"To put things in perspective, the law mandates that video rental records be private." haha. Oh yeah,. the Reagan law he shoved out because a republican was shown to be a hypocrite.
Yes, but that's part of the pattern. SO you aren't likely.
But if you spent a week searching on how t get away with rape* out of no where, then maybe someone for social service should give you a call.
People, like you in this instance, think singly, and thing they are some exception and there pattern is oh so different from everyone elses. You aren't, and is isn't.
*I chose rape, because almost all rapes involve methodicalness of planning of some sort, unlike more murders.
"Morbid fascination does not equal intent," correct, and everyone know it.
IT's because educated people can think more then in extremes? Because educated people can see that if there is strong enough correlation between a series of catch phrase an crimes it's worth checking it out?
By your argument, you shouldn't be pulled over if you are seen driving abnormally.
pre-cog* data mining alerts of a highly probably hit. Law enforcement, or preferably a social service person, shows up to ask the person some questions.
The person says 'I'm' researching a book', or 'I was curious about something on CSI' Social services person makes a note of that, probably a check box. Then asks the person if there is anything they need help with, and hands them a pamphlet with some phones numbers. Tells the person it's routine. Then leaves.
So if there was a problem, the person known there is a note and they will be investigated if search crime suddenly happens nearby. Reducing the odds that they will commit the crime. Giving them an option for other help.
Why would you set of a traffic block aide? why would you look for a car when you know where they live?
*this all hinges on there being a reasonable correlation between certain searches and crimes. I suspect there isn't, but I would like to seem some actual numbers.
The minority report did what every dystopian future story does; exaggerate to absurdity to make a point.
What if most people who do multiple search items on a specific way to kill someone go on to commit those crimes?
Couple of reminders: A) We aren't talking about arresting. B) The internet is public. C) Some crimes are methodically planned out over time. Rape, and most white collar crimes.
Of course, it comes down to numbers. I would love to see a study that looks at searches people made before committing a crime, and comparing the search, and how many times, to the generals populace search terms. It's it's really just noise, then we're done. But if it's a substantial correlation? That's a different discussion.
"So only medical students should be able to learn about those topics?" Well, no. But some of the stuff I have to deal with that has it's roots in a misunderstanding of medical research or basic physiology, and part of me wants to say yes.
How do you know? This could very well be a good idea, or it could be useless.
I would like to see some data. How many people search for several way to make someone pass out? is it noise? is there strong correlation between the search and an incident happening?
When you are searching on a public network for information on how to harm someone , then yes, it is pother peoples business. Let me know when you have you own private internet.
Just lie if you where zig-zagging down a public highway would also be my business... well everyone on that part of the highway.
Hypothetically, what if 25% of all people who makes more then 5 searches in a day regarding specific types of crime go on to commit that crime? 50% 75%?
And remember, I'm not talking about arresting. I'm talking about investigation. Meaning a law enforcement person goes and talks to them. Oh, you are an author? Hell, maybe there is a popular crime drama that was on, so searches for that crime are disregarded for a week.
YOu might want to actually read up on the involvement of congress over time in the schools system.
I can think of several great thing congress can do to help the school systems. NCLB, while the intent was good, it's a stupid program shoved into plavce by an incompetent manager who bought his way into presidency.
Take that money, and create an online textbook system. That alone would save the schools a boat load of money, and empower each school.
Federally has the advantage where it's harder to get nonsense into the science curriculum. This is why people who don't know how to think but want to dictate science use the divide and conquer tactic.
In order for ti to be competitive, they need to pack the fucking cars to crowded standing room only.
And do you thin rail is free? IN most places it's more expensive then a car.
Yes, displace the poor into communities that don't have the tax base needed to have service to help people rise out of being poor. And just when they get settled, here come the rich to make them move again.
". Commuting by rail is much cheaper than trying to maintain a car, much less hassle than driving a car, " I have never seen this to pan out in any commuting system in the US.
Did you read about the guy they ate another guys face? he was on a drug in the methamphetamine group.
Seriously, never legalize that crap, it destroys lives immediately. And drug the create psychosis, high energy and delusion should probably be kept out of general populace.
There are drugs that should be removed from the list, but there are some that shouldn't.
Slashdot Mirror
Well then, stick to your own private internet.
"To put things in perspective, the law mandates that video rental records be private."
haha. Oh yeah,. the Reagan law he shoved out because a republican was shown to be a hypocrite.
Anyways, you might want to brush up:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2710
it wouldn't apply in the context of this discussion.
Yuo knwo what I love about minority report? in that judicial system, substantial fewer innocent people go to jail then in our current system.
Yes, but that's part of the pattern. SO you aren't likely.
But if you spent a week searching on how t get away with rape* out of no where, then maybe someone for social service should give you a call.
People, like you in this instance, think singly, and thing they are some exception and there pattern is oh so different from everyone elses.
You aren't, and is isn't.
*I chose rape, because almost all rapes involve methodicalness of planning of some sort, unlike more murders.
"Morbid fascination does not equal intent,"
correct, and everyone know it.
IT's because educated people can think more then in extremes? Because educated people can see that if there is strong enough correlation between a series of catch phrase an crimes it's worth checking it out?
By your argument, you shouldn't be pulled over if you are seen driving abnormally.
You're scenario is stupid.
pre-cog* data mining alerts of a highly probably hit. Law enforcement, or preferably a social service person, shows up to ask the person some questions.
The person says 'I'm' researching a book', or 'I was curious about something on CSI'
Social services person makes a note of that, probably a check box. Then asks the person if there is anything they need help with, and hands them a pamphlet with some phones numbers. Tells the person it's routine. Then leaves.
So if there was a problem, the person known there is a note and they will be investigated if search crime suddenly happens nearby.
Reducing the odds that they will commit the crime. Giving them an option for other help.
Why would you set of a traffic block aide? why would you look for a car when you know where they live?
*this all hinges on there being a reasonable correlation between certain searches and crimes. I suspect there isn't, but I would like to seem some actual numbers.
The minority report did what every dystopian future story does; exaggerate to absurdity to make a point.
What if most people who do multiple search items on a specific way to kill someone go on to commit those crimes?
Couple of reminders:
A) We aren't talking about arresting.
B) The internet is public.
C) Some crimes are methodically planned out over time. Rape, and most white collar crimes.
Of course, it comes down to numbers. I would love to see a study that looks at searches people made before committing a crime, and comparing the search, and how many times, to the generals populace search terms. It's it's really just noise, then we're done. But if it's a substantial correlation? That's a different discussion.
"So only medical students should be able to learn about those topics?"
Well, no. But some of the stuff I have to deal with that has it's roots in a misunderstanding of medical research or basic physiology, and part of me wants to say yes.
No iot isn't. Objectively, through research, shorter line as easier to read...well except for you because you are a precious unique rainbow.
How do you know? This could very well be a good idea, or it could be useless.
I would like to see some data. How many people search for several way to make someone pass out? is it noise? is there strong correlation between the search and an incident happening?
When you are searching on a public network for information on how to harm someone , then yes, it is pother peoples business.
Let me know when you have you own private internet.
Just lie if you where zig-zagging down a public highway would also be my business... well everyone on that part of the highway.
Hypothetically, what if 25% of all people who makes more then 5 searches in a day regarding specific types of crime go on to commit that crime? 50% 75%?
And remember, I'm not talking about arresting. I'm talking about investigation. Meaning a law enforcement person goes and talks to them.
Oh, you are an author? Hell, maybe there is a popular crime drama that was on, so searches for that crime are disregarded for a week.
text books. Html 5 interactive text books. Start with K-5, then move on up.
Please.
More importantly, can they spell?
"Hars working", sheeesh.
let them stay. Educated immigrants are more likely to start their own business. So where do you want that business to be?
Five little words to inform the world you know nothing about economics.
YOu might want to actually read up on the involvement of congress over time in the schools system.
I can think of several great thing congress can do to help the school systems. NCLB, while the intent was good, it's a stupid program shoved into plavce by an incompetent manager who bought his way into presidency.
Take that money, and create an online textbook system.
That alone would save the schools a boat load of money, and empower each school.
Federally has the advantage where it's harder to get nonsense into the science curriculum. This is why people who don't know how to think but want to dictate science use the divide and conquer tactic.
There is a reason those laws where put into place.
"I do not have to pay health insurance either and that is also a plus that doubles the cost of employees."
So, no you never have run a business then?
You people really don't understand economic of business, do you?
A) Investors see value in being in certain areas. Like it or not, perception is important.
B) What it take to get 200K in Austin can be used to get 2 million in the Bay area.
C) Diverse technology base
D) Diverse economic base
E) Diverse base of interests.
People are making money, create start ups and becoming rich. So, empirically there is good reasons to be in the bay area.. and other large cities.
Rail suck. All public transportation sucks.
In order for ti to be competitive, they need to pack the fucking cars to crowded standing room only.
And do you thin rail is free? IN most places it's more expensive then a car.
Yes, displace the poor into communities that don't have the tax base needed to have service to help people rise out of being poor. And just when they get settled, here come the rich to make them move again.
". Commuting by rail is much cheaper than trying to maintain a car, much less hassle than driving a car, "
I have never seen this to pan out in any commuting system in the US.
I've never had a hobo complain that the internet connect was 'too slow'.
It was a siemple math example of how 1/8th doesn't equal more money at the end of the year. I mean, really a child could see that.
money and weather.
"There is no reason why its expensive "
yes there is, Demand.
"Portland is nice too but to expensive for my tastes."
Are you high?
by what metric is Austin cheaper then Portland?
There are a ton of advantage to the Bay area and California; especially for start ups.
Every try to get investor in Portland? You go to shmooze some n for months just to get a 100K.
In California you almost always know after the pitch whether or not they will invest.
"Unless you make it as a very rich .COM and become a mulit million aire you can not ever be middle class."
This is quite provable false.
haha, Austin has been trying to say the for over 3 decades. Fact is, Austin doesn't have the money or the technical diversity.
.
That was the plot to Cheers..except of course, Cheers was good.
Did you read about the guy they ate another guys face? he was on a drug in the methamphetamine group.
Seriously, never legalize that crap, it destroys lives immediately. And drug the create psychosis, high energy and delusion should probably be kept out of general populace.
There are drugs that should be removed from the list, but there are some that shouldn't.
No one drive in New York, too much traffic.
And you know what? sometime odd things happen, and factors turn out to be more extreme then normal..
Of course, sometimes people are drunk. I just assume if they are piloting a ship, they are either Ffolkes*, or a drunk pirate.
*Roger Moore's best film. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081809/
Yeah, but when the need to pull it out of display to lainch it to save us from [X] it needs to be flight ready!
I'm sure some one at Syfy is writing the right now.