" you are locked out for a reason keeps a sufficient percentage of potential intruders at bay." no it doesn't. It makes people feel good, but the VAST majority of people would never be robbed.
" which they buried in their files" If by that you mean kept on hand to refer to latter in order to properly respond and maintain a history, then correct.
"When you mention GPS to me, my first thought is the ability of surface or air unit to accurately calculate it's own grid position with minimal input from outside sources."
Do you know the S in GPS stand for Satellite?
Anyways, the often look at a tri-corder to determine where to go, so ti seems to me they had some sort of GPS. Where the S stands for System; which would be the ship.
"The difference being, if the ship ever left orbit..."
Why wouldn't the data be downloaded to the device? I thin it's safe to say the tri-croder can use it's initial reference point on the planet and do the necessary calculations?
"No ground crew ever seem to have the ability to say "We are at co-ordinate xx'xxx xx'xxx, which is 3 miles on a bearing of 15 degrees from your position"" no, but they often look at a device and say "They are this way."
Actually, we could do that. Take this into account: The voyage is leaving the solar system, we can still receive information form it and voyager is using about the same watts as a light bulb. So we could build a divide the attaches to the lapel and picked up in orbit.
This has nothing to do with technology. Someone violated the law. They are determining damages. The problem isn't technology, the problem the judge isn't allowed to determine Statuatory damages, and not educating the jury to determine proper damages.
They could do the same thing if I gave away cassettes tapes of music I recorded from the radio. Just becasue technology has made something easier, doesn't mean the people doing it shouldn't be punished.
This post is about your comment of technology, not the right or wrong of the law or punishment.
OR even better, you could do some actual fucking research and find out that the 'get rich now' attitude is almost non existent. no no, you keep propagating shit the insurance companies and other corporations keep lying to media companies and congress about.
Not to mention all you plan will do is make it less likely people who have been injured will even sue.
No,l its around selling the rights to listen to a copyrighted song in order to pay for everything that goes into creating and distributing the song, plus profit. Medium is irrelevant except when calculating costs.
It isn't a bunch of bits. It's peoples hard work distributed as a bunch of bits.
When deciding if two things are the same, you can't look at one word and then say they are the same, you need to look at both definitions and compare those:
Statutory damages: Statutory damages are a damage award in civil law, in which the amount awarded is stipulated within the statute rather than being calculated based on the degree of harm to the plaintiff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_damages
Fine: "A fine is money paid usually to superior authority, usually governmental authority, as a punishment for a crime or other offence. The amount of a fine can be determined case by case, but it is often announced in advance."
They aren't the same, anyone who tells you they are is ignorant.
Yes, the rest of the world takes peoples hard work and uses it for free. That doesn't make it right.
They have that [product because other people worked. We can discuss the details, but the fact of the matter is people need to get paid. The whole distribution chain that the copy from depends on it.
Is the RIAA and MPAA running amok? yes. Is this fine excessive? yes. Is copyright too long? yes. But that doesn't give anyone the right to copy other peoples works.
"With a wireless charger, there's no way to use the device while it's charging " not with the pads, but there are area wireless chargers, where anywhere in the area is using the charger, even if you are on the phone.
which would make excessively fast blinks useless as indicators for humans to read. You could probably build something to read them. Assuming the LED's emitting the data have a fast enough rising and falling time.
Slashdot Mirror
so, 50 people having trouble on the whole ocean with pirates s enough to keep you away? Do you even go outside? Take a bath? eat?
Floating containers? that mean booty!
No,l laziness keeps you away..or cowardice.
Stow the traditional sail and hoist the wingsail.
Just be sure all the equipment is rated for use at sea.
If you haven't learn to navigate by stars, and have a how to laminated and chained down.
The ocean is a maw that is just waiting for you to make a mistake.
Good Luck, good speed, and happy sailing.
.
" you are locked out for a reason keeps a sufficient percentage of potential intruders at bay."
no it doesn't. It makes people feel good, but the VAST majority of people would never be robbed.
" which they buried in their files"
If by that you mean kept on hand to refer to latter in order to properly respond and maintain a history, then correct.
They are slipping the virus into the OS instillation disk, how exactly would a "locked down system" stop that? No system can stop that.
"So today they "disrupted" (nonsense word) a botnet? "
what? disrupted isn't a nonsense word, in fact in this case, it's appropriate.
You might want to study the botnet ecology.
Engineering.
You are 'killed' and 'rebuilt' millions of times a day.
The more you know.
" OK in eight year olds"
no, it isn't. Interesting note, kids have to be taught to except that bullshit.
"When you mention GPS to me, my first thought is the ability of surface or air unit to accurately calculate it's own grid position with minimal input from outside sources."
Do you know the S in GPS stand for Satellite?
Anyways, the often look at a tri-corder to determine where to go, so ti seems to me they had some sort of GPS. Where the S stands for System; which would be the ship.
"The difference being, if the ship ever left orbit..."
Why wouldn't the data be downloaded to the device? I thin it's safe to say the tri-croder can use it's initial reference point on the planet and do the necessary calculations?
"No ground crew ever seem to have the ability to say "We are at co-ordinate xx'xxx xx'xxx, which is 3 miles on a bearing of 15 degrees from your position""
no, but they often look at a device and say "They are this way."
Actually, we could do that. Take this into account:
The voyage is leaving the solar system, we can still receive information form it and voyager is using about the same watts as a light bulb. So we could build a divide the attaches to the lapel and picked up in orbit.
IN a universe where FTL happens, it can be both!
Pushed by Intel. AMD is following... still.
This has nothing to do with technology.
Someone violated the law. They are determining damages.
The problem isn't technology, the problem the judge isn't allowed to determine Statuatory damages, and not educating the jury to determine proper damages.
They could do the same thing if I gave away cassettes tapes of music I recorded from the radio.
Just becasue technology has made something easier, doesn't mean the people doing it shouldn't be punished.
This post is about your comment of technology, not the right or wrong of the law or punishment.
OR even better, you could do some actual fucking research and find out that the 'get rich now' attitude is almost non existent.
no no, you keep propagating shit the insurance companies and other corporations keep lying to media companies and congress about.
Not to mention all you plan will do is make it less likely people who have been injured will even sue.
"Note to potential downloaders: just steal the goods you want. You'll get off a lot lighter that way."
distributors, not downloaders.
the term piracy in regards to works goes back about 600 years.
Read the history, then you will understand it is a perfectly cromulant use of the word.
No,l its around selling the rights to listen to a copyrighted song in order to pay for everything that goes into creating and distributing the song, plus profit. Medium is irrelevant except when calculating costs.
It isn't a bunch of bits. It's peoples hard work distributed as a bunch of bits.
When deciding if two things are the same, you can't look at one word and then say they are the same, you need to look at both definitions and compare those:
Statutory damages:
Statutory damages are a damage award in civil law, in which the amount awarded is stipulated within the statute rather than being calculated based on the degree of harm to the plaintiff
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_damages
Fine:
"A fine is money paid usually to superior authority, usually governmental authority, as a punishment for a crime or other offence. The amount of a fine can be determined case by case, but it is often announced in advance."
They aren't the same, anyone who tells you they are is ignorant.
Yes, the rest of the world takes peoples hard work and uses it for free. That doesn't make it right.
They have that [product because other people worked. We can discuss the details, but the fact of the matter is people need to get paid. The whole distribution chain that the copy from depends on it.
Is the RIAA and MPAA running amok? yes. Is this fine excessive? yes. Is copyright too long? yes. But that doesn't give anyone the right to copy other peoples works.
not quite. You seem to be comparing 100W to all Watts generated. It should be 100KWh to totals KWs per hour.
Still insignificant.
Since ionizing radiation doesn't have any impact on people, and it does have an impact on electronics, the answer is electronics.
" life forms already suffering from radiation caused diseases."
I'm curious about the alleged life form, because it certainly isn't humans.
"With a wireless charger, there's no way to use the device while it's charging "
not with the pads, but there are area wireless chargers, where anywhere in the area is using the charger, even if you are on the phone.
Never needing to plug in your cell phone? always charged when in your car, or restaurant or where ever.
are the advantages worth the extra cost? hard to say.
which would make excessively fast blinks useless as indicators for humans to read.
You could probably build something to read them. Assuming the LED's emitting the data have a fast enough rising and falling time.
.005%. Put it into Education and infrastructure.