It wasn't a fuck up. They had unexpected result. The ran the tests thousands of times They said, this really should be right, but if it is it is huge. They showed there data and experiments to the scientific community Someone found a=n error..no that wasn't it. Someone found another error, ah, there's the reason.
"l vote for the Republican nominee this year. " Why the hell would anyone do that? His economic position have never, not once, gotten any country in our situation economically better. The economy has improved a lot with Obama policy's. Economically they have worked to get countries in similar situation out of it.
" he should not buy an ocean front mansion " Why not? please, what great logical leap have you come to the means an increase in ocean sea levels over the next 100years means you can't buy a home on the sea now?
"nothing wrong with people having different beliefs." ther is when one is provably wrong and those people want to shove it down peoples throats.
" Religious freedom is what our great country was built on." Yes, to keep you fuck twads from infecting other people. It was built to escape religious oppression. Something Catholics, and many other religious groups are trying to create. Yes, FORCING people into your belief system is oppression.
Keep your damn 'beliefs' to yourself and we don't have a problem. Present them as fact, and then make shit up to support them when they are shown to be wrong is a problem. Ironically, one of the drivers in create this country was fear of Catholics. Because catholics where the worst at abusing people then.
"Higgs boson will not put a dent in Creationism" of course not, it's an irrational belief, so even another ton of evidences it's wrong won't change their minds. Their minds where closed a long time ago
He showed the results of scientific studies. Of course he didn't show you 'science'.
" If AGW ever does turn out to be true"
It has turned out to be true. IN the field of study, it is NOT controversial. In fact, it's so solid the heartland institute has turned to intentional attacking the classroom.
Al Gore isn't a climatologist, he isn't an expert, and if it was smart enough to put himself in position to make money from scientific facts, then so what?
You are just using a verbose ad hom attack. No different then idiots who called the theory of evolution 'Darwinism'
That map show sea levels. In high tide of low tide, not storms, not erosion, etc... What happened when level five hurricanes start hitting land happening monthly?
If the world was static, and the oceans still, then the map is what you would get.
It also doesn't take into account erosion.
That said, no one is really talking about a 'water world' The idea is stupid on the face of it. But most people are talking about planning for future development of houses, cities ports, inward migration.
This is why deniers drive me batty. They are making it hard to make policy changes. They talk about nonsense such as 'bigger government' What we need is policy, at this point. wait longer then, yes, the government will need to spend a lot more money. Act now.
We should start implementing policy and code. Cities and the federal government need to thinking decades, not years. And 1ft is the mid level, not the high level, and disregards storms, storm surges and other melts.
"from Florida to the middle of North Carolina will be an uninhabited, u" so we should fence them off now, make a note of everyone who thinking Man Made Global Warming is a 'controversy' and it isn't real, and never let them out.? ok.
" I would guess the jury's out on that one," no, it isn't. It's safe. The only people saying it isn't is dimwits and people looking to create a fake "controversy"
Slashdot Mirror
It wasn't a fuck up.
They had unexpected result.
The ran the tests thousands of times
They said, this really should be right, but if it is it is huge.
They showed there data and experiments to the scientific community
Someone found a=n error..no that wasn't it.
Someone found another error, ah, there's the reason.
No fuck up, just science.
Oh, well politicians chastised the scientist, clearly there's a problem and not a political move to come up with something.
So, they where chastised? bottom line, there data and interpretation was fine. It was a media created circus, nothing more.
"l vote for the Republican nominee this year. "
Why the hell would anyone do that?
His economic position have never, not once, gotten any country in our situation economically better.
The economy has improved a lot with Obama policy's. Economically they have worked to get countries in similar situation out of it.
" he should not buy an ocean front mansion "
Why not? please, what great logical leap have you come to the means an increase in ocean sea levels over the next 100years means you can't buy a home on the sea now?
"nothing wrong with people having different beliefs."
ther is when one is provably wrong and those people want to shove it down peoples throats.
" Religious freedom is what our great country was built on."
Yes, to keep you fuck twads from infecting other people. It was built to escape religious oppression. Something Catholics, and many other religious groups are trying to create. Yes, FORCING people into your belief system is oppression.
Keep your damn 'beliefs' to yourself and we don't have a problem. Present them as fact, and then make shit up to support them when they are shown to be wrong is a problem.
Ironically, one of the drivers in create this country was fear of Catholics. Because catholics where the worst at abusing people then.
"Higgs boson will not put a dent in Creationism"
of course not, it's an irrational belief, so even another ton of evidences it's wrong won't change their minds. Their minds where closed a long time ago
and?
20 m rise in a 100 years doesn't mean a condo at sea level today is bad.
Not that Al Gore attacks have any bearing on the science.
Well, sometime the crack pottery comes later in their life.
In short:
Someone got one and I didn't like it, so now I hate them!
I hear the argument from pretty much every 11 year old.
He showed the results of scientific studies. Of course he didn't show you 'science'.
" If AGW ever does turn out to be true"
It has turned out to be true. IN the field of study, it is NOT controversial. In fact, it's so solid the heartland institute has turned to intentional attacking the classroom.
Al Gore isn't a climatologist, he isn't an expert, and if it was smart enough to put himself in position to make money from scientific facts, then so what?
You are just using a verbose ad hom attack. No different then idiots who called the theory of evolution 'Darwinism'
SO you are saying that the standard model seems correct because just by sheer coincident collider create the predicted particles?
Also, if what you say is true we wouldn't find unexpected particles; which have been found.
That map show sea levels. In high tide of low tide, not storms, not erosion, etc... What happened when level five hurricanes start hitting land happening monthly?
If the world was static, and the oceans still, then the map is what you would get.
It also doesn't take into account erosion.
That said, no one is really talking about a 'water world' The idea is stupid on the face of it.
But most people are talking about planning for future development of houses, cities ports, inward migration.
This is why deniers drive me batty. They are making it hard to make policy changes. They talk about nonsense such as 'bigger government' What we need is policy, at this point. wait longer then, yes, the government will need to spend a lot more money. Act now.
reverse? no. Slow down? yes.
Until they are gone.
God sais he wouldn't send a flood, be we still get floods. Ergo, god doesn't exist.
depend on where you are located. Also, Coal power is easier to control the individual cars.
no, it isn't. It doesn't allow for any realistic planning. You need models because they are making decisions that will effect future generation.
We should start implementing policy and code. Cities and the federal government need to thinking decades, not years.
And 1ft is the mid level, not the high level, and disregards storms, storm surges and other melts.
You haven't noticed the steady improvement? It's pretty clearly documented that the economic improvements implemented have help.
Of course one side want's to NOT do anything under the presumption that making rich people richer will fix everything.
How is wiping out millions of sqr miles not a pressing national issue?
yes it's called low country, not 'bottom of the ocean country'.
Just a tip: The oceans aren't fresh water.
"from Florida to the middle of North Carolina will be an uninhabited, u"
so we should fence them off now, make a note of everyone who thinking Man Made Global Warming is a 'controversy' and it isn't real, and never let them out.? ok.
OF course there will be survivors. People will move as it happens more and more.
That's not the question. the question is:
DO we want a long term planned systems of codes to handle the changes.
WHy unfortunate? I have several games I'd like to resell.
I suppose(going out on a limb here) they could note what has been resold and not support it.
OR everything will be supported with hats and crates.heh.
It means people have rights of resale. It's basic consumer protection and a good thing.
"Now software companies will abandon support for old versions even faster"
WTF? No, it means people who get is second hand won't have support.
Let see this in the US please.
Ha!
" I would guess the jury's out on that one,"
no, it isn't. It's safe. The only people saying it isn't is dimwits and people looking to create a fake "controversy"
Or the could call your cable company.