Monogamy is relativity new. A few hundred years old. There is a reason the penis is shaped in such way as to try to remove semen from a previous mate before ejaculating.
True, but you need to,look at what happened. IN this case it's pretty obvious. He completely changed nokia direction to favor MS, and it outrages a lot of people.
So? IT's a list of things. What has come to fruition? Yes, RnD is RnD and much of it won't come to fruition. But when you spend twice as much as the next guy, but hardly release anything new you go to kind of wonder what's going on there? I suspect the person in charge of RnD doesn't know how to run RnD.
How many robotic cars has MS on the road? There portable media device was how successful? The Gaming console has what level of errors? Their table was how successful?
With the money MS is putting into RnD they should be changing the world, instead they are running around like a bunch of clowns' Which is a shame. There was a time I wanted to do RnD for MS, but the people I met, and the culture regarding RnD is not one striving for success.
"and they have made some remarkable things. " such as...?
"Google has never really done any R&D of their own. " Lie. MS spends about 13% of it's revenue in RnD, Google about 12.5 % 8 billion and 3 billion. Google also has a ton more to show for it.
"Everything else is bought in" That's you argument for MS? Word, excel, Dos, Access, and most of their software was originally brought in. That's a stupid complaint.
I lie how it went from book to research paper? Paul Adams is a hypocrite, and a guy who gto famous talking about what everyone else was talking about at the time. So I wouldn't be too quick to jump on just one side of of the issue if I where you.
Just so you know, the new on chip video stuff is pretty damn good. Soon it will be like the sound chip. Good for almost everything. This is the same thing we have gone through many times. Networking: Card on board but sucks, use card Chip price falls on board pretty good, use card for network gaming Corporation stop using the card. Mobo manufacture highers network chip expert. On board good for everything except some extreme situation.
Same this for sound, Same thing will happen to graphics. There will be the really high end stuff, but for the vast number of users on board will become good enough.
Yes, I recognize that I could go out and drop 25 bucks on a better network card and drop my gaming latency 15% But my latency for most games is about 30. So making it 26 wont really improve my game much. If I go back into hard crore tournamant play, I would spend the money.
Bottom line: the gap from rated to actual use is shrinking, a lot. The fct that some people want to run the chip outside performance spec is fine,l but don't go crying to intel when it doesn't work the way you want it to.
I can add nitrus to my Dodge, but when the engine gets damaged, IT's not Dodges fault they they don't design the ability to do it into the Caravans engine.
"Intel marks perfectly good processors down to lower speeds intentionally because people won't buy them at the top price point." The makes no sense at all. Did you even think about the sentence? The cost is in the manufacturing. Lowering it's capabilities only adds more costs to the process. What really happens is that if more then a certain percentage in a run can' run at speed X reliable, the slow it down and test again. Repeat until percentage is low enough to sell. I know, boring and reasonable business reasons. Sorry to shit are your conspiracy theory, and you feeling that you are entitled to be able to over clock chips with no bed effects.
People should be punished for for spreading lies and commenting in a factual way about things they don't know anything about. This, let people go unpunished for spreading shit need to end. Because it's not only that person, it;s the people who read the comments. The poster is putting shit in the swimming pool.
It would be interesting if actual experts could have a special account, and they could mod +1 factual -1 wrong in the area of their expertise IT would be too expensive for/. to do, but it would be interesting.
Hell, I'd like to see an experiment just to see f having a bonafide experts modding would change the conversation to a more productive one?
How it's worded will also dictate is something is wrong. All the bold letters in the world won't change that fact.
"You mother is over weight" - Observed fact "You're mother is a fat ass lard beast" - Observed fact by a troll "You're mother is thin" Incorrect "You're mother is a thin whore" Incorrect and a Troll. "You're mothers children aren't as smart as people would like them to be" - Observed Fact "You're mothers Children are a bunch of drooling potato heads" - Fact and troll.
Today's lesson was brought to you be the letters F and U.
misstep after misstep? no. The made the mistake of changing the processor to that stop slot in the Pentium 3, and a small release of chips with a rare rounding issue. I don't want to seem like I'm downplaying the problem, it was a critical error and embarrassment for Intel, but it only happen in rare and specific situation, and the recalled it and replaced like a responsible company should.
"Had K8 gotten the success it deserved, " it got all the success it deserved.
" I've always felt that form should follow function" that was Steve Jobs fucking mantra. It WHY they are successful, you git. Their image comes from having better products.
Here's the problem people seem to forget; much to the advantage of apple.
The OS goes on many different hardware devices. So it's difficult with one phone having problem to judge is its the OS, the Hardware, the OS implementation.
I have huge respect for Woz. I give him more credence then pretty much any technical blogger. I really like how useful mt Nexus Android is, but I will taker a look wt windows latest offering when I want to upgrade. I probably won't, because MS links everything together in such away that fi one of them gets compromised, they all stop working.
You're not going to make a billion dollars, slow the fuck down.
Also, genius, it's a spectrum disorder. Ranging from people who might have it, or are just using it as an excuse to be a dick, like you, to people who can not funtion.
You falsely link intelligent with autism. IF someone made it so you were comfortable around people, you would still be just as smart as you atr. Not nearly as smart as you think you are, but that's the case now, so no change.
Parents of Kids that rock back in forth all day, drool on themselves and can't communicate would probably love to cure the disorder.
No, he seems to be asking what would people be saying if this research detected the homosexuality was a genetic expression. ONe that could potentially be changed.
It's a good question. He isn't saying where any money should be spent.
Yes, social skill and analysis skill are different. Your point?
"ust "turn" and autistic person into an engineer because it doesn't work like that." How do you know? I mean, no one else does, so , please, clue me in n your discovery. I assume you will be in next years Nobel list.
And you post reads like some who has assburgers instead of aspergers.
Yes, open software can work. This is not open software, it's a form of government. Have you ever even been in a large open source project? All of them have a person who makes the decisions, regardless of popular support. Now, with software you can spin off you own fork. I can't decide to go build roads because I don't like how it's being done.
False, it's been tried many times. Lasts about 2 years then someone has to make rules regardless of popular support.
You are mistaking not seeing one right now with never been tried. You don't see one, because anything too large and it fails. Too large being more then 100.
Hell, get a group of 20 people together who want the same goal, and it gets hard to manage the how.
Are you high? What smart ass remark? He made a valid point. One you don't want to hear, so you are getting all pissy because if goes against your gut \feeling of how things should be.
" its not all or nothing as he clearly insinuates" he did no such thing. You are creating a strawman, the second to last vestige of an argument without merit.
"Try asking people randomly off the street if they would like to tell government where to spend their money if you want a real answer." and most would say yes, and they would be wrong.
"So we create a form that is included with our tax returns instructing government where to spend our taxes and on that form there are allocations listed as well as fill in the blank" I look forward to paying taxes for free Superbowl tickets, homeopathy, no longer having public education or a quality highway system.
"Ever hear of this things called Free Open Source Software? Check it out, how it works." Yeah I have checked it out,. most of the time it doesn't work. Project end up being half don't problem go un-addressed while new functionality gets added.
Not a valid form of government for anyone who wants to keep advancing and needs to think in terms of decades and centuries.
In you situation, you will have many little pockets of money, none of which will be enough to do anything.
I have seen, first hand, what happens when a large ignorant group gets their way. I have seen people die because of it. Hell, we can't eve get exposed water covered and filtered without some groups screaming it's a conspiracy of some sort. They don't even get called out when say things that aren't even close to factual. "Covered water causes cancer"
Because people are selfish and have no clue how to plan for decades? because most people can't even manage their own money? Because nothing would get done.
I don't support rigged elections because they usually deal with issues on a larger scale.
A voter may not like the economy, but they should be telling expert what we should specifically do.
And how so you determine what amount? is the person paying the higher percentage get a higher say? is it real dollars?
"Does a politician who does not follow through with their campaign promises that people voted for them for, represent the people?" The fact that you ask that question makes it very clear you are pretty clueless.
The answer is 'Depends'. If they push for it, but are stymied by a group of Representative that won't let it pass, then it's hard to blame the person who wants to do it.
"The value of defense is more often to protect yourself from those you suspect of retaliation of the wrongs you've done against them." please stop with your dime store pop psychology. It's exactly the type of tripe that sounds good and get spread around by ignorant people who don't actually think about it. That is why the people have direct access is bad.
Monogamy is relativity new. A few hundred years old. There is a reason the penis is shaped in such way as to try to remove semen from a previous mate before ejaculating.
True, but you need to ,look at what happened. IN this case it's pretty obvious. He completely changed nokia direction to favor MS, and it outrages a lot of people.
So? IT's a list of things. What has come to fruition? Yes, RnD is RnD and much of it won't come to fruition. But when you spend twice as much as the next guy, but hardly release anything new you go to kind of wonder what's going on there? I suspect the person in charge of RnD doesn't know how to run RnD.
How many robotic cars has MS on the road? There portable media device was how successful? The Gaming console has what level of errors? Their table was how successful?
With the money MS is putting into RnD they should be changing the world, instead they are running around like a bunch of clowns' Which is a shame.
There was a time I wanted to do RnD for MS, but the people I met, and the culture regarding RnD is not one striving for success.
"and they have made some remarkable things. "
such as...?
"Google has never really done any R&D of their own. "
Lie.
MS spends about 13% of it's revenue in RnD, Google about 12.5 % 8 billion and 3 billion.
Google also has a ton more to show for it.
"Everything else is bought in"
That's you argument for MS? Word, excel, Dos, Access, and most of their software was originally brought in.
That's a stupid complaint.
I lie how it went from book to research paper?
Paul Adams is a hypocrite, and a guy who gto famous talking about what everyone else was talking about at the time.
So I wouldn't be too quick to jump on just one side of of the issue if I where you.
Just so you know, the new on chip video stuff is pretty damn good.
Soon it will be like the sound chip. Good for almost everything.
This is the same thing we have gone through many times.
Networking:
Card
on board but sucks, use card
Chip price falls
on board pretty good, use card for network gaming
Corporation stop using the card.
Mobo manufacture highers network chip expert.
On board good for everything except some extreme situation.
Same this for sound,
Same thing will happen to graphics.
There will be the really high end stuff, but for the vast number of users on board will become good enough.
Yes, I recognize that I could go out and drop 25 bucks on a better network card and drop my gaming latency 15% But my latency for most games is about 30.
So making it 26 wont really improve my game much. If I go back into hard crore tournamant play, I would spend the money.
That's completly wrong.
Bottom line: the gap from rated to actual use is shrinking, a lot.
The fct that some people want to run the chip outside performance spec is fine,l but don't go crying to intel when it doesn't work the way you want it to.
I can add nitrus to my Dodge, but when the engine gets damaged, IT's not Dodges fault they they don't design the ability to do it into the Caravans engine.
"Intel marks perfectly good processors down to lower speeds intentionally because people won't buy them at the top price point."
The makes no sense at all. Did you even think about the sentence? The cost is in the manufacturing. Lowering it's capabilities only adds more costs to the process.
What really happens is that if more then a certain percentage in a run can' run at speed X reliable, the slow it down and test again. Repeat until percentage is low enough to sell. I know, boring and reasonable business reasons. Sorry to shit are your conspiracy theory, and you feeling that you are entitled to be able to over clock chips with no bed effects.
People should be punished for for spreading lies and commenting in a factual way about things they don't know anything about. This, let people go unpunished for spreading shit need to end. Because it's not only that person, it;s the people who read the comments. The poster is putting shit in the swimming pool.
It would be interesting if actual experts could have a special account, and they could mod +1 factual -1 wrong in the area of their expertise /. to do, but it would be interesting.
IT would be too expensive for
Hell, I'd like to see an experiment just to see f having a bonafide experts modding would change the conversation to a more productive one?
How it's worded will also dictate is something is wrong. All the bold letters in the world won't change that fact.
"You mother is over weight" - Observed fact
"You're mother is a fat ass lard beast" - Observed fact by a troll
"You're mother is thin" Incorrect
"You're mother is a thin whore" Incorrect and a Troll.
"You're mothers children aren't as smart as people would like them to be" - Observed Fact
"You're mothers Children are a bunch of drooling potato heads" - Fact and troll.
Today's lesson was brought to you be the letters F and U.
misstep after misstep? no. The made the mistake of changing the processor to that stop slot in the Pentium 3, and a small release of chips with a rare rounding issue. I don't want to seem like I'm downplaying the problem, it was a critical error and embarrassment for Intel, but it only happen in rare and specific situation, and the recalled it and replaced like a responsible company should.
"Had K8 gotten the success it deserved, "
it got all the success it deserved.
"Consider the Auto analogy."
No.
The factory isn't scrapped every 3 years. What are you, the Drama Queen of the semiconductor industry?
AMD has never made a better product. Cheaper, yes. The same? briefly, once.
AMD is popular because ti rides on the 'Intel is big and established, therefore evil' wave of culture the exists in people under 30.
AMD is a technical yawn fest.
" I've always felt that form should follow function"
that was Steve Jobs fucking mantra. It WHY they are successful, you git. Their image comes from having better products.
One ring to rule them all?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq0EmbY3XyI
Here's the problem people seem to forget; much to the advantage of apple.
The OS goes on many different hardware devices. So it's difficult with one phone having problem to judge is its the OS, the Hardware, the OS implementation.
I have huge respect for Woz. I give him more credence then pretty much any technical blogger. I really like how useful mt Nexus Android is, but I will taker a look wt windows latest offering when I want to upgrade.
I probably won't, because MS links everything together in such away that fi one of them gets compromised, they all stop working.
You're not going to make a billion dollars, slow the fuck down.
Also, genius, it's a spectrum disorder. Ranging from people who might have it, or are just using it as an excuse to be a dick, like you, to people who can not funtion.
You falsely link intelligent with autism. IF someone made it so you were comfortable around people, you would still be just as smart as you atr. Not nearly as smart as you think you are, but that's the case now, so no change.
Parents of Kids that rock back in forth all day, drool on themselves and can't communicate would probably love to cure the disorder.
No, he seems to be asking what would people be saying if this research detected the homosexuality was a genetic expression. ONe that could potentially be changed.
It's a good question. He isn't saying where any money should be spent.
You're being overly touchy.
Yes, social skill and analysis skill are different. Your point?
"ust "turn" and autistic person into an engineer because it doesn't work like that."
How do you know?
I mean, no one else does, so , please, clue me in n your discovery. I assume you will be in next years Nobel list.
And you post reads like some who has assburgers instead of aspergers.
A) Identical twins does not mean 100% identical genes
B) Identical Genes don'e mean identical expression.
I notice how conveniently you choose to ignore the fact that you don't really know anything about genes or genetic twin.
.
Keep moving forward.
Now if they can only find a genetic link in why so many people on /. have Assburgers~
reference:
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-real-diseases-that-have-somehow-become-trendy/
Yes, open software can work. This is not open software, it's a form of government. Have you ever even been in a large open source project? All of them have a person who makes the decisions, regardless of popular support. Now, with software you can spin off you own fork. I can't decide to go build roads because I don't like how it's being done.
False, it's been tried many times. Lasts about 2 years then someone has to make rules regardless of popular support.
You are mistaking not seeing one right now with never been tried. You don't see one, because anything too large and it fails. Too large being more then 100.
Hell, get a group of 20 people together who want the same goal, and it gets hard to manage the how.
Are you high? What smart ass remark? He made a valid point. One you don't want to hear, so you are getting all pissy because if goes against your gut \feeling of how things should be.
" its not all or nothing as he clearly insinuates"
he did no such thing. You are creating a strawman, the second to last vestige of an argument without merit.
"Try asking people randomly off the street if they would like to tell government where to spend their money if you want a real answer."
and most would say yes, and they would be wrong.
"So we create a form that is included with our tax returns instructing government where to spend our taxes and on that form there are allocations listed as well as fill in the blank"
I look forward to paying taxes for free Superbowl tickets, homeopathy, no longer having public education or a quality highway system.
"Ever hear of this things called Free Open Source Software? Check it out, how it works."
Yeah I have checked it out,. most of the time it doesn't work. Project end up being half don't problem go un-addressed while new functionality gets added.
Not a valid form of government for anyone who wants to keep advancing and needs to think in terms of decades and centuries.
In you situation, you will have many little pockets of money, none of which will be enough to do anything.
I have seen, first hand, what happens when a large ignorant group gets their way. I have seen people die because of it. Hell, we can't eve get exposed water covered and filtered without some groups screaming it's a conspiracy of some sort. They don't even get called out when say things that aren't even close to factual. "Covered water causes cancer"
Because people are selfish and have no clue how to plan for decades? because most people can't even manage their own money? Because nothing would get done.
I don't support rigged elections because they usually deal with issues on a larger scale.
A voter may not like the economy, but they should be telling expert what we should specifically do.
And how so you determine what amount? is the person paying the higher percentage get a higher say? is it real dollars?
"Does a politician who does not follow through with their campaign promises that people voted for them for, represent the people?"
The fact that you ask that question makes it very clear you are pretty clueless.
The answer is 'Depends'. If they push for it, but are stymied by a group of Representative that won't let it pass, then it's hard to blame the person who wants to do it.
"The value of defense is more often to protect yourself from those you suspect of retaliation of the wrongs you've done against them."
please stop with your dime store pop psychology. It's exactly the type of tripe that sounds good and get spread around by ignorant people who don't actually think about it. That is why the people have direct access is bad.