Yes, but , once again, to get an accurate idea of what s the touch screen is like, and how good it is to see things, you need to be ther ein perosn. Plus I get much better deals on Phones at BestBuy then any where else.
No. Kids will find that boring. You need to gently rise them to that level of interest. I suspect if his reading is subpar, and his 'parents' haven't bothered with chemistry, his math skills aren't all too hot either.
It's hard to find a home schooling group. Sure, there are a lot of friendly one, but the vast majority are doing it for either: Religious beliefs. Ignorance about the schools system.
I say hard, but frankly I haven't found one that doesn't have some crazy illiteracy bouncing around. From young earth to anti-vaccines.
And of course actual science and teaching are disciplines, not something you read from a book. Personally, My kids go do school during the week, and then I sneak home schooling in under the guise of fun science. Well, my kids are much older now, so there really isn't any guise about it anymore.
Explain basic reactions. Don't get into Moles, or math.
Give him the tools, get him to ask question and experiment. When something happen and he want to know why, don't tell him. Show him how to find out. My kids are quite internet savey because often when they wan to know something, I'll find a good page, and read it with them. You're not lecturing, they are digging. I never said 'just cause' to my kids. when they wen through their Why phase I answered everything as accurate as reasonable, and if I didn't know, we looked it up. Every time I hear parent create a disengenious answer I cringe a little. ITwill be so hard to gte that piece of bad information out of their head.
If he is into something, have a goal related to that that can be solved with what you want to teach, in this case chemistry, then do that.
For example, maybe he is into trains. Well, what chemicals can you get to have him experiment with to make smoke? Volcanoes? well , that's an easy one.
When he figures something out, but wan'ts it to be better, then introduce to some more complex chemistry ideas.
If you want to impress him, make some elephant toothpaste. Get your supplies from a chemistry supply place.
Mentos at soda is another great way to get them to ask question.
OTOH, if his homeschooling was done by lazy people, he may have had the why in him buried deep under a lie of belief. SO you need to gently get it back out.
Are you really that clueless? seriously? do you think Intel only makes CPUs? Intel did better then every other semiconductor company in 2011. Do you know why? because of the mobile market.
I guess if a company isn't constantly littering you with what it does, you figure they do nothing.
So what do you think is better: Language design for certain task groups?(a language Firmware,a language for UI, etc..) or a language that one can do anything with
Well they did a bad job, because with the exception of one overly contrived situation, it worked. It was far more difficult to plant evidence in that scenario then currently.
I think maybe he realized that and acted angrily because his emotion position was questioned by the movie.
Of course like all distopian films, it ended with the stupidest resolution: shut it all down.
Considering it's track record, and that the point of the movie is that if one knows his or her future, he or she can change it, perhaps they should send people to talk to the people whoa re going to commit these murders?
"Because the very idea of being arrested and convicted of a crime you haven't yet convicted pissed me off to the point where I couldn't stand to watch another minute," why? can you logically lay out why?
SO walking into a bank with a mask, gun, and a note, but not talking to the tellers isn't suspicious?
"Slippery Slope" Nice. I wonder if you have a reason that isn't fallacious.
no one would be safe from arrest ever again." which has nothing to do with this discussion. People want it to, but it doesn't.
Just to point out: That if you could predict the future crime with 90% accuracy, then that judicial system would put fewer innocent people behind bars that our current judicial system. And contrary to/,. group think, our system is pretty damn good.
tricky question, it usually depend on other things. For example, recording discussions, complaints from someone you're stalking, and so on.
"Just because I own rope, duct tape, a duffle bag, and several big-ass hunting knives, which occasionally get stored together, by no means indicates I have any intention to harm another person." correct. However when they have been gathered together after you have threatened to kill someone, now they are suspicious. Sure, you might be preparing to go into the wilderness to blow off some steam. OTOH, it's still suspicious.
Just because I have plastic laid down, medicals knives laid out and a women tied down to a examining tables doesn't MEAN I was going to do her harm. OTOH, if someone saw that through a window, it would be worth reporting investigating.
I've done all those, and still do. Not arrested. Hell, I've hardly even been beaten~
joke, I've never been beaten. My dad was once, but frankly he had it coming. That was the 70's. when driving drunk and when getting pulled over you take a few swing at the cops got you munched in the stomach, hand cuffed and then driven home.
As a side note, he didn't do it again.
Frankly, it's preferable then the 'now we ruin you're life for ever' mentality. Thanks MADD!
You should do then what you should be doing down. Keep a diary, be sure to have explicit safe signals, always do it sparingly to help minimize more extreme long term damage..
Seriously about seeking help. Getting pleasures from these acts always is rooted in deeper troubles.
Slashdot Mirror
Then don't lie. Say "I don't want to give that to you'"
See, how hard was that.
Ah, Action Computers is gone? I don't live in CA anymore, but I used to go there.
So you are comparing prices on an item BestBuy doesn't carry?
Do you listen to yourself?
Yes, but , once again, to get an accurate idea of what s the touch screen is like, and how good it is to see things, you need to be ther ein perosn.
Plus I get much better deals on Phones at BestBuy then any where else.
Just because you are a tax dodging low life that puts the burden of having a decent society on others, don't assume we all do.
No,. the monitor is.
Funny, the public high school my son will be attending has an amply supplied chemical 'closet'.
No. Kids will find that boring. You need to gently rise them to that level of interest. I suspect if his reading is subpar, and his 'parents' haven't bothered with chemistry, his math skills aren't all too hot either.
It's hard to find a home schooling group. Sure, there are a lot of friendly one, but the vast majority are doing it for either:
Religious beliefs.
Ignorance about the schools system.
I say hard, but frankly I haven't found one that doesn't have some crazy illiteracy bouncing around. From young earth to anti-vaccines.
And of course actual science and teaching are disciplines, not something you read from a book.
Personally, My kids go do school during the week, and then I sneak home schooling in under the guise of fun science.
Well, my kids are much older now, so there really isn't any guise about it anymore.
Explain basic reactions. Don't get into Moles, or math.
Give him the tools, get him to ask question and experiment.
When something happen and he want to know why, don't tell him. Show him how to find out. My kids are quite internet savey because often when they wan to know something, I'll find a good page, and read it with them. You're not lecturing, they are digging. I never said 'just cause' to my kids. when they wen through their Why phase I answered everything as accurate as reasonable, and if I didn't know, we looked it up. Every time I hear parent create a disengenious answer I cringe a little. ITwill be so hard to gte that piece of bad information out of their head.
If he is into something, have a goal related to that that can be solved with what you want to teach, in this case chemistry, then do that.
For example, maybe he is into trains. Well, what chemicals can you get to have him experiment with to make smoke?
Volcanoes? well , that's an easy one.
When he figures something out, but wan'ts it to be better, then introduce to some more complex chemistry ideas.
If you want to impress him, make some elephant toothpaste. Get your supplies from a chemistry supply place.
Mentos at soda is another great way to get them to ask question.
OTOH, if his homeschooling was done by lazy people, he may have had the why in him buried deep under a lie of belief. SO you need to gently get it back out.
If they go out of business, start a local cable resell company out of your garage. Buy a bunch of 99cent cables, resell for 5 bucks.
That's weird, here at the Tualatin store, it's usually cheaper for more then staples.
Of course, we have a Frys is Wilsonville, but the problem with that is that it's staffed by Fry's employees.
I used to own Frysucks.com, so maybe I'm biased.
I'l go there, but I won't talk to the employees., cause they're stupid.
Bestbuy is making the mistake of being a little of everything, but that's not working so well.
They need to eat into Frys business.
Are you really that clueless? seriously? do you think Intel only makes CPUs?
Intel did better then every other semiconductor company in 2011. Do you know why? because of the mobile market.
I guess if a company isn't constantly littering you with what it does, you figure they do nothing.
They make great software tools. Who has a bigger lead in software development at the chip level then Intel?
yes, in the cell phone market. Intel is a Semi-conductor company. They don't just make CPUs.
That's why they did so well in 2011.
So what do you think is better:
Language design for certain task groups?(a language Firmware,a language for UI, etc..)
or a language that one can do anything with
emotional buy in.; which is one reason why software development is such a pit.
So you really can't list many logical retorts, so you make up an excuse that you are 'tired'.
Well they did a bad job, because with the exception of one overly contrived situation, it worked. It was far more difficult to plant evidence in that scenario then currently.
I think maybe he realized that and acted angrily because his emotion position was questioned by the movie.
Of course like all distopian films, it ended with the stupidest resolution: shut it all down.
Considering it's track record, and that the point of the movie is that if one knows his or her future, he or she can change it, perhaps they should send people to talk to the people whoa re going to commit these murders?
Oh, and I love distopian films.
"Because the very idea of being arrested and convicted of a crime you haven't yet convicted pissed me off to the point where I couldn't stand to watch another minute,"
why? can you logically lay out why?
SO walking into a bank with a mask, gun, and a note, but not talking to the tellers isn't suspicious?
"Slippery Slope"
Nice. I wonder if you have a reason that isn't fallacious.
no one would be safe from arrest ever again."
which has nothing to do with this discussion. People want it to, but it doesn't.
Just to point out: /,. group think, our system is pretty damn good.
That if you could predict the future crime with 90% accuracy, then that judicial system would put fewer innocent people behind bars that our current judicial system.
And contrary to
tricky question, it usually depend on other things. For example, recording discussions, complaints from someone you're stalking, and so on.
"Just because I own rope, duct tape, a duffle bag, and several big-ass hunting knives, which occasionally get stored together, by no means indicates I have any intention to harm another person."
correct. However when they have been gathered together after you have threatened to kill someone, now they are suspicious. Sure, you might be preparing to go into the wilderness to blow off some steam. OTOH, it's still suspicious.
Just because I have plastic laid down, medicals knives laid out and a women tied down to a examining tables doesn't MEAN I was going to do her harm. OTOH, if someone saw that through a window, it would be worth reporting investigating.
I've done all those, and still do. Not arrested. Hell, I've hardly even been beaten~
joke, I've never been beaten. My dad was once, but frankly he had it coming. That was the 70's. when driving drunk and when getting pulled over you take a few swing at the cops got you munched in the stomach, hand cuffed and then driven home.
As a side note, he didn't do it again.
Frankly, it's preferable then the 'now we ruin you're life for ever' mentality. Thanks MADD!
That just means your internet skills are weak.
I agree with you about the arrest. Perhaps a visit from a person from social services?
Then you should get therapy.
That aside...
You should do then what you should be doing down. Keep a diary, be sure to have explicit safe signals, always do it sparingly to help minimize more extreme long term damage..
Seriously about seeking help. Getting pleasures from these acts always is rooted in deeper troubles.