly make your cells express it; which is where the danger is. We have a pretty good idea how the stomach works.
Regarding GM food, Europeans have been lied to about it for decades. Certain Alarmist group in Europe wield their ignorance and stupidity with great influential power. Just like a different set of group do here in the US.
I look forward to having a flaming battery fall through my roof. Seriously, it wold be an engineering nightmare, and huge disaster on the ground, and cost millions in lawsuits.
um, you might want to reread that: "the flyover was to demonstrate that the aircraft’s computer systems would ensure lift would always be available regardless of how the pilots handle the controls." So, it seems to me it failed.
Why is a pilot making claims that are shown to be factually wrong a conspiracy? Sounds like he is just grasping at straws.
ANd? that number is pretty meaningless for a comparison. I wish people wou stop using it alone.
Far more people are on the road, and far more miles are driven then flown.
How many people die per 100,000 trips would be better. A trip in this context meaning, driving you car some where, not just vacation trips. we have, what at least 250,000,000 million people taking at least 2 trips a day? trip to work/school/ trip home. Adding in shopping, visits to event and friend houses, probably closer to 500,0000,000 trips per day.
on average there are about 30,000 flight per day.
Taken into context, car travel is far, far more safer.
Commercial airlines travel what, about 800,000,000 miles per year? Miles driven 3,000,000,000,000 More mile are driven every day then are flown all year.
a) It's not overblown. A new cutting edge airplane has parts catching fire. Among with issues. b) A380 was never totally grounded c) Stop linking to crazy sights.
Slashdot Mirror
Non of which work when someone is peer reviewing a study, and information that comes out later.
You might want to look up how sciences works.
After which you can explain to me how someone reading a paper wouldn't report plagiarism simply becasue some woman they have never met has there name on the paper.
And you understanding of evolution, man, and women is extremely flawed.
The problem is that people are suing terms like 'the bottom line is' when applying it to a papers and not a consensus of agreement.
The media, once again, is trying to make scary and angry headlines our of an interesting study.
In most places, women weren't even 'people' till about 500 years ago. and is some places they still aren't.
That use of the term as a negative is older the online games.
Get over yourself.
No they don't.
bal -bals
fatal-fatals
banal-banals.
I'm sure there are other exceptions as well. Speaking of others
"There have been others, to be sure. There are always others, are there not? " - Lo Pan
"There have been udders, to be sure. There are always udders, are there not? " - Cow Pan
This type of thing existed far before the western world existed. 'I want what you have, and I want to take control of it' is as old as life. Literally as old as life.
So stop with your 'western civilization' bullshit.
"* 4. Why the fuck don't we test GMO crops for 20+ years before we start feeding them to people, and esp. children?"
becasue that's a stupidly long time.
If you think that should be the case, then you should be advocating that all food b tested becasue there is bacteria in the soil that does gene swapping between plants and animals.
If we did that, mos people would die, but hey, whats a few billion death in the name of too much safety?
" First off, there is no table of contents in a cell that tells you what genes are present."
no, but there is a database that already lists what in in. In fact, this who article this is based on came about NOT from discovering it in a lab, but by looking at the database of whats in it and then creating a scare article.
So, no it didn't slip under any radar, and was tested several times in the US in 04-05.
"Not a virologist,"
Don't let that stop you from a length posted that's under scores your massive ignorance on the subject.
You not only don't know shit about virus, you also don't know shit about genetics, ingestion, correct scientific analyses, testing, don't know what gold standard means or what a placebo effect is.
Are you a monkey just pounding out random scientific phrases that seem correct?
people who dislike things on moral grounds often(as in nearly always) stop thinking about the issues in any critical way.. so, be carefull
I here you have to stake them through the heart, stuff their mouthy with holy wafers, and then shoot the with three silver bullets....maybe that's the yeti.
So all change is bad and you wont to live in 1935, got it.
Yuo example in no way applies to the conversation.
Cane toads tests after introduction.
Cane toads were shown not to work, and introduced anyways.
The science was, at best, primitive by today's standards.
In all ways its a completely different scenario. But don't let thinking stop you from your FUD and stupidity.
No 3 and 3b are not accurate.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16001857
I wish this 'Scientist don't test GMO' nonsense would stop. Seriously, you look like an idiot.
Do you know what isn't tested? non GMO food; even though there is bacteria in the soil which does gene swapping between animals and plants. OMG it all going to END!!!
NO they can't becasue the article doesn't really address them in any meaningful way.
And ti clearly overstate the Landes Bioscience article.
Maybe it's becasue american Scientists aren't alarmists? Eating it won't suddenly make your cells express it; which is where the danger is.
We have a pretty good idea how the stomach works.
Regarding GM food, Europeans have been lied to about it for decades. Certain Alarmist group in Europe wield their ignorance and stupidity with great influential power.
Just like a different set of group do here in the US.
Organic has specific meaning and criteria in the US.
"Mr Cundall insists that his eyewitness testimony is correct."
well, there is your mistake.
Eyewitness accounts, as it turns out, are very bad.
That was clearly a cover up for the secret alien invasion.
I look forward to having a flaming battery fall through my roof.
Seriously, it wold be an engineering nightmare, and huge disaster on the ground, and cost millions in lawsuits.
"Does this aircraft not have an APU?"
Yes...thank you, and come again.
um, you might want to reread that:
"the flyover was to demonstrate that the aircraft’s computer systems would ensure lift would always be available regardless of how the pilots handle the controls."
So, it seems to me it failed.
Why is a pilot making claims that are shown to be factually wrong a conspiracy? Sounds like he is just grasping at straws.
Just put a wind generator outside the plane for electricity~
ANd? that number is pretty meaningless for a comparison. I wish people wou stop using it alone.
Far more people are on the road, and far more miles are driven then flown.
How many people die per 100,000 trips would be better. A trip in this context meaning, driving you car some where, not just vacation trips.
we have, what at least 250,000,000 million people taking at least 2 trips a day? trip to work/school/ trip home.
Adding in shopping, visits to event and friend houses, probably closer to 500,0000,000 trips per day.
on average there are about 30,000 flight per day.
Taken into context, car travel is far, far more safer.
Commercial airlines travel what, about 800,000,000 miles per year?
Miles driven 3,000,000,000,000
More mile are driven every day then are flown all year.
a) It's not overblown. A new cutting edge airplane has parts catching fire. Among with issues.
b) A380 was never totally grounded
c) Stop linking to crazy sights.
1 dropped out of the air, the other one was able to land successfully.
Dropped out of the sky usually means crash.
"How long do you think we will stay in the air?"
"All the way to the crash site..."