Slashdot Mirror


Huge Diamond Deposits Revealed In Russia

An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from the Christian Science Monitor: "'Russia has just declassified news that will shake world gem markets to their core: the discovery of a vast new diamond field containing 'trillions of carats,' enough to supply global markets for another 3,000 years. The Soviets discovered the bonanza back in the 1970s beneath a 35-million-year-old, 62-mile diameter asteroid crater in eastern Siberia known as Popigai Astroblem. They decided to keep it secret, and not to exploit it, apparently because the USSR's huge diamond operations at Mirny, in Yakutia, were already producing immense profits in what was then a tightly controlled world market."

243 comments

  1. And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Impact the price of the Damned shiny rocks that I buy for my wife?

    1. Re:And how will this by preaction · · Score: 4, Funny

      If Russia can help it, not at all.

    2. Re:And how will this by wiedzmin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nope. The price of diamonds is completely artificial, agreed upon by all the suppliers and does not reflect their actual value or supply availability. It's the biggest case of non-penalized price fixing in the history of the world.
       
      I am curious if there's going to be a huge diamond down there... I'm assuming that they formed from the pressure created by the impact...

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    3. Re:And how will this by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful
      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:And how will this by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Funny

      In Russia, Diamond deposits reveal YOU!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:And how will this by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2

      There has long, long been a rumor that DeBeers will never open an "official" office in the US..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    6. Re:And how will this by niado · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to Wikipedia graphite in an 8.5 mile radius of the impact was turned into diamond due to impact pressure.

    7. Re:And how will this by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      This was my first thought, as my girlfriend knows to expect something shiny in the relatively near future

    8. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That meme's as old as you, JC.

    9. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A DVD about blood diamonds and their artificial worth is shiny.

    10. Re:And how will this by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      This was my first thought, as my girlfriend knows to expect something shiny in the relatively near future

      Ya, girls, like fish, like shiny things, so might I suggest a two-fer: silver or gold?

      Let me know how it turns out :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for oil. There's a ton of oil out there, but a cartel called "OPEC" artificially creates scarcity.

    12. Re:And how will this by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

      This Slashdot. You must be new here.

      What is this "wife" of which you speak?

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    13. Re:And how will this by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called price fixing.

      Bastards.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    14. Re:And how will this by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here is an informative article, a must-read if you're interested in diamonds. It's old (written in 1982) but everything still applies. In fact it's amazing that the public still hasn't gotten wise to the diamond racket in the 30 years since the article.

      http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/02/have-you-ever-tried-to-sell-a-diamond/304575/1/?google_editors_picks=true

    15. Re:And how will this by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Price is artificial.

    16. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Get a book called, "The Rise And Fall of Diamonds". Dimonds are nearly worthless rocks and are in no way precious. The only value associated with them is the value created by 100% artifically manipulated supply and demand. Before WWII, you literally couldn't give diamonds away. DeBeers PAID stars of the era to wear them as if they were precious. This created demand. Over the years, by means of extremely strict control of the market, people now pay a lot for what is literally a worthless gem, outside of industry.

      In parts of Africa, simply picking up a diamond is punishable by death. At one point in time, diamonds were harvested by forcing slaves to place buckets around their necks with twine. They would then crawl across the sand, shoulder to shoulder, dropping diamonds into their bucket. The noise was compared to machine guns in a war zone. Now you know why its illegal to pick up diamonds.

      Regardless of how you feel about diamonds, one things is for sure, the world would literally be a better place if the DeBeers family were removed from the face of the earth. In case you didn't know it, DeBeers is directly responsable for the resurgance of slavery and indentured servitude.

    17. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus it's only in Soviet Russia that diamond deposits reveal you.

      1. Find huge deposit.
      2. Sit on huge deposit for 30 years.
      3. ???
      4. Profit.

    18. Re:And how will this by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      This was my first thought, as my girlfriend knows to expect something shiny in the relatively near future

      Get a lab-created diamond. A huge, high-quality stone costs a fraction of the price of a natural one. Being real diamonds (carbon crystals), they're indistinguishable without special equipment. There's no reason to pay a fortune for gemstones today (unless you're rich or are stocking a museum, I guess). Find a good local jeweler; they can tell you more.

      --
      Visit the
    19. Re:And how will this by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "It's the biggest case of non-penalized price fixing in the history of the world."

      It would be interesting to see whether OPEC price fixing cost the world more than this cartel. I have a sneaking suspicion it would win hands down.

    20. Re:And how will this by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      He (Jeremiah Cornelius) came up with that meme before 'meme' was a word you whipper snapper.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    21. Re:And how will this by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The four C's. Cut, Color, Clarity, and Carat Weight. Cut is an artificial item, so let's focus on Color, Clarity and Carat. Of all the diamonds found in nature, what percentage of them are valuable to the consumer market? Low grade yellows and industrial diamonds are in fact dirt cheap by comparison.

      BTW, I'm married. I don't discount the fact there is pricing fixing going on, I just questions the natural ratio of quality diamonds that we all know and love (or she does anyways)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    22. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 70s maybe. These days the world is pumping all it can muster, using advanced extraction techniques, which will likely cause the crash to be faster than it otherwise would have.

    23. Re:And how will this by martinX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The price of the diamonds may go down, but the amount of money you are required to spend on your wife to demonstrate your love for her will remain fixed. Bigger diamond, more diamonds, platinum band, all these options are open to her to make sure you don't spend less on her than she expects. And she expects
      you to spend enough on her that you notice the cost. Not enough to cause resentment, but enough to delay discretionary and hobby purchases for yourself for anything up to year or so, depending on the occasion (e.g. an eternity ring).

      This will elevate her status amongst her peers, confirming to them and her family that she made the right choice in a lifetime mate: someone who has the financial wherewithal to make these purchases and someone who has an emotional attachment to her that's strong enough to actually do it. It will also increase her financial self-worth, giving her something she can personally contribute to the family (at high emotional cost) in times of great need, or something of intrinsic and emotional value she can hand on to favoured descendants. At worst, she can flog it off if you separate.

      Buy these things for her, and be happy with your lot. With luck, you may get a blowjob on your birthday.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    24. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Suggestion: stop buying useless things and tell her to stop being so superficial and useless.

    25. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you even know a woman? She would not like this. She wouldn't like the truth and she wouldn't like you lying to her.

    26. Re:And how will this by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      De Beers presently sets their price at roughly that of the price to have one manufactured by Gemesis.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    27. Re:And how will this by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Link to a company that sells them? I've been having a hard time finding them

    28. Re:And how will this by celtic_hackr · · Score: 4, Informative

      DeBeers had an office in the US. They used to own the diamond mine down in Arkansas. But due to the Apartheid thing, and the price fixing, they were forced out, and on the way out they dynamited the diamond mine rather than leave an operation working mine. Almost all the diamonds coming out of Diamond Crater are gem quality. The Star of Arkansas came from there. A beautiful colored diamond.

    29. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering the effort that the diamond cartels have made to discredit lab grown stones a "worse because they're too perfect" I have qualms trusting them as far as I can throw South Africa. If they say the stones are rare I bet they've got enough to bling out the grand canyon.

    30. Re:And how will this by jedwidz · · Score: 3, Funny

      50.25% of us are wise to it. Only the other 49.75% matter.

    31. Re:And how will this by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      The four C's. Cut, Color, Clarity, and Carat Weight. Cut is an artificial item, so let's focus on Color, Clarity and Carat. Of all the diamonds found in nature, what percentage of them are valuable to the consumer market? Low grade yellows and industrial diamonds are in fact dirt cheap by comparison.

      BTW, I'm married. I don't discount the fact there is pricing fixing going on, I just questions the natural ratio of quality diamonds that we all know and love (or she does anyways)

      There's not much to question. It's pretty well known that De Beers had kept prices artificially high. And if that wasn't enough, now you see retailers charging premiums for shitty brown diamonds because they are now calling them "chocolate". Or yellow ones "canary yellow". They're made from carbon. I'd say that carbon heat and pressure are pretty plentiful on earth. I never thought about it, but I was pretty pissed off when I learned that diamonds will burn just like coal would in a fire.

    32. Re:And how will this by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      Gemesis ( http://gemesis.com/ is where I got my fiancee's diamond several months ago. I have nothing but good things to say about them, especially about their customer service. There are a handful of other places though, however the only one I can recall is Apollo Diamonds, which was bought around the start of the year, I assume for industrial use. Shoot me an email if you'd like to know more.

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    33. Re:And how will this by Immerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In fact a CVD-grown diamond can be far superior to any natural stone you could ever find - with potentially zero inclusions or other defects. In fact if not for the laser-inscribed serial number on them the only way they could be distinguished from natural diamonds is that they are "too perfect"

      As a bonus instead of funneling money into an abusive cartel you'll be supporting an industry which hopes to eventually be able to produce bulk laboratory-grade diamonds of arbitrary size, allowing the creation of things like diamond-based microprocessors which would be impossible with even the least-flawed natural stones (diamond is a dopeable electric insulator and an *incredible* thermal conductor, making it ideal for high-performance semiconductors)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    34. Re:And how will this by pspahn · · Score: 1

      The poor bastards that marry these women...

      Yes, I have my fears of commitment just like any other guy, but at least I can rest easy knowing the current lady being given consideration could care less about all this stuff.

      She'll only turn into a shallow bitch if you let her.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    35. Re:And how will this by shiftless · · Score: 1

      I'd rather blow my brains out than live like that.

    36. Re:And how will this by pnot · · Score: 4, Informative

      That article is an excerpt from Epstein's book The Diamon Invention, which is available in full online on the author's website. It's an amazing read.

    37. Re:And how will this by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      It will also increase her financial self-worth, giving her something she can personally contribute to the family (at high emotional cost) in times of great need, or something of intrinsic and emotional value she can hand on to favoured descendants. At worst, she can flog it off if you separate.

      As long as you make sure most of the value is in the precious metals of the setting. Diamonds aren't worth shit for resale.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    38. Re:And how will this by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      Do you even know a woman? She would not like this. She wouldn't like the truth and she wouldn't like you lying to her.

      Obviously you don't lie about it -- that's a terrible way to start a marriage. There are lots of women who are fine with lab-created gems. I'm dating one right now.

      --
      Visit the
    39. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Diamonds, tennis-bracelets, rings, necklaces, whatever.

      If marketing-men tell the women that men need to buy these to "prove" their "love", they can live off the labor of those enslaved by their little scheme.

      When I see diamonds, its obvious that these things are absolutely useless for anything but some rather esoteric applications, which would demand the perfection of a manufactured diamond, or a run of the mill abrasive.

      If its glittery jewelry, go for the optical stuff - it can be manufactured much cheaper than trying to find them in nature. Hell, so is a Coke bottle.

      Why aren't women as enthused over a gift of carborundum? Marketing.

      Its much like religion, where microphone-men hock up all sorts of stuff about demonstrating one's faith while passing the plate.

      Marketing heads tell us to work our a** off and give them the nectar of our efforts, and we - being the obedient sheeple we are - obey.

      The marketing head gets rich while the rest of us try to earn a wage.

      DeBeers gets rich by convincing men that they have to be paid before we can get access to women's heavenly parts.

      And we pay. And pay. And pay. We are sooooo dumb!.

    40. Re:And how will this by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      A local brick and mortor store that does custom jewelry is also a good place to try. They'll have sources that aren't available to the general public and can also help you with the mounting.

      --
      Visit the
    41. Re:And how will this by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Intersting to bring in "blood diamonds" to the story. It's a way to control lots of diamonds not controlled by De Beers by having the public avoid them. Note that Zaire which was listed in the end of the article as a possible threat to the cartel is now a part of the Kimberly process and its diamonds are not "blood diamonds" despite the civil wars that occurred while many were mined. How much of this is real, how much is influenced by De Beers, and how much is fabricated?

    42. Re:And how will this by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Use a grandmother's diamond ring instead of a new one. Buy one at a pawn shop. Get a sapphire or emerald or ruby. Buying a new diamond would be succumbing to the world's most successful advertising campaign.

    43. Re:And how will this by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And this price you pay and the expection that you will pay it has been carefully orchestrated and programmed into your brain. 100 years ago very few people purchased diamonds for engagements and those that did were not buying expensive ones.

      Also, she will not be able to flog it off for anything like what you pay for it. When it leaves the store it will drop in value faster than an automobile leaving the lot.

    44. Re:And how will this by anubi · · Score: 0

      I am puzzled why we do not take this more seriously.

      My belief is that the derivative of the logistic equation, distorted by technological advances combined with economic pressures, has its peak shifted to the right by quite some amount. Meaning the slope-up is gradual, an extended peak, and a cliff-like demise when a failing economy can no longer finance extraction costs. The area under the curve is constant ( total petroleum on this planet ), but the extraction rate is astronomical right now in a geologic sense.

      I do not feel the curve shown on the Wikipedia page conveys the full impact of the problem. Its the derivative of that curve that does. That would be the oil extraction RATE. Yes, there is lots of oil on this planet - very hard to extract oil. Will our science and economy support the extraction of it?

      My own feeling is I am seeing a re-run of "Rat Attack" , but its humans instead of rats, and oil instead of bamboo seeds. When the extraction rates start declining, all hell is going to break loose.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    45. Re:And how will this by pongo000 · · Score: 2

      DeBeers had an office in the US. They used to own the diamond mine [craterofdi...tepark.com] down in Arkansas. But due to the Apartheid thing, and the price fixing, they were forced out, and on the way out they dynamited the diamond mine rather than leave an operation working mine. Almost all the diamonds coming out of Diamond Crater are gem quality. The Star of Arkansas came from there. A beautiful colored diamond.

      Nowhere in the site link you provided was DeBeers mentioned. In fact, there is no "mine" in the traditional sense of a hole in the ground. The area sits atop a kimberlite pipe; the area is continually turned over to expose new material. I've been there several times; it's nothing more than a large mud field (when wet) or furrowed hardpack (when dry).

    46. Re:And how will this by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Good god man, what you describe is refered to as a "gold digger". Seriously, you don't have to buy women, but if you really think it is necassary then a hooker is far, far, cheaper than a gold digger.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    47. Re:And how will this by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Cubic zirconia is *not* diamond. I'm not downplaying CZ as a material to be used in jewelry. It's nice stuff. Just don't confuse the two.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    48. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another fine gem from that horde is the Arkenstone which belonged to the Durin family.

    49. Re:And how will this by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      What does cubic zirconia have to do with anything???

    50. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CZ is something else. GP is referring to real diamonds produced by man through technological process. Since they can be created at will, the cartels saw it as a threat and attempted to discredit it somehow. The diamonds are "inferiour because they're superiour", if that makes any sense at all.

    51. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What lie? Here's your fucking diamond. That's the truth. The circumstances surrounding its creation are irrelevant.

    52. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's still mighty pricey though, with a 1.0 carat diamond being in the range of a few thousand bucks. A cubic zirconia of the same size runs about $280. Considering these things are bought for looks, they both fit the need, and no layman could ever tell the difference.

    53. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And she expects you to spend enough on her that you notice the cost. Not enough to cause resentment, but enough to delay discretionary and hobby purchases for yourself for anything up to year or so, depending on the occasion (e.g. an eternity ring).

      This will elevate her status amongst her peers,

      I suggest you find a girl whose peer group (herself included) has evolved enough to be distinguished from monkeys. I'm married 5 years. My wife got a nice ring but nothing huge and it did not delay our spending. We spent more money on our honeymoon than the wedding. And I'm sure she knows she's never likely to get an eternity ring from me.

    54. Re:And how will this by martinX · · Score: 2

      I have resisted the little suggestions for an eternity ring ("what, has it been that long already?") and my observations are based on other women, not my saint of a wife. We even went cheap on the wedding (and proud of it!).

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    55. Re:And how will this by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Seriously, please site where I can find someone with this technology. Someone that actually sells real synthetic diamonds (crystal lattice and all). It would be the first I've heard of it.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    56. Re:And how will this by burning-toast · · Score: 1

      Well, you can have your cremated remains turned into a diamond at least. Does that count?

      http://www.lifegem.com/secondary/LifeGemFAQ2006.aspx

      - Toast

    57. Re:And how will this by martinX · · Score: 1

      And with the price of gold so high, I've seen lots of little gold-buying kiosks popping up in the shopping centres. Problem is that most of the gold rings in Australia are 9k, unless you know what you are looking for.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    58. Re:And how will this by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you've memorized all the diamond industry marketing material.
      What do any of those four things have to do with the value of a rock?
      You could come up with a set of metrics for valuing lumps of coal and it still wouldn't change the fact that a lump of coal is worthless.

      You want to know how valuable your diamond is? Try to sell it.

    59. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used diamonds sell just fine. Find another angle to rant about dipshit...

    60. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google points to these guys: http://d.neadiamonds.com/ . I know someone who intentionally got a synthetic gem in their wedding ring, so it is definitely possible.

    61. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know this because she told you? Good luck, pal.

    62. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any woman that expects me to buy expensive things for her isn't a woman i want to marry.

      fuck off down the road to some other shmuck, thanks.

    63. Re:And how will this by polymeris · · Score: 1

      Not that much, I think. I am not an expert, but if those are impact metamorphism diamonds, they are probably polycrystalline (composed of lots of small grains of different size and orientation) and not well suited for jewelry.

    64. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're indistinguishable without special equipment

      The equipment is not really so special, synthetic diamonds have an unmistakeably greater amount of fluorescence. But whatever... a diamond is a diamond.

    65. Re:And how will this by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 2

      Buy these things for her, and be happy with your lot. With luck, you may get a blowjob on your birthday.

      You know, being north American has it's draw backs. Absurd materialistic expectations from wives don't really have anything to do with love and marriage. I call myself lucky to be European. EU women -and men- tend to be a little less on the money.

      (Besides that, I admire the USA for the research and business culture that brought prosperity to many parts of the world.)

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    66. Re:And how will this by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      I guess, she is going to fall in hook, line and sinker.

    67. Re:And how will this by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      DeBeers gets rich by convincing men that they have to be paid before we can get access to women's heavenly parts.

      Would it not be the women who are being convinced? I mean otherwise it wouldn't matter.

    68. Re:And how will this by kav2k · · Score: 2

      Tell that to Minecraft players..

    69. Re:And how will this by neyla · · Score: 3, Informative

      No they don't. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/02/have-you-ever-tried-to-sell-a-diamond/304575/

      Short version: If you try to *sell* diamonds, you quickly discover they're now worth a fraction of what they where "worth" when you where the buyer. This is true to some degree with everything ofcourse, but to a much larger degree with diamonds than with other valuables such as precious metals.

    70. Re:And how will this by neyla · · Score: 1

      I dunno. At this point the bullshit around diamonds is sufficiently well-known that I'd expect most smart women to not even want them. Among my friends I can't think of any who has diamonds in their engagement or wedding-rings, and it's not because they couldn't afford it.

    71. Re:And how will this by strack · · Score: 1

      sounds like a bitch

    72. Re:And how will this by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      There's no reason to pay a fortune for gemstones today

      Try explaining that to a woman...

      --
      No sig today...
    73. Re:And how will this by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you don't have to buy women, but if you really think it is necassary then a hooker is far, far, cheaper than a gold digger.

      Plus you can change hookers at will.

      Changing a gold digger for (eg.) a younger model is a long, painful, extremely expensive process.

      --
      No sig today...
    74. Re:And how will this by justforgetme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      3.1. Announce it woldwide and start frenetically building extraction mines
      3.2. Watch the prices of diamonds tumble while you build the extraction mines due to other providers making sellout contracts to insure buyers
      3.3. Buy an shitload of diamonds at reduced price and demolish the extraction mines
      4. sell the diamonds once prices get restored for a profit

      --
      -- no sig today
    75. Re:And how will this by slim · · Score: 2

      Well, 'meme' was coined in The Selfish Gene, published 1976. I think the 'meme' meme postdates the 'Soviet Russia' meme.

    76. Re:And how will this by Sique · · Score: 1

      Luckily I live in a non-diamond-proposing part of the world. :) Diamond-rings are some item in U.S. movies like Lincoln Town Car cabs or phone numbers that start with 555. They just add some local flair to the plot like the pyramids do for a movie set in ancient Egypt.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    77. Re:And how will this by Peter5930 · · Score: 2

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_diamond/

      We've been able to grow diamonds (real diamonds, not substitute materials) since 1954.

    78. Re:And how will this by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Eh, most girls prefer a nice pearl necklace.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    79. Re:And how will this by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      Fascinating article. Thanks for the link.

    80. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does the woman contribute to me to confirm that I am making the right choice in marrying her? Our society is royally fucked up.

    81. Re:And how will this by geekoid · · Score: 2

      do they have to be my remains?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    82. Re:And how will this by geekoid · · Score: 1

      except it's not as much BS as people think.
      "and it's not because they couldn't afford it."
      Yes, it's becasue the buy into emotional documentarys at face value.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    83. Re:And how will this by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It may not be diamond, but it will be something.
      Assuming you are both human and neither one of you is a robot.

      While the GP portrays a sad view of it, the fact is people need something they value that they can tell others about.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    84. Re:And how will this by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " Absurd materialistic expectations from wives "
      that's not really as common as the GP makes it look.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    85. Re:And how will this by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Even then, it's difficult. Precious metals are difficult to sell. For gold, in the quantities found in jewellery, the cost of verifying the quality is often close to the value of the metal.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    86. Re:And how will this by norminator · · Score: 1

      Natural diamonds are for hipsters, apparently.

    87. Re:And how will this by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1

      Here's an interesting related article from 2003 Wired: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/diamond.html

      Wikipedia maintains a list of synthetic diamond manufacturers at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_synthetic_diamond_manufacturers

    88. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel so manipulated by marketing types. They do not seem to be restrained by common sense.

      Am I not proving my love to a woman by inviting her into my life and *gasp* signing legal papers giving her joint custody into everything I have ever done and ever will do?

      I have tried to be fiscally responsible. I am asked to show my love by buying a sample of some way overpriced substance we have absolutely no use for? I do this because I do not want to appear "cheap"? So I look foolish instead? I feel I am only giving proof that I am easily manipulated.

      Maybe women are looking for easily manipulatable men and DeBeers assists women in locating men of that mindset, just as a lot of colleges offer businessmen a pre-screened assortment of prospective employees that have demonstrated a tolerance for bullshit.

    89. Re:And how will this by anubi · · Score: 1

      Its a shame I cannot simply donate $5000 to a charity of her choice rather than be forced to subsidize a corporation I have absolutely no love for - just for the sake of "proving" my love for her.

      It ought to be obvious... this diamond mentality is nothing more than a demonstration of our obedience to do really asinine things just because we are told to do so.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    90. Re:And how will this by burning-toast · · Score: 1

      Nope, loved ones remains (or even just hair I think) can be as well.

      I guess it's not just the remains used to make the diamond, but rather, it's the specific additions from the remains which impurify or "add character" to the diamond by adding color and whatnot. I assume that the base for the diamond would be provided by the company.

      Also, judging by their pages, it looks like you can pickup loose stones of whatever color you want as well.

      - Toast

    91. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have resisted the little suggestions for an eternity ring ("what, has it been that long already?") and my observations are based on other women, not my saint of a wife. We even went cheap on the wedding (and proud of it!).

      My wife and I went cheap and spent what we saved on the honeymoon. Some of the best experiences of our lives.

    92. Re:And how will this by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The four C's. Cut, Color, Clarity, and Carat Weight.

      ... are only relevant for the dull and boring "decorative" or jewellery diamond industry. These factors are completely irrelevant for the far more interesting diamonds which contain inclusions that can tell us about the deep history of the planet.

      Oh, what's this in the corner of my wallet? A 0.5 carat diamond. Meh.

      I'm a geologist. To me, diamonds are terribly interesting and valuable. I can't see why people ruin them by cutting them up, destroying their idoemorphic crystal forms and fascinating growth textures and replacing them with flat polished planes. A complete waste.

      Going back to the original subject ... I thought from the headline that this might be Popigai. When the confirmation of the structure as an astrobleme ("astrobleme" is correct ; TFS is wrong) came through in the mid-'90s, presence of micro-diamond was one of the cited pieces of evidence. I did wonder then if this could be from the basement. Seems so. But there were enough other indications of extreme strains and high pressures that the diagnosis didn't rely on the micro-diamond.

      I still want to see a kimberlite eruption. From a suitably large distance.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    93. Re:And how will this by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      If you're in the UK, the next time I'm melting down lead for diving weights, I'll melt out some of the diamond-coated tungsten carbide blocks from my existing weights. I've got a couple of kilos, containing maybe a gramme or two of diamond.

      (For rock drilling, tungsten-carbide "cutters" are coated with synthetic diamond to create "Poly-crystalline Diamond Compacts" or "PDC" bits ; the cutters are then rigidly mounted in a machined steel "matrix" that channels the flow of drilling fluid and cuttings away from the working face of the bit. When these cutters break off, or the matrix comes in contact with the rock and is torn to dust, the "cutters" (a.k.a "compacts" ; I think different companies use different names ; bit selection is a someone-else problem) can be left loose on the bottom of the hole, and tend to destroy the next bit sent down the hole (change out cost ~$200,000 in machinery and personnel rental ; bits are a trivial $30,000 to $150,000), so "junk baskets" are generally run to try to collect the fragments. I have to extract the cutters from the rest of the junk, count them, and we try to work out if we've got everything out of the hole. I used to keep the pieces, as being interesting materials. And at 1.5 times the density of lead alone, they're good additions to my diving weights.)

      FYI, the diamond is grown in situ on the surface of the WC cutters. The processes used vary, if you believe the manufacturer's blurb, but are variants of vapour deposition. The diamond isn't available separately.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    94. Re:And how will this by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      The cost of verifying the quality is that of several seconds work and about a hundred beers at a bar (£300~350 here) of resistance meter. What you get charged is something different. (Bear in mind that you also need to pay for the tester's experience and understanding ; not necessarily cheap. I'm not a gemmologist or jeweller, but I know enough about mineralogy to realise that it's not as simple as it looks.)

      There are a huge number of scammers in the "cash-for-gold" game. Use the high street and get competing quotes from the 3 oldest jewellers in town, who have a local reputation to maintain. Then, if you can beat that price, go for it.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    95. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You could do whatever you want.

      What isn't obvious is why you would 'love' someone that has a mentality that you despise.

      Sounds like a match made in heaven.

    96. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CZ and diamand have a different feel, weight, and temperature. You just aren't observant which is why you don't understand the appeal.

    97. Re:And how will this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't care less.

    98. Re:And how will this by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      There's no mine because DeBeers dynamited the field years ago. The state turned it in to a tourist attraction. I've been there myself. The story is told inside the park if you care to actually do any reading, rather than just being negative. My visit paid for itself in semiprecious gemstones. A diamond was found while I was there, along with numerous other (semi-)precious stones. No, it's no longer a mine, hence the State Park designation. It was a mine, a DeBeers mine. As to the fact it is a kimberlite pipe, what else would you expect? Where else do you expect to find diamonds? Up Laurance Olivier's ass?

  2. Wow, this is REALLY old news by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember learning about DeBeers and having this bit of information come up at some point.... lots of people in Russia dying mysterious deaths surrounding the topic of diamonds in Russia.

    Diamonds are fairly plentiful and common. That they are expensive and considered valuable is marketing... or racketeering... whatever you want to call it.

    1. Re:Wow, this is REALLY old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I remember learning about DeBeers and having this bit of information come up at some point.... lots of people in Russia dying mysterious deaths surrounding the topic of diamonds in Russia.

      People dying mysteriously in Russia isn't really enough to cause anyone to ask further questions. It's probably more of a deterrent.

    2. Re:Wow, this is REALLY old news by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Collusion is the term you are looking for.

      Absolute rarity is not be the entire thing with value, though... demand is important too... and faith, apparently. Must be the same reason that diamonds harvested by poor in wartorn shitholes are more valuable than synthesised ones.

      The bismuth in your pepto-bismol is much less prevalent than silver (there is roughly twice as much bismuth as gold, and 20x as much silver as gold), yet it is considerably cheaper.

    3. Re:Wow, this is REALLY old news by Formalin · · Score: 1

      On second thought, maybe racketeering is (was) right at least, when de beers pressured others to enter their cartel, using their near monopoly to become even more near monopoly...

      But they ain't the only show in town anymore, and diamonds are still expensive...

    4. Re:Wow, this is REALLY old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that they want you to know about the existence of this NOW and not earlier.

      They want to be able to say Russia will be able to control the industrial diamond market, just like China is able to control the rare earth metals market.

      What I don't know is exactly why they chose this precise point in time to make this knowledge to be allowed to be known.

    5. Re:Wow, this is REALLY old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly, extracting, refining, cutting, and polishing costs money. Precious minerals and metals will always have value and are always going to be useful. Of course, the rarest and most useful of rare earth metals are extra valuable.

      Irridium for example. Nothing compares to a farm, seeds, candles, flint, sustainable power, and water purification though.

    6. Re:Wow, this is REALLY old news by erroneus · · Score: 1

      All other factors being equal (cut, clarity, flaws, etc) diamonds are priced higher than rubies and yet of the two, rubies are more rare.

      There's more to it than only that. One is public perception and expectation. People expect diamond to be expensive and sellers are willing to meet that expectation with a higher price. If someone lowered the price of diamonds, they would actually sell fewer of them. People usually believe they are getting more or better when they spend more. In other words, people offer too much trust to sellers.

  3. Good News by P-niiice · · Score: 2

    please let this drop diamond prices down to what they should be and force deBeers to find other ways to earn money like flipping burgers or whatever they have where they are

    1. Re:Good News by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      please let this drop diamond prices down to what they should be

      And what price should they be?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Good News by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      The price that would reflect the real supply rather than the monopoly and cartel controlled supply.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Good News by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      please let this drop diamond prices down to what they should be

      What do you need diamonds for? Industrial purposes? The whole consumer market, both supply and demand, is an invention. They managed to convince people that they wanted them, then they constrained the supply, then they invented a pricing scheme (two months salary (or whatever it is)) that creates the seller's dream of a perfectly tiered market.

    4. Re:Good News by zlives · · Score: 1

      its the buyers fault as much as D-cartels... only YOU can stop diamond cartels :)

    5. Re:Good News by chemicaldave · · Score: 1

      Sure they could get cheaper, but they'll also be larger and of better quality. The difference would be that your spouse would now demand the diamond that X amount of dollars would buy.

    6. Re:Good News by Nursie · · Score: 1

      There is just no way I'm spending to months salary on shiny rocks for a girl. Unless it's twice this month's, which would still be $0 (taking a little career break :)

      I mean, that's ludicrous. That's a serious proportion of a car, or mortgage paid down, or hell, an amazing holiday.

    7. Re:Good News by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      This isn't really news, Canada has large diamond depots in the far north as well. Most are in production now, we've got several others that were discovered under the permafrost as well but they're not being mined. They're even larger than the ~28million metric ton Victor Pit open mine.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:Good News by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      Problem is that as well as being shiny shiny diamond is also quite useful if you want to cut things. Which means that a large part of the diamond market is industrial.

      It doesn't help that Notch has given a new generation a love of the things. And you need a lot of diamonds for that breastplate.

    9. Re:Good News by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Most industrial diamonds these days are manufactured diamonds. Much cheaper to do that than to pull them out of the ground.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    10. Re:Good News by zlives · · Score: 1

      beat me to it :)

    11. Re:Good News by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." -- K (MIB)

      The cartels could be stopped, but unfortunately only through collective action. Not going to happen.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    12. Re:Good News by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that the only reason there is any real demand for diamonds at all is because they are expensive.
      They are a way to show off wealth, and if they became as cheap as supply/demand would make them then demand would go to about 0.

      And a lot of rich people would lose trillions of dollars overnight.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    13. Re:Good News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun being single for the rest of your life buddy.

    14. Re:Good News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Depends on the girl.

    15. Re:Good News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap enough that I can afford a big diamond ring for my gf (while still leaving enough money over to buy a new beast of a games machine).

    16. Re:Good News by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      please let this drop diamond prices down to what they should be and force deBeers to find other ways to earn money

      TFA doesn't talk about gems, only industrial uses. Maybe they don't have big diamonds from the astrobleme -- or maybe they do but are keeping it quiet to keep the price up. De Beers is likely to be involved in the marketing if so.

    17. Re:Good News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't really news, Canada has large diamond depots...

      Really? Can I stop at the depot and get some?

    18. Re:Good News by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Many industrial diamonds are manufactured, not mined, but by no means all. Natural diamond can easily be twice the hardness of artificial diamond (and therefore up to five or six times the hardness of, say, synthetic corundum). Toughness is another issue - which is not the same as hardness.

      PDC (polycrystalline diamond compact) drilling bits are common and popular - probably "dominant" - in deep rock drilling, but for extremely hard formations "natural diamond" drill bits are often preferred. I've run one natural diamond bit for 10 days on-bottom, drilling alternating granite and sandstone. It looked almost like new when we had to pull it (other tools had broken). The PDC we replaced it with lasted just a couple of days and died on the next granite.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  4. Industrial quality? by holmstar · · Score: 2

    Reading through TFA it sounds like these are industrial quality diamonds rather than the sparkly, clear, goes on a ring type. Still a big find though.

    1. Re:Industrial quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol diamond = diamond

    2. Re:Industrial quality? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Reading through TFA it sounds like these are industrial quality diamonds

      When I read the headline, my first thought was "The Bear and the Dragon in real life". This is a bit disheartening, but still... (I'm actually reading it right now, talk of a coincidence!)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Industrial quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For sale: raw, black porous diamonds cylinders padded with wood around them. May require some pressure to become clear and shatter-proof.

    4. Re:Industrial quality? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      lol diamond = diamond

      No, it does not, as long as people are willing to pay for the pretty ones. The majority of diamonds that are mined are great for industrial use (drill bits, etc.) but not very nice to look at. Add to that the price fixing fostered by DeBeers, which is really just a 'legalized' organized crime ring, and diamond != diamond.

    5. Re:Industrial quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol diamond = diamond

      And you wonder why you never get laid.

    6. Re:Industrial quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been a few years since I read the book, but in The Bear and The Dragon, didn't the Russians discover gold and oil rather than diamonds?

    7. Re:Industrial quality? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      The difference is only in marketing. One successful marketing campaign can turn industrial diamonds into gem quality diamonds.

    8. Re:Industrial quality? by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Now that you can make large diamonds cheaply with vapor deposition, things have already changed.

      Back in the old days a small defect made a diamond worth far less. Now I've seen people charge more for diamonds with small defects because "you can tell it's a natural diamond, not a man-made diamond." And even the old, worthless, yellow "honey diamonds" are commanding higher prices.

    9. Re:Industrial quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. Man made diamonds do not ever reach the really rare flawless qualities. Only the upper mid range (VS, occasionally VVS). Color, for sure man made are perfect.

    10. Re:Industrial quality? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      These aren't even proper diamonds. Apparently, it's some strange combination of a regular diamond structure with that of lonsdalite. It has some very neat properties from industrial use perspective (up to twice the hardness of regular diamonds - think about what that means for tools), but it's not exactly "shiny".

    11. Re:Industrial quality? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      To be even more specific, let me translate a quote from one of the scientists involved (source):

      "This isn't even diamond. The hardness of this phase (lonsdalite) is 1.54 higher than that of diamond, and here we have nanometer-sized crystals of cubic diamonds and lonsdalite - it's a very viscous matrix, which is what defines the extraordinary qualities of the Popygay impactite. The proportion of lonsdalite in some of these samples is as high as 70%."

      Also, according to the same article, the market price of those crystals is estimated as $2-2.5 per carat. For comparison, jewelry-grade diamonds go for thousands of dollars per carat.

    12. Re:Industrial quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading through TFA it sounds like these are industrial quality diamonds

      When I read the headline, my first thought was "The Bear and the Dragon in real life". This is a bit disheartening, but still... (I'm actually reading it right now, talk of a coincidence!)

      I thought this too. Next: war w/ china.

    13. Re:Industrial quality? by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Actually some CVD techniques create diamonds far exceeding that of natural stones, with a level of perfection on the same order as that of a silicone wafer in a microprocessor plant. These stones are *perfect*, and the folks growing them hope to eventually grow them large enough be able to sell them to semiconductor plants - diamond is dopeable and is a truly astounding thermal conductor, but even the best natural diamonds are far too flawed to create arrays of 10nm transistors on. Sadly the growth mechanism for perfect diamond involves growing it vertically - you can slice it into wafers to seed multiple columns growing in parallel, but that's no help for growing industrial-sized diamond wafers, for those they simply have to wait until the pillars grow wide enough to be suitable, and the cross sectional width of perfect diamond only grows as some fraction of a percent of the height.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    14. Re:Industrial quality? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Not really. Diamond is a crystaline form of carbon. The carbon itself isn't worth much so the value must be the form it is in.

      When carbon is put under sufficient pressure it crystalises into diamond. However the vast majority of those diamonds end up small and/or full of flaws. These small flawed diamonds are cheap enough (whether formed naturally or aritficially) that we coat drills and cutting discs with them.

      Gemstone diamonds are much rarer naturally and harder to produce artificially (though CVD is starting to make them easier to produce artificially).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    15. Re:Industrial quality? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      soo. Space Diamonds!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. Diamonds are Carbon - Common as Dirt by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unlike Gold, or even many other gemstones which have a rarity that enhances value? Diamonds are only of spectacular value, when they achieve very large carat size, without flaws or inclusions.

    But there's a mystique , deliberately crafted, to conflate the value of a 2-carat Zales engagement ring with something like the Koh-i-noor.

     

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Diamonds are Carbon - Common as Dirt by vlm · · Score: 1

      Diamonds are only of spectacular value, when they achieve very large carat size, without flaws or inclusions

      HUGE industrial demand, compared to gold. Gold has some industrial demand, but if diamond was as cheap per pound as carbide or HSS you'd see a lot more cutting tools using it. Imagine metal cutting tools using a diamond insert instead of a carbide insert. I wonder if they'd ever wear out?

      You don't want to know how much I paid for my diamond wheel and diamond stone. Well, I'm sure gemstone quality would make it cost as much as my house instead of just as much as a (cheap) car payment for industrial diamond grinding tools.... Maybe its cheaper now? donno.

      Diamond wheel is the only reasonable way to sharpen carbide cutting tools. Word to wise do not cut plain steel with diamond... something about the carbon steel metallurgy makes the diamond break down fast and its a waste of money. Diamond being carbon can supposedly dissolve into low carbon steels so it wears extremely quickly.

      You know what would be cool, in a cheap diamond world? One of those dremel cutoff fiberglass wheels impregnated with industrial diamonds. That would probably be $30 to $50 now, but in a cheap diamond world could be as little as $5 each. You'd only buy one per lifetime, as long as you don't cut steel with it.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Diamonds are Carbon - Common as Dirt by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      The material holding the diamond wears out long before the diamond itself does. That's the actual tool life limit.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:Diamonds are Carbon - Common as Dirt by Formalin · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that small industrial diamonds, for grit and such, have been synthetic since the 50s... and fairly cheap.

      Think general electric came up with the process.

      Iron likes to eat carbon when it's hot - doesn't matter if it's coke or diamond.

    4. Re:Diamonds are Carbon - Common as Dirt by pnot · · Score: 1

      You're correct. GE and the USSR both started producing artificial diamonds decades ago. Most industrial diamonds are synthetic. The USSR was selling synthetic gem diamonds in the 70s -- see http://edwardjayepstein.com/diamond/chap17.htm .

    5. Re:Diamonds are Carbon - Common as Dirt by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      If you only have to buy one per lifetime, what's $30-50?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    6. Re:Diamonds are Carbon - Common as Dirt by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      There seem to be a few Dremel diamond wheels on Amazon.

  6. Not very usable, not very secret by Khyber · · Score: 2

    We've known about this for years. All the fucking diamonds are radioactive as hell.

    Graphite field + meteor impact = nuclear diamonds.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Not very usable, not very secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new nuclear diamond overlords.

    2. Re:Not very usable, not very secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are right that Popigai impact diamonds have been known for many years (paper from 1997 for example [PDF]). I don't understand what is new about this news article. There's nothing new there at all, and the Popigai diamonds are industrial diamonds, not the big, single crystals for jewelry. But what you say doesn't make any sense either, because graphite subjected to impact pressures and temperatures does not produce radioactivity.

    3. Re:Not very usable, not very secret by Khyber · · Score: 2

      You didn't know that Russian Diamonds are almost all radioactive, did you? That's one of the easiest ways to find out where the stone came from, is with a Geiger counter. If it sets it off, you're talking Russia/Ukraine/Slavic areas.

      And meteorite impacts are well-known for making areas slightly radioactive.

      That will likely make these diamonds good for industry, shit for optics.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Not very usable, not very secret by BluBrick · · Score: 2

      We've known about this for years. All the fucking diamonds are radioactive as hell.

      That's not too hard for deBeers to to spin. "Our New-Clear(TM) diamonds don't just give her a wonderfully radiant glow, they have a glow all of their own." Hell, they could even add a fifth "C" to the classic 4 - Cut, Clarity, Colour, Carat, and now Candlepower.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    5. Re:Not very usable, not very secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hard time envisaging a fucking diamond...

    6. Re:Not very usable, not very secret by airdweller · · Score: 1

      "You didn't know that Russian Diamonds are almost all radioactive, did you?"

      You didn't know that everything that existed was radioactive, did you?

  7. Has there ever been a more successful cartel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This makes me wonder if there has ever been a more successful cartel. The last time it was threatened was when they found them in Canada. Of course the Canadians knew better than to just let them out in a free market. Even if you're not in DeBeers, everybody understands that you have to release.... them... slowly...

    Show her you really care by spending outrageous cartel prices. Has to be one of the greatest scams in history.

    1. Re:Has there ever been a more successful cartel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Catholic church circa 1000AD?

    2. Re:Has there ever been a more successful cartel? by vlm · · Score: 1

      This makes me wonder if there has ever been a more successful cartel

      DeBeers annual revenue 6 billion per year per wikipedia

      OPEC 33 million barrels per day shipped at 100 bucks a barrel = 3.3 billion bucks per day or "about one and a quarter trillion" per year.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Has there ever been a more successful cartel? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I bet the guys in South America could top that.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Has there ever been a more successful cartel? by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      ..and I can fill up for (today's rate) $1.229 CDN/L. That price includes land leases, drilling, transport of raw material, processing into sellable product, redisdribution to buyers, transport to the local gas station, maintenance of all equipemnt, and lots of taxes. Also, everyone is taking a cut at every stage. It's still only $1.229/L.

      Its really amazing how cheap gas actually actually is.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  8. Resource curse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will help the Russian government stay corrupt even after they run out of oil.

  9. Obligatory by ZipprHead · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, diamonds find you.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

      LATE

  10. I don't get it... by xor.pt · · Score: 2

    So the USSR was financially strangled during the Cold War by low oil prices while at the same time they had these diamond deposits?

    1. Re:I don't get it... by NetCow · · Score: 1
    2. Re:I don't get it... by vlm · · Score: 1

      So the USSR was financially strangled during the Cold War by low oil prices while at the same time they had these diamond deposits?

      This was before the Canadians were shipping their rocks, so dumping diamonds on the market to implode the market would only piss off the south africans, who were on the west's sh!t list at the time for the whole apartheid thing. So if anything, dumping their diamonds would make "us" happy. Maybe not happy enough to give them oil out of the goodness of our hearts, but...

      I have no idea how to prove that the S.A. were not paying a bribe in metals to the russians to keep their diamonds off the market. That would have been the intelligent thing for them to demand. But even confiscating the entire production of S.A. isn't going to keep USSR afloat, so...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:I don't get it... by Khyber · · Score: 0

      Nobody wants radioactive diamonds. Especially from THAT area.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:I don't get it... by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      I am curious what kind of radiation they produce now.

      Are they alpha emitters? Gamma emitters? Beta emitters?

      Either alpha or beta emitters in a clear crystalline matrix could have interesting applications when coupled to rare-earth oxide layers, for instance.

      Not something you would wear around your neck, but something you CVD a layer of silicon onto, and etch a photocell on.

      If they are radioactive enough to be harmful, they are radioactive enough for passive power generation; assuming beta or alpha decay at least. Gamma decay would make them basically useless, except as reference signal sources for density meters.

      Where can I get more information on these diamonds?

    5. Re:I don't get it... by dtmos · · Score: 2

      Can you either:

      (a) explain how an impact can make something radioactive;
      (b) cite a source for your belief that these diamonds are radioactive; or
      (c) stop going on and on about it?

      Thank you.

    6. Re:I don't get it... by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      How an impact could produce radioactives is easy enough - our nuclear weapons still rely on mushing things together quickly enough to generate fission and/or fusion, and we're talking an asteroid impact here that was sufficiently massive and fast to leave a crater over sixty miles across - but I'd like to see actual citations also.

    7. Re:I don't get it... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      nuclear weapons still rely on mushing things together quickly enough to generate fission and/or fusion

      Yeah, if you "mash together" pure U235 or Plutonium you have nuclear fission. There's not really a lot of that in your average meteor. And fusion? forget about it.

    8. Re:I don't get it... by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      My napkin math (and a handy asteroid impact website) suggests 14.4 tons TNT yield equivalent KE per square centimetre for a 5km wide stony asteroid at a lazy 11km/sec.

      By comparison, wikipedia claims the 4MT Mk-21 thermonuclear bomb weighed in at only 6.8t with dimensions of 3.8m by 1.4m - what does that suggest to you?

    9. Re:I don't get it... by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, my napkin math has been rebutted. Apparently I may need to find another four orders of magnitude. :)

    10. Re:I don't get it... by swb · · Score: 1

      That's a crazy political analysis.

      Ivan always had plenty of oil at home and plenty available from client states like Iraq.

      South Africa was politically unpopular over apartheid, but more generally they were a solid anti-communist bulwark against the various Marxist movements in Southern Africa. Trying to squelch the SA economy by flooding diamond markets wouldn't really have made the US happy but would have made Ivan thrilled.

      Ivan could have flooded the diamond markets, but they benefited from De Beers' cartel-enforced high prices. They were probably selling them at a steep discount over the cartel prices, but were making more in hard currency than they would have trying to collapse the cartel or SA.

      Ivan also had some distribution problems -- the Hasidim have a ton of influence over the diamond markets, and Ivan and the sons of Abraham weren't known for their mutual love, hence the need for a deep discount to move stones through Antwerp, as you had to buy loyalty and cover the risks that your wholesaler could get discovered cheating the cartel and get cut off from the usual supply.

  11. Monopoly. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I recall reading that some time ago De Beers had conspired with GE to fix the price of industrial diamonds. I've also been told that synthetic diamonds can be produced with higher quality than most naturally occurring diamonds, but their manufacture is kept at a relative minimum to keep prices high. Although apparently De Beer's monopoly isn't what it used to be, not that it means an end to price fixing or other questionable practices.

  12. A diamong mine is forever by davidwr · · Score: 1

    as long as you keep it a secret.

    Cue "In Soviet Russia" in 3...2...1... dammit, too late!

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:A diamong mine is forever by styrotech · · Score: 1

      From a Russian diamond mine is forever with love?

      In Soviet Russia, with forever a diamond mine, love only gets you twice!

  13. Oblig by Yosho-sama · · Score: 1

    There's diamonds in them thar hills!

    --
    My kingdom for a donkey!
  14. The DeBeers strategy is twofold: by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Control supply and stimulate demand. The 'tradition' of a diamond engagement ring is a DeBeers invention that dates to the twenties. Also DeBeers subsidizes advertising. Jewelers can get money from DeBeers to help them place ads provided they stick to certain themes. DeBeers will even supply stock art. Something else few people realize. DeBeers is heavily invested in gold production. They own controlling interest in a lot of mines. So it is not only diamonds that have been manipulated, but gold as well. Same deal: stimulate demand with subsidized ads and control supply. Gold is not as well controlled as are diamonds, but a review of the recent price trend gives a clue. Watch what happens to gold when the world economy goes back on the boil. It may be a while, but trust me. The people who cornered this market will clean TF up.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  15. Popigai crater: Origin and distribution of diamond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    A peer reviewed paper describing the occurrence is here (paywalled):
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01639.x/abstract
    The diamonds are ~0.2-0.5mm, elongate or tabular layered grains. They are sometimes colorless but often are yellow, grey, or black. Rarely there are diamonds which reach 10mm found in the alluvial gravel.

    If the deposit is as rich as the article claims it looks like an excellent source for industrial diamonds, although given how fractured they are it won't change the gem diamond market much.

  16. gas prices go down... by takiysobi · · Score: 1

    ...and suddenly Putin decides he wants to deal in diamonds.

  17. Diamonds, like paper by oGMo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah it's almost like someone decided to put a funny pattern on some paper, cut it up into small rectangles, and declare it worth something. Can you imagine people accepting something like that?! A completely artificially-restricted supply of controlled by one organization! What next, they arrest people who try and print their own!?

    In seriousness, there is no value beyond consensus. Gold is not any more intrinsically valuable than diamonds (or fiat currency!); people simply agree to trade a certain amount of one thing (paper, bank balance, etc) for it. This is why people pay for BitCoins (and other virtual goods), why currency fluctuates, and in essence, how the economy works.

    (The malleability of gold and other arguments of function are entirely irrelevant; people always agree on value for some reason, from "I have too much money and I felt like it," to "I need it for my research." Reason is a constant, and one reason is not inherently better or more valid than another.)

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Diamonds, like paper by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's almost like someone decided to put a funny pattern on some paper

      Almost, but actually not.

      If diamonds were the foundation of our currency then it would make sense to restrict the supply. Currencies must of necessity be scarce or they become worthless, and in the case of paper that scarcity must of necessity be artificial. That it is artificial and thus allows for overprinting and the resultant devaluation is why many (myself not among them) would much prefer a gold-backed currency. They choose gold as opposed to, say, diamonds, because gold represents actual scarcity and thus makes it extremely unlikely that any entity could flood the market and drop the bottom out of the price.

      Controlling and limiting the supply of currency helps everyone participating in the economy.

      Limiting the supply of diamonds only helps those participating in the scam.

      Of course price is only a matter of consensus blah blah blah everything is the same so let's not distinguish...

      Except what do you think would actually happen if DeBeer's got hit in the metaphorical head and unleashed the floodgates, or Russia started exploiting this diamond source to its maximum potential, or anything else happened to change the availability of diamonds to reflect their true scarcity?

      Yeah, virtually nobody would agree to pay the prices currently being asked. The only reason anyone does is because of the artificial scarcity (which relatively few even know is artificial).

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Diamonds, like paper by digitect · · Score: 2

      Gold is not any more intrinsically valuable than diamonds (or fiat currency!)

      Not true. Gold is a fabulous conductor and does not corrode. That makes it extremely valuable in electrical components, particularly connectors. If we could assemble all electronics with gold plated connectors the world would have a lot less shorts, fires, computer failures, etc.

      Two intrinsically interesting characteristics of diamonds are hardness and thermal conductivity.

      Can't say the same for fiat currency.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    3. Re:Diamonds, like paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is a fabulous conductor and does not corrode.

      Close. Sure gold conducts, and does not oxidize. However, silver conducts better, but unfortunately for electronics it suffers from oxidization.

      "Gold never loses its luster."

    4. Re:Diamonds, like paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is much more heavily used in jewelry and a lot of it is sitting in vaults unused, so non-aesthetic/hoarding uses don't drive its price. In applications, plating is generally sufficient to take advantage of its useful properties and that only takes very small quantities as compared to copper which is used in bulk.

    5. Re:Diamonds, like paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is a fabulous conductor and does not corrode.

      Oh absolutely it does corrode. Swimming teachers & coaches avoid gold wedding rings for this reason - the chlorinated water eats gold.

      Tungsten carbide is a common favourite instead.

      Citation: married to a swimming coach.

    6. Re:Diamonds, like paper by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      For the sake of argument, let's accept the idea that gold and paper both have no inherent value. It's still a better idea to restrict your government to using something like gold for legal tender money because it's impossible for that government to devalue everybody else's holdings of that currency by simply running the printing presses. That's why it's a shame that so few media outlets explain the stealth tax aspect of quantatative easing, twist, etc. or tie it to the price of food, gas, hard goods, etc.

      What people use as a currency should be entirely between them, be it gold, FRN's, silver, shells, Amex, apples, Visa, Bitcoin, in-game credits, or tulip bulbs. Forcing any of those choices on a group of people who live in a particular geographic area is against reason and humanity.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Diamonds, like paper by Prune · · Score: 1

      > Currencies must of necessity be scarce or they become worthless

      It's a little different with fiat currencies, where the primary impetus for using the currency is that one can only pay taxes in that very currency (this is an important topic in Modern Monetary Theory).

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    8. Re:Diamonds, like paper by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      There is one huge difference between gold and diamonds... Supply of gold is naturally limited by it's availability, where as supply of diamonds is artificially limited by the DeBeers company. The value is propped up by those limitations, and by a marketing campaign to convince people that a diamond actually has intrinsic value.

      If a way to mine 10x the quantity of goals was suddenly discovered, the price of gold would fall. On the other hand, many many times the amount of diamonds available on the market have already been discovered, and artificial limitations are simply in place.

      Paper money is totally different. Everyone understands and agrees that the paper has no intrinsic value, but faith is placed in the issuer to properly control supply. The difference between diamonds and cash is relative transparency - we know what's going on with our money... As this article proves, we don't really know what's going on with Diamonds.

      Even bigger difference between Diamonds and cash: If I trade an object with real value, such as a loaf of bread for cash at market price, I can be pretty confident that I could buy another loaf of bread for the same price. If you buy a $3000 diamond at retail, how much would you expect to be able to sell it for? (Hint... With all the cash4gold places floating around... How many cash4diamond shops do you see?)

    9. Re:Diamonds, like paper by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If we could assemble all electronics with gold plated connectors the world would have a lot less shorts, fires, computer failures, etc.

      Hmmm, almost completely the opposite of my experience.

      Just how is introducing a better conductor where a conductor SHOULD be is going to prevent a short circuit ( the presence of a low resistance path between points which should have an extremely high resistance between them - up to the breakdown electric field of the dielectric medium)?

      Electrical fires, the ones that I've had to put out (and on occasions, have started myself, by abusing equipment shamelessly) are generally the result of deliberate or accidental abuse of the equipment, leading to excessive current draw and then overheating of the flex leading to the equipment. THAT is why every electrical circuit on installed to our standards (I don't know where you are, or what standards your electricians are meant to work to) has a fuse or circuit breaker installed on it. The fuse (or circuit breaker) is NOT there to protect the equipment ; it's purpose is to stop the cable overheating (both the flexible consumer cable for portable equipment, and the cabling within walls). I have seen one fire trying to start (I found the circuit breaker and killed the circuit before it got going) at a connector, but on examination the pin of the plug hadn't been tightened up sufficiently, had worked loose, and the cable was in intermittent contact with the pin ; gold plating wouldn't have helped that, I'm afraid - it needed competent installation. (That circuit breaker was a non-RCD 50A breaker feeding a cable rated for 26A and a 40A shower ; the amateur electrician who wired up that hotel extension was a dangerous idiot who did not understand what the fuck he was doing. He'd also installed his own gas heater, and I'm pretty sure it was giving us carbon monoxide poisoning. We moved the fuck out that evening, and reported the twat to the local fire department.)

      Computer failures .... well, you might be on better ground here. Most of my wiring work (a dozen instrumentation cabins reading around 100 sensors apiece, plus maintenance of same, most circuits being in normally-explosive atmospheres) has been with analogue signals (1-10V 4-wire and 4-20mA loops mostly) and some digital signals (up to a few hundred hertz), and there, appropriate use of good quality connectors does save a ship-load of hassle, by reducing contact noise. Inside a computer ... well I've built enough industrial computers to have no illusion about the importance of clamping your connectors down, tight, locking your cards into the cages. If you don't, you are going to get trouble you don't need. But once you've done that ... gold plating isn't going to make a huge difference. Silver would be better, conduction wise, and soft enough that the contacts will be good. Any competent instrument technician cleans contacts before making them up, so who gives a shit about corrosion? It's a piece of marketing bullshit.

      There are perfectly good reasons for gold-plating - principally to reduce contact noise in analogue circuits and I'd include it for frequently-operated contacts (keyboard switches, limit switches, position indicating switches). But the reasons you cite are not good reasons for specifying gold-plating over competent installation. A gold-plated death-trap remains a death trap.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  18. Quick, invade them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are obviously planing to build a weapon of mass destruction satellite with it!

  19. Does the Mohs scale now go to 11? by es330td · · Score: 3, Funny

    Forgive my ignorance but I thought diamond was a defined crystal lattice structure. How can it be "twice as hard" if it is a diamond? Is this another naturally occurring state of carbon that should be called something else?

    1. Re:Does the Mohs scale now go to 11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are impurities (inclusions) in all diamonds. This affects hardness.

    2. Re:Does the Mohs scale now go to 11? by puddingebola · · Score: 1

      "Why don't you just make 10 harder?" "These go to 11."

    3. Re:Does the Mohs scale now go to 11? by artor3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is this another naturally occurring state of carbon that should be called something else?

      Yes.

    4. Re:Does the Mohs scale now go to 11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diamonds are made up of super-closely packed molecules of marketing.

  20. Not unlike the Washington Monument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Washington Monument was supposed to be capped with the world's most expensive metal -- aluminum. Perhaps diamonds will go the same way as aluminum did and become proliffic. Overheard in the not too distant future: "That Cubic Zirconia looks so good on you, it looks so much better than those diamonds, they're _everywhere_!"

  21. So what happens now? by future+assassin · · Score: 1
    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  22. Not surprising by catchblue22 · · Score: 2

    There are diamond reserves in the older regions of Africa and North America. It is not surprising that there are diamonds in the centre of Asia as well. The geology is similar. Basically what you need is an area with very old rock that hasn't been hugely disturbed by geological processes. The Canadian Shield contains 3 to 4 billion year old rock, and I believe there are also areas with similar rocks in both central Africa and central Asia. Diamonds can be found in areas with rocks with ages more than 2.5 billion years. I think this is because the kimberlite pipes that bring them to the surface only happened that long ago, though I'm not absolutely sure of this. Once deposited by those pipes, the diamonds remain at or near the surface, where they can be mined.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  23. Goodbye DeBeers by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

    Your monopoly is gone. New monopolists such as Monsanto and MPIAA are taking over.

    1. Re:Goodbye DeBeers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DeBeers entered into a mineral agreement with Russia in 1992 giving them right of first refusal for all diamonds mined in Russia.

  24. If you can easily shape it, maybe by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    I have no idea these days, but last time I spec'd out the purchase of carbide cutting inserts they weren't much more than $5 when sintered into your desired shape in bulk. Wouldn't the diamonds burn up pretty easily?

  25. know what's hot? by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    Fiancees who reject the diamond industry!

    Yay for rejecting the marketing that every engagement needs a big sparkly rock!

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:know what's hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay. Then we can go back to needing more gold and all those other gems than the next guy! Or revert to who owns the most land. Or.... hold on. Are we Anglos the only people where the man has to pay to get married? Don't our left defined non white "betters" gets paid by the woman?

    2. Re:know what's hot? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      no, asians take it to the next level. diamond is order of magnitude cheaper than asian dowry

    3. Re:know what's hot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not use a combination of "who makes me happy", "who treats me well" and "who I find attractive" appropriately weighted according to your personal preference?

  26. What can it mean!? by iroll · · Score: 1

    This just makes me even more curious about why the geological community is covering up the obvious impact crater in Tennessee!

    http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/08/28/2217237/tennessee-crater-inches-toward-recognition

    --
    Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    1. Re:What can it mean!? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I'm curious as to why you think that article points to a "cover up"?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  27. Udachny by udachny · · Score: 1

    Back in the eighties I spent 6 years in Udachny (see the nick?) What are and were near 20,000 people doing so far north? Why was there an underground nuclear explosion there? Diamonds. For the longest time that place supplied 80% of Soviet and then Russian diamonds. Udachny is the deepest open diamond mine at 610 meters. The largest diamond in Russia was found there on the 23 of December 1980. It was 48x36x25 mm, at 342.5ct, it was very clear, yellow stone.

      Some pictures.

    Russia is full of diamonds, but mostly they are small, used to make drill bits, parts of machines.

    1. Re:Udachny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you meet ayn rand while you were there ?

    2. Re:Udachny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I found your mother, the yeti, and I let my dogs fuck her.

  28. WOW, and I am planning to move to Russia by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    I was planning to move to Russia and marry a babushka and start a goat farm,

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:WOW, and I am planning to move to Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was planning to move to Russia and marry a babushka...

      Good for you! Most guys wouldn't be comfortable openly admitting to a predilection for GILFs.

      - T

  29. This doesn't seem to be new news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Searching on the web I found a number of references to Popigai including a PDF report (http://geology.mines.edu/faculty/Klee/Popigai.pdf) dating back to 2004 from the Colorado school of Mines. If it were to have such a great impact on the prices of diamonds for consumers I'm guessing it would have happened a long time ago. Of course time will tell.

  30. Not completely artificial by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    Diamonds are very common. However, large carat diamonds are not. Very large diamonds are indeed quite rare. As well as the fancy color diamonds. Red diamonds being quite rare indeed. Why people are willing to pay so much for plain old white diamonds is a mystery to me. Certainly flawless diamonds are more rare, but considering DeBeers, et al are sitting on the motherlode of them, it's hard to know just how much more rare they are, if at all.

    1. Re:Not completely artificial by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But the vast majority of the diamond market is through controlling quantity, most are white diamonds. There have been marketing pushes for large carats at times, other times the marketing has been to smaller Russian diamonds, at other times for "investment" diamonds. Both the supply and demand are being carefully controlled. You can not resell diamond jewelry for anything near the purchase price and even at a loss reselling is difficult. People are conditioned to never sell them anyway and giving your fiancee your grandmother's diamond ring for engagement is often looked down on.

      The market for very large carat and relatively flawless diamonds is somewhat small. Russian diamonds for the most part are tiny, under one carat. Don't know about these new deposits though. However if they turn out to be larger carats you can be sure that Russia won't break with De Beers and flood the market with them, since everyone is very concerned with keeping the prices artificially high.

  31. Oblig by shiftless · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia....diamonds buy you.

  32. Re:Popigai crater: Origin and distribution of diam by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    But the thing is, you only need like .00001% of them to be gem quality to have a shit load of gem quality diamonds.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  33. You were never in the Gulag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Soviets discovered the bonanza back in the 1970s

    The USSR was selling synthetic gem diamonds in the 70s

    In soviet Russia, synthetic diamond comes from big crater in the ground.

  34. Fiancée fluctuating price point by docilespelunker · · Score: 1

    This potentially devalues my fiancée. Negative equity on the house and fiancée, ho hum

  35. Not worthless, just worth less by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Diamonds used to sell for around $8000 for a 1 Ct stone in 1995 and now it sells for about $3000. So if you happen to be the proud owner of a stone bought 20 years ago, then you may be unhappy with the price, but the stone is still the same, whereas a car bought for $8000 in 1995...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  36. Um, no. by dtmos · · Score: 1

    Nuclear weapons do not "rely on mushing things together quickly enough to generate fission." Nuclear weapons take material that is already fissioning at a very low rate -- or on the edge of doing so, and can be made to do so by the addition of the appropriate neutron source -- and "mushes it together" fast enough and dense enough that the resulting chain reaction occurs very rapidly, creating an explosion instead of just a general warming of the material.

    The "mushing" is what creates the explosion, not what creates the fission. The fission is a property of the material itself, which is why the international control of fissionable material -- primarily plutonium and enriched uranium -- is sufficient to control the spread of nuclear weapons (in theory). Nuclear arms control is not done by controlling "things that mush."

    1. Re:Um, no. by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that so-called "hydrogen bombs" typically rely on three+ stages: a conventional KE explosive component (stage 1) to force an explosive fission chain reaction in a sub-critical heavy-element component (stage 2), which in turn is used to force an explosive fusion chain reaction in a light-element component (stage 3), which is used to further boost the efficiency of the fissioning component. More or less.

      A multiple-kilometers-wide iron-nickel asteroid impacting a solid planet at multiple-kilometres-per-second speed? I was imagining that was in the ballpark, but alright:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popigai_Astroblem - "either an 8 km (5.0 mi) diameter chondrite asteroid, or a 5 km (3.1 mi) diameter stony asteroid"
      http://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ - "Welcome to the Earth Impact Effects Program"

      We'll start with the most conservative choice: a 5 km stony asteroid travelling at a minimal 11 km/s. KE before atmospheric entry is 1.19 x 10^22 Joules = 2.84 x 10^6 MegaTons TNT. So almost three billion megatons of "conventional" force. Mind you, that results in an estimated crater only 33.6km across rather than the 90km of the actual Popigai crater.

      Now, that's spread over a significant surface area, which (we'll wildly assume) is a circle: pi*r*r, or about 19634954 m^2. So a "mere" 14.4 tons of TNT per square centimetre. Is that enough for fission or fusion reactions in materials "caught in the middle" to occur? Given wikipedia lists the 4MT Mk-21 as weighing 6.8t and being 3.8m by 1.4m, I'd guess easily enough for fission and even for fusion too.

      Please feel free to correct me, this is totally napkin math. :)

    2. Re:Um, no. by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

      Napkin math wrong. By your logic, a large enough chemical explosion or volcanic explosion, the latter of which can dwarf any nuke in "megaton yield", should create massive amounts of radiation.

      But they don't. Your meteor impact would have to raise a significant mass of normally non-fissionable material to a high enough temperature to have nuclear reactions.

      I just looked up the temperature required for D-D fusion. 40 x 10^7 K. Your 5km stony asteroid weighs maybe 5e17 grams--and, per you, has 1e22 J of energy. Put all that energy into heating the asteroid (it won't all go there) and you get to order of 20k K, which is nowhere near hot enough for nuclear reactions, even if you drop the "40" on the DD fusion energy temperature.

      Find me another 4 orders of magnitude of temperature in your meteor impact and maybe I'll credit your impact radiation theory.

      --PM

    3. Re:Um, no. by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Thankyou for demolishing my napkin. :)

      A question (if you've the time to spare). I imagine the "delivered" KE of the asteroid wouldn't be evenly distributed; rather it'd be highest at or near the centre of impact between the asteroid and the earth. On the other hand, as you point out, it won't all go into compressing/heating our rather conveniently placed blob of deuterium at ground zero. Can this sort of thing still be worked out with napkin math, and would it get much closer to the extra four orders of magnitude needed for a 'maybe'?

      P.S. I assumed a density of 3000kg/m^3 (taken from the website); at 4/3*pi*r^3*d that's just under 2e17 grams. You were generous to me. :)

    4. Re:Um, no. by dtmos · · Score: 1

      You may find Richard Rhodes' Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb interesting. It discusses a lot of detail in various hydrogen bomb designs, and why things are as they (possibly) are. (The technical points all seem to be internally consistent but, other than that, I have no way of verifying the accuracy of the book. Still, it's a great geek read.) Even the Wikipedia entry is enlightening.

      One point is that it's tough to get deuterium hot enough to fuse, without having the energy radiate away as just a bright X-ray source, cooling things back off. (Turning a liability into an asset -- using pressure from the radiation of the fission first stage to compress and ignite the fusion second stage -- is supposed to be one of the key ideas of the Bomb.)

  37. My Future Wife by Westwood0720 · · Score: 1

    My future wife tells me that she wants a nice ring. I mean hell, if I need to spend $3000 on her for a ring, I can do that. I love her. I mean, for some reason I need to have a nicely built PC that most people think is useless. We all have our niches. If she wants to wear a shiny piece of rock on her finger, then I can handle that. She makes me happy, and I want to make her as equally happy.

  38. say what now? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    You mean supply of diamonds could effect their prices? But according to the Communist economic theory it's the labor that goes into producing the goods that acts as the deciding factor on the prices. Don't we all know now that "hard working" is the same as "most useful"? Oh, wait, that's not a Soviet mantra... anymore. Everything new is a well-forgotten old.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  39. Makers of synthetic diamonds by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

    Right here, sir. This group bought the crystal reactors (and presumably also hired personnel) from the previous corporation that went bankrupt trying to make and sell synthesized diamonds. You can even buy stock in the company.

    http://www.sciodiamond.com/

  40. Forget something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot at least two things:

    • You did not mention that you are a roman_mir sock puppet (how many are there, any ways?)
    • You forgot to remind us that anyone who does not convert to your religion is doomed to eternal suffering.

    Otherwise, you almost wrote a mostly accurate and factual comment, roman_mir.

  41. Diamonds Are A Lousy Investment by assertation · · Score: 1

    I want to chime in like others on this point.

    I was surprised a few months ago to find out that diamonds are NOT valuable. Diamonds, even natural ones, are not rare. Diamonds are in plentiful supply and the price is kept Artificially HIGH by the DeBeers family who buys up or otherwise controls the excess.

    When you buy that engagement ring, you may be showing your fiance that you are willing to sacrifice a large portion of your savings to give her a conventional symbol for the extent of your love..........but you aren't giving her anything value.

  42. and don't forget sapphires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sapphire never wears and can be colourless so they're useful for things that require durability such as ..say a camera lens!

    It was also mentioned in a previous /. article for being arguably the best material for data storage with practically infinite lifespan.

  43. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends on YOU. Don't date shitty girls.

  44. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how it works. Lure the women and the men will follow. It's women they target.

  45. Obligatory Yakov Smirnoff reference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia diamond buys you?

  46. Man made have been around for a while now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apollo Diamond, Inc., in Boston. They make diamonds so good that the only way DeBeersRacketeers can tell that they are man made is because they are too perfect. No flaws at all.

    1. Re:Man made have been around for a while now by lpq · · Score: 1

      That's the main reason why DeBeerRacketeers now put serial numbers on each diamond. "Real"[sic] diamonds will have serial numbers on them to allow tracing and guarantees of being "real"...

      Wouldn't it be cool if diamond fell to the price level of any other earth mineral, like iron, or whatever..... I wonder if they could make diamond glasses that would never scratch (for example), or faces for some devices portable devices so scratching doesn't render a screen useless over time.

  47. the perversity of reliable signals by epine · · Score: 1

    Women want to know that men aren't just in it for the action. Cash would make a nice signal of male intent, but from the male side, it's too darn fungible. The man wants to make sure the women isn't in it just to reap the reliable signal.

    Enter the diamond: expensive to buy (reliable signal to women), lousy to resell (putting the men more at ease), and a nice racket for the middlemen, who supply the tsunami of romantic propaganda to wrap the whole ridiculous spectacle in broad public approval.

  48. Diamonds are just Shiny Coal by pebear · · Score: 1

    They are just shiny coal, what's the big deal. They even burn like coal. Waste of money. I guess De-Beers will have an increasing amount of trouble keeping a lid on the diamond market sooner or later.

    --
    Paul E. Bahre
  49. Great for them!!! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I am glad to hear it, I have always thought that the blood diamond problem in Africa was something that could be avoided if we saturated the market with enough diamonds to bring the price way down...and now we have trillions of carots! SO bring it all out at once, saturate the market and become worthless....and
    you will see no more diamonds coming out of africa....

    Now will this ever happen, probably not, because I am sure some people will try their best to not let this happen....but if it was the Chinese, you think they would care about that.....they would bring out as much as possible and sell the stuff overnight if they could...bringing about a market crash for anyone who has stocks in diamonds...