Ac's aren't worth replying to. Especially ones claiming " I'm a member of a fairly large community of hackers" I Mean, look at the posters 'logic' "When ever I do something worth banning, I get banned; therefore the banning system works'.
and this precious gem:\ "With literally tens to hundreds of thousands of data points between us,"
I mean, really. He's just some teenagers being "internet right", or some delude moron.
To some people it is. They don't want there usage monetized, monitored, interrupted. They don't want to come home and have 20 minutes to blow off steam only to get message 37.
No..not available on request. That can turn someone from having a really bad day, to destroying them. Ye,s they need to be available, but you should need to go through the courts to get them.
They were warned and they made a choice - and the narrative quickly went from "police brutality" to "protester choice"." False choice. Do what we say, are you will be in immense pain.
I have no problem with the police filming. I think they should only become public under certain circumstances. IF the police are going to film, then there shouldn't be any cuts in the film, ever.
From my understanding, it's too integrated. IT's isn't a single player game with multiplier added on. It's a multiplayer game with the ability to no let others join you group. So they would need to create a version instead of patch it.
That said, the people I know a Blizzard might be wrong, or blizzard will decides it worth while and a new release will do it. If they do, I would probably go back to the game.
Stories are for..stories. Media is secondary. Doesn't mean it has to be about the story all the time, but when all you have is 'Click a lot' having a decent story gives reason to see the next bit. When the next pit is the same as the last bit, then it's important.
WoW has some great stories. Unlike D3. Yawn.
Anyways, Never play Max Payne, it's all about the story. You overly simple view of entertainment would hate it. Maybe when you are 30 you can enjoy it.
haha, no. I talked to support several times. Telling them, no, someone got into my account that I no longer use, because I don't pay you money any more. Why would you even allow people to use that account.
This happen even after I went to the secure token. It seems to be taken care of, but man.
"Time and time again ivory tower eggheads have turned out to be wrong, despite all their book learning." Yes, they get new data, apply it to what they currently have. If it shows that where wrong, then say they where wrong and produce a more accurate model.
That is exactly what you want. That is why Ivory Tower Eggheads should be listen to and not made an ad hom, attack from plebes like you.
For the record, they are more often correct, and new data will modify a model, not destroy it.
Einstein didn't prove Newton wrong, he only showed the gravitational model had more complexities.
"The jewish community has maintained geneology records to an unrivaled leve" err.. no. You go back a few hundred years, and a lot of it was based on hearsay. Their is all kind of problems with that data.
Which doesn't mean they aren't the best records, just in the context and the way you wrote it you are comparing "Best ever" with "Good'.
Considering you don't have any genes in common with ANYONE more then 50 generations back, it's impossible to tell if if he did exist; which is highly unlikely.
"Genetic History of White People that proves Whites are distinct race " A) He didn't do that, so please stop making shit up B) If he "Proved it"? then yes, it's an honest scholarly proof, and like all proofs, must be preserved.
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white." No matter how many times you say it, it's still won't be true. Unless you have some proof? which I doubt, because if you did you would say so.
Race as a biological intention of 'subspecies' then no, there is only humans. There are no subspecies of humans.
You don't seem to uderstand what Genocide is: genocide/jensd/ Noun: The deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation.
Stop confusing ethnicity with race.
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white." And that is complete utter nonsense.
You can get information from the gene code to have a better probability with certain factors.
I mean,. having someone come up with an 'racial purity' test o nonsense and below the aspiration of s civilized person, but that's a separate issue. You8 could tell that the person had no 'middle eastern' heritage, for example.
However you can also have a man who is very black, and be eastern European heritage. Radio lav did an excellent story on this, btw.
What you can not do, is look at someone skin and build and actually know ancestral history. I'm not talking about apparent or grand parent,s but many generations.
Slashdot Mirror
Ac's aren't worth replying to. Especially ones claiming " I'm a member of a fairly large community of hackers"
I Mean, look at the posters 'logic' "When ever I do something worth banning, I get banned; therefore the banning system works'.
and this precious gem:\
"With literally tens to hundreds of thousands of data points between us,"
I mean, really. He's just some teenagers being "internet right", or some delude moron.
To some people it is.
They don't want there usage monetized, monitored, interrupted. They don't want to come home and have 20 minutes to blow off steam only to get message 37.
No..not available on request. That can turn someone from having a really bad day, to destroying them. Ye,s they need to be available, but you should need to go through the courts to get them.
They were warned and they made a choice - and the narrative quickly went from "police brutality" to "protester choice"."
False choice. Do what we say, are you will be in immense pain.
I have no problem with the police filming. I think they should only become public under certain circumstances. IF the police are going to film, then there shouldn't be any cuts in the film, ever.
They have categorically said they wont.
From my understanding, it's too integrated. IT's isn't a single player game with multiplier added on. It's a multiplayer game with the ability to no let others join you group.
So they would need to create a version instead of patch it.
That said, the people I know a Blizzard might be wrong, or blizzard will decides it worth while and a new release will do it. If they do, I would probably go back to the game.
Correct. It's the first game from Blizzard that just isn't worth it.
"Stories are for books and movies."
How sad.
Stories are for..stories. Media is secondary.
Doesn't mean it has to be about the story all the time, but when all you have is 'Click a lot' having a decent story gives reason to see the next bit. When the next pit is the same as the last bit, then it's important.
WoW has some great stories. Unlike D3. Yawn.
Anyways, Never play Max Payne, it's all about the story. You overly simple view of entertainment would hate it. Maybe when you are 30 you can enjoy it.
haha, no. I talked to support several times. Telling them, no, someone got into my account that I no longer use, because I don't pay you money any more. Why would you even allow people to use that account.
This happen even after I went to the secure token.
It seems to be taken care of, but man.
Well, I guess if your brain is only limited to ancient repetitive games, that's cool. Been there done that, don't need to do it again.
Second. Well worth the 20 bucks. If you buy on stream, you get Torch light 1 for free.
I wonder if MyCleanPC know that people with user names claiming the rap whom every they want or astroturfing for them?
Blizzards banning in notoriously inaccurate.
Not in the tradition sense, it doesn't.
Even when playing solo, it's built for you to use the auction house.
So while you are playing, you are still online with everyone else.
Should they have created a stand alone single player mode? Yes. But they didn't.
in Wow, several times. All of them after I no longer played the game.
So Blizzards 'banning' is laughable.
And D3 is very, very boring. No now creativity, boring story full of holes.
It's perfectly ethical to do the tests.
What you do with the results will determine how ethical you are with the data.
"Time and time again ivory tower eggheads have turned out to be wrong, despite all their book learning."
Yes, they get new data, apply it to what they currently have. If it shows that where wrong, then say they where wrong and produce a more accurate model.
That is exactly what you want. That is why Ivory Tower Eggheads should be listen to and not made an ad hom, attack from plebes like you.
For the record, they are more often correct, and new data will modify a model, not destroy it.
Einstein didn't prove Newton wrong, he only showed the gravitational model had more complexities.
"Genetics is my job, bitch."
as a scientist, or the guy who runs IT cables?
Because you historic posts don't read like a scientists writing. They lacj a certian professionalism and measure tone.
No ancestor past 50 generation has any impact on your current genes.
So, it doesn't it matter in the very literal sense of the term.
"The jewish community has maintained geneology records to an unrivaled leve"
err.. no. You go back a few hundred years, and a lot of it was based on hearsay. Their is all kind of problems with that data.
Which doesn't mean they aren't the best records, just in the context and the way you wrote it you are comparing "Best ever" with "Good'.
Considering you don't have any genes in common with ANYONE more then 50 generations back, it's impossible to tell if if he did exist; which is highly unlikely.
"Genetic History of White People that proves Whites are distinct race "
A) He didn't do that, so please stop making shit up
B) If he "Proved it"? then yes, it's an honest scholarly proof, and like all proofs, must be preserved.
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
No matter how many times you say it, it's still won't be true.
Unless you have some proof? which I doubt, because if you did you would say so.
Yes. If you gte a test so you can tell people you don't have a spcific kind of ancestory, you are a douchbag.
The second test is watching Jersey Shore.
Followed by uttering 'Bros. before Hos in any serious context.
Followed by owning a Mac~
Race as a biological intention of 'subspecies' then no, there is only humans. There are no subspecies of humans.
You don't seem to uderstand what Genocide is:
genocide/jensd/
Noun:
The deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation.
Stop confusing ethnicity with race.
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
And that is complete utter nonsense.
You can get information from the gene code to have a better probability with certain factors.
I mean,. having someone come up with an 'racial purity' test o nonsense and below the aspiration of s civilized person, but that's a separate issue.
You8 could tell that the person had no 'middle eastern' heritage, for example.
However you can also have a man who is very black, and be eastern European heritage.
Radio lav did an excellent story on this, btw.
What you can not do, is look at someone skin and build and actually know ancestral history. I'm not talking about apparent or grand parent,s but many generations.