Slashdot Mirror


Wozniak Praises 'Beautiful' Windows Phone

judgecorp writes "Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak has praised the user interface of Microsoft's Windows Phone, saying that aspects of its user interface are more 'beautiful' than comparable sides to the iPhone. The comments, in a New Domain, follow on from a comment by Forrester boss George Colony who blogged that Apple would decline in the post-Jobs era. Both pieces have kicked off the kind of online argument you would expect."

362 comments

  1. Re:Windows Phone 7 by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I played with a Lumia 900. It's well thought out but execution is lacking. The thing wouldn't get on the in store AT&T wifi. So I go to toggle it off and see what LTE is all about and the soft toggle for wifi on/off gets stuck in the middle. Err. What? It's a UI element! Really?

    Windows phone 7 is full of interesting and good ideas with poor execution and little polish.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  2. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah, and they've been paying clueless morons to rave about their shit on the internet too. Combined with subpar features and absolutely no interest from the public market, WP7 will make a fucking killing in Slashdot comment threads but nowhere else!

  3. Good thing its a Microosft.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because if it was a Microsoft phone this would look bad.

    1. Re:Good thing its a Microosft.. by vlm · · Score: 2

      Maybe thats the gray market Chinese import version.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Good thing its a Microosft.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it to some Chinese hacker to make the prettiest interface!

      Go Microosft, Go!

    3. Re:Good thing its a Microosft.. by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah! That Sorny TV I bought at the Ogdenville Outlet Mall has worked like a charm!

  4. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 0

    If Virgin Mobile picks up a decent WP7 phone I may be interested, actually.

  5. Microosft's by ryanmc1 · · Score: 0

    "Microosft's"
    Proofread much?

    1. Re:Microosft's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Proofread much?

      Why is it every microserf says "* much?" all the time? Can't you figure out some variation -- if nothing more at least for style?

      (I'm envisioning the reply: "grammar-nazi much?" *sigh*)

    2. Re:Microosft's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asshole much? :D

      I kid, I kid. Because I agree with you. While we're at it can we also throw "that's what she said", "stay classy", "the more you know", "you keep using that word[...]" and a whole slew of other banal cliches I can't recall into the trash too?

    3. Re:Microosft's by Xenx · · Score: 1

      But those are my coping mechanisms! With out them I have to face reality!

  6. Re:Windows Phone 7 by cptdondo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, the hyper-coordination between articles praising the WinPhone and gushing first posts is getting annoying.... How about a 15 minute rule between article and first post? Or maybe restrict first post to accounts that have been around for more than 15 minutes?

  7. Online argument? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Both pieces have kicked off the kind of online argument you would expect"... I expect the kind that has all the /. trolls and shills locked in I-wish-it-was-mortal combat for the next, say 12 hours.

    Too bad they both suck, Maemo 4evah!!

    /me's work here is done...

  8. Who is this Wozniak guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Probably some Anti-Apple shill.

    1. Re:Who is this Wozniak guy? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2

      I think his daughter is a professional tennis player.

    2. Re:Who is this Wozniak guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An astroturfer of course

  9. And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what if Woz praised something a competitor produced? He's entitled to his own opinion, negative or positive, and it says nothing about the state of Apple. Is Apple going to decline without Jobs? Who know, but Woz having an opinion is hardly a sign one way or the other. The only thing it does is dispell any notion that he's an arrogant prat who couldn't possible even deign to glance at a competitor's product without vomiting.

    Maybe this sort of thing gets to me too much, but I'm really fed up of this "you must be 100% for whichever brand-tribe you join!" guff. If he liked bits of another product then so what, that's competition for you.

    1. Re:And.....? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I'm curious to know Woz's opinion on things. Woz may be associated with Apple, but he's a smart geek who's been in computing since the beginning, and he's not a fanboi of any particular technology despite his Apple connections.

      Would you have written something similar, or considered it non-newsworthy, if the subject was Dave Haynie, Richard Stallman, Chuck Peddle, or James Gosling?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      he's not a fanboi of any particular technology despite his Apple connections.

      Which I think is something which appearss to be missing in large chunks of the general population these days (at least, the population who actually care about technology). If you take a glance down the comments sections of many sites it's a perpetual argument-to-the-death for their own personal preference. I even know people who are like that in person when it comes to tech, but why? Why are people so obsessed with insisting that what they have is the absolute best ever and don't you dare disagree with me? At which point did people stop being consumers and start being believers?

      Would you have written something similar, or considered it non-newsworthy, if the subject was Dave Haynie, Richard Stallman, Chuck Peddle, or James Gosling?

      That depends on the context. Stallman has heavily criticised Apple for their ethics, which is something I'd be interested in hearing about. Would I think it's shocking and newsworthy if Stallman picked up an iPhone and said "You know, I really like the aluminium body they give these things"? No.

      If Wozniak thinks the Microsoft phone is beautiful then fine. If someone wants to report "comments from a guy who knows about these things on #upcomingtech" then fine. But trying to tie that in to an article about someone claiming that Apple is in decline as if the two are somehow linked and therefore Steve must be about to jump ship? Come on.

    3. Re:And.....? by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I honestly can't imagine Richard Stallman saying anything positive about anything Microsoft produces due to him never giving it a shot because of his personal beliefs of how software should be.

      I wonder what kind of phone he actually uses...

    4. Re:And.....? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      OK, yes, the article lumped the Apple critic and Woz together, and I agree that was dumb.

      Be wary of that personal preference thing. I find myself defending numerous platforms, some I like, some I don't, because people go over the top in its criticism. That, I suspect, is true of many, and I suspect we all end up being labeled fanbois as a result, regardless of whether we're reacting to someone else's absurd assertions or not.

      To make matters worse, certain websites deliberately go out of their way to pick stories that are misleading, which results in legions of people posting "Oh no it isn't", not because it is their bias, but because the article is stupid.

      My personal biases? I like what Google is trying to do. I use Android because it's the best of a bad bunch, but much as I want to like it, I don't. I don't like what Apple is trying to do. I'm glad Microsoft, Google, and Apple, are doing their own things and I think WP7 brings a lot to the table.

      Oh, and if Jeff Minter or the reanimated corpse of Jack Tramiel has anything to say on the subject, I'd like to know!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:And.....? by Zordak · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder what kind of phone he actually uses...

      Probably one cobbled together from parts he cannibalized from old radios, digital toasters, and Clinton-era computers, running a custom ROM he flashed to the BIOS chip and a barebones customized "GNU/Linux." He has to carry the motherboard and RAID in a hemp backpack (which doubles as his exercise regimen), it has a full QWERTY keyboard that he keeps in a side holster so he can run his EMACS-based SMS client, and the display is a naked LCD running on an ISA framebuffer card, connected by a ribbon cable coming out the side of the monitor. He suspends the monitor from a helmet so he can go "hands free."

      It ain't purdy, but IT IS FREE!

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    6. Re:And.....? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      For that matter, Woz doesn't work at Apple anymore. So Microsoft isn't even a competitor.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "who's been in computing since the beginning"

      Really? He was just a baby then.

    8. Re:And.....? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I honestly can't imagine the Woz saying anything negative about anything, simply because he seems to be an all round nice guy. I imagine he has some negative thoughts about somethings but I could see him just shrug and think "Well, I'll let others who want to use this. I'll just use something else. In fact, I could probably build something that would do exactly what I would rather have."

    9. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the camp that says Apple will decline now that Jobs is gone. Apple will surely remain profitable and a market leader, but Jobs added an eye for detail and a uncommon stubbornness that shaped the best aspects of Apple products. Of course, there were many designers responsible for the look and feel of Apple products, but it was Jobs alone who said yes or no, and never without interjecting his own ideas. The great thing about Tim Cook is he really understands supply chain management, a critical skill. I think we will gradually lose the design subtleties Jobs brought. Example: I just got the newest Airport Extreme Wi-Fi basestation to replace my original 1st gen Airport Extreme. It's a very good, improved product , but now there's this large bright green LED on the front side that's always on. I've got the thing turned around just so I don't have to keep being drawn in to it. The original AE had pin hole sized white LEDs that went with the flying saucer theme of the device. The lights stayed out of the way, but when you did eye them, they communicated what they needed to in an elegant and attractive way. My gut feeling is the new AE was finalized during some point when Jobs was no longer hands on.

      I'm happy Woz could see the beauty in Windows Phone 7. I'm a Verizon subscriber on iPhone. I couldn't even get a Nokia WP7 in my hands until last weekend. The Metro UI's tile and text presentation is exactly I've been wanting in a mobile device. I preferred my Zune HD over over my iPod Touch for its interface. Whilst driving or walking about, I felt I could navigate the interface more efficiently with less diversion from what I was doing. For me at least, iOS demands that I explore the interface a little more than I'd like. Sadly, WP7 probably isn't going to get very many more hardware options than it already has. People ought to remember that Woz is a technologist. He likes what he likes. It's that simple.

    10. Re:And.....? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      IMHO RMS has too many humble opinions

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    11. Re:And.....? by crovira · · Score: 1

      He is WOZ not RMS. He's allowed to like things. :-)

      But seriously, there's nothing inherently wrong with the Windows phone interface.

      Its just that its designed for the needs of corporations, not people.

      What's actually wrong with the Windows phone, is that its from Microsoft, people with the soul of accountants, the flair of bricks, the intelligence of lawyers and the design sense of your office cubicle.

      --
      MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    12. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right... thats RMS you describe, not Woz at all.

    13. Re:And.....? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      don't forget, that holstered keyboard is really a proto board he soldered keys onto, because the keyboard is another tracking vector. and where's the inside out, tinfoil covered umbrella with 20lb speaker magnets connected to a colander on the tip and a deep-cycle battery on his folding razor scooter (collecting energy from his pushing off), for blocking any van eck phreaking attempts?

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    14. Re:And.....? by chrb · · Score: 2

      Woz actually visited the Googleplex to pick up his Android phone, posed with the dev team, and thinks Android is great: Woz: I Wish My iPhone Did All The Things My Android Does

    15. Re:And.....? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      For that matter, Woz doesn't work at Apple anymore. So Microsoft isn't even a competitor.

      He doesn't work there, but does draw a salary from them. And I assume he has a share or three of stock.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    16. Re:And.....? by dwlovell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Woz has 2 iphones as his primary devices. He says that Windows Phone 7 has a better interface than Android and chooses it over that platform, but he always carries multiple devices with him and still says his two iPhones (ATT and Verizon) are his primaries. Despite this, he praises a lot of aspects of the WP7 OS as better than iOS.

      Here is a link to a audio recording of an interview with Woz where he talks about all his devices and why he likes WP7 over Android:
      http://soundcloud.com/kopoint/the-report-steve-wozniak-interview

      Go to 6:25 to hear him say that iPhone is still his primary.

      BTW, I carry a Lumia 900 for personal bias warning.

    17. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its just that its designed for the needs of corporations, not people.

      Are you sure you know what you're talking about? Certainly looks to be the other way around.

    18. Re:And.....? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It could be the Wozniak is very unhappy about the direction of Apple and, it's myopic exploitative greed driven management ie Apple is no longer beautiful it is very ugly company. So a public complimentary comment about competitors software to sting Apple management.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >BTW, I carry a Lumia 900 for personal bias warning.
      There's an app for that?

    20. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    21. Re:And.....? by dwightk · · Score: 1

      you know he doesn't work at Apple anymore, right?

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    22. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EMACS SMS CLIENT??? That Bastard! All REAL open source people use VI for SMS!!!

      Am I a troll? Maybe. Do I enjoy it... Maybe :)

    23. Re:And.....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richard Stallman saying something from Microsoft is beautiful

      That would be the day. Well, I'm pretty sure I would be on the cover of TIME.

  10. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ThePub2000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I really like my WP7. It's simple and straight-to-the point in how it gets the job done. The MS Office integration between desktop 2010 and WP7 using live is excellent and I don't think it would be easy to live without now that it's something in my phone! My biggest complaint is that lack of "ease" of integration with Windows 7. The Zune software is really crappy. Additionally not being able to link with bluetooth is silly, really the phone should be able to do everything over BT but instead it's a pointless addition to any WP7 handset. Otherwise I have been really impressed by the WP7. I bought it not knowing what I'd get and have been more than pleasantly surprised.

  11. Re:Windows Phone 7 by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Informative

    However, that is about to change now that Nokia will be putting out quality WP7 smart phones.

    'Nokia' and 'quality' should not be put in the same sentence.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  12. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bah.
    Yet another obvious Microsoft shill.

    As to the story: There's a reason, Woz has been an engineer and not a designer at Apple.

  13. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude! You're totally right! Once I get this and Windows 8 I'll be like completely stoked!! And oh yeah, send me that sweet Bill Gates wallpaper, bro!

  14. Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech rather than going into management. He gives his honest opinion, saying what he believes to be true. There is no place for this sort of thing in the boardroom.

    1. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      Its a shame he will more than likely be shunned and skinned alive by the Church of Apple, as they have now found their Lucifer, their angel fallen from grace.

    2. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by gstrickler · · Score: 2

      While MS and the WinPhone proponents will jump all over this, it's not that big of a deal. Woz is a tech geek, his technical abilities are/were top notch. But I've used the UIs he designed/implemented. Frankly, his opinion on a UI doesn't carry much weight.

      He has also praised things about Android in the past.

      What does all that mean? Simply that the iPhone doesn't get every detail "perfect", other phones do some things better.

      But rather than take my word for it, here are Woz' words (from TFA):

      “The iPhone has a lot of beauty and simplicity, and you don’t get lost as much in it, but it is more awkward to use (than Windows Phone 7.5 Mango).
      ...
      “iPhone is my favourite phone. I did give my opinion that the Windows Phone had superior visual appearance and operation cues that were also more attractive. In my opinion, it sets the mark for user interface. I would recommend it over my Android phones, given that it doesn’t yet have the breadth of apps,...”

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    3. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's sad that Wozniak was always hindered by his inability to be a bullshit artist. It's just not in his nature to kiss ass or blow smoke. You ask his opinion and he gives it, without any regard as to whether or not it's what you want to hear.

      Unfortunately this quality, which should be considered a virtue, is usually considered a handicap in the corporate world.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    4. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I admire Woz. How can you not admire him. Yes, he gives an honest opinion, but it's the opinion of a man who is economically secure. Many of the so-called flame wars about preferred language or platform are by people who have a significant investment in said language of platform and they're simply defending their desire to make a living; others are assholes. If Woz finds a language or platform lacking, he simply switches without losing much; maybe the time he took to learn it. Whereas most of us here cannot simply change languages or platforms without a significant investment or loss of income.

    5. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But I've used the UIs he designed/implemented.

      For example? The Apple II OS did not have a UI beyond the command line.

    6. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      He gives his honest opinion, saying what he believes to be true. There is no place for this sort of thing in the boardroom.

      ...sayeth a terrible manager. The trick to good management is to say the truth in a way that motivates people to do the right thing in a productive fashion. Can you imagine where Microsoft would be now if they had, 10 years ago, taken a look at Windows Mobile 4, 5, 6, etc. and were honest with themselves about how much it sucked, and then fixed it?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    7. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      You're right, it should be allowed, and even required in the boardroom to speak freely. But it is not customary, and doing so will get you booted off the board.

      There should be a place for this sort of thing in the boardroom, but there is not currently in most of them.

      That's how I read the comment, and it makes more sense that way.

    8. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I've used the UIs he designed/implemented.

      For example? The Apple II OS did not have a UI beyond the command line.

      He rests his case!

    9. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unfortunately this quality, which should be considered a virtue, is usually considered a handicap in the corporate world."
      No, it's not. It's considered a handicap when it's used at the wrong time, in wrong place, or with the wrong person. The inability to sugar-coat your opinions, or to keep your mouth shut, is not a virtue. Having enough empathy, discretion, and sensitivity to the people with whom you work and do business to know how far to push your opinion is a virtue.

    10. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're confusing "User Interface" with "Graphical User Interface"

    11. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      But I've used the UIs he designed/implemented.

      For example? The Apple II OS did not have a UI beyond the command line.

      So you think a command line UI doesn't need to be designed/implemented?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    12. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Woz have nothing to do with the original Macintosh? And Lisa? (not that anyone admits having anything to do with Lisa)

    13. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad that Wozniak was always hindered by his inability to be a bullshit artist. It's just not in his nature to kiss ass or blow smoke.

      FUCK ME YOU GUYS ARE DILLUSIONAL.

      The man wrote a fucking book claiming he invented the PC IN THE TITLE. If that isn't blowing smoke what the fuck is!?!?

      The man isn't a saint. He has technical prowess and likeability. He's not a mean prick like Steve Jobs and he didn't make his way to the top stepping on people. But to claim he couldn't blow smoke is FUCKING DILLUSIONAL!!!

    14. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Nnother, more chilling, interpretation of his review is this:

      every man has his price.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    15. Re:Its not surprising that Wozniak stuck to tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *delusional ...idiot.

  15. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have fun with your windows phone and its 3 Apps.

  16. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think your post misses one huge flaw with WP7
    The developer API, it's too restrictive. No good way to get your apps to share data between each other. Only network connection allowed is HTTP. No single source of online storage (last I checked the SkyDrive API wasn't opened, so you can't use it, by the developer contract).

    Yes, it has a clean and effective API, but in terms of functionality from 3rd party apps, it lacks, and would still lack, even if it had all the developers of iOS and Android combined.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  17. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ZeroSumHappiness · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or you should visit the Firehose more often.

  18. Monumental failure. by GauteL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The UI may be great and the development environment good, but Microsoft, in a misguided attempt to lock developers to the platform (that only works when you have them to begin with), made it impossible to use c++ and OpenGL on them meaning every part of an Android or iOS game/app has to be rewritten to work on Windows Phone 7.

    When you make it too hard, developers will stick with the platforms where the customers are; Android and iOS

    1. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except Microsoft will eventually have tons of developers on the platform, unless you are suggesting that no one is going to pick up development for Windows 8. Once you start making Windows 8 desktop apps, they should be easy to convert to Windows 8 mobile apps.

    2. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are developers compiling their C++ to dlls and writing an interface layer in Silverlight. In addition, this.

    3. Re:Monumental failure. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I sure hope the apps won't be too easy to port. Keyboard and mouse interface do not translate well to touch. Nor does many open windows translate well to only one window open at full screen like on a phone.

      These two environments are so different that trying to move applications over without at least replacing the entire user interface will only end in pain.

    4. Re:Monumental failure. by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

      made it impossible to use c++ and OpenGL on them meaning every part of an Android or iOS game/app has to be rewritten to work on Windows Phone 7

      You meant "Java" and "Objective C", right? Because regular apps aren't programmed in C++ on either iOS or Android (although I believe the former supports it for regular apps, it's just most are Objective C anyway given the OPENSTEP API); yes, games on Android usually require a stub written in C++, but again, it's not the recommended way to write an app except for extreme circumstances.

      Also, I must admit to genuine confusion (I'm not saying you're wrong here, I'm asking...): If WP7 is .NET based, can't you use a C++ compiler that compiles to the CLR? Or have they prevented that in some way?

      In the end, I have to say I don't see what you're saying is a problem. I rather like the fact that Apple, Google, and Microsoft are doing their own thing. It's been a long time since we saw major tech companies implementing different visions of how computers should be - to me, personal computing died with the bankruptcy of Commodore, and we're finally, FINALLY, seeing a break in the idea that all platforms should be the same.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor does many open windows translate well to only one window open at full screen like on a phone.

      These two environments are so different that trying to move applications over without at least replacing the entire user interface will only end in pain.

      Look, it's okay not to care about Windows 8 at all, but if you're ignorant, don't go saying things like this.

    6. Re:Monumental failure. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 will allow multiple open tiles, I thought. You can even run explorer in one then run apps for it in that. Is this not how most current applications will be supported on windows 8?

      One application open at a time is not how most people use computers, and for good reason.

    7. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Objective C is a superset of C. Objective C++ is a superset of C++. You can use C++ without hassle on iOS. With Android you've got the NDK giving you access to C/C++. Hell, even webOS has the ability to use compiled (C or C++) code. Microsoft missed the boat here.

    8. Re:Monumental failure. by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Apollo" or Windows Phone 8, Microsoft's next version supposedly allows for native code support if the rumours are to be believed. But that doesn't help developers out there right now. Porting C written to OpenGL ES to C# XNA more or less qualifies as writing from scratch. Perhaps the big boys have the resources to put people to work on a port but I doubt many do.

      With just a little bit of glue and abstraction over input devices a game could probably share 90% of the code between iOS, Android and even the Blackberry Tablet OS / Blackberry 10. If you utilised some 3rd party gaming API it's probably even more again. Microsoft really need that native support and preferably OpenGL ES, even if its through gritted teeth.

    9. Re:Monumental failure. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Unless WP8 is getting full WinRT support I find this hard to believe. It may be that if you develop a WP7/8 app that it runs on Windows 8 (providing you do whatever is necessary to cope with the different layout) but whether the reverse is true is another matter entirely.

    10. Re:Monumental failure. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      made it impossible to use c++ and OpenGL on them meaning every part of an Android or iOS game/app has to be rewritten to work on Windows Phone 7

      You meant "Java" and "Objective C", right? Because regular apps aren't programmed in C++ on either iOS or Android (although I believe the former supports it for regular apps, it's just most are Objective C anyway given the OPENSTEP API); yes, games on Android usually require a stub written in C++, but again, it's not the recommended way to write an app except for extreme circumstances.

      shut up, it was about game devs. why do you think that there's gta III for iphone and android? because you can code your backend in c++, do a bit of code to interface that to the system and have a lot of the code shared between the two.
      now.. try doing quick and dirty port of gta III on current wp...

      sure, silverlight / c# isn't that hard, it's a somewhat nice development interface for doing simple apps. but MS spends a lot of money in convincing developers to run wp development as totally different branch.. different ui.. 100% different code.. so a lot of stuff ends up having somewhat equal android and iOS versions and wp as an afterthought(or as severely limited version due to platform constraints.. like skype).

      now they could fix it in a year or two sure. but windows phone 7 was already supposed to be the fix two years ago.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    11. Re:Monumental failure. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Objective C is a superset of C. Objective C++ is a superset of C++. You can use C++ without hassle on iOS.

      Yes, superset. Which means that if Microsoft "allows you" to use C++ on WP7, that's not going to make any difference with iOS apps if those apps are written in Objective C++ or Objective C. You won't be able to port them easily to WP7.

      With Android you've got the NDK giving you access to C/C++.

      Uh yes, and?

      I didn't say you couldn't write C++ on Android, I said you could. What I also said is that it's very rare, and not recommended except for exceptional circumstances. So most Android apps are not written in C++.

      Microsoft missed the boat here

      For "Microsoft to have missed the boat", they'd have had to do more than the OP was claiming - namely create an Objective C++ compiler (not C++, Objective C++) for the CLR, and presumably update J#, and create appropriate APIs to make porting easy.

      That's rather a lot of work to make it easier for people to port apps from Android and iOS to WP7, and it seems a little improbable it would benefit Microsoft as the platform would fast develop a reputation for having a lot of quick and dirty ports of iOS/Android software that really don't fit with the WP7 way of doing things.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    12. Re:Monumental failure. by GauteL · · Score: 4, Informative

      You meant "Java" and "Objective C", right?

      No. I meant C++. iOS and Android requires a bit of Objective-C and Java respectively, but you can write all your heavy lifting code in C++. For instance, you can write a whole C++ library and reference it in your Objective-C code, through Objective-C++.

      So you can essentially share quite a bit of code between iOS and Android. As an example, OpenSceneGraph (openscenegraph.org) runs on both iOS and Android, and that is a C++ based library. I wish I had specified this in my parent post so I didn't have to clarify this.

      Also, I must admit to genuine confusion (I'm not saying you're wrong here, I'm asking...): If WP7 is .NET based, can't you use a C++ compiler that compiles to the CLR? Or have they prevented that in some way?

      Only Phone Manufacturers are allowed to write unmanaged code for WP7 so that excludes native c++.

      And even if you can run managed C++ in the CLR, most C++ codebases can not compile this way without major changes.

    13. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      made it impossible to use c++ and OpenGL on them meaning every part of an Android or iOS game/app has to be rewritten to work on Windows Phone 7

      You meant "Java" and "Objective C", right? Because regular apps aren't programmed in C++ on either iOS or Android (although I believe the former supports it for regular apps, it's just most are Objective C anyway given the OPENSTEP API); yes, games on Android usually require a stub written in C++, but again, it's not the recommended way to write an app except for extreme circumstances.

      No he does not mean Java and Objective C - lots of games for Android and iPhone are written almost entirely in C/C++ and OpenGL with very thin Objective-C and Java wrappers to interface with the native environment. This makes it relatively easy to create cross games that work on both iPhone and Android. This also works on WebOS devices as they have a native development environment that supports C++ and OpenGL.

    14. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up, it was about game devs.

      If he intended it to be about game devs, he should have said that explicitly rather than writing game/app which implies non games too.

    15. Re:Monumental failure. by GauteL · · Score: 1

      "That's rather a lot of work to make it easier for people to port apps from Android and iOS to WP7, and it seems a little improbable it would benefit Microsoft as the platform would fast develop a reputation for having a lot of quick and dirty ports of iOS/Android software that really don't fit with the WP7 way of doing things."

      You're missing the point. I'm not talking about porting games and apps that have been written only with iOS or Android in mind. What I mean is that it is fully possible to start new Android and iOS projects where you write a considerable portion of your code ONCE and then write some small iOS / Android specific bits. For 3D-games you can probably get away with as much as 99% of your code base being shared. This isn't some "non recommended way for exceptional circumstances". This is fully possible and supported.

    16. Re:Monumental failure. by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. I meant C++. iOS and Android requires a bit of Objective-C and Java respectively, but you can write all your heavy lifting code in C++. For instance, you can write a whole C++ library and reference it in your Objective-C code, through Objective-C++.

      You can, but you don't. The point here is not that there's some hypothetical apps out there that might be easier to port if there was a C++ compiler for WP7, it's that there are, in practice, very, very, very few, because C++ is not the recommended language of development for either iOS or Android.

      You might find a small subset of games easier to port, but there really aren't many of them.

      So in practice it wouldn't help Microsoft or WP7 in any realistic way to do this. Developers wouldn't fell "Yay! C++! I can port my apps!" because... their apps aren't in C++.

      Only Phone Manufacturers are allowed to write unmanaged code for WP7 so that excludes native c++.

      Well that sucks. Still, if Microsoft really does want a ton of quick and dirty ports from an established platform, perhaps encouraging Android devs to use J# for the porting, supplying an API for the purpose, is the way to go?

      I suspect they'd get more ports than they'd ever hope to achieve by supporting C++, despite it not helping with iOS ports. The sum total of Java apps for Android strikes me as several times higher than the sum total of C++ apps for iOS and Android combined.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can safely say you're wrong here.

      The NDK didn't become usable, by common consent, until Android 2.3. The majority of games I see on both platforms (a) have graphics requirements so limited I suspect they're either rewrites or wrappers around a common HTML 5 core and (b) work with earlier versions of Android.

      If you're looking for C++ games on Android, you're looking at a very, very, small number as of now. It may increase in time, but...

    18. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This isn't some "non recommended way for exceptional circumstances". This is fully possible and supported."

      But not recommended, which you seem to be missing. I mean, you say "nu uh, IS NOT non recommended" but you're simply wrong there.

      YOU seem to be the one missing the point, you're bitching about a lack of support for a method of coding that is both non-standard for the platform and discouraged b y developers.

      So yeah, it is a totally "non recommended" way of programming, and it makes your argument look stupid and ill informed, hence your reticence in acknowledging it.

    19. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't they just allow qt?

      wait...

    20. Re:Monumental failure. by GauteL · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can, but you don't. The point here is not that there's some hypothetical apps out there that might be easier to port if there was a C++ compiler for WP7, it's that there are, in practice, very, very, very few, because C++ is not the recommended language of development for either iOS or Android.

      Look I really wish you would just speak for yourself because you lack the knowledge to speak for the rest of us. As someone who is actually writing a cross platform OpenGL game and knows how possible what I'm saying is, I'd like to ask you how you think all those cross platform blockbuster 3d games and classic game ports came along (I love all the classic point and click adventures)? Do you really think they rewrote everything in Objective C because it's the "recommended way" hen they could just slightly adapt their existing c++ code base and write a small Objective C fronted.

      I sincerely don't think you know what you're talking about when you say "not many", "a small minority", etc unless you only talk about toy apps like third party alarm clocks or "flashlights". It's not like each app says which programming language it was written in and you have provided absolutely no evidence.

    21. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Mono Touch and Mono for Android, share your business/model code between all 3 platforms. Mono Touch/Droid still use native api's for the apps, so they still look like android/ios apps (and you have to code different front ends for them) but you can share all your network/business/etc, plus you can use lots of .NET based libraries (assuming they contain no native x86/other) code.

      I'd rather do Objective C, Java, and C# than use them myself, but for business where time is money, it makes sense and they are reputable.

    22. Re:Monumental failure. by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      Not only is possible and supported, it's also extremely common. I've worked on iOS game development in the past, and spent a lot of time discussing various cross-platform approaches in the community. Both iOS and Android allow for the possibility of coding your interfaces in their native language, which build on top of a C++ back-end.

      Most cross-platform games and apps go this route because it allows a huge amount of code reuse between the platforms. The fact that it is so easy is the reason why you see so many cross-platform games, even from small development houses. Then you have ports of PC games like Grand Theft Auto, which draw heavily from their C++ roots with updated native interfaces. iOS in particular makes this absolutely brain-dead simple. Throw everything at Xcode, and let it sort out which compiler to use and how to link everything.

      squiggleslash wants to convey that everyone writes in Objective C and Java so this isn't a big deal, but that's simply not the case. Using a C++ core is an extremely common approach to allow simultaneous iOS/Android development, especially among game developers.

    23. Re:Monumental failure. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 will allow multiple open tiles, I thought.

      Not for Metro, no. You get two side-by-side at most, and even then only if screen is wide enough.

      Is this not how most current applications will be supported on windows 8?

      No. Current apps are supported by letting you switch to classic desktop mode from Metro, where you've got the usual floating windows and stuff. Desktop itself is presented as a Metro app, so it gets a tile at the start screen, and can be docked side by side with a Metro app, but that's about it.

    24. Re:Monumental failure. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You can't do this on WP7 today without jailbreaking it, which means that any such hybrid C#/C++ app will not get into the app store.

    25. Re:Monumental failure. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, I must admit to genuine confusion (I'm not saying you're wrong here, I'm asking...): If WP7 is .NET based, can't you use a C++ compiler that compiles to the CLR? Or have they prevented that in some way?

      Like Silverlight in the browser, WP7 only supports the subset of CIL that is verifiable (i.e. memory-safe) for third party apps. While VC++ can compile pretty much any C++ code to managed without changes to the source with /clr, the output is not verifiable (because C++ has things like pointer arithmetic), so it doesn't run on WP7. There is /clr:safe, which produces verifiable code, but it does so by restricting the use of all C++ constructs that cannot be compiled that way - which is most of the language. So it certainly won't help you take an existing C++ codebase and recompile it for WP7.

      You meant "Java" and "Objective C", right? Because regular apps aren't programmed in C++ on either iOS or Android (although I believe the former supports it for regular apps, it's just most are Objective C anyway given the OPENSTEP API); yes, games on Android usually require a stub written in C++, but again, it's not the recommended way to write an app except for extreme circumstances.

      Most Android games, especially 3D ones, are, in fact, written almost entirely in C++, with only a small Java stub to handle input & sound.

      Portable regular apps are often programmed with Obj-C/Java for UI, and C++ on the background. This is because, right now, it's the only way to reuse code between iOS and Android, and both platforms are sufficiently popular that doing so is an explicit goal from the get go. Because WP7 does not support C++, it does not benefit from this arrangement; but if it did support it, then it would (because then porting an app to WP7 would mean only rewriting the UI in C#, not the whole thing).

      In the end, I have to say I don't see what you're saying is a problem. I rather like the fact that Apple, Google, and Microsoft are doing their own thing. It's been a long time since we saw major tech companies implementing different visions of how computers should be - to me, personal computing died with the bankruptcy of Commodore, and we're finally, FINALLY, seeing a break in the idea that all platforms should be the same.

      There is a big difference between platforms being the same, and code being portable between them. There's no good reason why platform-independent code (that does not use any platform-specific APIs) should not be portable.

    26. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third party observer here. The parent or grandparent didn't mention games. I completely discredited everything you said after the "shut up" part. Don't be a dick.

    27. Re:Monumental failure. by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

      that user squiggleslash is certainly NOT doing cross platform native mobile app development.

      he's angry and full of misinformation.

      only a fool would look at iOS and android and think "lets write ALL the code twice, once in objC and once in Java"

    28. Re:Monumental failure. by daniel78 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Most serious game development *is* done in C++. Even on iOS (where ObjC is mainly used to interact with the OS ). I also disagree that C++ is not the "recommended language of development" - Neither Apple nor Google discourage it (though you could argue that they initially did) and seem to have pretty much accepted that its not going away for game dev.

      Even with liberal use of ObjC in an iphone game, a port to Android is still achievable with a modest amount of effort (methodically going through the code and replacing all the ObjC with plain C++). A WP port requires almost a full rewrite, and maintaining a new version of your codebase. Given the low install base, that's almost always just not worth the effort.

      I do agree (based on my own experience) that iOS devs do have a tendency to rely on propriety iOS APIs (yes, ObjC) in cases where there are plenty of open source C/C++ alternatives available (random example - loading .png files). If i was to put my conspiracy theory hat on, i might even suggest that Apple is providing a lot of "useful" functionality through its own (incompatible) apis in attempt to make ports more difficult. With a little care though, a cross platform game that can run on Win32, Mac, iOS, Android, and Linux, requires very little in the way of platform-specific changes. WP on the other hand is just, well... incompatible.

      The developers who might be won over to WP over are those who already doing XNA stuff for Xbox live, and/or pc, but this is a limited group. Seasoned game programmers(Console/PC) have spent years programming in C/C++ and are unlikely to want to make the switch. To me (As one of those seasoned devs) even Blackberry's new QNX based platform is way more attractive than WP. I don't know *any* developers who are doing WP ports who weren't paid by MS to do them (And even then, they subcontract the work out)

      With regard to you comment about porting android java apps, i think this is a more complex issue than you suggest. Apps that use the Android Java apis extensively are actually much more tied to Android (UI, OS) than those that are built in C++ (its pretty much unavoidable if you do anything remotely useful with UI). To port them you'd need to implement a good chunk of Android on windows phone. Even then you'd end up with an ugly android UI, looking very out of place as part of your WP experience (and given that how pretty it is, is their #1 (only?) selling point, I'm pretty sure MS doesn't want this!).

      In summary, I think MS have made a huge mistake - what they've done *might* have made sense if they were a market leader (like iOS), but with their current tiny market share, having such huge barriers for development is almost suicidal.

    29. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As someone who is actually writing a cross platform OpenGL game and knows how possible what I'm saying is"

      I don't know why, maybe I'm just getting cynical in my old age, but why is it that I read this statement and hear "I'm some kid who has this great idea, so I'm trying to write it, but it's not working out so well. But due to my failed attempt, I'm going to present myself as an expert."

      Maybe I'd be more inclined to believe you if you could point to applications you've written and published, as final works are much better proof of expertise. I'm just reminded of an applicant we had, who said he knew android programming, gave a link to his app, and when we looked at it, we expected more from how he'd talked it up in his resume.

    30. Re:Monumental failure. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I predict lots of people will be using the latter then. I am not sure why everyone wants to turn computers into the TV.

    31. Re:Monumental failure. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Yes, I also think that everyone sane would stick to the classic desktop. I work on Win8, but I only ever go into Metro to poke around and see what's there, and to debug Metro apps.

      It can be moderately useful on the desktop for those cases where a new app is written for Metro only. Even then I don't expect any useful apps in that category (judging from the stuff seen on iOS and Android), except for simple games.

      Tablets are a different matter, of course. Where this gets really interesting is for hybrid devices like Asus Transformer or Lenovo Thinkpad Tablet - where you'd use Metro when using the device as a tablet, and classic desktop when it's docked.

    32. Re:Monumental failure. by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Not recommended by whom? And for what reason?

    33. Re:Monumental failure. by daniel78 · · Score: 1

      NDK was certainly usable long before 2.3 - it was just a pain (and still is, because you still really need to support 2.2).

      I can't say for certain which games use the NDK and which don't, but as someone who has ported iphone games (hey, go buy MiniSquadron !!!), i'd say a straight C++ port is much more likely than anything based on HTML5 (Even using the NDK, android phone graphics performance is generally poor compared to equivalent iphone models. Relying on HTML5 , i suspect performance for anything mildly complex would be terrible)

    34. Re:Monumental failure. by thoth · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'd be more inclined to believe you if you could point to applications you've written and published, as final works are much better proof of expertise. I'm just reminded of an applicant we had, who said he knew android programming, gave a link to his app, and when we looked at it, we expected more from how he'd talked it up in his resume.

      And in turn, speaking with all the authority of the might Anonymous Coward, perhaps you could roll out your own credentials in this area?

    35. Re:Monumental failure. by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I predict lots of people will be using the latter then. I am not sure why everyone wants to turn computers into the TV.

      Because outside of /. most people still only know how to use their TV. Barely.

    36. Re:Monumental failure. by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Depends, really. If they made it easy to access documents and apps from Metro, I don't really know how much use you would have on a daily basis for desktop mode. I spend a lot of time in front of a computer, but there's very few times that I browse around the filesystem on my workstation for things. Usually I spend my time in apps. On a server, or when coding, that's different, but most people aren't operating servers or writing code.

      I definitely want the desktop option to be available and not be some afterthought, but if they really can intelligently simplify my usage, I'm all for trying it.

    37. Re:Monumental failure. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Depends, really. If they made it easy to access documents and apps from Metro, I don't really know how much use you would have on a daily basis for desktop mode.

      For files, it's more like Android rather than iOS in that there is a shared filesystem exposed to all apps. It's basically the same as what you see in Win7 when you open "Libraries" - i.e. Documents, Pictures, Videos etc are available; and there is a stock file selector.

      I'm not sure what you mean by "easy to access apps". Generally speaking, app would be represented by a tile on the start screen, much like it's an icon in iOS.

      spend a lot of time in front of a computer, but there's very few times that I browse around the filesystem on my workstation for things. Usually I spend my time in apps.

      Sure, but do you spend most of your time in fullscreen apps with UI that is clearly optimized for touch over mouse/keyboard (even if the latter is supported)?

    38. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, iOS apps could only be written in Objective C and the iOS development kit only worked on MacOS X. I don't think that porting apps between iOS and Android is very easy anyway, or we would see many more iOS apps available on Android (but there isn't). Most developers don't care about C++ or OpenGL, what matters is the easy and speed which they can churn out apps, and how many people will pay for them.

    39. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. Our engine is C++ and runs on both platforms. We have small stubs in Java/ObjC. Let's see, that's currently 6 games currently on both platforms, or coming soon.

    40. Re:Monumental failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you haven't actually written any apps that are meant to be on both iOS and Android. I hear a whole lot of talking, but it all seems to be coming from your ass....

  19. Not a Good Judge of the Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    (Posting AC because I'm at work and I don't log in from work)

    I love Woz as much as the next geek (and I'm an Apple geek so I love him even more) but he is not a good judge of the market's desires. That's what made the Woz/Jobs partnership so successful. Woz was the hardware geek who loved to tinker with the guts of a machine and play with it and Jobs was the marketing genius who knew how to direct that passion into making a highly marketable product. Woz is brilliant but he likes to get to the guts of a machine. That is about as far from what "the market" wants as possible.

    I'm not saying he's wrong - I haven't played with a WP7 phone at all so I have no personal experience with one - but I think people need to remember who's making the comments and what his passion is.

    1. Re:Not a Good Judge of the Market by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      I played with a WP7 phone at GDC last year. In all honesty i was impressed with it. It was snappy and responsive. The ui was clean and presented information elegantly. Unlike past windows phones, it seemed well designed for the form factor. My biggest complaints were (and this was last year) the .net runtime on the device didn't provide the full suite of .net namespaces, and their xna implementation really gimped what should be a really powerful open gl es graphics system. Also, it's app library didn't really compare to ios and android.

  20. Intelligentia? Is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you still shilling for your MS overlords?

  21. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a WP7 phone (HTC). I've never seen those issues. I'm guessing they are hardware/driver issues. I'm guessing the UI toggle is tied to the processing state of the action - it stalled in the middle, so it died.

    And you can't blame the phone OS if the store can't make their WiFi and phones work together. I've used my phone on my WiFi at work and the Sprint store, and had no issues whatsoever.

    WP7 has it's flaws, particularly with the 3rd party dev API, but the issues you mentioned seem more likely to be AT&T or the hardware manufacturer.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  22. Re:Windows Phone 7 by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Come on, that's not fair. The first poster, TechCar, has a long history of 8 posts dating all the way back to two days ago! :)

  23. Buyer beware! by MCSEBear · · Score: 5, Informative
    Since multiple industry journalists have stepped forward saying that current Windows Phones will not be eligible to receive an upgrade to Win Phone 8, it's difficult to think of current models as more than a scam.

    The one Windows Phone evangelist who claimed the current devices would be upgradable, quickly walked those statements back.

    Microsoft developer evangelist Nuno Silva apparently confused applications with devices when he claimed that users of Windows Phone 7 (aka Mango) would be able to upgrade to Windows Phone 8 (aka Apollo).

    Offering a mea culpa on his blog today, Silva said he was trying to echo Microsoft's own statements that existing Windows Phone apps would run under Apollo. But for some reason he gave the impression that current devices themselves would also be able to run the next version of Windows Phone.

    "I mistakenly confused app compatibility with phone updateability, which caused the rumors we saw yesterday," Silva wrote. "I did not intend to give the impression I was offering new guidance on any products under development or their upgradeability."

    The developer aroused hopes among the Windows Phone faithful by leading them to believe that Mango devices would be eligible to receive the Apollo upgrade. But various sources have been insisting for a while that there is no upgrade path.

    Source here .

    If you buy one of these "beta test" phones, you will soon be stuck in a multi-year contract with a device that will not be upgradable to the current version of the OS. There is nothing beautiful about that. Do not buy before Win Phone 8 is released!

    1. Re:Buyer beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because Microsoft paid for WP8 phones to be manufactured before they started the project and every developer working on them, or software to go on them, is using a secret pre-release phone and not one person has ever mentioned online.

      Or, maybe, just maybe, WP8 runs fine on WP7 phones. I'm sure its one of the two.

    2. Re:Buyer beware! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they just use an virtual machine like everyone does these days?

    3. Re:Buyer beware! by WolfgangPG · · Score: 2

      He back tracked on his comments, but didn't say it wasn't happening. Microsoft has already demoed Windows 7 running on hardware weaker than current WP7 hardware and demoed full Windows 8 running on WP7 hardware in 2011. I believe all current WP7 phones will get upgraded to WP8. They will probably lack features like iPhone 4 doesn't have all the iOS features than iPhone 4s does, but iPhone 4 does run iOS 5.

      Microsoft had Windows 7 running on a phone weaker than all current WP7 devices in prior to 2010. http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/microsoft_had_windows_7_running_arm_two_years_ago

      Full Windows 8 OS running on a 1.2 GHz, single core Qualcomm chip at Computex 2011, all of the way back in June 2011.
      http://www.windows8release.com/2011/06/qualcomm-ti-announce-arm-chips-which-supports-windows-8/

    4. Re:Buyer beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being that WP7 only really runs on one chipset, i'd wager large sums WP8 will support every single phone. I would be extremely supprised if Microsoft hadn't got airtight contracts on all OEM's, meaning all the manufacturers will make their hardware work with WP8.

      The telco's on the other hand, have always had Microsoft by the gentlemans parts, and call the shots. I'd wager Microsoft are having to beg and bribe all the telco's to allow WP8 upgrades, and to approve them in a reasonably timely fashion. Which is why Microsoft can't announce 100% upgradability.

      Telco's hate Apple for the power they have over them, yet i'd bet there are very few consumers, who like the telco's having the power.

    5. Re:Buyer beware! by MCSEBear · · Score: 1
      As a reminder, this is the same thing Microsoft did when they refused to provide upgrades to Win Phone 7 from devices that ran Windows Mobile 6.5. Even for devices which had the same basic specs at the Win Phone 7 devices.

      Owners of HTC’s highly-praised HD2 touchscreen smartphone will be unable to upgrade the device to Microsoft’s new Windows Phone 7 software when the OS is released towards the end of the year. Despite the HD2 meeting many of the criteria laid down in Microsoft’s ‘Chassis 1’ spec – including a 1GHz Qualcomm processor, high-res capacitive touch display, 5 megapixel camera and 3.5mm headphone jack – the phone will be ruled out for the simple reason that it has five buttons instead of the three mandated for all Windows Phone 7 devices.

      Source.

      Here are links to some of the sources saying the same thing is going to happen to current Win Phone 7 device owners:

      The Verge

      Mary Jo Foley

      Ars Technica

    6. Re:Buyer beware! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, basically the same situation as Android then - no idea when, or even if, you will be upgraded? :)

      Seriously, the Galaxy Note is getting a lot of ad time over here in the UK, enough to make me pick it up in a store and take a look at it (i find the form factor to be ... interesting, and I'd consider buying one for that - couldn't make a judgement on the OS as it was a dead display unit), but it struck me that it was still on Android 2.3 and I was sure that both Android 3 and 4 had been released (I know that 3 is tablet only).

      Sure enough, Android 4 has been out since last November - and Samsung have yet to confirm an upgrade date for the Note. Thats just wrong.

    7. Re:Buyer beware! by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't read anything into it either way. Microsoft has no control over whether there'll be updates from WP7 to WP8 on existing WP7 phones.

      We have the same problem with Android. Hell, many (most?) Android Honeycomb users (and if there was ever something clearly stamped "BETA! Do not use yet!", it was Honeycomb) are still waiting for an ICS upgrade.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:Buyer beware! by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      current Windows Phones will not be eligible to receive an upgrade to Win Phone 8

      Can you tell me which phones you've purchased because of a promised upgrade? Were you successfull in the OS upgrade with the blessing/support of the carrier? I have yet to know anyone whose purchased a phone not based off of what it currently does, but because of a promise that it'll get upgraded later.

    9. Re:Buyer beware! by MCSEBear · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except for the fact that when you buy a flagship Nexus phone, there isn't any doubt at all that you will, at the very least, receive the next version of Android.

      For people who buy Microsoft/Nokia's current flagship phone, the word on the street is that they are going to be screwed over, and Microsoft refuses to address the issue even when the big hitter tech journalists directly ask.

      That's a big difference.

    10. Re:Buyer beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your link:

      We have stated publicly that all apps in our Marketplace today will run on the next version of Windows Phone. Beyond that, we have nothing to share about future releases.

      While it's not a confirmation, it's not a denial either.

    11. Re:Buyer beware! by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      ....but iPhone 4 does run iOS 5.

      I am being horribly pedantic here, but for the sake of providing context to this discussion on older phones supporting OS updates, I'd like to point out that the iPhone 3gs also runs iOS5.1. That device was released in 2009, btw.

      seth

    12. Re:Buyer beware! by WolfgangPG · · Score: 1

      Yes and this is exactly why I fully expect all current WP7 devices to be upgraded. I can't imagine Microsoft would want burn the 11 million+ customers they already have.

    13. Re:Buyer beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy one of these "beta test" phones, you will soon be stuck in a multi-
      year contract with a device that will not be upgradable to the current version of
      the OS.

      Sounds like my and too damn many other "beta test" Android phones. I'll never see anything over 2.2.1 unless I void my warranty or buy a new one, only to be stuck in the same way on the new phone.
      I'm not going to include Apple in this, as there is only one maker for the iPhone.

    14. Re:Buyer beware! by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > The telco's on the other hand, have always had Microsoft by the gentlemans parts, and call the shots.

      Not really. It's fun and fashionable to bash Microsoft, but let's not forget that ~7 years ago, while Palm was merrily selling phones with Verizon-mandated lack of bluetooth (among other things), Microsoft winked and hid the key to Verizon's handcuffs in the registry where anyone smart enough to use regedit could unlock all the naughty features Big Red didn't want people to play with.

      Microsoft knew fully well that Verizon would find out about it, but they did it anyway. No, they didn't proclaim that they were going to withhold their phones from Verizon, because they knew that in America, such an announcement would have just screwed the 40% or so of consumers who are stuck with them because it's the only carrier who worked above the 60th floor of their building, or had 3G service out in the middle of BFE, and wouldn't have made the slightest difference to Verizon's practices. They just quietly gave Vzw the finger, made the phone trivially-unlockable, and let them ship.

      The biggest problem with Windows Phone *today* is the fact that you can technically buy your freedom, but writing software that only runs on liberated Windows Phones is basically masturbation, because most people won't be able to run it. It's like giving somebody a Lamborghini with a gallon of gas and a small oval track surrounded by a concrete wall. The worst part is, Microsoft is locking down Windows Phone without even having any clear rationale of its own for doing it, besides "Well, Apple does it, so I guess we should probably do it, too. After all, Gartner Group said it makes users more productive."

    15. Re:Buyer beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cousin said that the Android 4 for Galaxy Note is in beta.

  24. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pretty much everything you just complained about is not true anymore. When they released Mango it allowed for more than just http requests and also the SkyDrive API is quit open. You should give it another gander because things have changed drastically in the last year.

  25. no surprise by smash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wozniak is a nerd's nerd. He isn't the general public, and what woz thinks is awesome is not likely to be what Joe average wants to use. That is not meant to be an insult by the way, the man is a genius. But he's a technical genius and not a genius with regards to what people want (that was Jobs).

    I'd say that getting a glowing review by wozniak is just as likely to be the kiss of death as it is to be the harbinger of iphone doom...

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:no surprise by fermion · · Score: 1
      The thing is with the current Windows Phone, you are dealing with the grand parents of the smartphone category. MS has had a mobile platform for well over 10 years, and has been supply smartphone OS for almost 10. Nokia, the Windows Phone main ally, has been building mobile communications for coming up on 50 years, has had some of the best selling and most beautiful and desirable phones, and in general was the name in advanced mobile technology. They are going to create good kit.

      Which is to say that I agree with you. Is the tech going to translate into sales. Right now Android has a near monopoly on the no contract inexpensive phone. We are talking under $100 to start and $50 a month. Android competes well with Apple in the premium market, but I still see more iPhones. In the US Nokia did not compete with premium phones. It is unclear if Samsung is really dedicated to make the Windows Phone compete. It is questionable, long term, what users are going to get if they buy a WIndows Phone. Of course right now Windows Phones are apparently free. The question is what will happen when the contact runs out.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:no surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's got even more good stuff to say about the iPhone and iPad. Those guys must be really fucked

    3. Re:no surprise by smash · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension: F

      Try again, that wasn't what I suggested. I actually suggested that his opinion is irrelevant as far as the general public goes.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  26. Call me a grump... by mlts · · Score: 2

    When MS bought out the Chevron utility and built it as an option, it made the platform attractive -- no worrying about rooting or jailbreaking. A recent XDA article showed that that functionality is going away soon.

    I wish it weren't the case, but I am tired of locked down platforms, and find Android the one that sucks the least. For example, if I want to block calls/texts with iOS [1], i'm forced to jailbreak. At least with Android, I can use Mr. Number or a root-level blacklist and be done with it.

    What would be ideal would be a system similar to the one used for unlocking Nexus phone bootloaders -- an obstacle that will make Joe Sixpack go "hmm, maybe I shouldn't do this", but for someone who knows their stuff, would be trivial. That way, people who don't know what they are doing are protected by the phone's security and the gatekeeper at the app store, while people who are more interested in customization can do what they want.

    [1]: Yes, there are apps that supposedly do blocking, but a lot of them do nothing except create a new contact entry with [Blocked] in it.

  27. Since 1984... by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    George Colony who blogged that Apple would decline in the post-Jobs era.

    Since day one of the Macintosh, or you might say day one of the IBM PC, people have been predicting the demise of Apple. With every new model and every new OS, legions of entrenched industry analysts stood up and said with certainty..."whoa, this may be the end of Apple".

    I guess if they just keep saying that, one day it will be true and they can pat themselves on the back for being so prescient.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Since 1984... by tgd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      George Colony who blogged that Apple would decline in the post-Jobs era.

      Since day one of the Macintosh, or you might say day one of the IBM PC, people have been predicting the demise of Apple. With every new model and every new OS, legions of entrenched industry analysts stood up and said with certainty..."whoa, this may be the end of Apple".

      I guess if they just keep saying that, one day it will be true and they can pat themselves on the back for being so prescient.

      Well, to be fair, the first post-Jobs era at Apple did almost sink the company. Microsoft, ironically enough, is a big part of the reason Apple made it out of the mid 90's in business. And if you talk to their shareholders now, most of them will tell you that, while the post-Jobs era now has been good from a stock value and revenue standpoint, its been pretty damn concerning from a mid-term to long-term innovation and investment standpoint. Look at the pace of "real" innovation that was happening at Apple for the ten years before Jobs' departure, and look at the pace now. That should have people worried. "Innovation" now is "hype up the technology developed by a company we're suing (Samsung's high-resolution panel)" and "we're in 150 markets". Software innovation is dried up -- they're rolling out largely features that came from Android and WP7, implemented in the jailbroken community, and absorbed much later by Apple.

      Apple and MS have swapped roles now -- Apple is coasting on customer hype and its near monopoly, and Microsoft is the nimble innovator. And as someone who has a lot of stock in both, I have this lingering sense of dread that both companies are going to somehow screw this up.

    2. Re:Since 1984... by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft, ironically enough, is a big part of the reason Apple made it out of the mid 90's in business.

      Microsoft's role is somewhat overblown. The 150 million from MS was to settle a lawsuit and represented 7.5% of Apple's cash reserves at the time.

    3. Re:Since 1984... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's role is somewhat overblown. The 150 million from MS was to settle a lawsuit and represented 7.5% of Apple's cash reserves at the time.

      I remember around 1997 the Apple stock being $2 a share (maybe just under), and sinking. Then Jobs introduced Bill on a 1984-esque big screen to announce Microsoft would be making Office for the Mac. That's when the stock started to climb. Microsoft (more likely Bill Gates personally) saved Apple from dying. I find it amazing what Jobs was able to do with that last breath of life.

    4. Re:Since 1984... by fermat1313 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, ironically enough, is a big part of the reason Apple made it out of the mid 90's in business.

      Microsoft's role is somewhat overblown. The 150 million from MS was to settle a lawsuit and represented 7.5% of Apple's cash reserves at the time.

      Not to speak for GP, but I think it's less about the 150 million as it is about Microsoft's decision to continue to support Office for Mac, even though it helped leach sales away from Windows. Without Office on the Mac in 1995, the decision to buy a Mac in a business environment would have been much harder for businesses to needed to share documents with Office users (which was just about everyone back then).

    5. Re:Since 1984... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft's support for Office on the Apple platform was more important than the 150 million.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:Since 1984... by toriver · · Score: 1

      The first post-Jobs era did not have Jonathan Ive, chief designer of most of what Apple sells today, nor did it have Tim Cook, father of the Apple Store. Apple will do quite nicely without Steve Jobs because of those two.

    7. Re:Since 1984... by toriver · · Score: 1

      At the time, Apple had $1.2 billion in reserves. Unless the low stock price could have led to a hostile takeover, the market cap was not a factor. Apple would have survived without what in effect was a fine for illegally copying Quicktime code.

    8. Re:Since 1984... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, came with a commitment to continue developing Office product for Mac concurrent with its Wintel sibling.

    9. Re:Since 1984... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a different argument this time around. As I wrote earlier, Steve's passing means that his specific attention to detail and his demanding spirit is gone. Despite the number of designers working on Apple products, it was Steve Jobs who brought Apple back and Steve Jobs who had kept Apple on top with beautiful, functional products. Apple will likely remain a market leader, but at this point, it's all about asking what would Steve do, and then trying to copy that. I've been noticing Steve's absence from various Apple products lately: the light on the Airport Extreme, Apple TV's software interface, etc. On a long enough time scale, Apple will probably slip back and start blending in with the various Japanese, Korean,and Taiwanese companies that had copied it. It reminds me of the current state of BMW. The 3-series and 5-series today gets lost in the mix of Korean and Japanese luxury sport sedans that aspired to be more BMW like. Apple made packaging an extension of origami. Now a lot of companies are doing it. Asus' Transformer Prime is worthy of YouTube unboxing videos. Without new vision, Apple will just tread on doing what its doing as other companies become more Apple-like.

    10. Re:Since 1984... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Without Office on the Mac in 1995, the decision to buy a Mac in a business environment would have been much harder for businesses to needed to share documents with Office users (which was just about everyone back then).

      True, but you could say the same thing for Adobe, yet we don't see comments about how "Adobe saved Apple in the nineties". That and Microsoft makes a few hundred million from Mac Office sales, so it would have been silly to cut a cash cow, as well as a deterrence against anti-trust action from the DOJ.

    11. Re:Since 1984... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Microsoft (more likely Bill Gates personally) saved Apple from dying.

      Not so much.

    12. Re:Since 1984... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Colony who blogged that Apple would decline in the post-Jobs era.

      Since day one of the Macintosh, or you might say day one of the IBM PC, people have been predicting the demise of Apple. With every new model and every new OS, legions of entrenched industry analysts stood up and said with certainty..."whoa, this may be the end of Apple".

      I guess if they just keep saying that, one day it will be true and they can pat themselves on the back for being so prescient.

      Well, to be fair, the first post-Jobs era at Apple did almost sink the company. Microsoft, ironically enough, is a big part of the reason Apple made it out of the mid 90's in business. And if you talk to their shareholders now, most of them will tell you that, while the post-Jobs era now has been good from a stock value and revenue standpoint, its been pretty damn concerning from a mid-term to long-term innovation and investment standpoint. Look at the pace of "real" innovation that was happening at Apple for the ten years before Jobs' departure, and look at the pace now. That should have people worried. "Innovation" now is "hype up the technology developed by a company we're suing (Samsung's high-resolution panel)" and "we're in 150 markets". Software innovation is dried up -- they're rolling out largely features that came from Android and WP7, implemented in the jailbroken community, and absorbed much later by Apple.

      Apple and MS have swapped roles now -- Apple is coasting on customer hype and its near monopoly, and Microsoft is the nimble innovator. And as someone who has a lot of stock in both, I have this lingering sense of dread that both companies are going to somehow screw this up.

      What are you talking about? Jobs had failed to bankrupt the company two times before so the board got rid of him before he could succeed. He did manage to bankrupt NeXT though.

      Absorbing stuff is Apple's way they got Long file names from Dos and other of "their" innovations from OS/2.

    13. Re:Since 1984... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the PowerPC version of NT... or more precisely, Microsoft's decision to quietly pull it right at the moment when 90% of the world's Mac owners would have happily jumped ship, installed it over MacOS, and never looked back.

    14. Re:Since 1984... by chrb · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's role is somewhat overblown. The 150 million from MS was to settle a lawsuit and represented 7.5% of Apple's cash reserves at the time.

      And what about Office? Could Apple really have continued to have a viable desktop OS without Office?

      "Bill Gates was threatening with the cancellation of Office for the Mac. [2] [3] In August 1997, Apple and Microsoft announced a settlement deal. Apple would drop all current lawsuits, including all lingering issues from the "Look & Feel" lawsuit and the "QuickTime source code" lawsuit, and agree to make Internet Explorer the default browser on the Macintosh unless the user explicitly chose the bundled Netscape browser. In return, Microsoft agreed to continue developing Office, Internet Explorer, and various developer tools and software for the Mac for the next 5 years, and purchase $150 million of non-voting Apple stock."

    15. Re:Since 1984... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Right. Just like use of OS X has dropped to nothing since Boot Camp came out and you can install Windows natively.......

    16. Re:Since 1984... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Colony who blogged that Apple would decline in the post-Jobs era.

      Since day one of the Macintosh, or you might say day one of the IBM PC, people have been predicting the demise of Apple. With every new model and every new OS, legions of entrenched industry analysts stood up and said with certainty..."whoa, this may be the end of Apple".

      I guess if they just keep saying that, one day it will be true and they can pat themselves on the back for being so prescient.

      I think it's pretty much inevitable now that Apple will decline, simply because Apple is the most valuable company in the world. It may hold that position for a century or three, but when you're #1, there's nowhere to go but down. It's a pretty safe bet.

  28. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    I don't think the app count is the issue, there are a lot of apps.

    The app usefulness is the issue - the API, is at bast, extremely lacking in a lot of areas. There are some modern things that are very useful for apps, that just can't be done effectively with it. Outside of single player games, and some trivial stuff, there's not much interesting, in a modern sense, that you can do effectively with it.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  29. Re:Windows Phone 7 by catmistake · · Score: 1

    It's true, too. Windows Phone 7 UI is beautiful and even better than iPhone's, not to mention Android. Microsoft really outdid themselves with that.

    In the turbid angry seas of opinion, personal choice, and inclination, its always refreshing to finally find some cold hard incontrovertable, academically provable, undeniable truth in a slashdot comment, without all the irrelivant and superfluous mucky muck editorial.

  30. Re:Windows Phone 7 by redbeardcanada · · Score: 1

    Or restrict first posts to only say "First!", like we always used to do...

  31. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a difference between the UI and the OS.

    Even if the WP7 UI is better it doesn't make it a better phone if the underlying OS is still a POS.

    We need the stability and features of iOS, the openness of Android and the interface of WP7!

    Acronyms are fun!

  32. Re:Windows Phone 7 by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look, just because his name is similar to other first-posting newly created account names accused of being MS shills (TechNY/TechLA), the account was created just yesterday and he only made pro-MS and anti-Google postings since then doesn't mean anything. Doesn't mean anything at all ...

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  33. Upgrade path to WP8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand that none of the current phones can be upgraded to WP8 when it is released.

    If this is true then what is the point of anyone buying any of the current phones at the moment?

    If Microsoft were really, really serious about phones then they wouldn't restrict their hardware like they seem to want to do.

    Even Apple with its Walled Garden upgrade two year old phones to the latest version of IOS.

  34. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    In Internet time, two days ago is like two centuries! ...wait a minute, we didn't even have computers and internet two centuries ago!!

    TechCar is an alien visiting from the future!!!

  35. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was given a Windows phone (older Samsung) at a conference to "eval". It does seem nice and all, but there aren't any apps for it yet. Things like - Google Voice - which is a must for me just aren't there. (And no, using the web page to make calls is not a workaround - it is a joke.) So instead of switching to the Windows phone for a bit, I thought I'd just activate it as a second phone for a couple of months. Verizon wanted a minimum of $60 a month more for me to just have a phone to play around with. And that was if I changed my plan (which would cancel my current unlimited data). If I stayed on my current plan they wanted $70 more a month. It just wasn't worth it. But I've played with the features of the phone over WiFi and it seems very nice. Without apps though not too many people will want it.

  36. How can anyone like metro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word "Ugly".

    Color scheme is right out of Hot Dog On a Stick. Icons look like my 3 year old drew them. If that is what is facing me every time I use my phone I think I'd be sick.

    Granted Apple's icons are more polished, but the usability of iOS leaves much to be desired, they really need to redesign the flow and usability. Same with Android.

    I'm not sure anyone is doing it right so far. HP WebOS was starting to look and feel promising, but we all know how that worked out.

    Oh well, I'll just deal with these cruddy UI's until these companies actually do some usability studies before releasing garbage.

    1. Re:How can anyone like metro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The WP app launcher is just a plain list of icons. Ok, you can't do much with an app launcher, but "beautiful"? Really? The Woz should have tried an N9 if he wanted to see what an actual innovative phone looks like.

  37. And you people decided to stir by Ranger · · Score: 0, Troll

    the shit by posting this article. What are you a sophomore high school tabloid? Why, yes. As a matter of fact you are.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  38. it's been little more than a decade by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    people seem to have forgotten the old days, which may well be back now that Jobs is gone -- " Apple computer, proudly going out of business since 1977 "

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  39. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah and like 3-4 of them are raving about some sort of MS product, dissing Linux or dissing Google.

  40. Re:Windows Phone 7 by redbeardcanada · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I played with it too, and it did feel like an early release product.

    It was interesting enough though that I would consider it in a year or so. What would make the difference for me will be how they handle integration with MS Office (and OneNote); if this is seamless and intuitive this would make a good business phone. The iPhone (my current phone) is great for everything else I do, but still seems forced whenever it needs to interact with Exchange, and Safari doesn't seem to handle SharePoint sites well (although this is not likely Apples fault). Android also seems to have this issue, and it was non-existent on my BB.

    So I'll wait and see...

  41. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wow, that's some pretty horrible justifications there.

  42. Out of sincerety? I think not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's left unsaid is often as important as that which was uttered aloud. Windows Phone being the most beatiful, and iOS having the most apps leaves Android not being special in any significant way, which I think Woz was aiming at, all along.

    I still think Harmattan is the fairest of them all.

  43. Sad, too, he's assumed to be an Apple mouthpiece.. by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just because Woz originally helped found Apple Computer in the 70's doesn't mean he's a shill for Apple 30 years later, long after having worked as one of their employees, and after the company changed names (simply "Apple" today -- with the "Computer" part purposely deleted).

    I really do think the man speaks honestly about technology he uses, no matter which vendor it comes from. He often likes Apple's products, and when he does, he'll tell you so. But the media seems to assume he's "supposed to be saying that" and jumps to conclusions whenever he says something good about a competing product instead.

    As a big fan of the iPhone myself, I'd agree with Woz about Windows Phone 7 too. It *does* have a refreshing and attractive-looking UI to it -- something I'm doubly impressed came out of Microsoft, after their LONG standing belief that everything they designed should have a START button in the corner. (Even their embedded systems for such things as vehicle navigation systems still required developers to purposely code the software to completely hide the OS's UI underneath, because nobody wanted a touchscreen in their car or truck to look like it was just another PC running a version of Windows, with icons to double-click.)

  44. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, to be more fair, he almost certainly has a shitload more posts than that going back for quite a bit longer, just spread between a few dozen accounts.

  45. Re:Windows Phone 7 by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

    Yes, because anecdotal evidence tends to be more true.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  46. That's one of the things I like about Woz by Lucas123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He's not an Apple fanboy. He just likes good technology regardless of who makes it.

    --
    The mill's closed. There's no more work. We're destitute. I've got no option but to sell you all for scientific experiments.

  47. Re:Windows Phone 7 by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Quality phones?
    When are they going to get 720p displays? I upgraded from 800x480 and I would never go back.

    Not that windows phone is for me anyway. I am not going to be locked into one market and no real ROM scene since there is no source available.

  48. Re:Windows Phone 7 by CowTipperGore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TechCar is the latest iteration of a large group of astroturfing accounts. There's a bunch of high UID accounts with similar style names (two random words smashed together) that shill pro-Microsoft and anti-Google positions. Unsurprisingly, he was born yesterday to post in Bonch's story claiming Google management knew about the wifi harvesting. He shows up to defend a well-established anti-Google (and pro-Apple) shill and has since posted a series of anti-Linux, anti-Google, and pro-Microsoft comments.

    Assuming he follows the same pattern as the rest, mods will catch on in a week or two and his karma will plummet. The account will get put to sleep and a new one will be created.

  49. Re:Windows Phone 7 by localman57 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, because anecdotal evidence tends to be more true.

    I've found that to be true in my personal experience.

  50. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Shompol · · Score: 1, Informative

    My relative got W7 phone as her first smartphone. During contact export from SIM card some phone numbers got reattached to wrong contacts. This is exactly what I told her: it is new, raw and un-patched, you bought it at your own risk.

  51. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How about growing up, and just ignoring things that bother you on the internet?

    It's not like the 50th, 100th, 200th post is insightful. This is slashdot.

    They now have a BI section. They think that has to do with nerds and technology.

    It is the worst of "IT World", and the worst of fark. The trolls are the only thing I find enjoyable about the site anymore.

  52. Re:Windows Phone 7 by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    HTTP is not a replacement for every other protocol. I am sick of the brain dead thinking it is. We have other protocols for a reason.

    As a simple example, http sure is not enough for an ftp client, ssh client, etc, etc, etc. 7.5 of course will let you do all these things.

  53. Quality is irrelevant by captain_sweatpants · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It really doesn't matter how good (or not) Windows phone are:

    1. The intersection of MS fanboys and people with widespread credibility is exactly 0.
    2. Nobody (apart from MS employees and shareholders) wants it to succeed. - Most people who care about tech gear want MS products to fail so the company will die and be replaced by several other, better companies.
    3. We all want competition, good products, and good value, but nobody associates any of those things with microsoft. We all reasonably expect competitors products to be at least as good and better value.
    4. We'll happily take an apple/google duopoly over another MS monopoly anyday.

    So unless the phones are both outstanding compared to the competition, and much better value, nobody is going to care about them. This seems unlikely.

    If MS wants people to care about it's brands and products, it needs to split itself up into it's various divisions. Smaller, independent businesses would be forced to compete and innovate instead of relying on marketing and monopoly to ensure success. If WP7 became a genuine underdog, it might actually get some credible supporters. But since this won't ever happen, it will simply die a long, painful and expensive death. So props to MS on the strategy so far.

    1. Re:Quality is irrelevant by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      2. Nobody (apart from MS employees and shareholders) wants it to succeed.

      I want it to succeed. Why? More options = better. If they open it up, I want it to succeed even more.

      I don't like Microsoft, but as long as they are not overwhelmingly dominant, they are no worse than Apple or IBM.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Quality is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's all this "we" garbage you're spouting? Who do you think you speak for? Every big company does dastardly things, yet I bet you still own Sony Products, eat McDonalds, and carry an iPhone or use Google products.

    3. Re:Quality is irrelevant by captain_sweatpants · · Score: 1

      I want it to succeed. Why? More options = better. If they open it up, I want it to succeed even more.

      Sure. You want say 10-15% of other people to buy it. Small enough to market share to prevent MS from engaging in their usual tricks, but big enough to create some competition. But you aren't interested in it yourself. You wouldn't actually recommend it to your friends or family. So who the hell is going to buy actually buy it?

    4. Re:Quality is irrelevant by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I own an old-fashioned feature-phone, but I like playing with all kinds. I hope Rim makes it too, but I doubt they will.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Quality is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own an old-fashioned feature-phone, but I like playing with all kinds.

      Please shut up. The adults are speaking now.

    6. Re:Quality is irrelevant by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      So you want more competition, but want Microsoft to die. Sorry about your broken logic.

      4. We'll happily take an apple/google duopoly over another MS monopoly anyday.

      No "we" won't. Or is that the royal "we"?

    7. Re:Quality is irrelevant by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

      Your post is full of fail. You want Microsoft to die, at least you're honest about it but it highlights everything that's wrong with the slashdot crowd - blind religious beliefs parroted over and over again for anything that's anti-Microsoft that don't have much place in the real world.
      The reality is people pay Microsoft large amounts of cash for their software; it might not be the best for every situation ever, but there's a lot of value there too. Oh no wait, sorry, I'm wrong - you're clearly much smarter than every paying customer....it actually all sucks and it must all go away. My bad.

      --
      throw new NoSignatureException();
    8. Re:Quality is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want it to succeed. Why? More options = better.

      That's like saying that nazism should be a political option because more options = better.

      I don't like Microsoft, but as long as they are not overwhelmingly dominant, they are no worse than Apple or IBM.

      That's like saying that you don't like Nazis, but as long as the Nazis are not overwelmingly dominant they are no worse than the rest.

    9. Re:Quality is irrelevant by daniel78 · · Score: 1

      I think your post might be seen as unnecessarily anti-microsoft, but i agree with much of what you wrote.

      Microsoft as a brand isn't "cool" - probably never will be (Again? was it ever?). Just look at Apple for seeing how valuable this can be.

      I suspect that, even if most "regular" people aren't actively anti-MS, then at the very least they just don't care. The only MS product i see people getting excited about is Xbox. Google and Apple release new things all the time, and people are interested to see what they'll do next. MS? Err... Office2013 anyone?

      The nerdy, tech crowd (who's opinions are all over the web) generally have little goodwill left for MS. Rightly or wrongly, there *is* anti-MS sentiment. Some may think this is stupid, but its common.

      I think this combination of factors is why MS has pretty much failed spectacularly at every consumer directed product released in recent history (XBox360 excluded, though even that may be down to, in large part, Sony's own failings with Playstation)

    10. Re:Quality is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shhh your spoiling his 'I think this, so that means everyone' vibe...

      If MS made crap product guess what people will not buy it. Take for example the xbox. People buy 2-3 of them (even though I would argue they are crap product). They want it THAT bad. So people do not think it is crap. They like it that much. Name one other product out there where people will go back and buy another. Even though the last one just broke and the new one is exactly the same. There are not many (iPhone being one of them). MS makes lots of stuff. Much of it good (many misses too, even apple has had it share of those).

      I personally usually do not buy apple products (even though I can respect that they are good products, I have my reasons). The gp is just one of those 'if you buy something it should ONLY be one company everyone else is garbage'. He is just a user who has not been burned by Apple yet (he will be).

      IBM has pretty much reinvented itself into a consulting company. I do not see them as a hardware influence for much longer.

    11. Re:Quality is irrelevant by codepunk · · Score: 1

      They are irrelevant already in my life, job etc as long as it stays that way I am a happy man.

      --


      Got Code?
    12. Re:Quality is irrelevant by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Lol at the neckbeard brigade analysis. Thanks for that...

    13. Re:Quality is irrelevant by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Meh. If you're a software developer who has used and understands MS's development tools, you still think MS is "cool". The rest of you just don't know what you're talking about.

    14. Re:Quality is irrelevant by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      More options = better.

      Only in the minds of people who have swallowed the capitalism BS hook, line, and sinker.

      While it may be a niche, there's a reason Trader Joes does so well with what is basically providing approx the same number of things, but fewer brands per thing, as a large clusterfark of a grocery store. Competition does not mean better per se - in fact, it could mean nothing more than the mess we have now, where a corporation has to continuously drop their costs and improve their profit margin, all the while convincing you via marketting that their product is superior to all the other 5,000,000 products exactly like it. If instead we could maximize efficiencies of distribution, manufacturing, and design by focusing on just a very few brands for a particular product, then that product would actually improve.

      Android's biggest problem has always been the splintered, fractured distribution of the platform. All those options...the AT&T version, the Verison version, etc - all have to twist the crap around for marketing reasons - causing new bugs and problems. Can have the same phone with two different carriers, same version of android, but the images be entirely different. That's "more options" for ya. Diversity of brands just for the sake of diversity is fail.

    15. Re:Quality is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, your fanboi is showing.

      I currently develop games for Android and iOS. I own an Android device. I'm seriously considering a WP8 device for my next phone. Your list is so smacking your mouth frothing hatred for MS that it shows how completely pointless your opinion is.

    16. Re:Quality is irrelevant by daniel78 · · Score: 1

      Actually, i think development tools/technologies is something that MS *is* good at (Even though, in an increasingly non-Windows dominated world, lack of portability pretty much ensures that i don't use most of them) For what it's worth, VS is still the best IDE out there (imho).

      But none of that matters to consumers who just see Windows, Office, and a string of underwhelming products like Zune, Kin, Bing, and IE.

      I was simply reiterating the point that MS, as a brand, doesn't appeal to consumers, so MS products aimed at those same consumers, have little chance of success.

    17. Re:Quality is irrelevant by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why you are whining about capitalism. It's irrelevant.

      More options = more things for me to play with. For me it's not about optimizing market value or something like that. It's about my own selfish entertainment. If you can't understand that, please go away.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    18. Re:Quality is irrelevant by bosah · · Score: 1

      Microsoft as a brand isn't "cool" - probably never will be (Again? was it ever?).

      Yes, it was once. Because it wasn't IBM.

  54. Re:Windows Phone 7 by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

    secure data transmission. Assuming Http is the only thing allowed that would mean https is not allowed.

  55. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just the first thing that pops into my head... SSH?

    Unless you're going with the notion that everyone should rent a VPS and run their own IP-over-HTTP tunnel through it, which somehow seems unlikely to go well with the mass-market...

  56. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow all those posts about TechNY / Bonch / Tech** being an utter shill werent jokes. You really are the biggest shill in the world.

    How much are they paying you to do this? Have you ever criticized anything MS, or complimented anything Apple or Google? How many sites do you troll, looking for opportunities to drop your poison comments on?

    Posting anon so I can mod your comment appropriately.

  57. Just wait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Until people start getting a BSOD while calling 911.

  58. Re:Windows Phone 7 by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Hey! "Indestructible" is a quality.

  59. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 2

    And thus completes the circle of life...cue Elton John!

    --
    "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
  60. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And besides HTTP, what do you see it needing? What can't be done with HTTP?

    What are you babbling about? Come, come, elucidate!

    For example, I have security cameras at home. I cannot access them via port 80 due to my ISP, I must access them via a different port that I "port forward". I could still access via the browser, but not the app, I would assume, but the app is nicer than the browser interface. But that's just me, not the person you are talking to...

  61. Re:Windows Phone 7 by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    Hey! "Indestructible" is a quality.

    Yes... and it's one Nokia phones lack.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  62. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is the overall stability? With my android phone running Samsung/AT&T OEM Android Gingerbread I suffer about three hard lock-ups a week requiring a battery pull to reset the system. I hate it. A factory restore a month ago made things better for a while but I'm back to lockups again. I just disabled Javascript in the browser, hopefully that'll help. I use the phone for light to moderate web browsing, text messaging a lot and making phone calls. It seems like it can't handle a lot of fast app switching and fast switching from standby to on and back. Or maybe the user input queue gets hosed. It locks up a lot when I get a key bounce on the "on" button and double stroke it by accident.

  63. Re:Windows Phone 7 by afidel · · Score: 1

    Sure HTTP/S can replace ftp, even SCP, and there are plenty of implementations of the common uses for an SSH client that use HTTP/S. The biggest problem is if you are trying to connect to a service that you don't control, in that case you'll need clients designed for a specific protocol which would make things difficult with a locked down phone platform.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  64. Re:Windows Phone 7 by nschubach · · Score: 2

    The astroturfing and that song have a few things in common... one of which is irritation. It's pretty sad how Slashdot is getting "gamed" so easily by this group. (I seriously don't think it's just one person...)

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  65. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my first thought was Gary Oldman

  66. Hologram by arunce · · Score: 1

    In 48 months there will be a Steve Jobs hologram.

    1. Re:Hologram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all read the article.

  67. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Your complaint is hardly specific to Windows Phone 7 tho - I've not used it (consider that a caveat) so I can't comment on WP7, but I've had my fair share of UI glitches and software slide buttons sticking on both Android (HTC Desire, 2.1 iirc) and iPhone.

    I've even had situations where the iPhone wont let me answer a call thats ringing, because the screen isnt responding to the slide - the call goes to voice mail, the screen reverts back to the lock screen, and suddenly everything works again.

    I've had situations where I couldn't hang up the call on both the iPhone and Android. Now thats not a great situation to be in!

    My iPhone also won't connect to my local pubs wifi, even when Im sat a couple of meters away from the router - won't see it, and if I try and connect manually it won't join the network.

    So execution is really lacking all round.

  68. Re:Windows Phone 7 by shugah · · Score: 1

    I'm sure both other WP7 customers share your impressions.

    --
    If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
  69. Re:Windows Phone 7 by FreelanceWizard · · Score: 1

    The SkyDrive and other Live APIs are indeed opened -- for Windows Phone, iOS, Android, and Windows.

    --
    The Freelance Wizard
  70. Re:Windows Phone 7 by PoliTech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you actually mean to say that you think Steve Wozniak is a paid Microsoft Shill? (Not to mention a clueless moron?) Or did you just fail to proofread your trolling?

  71. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, that is some pretty blatant Microsoft bashing there.

  72. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Look, just because his name is similar to other first-posting newly created account names accused of being MS shills (TechNY/TechLA), the account was created just yesterday and he only made pro-MS and anti-Google postings since then doesn't mean anything. Doesn't mean anything at all ...

    The question is whether this behaviour is actually shilling, or just a troll wanting to wind people up by making them think he's shilling (badly). I suspect the latter.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  73. Re:Windows Phone 7 by DrXym · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    WP7 phones do look very sleek and if you were new to smart phones you'd probably be enthralled by all the fancy graphics and whizzy effects. However if you come from Android land you'd quickly find it superficial. Android allows interactive widgets, folders, shortcuts to apps and users, multiple desktops, interactive wallpapers and all the rest. You can even customize which app you use for browsing, dialling, inputting characters and pretty much anything if you wish. It does all this from a simple attractive user interface.

    Windows Phone is a pale imitation by comparison. You get tiles, some which show non-interactive information and you can rearrange them in a vertical list. Oh and set your screensaver wallpaper. Otherwise what you get is what you're given with little other customization possible.

    It's pretty weak and reflects the OS as a whole. It's probably fine if you don't know any better but if you do then the flaws become apparent very quickly.

  74. Re:Windows Phone 7 by MrHanky · · Score: 1

    I have to laugh at the fanboys who modded this down.

  75. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Tawnos · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that the people doing the first post prepared in advance are just trolls stepping up their game.

  76. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Megor1 · · Score: 1

    Apple Shill

    --
    Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
  77. Re:Windows Phone 7 by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    No, it cannot. You might use it that way and you might think it is a good thing to do, but that does not make it so.

    The biggest problem is that is not what it was designed to do. No different than people who think emailing files around is a good way to transport them. Which is what happens when you don't know that email BASE64 encodes everything since it was only designed to really deal with ASCII text.

  78. Re:Windows Phone 7 by wed128 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Windows phone 7 is full of interesting and good ideas with poor execution and little polish.

    Sounds like every Microsoft product ever.

  79. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh look - more anti-MS shilling here on Slashdot.

  80. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Dishevel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And you can't blame the phone OS if the store can't make their WiFi and phones work together

    Umm.
    Yes. You can. In almost all cases. If the store Wifi is working and everyone else can get on and that phone can not, What exactly is to blame?

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  81. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Megor1 · · Score: 1

    So reading this I went hrmmm that seems dumb like how could Skype work over http? (I'm sure it could but that would be really weird), quick google search shows it has full sockets support http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh202874(v=vs.92).aspx

    --
    Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
  82. Re:Windows Phone 7 by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple's co-founder Steve Wozniak

    Sadly, most Apple fans these days don't consider Steve Wozniak the co-founder of Apple. They think Steve Jobs said "Let there be light" and then created everything Apple by himself. And I wish I were joking.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  83. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a reason, Woz has been an engineer and not a designer at Apple.

    Yeah - he actually invented things instead of putting pretty packages and a neat UI on existing things and marketing the hell out of them. He had the audacity to put function over form.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  84. Re:Windows Phone 7 - Another Astroturf Submission by Jeng · · Score: 1

    So, do you work for /. or do you pay them for them to post your story submissions?

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  85. Re:Windows Phone 7 by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    meh, the shilling works backwards when it's done so poorly. it's a good question though who the fuck has time for that. and if they really wanted to really, really shill why the fuck don't they just create a regular account, post some random geeky stuff and info relevant to articles, get excellent karma and just disrespected whatever company they want all day long while not having to create a new account every now and then since the karma is sitting steadily at excellent.

    fucking weirdos man.

    wp isn't pad for a remote control ui, for a pda ui it sucks balls, for complex ui's sticking to the ui paradigms really blows - for really simple stuff it's sort of ok, the only good thing about it is that it doesn't pretend to be a real alarm clock look, doesn't pretend to display real pages, real toggles etc stuff. but technically the released stuff is still pretty much just "hey let's slap a phone soc on a zune and call it a day" and the smartphone programmable extendability features are certainly lacking, which makes managing the wifi and some other things a real pain and you can't get a 3rd party program to do the thing you need often done with one click.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  86. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 4, Informative

    And out of his eight posts, four are negative of Google, one is negative of Linux, and three are positive about Microsoft.

  87. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using my WP7/HTC for just about a year and love it.
    Connection with Office works perfectly, Wifi everywhere I have tried it works, BT integrates with my GPS for hands free phone and even allows my GPS to read text messages.
    Interface is simple and effective.
    Camera is quite good and integration for uploading pics to places like Facebook is effortless.
    Zune does suck though and I really wish a straight connection to PC was part of the package. (I don't like my iTunes/iPad connection any better)
    Apps are a bit sparse for WP7 but really, who needs some of the ones out there anyway. The ones I do have are quite useful.
    All in all it "just works"
    MTCW

  88. "Kind of online argument you'd expect" by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

    This is the kind of online argument I'd expect:
    A: This is a superior product, because XYZ.
    B: But it's inferior because other products have KLM, which is better than XYZ.
    A: Whaddaya mean, XYZ rocks, KLM sucks!
    B: Your product sucks!
    A: Well, yeah ... you're a stinky poopy-face!
    B: I'm not, but yo momma is!
    A: B is totally like Hitler!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  89. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously we cannot all be as enlightened as the iPhone lemmings. Its statistically impossible. :)

  90. Re:Windows Phone 7 by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    fuck online storage(for which there are api's), give a _proper_ local storage.

    as far as phone stuff goes, the api is missing all the fun stuff. might just as well be coding for a zune.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  91. Re:Windows Phone 7 by afidel · · Score: 1

    Um, wow what a worthless response. The fact is that the real world has found plenty of ways to make HTTP do what many other protocols do which makes life easier for everyone since HTTP works without an end to end model which is increasingly not feasible in the real world.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  92. Re:Windows Phone 7 by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    As to the story: There's a reason, Woz has been an engineer and not a designer at Apple.

    So, then, you're saying his opinion is related to usability instead of aesthetics?

    Works for me - I've always felt that form should follow function, not vice versa... which is exactly why I have never owned a single Apple product. Not to say they're unusable, but it's obvious to me that Apple is more concerned with their company image and style than actually making their products better.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  93. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Lousifer · · Score: 1

    'Nokia' and 'quality' should not be put in the same sentence.

    Poor quality is still quality.

  94. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    I had the same with a Samsung Android on Sprint - having toyed with and heard of a few others, I'm inclined to blame Samsung.

    This is an HTC, and it has crashed once in the year that I've had it. Which is more than I'd like, but tolerable.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  95. Re:Windows Phone 7 by inode_buddha · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Yeah, I played with it too, and it did feel like an early release product."

    You mean it came early? Eeewww.

    --
    C|N>K
  96. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are assuming it is working with all of the others.

    Also, you are assuming the issue isn't with the driver or hardware (which would be the manufacturer of the phone, and not the OS).

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  97. Re:Windows Phone 7 by nschubach · · Score: 2

    SEO/Reputation Management firms pay people to do this shit. I actually personally know someone who does this for a living ("Work from home" jobs) and I expressed my distaste for the acts to them several times. I eventually just stopped talking to them altogether.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  98. Re:Windows Phone 7 by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

    Correct, and the best of them are reviewed here.

  99. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    Cross talk between applications. Talking with servers that would be better suited with a persistent connection?

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  100. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Dishevel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Windows did it.
    We all know it.
    If Windows is anywhere near the scene of the crime, "Windows Did It."
    Have we learned nothing?
    The last good OS from Microsoft Was DOS 6.22. If you replaced command.com with 4dos.com.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  101. Re:Windows Phone 7 by gman003 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Current ones, maybe. You could cast one of the old Nokias (the old, phone-shaped ones) into Mt. Doom and it would still work (although I bet Mordor gets pretty bad reception).

  102. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    HTTPS tends to be available in APIs that supply HTTP...

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  103. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    OK, last I saw, since MS didn't have their API available on the phone, you couldn't use it, even if you wrote your own code to handle it. Guess I'm outdated on that.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  104. Perfect statement for the boardroom ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    He gives his honest opinion, saying what he believes to be true. There is no place for this sort of thing in the boardroom.

    Actually this sort of thing is perfect for the boardroom, and it is something a person with the heart and soul of a salesman is likely to say at that level. The difference is that such a person would not say such a thing in public, only the privacy of the boardroom.

    There are plenty of dysfunctional board members but not all are so. This is exactly the reason you have expert who are not competitors on your board.

  105. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wish I knew how to get my beak wet on this. I have a WP7 phone that I simply adore and I'd love to get paid to say nice things about it. Maybe Tech* can hook me up?

  106. Re:Windows Phone 7 by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

    usually but not always. Always make sure. Been burned by that in the past.

  107. Re:Windows Phone 7 by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    There were job openings for skype developers specifically on Windows Phone prior to MSs acquisition of Skype. I think it is safe to assume that Skype, therefore, is not limited to the restriction of 3rd party APIs...

    However, the sockets support is an interesting, new thing. I haven't actually played around with it since last fall. It looked like there were no plans on progressing on the 'network sockets' front. I'm glad this has changed. It's one of the big reasons I gave up on writing anything for the platform.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  108. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Guignol · · Score: 1

    Oh man that was great I so want to buy one now but you forgot the social loot link at the end of the post, that's too bad

  109. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Two posts out of 8 for Tech Car state the following:

    I'm a big fan of Google's products, I use gmail and my Android phone every day (even develop for it), but even I think this is scary and completely unacceptable. Just because its Google it doesn't make it right.

    This is also one of the reasons I would never trust Google or their services.

    It's nice that the shill can't even keep his story straight for two days.

  110. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Rasperin · · Score: 2

    Hey, I think the XNA API is rather nice (far superior to ObjC), plus there is a nice converting library for it called ExEn http://andrewrussell.net/exen/ . I'm a Java developer by history so I have a natural affinity for the Android API, but I think Microsoft did a great job with the API.

    The issue I ran into using the windows mobile phones is that the one sprint offers doesn't support 4g, has a small screen, and is rather bad hardware all around. I'm waiting for one that is like my galaxy s2 then I will probably pick it up.

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  111. Re:Windows Phone 7 by greg1104 · · Score: 1

    Reminds me more of the South Park Circle of Poo

  112. Heresy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs is rolling in his grave!

  113. My 3 weeks with Lumia by kerneloops · · Score: 3, Informative

    I purchased a Lumia 900 on 4/8. Previous phones include Nokia N900 (still "running" MeeGo...) and HTC G2. So far the Lumia experience has been good. Pros: - Fluid, smooth and intuitive UI - Majority of everyday apps I use are native MS/Nokia, or good quality 3rd party (UC Browser, Nav, Google Voice, social networking, email, music player) - Excellent Nokia Drive navigation, probably best nav app I've used. Very quick GPS lock, nice UI while driving, good voice navigation - Good battery life. 16 hours of moderate/heavy use (not always on LTE though), with still juice left. - For me the home screen tiles work. IMO they are a nice compromise between an icon and widget, obviously this boils down to preference. Then again, if you load up your home screen with tiles, you've effectively made your home screen an app menu, just with super large icons... - Display works well in daylight - VKB is ok. Pretty quick swapping from portrait to landscape mode, but like with any touch keys, nothing beats the real keyboard. Pleased to find my native language as a quick switch option while typing. - LTE speeds so far have been good (7-8 mbps download in West L.A.; good/great 4G-speeds in Miami) - "Multitasking". Obviously nowhere near what the N900 offered, but in my daily use I find it similar to Android. - Last but not least, though this one seems to be an ignored feature of a modern smartphone: fantastic call quality -- mind you this on AT&T's famously shitty network. Cons: - Browser options (for now): IE9 is ok, not great, but I'd like to see Firefox and Opera Mobile as options. UC Browser as an IE9 variant offers some welcomed tweaks. - App menu: minor gripe in my use, but if you load your device with apps, the single file scrolling can become a real nuisance. Not that I found Android's App Drawer with 4-5 pages (or a cube/wheel/cylinder...) that much better. I use the KISS principle, worked on Android, works on WP7. - Battery (no percentage) and time displayed only on main screen, not when in app menu. - Display: while it works well outdoors, the screen res. does show its numbers, especially while browsing. Pixellation is apparent on the browser while zoomed out, after you pinch zoom in the text/font looks ok -- for some reason I'd think this would be the other way around. - Camera: Not bad, but not excellent either. It seems like my N900 takes as good pictures as Lumia 900, though this is subjective as I am not a photo-pro. So, the cam is a minor disappointment. - Integration with Zune. Only reason I've used Zune was to do a firmware upgrade. But, signing up with Microsoft/Apple, you kinda know that this is the shit you have to put up with. - Lack of specific apps. I haven't found an app yet that I couldn't live without -- i.e. I've modified my phone usage, like I had to do with the N900 -- but Android app market makes life much more fun if you have the time and energy to read about, test, and install/uninstall apps. - The non-upgradeability to WP8. This one's going to bring some suckage. Though I have to admit, I wasn't even thinking about it when I bought the Lumia 900 (ok, so I got a refund for the purchase price, thanks Nokia!). So I guess I shouldn't complain after all. And it's not like my 2-yr old G2 was getting any love from HTC/T-Mo (ICS Beta on it, ran like, a beta...). I have no idea how the app devel process varies between WP7, Android and iOS, but from an enduser, albeit not a superuser, experience, IMO Lumia 900 works well. I've dumbed down my device requirements, but so far I'm liking it. When I want to dig into an OS, I'll just continue tweaking my Arch with OpenBox :)

    1. Re:My 3 weeks with Lumia by kerneloops · · Score: 1

      Fnck me. What happened to my paragraphs and line breaks? The above looks like I just vomited it. Sorry guys...

    2. Re:My 3 weeks with Lumia by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      When I ran your post in view source, there were line breaks. Did you post as HTML?

    3. Re:My 3 weeks with Lumia by toriver · · Score: 1

      Did you add them as HTML tags? Slashcode nukes most of that (except a few like i, b, quote, a). Paragraphs are separated with blank lines.

    4. Re:My 3 weeks with Lumia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was reading your post from a ticker tape I wouldn't have lost my place after the 8th - .

    5. Re:My 3 weeks with Lumia by master_p · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Lumia have an Enter key?

  114. Possible Fixes by istartedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't allow posts from accounts less than a year old to appear as first post. Hold them in queue until a few dozen posts have been made. You could also slow them down a bit by requiring two mod-ups to raise their score one point.

    AFAIK they already don't allow brand spankin' new accounts to moderate. The real challenge is dealing with established accounts that don't 'turf; but moderate up the turfers. It could be a political issue if you simply LART them.

    I hypothesize that if a user's up-mods all go towards new accounts, that user is likely a shill. They certainly have a strange bias. There's not much reason to skew your mods towards new accounts. Yeah, sympathy for high ID numbers; wanting to make new users feel good; but that's not really productive. We can do without that.

    There's still nothing to stop a determined bunch of 'turfers from gaining access. You should make them work for it though.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  115. That's really strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because Wozniak also stated that hos most preferred phone is still the iPhone. Does that mean that the iPhone is dying anytime soon, or does your selective logic apply only to Windows Phone?

    1. Re:That's really strange... by smash · · Score: 1

      Does this mean he is unable to change preference with the times? Wozniak liking the iphone has has just as much relevance as him liking windows phone. Pretty much none, as i stated for Windows phone above.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  116. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems legit to me

  117. I think Metro is ugly by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 0

    I haven't tried a new Windows phone yet but I've seen videos of the Metro interface, which will showcase in the Windows 8 desktop/laptop operating system. I think its ugly and unimpressive but that's my opinion. I don't see why Woz is ecstatic about it.

    1. Re:I think Metro is ugly by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I suggest you actually try it on a touchscreen device. It is good on those. Better than "grid of icons", anyway.

    2. Re:I think Metro is ugly by ninjacut · · Score: 0

      I am surprised about these comments, never used it and they still find it ugly compared to static grid of icons. Try it, actually it is a better UI both in form and function and need to give some credit to the folks.

  118. Re:Windows Phone 7 by istartedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    HTTP is not a replacement for every other protocol. I am sick of the brain dead thinking it is. We have other protocols for a reason

    This didn't happen because people are idiots. Admins censored the other ports, and people routed around it. Of course there are network tools that can tell if you are trying to piggyback something else through port 80, so you might as well finagle your exchanges into legitimate HTTP traffic.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  119. Lulz:Steve Jobs might have been reincarnated at MS by zaxbowow · · Score: 1

    "I also surmised that Steve Jobs might have been reincarnated at MS (Microsoft)" Classic! :) What if??? A new meme is born! http://memegenerator.net/Reincarnated-Microsoft-Employee-Steve-Jobs

  120. Re:Windows Phone 7 by MBCook · · Score: 1

    From what I read Skype does have the multitasking restriction. You can receive and answer Skype calls, just not if the app goes in the background.

    If you switch to the web browser, you don't receive calls. If you're in a call and switch to the web browser, your call drops.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  121. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    Windows phone 7 is full of interesting and good ideas with poor execution and little polish.

    Why would you expect it to be polished? They've barely had any time to work on it, and they needed to rush it out to market.

  122. Windows phone - may have something by P-niiice · · Score: 1

    My good friend who's a diehard Apple user had an upgrade come up, and basically got paid to get Lumia due to the recent $100 thing. He's absolutely in love with it. TMS may have a winner on their hands.

    1. Re:Windows phone - may have something by P-niiice · · Score: 1

      I mean MS might have a winner on their hands.

  123. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Creepy · · Score: 2

    The main significance is WHO is praising the Windows phone, not that it is MS shilling. Unfortunately, the poster degenerated into Apple bashing, which I find annoying. If you want to bash, look at market share - iPhone and Android crush Windows phone, which has less market share than mac does. I don't know where Windows phone stands today, but it lacked numerous features when Windows Phone 7 was released and I was in the market for a phone almost 2 years ago (like multitasking, html5 support, threaded email, and copy/paste).

    As for newsworthy, probably not as much as Ubuntu on Android though personally I dislike some of the changes made to Ubuntu lately (I have several flavors of Linux on various VMs for solving user problems, so "not using it" is not an option - I often have to use what customers use to see the problems they are seeing). I have no idea how it will translate to a phone.

  124. Re:Sad, too, he's assumed to be an Apple mouthpiec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I agree that the UI looks ok on a phone (it's not what I prefer but I understand the draw). However, MSFT is hedging its bets on that UI being on their desktop too.

    I'm sorry but it sucks on the desktop and while they may have made a great choice for the mobile devices of the world, they fucked up royally on desktops.

  125. Re:Possible Fixes - not going to happen by Jeng · · Score: 2

    Considering the posts have the same time stamp as the story it is obvious that /. is complicit in this and therefor unlikely to implement any changes.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  126. Re:Windows Phone 7 by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

    If it ran on Verizon, you could have probably used it on PagePlus for $12 per month assuming it was out of contract and unlocked.

  127. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    The last good OS from Microsoft Was DOS 6.22. If you replaced command.com with 4dos.com.

    I'd mod you +1 Funny and insightful for this if I had points. That brings back some memories.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  128. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Gr8Apes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's still a "windows" phone, advertised as such, so any failings in operation that appear to be software related will justly be seen as an MS failing.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  129. Re:Windows Phone 7 by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    How can it be 'most' of them? It must be either all, 1/2 or none! Unless fractional people get opinions. You can't get a 'most' of a group of only 2 people!

  130. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    HTTP is itself insecure. It's also TCP based, PTP, and there are a host of other reasons/limitations why it's unsuitable for a large range of purposes. But, if your world revolves around a simple insecure request/response model, I suppose it can accommodate.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  131. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1, Troll

    Windows phone 7 is full of interesting and good ideas with poor execution and little polish.

    Sounds like every Microsoft product ever.

    Wow, a blatantly trolling comment and it gets +5 insightful. Slashdot really is the Fox News of news sites - keep the group-think alive people, what's the worst that can happen!

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  132. Re:Windows Phone 7 by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    I use a Lumia 900 quite a bit nearly every single day and have yet to experience any of those issues.

  133. Re:Windows Phone 7 by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    No, it was a real response. You might like these kludges and braindead solutions, I don't. You might be able to hack HTTP into a replacement for all these things but that only means we don't get good replacements for those things.

  134. Re:Windows Phone 7 by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    I love my Lumia 900 and can always use extra money so can you please tell me how I might go about getting some of that money? Of course it could be simply that people actually like the product. Shocking I know.

  135. Re:Windows Phone 7 by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    I like Windows Phone 7 so does that make me a shill?

  136. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Probably due to hidden SSID which the phones can't handle.

    http://windowsphonesecrets.com/2010/08/04/windows-phone-missing-feature-of-the-week-connect-to-hidden-wireless-
    networks/

  137. Re:Windows Phone 7 by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    I find Windows 7 to be very polished. I just prefer Linux.

  138. Re:Windows Phone 7 by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a WP7 phone (HTC). I've never seen those issues. I'm guessing they are hardware/driver issues.

    If users are going to have to fight with drivers on their Windows phones, then Microsoft has already lost the race. Nobody wants to muck with drivers on their friggin' phone. What the hell does that even mean? It's not like someone swapped out the network adapter or anything -- so if they wifi doesn't work out of the box, the entire phone is suspect and isn't ready for consumers.

    And you can't blame the phone OS if the store can't make their WiFi and phones work together.

    Well, then maybe the OS+phone combo, but people kind of expect wi-fi to be a well solved problem. Find the network, enter the password, and go. It's not like it's new or anything.

    If I was testing out a phone, and I couldn't get it to use the wifi in the store, I'd simply move onto the next phone. That's some serious warning signals the phone is going to be problematic.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  139. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only network connection allowed is HTTP.

    You are wrong. I SSH from my WP7 all the time using "The SSH Client" on the marketplace. I'm not sure where you're getting your information.

  140. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but you are an idiot. Nearly everyone is connecting to a service they don't control, especially if they use Microsoft or Apple products!

  141. FTFY by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    But he's a technical genius and not a genius with regards to telling people what to want (that was Jobs).

    Much more accurate

  142. Re:Possible Fixes - not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a shareholder, I demand to see the MSFT deal announced, and/or for it to appear as a line item on the balance sheet. I should be getting paid (indirecty) for this too.

  143. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My relative got W7 phone as her first smartphone. During contact export from SIM card some phone numbers got reattached to wrong contacts. This is exactly what I told her: it is new, raw and un-patched, you bought it at your own risk.

    Corrupting your data isn't a bug, it's a feature. Security isn't required if the data leaked from your phone is invalid.

  144. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It actually doesn't mean anything. Ad hominem attacks are not valid arguments.

  145. Stallman and mobile phone... Ha. by chiark · · Score: 1

    Well, Stallman would be hard pushed to comment on this seeing as he point blank refuses to have a mobile phone, believing them to be tracking devices. Which I suppose they are.

  146. The user experience is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the DEVELOPER experience is TERRIBLE, No access to bluetooth, no side loading, no db storage, no this no that...

    Ever wonder why there is hardly any apps for WP? That is why. No developer story worth talking about...

    Everybody is going Droid because you can access everything. Field service/embedded/wearable apps are done with Android and iOS, not WP for a reason. Droid is open, WP is crippled.

    Bye bye WP. I know because I faced exactly this problem and had to recommend Android for a company, they had a choice forced onto them by Microsoft. Balmer loses yet again in the mobile space for another 5 years, they are at least 3 years behind the competition with regards to developer adoption.

  147. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

    So, then, you're saying his opinion is related to usability instead of aesthetics?

    I think you mean utility. Engineers know next to nothing about usability and intuitive interfaces.

  148. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    My cousin's friend's girlfriend says you can trust what people say online.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  149. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Meta-trolling? I hates me some meta-trolls something fierce I do!

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  150. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, that made me appreciate my N9 even more because 1) there are no immature fart apps on the N9. 2) the swipe UI on the N9 is awesome (how many times did he have to hit the back button to close "fart commander"?). 3) the N9 has proper multitasking (vs WM7's lame "do not close the app or lock your phone" message on one of those apps).

  151. Dancing with the Stars by smist08 · · Score: 1

    Is Woz losing it? Going on "Life on the D List" and then "Dancing with the Stars". Not sure I trust the judgement here anymore. Still the Apple I and II were great computers and great accomplishments.

  152. I like Woz by msobkow · · Score: 2

    Woz was the hardware guru who created the original Apple computers; Jobs was the marketing guy who got them in people's hands.

    But as a true "geek", Woz has the decency to respect his competition, and no shame in giving them praise when it's due.

    It's a shame so-called "businessmen" couldn't be as generous in their dealings with the competition.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:I like Woz by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      It's the job of "businessmen" to crush their competition.

    2. Re:I like Woz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean "his competitor"? Woz hasn't done a lick of work since 1978. He's not a samurai or some sort of marketplace warrior who honours his fallen enemies -- He's just a very very rich smart man who got out when the getting was good.

      This isn't throwing him under the bus; he's a genius at electronic design, but he's not exactly a bellwether for consumer demand. Put it this way: He likes the Segway.

  153. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe GP is referring to the high-UID, immediate first post shill that he replied to, not the Woz.

  154. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

    He had the audacity to put function over form.

    Which is an equivalent mistake to putting form over function. A well balanced amount of both is what makes a good product great.

  155. Re:Windows Phone 7 by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen one in person yet, but from the comemrcials they look pretty slick. Goatburg also gave a good reveiw. Once a model comes to VMo I'll give them a close look.

  156. Re:Windows Phone 7 by h5inz · · Score: 2

    This comment, and the other comments of this user remind me of an "Unspeakable Vault" comic strip:
    http://www.goominet.com/unspeakable-vault/vault/376/

  157. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to mod it up, until I saw that it was from a shill account.

    As for you: -1, clueless

  158. Re:Windows Phone 7 by JosephTX · · Score: 1

    you're assuming that the average business grad has the mental capacity for critical thinking or planning, seeing as 90% of them go into business school in the first place as a lazy get-rich-quick scheme. You just have to look at most tv commercials to see that the only place the average business marketer is manipulative is in their own head (and the South).

    At least some are funny, though. Just look at the allstate commercials.

  159. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all intensive purposes

    For all intents and purposes (FTFY)

  160. ...it doesn't look beautiful to 3D app developers by kanguru007 · · Score: 1

    C++ and OpenGL ES are respectively the most used language and graphics API for development of 3D applications on mobile devices. These are not available on WP7 phones. Is this locking developers in or out of WP7 app development?

  161. Channeling? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

    Maybe Steve Woz was just trying to channel Steve Jobs' spirit, but got Steve Ballmer's anti-spirit in an appalling New-Age screw-up. Did he also throw a chair or scream about killing Google?

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  162. With Jobs dead, Woz can speak freely by Cito · · Score: 1

    I've noticed Woz speaking more freely lately from praising open source to now liking microsoft phone interface over iphone's.

    Course we all know Steve Jobs was bipolar, would verbally assault employees, and even physically assault one at one point. Throwing temper tantrums, making developers work 16+ hours a day and the story that even made it to that old movie firing a guy for nodding off after 100 hour work week.

    He ran the place as a tyrant. and no telling how much verbal abuse and possible legal threats Woz received when he left. There are some candid interviews with Woz where he states he could be Job's friend but was a monster.

    Now with Jobs dead he has freedom now to finally speak his mind instead of be worried that some appletard will sue him or try and kill his pension for being anti apple now.

  163. Re:Windows Phone 7 by MrHanky · · Score: 1

    There are thousands of shill accounts on Slashdot with excellent karma, regular fanboys like Bonch, BasilBrush and SuperKendall who spend most of their time doing freelance (and most likely free) PR for some corporation. They usually don't get troll mods unless they deserve it, and I don't think it's more deserved just because the corporation in question is Microsoft.

  164. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had my Linux laptop crash yesterday. I looked up and saw a window trying to hide behind some venetian (sp?) blinds. I blame Gates.

  165. Re:Windows Phone 7 by toriver · · Score: 1

    So? People rarely go around memorizing founders of companies. How many remember Paul Allen of Microsoft? Larry Ellison founded what became Oracle with two other people, but hardly anyone knows the names of Robert Miner and Ed Oates. The first names of Hewlett and Packard? But it's not a big deal.

    You are not joking because you actually believe that... that is the sad part.

  166. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, and they've been paying clueless morons to rave about their shit on the internet too.

    Well I certainly never saw a dime of that money.

  167. Re:Sad, too, he's assumed to be an Apple mouthpiec by gtirloni · · Score: 0

    I find the Mac OS X interface very unproductive and prefer either Gnome2 or Windows over it.

    Having said that, it's still miles behind Gnome3 in terms of being the most unproductive.

    --
    none
  168. Re:Windows Phone 7 by theurge14 · · Score: 2

    One doesn't just get four bars in Mordor.

  169. Re:Windows Phone 7 by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Here's the problem people seem to forget; much to the advantage of apple.

    The OS goes on many different hardware devices. So it's difficult with one phone having problem to judge is its the OS, the Hardware, the OS implementation.

    I have huge respect for Woz. I give him more credence then pretty much any technical blogger. I really like how useful mt Nexus Android is, but I will taker a look wt windows latest offering when I want to upgrade.
    I probably won't, because MS links everything together in such away that fi one of them gets compromised, they all stop working.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  170. Re:Windows Phone 7 by geekoid · · Score: 1

    One ring to rule them all?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq0EmbY3XyI

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  171. Re:Windows Phone 7 by geekoid · · Score: 0

    " I've always felt that form should follow function"
    that was Steve Jobs fucking mantra. It WHY they are successful, you git. Their image comes from having better products.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  172. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    Nah - it just means that you lack taste. ;)

    (I jest, but you did leave the opening...)

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  173. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you think you should back up such accusations? For the past two years quite enjoyed my N900, and suited me ok. Before that a K800 (or some such), which also was quite a sturdy phone.
    But hey, that's just my anecdotical evidence against yours, right? Ohwait, you didn't even supply any 'evidence'.

  174. Re:Windows Phone 7 by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Regardless of your port forwarding and your ISP's limitations, it's still HTTP.

    Damn, people are grumpy today!

    Not saying HTTP is the best protocol for all situations, but if you've got HTTP and nothing else, you can pretty much do anything. You could even pre-encrypt your data and sent it over HTTP if you really had the need.

  175. Re:Sad, too, he's assumed to be an Apple mouthpiec by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

    agreed, so a more interesting question is what's more unproductive - unity or gnome3? both make me want to kill myself, but i like unity better because it makes me desperate to kill myself quicker, like with a gun, as opposed to slitting my wrists, which i hear can make you chilly and sensitive to drafts. with mac os x, it's more like a desire to jump off a building -- i still want to die quickly, but maybe a little user experience along the way doesn't hurt. and then the abrupt too-much-user-experience stop at the end.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  176. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    The phone's network stack was probably written by the same fine folks responsible for several million angry, frustrated, and miserable users with laptops and new installations of Vista who found themselves unable to connect to most wi-fi access points courtesy of the "feature" that ultimately led to KB928233 ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928233/en-us ) -- usually, when they were someplace where they couldn't easily get online to look up the solution.

  177. Re:Windows Phone 7 by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Informative
    Awww, butthurt fanboi is butthurt - what a shocker.

    That is your opinion, which you are entitled to, but with which I disagree. While I don't own any Apple products, I have used them before, and found their functionality and user interface to be lacking.

    that was Steve Jobs fucking mantra.

    Hate to burst your bubble but IMO your human Adonis, The Great and Powerful Jobs, was an abject failure in following his own mantra, then. If so, why do I hate their stuff? Oh, right - because locked down, proprietary bullshit that I pay for but technically do not own is the complete opposite of "functional" in my book. BTW, how long did it take Jobs to catch up to the PC industry, by realizing that having to click the mouse and hold a hotkey down is not the most functional way to access a context menu? 20 years?

    It WHY they are successful, you git.

    Negative, Ghost Rider - they are successful because they managed to turn being a douchebag hipster with more money than sense from a niche market to the mainstream... or maybe because douchebag hipsters became mainstream on their own...

    Their image comes from having better products.

    Again, this is a purely subjective topic, but what exactly makes their products "better," and what are they better than? Their OS is interesting but not spectacular, and kind of a pain-in-the-ass to use; their MP3 players are pretty, sure, but require locked-down, proprietary software; Their tablets are... well, as useful as any other tablet (which, to me, is not useful at all), but hardly anything to write home about.

    Their products are "pretty," I will admit. Unfortunately, in this case, pretty doesn't make the sale.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  178. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Not really.

    ByOhTek, TechLA, TechNY, TechCar, etc etc have been busted many times as shills. They're paid by Burson Marsteller to promote Microsoft products and denigrate their competitors. I'd rather trust a random AC than them.

  179. Re-zuned? by NetNed · · Score: 1

    Does it use any bits of zune? Oh it does? Then I would have to say Woz was only looking at half the picture. If it has zune stuff (i.e. software for syncing) then Woz hasn't even seen how horrible that experience can be and why it is something that trumps whatever pluses the phone has.

    Microsoft refuses to let the zune stuff die and it will likely take down this phone too.

    1. Re:Re-zuned? by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      If it has zune stuff (i.e. software for syncing) then Woz hasn't even seen how horrible that experience can be and why it is something that trumps whatever pluses the phone has.

      Zune is only used on Windows; for Mac there is a slim connector app.
      BTW, I haven't had any problems managing my phone with Zune, and I find it a lot more usable than iTunes. What are your specific issues with it?

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  180. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Relayman · · Score: 1

    Locked down? Why, I rooted my MacBook Pro in less than 15 minutes! I think the hardest part was figuring out what password to use.

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  181. Woz is stoned or something worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...first he claims that Apple is actually innovative in the last couple of decades, and then he calls that ghastly fugly UI from M$ pretty or something?!

    I think that Woz must be suffering from a brain tumor of some sort given these comments, or loads of monies and lawyers and financial advisors...

    wince(including their aborted wince 7 aka winders phonez 7 and winders 8 for ARM is nothing more than their crappy wince embedded OS which has been variously loaded down with crappy UI starting with teh originalz having winder 3.0 UI while being just as useless AND having fewer "featurez"...)

  182. Re:Windows Phone 7 by PiratePete1911 · · Score: 1

    Did you actually mean to say that you think Steve Wozniak is a paid Microsoft Shill? (Not to mention a clueless moron?) Or did you just fail to proofread your trolling?

    I'm pretty sure he was referring to the parent post by TechCar. The post is almost worded like a Microsoft commercial.

  183. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to post a "host" file containing all the shill accounts for us to 127.0.0.1 (i.e. add to our foes list).

  184. Not so nice, after all by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    He did say that Android "is no contest."

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  185. Re:Windows Phone 7 by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Most of the argument is based on his actual posting history, which isn't ad hominem.
    You can verify the posts and confirm or deny any bias the poster had.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  186. Nice after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My primary phone is the iPhone," said Wozniak. "I love the beauty of it. But I wish it did all the things my Android does, I really do."

    http://www.dailytech.com/Woz+I+Wish+My+iPhone+Did+All+The+Things+My+Android+Does/article23798.htm

  187. Re:Windows Phone 7 by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    Hi. While you were stuck in 2010, this feature was added in the Mango release.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  188. Re:Windows Phone 7 by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    fuck online storage(for which there are api's), give a _proper_ local storage.

    Proper for which use case?

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  189. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he seems not to be biased.

  190. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, 4DOS was the best! I still use 4NT as my main command prompt in Windows 7. It's starting to show its age though, but there really isn't a good replacement so that's why I keep using it..

  191. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    We are going to have to agree to disagree here. I would much rather have something ugly and useful than something pretty and useless. Function before form always. Putting it in a pretty package is just the icing on the cake.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  192. Re:Windows Phone 7 by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Was specifically referring to iTunes...

    Wait, rooted a MacBook? How does that work, and why would you have to root your computer?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  193. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    I'll assume you use Linux then. And you don't use X11, but just the virtual consoles. ONE virtual console actually. There is nothing you can't do in ONE virtual console.

    Come on. The balance is not necessarily the same for you, but if I forced you to do all your console work in ONE console you would be miserable.

  194. Re:Windows Phone 7 by godefroi · · Score: 1

    powershell?

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  195. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    I was talking about hardware, not software. Limiting yourself to one Linux console has nothing to do with what we are talking about. I am not a minimalist stating the least amount of resources should be used to get the job done. I am saying I would rather have a piece of hardware that works well and doesn't look "cool" rather than something that looks awesome but doesn't get the functionality right.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  196. Re:Windows Phone 7 by godefroi · · Score: 1

    Phones have hardware, therefore there are drivers. Users don't "muck" with them, but that doesn't mean they're not there. Because drivers are software, they can (and often do) have bugs. This is true for every phone platform from the old WM, to Android, iOS, BB, WP7, you name it. If hardware and software are interacting, a driver is necessarily involved, because that's what we call the bits of software that interact with hardware.

    If you didn't know, AT&T has WiFi APs in various areas. The software on my stock Galaxy S II (AT&T version, i-777) has some sort of weird built-in extra support for these access points. It connects to them automatically whenever they're in range.

    This is AT&T's software (at least on Android, I don't know how it works on WP7), so on my phone at least, I'd blame AT&T if it didn't work, not the underlying Android OS.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  197. Re:Windows Phone 7 by godefroi · · Score: 1

    People actually store contacts on SIM cards?

    Huh.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  198. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried using psh but couldn't really wrap my head around it. Maybe I need to try harder.

  199. Not hindered, just not interested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad that Wozniak was always hindered by his inability to be a bullshit artist.

    I question why you think he was "hindered." He's a fabulously wealthy geek who can pursue whatever interests he likes. Obviously he had no interest in becoming a buzzword-spouting script-reading corporate CxO. Feeling sorry for him for not being a successful chief executive is like pitying Steve Jobs for never becoming Prime Minister of Canada.

  200. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Relayman · · Score: 1

    If so, why do I hate their stuff? Oh, right - because locked down, proprietary bullshit that I pay for but technically do not own is the complete opposite of "functional" in my book.

    So buy a MacBook Pro; it's not locked down at all. My comment is a joke to anyone who knows Apple. Apple even tells you how to root it.

    I rooted a Mac once so I could change the name of the main administrative user (as I recall).

    --
    If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
  201. Re:Windows Phone 7 by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Was specifically referring to iTunes... Wait, rooted a MacBook? How does that work, and why would you have to root your computer?

    So buy a MacBook Pro; it's not locked down at all. My comment is a joke to anyone who knows Apple. Apple even tells you how to root it.

    Uh.... wanna try that again?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  202. To Little to Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if Windows did good on new OS to late as a owner of windows mobile 5 ,6 & 7 before my IPhone should have done this sooner
    Have no interest in new OS

  203. Re:Windows Phone 7 by godefroi · · Score: 1

    If you're on Windows (and you seem to be), then you ought to be using PowerShell. It really is that good.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  204. Re:Windows Phone 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the encouragement. I'll try it again.

    I guess it'd be really useful for server maintenance automation etc.