".. have nothing to do with cannabis" they do with smoking cannabis. Just like they need to be a factor in anything you smoke. Don't dismiss cancer cause agent simply becasue it's in other things you smoke.
" including the DEA that have funded studies" Link of GTFO
" implies there is something else contained within the smoke which is minimizing or even neutralizing the cancer causing effects of these substances." Nope, it does not. That is just one thing in a large set of things it implies. From bad data, to the type of smoke, to lung reactions, to brain reactions, or reaction from any organ or system.
Becasue there is more to worry about. Creating an issue that pubs hate will create ANOTHER pathetic excuse to be obstructionists.
Pay attentionh to a president first year. They try to probe what thye want and check for repson form congress. If an issue will stop a bigger issue from going through, they set it aside.
One of the big examples from Obama is gitmo. He worked on closing it, but the pubs dug their heals in and made pathetic excuse of why a supermax prison won't hold them. Once that became an issue that the pub would stop all activity over, it was set aside. The the pubs uses it against him..the vary same ones who wouldn't let it close.
Fact of the matter, you could put most of the remaining people at gitmo in a county prison, and it would be perfectly secure.
So, yes he is listening, but pubs would use it as an 'evil liburl' reason not to vote for democrats. Same thing with Clinton.
What Obama did to was change the priority of who to go after, and frankly, that was a pretty big step and nearly amazing accomplishment he did it so well with this congress.
an anecdote is evidence that cannot be investigated using the scientific method. As such, worthless for any scientific reasoning at all. As a clue for something to look into? sometimes. Still worthless to draw a scientific conclusion from.
The plural of anecdotes is not, and never will be, data.
"Anecdotal information is the most basic way that human beings learn." yes, and using it to learn is why most people draw wrong conclusion, do shit that doesn't work, and waste lots of many, and more time then you think, cause someones death.
"This is one of those logical shortcuts" no it isn't. It's a truth.
"But people who ignore anecdotal information tend to get lost a whole lot." thus underscoring the fact that you don't know what anecdote means. Someone giving you directions is testable. You follow the directions.
"Anecdotal evidence is also the only kind" Wow... just..wow. So damn stupid. do you note know what anecdote means, or what scientific method means?
an anecdote is evidence that cannot be investigated using the scientific method. You examples with the ball, can, in fact, be scientifically investigated.
"It improved my wrist strength and gave serious and noticeable benefit to my parrying accuracy and control." how do you know that? you would need to go back in time and then do all the same things minus the gyros. You thinking is sloppy. I was an excellent fencer and never used one, clearly they don't work You see how sloppy that is?
really? ignoring the sign he posted, then knocking on someone door at 3AM becasue your crappy software popped up his address is being a man? And what other answer do you think you will get besides 'No, I don't have you phone' Do you think the thief will just hand it over?
What if a woman wants to do it, does that count as being a man?
How about: 'A civilized person goes to the house, and notes the sign then leaves?'
vigilantism is an individual or group who undertakes law enforcement without legal authority. So yes, it is vigilantism. IN a civilized society, you accuse someone of a crime, and they defend there innocence. This man was constantly approached and forced to PROVE his innocence by vigilante
Probably less want and more man power issue. and the vast amount of 'stolen phones' are lost phones. You see this same thing with wallets as well. Interesting story: in 1989 there was a string of pickpockets in Reno. So the police started keeping certain areas under surveillance. There were no pickpockets. There where people leaving the casino, literally through their wallet away and often injuring there face in some manner. Upon questioning these people, it turned out they didn't want to tell their spouse they lost all their money in the casino.
do you know how long 1.5 seconds is? And if you have never had to do that firing anything outside of training or practice, you probably couldn't do it that fast. probable 3 seconds.
however, even a 1.5 seconds, that's 1.5 seconds you aren't shooting at someone. That , what, 2-3 shots? (It's also another point of failure, albeit low.)
And why people think all criminals will do all criminal activity baffles me,. It simple isn't true.
And why isn't the mother in jail for manslaughter? Also, there aren't 'crazy people', there are people who may go crazy. You don't know before hand who is going to become unstable. So at 25 you may get a permit and buy guns, but at 35 not be stable.
No. he is saying the without a distribution channel, it becomes more difficult to acquire the weaponry capable of mass shootings. And there act of acquiring because a stopping point in the activity. Show me one mass shooting that didn't involve guns.
BTW, kiddy porn means there is a victim at it's creation. So, it's not the same thing and stop using emotion argument in different subjects. IT's stupid, moronic, and shows you can't actually pout together relevant and coherent arguments.
The 2nd amendments says we can have them to support a state militia. You might want to read it. The learn how commas work, then read it again. And then read up on writing styles of the period. Then read the federalist papers.
Until you do that, STFU. and while you are doing that, also thing upon how the word amend appears in amendment.
We are talking about guns, not cars. Do not change the subject.
A) Cars aren't guns. B) Precaution are taken to no allow cars to drive into malls and down the hall ways of schools. Or do you believe people should be able to drive around school halls ways all the want?
C) What happen when you break those numbers down comparing it to usage? Oh, then guns are FAR worse.
But you keep misdirecting, using logical fallacies, and cherry picking. I mean, if you use statistics and facts you wouldn't have an argument to support your ridiculous position.
A) Time reloading is time not shooting at kids. B) If during that time the shooter has a moment to reflect, there is a chance they will stop on their own, and likely kill themselves. C) It's more time for people to flee. D) Its an opportunity for someone to take action against the shooter.
frankly, if they had to manually cock the gun to load a round it would be even better. But a line in the constitution that was their because we couldn't afford a standing army somehow applies 200 years later when people can fire 100's of rounds in a minute.
Slashdot Mirror
"There are studies that show .."
link or GTFO.
".. have nothing to do with cannabis"
they do with smoking cannabis. Just like they need to be a factor in anything you smoke. Don't dismiss cancer cause agent simply becasue it's in other things you smoke.
" including the DEA that have funded studies"
Link of GTFO
" implies there is something else contained within the smoke which is minimizing or even neutralizing the cancer causing effects of these substances."
Nope, it does not. That is just one thing in a large set of things it implies. From bad data, to the type of smoke, to lung reactions, to brain reactions, or reaction from any organ or system.
Becasue there is more to worry about. Creating an issue that pubs hate will create ANOTHER pathetic excuse to be obstructionists.
Pay attentionh to a president first year. They try to probe what thye want and check for repson form congress. If an issue will stop a bigger issue from going through, they set it aside.
One of the big examples from Obama is gitmo. He worked on closing it, but the pubs dug their heals in and made pathetic excuse of why a supermax prison won't hold them. Once that became an issue that the pub would stop all activity over, it was set aside. The the pubs uses it against him..the vary same ones who wouldn't let it close.
Fact of the matter, you could put most of the remaining people at gitmo in a county prison, and it would be perfectly secure.
So, yes he is listening, but pubs would use it as an 'evil liburl' reason not to vote for democrats.
Same thing with Clinton.
What Obama did to was change the priority of who to go after, and frankly, that was a pretty big step and nearly amazing accomplishment he did it so well with this congress.
an anecdote is evidence that cannot be investigated using the scientific method.
As such, worthless for any scientific reasoning at all.
As a clue for something to look into? sometimes. Still worthless to draw a scientific conclusion from.
The plural of anecdotes is not, and never will be, data.
"Anecdotal information is the most basic way that human beings learn."
yes, and using it to learn is why most people draw wrong conclusion, do shit that doesn't work, and waste lots of many, and more time then you think, cause someones death.
"This is one of those logical shortcuts"
no it isn't. It's a truth.
"But people who ignore anecdotal information tend to get lost a whole lot."
thus underscoring the fact that you don't know what anecdote means.
Someone giving you directions is testable. You follow the directions.
Idiot.
"Anecdotal evidence is also the only kind"
Wow... just..wow.
So damn stupid.
do you note know what anecdote means, or what scientific method means?
an anecdote is evidence that cannot be investigated using the scientific method.
You examples with the ball, can, in fact, be scientifically investigated.
So learn or shut up.
I HATE it when Megatron does that, stupid robotic overlord.
"It improved my wrist strength and gave serious and noticeable benefit to my parrying accuracy and control."
how do you know that? you would need to go back in time and then do all the same things minus the gyros.
You thinking is sloppy. I was an excellent fencer and never used one, clearly they don't work
You see how sloppy that is?
mmmmm lamb gyro.
"you have to find what works for you. "
nope.
"you have to find what works"
yes.
Learn the difference, or spend a life time deluding yourself, and wasting money.
Hmmm, magical thinking, possible naturalistic fallacy, and has no idea of what the term 'side effect' mean.
Sign me up~
No, they won't fix carpal tunnel problems.
And asking it is helps 'wrist pain' is pretty meaningless since there are so many way to get wrist pain.
Also, acupuncture cures nothing, and homeopathy still doesn't work.
Once you are convicted of a crime, are you free to do that crime again without punishment?
I live in a colder ares so I repainted my house a darker color. Please explain to me how that is vanity.
Would it be vanity if the house just needed repainting and someone other color was cheaper?
really? ignoring the sign he posted, then knocking on someone door at 3AM becasue your crappy software popped up his address is being a man?
And what other answer do you think you will get besides 'No, I don't have you phone' Do you think the thief will just hand it over?
What if a woman wants to do it, does that count as being a man?
How about: 'A civilized person goes to the house, and notes the sign then leaves?'
vigilantism is an individual or group who undertakes law enforcement without legal authority. So yes, it is vigilantism.
IN a civilized society, you accuse someone of a crime, and they defend there innocence. This man was constantly approached and forced to PROVE his innocence by vigilante
Probably less want and more man power issue.
and the vast amount of 'stolen phones' are lost phones.
You see this same thing with wallets as well.
Interesting story: in 1989 there was a string of pickpockets in Reno. So the police started keeping certain areas under surveillance.
There were no pickpockets. There where people leaving the casino, literally through their wallet away and often injuring there face in some manner.
Upon questioning these people, it turned out they didn't want to tell their spouse they lost all their money in the casino.
"- they're practically banned already. "
No they aren't. It has more loop holes the fruit loops.
do you know how long 1.5 seconds is? And if you have never had to do that firing anything outside of training or practice, you probably couldn't do it that fast. probable 3 seconds.
however, even a 1.5 seconds, that's 1.5 seconds you aren't shooting at someone. That , what, 2-3 shots? (It's also another point of failure, albeit low.)
And why people think all criminals will do all criminal activity baffles me,. It simple isn't true.
for a while.
With time there will be fewer and fewer available. Something that has been seen many times before.
But if his mother couldn't have them, then what?
And why isn't the mother in jail for manslaughter?
Also, there aren't 'crazy people', there are people who may go crazy. You don't know before hand who is going to become unstable. So at 25 you may get a permit and buy guns, but at 35 not be stable.
no, no no. Only one quarter of the sentences counts, they whole sentence and it's context doesn't matter.
No. he is saying the without a distribution channel, it becomes more difficult to acquire the weaponry capable of mass shootings. And there act of acquiring because a stopping point in the activity. Show me one mass shooting that didn't involve guns.
BTW, kiddy porn means there is a victim at it's creation. So, it's not the same thing and stop using emotion argument in different subjects. IT's stupid, moronic, and shows you can't actually pout together relevant and coherent arguments.
The 2nd amendments says we can have them to support a state militia.
You might want to read it.
The learn how commas work, then read it again. And then read up on writing styles of the period.
Then read the federalist papers.
Until you do that, STFU.
and while you are doing that, also thing upon how the word amend appears in amendment.
We are talking about guns, not cars. Do not change the subject.
A) Cars aren't guns.
B) Precaution are taken to no allow cars to drive into malls and down the hall ways of schools.
Or do you believe people should be able to drive around school halls ways all the want?
C) What happen when you break those numbers down comparing it to usage?
Oh, then guns are FAR worse.
But you keep misdirecting, using logical fallacies, and cherry picking. I mean, if you use statistics and facts you wouldn't have an argument to support your ridiculous position.
They wouldn't, so ban all firearms.
Assault weapons bans have huge loopholes. Why do you think the NRA supports it?
How do you know?
Wait, you don't.
A) Time reloading is time not shooting at kids.
B) If during that time the shooter has a moment to reflect, there is a chance they will stop on their own, and likely kill themselves.
C) It's more time for people to flee.
D) Its an opportunity for someone to take action against the shooter.
frankly, if they had to manually cock the gun to load a round it would be even better.
But a line in the constitution that was their because we couldn't afford a standing army somehow applies 200 years later when people can fire 100's of rounds in a minute.
Bring in global warming example into a gun debate topic. Ballsy.