Using a precription drug outside it's design use runs with it certian risks.
Add to that, when more people us it, there will be statically the same,. but more actual side effect issues which will get into the news. This will inaccurately make the drug seem more dangerous then it is. This could cause people who need the drug to go without.
Now, if we assume no side effects, or say, fewer side effects then aspirin* should people take it? I can't think of why note. I use my smart phone to help me retain data. People use caffeine as as stimulant. The only risk is that it will be the expectation for everyone to take it.
Would I take it? why yes, yes I would.
*Which actually is troubling for about 4% of takers, who don't even know it.
"..via low-res audience pictures on gadget sites." That's not odd, that's some of his genius. If you let the people talk about and share your information, they are more emotionally invested. Steve Jobs wasn't a technical Genius, he was a people genius.
Now I can pay 600 bucks for a computer with an slow i5 chip. Yawn. Yeah,I can buy a large Touch. Yawn.
I"m not a hater, and while Apple does some thing that drive me up a wall, This is one of the most boring sets of announcements in over a decade. You have a smaller iPad, and slight hardware improvements!
" 100 million people would develop 40 million cancers over the course of their lifetimes. "
what does that even mean?
And what the hell is with the politics? Here is how to know Obama is doing a pretty good job: Almost all major accusations against him are factually wrong, or nonsense.
"people are less likely than ever to bother checking cnn.com vs going directly to google news. " false. Google news doesn't give you the whole story only a headline and a sentence or two.
"The only way to see the newspaper's side is if you imagine someone make a faux cnn homepage - listing only cnn articles and putting up advertising. That would seem fishy, wouldn't it?" yes, but that's not happening here, so it isn't relevant.
no Google should not pay. Google just show a headline and the first bit. The reader then clicks and goes to the website. Google is driving people to the site. If I had a business that could double your reader, you would gladly pay me.
"Anyone on the inside of the inside care to confirm or refute that?" how do you refute nonsense?
While lab shopping does happen, it's onyl good for that ONE event and doesn't hold up over times. If your thesis runs counter to C14, BUT goes along with current understanding of the field, then you have made a huge discovery. Far more important then the thesis itself.
The Hebrew word for day used in the genesis is account is “yom”, which is a definite 24-hour period. If a day is an era, why are an evening and a morning even mentioned? Adam was made on the sixth day (Genesis 1:26-31) which was supposedly thousand of years long. This was followed by the 7th day which was also thousands of years long. Following the 7th day, Adam fell into sin and was expelled from the Garden. This would make Adam Thousands of years old, but according to the Bible he was around 900.
How about: The passage is a parabole for mans fall from grace not literal in any way?
Because there isn't any other way to use renewable?
Solar furnaces, wind, hydro, nuclear, tidal. What about those? What about using wind generated energy that isn't needed at the time of generation? what about the idea that it's a scrubbers, and the petrol is a nice benefit?
[Condescending Wonka] Please, keep using nonsense and limited thinking to tell everyone why nothing will work. [/Condescending Wonka]
Mo, not pointless. we can create fuel from the air using solar or wind turbines.
Large trucks, heavy equipment, aircraft, ships aren't likely EVER to be electric. So, use this to lower CO2 levels to pre industrialized levels, and fuel as we transition into a more electric vehicle society.
Tools for the transition are important for a transition.
A) we need some CO2. B) Biking is great for very short personal transportation when the weather allows for it. C) We would need to plant 2 trillion trees to make up the the excess CO2 we spew into the air. D) Ships, Trucks and factories aren't helped by you pithy short sighted 'solutions'. E) I have never burned down a rain forest. Take it up with the respective countries F) No, the answer isn't simple. If it were simple it would be done. If everyone rode a bike for every personal thing they did, and excess of CO2 would still be spewing into the air.
you're point only makes sense with wildly inaccurate numbers and impractical situations.
If I had a 2 MW wind turbine on my property, that would be FAR MORE energy then I need, so that excess would power this CO2 scrubbing plant. However, there are very large areas of land that could be used to get energy to run these via wind, solar and Nuclear energy generation.
Slashdot Mirror
When it impacts other people.
Plus. people aren't in charge of what they do as much as people like to think.
Except you don't have to take them all. Maybe just when the single focus task is needed. Then take one.
the wrong question.
Using a precription drug outside it's design use runs with it certian risks.
Add to that, when more people us it, there will be statically the same,. but more actual side effect issues which will get into the news. This will inaccurately make the drug seem more dangerous then it is. This could cause people who need the drug to go without.
Now, if we assume no side effects, or say, fewer side effects then aspirin* should people take it? I can't think of why note. I use my smart phone to help me retain data. People use caffeine as as stimulant.
The only risk is that it will be the expectation for everyone to take it.
Would I take it? why yes, yes I would.
*Which actually is troubling for about 4% of takers, who don't even know it.
Ah, another post telling us the Apple priced to high the [product x] will fail.
You base that on what expertise, exactly?
"..via low-res audience pictures on gadget sites."
That's not odd, that's some of his genius. If you let the people talk about and share your information, they are more emotionally invested.
Steve Jobs wasn't a technical Genius, he was a people genius.
Now I can pay 600 bucks for a computer with an slow i5 chip. Yawn.
Yeah,I can buy a large Touch. Yawn.
I"m not a hater, and while Apple does some thing that drive me up a wall, This is one of the most boring sets of announcements in over a decade.
You have a smaller iPad, and slight hardware improvements!
" 100 million people would develop 40 million cancers over the course of their lifetimes. "
what does that even mean?
And what the hell is with the politics? Here is how to know Obama is doing a pretty good job: Almost all major accusations against him are factually wrong, or nonsense.
"people are less likely than ever to bother checking cnn.com vs going directly to google news. "
false. Google news doesn't give you the whole story only a headline and a sentence or two.
Have you ever been to google news?
https://news.google.com/
"The only way to see the newspaper's side is if you imagine someone make a faux cnn homepage - listing only cnn articles and putting up advertising. That would seem fishy, wouldn't it?"
yes, but that's not happening here, so it isn't relevant.
no Google should not pay. Google just show a headline and the first bit. The reader then clicks and goes to the website.
Google is driving people to the site. If I had a business that could double your reader, you would gladly pay me.
Google does it for free.
You're not a good one are you? Or do you routinely ignore issues impacting the design of whatever thing you are building?
You solved nothing, and your solution wold create diplomatic and foreign affairs issues
That will work great when they cone fro another country, or Indian reservation~
One fine for all companies will be good:
Pull their corporate charter.
ore likely, the tax will be shifted to electricity in general. A 1%* tax on you electricity for roads et al.
*whatever.
Shocking.
"Anyone on the inside of the inside care to confirm or refute that?"
how do you refute nonsense?
While lab shopping does happen, it's onyl good for that ONE event and doesn't hold up over times.
If your thesis runs counter to C14, BUT goes along with current understanding of the field, then you have made a huge discovery. Far more important then the thesis itself.
The Hebrew word for day used in the genesis is account is “yom”, which is a definite 24-hour period.
If a day is an era, why are an evening and a morning even mentioned?
Adam was made on the sixth day (Genesis 1:26-31) which was supposedly thousand of years long. This was followed by the 7th day which was also thousands of years long. Following the 7th day, Adam fell into sin and was expelled from the Garden. This would make Adam Thousands of years old, but according to the Bible he was around 900.
How about: The passage is a parabole for mans fall from grace not literal in any way?
Becasue it would produce an abundance of Tulips.
heh.
BTW, I would be far more interested in Klingon Blues then Klingon Opera. I mean, Klingon Opera has been done..
OMG Klingon Blues. If I actual get a band together, That's it's name.
Because there isn't any other way to use renewable?
Solar furnaces, wind, hydro, nuclear, tidal. What about those? What about using wind generated energy that isn't needed at the time of generation? what about the idea that it's a scrubbers, and the petrol is a nice benefit?
[Condescending Wonka] Please, keep using nonsense and limited thinking to tell everyone why nothing will work. [/Condescending Wonka]
Why can't we put these on derrick in the ocean and use wind/wave power? or floating solar panels?
" IF it proves viable and real, which is another story altogether..."
no it isn't. That IS THIS story.
Mo, not pointless. we can create fuel from the air using solar or wind turbines.
Large trucks, heavy equipment, aircraft, ships aren't likely EVER to be electric.
So, use this to lower CO2 levels to pre industrialized levels, and fuel as we transition into a more electric vehicle society.
Tools for the transition are important for a transition.
Oil.
A) we need some CO2.
B) Biking is great for very short personal transportation when the weather allows for it.
C) We would need to plant 2 trillion trees to make up the the excess CO2 we spew into the air.
D) Ships, Trucks and factories aren't helped by you pithy short sighted 'solutions'.
E) I have never burned down a rain forest. Take it up with the respective countries
F) No, the answer isn't simple. If it were simple it would be done. If everyone rode a bike for every personal thing they did, and excess of CO2 would still be spewing into the air.
you're point only makes sense with wildly inaccurate numbers and impractical situations.
If I had a 2 MW wind turbine on my property, that would be FAR MORE energy then I need, so that excess would power this CO2 scrubbing plant.
However, there are very large areas of land that could be used to get energy to run these via wind, solar and Nuclear energy generation.