Eventually those problem will be fixable. So it might suck for a couple of decades, but once they are fixed you're good to go. Once you are dead, well then that's it. No changing your mind.
"- growing up micromanaged by your parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, great-great grandparents...ad infinitum. Or at least, ad nauseam." what an odd thing. I don't think that's rea;;y a practical problem. You cna only have so many people managining something.
"- financial system has to be completely reworked." Some would, most wouldn't need to be. The problems you list would probably be a driver for better robotics.
"- Speaking of culture, it would never change." Of course it would.
Long term? I would set my goal on space travel. There is a lot of hard and interesting work in both the technical and public arena to keep one busy for a long while. And when you are done, you will have someplace truly new to go to.
As a software developer, I have to disagree. I love the wide screens. I assume by 'real work' you mean you edit 1 pdf at a time, otherwise you complaint is just whiny GOMLism.
Code is getting a lot more complex. When it's 4 people putting a game together? then you can stick an Easter egg and all laugh about it. when its 20 developers, 12 QA people, and a few million lines of code? it because an addition thing to manage.
TO answer your question: I often out Easter eggs in my code, but I do most my work on my own. Also, jokes.
Not really. IT's more complecated then that, but you wold actually need to be able to read above a 5th grade level to understand the writing of our fore fathers.
This, again? Do you even read anything on this topic? You're post, and many like it have been shot to hell over and over again. Why do you keep posting this crap they doesn't nothing more then let everyone know who you are wallowing in ignorance.
And the most cited 'study' just said, well there were 12000 deaths, so about 25% of that was cell phone related. They just pulled the number out of the air.
Its not nonsense. It's the most reasonably way to do it. You can't have a special number for everyone. Don't get me wrong, you will always be a number 2 to me~
As for you're example..neither,. The 300 pound man with a.08 is just as dangerous. Something that has been shown over an over again.
AS has been shown, many times now, someone asking you to super size will often get a reflexive yes. DO you know why supersize was created? Because there had been a stigma with asking for a large. SO a marketing firm was hired and they came up with a way to move more food.
So portion size increased, a lot, and people are buying the supersize.
No it wan't impossible, but it had been frowned upon. Look up David Wallerstein.
Burgers are no almost 5 times in size to what they where in 1950. when you have generation of people taught to 'eat all the food on your plate.' they take that with them whenever they eat. People have been trained to eat until it's all gone, not eat until you are full.
Did you know before about 1950, most people ate toast and coffee for breakfast? this 'farmers breakfast' concept was also a marketing gimmick to sell bacon.
And weight is FINE for talking about an object on a relativity gravitational object. Earth weight would just be stupid. Let me know when we colonize other planets, or have morbidly obese people in space.
"This toned me up a great deal but made zero difference to my mass." The you must of increased you intake.
Slashdot Mirror
Eventually those problem will be fixable. So it might suck for a couple of decades, but once they are fixed you're good to go. Once you are dead, well then that's it. No changing your mind.
"- growing up micromanaged by your parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, great-great grandparents...ad infinitum. Or at least, ad nauseam."
what an odd thing. I don't think that's rea;;y a practical problem. You cna only have so many people managining something.
"- financial system has to be completely reworked." Some would, most wouldn't need to be.
The problems you list would probably be a driver for better robotics.
"- Speaking of culture, it would never change."
Of course it would.
Long term? I would set my goal on space travel.
There is a lot of hard and interesting work in both the technical and public arena to keep one busy for a long while. And when you are done, you will have someplace truly new to go to.
Then how do you explain the increase in life expectancy when the numbers compared start at age 5?
Please make another attempt to understand evolution.
Forever.
Other then that, as long as possible. Please resuscitate, don't pull the plug.
As a software developer, I have to disagree.
I love the wide screens. I assume by 'real work' you mean you edit 1 pdf at a time, otherwise you complaint is just whiny GOMLism.
Backdoor and easter eggs are different things, and they have both always been around as long as computers have been around.
Code is getting a lot more complex. When it's 4 people putting a game together? then you can stick an Easter egg and all laugh about it. when its 20 developers, 12 QA people, and a few million lines of code? it because an addition thing to manage.
TO answer your question:
I often out Easter eggs in my code, but I do most my work on my own.
Also, jokes.
"cuntrag "
That statement make many women uncomfortable. Just thought you might want to know.
Not really. IT's more complecated then that, but you wold actually need to be able to read above a 5th grade level to understand the writing of our fore fathers.
no they haven't. You are stupid or a liar.
Taxes shot up, sheesh. Blaming the the guy fighting to let you keep the tax breaks for tax increases? not THAT"S rich.
no it is not rich. Just because it isn't dirt pore doesn't mean it's rich.
Of course, the person is just making up lies about Obama.; which is the only the the pubs have anymore.
"because white people are annoying."
No bigotry here.
No, they aren't synonymy. If you are using retarded to mean dumb, then you are stupid.
In case of fire, wold you use a fire retardant, for a fire dumbener?
This, again?
Do you even read anything on this topic? You're post, and many like it have been shot to hell over and over again.
Why do you keep posting this crap they doesn't nothing more then let everyone know who you are wallowing in ignorance.
If only someone would put some sort of punctuation suggest in their sig to denote this kind of stuff~
WRONG. There was NEVER consensus as to the cooling. Not ever. In fact, it was never more then a tiny percent of climatologist.
If only there was actual scientific evidence that its a problem.
Here is some emperical evidence that it is not a problem:
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s1103.pdf
We would expect to see an increase in accidents, but we see a decrease since 1990
And the most cited 'study' just said, well there were 12000 deaths, so about 25% of that was cell phone related. They just pulled the number out of the air.
Its not nonsense. It's the most reasonably way to do it. You can't have a special number for everyone.
Don't get me wrong, you will always be a number 2 to me~
As for you're example..neither,. The 300 pound man with a .08 is just as dangerous. Something that has been shown over an over again.
AS has been shown, many times now, someone asking you to super size will often get a reflexive yes.
DO you know why supersize was created? Because there had been a stigma with asking for a large. SO a marketing firm was hired and they came up with a way to move more food.
So portion size increased, a lot, and people are buying the supersize.
No it wan't impossible, but it had been frowned upon. Look up David Wallerstein.
Burgers are no almost 5 times in size to what they where in 1950. when you have generation of people taught to 'eat all the food on your plate.' they take that with them whenever they eat. People have been trained to eat until it's all gone, not eat until you are full.
Did you know before about 1950, most people ate toast and coffee for breakfast? this 'farmers breakfast' concept was also a marketing gimmick to sell bacon.
Yes, he was using corn syrup, but that horrid study he linked to was HFCS.
And there is no evidence that HFCS is any worse the sugar. And like all sugars, it should be avoided.
It's just as artificial as their conclusions.
Such a bad "study"
.
There is no evidence corn syrup is and different the sugar.
That Princeton study that everyone keeps point to is seriously flawed.
And natural news isn't worth shit, scientifically.
Oh, and Corn syrup is sweeter then sugar, so less is used then sugar.
I would suspect ALL SUGARS AND FATS before antibiotics.
Burn more then you eat.
And weight is FINE for talking about an object on a relativity gravitational object. Earth weight would just be stupid. Let me know when we colonize other planets, or have morbidly obese people in space.
"This toned me up a great deal but made zero difference to my mass."
The you must of increased you intake.