except it's not as much BS as people think. "and it's not because they couldn't afford it." Yes, it's becasue the buy into emotional documentarys at face value.
"and the remaining 28% would stay home." that's nonsense.
Anyways, the courts screwed us all when they became the ones to be the final choice. There should have been a second vote. There was more then enough proof of tampering and discrimination.
I would rather someone I didn't want to win, win in a clear victory then someone I want to win win under suspicious circumstances. The integrity of the system is far more important then who happens to win an election.
No, don't vote libertarian . Not becasue ti throws away your vote, but becasue their economic ideology has been shown not to work. Unless you feel people should get shit on and corporation should do what every they want. IN that case, yeah vote for more robber barons and pollution.
"t Perot's performance in the 90s actually got both sides talking economically" WTF? no. IN fact, it's a laughable idea.
No he wasn't resistant. Some of us here are old enough to remember when he did it. He brought all the disparate federal rules regarding the environment in'to on agency, and it was an executive order.
wrong. we can tell pretty precisely how much is in the air. We know what we emit, we know the absorption rate, and we can check for radioactive particles.
"Watts published an entire paper on siting problems for temperature recording stations." which were dealt with. And when you move what he considers problems the data still holds. SO that argument is dead. so shut up unless you have actual new data. Next: "geologic time scale" what you, and everyone else with argument from 1970 seem to fail to realize is that we are not talking about warming at a geological scale. We are talking about a much FASTER warming. This isn't thousands of years, its 100-200 years.
Oh, and becasue you didn't see the memo* the change is ON TOP OF normal cycles. Not in liue of, on top of. SO we can see the normal cycle, and the see warming on top of it. When the cycle is 'cooling' we don't return to previous temperature. What happens is about increase slows, and sometime goes flat, but doesn't return to the previous cooler temperature.
I used to believe in public discourse in scientific matter. Now I see all that does is cause people to spread lies and disinformation when the science is counter to there money making . Anti-vaxers, anti-fluoride, climate denialists,.. gah. SO any ignorant people sure they are correct in their ignorance. The n given a platform to speak there ignorance.
I think that we should go back into ivory towers.. preferable ivory tower with guns mounted on them. Even better: an education system the teaches critical thinking and science. Barring that, towers with guns. And rest assured the guns design by science will be far superior then any one else's guns.
"we literally don't have any direct measurements of that scale. " yes we do.
Jeez, it's like you appeared here from 1973. Or you're source are still stuck with arguments from 1973.
" I don't think anyone can definitively prove anything one way or the other yet. " That's nice, but you're wrong.
Ice core samples are a direct measurement, so..I'm not sure what you are talking about, but i am sure you don't know what the fuck you are talking about .
Becasue it's person? becasue these group have a history of taking out of context quotes? becasue person emails talking about work don't have the exactness of detail as published work?
Everything? all personal information? Are we suppose to stop all work every time these damn idiots request information? This is about an attack on scientists in order to stop there work and cherry pick quotes becasue the science doesn't back these religious blow hards.
" It doesn't belong with the other categories you mention." oh, you like it therefore it deserve and exception?
"Nutrition would be made available from well selected stocks" except that doesn't work. You end up with rotting food. Been tried, to hard to warehouse.
" form of hugely expensive apartments." they are not huge expensive. and living in barracks? really? did you even think about that for a second?
You're plan simply creates a lifestyle that doesn't go anywhere.
" use at the spoiled whim of the recipient." You're an idiot.
Clearly you aren't in the industry... or any industry where this would be used. Frankly, it's a huge deal. It isn't slow compared to human labor. When you factor in 24/7 operation, no breaks, and predictibal turn over. It's also cheap, so get 2. In warehouse and logistics, there is a need for something to sort bins, and there are case where this would work far better then people. Those are often uses where you can't be moving at a high rate of speed because you will damage the goods.
Having manufacturing move back to the US because it's completely robotic doesn't exactly help, at ll. You bring in all the waste with none of the jobs. Of course, the US should start preparing for the completely robotic workforce,. It will happen. And no, there is no a one for one replacement in jobs, its closer to every 100 job displaced by automation, 1 job is created.
They AC in an inexcusable jackass, but some parts of your port I read should be addressed.
"First you exploited the negroid part of the human population by loading them--by force--into ships and bringing them to your country in order for them to work as slaves for you with no renumeration, except for some good whippings so now and then. " I did no such thing, and I seriously doubt the AC did. Stopping blaming people for what other peoples ancestors did. No one in my family every owned a slave.
yeha heer comes the boats full of men armed with machine and a rocket launcher.
Yeah, one person NOT going to hold them off. You might, however, piss them off enough where they will send a rocket into the side of your boat, and come back later to,loot what ever is floating around. Or more likely spray you ship with bullets until you are dead.
Slashdot Mirror
except it's not as much BS as people think.
"and it's not because they couldn't afford it."
Yes, it's becasue the buy into emotional documentarys at face value.
do they have to be my remains?
"and the remaining 28% would stay home."
that's nonsense.
Anyways, the courts screwed us all when they became the ones to be the final choice. There should have been a second vote. There was more then enough proof of tampering and discrimination.
I would rather someone I didn't want to win, win in a clear victory then someone I want to win win under suspicious circumstances.
The integrity of the system is far more important then who happens to win an election.
No, don't vote libertarian . Not becasue ti throws away your vote, but becasue their economic ideology has been shown not to work. Unless you feel people should get shit on and corporation should do what every they want.
IN that case, yeah vote for more robber barons and pollution.
"t Perot's performance in the 90s actually got both sides talking economically"
WTF? no. IN fact, it's a laughable idea.
No he wasn't resistant. Some of us here are old enough to remember when he did it.
He brought all the disparate federal rules regarding the environment in'to on agency, and it was an executive order.
wrong. we can tell pretty precisely how much is in the air.
We know what we emit, we know the absorption rate, and we can check for radioactive particles.
"Watts published an entire paper on siting problems for temperature recording stations."
which were dealt with. And when you move what he considers problems the data still holds. SO that argument is dead. so shut up unless you have actual new data.
Next:
"geologic time scale"
what you, and everyone else with argument from 1970 seem to fail to realize is that we are not talking about warming at a geological scale. We are talking about a much FASTER warming. This isn't thousands of years, its 100-200 years.
Oh, and becasue you didn't see the memo* the change is ON TOP OF normal cycles. Not in liue of, on top of. SO we can see the normal cycle, and the see warming on top of it. When the cycle is 'cooling' we don't return to previous temperature. What happens is about increase slows, and sometime goes flat, but doesn't return to the previous cooler temperature.
I used to believe in public discourse in scientific matter. Now I see all that does is cause people to spread lies and disinformation when the science is counter to there money making . Anti-vaxers, anti-fluoride, climate denialists,.. gah. SO any ignorant people sure they are correct in their ignorance. The n given a platform to speak there ignorance.
I think that we should go back into ivory towers.. preferable ivory tower with guns mounted on them. Even better: an education system the teaches critical thinking and science. Barring that, towers with guns. And rest assured the guns design by science will be far superior then any one else's guns.
*becasue that don't send memos up you ass
Actually, it's pretty damn good.
"we literally don't have any direct measurements of that scale. "
yes we do.
Jeez, it's like you appeared here from 1973. Or you're source are still stuck with arguments from 1973.
" I don't think anyone can definitively prove anything one way or the other yet. "
That's nice, but you're wrong.
Ice core samples are a direct measurement, so..I'm not sure what you are talking about, but i am sure you don't know what the fuck you are talking about .
Becasue it's person? becasue these group have a history of taking out of context quotes? becasue person emails talking about work don't have the exactness of detail as published work?
Everything? all personal information? Are we suppose to stop all work every time these damn idiots request information? This is about an attack on scientists in order to stop there work and cherry pick quotes becasue the science doesn't back these religious blow hards.
" It doesn't belong with the other categories you mention."
oh, you like it therefore it deserve and exception?
"Nutrition would be made available from well selected stocks"
except that doesn't work. You end up with rotting food. Been tried, to hard to warehouse.
" form of hugely expensive apartments."
they are not huge expensive. and living in barracks? really? did you even think about that for a second?
You're plan simply creates a lifestyle that doesn't go anywhere.
" use at the spoiled whim of the recipient."
You're an idiot.
continue to scream and shout and grasp at straws while trying to use ad hom attacks to show there is no climate warming caused by man.
Beside, it won't matter becasue there god wouldn't let it happen.
"Foxglove is damn near undetectable"
did you just get here from 1950?
Clearly you aren't in the industry... or any industry where this would be used.
Frankly, it's a huge deal. It isn't slow compared to human labor. When you factor in 24/7 operation, no breaks, and predictibal turn over.
It's also cheap, so get 2.
In warehouse and logistics, there is a need for something to sort bins, and there are case where this would work far better then people. Those are often uses where you can't be moving at a high rate of speed because you will damage the goods.
The best way it to impose high tariffs on any product coming form a country that doesn't mean out federal environment, safety and pay standards.
I think you mean:
How are we going to please our human gods.
Having manufacturing move back to the US because it's completely robotic doesn't exactly help, at ll. You bring in all the waste with none of the jobs.
Of course, the US should start preparing for the completely robotic workforce,. It will happen.
And no, there is no a one for one replacement in jobs, its closer to every 100 job displaced by automation, 1 job is created.
They AC in an inexcusable jackass, but some parts of your port I read should be addressed.
"First you exploited the negroid part of the human population by loading them--by force--into ships and bringing them to your country in order for them to work as slaves for you with no renumeration, except for some good whippings so now and then. "
I did no such thing, and I seriously doubt the AC did.
Stopping blaming people for what other peoples ancestors did. No one in my family every owned a slave.
You would ave a point.. if this was posted 500 years ago.
Hi-tech; a sextant is not. Not by any stretch. Of course that doesn't mean it's useless.
Funny, my friends who have done similar voyages all used electronic equipment without any problems.
Speaking of stupid shit you post.
You're sig seems to be a reference to lemming suicides. They don't actually do that.
Cut Alaska in half, and Texas would the the 3rd largest state.
err.. troll editor known as Timothy.
actual evidence.
Not the I expect much from the troll known as Timothy.
yeha heer comes the boats full of men armed with machine and a rocket launcher.
Yeah, one person NOT going to hold them off. You might, however, piss them off enough where they will send a rocket into the side of your boat, and come back later to ,loot what ever is floating around.
Or more likely spray you ship with bullets until you are dead.
only until they loose enough fat, and the decompose quicker in the ocean. That is why WWZ pretty much had to make a 'magic' infection